Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Rolling Stone: Best Actor Oscar-Winners of the 21st Century, Ranked Worst to Best

Their updated list on the gentlemen who have taken home the 21st-century gold.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 11March 9, 2024 3:07 PM

For once, I don't have any major quibbles with their list.

by Anonymousreply 1March 1, 2024 7:58 PM

I would have put "There Will Be Blood" last (of those I've seen) rather than first. His character had no development. In general the list makes me think this century's movie acting is impoverished compared to the last one.

by Anonymousreply 2March 1, 2024 8:08 PM

Daniel Day-Lewis in "There Will Be Blood" was as ridiculous and over-the-top as Faye Dunaway in "Mommie Dearest."

Yet he was overpraised and won a second lead Oscar, while she was mocked and awarded with a Razzie.

Go figure!

by Anonymousreply 3March 1, 2024 8:20 PM

I think Will Smith is too high, but other than it's pretty spot on.

by Anonymousreply 4March 1, 2024 8:20 PM

It's a pretty good list. Forget the naysayers, Daniel Day-Lewis in There Will Be Blood was the undeniable choice.

The author mostly resisted the urge to rank the choices based on reputation alone, which authors have a tendency to do. A lesser list would have ranked Denzel Washington much higher and Casey Affleck much lower based on how people feel about those actors.

by Anonymousreply 5March 1, 2024 8:49 PM

Denzel's 2nd Oscar was as big of a joke as Halle's first.

by Anonymousreply 6March 1, 2024 8:51 PM

I would put DDL in "Lincoln" first because that was a type of person I had never genuinely seen anyone play before on the screen (least of all other actors who had played Lincoln). He made Lincoln folksy and patient and resolute, but somewhat at a loss as to how to deal with his nutso wife.

I would not have Russell Crowe in "Gladiator" the top ten. That part just wasn't that interesting.

I would rank Anthony Hopkins in "The Father" at #2 or #3 (giving PSH in "Capote" the other position).

by Anonymousreply 7March 1, 2024 10:03 PM

I see best to worst and worst to best at OP. Is it #1 that’s best or is it #1 that’s worst?

by Anonymousreply 8March 2, 2024 12:02 AM

R8, #1 means best of the lot.

by Anonymousreply 9March 2, 2024 6:05 AM

[italic]Gladiator[/italic] is not that interesting of a part, but that's what makes Crowe so worthy of a best actor award. His talent was essential to making that movie so interesting. I grew up with swords-and-sandals films on TV every weekend. Handsome men but boring movies.

For comparison, watch [italic]Kingdom of Heaven[/italic] from the same director. Orlando Bloom is handsome, but he does not have the talent or charisma to make that movie a hit, despite the fascinating events and places involved.

by Anonymousreply 10March 2, 2024 9:15 AM

USA Today gives their ranking for the last 25 years:

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 11March 9, 2024 3:07 PM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!