Harry and Meghan on the Dangers of Online Harm

Great story.

I love Jane Pauley.

[quote] launching a new initiative

I feel that's the 50th initiative/business launch they've done this year alone.

The nerve of Meghan to wear that wig on national television...also cheers to her for talking about her suicidal ideation with the same emotional conviction most of us invoke to discuss our bowel movements.

She really seems to love beige.

I don't know why people call Harry dumb.

He's actually quite intelligent, and you can see it in this interview.

Harry's also very compassionate and down-to-earth.

Yeah she was Dying to try to get attention.

R5 He's was also hungover or something for a good chunk of it. I thought he was going to fall out of his chair.

I hate these assholes. Experts on nothing, prattling for nothing but their own cash, and doing much harm online while complaining of "bullies," which they are.

Always talking about protecting the children meanwhile they are rarely with them

Meghan: I’m airing my struggle with suicidal thoughts to help others

[quote] She really seems to love beige.

I would call that taupe, actually. Or even puce.

I love how shapeless the outfit is.

I just checked: it's puce.

Thanks Meghan. I never knew people were suicidal at one time or another.

R11 Because muted colors make her look more Caucasian.

She typically stays away from colors that look great on black and biracial people.

I’m a faired skinned biracial myself. You can kind of “change your race” based on colors and hair.

Harry, William and Kate had the Heads Together program, you can't tell me she couldn't get any mental help in the UK

[quote] Because muted colors make her look more Caucasian.

I think it actually makes her look more tanned.

Good for them. I may criticize Harry and Meghan for any number of reasons, but I'll sing their praises for this!

They are doing good with this.

I cannot imagine the heart ache those parents go through.

R4, of course she loves beige, she is beige.

So this part of the interview is what bugs me about Meghan.

Why would she be "caught off guard" about Jane Pauley asking her about her own suicide attempt??

Especially when it's an interview about teen suicide prevention??

Meghan seems almost annoyed by the question.

And then she ends her statement here by saying, "If it saves one person, by me putting myself out there, then I'll TAKE THE HIT."

What hit? It's a fucking legitimate question!

Ugh. This is what infuriates me about Meghan. She's always playing the victim.

Geezus, their so self-important; they would happily 'put themselves out there' to talk about their bowel movements if there was a camera and lighting

Harry DOES look drunk!

Lol

Considering the bullying tactics of their "Squad", this "initiative" gives new meaning to the word hypocrisy.

I didn't think her voice could get any more annoying. I was mistaken.

Meghan is very well spoken, but I agree with you R23.

She's just so smug!

Like a total know-it-all.

R21 Harry looks completely checked out for most of that interview.

R22 Yeah it doesn't help matters that they had Christopher Bouzy, one of the leaders of the Sussex Squad, on their Netflix documentary. I'm sure this was a strictly controlled interview (they would never agree to a no holds barred one), but it's a pity Jane Pauley (who is actually a very detailed interviewer) didn't address this.

The best moment was one Pauley mention one of Meghan's projects has having a "modest start." Meghan need not look happy lol.

Also why does Meghan wear her pants up to just under boobs. And why did she bitch about allegedly only being allowed to wear muted colors in the royal family, when all she wears is beige. This outfit is more of a turmeric poo color.

[quote] Yeah it doesn't help matters that they had Christopher Bouzy, one of the leaders of the Sussex Squad, on their Netflix documentary. I'm sure this was a strictly controlled interview (they would never agree to a no holds barred one), but it's a pity Jane Pauley

Heaven help Jane Pauley if she dared to ask that question.

She would have been ripped a new asshole! ROFL.

Are the Palace employees still silenced by their NDAs? I’m sure quite a few have stories about Meghan bullying people.

[quote] Also why does Meghan wear her pants up to just under boobs. And why did she bitch about allegedly only being allowed to wear muted colors in the royal family, when all she wears is beige. This outfit is more of a turmeric poo color.

Lol.

The Meghan "death stare."

R27, do you really believe the stories about her are the most salacious? I pity you lol.

Call me crazy, but I think that Meghan looked so much prettier when she was pregnant and heavier.

Harry had a lot more hair back in 2021.

Besides them bullying Harry’s dying grandparents, the continued bullying of his family, and the supposed bullying of their staff, what makes them a resource for parents seeking help? I love how Harry tells parents to be first responders, but then says even first responders can’t recognize signs of potential suicide. Thanks Haz!!

I don't think she necessarily needs to kill herself, but she does need to go away.

On the next Survivor, I want to see Meghan and Fiona Harvey competing against each other.

[quote] Besides them bullying Harry’s dying grandparents...

Someone needs a cup of tea.

R29 The one on the right is more 'How dare you?!?', vs. a death stare.

These two twats are the LEAST relatable on the subject of mental health. A narcissistic and a drunk enabling each others twattitude.

As for Harry, since he's in LA he needs to get some Surface Hair/Awaken products to turn around the balding. Why isn't MEgan on this?

It's weird that we're seeing Harry and Meghan traveling all over the place, and doing media interviews.

And yet not a peep out of Charles, Camilla, William, and Kate.

They really are taking advantage of this period while the BRF are all incapacitated.

Strike while the iron is hot!

She looks more and more like Minnie Driver.

Didn't the duchess of Dish Soap bully three-year-old Charlotte?

I don't live in the USA. Are promotions for Meghan & Harry's interviews in heavy rotation before the actual show? Do Americans pay attention to them? Are they held in high enough regard that Americans listen to what they say and look to them for advice?

^No, no, and HELL NO.

A couple of zoned out liars right there

What are they lying about, R43?

The video is interesting.

From the greetings at the beginning of the op's video, it looks like Meghan and Harry just met all these people.

The subject Meghan and Harry should be giving advice on is how to ghost family members (and in Meghan's case, your first husband).

What exactly are William and Kate doing for anyone, R46?

[quote] I don't live in the USA. Are promotions for Meghan & Harry's interviews in heavy rotation before the actual show? Do Americans pay attention to them? Are they held in high enough regard that Americans listen to what they say and look to them for advice?

Not so much.

This interview is with CBS Morning, which only airs on Sunday morning, if I'm not mistaken.

Preparing to be bigger parasites r47

It's weird how even when Harry and Meghan try to do good, the haters still can't stop hating.

R47 Not moaning about their immense privilege non-stop, that's for sure.

How did “reporting the other thread to Muriel” go for you, OP? Do you feel vindicated? Validated? Laughed at?

I’m curious.

[quote]I don't know why people call Harry dumb.

Well, the first person to do it in public was his mother, who called him "an airhead like me".

I wouldn’t call Harry dumb as he can obviously speak. I’d go with “thick as two short planks” - but that’s just me.

They're not "trying to do good", r50, they're trying to promote themselves as alternative royals/new Dianas. We can see through this particular initiative, however, especially as they have set off a shitsrorm of the vilest online bullies with their innuendos, half-truths and attacks on his family, which they have never done a single thing to stop or temper or even acknowledge. Some of the most horrific online bullying happened earlier this year against his brother and sister-in-law, most of it by the insane Sussex Squad, a monster they created, yet their only public comment was a snidey, begrudging remark when Catherine (whom their statement referred to as Kate) announced her cancer.

If they really wanted to dedicate their lives to doing good, then they should have stayed in the royal family where they had the biggest platform in the world for doing good.

R5, Harry's "intelligence" and "compassion" are solely the result of him growing up in the royal family, where he was basically trained for a life of public service, which he then went and shat all over.

R55 Yeah it’s funny how Kate and William were bullied this year and they stayed pretty silent on it.

In the pre-Markle days, William, Catherine and Harry (but mostly William) set up an organisation called Heads Together to work on mental health issues, each focusing on a different aspect. William was working on suicide prevention. It even reached the American media. From 2017:

[quote]William, Kate and Prince Harry formed the charity "Heads Together" to break down the barriers surrounding mental health. The charity has partnered with eight mental health organizations to change the conversation on mental health. So many people young and old feel ashamed to discuss the challenges they face. The young royals hope to change that perception through their campaign encouraging young children, teachers and families to open up and seek help without fear of judgment.

[quote]Each has focused on a different aspect of the disease. William, through his work as an air ambulance pilot and a leading advocate for the homeless, was struck by suicide among men under 40.

[quote]"Suicide is the biggest killer of men under 40 in this country. Not cancer, not knife crime, not road deaths — suicide." Prince William said in a speech Monday evening. "If one of these other issues took so many young lives, there would be a national outcry. This silence is killing good people.”

Her negligence harmed daddy, she gave him a heart attack.

Meghan has resting bitch face. She just looks like such an unpleasant person. And she seems totally checked out from Harry, despite maintaining a hand on his leg as a measure of control the entire interview. She will offload him within a year.

The project they're promoting is an online group for maybe 12 parents of deceased children, whose deaths are in some way linked to the internet. One was bullied; another tried to buy drugs and wound up with Fentanyl. In the scheme of things, it's nothing and they're getting millions in publicity as humanitarians. What's the takeaway here? The internet is evil. Don't buy drugs on the internet. Have your kids tell you if they're bullied online. Harry and Meghan haven't said anything about best practices for using the internet. Lots of those guidelines already exist and they don't seem to be aware of them. Harry is talking about the impossibility of parents knowing what their kids are up to, but he hardly comes from a typical parenting situation. He's also incompetent at just about everything and assumes everyone else is, too. I do not buy Meghan's suicidal ideation story. Apparently, it happened the night she went to the theater and sat in the first row of a box seat. If you know someone is suicidal, why would you not call a doctor immediately and why would you take them someplace where they could hurl themselves over the balcony? Also, she told Oprah she recovered because of Harry's love and his hugging her. No medication or therapy. That's just not credible.

The Markles are experts on NOTHING except promoting themselves. Lying grifters. GTFO.

Tons of stuff, r47, which if you actually followed their work you know. Before her operation and cancer diagnosis, Catherine was doing lots of early years work and stuff with children. William does loads of stuff with kids and is embarking upon a big programme to tackle homelessness as well as his environmental projects. They also do lots of work with different, often forgotten communities, the military, sports, hospitals, wildlife, and the suchlike. They just don't make a big hoo-ha about it like Harry and Meghan do - Harry and Meghan's only goal being to make a big hoo-ha.

If you're really interested in their work, you can follow them on social media or their website to find out.

I like Jane Pauley; I was under the impression she had retired a long time ago.

[quote] If you're really interested in their work, you can follow them on social media or their website to find out.

No thank you.

Self appointed oracles. They have nothing original to offer.

Poor Jane Pauley she looks like she got stuck with them

[quote]launching a new initiative,

Launching a new failure.

If you don't want to know what William and Catherine are doing, r65, then don't ask what they are doing.

[quote] I like Jane Pauley; I was under the impression she had retired a long time ago.

No, they pushed her out of the Today Show, in favor of a younger woman.

I can't remember if it was Deborah Norville or Katie Couric who replaced her.

I would love to see Harry and Meghan strike it rich one day, and just make their haters cry their eyes out.

Get richer selling jam and dog biscuits? They’re rich now. I don’t see more big paydays coming.

They already struck it rich with 100M from Netflix and 20M from Spotify. If they would stop the faux humanitarian stuff and planting articles and media appearances about how wonderful they are, people would be happy to ignore them. Haters is too strong a word. Try groaners and cringers.

Harry and Meghan did strike it rich as in being in the best position they could ever be in as members of the royal family, r71, and then they blew it.

Harry will experience expert bullying if he ever tries to divorce her.

I love this.

Another thing William and Kate do is seek the counsel of professionals and then give said professionals due credit for their work. Harry and Meghan spout nonsense or steal other people's work and pass it off as their own knowledge. They never give credit to other people's expertise.

R72, The Queen Mother left him a huge trust fund which he can access when he turns 40. Who knows what Queen Elizabeth left him. They won’t starve.

Way to tell us you have BPD without telling us you have BPD. They have a tendency to use suicide threats as a means of control and attention. No wonder Harry looks like a burnt out husk of a human being.

The thought of her "jam" sent me puking to the loo.

R65, happy to stay ignorant. Fits a pattern.

So Meghan will be with him for at least another 4 years, to get that sweet 10 year divorce money.

There is no 40yo trust to access, and Sparkles is entitled to half of their marital assets right now, frauen.

Inherited money is not part of marital assets unless that money has been combined with marital assets.

So, if Harry has any inheritance coming his way, he should take care NOT to mingle it with any joint marital funds.

[quote] Meghan Markle Says She Has Not ‘Scraped the Surface’ on Publicly Discussing Her Suicidal Thoughts

During a CBS interview with Meghan Markle and her husband, Prince Harry, about their new Parents’ Network program, Markle said there is still more to discuss when opening up about her struggles with suicide to the media.

“When you’ve been through any level of pain or trauma, I believe part of our healing journey, certainly part of mine, is being able to be really open about it,” Markle said. “And I haven’t really scraped the surface on my experience, but I do think that I would never want someone else to feel that way, and I would never want someone else to be making those sort of plans, and I would never want someone else to not be believed.”

Markle first spoke publicly about her suicidal thoughts in a 2021 sit-down interview with Oprah Winfrey, admitting to the talk show host that she felt “ashamed” when first discussing it with her husband and family.

“I was really ashamed to say it at the time and ashamed to have to admit it to Harry especially because I know how much loss he has suffered. But I knew that if I didn’t say it, then I would do it,” Markle said. “I just didn’t want to be alive anymore.”

Three years later, Markle has grown more comfortable discussing her struggle. Though it remains a sensitive topic for the Duchess of Sussex, she hopes her words can support those fighting with suicidal thoughts and encourage them to seek help.

“If me voicing what I have overcome will save someone, or encourage someone in their life to really genuinely check in on them, and not assume that the appearance is good so everything is ok, then that’s worth it,” Markle added. “I’ll take a hit for that.”

This "parents group" will quietly dissolve soon. Harry and Markle will have nothing to do with it.

Do you really think they are going to lower themselves to be involved and actually work? Get serious.

The parents group has no focus. In the interview, they discussed kids who have been harmed which seemed to fall into three unrelated groups:

1. Those who have been bullied.

2. Those suffering from depression

3. Those who bought drugs online.

Jane Pauley and the Markles did not do a good job of explaining how to identify the problem and go forward. And the Markles are NOT experts at all. Even Pauley admitted that there were not an "army of parents" participating, which currently totals about 12 people. And Markle responded by saying, "Well, you have to start somewhere." And that was it. Not even a blueprint of a plan to go forward. But Markle didn't waste a moment posting the interview on the Archewell website, which is joke of a website resource.

This is about the last anyone will hear about this group or an attempt at a solution. The Markles are grifters.

R83,

Nobody will ever know what he inherited from the late Queen, because UK monarch’s wills are not published.

[QUOTE]they discussed kids who have been harmed which seemed to fall into three unrelated groups:

[QUOTE]1. Those who have been bullied; 2. Those suffering from depression; and 3. Those who bought drugs online.

In what universe are these three issues unrelated or uncorrected? Bullied kids experience anxiety and depression. (Or do you think they're so superhumanly resistant they're unaffected?) People, children especially, turn to palliative coping measures.

Where the fuckety fuck do you get your uninformed and frankly dangerous yammerings, r87? A fortune cookie issued by the Trump La Farage campaigns?

*UNCORRELATED* not uncorrected at r89.

The reported Netflix and Spotify paydays were highly inflated and best-case scenario. Also, the inflated numbers were to entice other big companies to make them lucrative offers, like at an auction, the bidding starts at .... No other big companies were stupid enough to fall for it nor did any of them come calling. Lemonada?? LOL.

That's what the Narkles said, dumbass at R89

"The Duchess will only entertain offers from A list Directors and Producers", or something to that effect .....

honestly, you could piss your pants laughing at the degree of pomposity!

I remember that, R93 - I assume that “The Duchess” is still sorting through piles of offers from the A List. So many!

[QUOTE]That's what the Narkles said, dumbass at [R89]

And you bought it hook, line, and sinker.

Jane Pauley fucked up interviewing these two lying grifters.

Clearly, online bullying doesn’t work, or else these two famewhore grifters would have taken the hint and fucked off years ago.

I could understand her talking about cyber bullying and online harassment linked to poor mental health. Why did they specifically make it about kids?

To look like humanitarians, r98.

They just want to shut up all the comments on Page Six and the DM, but use children as a trojan horse to shut up everyone except the Sussex Squad.

They should be more afraid of their children getting online when old enough and seeing Mama Backfat in that red Carolina Herrera gown.

R84, great concept to not mix inheritance funds in with shared assets, but what do you say to your partner? "No, I'm keepigng that separate in case we ever break up?"

The only way to do it effectively is to keep partners unaware you've inherited anything.

R17, the Harkles are exploiting those poor parents and the memory of their dead children. This is just corny, shameless Meghan-style PR. If she's so concerned about the mental health of others, she could call her father for a start.

[quote] They should be more afraid of their children getting online when old enough and seeing Mama Backfat in that red Carolina Herrera gown.

I can't wait until these kids get older.

There's going to be so much bad blood between Harry/Meghan's kids and William/Kate's kids.

It'll be the WAR OF THE ROSES!

William and Kate are leaving their children a legacy of hatred for their black American cousins.

“Black”, R102?

Real philanthropists fund things that we hear about once they start delivering results (or are partnering with credible, well-established orgs).

These folks come up with schemes to grab headlines and position them to look good, and announce them when they are on the drawing board and may never pan out.

Wish they would shut up. They are not experts in anything.

One does not need to be relateable.

Maybe if they had taken up this cause from the beginning before they fled the UK, then they could have had something meaningful to do in the Royal Family. It would have been Meghan's way to fight back against the admittedly terrible British tabloids with the upper hand.

R107, you must have missed the bit where, before Markle appeared in Harry's life, William, Catherine and Harry set up an organisation called Heads Together to work on mental health issues, with each covering a particular area of mental health and William was dealing with suicide. He was shocked to discover, when working in air ambulance, that there were so many male suicides or suicide attempts and felt this was an issue around which there was much silence. As he said in 2017:

[quote]“My first callout was to a male suicide and I was told there were five suicides or attempted suicides every day in East Anglia alone. When I looked into it I was shocked by how bad this situation is – suicide is the biggest killer of men under 45 in the UK – which is absolutely appalling.”

William still continues his suicide prevention work, visiting a suicide prevention centre just this April:

[quote]A visit by the Prince of Wales to a new suicide prevention centre for men will "one million per cent" help to save lives, a service user has said.

[quote]Prince William spoke to men who have struggled with their mental health while at the newly-opened James' Place in Newcastle on Tuesday.

[quote]Dean Stewart, 31, from Gateshead, told the royal visitor how he had struggled with thoughts of self-harm after he dealt with a gambling addiction, and said the visit would help to publicise the centre's work.

If your children die from ordering drugs online, that's not suicide. That's's an OD. That;s a different set of issues from the children who die by suicide from bullying. Perhaps the 12 parents in this initiative will find comfort in discussing death by internet use rather than inattention to their children's drug use or depression. R89, since you're a noted mental health expert, please get help for your anger management issues.

R89 is also an idiot for his stupid moron Trump Farage comment, as if Harry and Meghan stand for any kind of progressive politics while the royal family are the right wing.

More is more when it comes to resources and information about the dangerous, heartbreaking effects of this terrible "online" reality we all live in, and for some of us, die in.

I hope the parents who were part of this segment felt heard. To the extent that they can, they want to spare anybody else from suffering what their children suffered and the grief they live with.

Now, on to the interview of the Sussexes.

Jane Pauley is an experienced, seen-it-all pro. For decades, she's taken on, and learned from interviewing, and probably personally knows, just about any famous person you can think of.

I'm so curious, therefore, to know something I'll never know - how she sized up the Sussexes.

I detect disingenuousness on Markle's part at her seeming to have reeled at Pauley bringing up Markle's own words about feeling suicidal during her time in the UK. Or, if viewed in the best possible light on Markle's behalf, I find it a mistake on her part to not have been prepared for her being asked about it.

Markle, on world-wide TV during the Oprah interview, brought up her suicidal ideation. I don't find fault with Markle for that. I take her at her word about her experience. Apparently, she had her reasons to want to disclose that.

But once you open that door publicly, everybody else gets to walk through it, too. It puzzles me, therefore, why Markle wouldn't have expected that question from Pauley, particularly given the underlying subject matter.

I'm no body language expert. Hell, I'm not even an expert on what I convey verbally and physically.

But there is something negative in the air between those two. Harry looked down in reaction to something Markle said as though he wanted to cringe, but he stopped himself.

She is BORED OUT OF HER MIND with Harry. He irks her to no end. And no amount of her placing her hand on his knee diverts from that. In fact, confident couples feel no need at all to express physical contact with each other in public.

I see divorced people.

She'll try to endure the marriage until King Charles dies. She wants to be his legal daughter-in-law when that happens for both branding and financial reasons, which is the smart move on her part.

Unless Harry pulls a shocker and files for divorce first.

[quote]But there is something negative in the air between those two. Harry looked down in reaction to something Markle said as though he wanted to cringe, but he stopped himself.

Because Harry knows its all a lie.

I thought this was a thread on the dangers of Online HAM.

These two can't ever divorce. They share too many secrets and have too much dirt on each other.

He's trapped himself, r112. I can't imagine them staying together forever, but I think it will be a number of years before they divorce. Harry still has some stages to go through before he can get to the point of extricating himself psychologically. Meghan is part of the narrative he's constructed in his great crusade against his family and the tabloids, so if he rejects her then he's basically admitting that everything he's done in the past few years is wrong. My feeling is things will only start to click for him when the kids are older and start asking questions and also have no family around them aside from Doria. No cousins, no trusted playmates. They will have to go to the right kind of school, make the right kind of friends, start having their own opinions. I suspect Harry wants them to recognise their Britishness and their family's special role and heritage within Britain. He may even want to send them to boarding school in the UK. If his kids grow up to be Americans then Harry will realise that his connection with Britain is pretty much over, and I don't think that's what he ever really intended.

[quote]She'll try to endure the marriage until King Charles dies. She wants to be his legal daughter-in-law when that happens for both branding and financial reasons, which is the smart move on her part.

The second Charles dies is the very second William becomes King. That will not benefit Meghan in any way.

[quote] The second Charles dies is the very second William becomes King. That will not benefit Meghan in any way.

It won't benefit William in any way, either.

Everyone in his family hates him.

He's going to have to start kissing some major ass, to get his family to attend his events and functions.

Andrew hates him, Harry hates him, Camllla hates him, Bea and Eug just tolerate him, and Edward is kind of "meh" about William.

None of them really like him.

They just defer to him because he's the future King.

He's going to be quite lonely out on that limb.

r118, first of all, you know nothing.

Secondly, heavy is the head that wears the Crown; or something along those lines.

Thirdly, they're family.

[quote] Thirdly, they're family.

Yeah, you really need to tell that to William the Terrible.

He's the one banishing all of his relatives from the family.

Wait until he discovers that he'll actually need their support, later on.

r120, you do understand that your aspersions mean nothing, and have no effect now or ever, to the reality that is the daily life of the British Royal Family.

We need to have at least three threads a day on these essentially irrelevant people so the Britfascists can vent their hatred on them.

God only knows what they’d be getting up to without their scapegoats!

If Lachlan and Sarah Murdoch had to return to live in Australia because their family (particularly the kids) being frozen out of social circles in LA, it won't be any better for Archie and Lili.

Meghan will be aiming for her kids to make friends with the children of the most elite stars and power players. Those people will not want to associate with the Harkles, even separated by a degree or two. Social cryptonite.

R122, what would you do if you weren't coming onto threads like this to critique us?

Pot. Kettle. Black.

Like many if not most posters here, I'm an Anerican and greatly enjoy thrashing the Dummies of Sussexx.

R118 is such a stupid fucking idiot, it's almost laughable.

R122 is another idiot.

R118 is the Paris Olympics threads’ medal tally obsessive, in case anybody is wondering about its intellect, or lack thereof.

Those Harkle kids are going to have zero people skills what with being so isolated. Who are they exposed to? A revolving door of nannies and household help? Stoner Doria?

Play dates likely are arranged for them. You have to wonder if any other celebrities will invite the Harkles over though.

Precisely, r128. This is beyond a case of their parents "protecting" them, it's almost passive-aggressive. The kids are also not going to have the skills to deal with the limelight that will be cast on them as they grow older, which will be more intense due to their parents insisting that they be called prince and princess. William and Catherine's kids are protected but they're also being raised to know how to behave in public, how to talk to different people, ask questions, be confident, deal with public and media attention.

I doubt the Harkle kids even have play dates.

Parents of other kids aren't going to want to deal with delusional Meg's rules and "SECURITY" and probably even NDAs. I can't imagine the list of Dos and Don'ts that her almighty Highness issues to the parents, nannies and household staff of any potential playmates.

Even if she manages to wrangle an initial play date for her kids, I doubt there is a second playdate after having to deal with her. Just not worth it.

Those kids are screwed.

Weirdo thread

Did it escape Harry's wife's attention that Chrissy Tiegan, one of her supposed bffs and a recipient of Meg's coveted jam, told a teenager on social media to kill herself?

Megsie: “You insult or harass me in an interview that’s televised, then I harm you online!”

[quote] The second Charles dies is the very second William becomes King. That will not benefit Meghan in any way.

Potentially, it will, r117. Your first sentence is fact, but let's set that aside for a moment.

My point is, King Charles will be dead, but bequeathal from KC (if any) to Harry of cash and/or property interest lives on.

While inheritance, strictly segregated from marital assets, remains with the beneficiary, I surmise that Markle isn't taking any chances. If a divorce settlement is to happen, say, with regard to the children, she's in a much better position to still be KC's daughter-in-law upon his death, not an ex daughter-in-law.

Besides, if Harry is going to come into any mare cash and property upon KC 's death, Harry may have to open the purse strings from that to convey to Markle a divorce pay-out.

As for branding (ugh) purposes, admittedly, this is pure guessing on my part, but I think Markle has already, and finally, realizes she has to gird herself to attend KC's funeral.

The free TV coverage alone will make it worth her while. She gets to remind the world of her familial place within the BRF; a place she rejected, but you'd be surprised at how far a little publicity can go to overcome whatever principles you may think you have.

Those are some of the reasons why she will still want to be KC's daughter-in-law when he dies. An ex-daughter-in-law doesn't get a seat at the funeral.

I doubt she will get a seat at Charles' funeral even as a current daughter in law. Maybe she could be a commentator on the funeral alongside Gayle King for CBS news instead?

R135, coincidentally being in the country at the same time that Queen Elizabeth died didn't benefit Markle in any way at all. It only amplified what a nasty person she is and what Harry has lost in leaving his country, family and role for her.

How are they going to stop online bullying and/or drugs being sold online?

Morons exploiting parents who have suffered enough already.

They're "raising awareness," R138. The usual claim of phony charities, because success or failure of such isn't measurable.

You really think that the BRF will exclude Markle from KC's funeral if she's still Harry's wife?

She doesn't merit that kind of bother, and to do deny her an invitation would ascribe to her too much importance.

They won't disinvite her, and among the reasons they won't is because they know how these things are supposed to be done. We're talking about a class of people that, if they didn't invent palace intrigue, I'd argue they may have perfected it, 2nd only to the Vatican.

In the event of King Charles funeral, both Sussexes will be invited and expected to attend, just as the BRF knows they should be. Harry is the son of the (former) King.

And those wily, crafty Windsors know who they're dealing with. They'll make sure they document that they both were invited, just in case Markle gets it into her head that she wants to chicken-out from attending and then insinuate that she didn't attend because she wasn't welcome.

Mark my words. If the Sussexes are still intact, living together, legally married spouses, they 'll both be invited to KC's funeral.

Then, the BRF will twist the knife by affording them the coolest, most distant, yet civil and polite interaction.

And I'll even go so far as to argue that William himself may allow Harry and Meghan to be seated near him, just to drive the point home about hierarchy.

They will be seated behind Anne once again, who will break out her Napoleon hat with the tall red feather to block any real view of the the Harkles

Markle attending King Charles' funeral will be a completely irrelevant moment. The only interesting thing about it - if she does appear - is if she allows the kids to attend. If Charles dies in 5 years they will be old enough to make the trip. Markle won't be able to use the excuse of the kids anymore as to why she has to stay behind. They will then be attending the funeral of the grandfather they never knew, thanks to their parents, and will be seeing for the first time this magnificent pageantry and heritage of constitutional importance - something that they could personally have been part of but were deprived of it by their mother. This will again only emphasise how much Harry fucked up thanks to Markle and what a jerk she is.

Other than that, not only will Markle be completely irrelevant at Charles' funeral, so will Harry. I'm not sure why this poster keeps going on about Charles' future funeral in this way. They will be as relevant as Andrew at the Queen's funeral - allowed to march with his siblings behind the hearse and sit at the front because it is his mum's funeral after all, but beyond that they'll be as obscure as at the Queen's funeral.

She keeps flailing to find something to champion and get into the news. Poor thing.

[quote]Markle attending King Charles' funeral will be a completely irrelevant moment. The only interesting thing about it - if she does appear - is if she allows the kids to attend.

Oh Lord. On top of steering George in the right direction and sporadically sitting on Louis, I'll have the hillbillies to deal with!

Wow, these two. They look at the world and see nothing but problems that they want to devote themselves to for a month, then move onto the next thing. They're really just boring scolds at this point.

All this talk of King Charles' impending demise! He'll be around much longer than anyone is giving him credit for on this forum.

We've had to deal with the likes of That Whore Anne Boleyn in this Kingdom. Harry's doxie is nothing new, unfortunately.

It must be difficult for someone of low mental acuity to come to terms with being irrelevant after spending his entire life being relevant just for being born.

I forget: did Meghan go to the Queen's funeral?

[quote]All this talk of King Charles' impending demise!

On DL, it's Viagra.

OK, I guess they did.

Not only did Meghan attend QE II’s funeral, as she should have, garment-wise, she was one of the best-dressed, a rare distinction for her.

Meghan was channeling Joan Collins in her get-up at the Queen's funeral.

And nobody bought her performance after seeing the Youtube video of her praising her own acting trick of "One Tear...Left eye" which was on display that day.

Meghan is dressed by the palace when at formal royal events in the UK, that's the only reason she looks reasonable.

What kind of shenanigans would she pull at Charles' funeral? It would be her last hurrah before Willilam takes over and I doubt she would go out quietly, more like with a bang.

At the Queen's funeral she tried to stage a solo walkabout which William and Catherine intercepted. She also wanted to keep flowers given by the crowd so she could sashay over and place them herself. She arranged for paps to get a private moment of Charles receiving his mother's coffin with halfwit Harry and herself behind Charles. She also told Scoby the Queen's coffin was arriving by train from Scotland which he promptly leaked to the Press. The coffin arriving by train was misinformation given to halfwit Harry to catch him out.

Those Harkle kids wouldn't be able to handle the spotlight of a huge, public funeral given how cloistered and isolated they are.

My guess is Charles would leave instructions that it is his wish she does not attend. This would spare his widow, William and Catherine a lot of trouble at a difficult time and also absolve them of the blame for it. Not how the RF usually does things, but malicious Meg is a unique situation.

She used an actor's cry stick at the Queen's funeral as she couldn't even muster her usual one tear, left eye.

There was schmutz on her glove fingertip from touching her eye where the tear stick was placed. It's like vaseline so it looked white on the black glove.

Why that little vixen!

[quote] Meghan was channeling Joan Collins in her get-up at the Queen's funeral.

Yeah, the only question I have is, was it deliberate? Because if it was, that's a side of wit to her that Markle should show more often.

In fact, if she ever has to go back to acting to keep food on the table, she should seriously consider a villain role.

True, she doesn't have the talent and charisma of Collins or Vanessa Williams in Ugly Betty, but I could see her mustering the chops to take on the same type of role that Heather Locklear had in Melrose Place.

R155

[quote]She arranged for paps to get a private moment of Charles receiving his mother's coffin with halfwit Harry and herself behind Charles.

Mr & Mrs Harry chose to position themselves on the stairs behind Charles like a pair of ghouls.

You can see that others have gathered to pay their respects, but the others understood the importance of Charles alone attending the last arrival of Queen Elizabeth at Buckingham Palace.

Harry and his wife - Ghoulish.

[quote] Mark my words. If the Sussexes are still intact, living together, legally married spouses, they 'll both be invited to KC's funeral.

Meghan won't attend his funeral, nor will she allow her children to attend.

There's absolutely no reason for her to do so.

They hate her, and she hates them.

And with William ascending the throne, there is even more reason for her not to attend.

She has left that place behind, in her rear-view mirror.

Harry will attend on his own, and stay only for the service. Then he'll leave immediately after.

That relationship is forever gone.

[quote] There's absolutely no reason for her to do so.

I guess if we both outlive KC, and Markle does, too, we'll see.

Let's stipulate to the mutual dislike between the BRF and Markle, but I do think there are reasons for her to attend, in person, major ceremonial events, and not only for those reasons I outlined in my post at r135.

For her children, posterity is another reason Markle should attend. I think she'll regret someday not attending Charles coronation.

One day, those Sussex children are going to be curious about their father's family. They'll come across pix of the coronation and ask, "But where are you, Mom"?

After all, both Sussexes whined about their children not receiving the royal styles they believed they were entitled to, but, apparently, Markle can't be bothered to be present at ceremonies that are directly related to those styles?

Markle is afraid she'll get booed again. And she's not going through that ever again. She won't attend anything in the UK, and neither will the kids.

Harry will attend the funeral and will leave as soon as the service is over. Harry has dug himself into a bottomless hole. He's miserable living in the U.S., but he can't leave since he will have to say goodbye to his kids and only visit them periodically. Markle isn't giving up the kids--the only money tap she'll have left.

R162 Megz is terrified of being booed. She lucked out at St. Paul's during the late Queen's Jubilee service because the peeling bells managed to tune out enough of the booing for the media to initially question it. But immediately after the service, the two backed out of the remaining Jubilee events (including the big concert) despite being invited. This is also when their harping about security really took hold. Yes, they mentioned it on Oprah but it wasn't the big deal they've now turned it into. Then Megz was low-key embarrassed at the Queen's funeral when during the joint walkabout with W&C, several people in the crowd refused to shake her hand. It's not only in the UK, they were heckled in New York, they were heckled at the ESPY awards. Apparently Harry's ITV interview was a flop being beaten in the rating by a rerun of Mayday! Airline Disasters. Not sure about the CBS interview but apparently YouTube version of it has something like 20K dislikes to 2K likes.

Everything you wrote at R163 just proves how unhinged the Meghan haters are.

They're full of hatred and bile, whipped up into a frenzy by the British Tabloid "Media."

They fueled the fire for racist attacks against Meghan, and now they are relentlessly bullying her, no matter what she does.

Good? Bad? It doesn't matter.

They're like rabid dogs going after fresh meat.

That's how insane this hatred towards Meghan has become.

It's the same vitriol you see from MAGATS posting against Democrats, Biden, and Kamala.

They're the exact same type of people.

Nice try. For unhinged you should check out the Sussex Squad, who's actions Harry and his wife have yet to disavow.

R164 despite the fact that everything R162 is substantiated by quick Google searches?

That made no sense, R166.

[quote]They fueled the fire for racist attacks against Meghan, and now they are relentlessly bullying her, no matter what she does.

R164. Disliking Markle has nothing to do with her mixed race. The UK welcomed her with open arms and a $35 million wedding. And now they have worn out their welcome in the US. People dislike her (and Harry) because they are fucking lying grifters and see no purpose to them or in anything they do. They are useless. It has nothing to do with race.

Once again they had way more dislikes than likes

Harry and Megz interview on CBS Morning failed to draw in more viewers than normal and was the 40th most watch show on Sunday.

^^^

Klan Granny, furiously fingering her cunt while wearing her white hood!

Go to town, girl.

You're completely pathetic.

*yawn* there goes KGT again

KGT is nothing if not predictable.

I can't wait to see how the Colombia trip plays out.

I'm anxious to see her outfits.

R174 I’m predicting a neutral palette with Harry High Pants trousers cinched under the post implants flappy boobs and the flared hems dragging in the picturesque third world dirt. Hopefully the Wimbledon Panama hat is a rewear and there’s sure to be some indigenous cosplay with wooden beaded bracelets.

For evening, jewel tones in red or green - doesn’t really matter so long as it doesn’t fit. Will the Saudi blood diamond earrings appear? Probably not - the crown has probably and belatedly confiscated them.

Oh, and I’m hoping for an unpicked vent hem or garment tag still attached if she gets abusive with her stylist.

Because the Parents Network goes so well with selling wine.

But what about the dog biscuit and jam tie in, R176? So judgy.

R75, what about her midsection when she eschews Spanx?

Teenage Suicide: Don't Do It!

The phrase “dangers of online harm” makes my eyes cross.

Meghan should start selling T-shirts.

[quote]One day, those Sussex children are going to be curious about their father's family. They'll come across pix of the coronation and ask, "But where are you, Mom"?

As if. As if they won't have heard the story of their mother's vilification and exile from the BRF twenty times before breakfast on a daily basis. She and Harry will have to get their side of the story dinned into those little heads like folklore before they can hear it from anywhere a bit more neutral.

Hopefully she gets her wig situation fixed so as not to distract from her heinous fashions

[quote]As if. As if they won't have heard the story of their mother's vilification and exile from the BRF twenty times before breakfast on a daily basis.

Time for bed. Since we read The Bitch last night, we'll try The Bounce again tonight. We can The Botch next week.

I couldn't focus on what she was saying to CBS because of that wig. C

That red dress in R178 displaying the fug fillers/surgery/sad Ozempic -- she is quite badly hit in both the face and body now. Enjoy, Harold !

Somebody has been posting as "Guest Speaker" in the NY Post comment section and people think it's Markle

I don't think that link worked at r187 but she refers to herself in the first person so people think she slipped up and revealed it was her

Oh the frauness of it all. SQUEEEEE

What's wrong with all you haters? Ms. Markle told Jane Pauley she is pursuing "change for good." Why can't you people get that through your judgmental little minds? Sheesh.

Because all she's offering is an online once-a-month zoom call for parents and she received millions in publicity for this "modest effort."

Yeah, some of those Redditors go off the deep end.

[quote]What's wrong with all you haters? Ms. Markle told Jane Pauley she is pursuing "change for good." Why can't you people get that through your judgmental little minds? Sheesh.

because actions speak louder than words?

Maybe this link will work?

r194 "Guest Speaker" aka Meghan Markle is in the comment section on that article

We can only hope that their next initiative takes on the harm of something really important like, that of misplaced commas.

Two of the most painfully stupid rumors about Megs is that the children don’t exist and that she is writing comments under the name Guest Speaker.

#3 secretly msrried in her teens wirh a child out there somewhere. #4 Mama Doria was in prison 10 years for drug dealing. #5 Meg is a scary international spy backed by shadowy agents

She is an actress, from the first word out of her mouth to the last. And she's a raging narcissist. Do not think that the words she says are remotely related to what she really feels. Judge her by her actions. They demonstrate what she believes.

I can't believe they've stayed together this long - though there are rumors that they live in separate houses (or one in an apartment or hotel, whatever)

As mentioned, she slipped up a couple of times under the name Guest Speaker and spoke in the first person. No I don't have "proof" as I read it a while back and am not going hunting for it.

Redditors also identified Alec Baldwin and his username and were accurate.

Narcissists are so delusional and don't get embarrassed even when they are caught. They just keep the charade going. Neither Meg nor Alec have changed their usernames.

What did Guest Speaker say?

r202, look at r194's link

I wonder if they are as concerned about the dangers of cruelty, lying, grifting, accusing, whining, demanding attention, misrepresenting, and endlesslessly trying to attract the spotlight regardless of how silly they are?

Angelina too got outed for posting

Who is this "Guest Speaker" to whom some of you are referring?

^Meghan posting in the nypost.com comments section.

Dear lord, R207.

That's embarrassing.

How did anyone confirm that it's really her?

I read the Guest Speaker comments. They do have a depersonalized flatness and generalness that is reminiscent of her "anyone can be of service" remark, and they often follow their own narrative instead of responding directly to a previous comment.

[quote] Guest Speaker [quote]1 hour ago

[quote] Retired actress. The "inheritance" is a fiction story. The "demanding wife" image is getting so boring and is sexist.

Actually wouldn’t be surprised if it’s her Duchesship

Maybe a little harm will humble her.

Meghan getting her come-uppance is a guilty pleasure. They're in a cunundrum: they can't diss the royal family because they need to get back in with them (it's where the big money is, it turns out, not in their commercial ventures), but they can't get any attention -- which she desperately needs -- if they don't talk about the royal family. Charles has more money than God and is in his seventies -- was it really wise to insult his wife in print (in Harry's book)? William will have all the power and nearly all of the money -- was it really wise to tell stories about him and Katherine? Harry and Meghan gambled that their commercial enterprises would make them rich but instead, they are floundering and finding, to their chagrin, that after insulting, threatening, and lying about their families, the palace gates are shut.

Looking forward to their Colombia Stately Progress kicking off on Thursday!

Anyone remember these two twats in the leaked footage of them delivering to the doorsteps of the vulnerable during COVID? Or giving out parcels to passing cars while the paps click-clicked? The pandemic really did fuck with their big, splashy exit but they did try! LOL

I don't think they can return to the royal family as a couple. Too much has happened. He might have a shot at it, if Kate survives her cancer and does the heavy lifting to repair the rift between the brothers. Still, it seems very hard to imagine. There's no path back for her and she wouldn't want it. She's obviously learned nothing in the years they've been on their own. If she's smart she's engineering some kind of affair with somebody with money and going to make herself somebody else's problem.

Neither of them will be able to return to the UK as working members of the royal family, even if they do want it, which Harry probably does. Harry, with or without Meghan, can return to the UK to live quietly if he so wishes, but he will never have royal duties ever again.

Malignant Meg convinced halfwit Harry he would be richer and more famous than his brother in the U.S. They would have their own kingdom and they would reign over in U.S. 🤣

She had delusions of grandeur. Being the belle of the ball, high in demand and sought after for every red-carpet event and also of dethroning Martha Stewart.

Meanwhile Harry buys himself awards whereas true Royalty gives out awards.

Meg can't even get Kevin Costner to accept her ridiculous jam and she makes grand entrances through Hertz Rent A Car. Hollywood has "scarfed" her just like Prince William "scarfed" her. 🤣

No one on either side of the pond will ever socialize with them. Aristocrats and celebrities alike don't want their private business to end up in one of the gruesome twosome's next books.

Harold telling the story in his book of how he did magic mushrooms at Courtney Cox's house guaranteed Hollywood types will never invite them to their private parties. Not to mention all the intrusive security that comes with having them around.

Courtney's PR did the right thing and didn't stoop to his level. She put out an innocuous statement that didn't confirm or deny and just said "he's a nice guy" which actually could have been sarcastic.

I find him far more loathsome than her, it's his family he trashed and allowed to be trashed.

William and Kate were part of a video paying tribute to the GB Olympic team. At the end of the clip, Snoop Dogg pays them a compliment.

Well done, Martha. The crockery will be hitting the walls in Montecito.

Remember when Meghan phoned all those senators about parental leave, introducing herself as the DoSussex? Spread all those rumours about running for D seat? Revealed her ambition to be POTUS?

Now she doesn't even have stocks of jam or dog biscuits to actually sell. She's no Gwyneth or Martha.

In the clip, William looks hot with a tan and stubble.

[quote] In the clip, William looks hot with a tan and stubble.

Said no one ever.

r221 William is a stud, so sorry if he's not 'teen-beat pretty' enough for you.

What r222 said.

And William has Big Dick Energy for days.

Harry has buddy, can you spare a dime energy.

And another one bites the dust. According to the news site that cannot be linked to from the DL, Josh Kettler - Harry’s Chief of Staff - has resigned after three months in the job.

Not great timing with the Sussexes’ grand royal tour of Colombia coming up on Thursday.

Meghan Markle's American Riviera Orchard Trademark Suffers Minor Setback Due to 'Irregularities'

Meghan Markle's highly anticipated lifestyle brand is facing significant hurdles that may push back its full-scale launch. According to reports, the Duchess of Sussex's application to trademark some of the items she plans to sell was recently stalled due to several "irregularities."

While the extent of the irregularities remains unclear, it was reported that some items, such as yoga blankets and recipe books, were incorrectly classified in the application Meghan submitted to the agency.

Additionally, Meghan is expected to pay $11,382 in fees for the registration of the trademark to various entities if her application is ultimately approved.

Yoga mats? Lol

I was most bulleyed parson in the World,,, Thay calls me a hoar, prints fake nude pix of me an qwestion mine Cizenshipe,,, I fulley unnerstand these parblum,,, Be Best, Prince & Princess!!

R227 Seriously. I couldn't stop laughing. Jam, dog biscuits, wine, now yoga mats?

How 'bout selling bologna that's been thrown at the wall?

Someone on X is reporting that the nature of King Charles' cancer is such that they are taking a "less intervention for better quality of life" approach.

That doesn't sound good....

R230 I just saw that.

R221 William oozes masculinity. Harry Handbag does not.

Does anyone else suspect these dodgy "tours" were a major factor in Dimbo's Chief of Staff quitting? Along with Meghan's outfits, of course.

Something tells me the Chief of Staff left because his employers were delusional, lazy, and relentlessly self absorbed.

[quote]Something tells me the Chief of Staff left because his employers were delusional, lazy, and relentlessly self absorbed.

...and they kept sending him out for Starbucks and yelling at him that he got their order wrong. Additionally, his paycheck always being late or short.

"Chief of Staff" is hilariously pretentious and also right on brand for the Poisonous Pair

As is departing over a question of fit.

I know that interview process... they charm, they say all the right things and the rose colored glasses go straight on, despite what you've heard. Then you start work and by about day two the cracks start.

It's the employment equivalent of OK, he's not the easiest guy but I know I can change him.

If they're trying to prevent dangers of online harm they should consider taking themselves offline.

r85 sounds like she has a psychotic messiah complex.Does she not realize that most people have clocked she aint no Queen of compassion and frankly even coveting that kind of recognition and praise suggests she is firmly stuck in the 1990s.

r88 She wasnt a monarch.

r135 Fergie did at Queen Elizabeths funeral!

I just don't understand why Charles didn't write her a big fat check to go away before the wedding.

I've lost respect for him not being able to handle the situation.

Fuck off Klan cunts

And KGT is back, using one of its sock puppets.

R242

[quote] Fergie did at Queen Elizabeths funeral!

The Queen knew Fergie from the time she was a little girl. And I think despite her divorce from Andrew, Fergie maintained a good relationship with the Queen. (Prince Philip on the other hand....)

And there is a story that when Fergie and Andrew were splitting up , the Queen asked Fergie what she wanted and Fergie replied "Your friendshiip, Ma'am."

Link below to picture of Queen with both Edward and Andrew (his back to the camera) as children and little red headed Fergie facing the camera.

[quote]And there is a story that when Fergie and Andrew were splitting up , the Queen asked Fergie what she wanted and Fergie replied "Your friendshiip, Ma'am."

Myth. She was never that eloquent.

What was the relationship between Diana and Fergie? Were they on good terms or frosty?

I always understood off and on, as with most things involving Diana.

R246 I always assumed that the "your friendship, ma'am" story was put about by Fergie to mak up for the fact that she was fucking stupid and done over by the BRF in the divorce settlement from her clod of a husband. Trust funds for the children, as it should be, but she got a payoff based on her husband being an ex Navy man living on a navy chopper pilot's pension - i.e., by their standards, nothing.

I recall Fergie going on Oprah and complaining the housing she was offered by the Queen after the divorce didn't have proper heat or electricity or plumbing (I don't recall which exactly) and saying: "Can you imagine, Her Majesty the Queen's grandchildren not having proper heat/electricity/plumbing?" and Oprah doing her shocked face like she did with Harold and Meg.

[quote] Oprah doing her shocked face like she did with Harold and Meg.

His real name is HENRY.

Henry Charles Albert David.

HARRY is his nickname.

No one calls him HAROLD.

Do try and keep up, R251

[quote]Someone on X is reporting that the nature of King Charles' cancer is such that they are taking a "less intervention for better quality of life" approach.

If based in any facts at all, this could be just a misinterpretation of an approach commonly taken for older people with less aggressive cancers, which is to let you "die with it, not necessarily of it".

[quote] Kate Middleton "Anxious" and "Triggered" By Meghan Markle

As the royal family rift has deepened, multiple reports have emerged discussing Princess Kate and Prince William's feelings on the matter. For instance, one source suggested Kate and William felt "pettiness" and "jealousy" when it came to Meghan Markle's popularity. Yet another source claimed that Kate Middleton and Prince William found the so-called rivalry with Prince Harry and Duchess Meghan "frustrating." Now, a new article is reporting that Kate and William are taking a break from all things Meghan and Harry for the next few weeks.

In the new Heatworld report, an alleged "insider" claimed that Kate and William are avoiding any talk of the Sussexes while they vacation in Balmoral for the summer. Most importantly, the moratorium is reportedly in place because William doesn't want Kate to experience any unnecessary stress or anxiety while she continues cancer treatment.

"Kate’s still very much focusing on her healing, and they decided to create a firm boundary to protect her from all the stress and upset Harry and Meghan create, which understandably has a negative impact on her physical health, as well as her mental health," the source claimed. As a result, "Kate and William have put a self-imposed ban on anything Meghan and Harry-related, as they take time out to enjoy some much-needed respite and family time."

According to Heatworld, Prince William has been firm about the ban in order to protect his wife, who revealed her cancer diagnosis earlier this year. "William was sick and tired of seeing how triggered and anxious Kate would become every time Meghan and Harry would do or say something that negatively impacted them—no matter how subtle—and as soon as he suggested it, Kate agreed it was vital for them all," the source claimed.

Jesus, Oprah is a fucking vulture. If the worst Fergie said about ERII was the state of housing she provided Fergie and girls with, that's pretty pissweak. Fergie's toe-sucking *financial adviser* did try to market her as...someone, but nobody apart from Oprah and her hags w terribly interested. She inspired the acronym NGOB: Not Good on Beaches after the topless display by the pool.

Meghan, in avenging Diana mode, tried to eviscerate the BRF in one Oprah interview. What is really weird is that Harry claimed his mother had wanted out and that the Harkles were following in her footsteps.

When paranoid Di did the Bashir interview, she wasn't well. Bashir had lied to her and she was scared and irrational. She certainly got a hell of a shock after the show aired to be informed by ERII that she would be divorcing Charles and leaving the BRF. She had tried to leverage her vulnerability with viewers and got booted, which still seems like a good move on the BRF's behalf. Bashir got to her through her brother, who doesn't seem very smart or stable himself.

[quote]In the new Heatworld report, an alleged "insider"

Could there be any less inspiring words in one sentence?

Guest Speaker speaking in the first person.

Because Guest Speaker is responding to someone who said "you're just jealous" to him/her, r257. When talking about Meghan, however, he/she refers to her in the third person.

Guest Speaker is just another megalomanic Sussex stan.

All the people taunting Guest Speaker address her as if she's Meghan. There's a lot of people who really pile shit on her.

I didn't find Joe Rogan ripping into Dimbo to be particularly funny. Was it supposed to be?

Rogan is Deplorable so I wouldn't listen to him anyway

Joe Rogaine.

R260, I've never heard any of his content before, don't know a great deal about him except for his stupid covid Vax comments.

However, it was definitely stupid of the Harkles to take issue about his covid vax views given that they were not able to produce content for Spotify that kicked any goals.

This Colombia visit would be the perfect opportunity to talk about their new cause.

Especially with all the teenagers they will meet.

They are apparently also going to be building bridges while in Colombia - looking forward to that! I’ll bet that Meghan has a delightful one shouldered-done-up bib & brace overall for these events. Teamed with a Gianvinito Rossi strappy sandal.

And a wrench.

Which new cause would that be, R263? It can be a challenge to keep up as causes are picked up then quickly discarded.

I wonder if there are complimentary lines on their bedside tables in the hotel presidential suite.

What awards will likely be given to them in Colombia?

Once again she wore something skimpy and inappropriate. I don't know why she wants to show off those sunken boobs.

The Order of the Platinum Tiffany Coke Straw - First Class, R267.

For madame. The Duke will have to wait.

Jam and yoga mats for all the poor, disadvantaged Colombian orphans.

Her acting "skills" are on full display when she takes a meaningful pause, while talking about her kids, to utter "They're amazing." With the beneficient faraway smile of glowing motherhood.

Her step brother (yes I know they are all loony) said don't trust Meghan around small children or animals. I really think she and Harry are too Narcissistic to be decent parents.

Why does she so often wear outfits that accentuate her B-R-O-A-D shoulders in a butch way

She cringes when Harry speaks, she wants the attention on her but I think she also knows Harry is a dim bulb.

He's so dense and ugly. Without the Ozempic and cosmetic procedures, she wouldn't be much better looking than Harry. Between his Oedipus complex/Mummy issues (how many 40-odd adults call their mothers Mummy?), drug use and hygiene issues, he can't be fun. He needs the drugs to deal with her.

Who is her step-brother, r272?

r276 oops I think it is actually her half-brother, Thomas Markle Junior

[quote] Her acting "skills" are on full display when she takes a meaningful pause, while talking about her kids, to utter "They're amazing."

I'M NOT ACTING!!!

KLAN GRANNIES

When are they going to weigh in on the Harm of Online Dangers?

Oh look, it’s the Klan Granny troll R279 - hi KGT!

She looks like she's cosplaying Dowton Abbey on equestrian day.

Gladys Knight was/is criminally underrated.

She's completely grotesque; I can only chalk that up to how disingenuous and phony she is. There simply is no "there" there. I'm not sure whether she even remembers who she is/was. She makes Angelina Jolie look authentic. Say what you will about Gwyneth Paltrow, whose "lifestyle brand" the "duchess" is clearly trying to emulate, but you know what you're getting with Gwyneth. She completely owns who she is, makes no apologies for it, and has a sense of humor. I won't be burning a vagina candle anytime soon, but bless her.

R283 You might have taken a wrong turn, sweetness. The most overrated/underrated thread is thataway!

ooops!

[QUOTE] There simply is no "there" there.

Accurate description of vapid Kate. It's not a description of Meghan though. If it was, you hags would not have been here every day for nearly a decade screaming about how much you hate her.

I, for one, don’t hate Meghan, R287 - I love the entertainment value that she unintentionally provides. She’s an absolute hoot!

[quote] Accurate description of vapid Kate.

Kate is supposed to be vapid, r287. Vapid is in the job description to be Queen.

And, as vapid goes, she's excellent.

I admire the hell out of her.

She wanted the man and the job. She went after both. She got them, and, as far as I can see, she hasn't put one nude-toned stiletto heeled foot wrong.

[quote] I admire the hell out of her.

[quote] She wanted the man and the job. She went after both. She got them, and, as far as I can see, she hasn't put one nude-toned stiletto heeled foot wrong.

Me too!

Victim blaming. Class. Meghan's highest rated poddy was on victim blaming, wasn't it? Or was that the one on privacy?

R290 you’re comparing a woman going topless by a pool (something very common outside suburban USA) with Melania Trump pretending to be a lesbian and sticking her finger up her twat in a nude photo shoot?

Fuck there are some parochials on this board.

Epic fail, r290.

I don't despise Melania for entering into whatever transactions and terms she entered with Trump when she met and married him. It's her body and she can do whatever she wants with it.

Besides, when it comes to whoring, Donald Trump has her beat by a mile.

I despise Melania because she's a bigoted birther and grifter.

And Kate topless?

Let's see.... I put my shocked face around here somewhere.

Klan Granny at R293 would probably create 100 threads in a day, and fill them with 600 posts each, if Meghan ever had nudes out there.

Go fuck yourself, you fake cunt.

You are so full of SHIT!

Hi KGT!

Stable.

Au contraire, R294 - if Meghan’s nudes were published I’d be doing everything that I could to avoid them.

She’s bad enough to look at when fully, badly clothed.

Man, you're losing it, r294.

Anytime you have to resort to name-calling, you're losing the argument.

As for Markle nudes, at this point, given their tepid moves at relevancy, those would be a career boon for her, an interesting move by her.

I've actually argued a million times she should go back to an acting career. I bet with the right script and an experienced writing and producing team, she could be an anti-hero villain or, even an outright one, and be a hit.

R298, the troll at R294 only has a couple of insults: “cunt”, “Klan Granny” and…well, that’s about it, so they’re in high rotation.

It is best ignored, or make judicious use of the FF button when the nastiness and aggression reach their peak, which happens about once per week.

Well warned, r299.

Thanks.

More rumblings that King Charles is actually sicker than the public is being led to believe and just being made comfortable at this point...

Rumblings = online rando claims to have "tea".

It should be noted that the public isn't being led to believe anything in particular beyond the fact that the King is undergoing continuing treatment.

[quote] It should be noted that the public isn't being led to believe anything in particular beyond the fact that the King is undergoing continuing treatment.

Interesting.

Your so very carefully worded statement seems to confirm exactly what R301 is saying.

In your attempt to be a massive cunt, you seem to have showed your cards.

Looks like R301 is telling the truth.

Don't they understand how loathed they are to most of the world? I'm sure they are followed by a small faction of Millennials who worship wealth and anything foreign. But almost no one wants to hear or see them anywhere.

Twit at r303, I wasn't carefully wording anything. As for my supposedly "confirming" "information", I don't pretend to have any "insider information", like r301 does. All I pointed out is that the general public in Britain is not being "comforted" into thinking Charles has been cured of cancer and that all we are told is that his treatment is continuing. There has never been any claim that the King is now cancer free or that he's doing perfectly fine.

I saw one of the self-proclaimed "royal" influencer twitter accounts claim to have "insider tea" that Charles is "sicker" than is being made out, but given that he is not being made out to be either particularly well or particularly sick, that's a non-statement.

R246. Diana was smarter in this area. She wanted more than “friendship” and got it. Good for her.

But Andrew did not have any money of his own so there was no money of Andrew's that Fergie could ask for. Completely different from the Charles/Diana split as Charles did have money of his own as Prince of Wales (also Duke of Cornwall).

If she’d been clever (yeah I know - it’s Fergie) she could have extracted some decent hush money considering all that she saw, although admittedly she was drunk for most of the marriage.

So now she’s tied to Andrew for life - free rent in exchange for keeping her gaping maw shut for once.

I mean, how stupid are the higher ups in Colombia to think that Harry and Meghan actually have any power to be of any kind of assistance to Colombia?

It's about mutual public relations, r309.

[quote] So now she’s tied to Andrew for life - free rent in exchange for keeping her gaping maw shut for once.

Fergie doesn't really need the free rent, since she also has her own place in the Mayfair area that she bought a couple years ago. Tattler reported she uses it as a city residence when she has to go talk business about her entrepreneurial pursuits. One tabloid (cant recall which one) joked that if Andrew ever gets evicted from Royal Lodge he might have to go there and stay with her. ..lol.

I highly doubt that Fergie stumped up the £5m for the place in Mayfair.

[quote]What was the relationship between Diana and Fergie? Were they on good terms or frosty?

Frosty at the end, Fergie had written about catching plantar warts from borrowing Diana's shoes and Di wasn't speaking to her.

When Diana died, she was on the outs with her mother and at least one of her sisters. The brother who convinced her to do the Bashir interview declined her request to live at Althorp.

And she was holidaying with the Al Fayeds.

Sounds like his friend is fed up.

3,000 police, snipers and a bio terror van follow the couple's every move in Columbia, despite barely anyone turning up to see Harry and Meghan

Sounds like wonderful mutual "public relations," eh?

Meghan Markle would ‘like’ to appear at Democratic National Convention — but her influence is ‘at rock bottom’

Seriously, what relevance would she have to the Democratic convention? Never mind the absurdity of a Duchess appearing as part of a democratic process.

[quote]3,000 police, snipers and a bio terror van follow the couple's every move in Columbia, despite barely anyone turning up to see Harry and Meghan

bwhahahaha, they're such pinheads! I'm sure they're feeling chuffed at their own self-importance. What a travelling clown-show!

R315 and R318 are garbage articles.

Hit jobs put out on Harry and Meghan by the British tabloid rags.

No quoted sources. Just hearsay. Like everything else printed in those garbage rags.

The British "press" cannot be trusted.

Little Meghan Markle, so desperate to be important!

People are noticing that Harry's Translator (the women sitting in the chair that Harry is resting his arm on) suddenly disappeared for H&M's final engagements.

R321 Gurl, give it a break. Get your head out of your ass and do some research to find that both the legit US and UK press have called out H&M for their repeated lies, "trouble" keeping friends, family, and staff.

[quote]People are noticing that Harry's Translator (the women sitting in the chair that Harry is resting his arm on) suddenly disappeared for H&M's final engagements.

I had her CANCELLED!

Harold was just glad to meet someone who didn't bark orders at him for a change

r321 How very Trumpian calling fake news on anything unfavourable

He needs to lose the big gut on display at r323.

I am so sick of that stupid nail necklace she wears. It's like she wants to evoke the crucifixion of Christ FFS because she's such a spiritual warrior and martyr. What a tasteless cunt.

Vogue still cashing their cheques.

He's got the gunt and the very skinny legs. What does that mean at age 40? Typical aging, alcohol abuse, drugs?

Besides lifting his elbow, do we think Harry works out at all?

In Style magazine online is breathlessly talking about Meg's outfits on this tour. I can see why their publication went out of print.

What agency is she with theses days? They sure are getting the puff pieces out right on cue. Surely they are down-low satirical articles; they are transparently ridiculous in their praise.

R330, I know a woman in her 40s with that shape. She lives on alcohol and ADHD medication. Not much food and absolutely no exercise.