Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Im watching Play Misty for Me

This film does not seem like it came out in 1971. Masterpiece.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 14August 18, 2025 10:39 PM

It captured Carmel/Monterey/Big Sur really well. To me it has almost a European auteur feel - Clint's first movie he directed, but he had really close mentorship from Don Siegel. Fun fact: Clint auditioned Sondra Locke (fresh from her Heart as a Lonely Hunter Oscar nomination) for the Jessica Walter part... and passed on her.

by Anonymousreply 1February 2, 2024 2:10 AM

Well, it was filmed in 1970, so that’s why it looks the way it does. There was a sea change between those two years.

by Anonymousreply 2February 2, 2024 2:14 AM

R2 No I’m saying the vibe, atmosphere, ethos, soundtrack, POV all seem mid 80s. This was a very forward thinking film; all movies made before 1985 but after 1959 visually appear the same to a young cunt like me.

by Anonymousreply 3February 2, 2024 2:25 AM

Whenever I see Clint Eastwood, I think of Pauline Kael, who despised him without apology. But I love Jessica Walter in this movie. A truly stellar on-point depiction of Fucking Nuts! (And so beautiful !) Also the nostalgia factor is huge with this movie.

by Anonymousreply 4February 2, 2024 2:34 AM

R3 Wow.... from black and white French New Wave to Spaghetti Westerns to American Auteur to Indie to Blaxploitation etc etc.... the period you list has so much more variety than now.

by Anonymousreply 5February 2, 2024 2:34 AM

R4 Kael wanted to fuck him. He ignored her. She never forgave him.

by Anonymousreply 6February 2, 2024 2:35 AM

R5 Visually cunt I said visually. Critically reading.

#Graphics

by Anonymousreply 7February 2, 2024 2:38 AM

Visually there was infinite variety in those years... Dr Zhivago and The Servant? But it appears you just want to argue.

by Anonymousreply 8February 2, 2024 2:47 AM

It hasn’t a clue if he thinks the “visual” look of that movie is mid-80s and not early 70s… not even worth responding to such nonsense, except in terms they can understand 🤡

by Anonymousreply 9February 2, 2024 2:59 AM

Jessica Walter walked so Glenn Close could run.

by Anonymousreply 10February 2, 2024 3:26 AM

R10 = DL post of the month.

by Anonymousreply 11February 2, 2024 3:28 AM

R10 😂 Love you.

by Anonymousreply 12February 2, 2024 3:29 AM

It was originally developed as a sit com pilot. When the network passed, Eastwood bought back the negative, killed the laughs, and added what’s basically the second half of the film.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 13February 2, 2024 4:05 AM

Jessica Walter eye roll.

by Anonymousreply 14August 18, 2025 10:39 PM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!