Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Can renting "forever" allow you to create a solid financial future?

Moving back and forth from Tennessee to Alaska, Michael Rogers and his wife Christy have twice been stuck simultaneously paying a mortgage and rent. Once, in 2006, the situation dragged on for eight months, finally ending when they sold their house in Tennessee for $20,000 below what they’d paid for it.

Other adventures in homeownership ended well — the couple doubled their money after selling a fixer-upper. Then later, with another property, they had to pay out $30,000 to fix a mudslide around their home, a mistake caused by the builder.

Two years ago, the Rogerses moved to Kingsport, in northeastern Tennessee, where they signed a lease on an apartment they thought would be a yearlong stopgap before buying again.

The couple just renewed their lease for a third year, and have decided to remain renters for good. Michael Rogers, a construction manager, likes the convenience of being able to move when a job calls.

Either by choice or by being priced out of the market, many people have decided that renting forever is their best — or only — option. Housing costs and interest rates have risen in the past few years, and it can make financial sense to rent. (The New York Times has recently updated its popular rent-versus-buy calculator to help people understand the trade-offs.) In the 1960s, the median house price was a little more than twice as much as the average income. It’s now nearly six times as much.

Homeownership is a traditional strategy for long-term wealth building. For people who aren’t planning to buy, creating a strong financial plan without building home equity requires a different mindset.

Owning a home isn’t a magic bullet to secure retirement. Rogers has seen how being “house poor” has affected older family members, one of whom has three-quarters of her net worth tied up in her house. That situation leaves people with the option of borrowing against the equity in their home or selling the home to get at the value within it.

He’s focused on investing instead, preferring the liquidity and stability of the stock market.

“If you’re buying something like a broad-based U.S. stock index, you’re just kind of buying a slice of the entire U.S. economy,” Rogers said. “When you buy a house, your risk is concentrated literally down to one house, in one neighborhood, in one state.”

Rogers has found that people tend to focus on home equity over other factors. He thinks that can be a mistake.

“In the current market, particularly in my area, rent looks like an absolute bargain compared to what houses are selling for now,” he said. “That allows me to really bump up my savings rate. People are like, ‘Well, you’re not building equity.’ Yeah, but I’ve got a 35% savings rate. I’m building investment accounts much faster than I would ever build equity in the house.”

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 5May 20, 2024 12:41 AM

As long as you’re wisely investing the money you would have been paying on a mortgage each week/month then yes it can make sense.

The problem arises if after paying rent you spend everything else or invest unwisely then you’re fucked. I think a lot of people would fall into this area because planning for the future is something they aren’t good at. We tend to think about the now.

Counterpoint, to be fair, the future looks like shit for the planet so why not enjoy what you can right now?

by Anonymousreply 1May 19, 2024 9:55 PM

I'm 53 and have always rented. I regret not buying when I was younger but what I don't regret is always having a manageable rent while at the same time being a strong saver.

I'll be more than fine with liquid financial assets.

by Anonymousreply 2May 19, 2024 9:59 PM

I'm 52, until 10 years ago I rented exclusively. That was helpful as it allowed me to change jobs - after 10 years at one job I did two 2-year stints at different places before leaving for my current job. I bought my parents' house as they could no longer afford the upkeep. I plan to stay at this job until retirement so I'm fine with having a mortgage now. Unfortunately it won't be paid off until well into retirement but I could always downsize.

So far the market has allowed a lot of increase in value but when it's time to sell I'd probably need to move to a lower cost of living area (right now I'm in a close suburb of Boston - prices are crazy).

by Anonymousreply 3May 19, 2024 10:03 PM

Owning a home can be a prison. The taxes, cost of upkeep, HOA dues. Still, I think I make out better than renters in my area who pay $2,200 for a 1bd/1ba. Also, I get the income tax deduction of property taxes and mortgage interest.

by Anonymousreply 4May 19, 2024 10:32 PM

I am 48 and lifelong renter to date. I have been pretty diligent about saving for retirement since I was 30. As of Friday at market close, my retirement accounts total $982,000. I expect to owe taxes on about 60% of my portfolio.

If I want a house, I’ll buy one when I retire and I’ll pay cash for it.

by Anonymousreply 5May 20, 2024 12:41 AM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!