Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Why were there so many serial killers in the 1960s through 1980s?

And then they just disappeared?

by Anonymousreply 27August 4, 2024 4:23 PM

Violent crime statistics nosedived after leaded gasoline was banned.

by Anonymousreply 1June 16, 2024 9:18 AM

The baby boomers lost their fucking minds.

by Anonymousreply 2June 16, 2024 9:24 AM

That's right, R1. And who was affected by that leaded gas?

by Anonymousreply 3June 16, 2024 9:26 AM

Everyone born before or after the mid 1920s was exposed to tetraethyl lead until the late 1980s r3. I remember gas station TV ads about "lead free fuel that performs as well as leaded".

by Anonymousreply 4June 16, 2024 9:50 AM

Drug culture.

by Anonymousreply 5June 16, 2024 10:41 AM

They haven’t disappeared. They’ve just gotten better at hiding the bodies.

by Anonymousreply 6June 16, 2024 10:46 AM

It used to be a lot easier to get away with murder before DNA testing became available in 1986. I'm sure there were many truck drivers and other men who killed prostitutes rather than pay them. Any crazy idiot could choke someone and dump them in the woods somewhere. Now you have cell phones, DNA, and security cameras everywhere, it's a lot harder to cover your tracks.

Current estimate is 2k serial killers remain at large

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 7June 16, 2024 10:47 AM

1986? DNA testing was first used to convict a murderer in 1978.

by Anonymousreply 8June 16, 2024 11:54 AM

R7 said it. Thread closed

by Anonymousreply 9June 16, 2024 12:10 PM

R8

I’m unable to find anything that proves your statement but there are plenty of links to a 1978 murder that was recently solved using DNA. Could that be what you’re thinking of?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 10June 16, 2024 12:34 PM

People are lazier and less motivated these days...serial killing seems like way too much work for the modern young folk, plus they dont have their own spaces to dismember victims in their bath..if their place even has room for a bath. And even if they started it they wouldnt stick with it, no staying power...so couldn't have the full serial killer status. . . Im kidding of course, but not really.

by Anonymousreply 11June 16, 2024 12:37 PM

First murder conviction with DNA was in '87 and of course correlates with the drop off. You'd have to be awfully smart to keep up with the technology and plot and plan effectively to cover the crime. A lot of criminals just don't have the brain power. Also, it's just about impossible to live off-the-grid, pay cash for everything, and not be known, not leave a paper or electronic trail unless they commit to being homeless.

As far as having fewer serial killers before the 60s, I don't believe it's the case (per capita). Do we have any reason to believe there were fewer disordered killing perverts back then? Interdepartmental communication and coordination was more difficult and rare back then so connecting cases was difficult to impossible. The further you go back, there was probably a lot of naivete and disbelief that such monsters could exist so the possibility was probably not contemplated by a lot of police

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 12June 16, 2024 12:45 PM

Serial killers were not so easily identified before the 60s and were much more easily caught early after the 80s, hence the 'golden age'.

by Anonymousreply 13June 16, 2024 12:48 PM

[quote] I'm sure there were many truck drivers and other men who killed prostitutes rather than pay them.

Because it's so much easier to kill someone than to pay them.

by Anonymousreply 14June 16, 2024 12:52 PM

This is why.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 15June 16, 2024 12:54 PM

Because they were driven to kill by encoded messages in The Lucy Show and Here's Lucy.

by Anonymousreply 16June 16, 2024 1:20 PM

Dna testing started in the Ninties.

by Anonymousreply 17June 16, 2024 1:27 PM

I also believe the internet gives potential serial killers and rapists an outlet for their psychopathic aggression which they didn’t have back then.

by Anonymousreply 18June 16, 2024 1:32 PM

I think there are plenty of serial killers out there. We just have not found them yet. A lot of crimes go unsolved and unlinked.

by Anonymousreply 19June 16, 2024 1:43 PM

R18 is on to something. The free and omnipresent availability of pornography online has surely diverted plenty of would-be violent sex criminals, up to and including some would-be serial killers. Advances in surveillance & forensic tech make getting away with those crimes more difficult as well.

by Anonymousreply 20June 16, 2024 1:56 PM

bump

by Anonymousreply 21August 4, 2024 2:32 PM

Cell phones.

by Anonymousreply 22August 4, 2024 2:35 PM

In addition, the interstate highway system likely played a role in the rise of serial killers during that period.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 23August 4, 2024 2:39 PM

A combination of factors. Easy pickings. Young kids were hitchhiking all over. Forensics was still in its infancy. Less technology in general.

by Anonymousreply 24August 4, 2024 2:56 PM

[quote]Why were there so many serial killers in the 1960s through 1980s?

It was the dawning of the Age of Aquarius.

Age of Aquariu-us.

Aquarius.

Aquarius.

by Anonymousreply 25August 4, 2024 3:26 PM

So there were a number of factors, some of which have already been menionted above:

1) DNA testing has advanced so it's much easier to catch killers now.

2) The creation of the interstate system made it much easier to kill people and then escape from the jurisdiction.

3) Before computers became widespread, it was much harder for various law enforcement agencies to share information.

4) Until the rules changed in the 80s, many law enforcement agencies would become very protective of murder cases that happened within their jurisdiction, and would resist working with other agencies who were trying to solve the cases.

Some of the smarter serial killers like Ted Bundy especially exploited #2, #3, and #4. He purposefully killed women from state to state and from jurisdiction to jurisdiction so the law agencies would have more trouble getting their acts together to catch him.

by Anonymousreply 26August 4, 2024 4:17 PM

Abortion is the biggest factor in less crime.

by Anonymousreply 27August 4, 2024 4:23 PM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!