Is, how you say—justice, no?
Baldwin case dismissed
by Anonymous | reply 72 | July 16, 2024 9:46 PM |
This was planned from the beginning.
by Anonymous | reply 2 | July 12, 2024 10:28 PM |
Not a fan of Baldwin's, but I think this was a fair decision.
by Anonymous | reply 3 | July 12, 2024 10:30 PM |
Yes, glad he wasn’t convicted.
There might have been some sort of politicization of this case.
Anyway, glad he’s free to go.
by Anonymous | reply 4 | July 12, 2024 10:30 PM |
Shuppreshed evidenshe.
by Anonymous | reply 5 | July 12, 2024 10:31 PM |
His career won’t recover.
by Anonymous | reply 6 | July 12, 2024 10:31 PM |
Dismissed WITH prejudice.
by Anonymous | reply 7 | July 12, 2024 10:33 PM |
So the prosecutors have to decide whether to retry?
by Anonymous | reply 8 | July 12, 2024 10:34 PM |
Of course it will recover
John Landis killed a veteran actor and two children and he went on to direct many more films.
by Anonymous | reply 9 | July 12, 2024 10:34 PM |
So the prosecutors have to decide whether to retry?
Can they if it's WITH prejudice?
by Anonymous | reply 10 | July 12, 2024 10:35 PM |
Prosecutors cannot retry the case. It's over.
by Anonymous | reply 11 | July 12, 2024 10:36 PM |
R10, no, it’s a final judgment. They can’t retry him.
by Anonymous | reply 12 | July 12, 2024 10:37 PM |
No, you can't retry if the judge dismissed WITH prejudice. Yes, the criminal case is over.
by Anonymous | reply 13 | July 12, 2024 10:37 PM |
Thanks, r12, that's what I thought.
by Anonymous | reply 14 | July 12, 2024 10:39 PM |
He and Hilaria will have to celebrate by ordering up another baby.
by Anonymous | reply 15 | July 12, 2024 10:40 PM |
Fuck him…and others are right: I see a celebratory baby in the near future, by surrogate, ‘cause that very, very Spanish lady’s womb is damned tired.
by Anonymous | reply 16 | July 12, 2024 10:48 PM |
I thought the thread about this would have 200 replies by now. I don't like Alec Baldwin, but didn't feel like he should have been convicted. The prosecution was hiding evidence from the defense, this prosecution was a quest for fame for the prosecutor so they could run for higher office in my opinion.
by Anonymous | reply 17 | July 12, 2024 11:36 PM |
As others, I think Alec is a jerk but the criminal prosecution was excessive. He will likely pay big in a civil suit.
by Anonymous | reply 18 | July 12, 2024 11:45 PM |
The prosecution probably assumed that just because most people think Alec Baldwin is an asshole, it would be a winnable case. It was always going to be a hard case, even with an unlikable defendant.
At least now we can stop pretending to be experts on gun safety procedures in film production.
by Anonymous | reply 19 | July 12, 2024 11:45 PM |
I've worked on many films and tv shows where we have working guns. Technically, Alex is right- the whole crew trusts that the armorer and the 1st AD will have cleared the weapons. We always have a safety meeting with the Armorer, and they explain what type the gun (live or dummy) is and what types of "ammo" (blanks, flashes or none) are being used. Then when the gun is on set, the !st AD will shout that the gun is on set, will check the chambers, show the crew the chambers, and if the weapon is hot or cold. Then the 1st AD will shout prior to a take that we are shooting with a hot weapon.
It's really the fault of the armorer and the !st AD on this production.
by Anonymous | reply 20 | July 12, 2024 11:53 PM |
[quote]Yes, glad he wasn’t convicted.
He wasn’t even tried. Which is appropriate, because it’s beyond obvious that he wasn’t guilty of any crime.
by Anonymous | reply 21 | July 12, 2024 11:57 PM |
Of course it is the right decision, that it went so far is astonishing and troubling. And other than the hairry chest from Working Girl i am not a fan of his.
by Anonymous | reply 22 | July 12, 2024 11:59 PM |
The MAGATs were so desperately hoping for a guilty verdict since Baldwin made fun of Dear Leader
by Anonymous | reply 23 | July 13, 2024 12:00 AM |
Baldwin would never intentionally kill someone. Correct decision.
by Anonymous | reply 24 | July 13, 2024 12:01 AM |
He didn't get off because he did nothing wrong, he got off because the prosecution fucked up.
by Anonymous | reply 25 | July 13, 2024 12:06 AM |
This is the only logical outcome.
by Anonymous | reply 26 | July 13, 2024 12:37 AM |
Bad day for Trump. He's behind this.
by Anonymous | reply 27 | July 13, 2024 12:45 AM |
Score so far...Trump 34, Balwin 0.
by Anonymous | reply 28 | July 13, 2024 12:51 AM |
the hairy chest also makes a memorable appearance in 1990 Miami Blues.
by Anonymous | reply 29 | July 13, 2024 1:14 AM |
Yeah R2, by the idiot prosecutors.
Good.
Fucking GOOD.
by Anonymous | reply 30 | July 13, 2024 1:37 AM |
R25, that “technicality,” the failure of the prosecution to disclose evidence, is serious.
by Anonymous | reply 31 | July 13, 2024 2:05 AM |
It’s celebrity justice. Celebrities get to be above the law. He should have been found guilty.
by Anonymous | reply 32 | July 13, 2024 2:12 AM |
Good. I don’t like to see somebody railroaded just cause they’re a cunt personality wise. Ol big booty ass Baldwin.
by Anonymous | reply 33 | July 13, 2024 2:21 AM |
It was WILD watching today. Gross prosecutoral misconduct. It got so bad, the corrupt prosecutor took the stand (out of the presence of the jury) and on cross was asked questions like "do you recall calling Mr. Baldwin a 'cocksucker' who was ' going to get his'"
I actually believe the conviction of Hamnah Guiteriz may be in danger now.
Watch a summary of it on youtube. It was crazy.
by Anonymous | reply 34 | July 13, 2024 2:27 AM |
[QUOTE]and on cross was asked questions like "do you recall calling Mr. Baldwin a 'cocksucker' who was ' going to get his'"
Are you joking?!
by Anonymous | reply 35 | July 13, 2024 2:30 AM |
These prosecutors were like Dumb and Dumber.
by Anonymous | reply 36 | July 13, 2024 2:30 AM |
This is confusing. Why did the armorer's stepfather's friend have this live ammo evidence and why did he wait until after Gutierrez-Reed's trial to bring it to the DA's office? And why didn't the crime scene technicians remove it from the set?
[QUOTE]The dispute over evidence arose Thursday when Santa Fe County Sheriff’s Office crime scene technician Marissa Poppell testified under cross-examination that a “good Samaritan” had come to authorities with ammunition earlier this year.
[QUOTE]The Colt .45 rounds were delivered to the sheriff’s office in March by Troy Teske, a former police officer and friend of Thell Reed, the stepfather of “Rust” armorer Hannah Gutierrez-Reed, the same day she was convicted of involuntary manslaughter in Hutchins’ death (She was later sentenced to 18 months behind bars.)
by Anonymous | reply 37 | July 13, 2024 2:39 AM |
@R18 - I think he already paid off the widower and kid not long after it happened. I think he just has the relatives represented by Gloria Allred left to deal with.
by Anonymous | reply 38 | July 13, 2024 2:44 AM |
Apparently, the widower and their child haven't been paid yet. What a mess.
by Anonymous | reply 39 | July 13, 2024 2:49 AM |
R39 She always reminds me of that actress who was in the Daniel Powter Bad Day video, she also used to be in stuff but I can’t remember what.
by Anonymous | reply 40 | July 13, 2024 2:53 AM |
Something like this happened in California years ago IIRC. A group of police officers were practicing some SWAT thing, like rescuing hostages or swarming a building when the guy who was supposed to check everyone's firearm to be sure they were unloaded missed a handgun and an officer was shot and killed. I never heard what happened after that.
by Anonymous | reply 41 | July 13, 2024 3:45 AM |
He should never have gone to trial. It was an accident.
by Anonymous | reply 43 | July 13, 2024 4:09 AM |
So he’s just free to kill again now?
by Anonymous | reply 44 | July 13, 2024 4:26 AM |
by Anonymous | reply 45 | July 13, 2024 4:47 AM |
[quote] [R25], that “technicality,” the failure of the prosecution to disclose evidence, is serious.
Yeah, the Constitution is not a technicality. I can't find Thurgood Marshall's quote on that.
by Anonymous | reply 46 | July 13, 2024 4:55 AM |
[quote]R37 This is confusing. Why did the armorer's stepfather's friend have this live ammo evidence and why did he wait until after Gutierrez-Reed's trial to bring it to the DA's office? And why didn't the crime scene technicians remove it from the set?
I agree that it's confusing. Deadline's detailed article didn't explain it very well (or I'm just too slow to get it). I don't get what happened there, but apparently prosecutors thought the new "evidence" had nothing to do with this case, but why withhold it from the defense? Just get it ruled out legally and move on. Strange.
by Anonymous | reply 47 | July 13, 2024 5:03 AM |
Is there anyone who doesn't think a few years in prison would have done him a lot of good?
by Anonymous | reply 48 | July 13, 2024 5:05 AM |
18 months, maybe.
by Anonymous | reply 49 | July 13, 2024 5:12 AM |
He's an entitled, overbearing asshat. And I'm not a Trumptard, Repug or whatever...I'm a liberal.
I don't like this guy at all. He displayed no decorum in the aftermath of the death. At all. Not in the least.
He was a Exec Producer and he DOES bear some responsibility. I heard he ran an unsafe set and didn't listen to complaints. I also heard he and other staff went target shooting during the shooting of this film.
So...I do think there was some substance to this case. They also showed there was NO WAY this gun could have fired without him pulling the trigger. He lied about that.
by Anonymous | reply 50 | July 13, 2024 5:14 AM |
Hilaria celebrated by shooting another baby out of her snatch.
by Anonymous | reply 51 | July 13, 2024 5:56 AM |
Her pussy must be the size of grand canyon after all those babies
by Anonymous | reply 52 | July 13, 2024 6:09 AM |
Can E-Laria even conjure up the correct English words to express her happiness over this verdict??
by Anonymous | reply 53 | July 13, 2024 6:11 AM |
Yes, the involuntary manslaughter case against Alec Baldwin has been dismissed1. The judge ruled that the prosecution had suppressed evidence, leading to the dismissal with prejudice, meaning Baldwin cannot be retried for the same charge12. Justice can be complex and subjective, often depending on one’s perspective. In this case, the legal system determined that the suppression of evidence warranted dismissal.
by Anonymous | reply 54 | July 13, 2024 6:11 AM |
These prosecutors wasted tons of taxpayer money on a case they badly fucked up and never went to trial. The DA should be voted out.
by Anonymous | reply 55 | July 13, 2024 6:24 AM |
Like OJ Simpson, Baldwin will no doubt commit a crime in the future and he'll be nailed then, we can hope.
by Anonymous | reply 56 | July 13, 2024 6:28 AM |
[quote]I heard he ran an unsafe set and didn't listen to complaints. I also heard he and other staff went target shooting during the shooting of this film.
You heard, you heard, well then let's convict!
by Anonymous | reply 57 | July 13, 2024 9:23 AM |
[quote]It’s celebrity justice. Celebrities get to be above the law. He should have been found guilty.
Thanks for your legal insights, Clarence Darrow.
by Anonymous | reply 58 | July 13, 2024 11:29 AM |
He’ll feel like he’s invincible now and will definitely kill again.
by Anonymous | reply 59 | July 13, 2024 12:42 PM |
If that movie is ever finished, I wonder if it will be a commercial success. Will people who don't even like Alec go to see it just for the novelty. Can't see it getting any awards, that would just be in horrible taste but will it make money?
by Anonymous | reply 60 | July 13, 2024 4:23 PM |
If the prosecutor was hiding evidence, then this is a just outcome, under the circumstances.
I don't think AB is a serial killer, but he has little regard for other human life.
On this interview with George Stephanopoulos (right after he shot and killed Hutchins), Alec goes off on tangents about the magic of creating movies. He is so full of himself and his importance. I don't think he cared that much that he took a life. Yes, he cared, but not like how you or I would care if we accidentally shot and killed someone.
by Anonymous | reply 61 | July 13, 2024 5:13 PM |
[quote]If that movie is ever finished, I wonder if it will be a commercial success. Will people who don't even like Alec go to see it just for the novelty. Can't see it getting any awards, that would just be in horrible taste but will it make money?
This was probably the best publicity “Rust” could have hoped for. There will definitely be interest.
by Anonymous | reply 62 | July 13, 2024 5:23 PM |
I want to see Rust now!!!
by Anonymous | reply 63 | July 13, 2024 5:29 PM |
According to the link in R39, they haven't found a buyer yet. I wonder if potential buyers want to wait until the lawsuits are over.
by Anonymous | reply 64 | July 13, 2024 6:12 PM |
Verdict aside, is it customary for Defendants to get up in the middle of proceedings and leave to get a cup of coffee and then saunter back in?
Could I do that and it be acceptable?
I thought you couldn't even go to the bathroom let alone get coffee.
by Anonymous | reply 65 | July 13, 2024 6:39 PM |
I don't care what he does, I've never spent a penny on his projects coz he called someone "fagg*t" more than once.
he can go fuck himself.
by Anonymous | reply 66 | July 13, 2024 11:02 PM |
R66 you really care that he said faggot? Who gives a fuck? The guys from Long Island.
Btw I'm a gay male. Get thicker skin, Marybelle.
by Anonymous | reply 67 | July 13, 2024 11:48 PM |
r17 "could run for higher office in my opinion. "
You have higher offices up in your opinion?
by Anonymous | reply 68 | July 13, 2024 11:51 PM |
[Quote]Only other loathsome people support him.
Take it down a notch, Brenda. The justice system worked,, that's all.
I hope he gets booked for the villain role on an episode of Elsbeth. Love that show.
by Anonymous | reply 70 | July 14, 2024 7:32 AM |
Elsbeth insists upon itself, R70.
It insists upon itself
by Anonymous | reply 71 | July 14, 2024 1:23 PM |
R34 Baldwin’s reaction to being called a cocksucker is an instant meme
by Anonymous | reply 72 | July 16, 2024 9:46 PM |