Why Won't Daring Directors Allow Willem Dafoe's Enormous Penis To Be Captured On Film?

Ahem. Excuse me?

Here's a video clip. It looks bigger than average but pretty normal and not freakish.

R2 what is the context of that clip?

Why did the lady at R2 want to show her hairy pussy, but not her fat tits?

It's usually the other way around.

He’s a great actor, but his cock doesn’t make up for that face.

OP, he’s full frontal on the cross in The Last Temptation of Christ.

I want to see the footage that preview audiences laughed at of Costner’s full frontal in For the Love of the Game. Apparently it was so huge it was nervous laughter.

Also, we should’ve seen more of Liam Neeson’s impressive appendage during his prime. It swung.

Didn't we see his cock in that movie with Madonna?

[quote] I want to see the footage that preview audiences laughed at of Costner’s full frontal in For the Love of the Game. Apparently it was so huge it was nervous laughter.

And let me guess “someone fainted.”

"After Antichrist was released, von Trier revealed in an interview that Willem Dafoe actually needed a double for his sex scenes because his penis was so large that everyone in the room got confused. The famous scene where the penis ejaculates blood actually had someone else’s penis in the frame as the director felt Dafoe’s appendage was too large.

Lars von Trier explained that Dafoe’s character practises some contentious psychotherapy in the film, claiming: “I wouldn’t let him treat her in any other way than with his dick, he has an enormous dick, but that maybe I took also…he’s extremely well-equipped. And we had to kind of take the scenes out of the film, we had a stand-in for him, we had to take the scenes out with his own dick.”"

Willem Dafoe's penis is perfectly intact.

So Von Trier hates women and big dicks.