Kristen Stewart’s Rollinh Stone cover

I think it’s Transtastic!

[...]

Sexual appropriation.

She's the last person I'd think would get cosmetic surgery at such a young age.

So, has she blamed men for forcing her into this photoshoot?

She looks like a filthy unwashed dyke

Can’t stand this heifer.

She looks like a perverted serial killer.

She looks like she smells unpleasant

[...]

Why wasn’t an asylum-seeking migrant put on the cover in a jockstrap?

haha, I love it. Got DL shook.

Total dyke.

I can’t believe she showed full index finger.

Trash, no class.

So many pearl clutchers.

Everyone was fine with this pose on the cover of RS when it was Eminem or Billy Idol.

Things were better when all us white fags were the class and cultural gatekeepers. Fraus, white trash & ghetto Genderqueer folx have zero taste except for the Taco Bell hitting their tongues at lunch.

R16 ummm no they’re both tacky. We’d like a return to the golden age of Hollywood. No trashy rappers or punk rockers or greasy dykes.

I thought that was that Eliott chick who used to be an Ellen.

Lesbians are good 👍🏻 people

[quote]I thought that was that Eliott chick who used to be an Ellen.

3-2-1 to Stewart announcing that she's trans.

Christian Stewart!

That mullet is a crime against humanity.

No r17, not really. Not at all.

R24 ok whatever you say wokePOCunt

Her jock strap stinks.

Is she transitioning?

She sho is ugly!

She and Emma Corrin should lez up together in their Diana gear

R25 why you mad though 😬😬😬😬😬😬

Facially all I see is Mary Kay Letourneau with a butch haircut

Oh you old church ladies! I have a pic of my ex the cop (female, but a very sexy tall, dark, and handsome butch) in a very similar pose, wearing a jock but no shirt and her arms raised up on the sides of a door frame (showing off her muscular arms). And when she was in uniform, gay men used to drool over her.

But I don't expect a bunch of silly queens to understand some lesbians' attraction to butch women -- why would you?

But of course, feel free to pearl-clutch and do your pointless bitchery. After all, isn't that what DL is for?

I don't think she is ugly, but she always looks dead and vacant behind the eyes. No charisma.

Ugly legs too.

If she styled herself femme with better hair in this getup I think it'd be hot. But the mullet and the nonbinary look ain't doing it for me.

She'd not receive the criticism in this thread if she was one, simple thing- good looking.

I just threw up. Thanks OP.

Btw, wasn't there a rumor a while back that another actress was going to announce she was transitioning but hit the pause button when EP beat her to it? It was even money here that the actress in question was KS.

Is she officially Trans now or is this a phase she's going through for attention?

Her soft butch look has worked for her. But people are used to it. Now it seems like she's doubling down on this cover just so people will pay more attention. Granted, it's a cover, so that's probably the point, but still. It's just no interesting or edgy to me. It's Stewart with her trademark head-slightly-cocked, open mouth pose playing trans Halloween.

I still can't forgive her for the 90 minutes stolen from me watching "Seberg".

She never struck me as someone who would transition. But what the fuck do I know. What I suspect really doesn't mean a lot.

R41 Get in line behind the six of us who sat through Personal Shopper.

I love the "Uncensored" as if she's going to say anything remotely salacious, gossipy, offensive, or revealing.

kd lang did it better with the Cindy Crawford photoshoot

Is Kris going trans?

What do we think "the gayest thing ever" is? Should we be scared?

She seems EXHAUSTING!!!

I'm guessing she's not in transition. If she was, her boobs would be less conspicuously shown.

[...]

[...]

Where are the mastectomy scars and tattoos? Poseur.

STUNNING AND BRAVE!

R20, nope. They’re finger wagging that’s not funny tone policing whiny assholes who never ever shut their pie holes.

NBs are just fugly.

Jesus, she looks as skinny and sickly as she did in the Twilight movie when she was pregnant with the hybrid.

Put on some weight, ditch the mullet and stop looking like you're dead.

🎶 I didn’t mean to start a war

Is this feminism once again raising their angry fists at men and subverting gender roles? If only we could just erase all but the first two waves because Z has ruined it and just about everything else they have touched.

In her defense, I gather that none of this was really her idea. Some Gen Z Rollijng Stone editor/writer and/or Kristen's management. Kristen has had a steady presence since she was HUGE via Twilight, but she doesn't strike me as smart/ambitious enough to be pursuing things like this on her own. She strikes me as someone who likes someone else telling her where to be and what to do and collecting a nice pay check for it.

[...]

Ewwww. GROSS

As one woman on Twitter observed, every girl in her school had that hair in 1984.

[quote]She looks like a perverted serial killer.

I too thought she was giving me Aileen Wuornos vibes in that picture. 😂

Even if she were a he with no tits and an actual dick I still would not fuck.

This bitch needs a good smack in the mouth. Goes around moaning about how fucking hard life is, yet had never done a hard day's graft. If being in the public eye is so fucking triggering and draining, pack up your Subaru and drive into the sunset with your millions of dollars and your flannelette shirts. No one is forcing you to be an actor.

She/ it - whatever the fuck K-Stew is - is the most ungrateful, sour looking cunt. I hate her more than the Markle haters hate Meghan.

One thing about Stewart is that she has an exquisitely beautiful face. It's very unfortunate that the expression she usually has on it makes people want to slap her. Not to mention her sullen personality.

But she has a very beautiful face.

The transphobes will be outraged and yet it's obviously just for an attention grabbing cover.

Lady Gaga did the same over 10 years ago and fewer people cared then.

They're always enraged R66.

[...]

Kristen is known for bad hygiene. If you go to her house don't be surprised if you find cigarette butts in the fridge and the shower. Bitch can barely function for a couple of minutes without a cigarette.

[...]

It's fascinating how these non-binary bitches think that to pass for 'male', it's all frowns, furrowed brows, greasy dago.

Whereas for the fags wanting to be female, it's pedo girlhood with bows and ribbons and lipgloss.

These freaks have fucked up ideas on what gender identity is. They go for caricature.

[...]

R71 Kristen has never said she's non-binary? She seems to be still saying she's female while eschewing some of the gender stereotypes. Isn't that what gender critical people want?

The fact you (and others) are still slating a biological woman for dressing non-stereotypically speaks volumes.

Kristen has also never said she's a lesbian, r73, but has instead spouted some crap about sometimes wanting a bacon sandwich and other times wanting a steak.

I'm not sure what r71 is on about, but Kristen has simply been dressed up by Rolling Stone in a trendy "gender fluid" style. Let's hope that's not because she's a lesbian and Rolling Stone thinks that lesbians aren't real women but some kind of gender fluid thing.

Either way, it's an awful photo shoot, by the absolutely garbage Collier Schorr.

I think she's pretty but never bought that she was straight. That whole Twilight cast was gay, gay, gay. Wasn't there some odd hookup with the male director or producer that busted up his marriage though? PE stunt or youthful experimentation?

That pic reminds me of the SATC episode that featured some artist that did photos of women in drag.

PR stunt....

So, Rolling Stone calls Kristen Stewart "gay" (avoiding that scary word lesbian) and shows us just how gay it thinks she is by putting her in a room with a semi-naked man at the edge of the pic. This is what's so bullshit and anti-lesbian about the "gender fluid" crap - it propagates the idea that to be a "queer" woman you must fuck men. Why not put a woman at the edge of the pic? The only answer can be that "queer" ideology is anti-lesbian and anti-homosexual.

Oh, poor Darkminge @ R50, etc...

Nobody made you read this thread or comment on it. I myself have the OP blocked, so I actually looked up the photos on Rolling Stone to see what all the fuss was about. Maybe you should have blocked the OP as well.

[quote]Us REAL homosexual men are not church ladies for not being attracted to a dirty fucking bisexual butch female

I don't expect you to be [bold]attracted[/bold] to a butch female. And those pics weren't taken for you. I mean, I'm repulsed by the penis, but I scroll on by them, because I know I'm on DL and that goes with the territory. And perhaps you didn't know this, but DL used to have a lesbian section back when I first came here in 2004. Since that section went the way of the almiqui overlords, we are loose amongst you. Suck it up, buttercup.

And it is true that gay men lusted after my ex, [italic]because they didn't know she was a female[/italic] when they first saw her in her police uniform. They were always disappointed later, but they liked her anyway as a person. As a couple, we had many gay male friends.

So now I have tried to reason with you. But know this: you are completely off the chain. Perhaps you should get your meds checked if seeing something this irrelevant to you as a person upsets you so much.

She looks like she needs a good wash.

Xtina covered this dirrrty territory 20 years ago.

Thank you for your thoughtful posts Senior Lesbian.

I just wanted to add that as an actual old church lady I can’t get over the fragile prisspottery of some of the posts on this thread. Some people here are really, really uptight.

R78 - you’re dealing with a sock puppet that likes to troll. Don’t fall for the bait.

To the lesbians posting here who seem to be under the impression that this is some kind of lesbian aesthetic for a female gaze, what do you think of fact there is a man in this picture along with Kristen? For me, as a lesbian, it says "see guys, dykes really do want dick".

R2, there are no normal lesbians.

100% ^^^^

Absolutely, R83. And the fact the male figure is a bulked up man, leaving no ambiguity as to the gender.

Unless, it's a FTM model, but that's not the narrative Rolling Stone is running with.

It’s Rolling Stone not Mother Jones. The aesthetic is drugs and people who might smell bad, but probably have more sex than you, not deep thoughts.

Oh, that makes it all ok then, r87. Must be why Rolling Stone calls Stewart "gay" and then the first photo it posts immediately under that headline is "butch" Kristen and a semi-naked man. All by "gender queer" Collier Schorr.

Rolling Stone is trying to make a big deal out of the fact that this nonsense is being criticised by the "right" (i.e. a couple of people on Twitter) in order to try to turn this into a "cultural moment", but all I see is a picture telling us that dykes like to suck dick too.

Of course, in your mind dykes who suck dick have more sex than I as a lesbian with a female partner do because sex isn't real sex unless it involves a penis.

R77 I think Rolling Stone is saying their critics are calling her gay, rather than calling her that themselves.

To be honest, they should have put "gay" in speech marks, but it's pretty clear they're saying the right wing criticism is coming from narrow minded idiots who think Rolling Stone is trying to promote being gay via that cover.

I meant to add as well that magazines have been doing 'arty' covers like this for ages with celebrities deliberately dressing in a non stereotypical manner in order to produce an aesthetically striking front cover.

We just accepted until the last few years now it kicks off a massive argument about gender identity, trans, misogyny, homophobia, etc. I'm pretty sure when Lady Gaga dressed up as 'Joey Fattone' people just said it was attention seeking and left it as that, but now it has to turn into a huge debate.

R18 Yeah, no trashy rappers or punk rockers or greasy dykes on the cover of Rolling Stone magazine!

R90?

Especially here on DL. [sigh]

Incel division trolls have to do something on their bathroom breaks and I guess they found DL.

Kristen Stewart moving quickly toward obscurity.

This sounds ominous.

[quote]“If I could grow a little mustache, if I could grow a fucking happy trail and unbutton my pants, I would.”

Is no one going to point out how tired, derivative, and weak the fashion and styling on this is?

She looks like Kamala's stepdaughter.

Now that would be a proper DL response R96.

Why are people on this thread arguing over this lame, tired-ass cover image?

It looks like Aileen Wuornos came back from the dead for one last kill. Her mouth area reminds me of the bucktoothed witch from Hocus Pocus.

The Tragedy of the Empty Jockstrap

How dare she steal my groove.

The vulgarity never stops, does it?

To whomever is arguing with Mingelord, just stop. It's a troll account and cosplays. I believe it was outed as being the Sao Paolo mental patient too. Block it.

[...]

[...]

It's by "queer" Collier Schorr, r96, so of course it's juvenile rubbish. That's another sign that Rolling Stone's only approach to lesbians is to marginalise us: instead of pairing Kristen up with a decent photographer, they dumped the useless Collier Schorr on her.

Shocked by these responses outside of senior lez and elder lez.

Why are you so offended by this? Who cares? She’s a lesbian actress and she did a very butch photo shoot for some dumb magazine that barely anyone reads anymore. Of all the things to give a shit about - THIS is what sends you over the edge?

The hysteria and rage on this thread is mind-blowing. Even for DL.

This isn't appealing to men or women

I'm no fan of Stewart, but at least she's perfectly comfortable being a woman, and a woman-loving woman at that. She will likely never transition (either "socially" or surgically). The same goes for Kate Moennig.

R108 is another one who thinks a "lesbian actress" in "a very butch photo shoot" alongside a semi-naked man represents a "lesbian aesthetic".

That's right, r110, and even in an interview where she's trying to use the word "gay" (she's aware that saying "lesbian" is considered taking it too far these days) they're trying to de-lesbianise her.

I'm not a trans hater but this is vomit inducing. Ugh.

"and even in an interview where she's trying to use the word "gay" (she's aware that saying "lesbian" is considered taking it too far these days) they're trying to de-lesbianise her."

Every single word of this is truth. Pretty sure Ellen Degeneres never shirked from using the word 'lesbian' to describe herself.

Give it a few years and Stewart, Cara Delevigne and their ilk will have foregone the whole 'gay' identities and will have settled down with douche bros. Gay baiting is like so......2020.

She looks like a dirty methhead.

She looks like an idiot.

What’s creepy is women have this really perverted concept of masculinity the same way men do.

These queer / non-binary chicks all see men as dirty men and fetishize it like in this shoot.

It’s just as gross and tacky as male crossdressers. I guess the idea of cross dressing is based in the worst sexual stereotypes of the sexes.

It’s fascinating.

True, r116, although I'd blame Collier Schorr rather than Kristen for that.