Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Meghan Markle For Senate!

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 42October 3, 2023 12:33 PM

She should do it — oh the ecstasy in the UK! Something to talk about for six years to distract attention from the rolling disaster that is brexit.

by Anonymousreply 1October 1, 2023 2:19 PM

Is this like when she was being "considered" to be the Dior ambassador?

by Anonymousreply 2October 1, 2023 2:22 PM

I don't even like her, but this is such clear nonsense rumour. Also, her name being "bandied about" doesn't mean she herself is considering running for Senate. Lots of names are bandied about here on DL for all sorts of silly reasons.

by Anonymousreply 3October 1, 2023 2:22 PM

Well.............. she IS a black woman and Newsom promised that he would appoint a black woman. But..........

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 4October 1, 2023 2:23 PM

Isn't she that slut from Suits?

by Anonymousreply 5October 1, 2023 2:26 PM

r5 That's exactly what Prince Philip said when Harry first introduced her

by Anonymousreply 6October 1, 2023 2:28 PM

She’s overqualified for the job. Yes, Meghan fucking Markle is more qualified than 99% of those scumbags.

by Anonymousreply 7October 1, 2023 2:32 PM

She should do it

by Anonymousreply 8October 1, 2023 2:36 PM

go meg!

by Anonymousreply 9October 1, 2023 2:41 PM

California deserves her.

by Anonymousreply 10October 1, 2023 2:43 PM

The greatest social climber since Cinderella.

by Anonymousreply 11October 1, 2023 2:44 PM

OP, you are a stupid, fucking cunt. A total loser. Stop posting this shit

by Anonymousreply 12October 1, 2023 2:47 PM

Harry: “will you be away ALOT?”

by Anonymousreply 13October 1, 2023 2:51 PM

Better her than ancient Barbara Lee.

by Anonymousreply 14October 1, 2023 5:01 PM

[quote]Isn't she that slut from Suits?

She’s the most ambitious briefcase opener from a dumb game show that is basically “Guess Which Number I am Thinking Of” in the history of the world.

I don’t hate her and think stories like this aren’t started by her, but man she’s gotten a lot of attention for someone who started off as a briefcase girl from the world’s dumbest and most boring game show.

I guess if an evil fascist former game show host can become president, a briefcase girl can be a senator.

by Anonymousreply 15October 1, 2023 5:11 PM

Manifesting thy name is Meghan. She’s at it again.

And with predictable results: one more embarrassing failure.

by Anonymousreply 16October 1, 2023 5:12 PM

Please please please let this be true. What fun her campaign will be. They’ve been far too quiet for far too long.

by Anonymousreply 17October 1, 2023 5:18 PM

It is surprising because it’s completely untrue.

Slow news over at the Daily Fail.

“Will Meagan Markle replace Joe Biden on Dem ticket? Some people think her name might be bandied about!”

“Are Harry & Meagan considering their own ticket in run for White House? Some people are saying it’s possible to think so!”

“Is Meagan thinking of restarting Twitter under her brand? Nobody can say for sure, but many, many people are pondering the thought.”

by Anonymousreply 18October 1, 2023 5:25 PM

British tabloids are OBSESSED with her. I get the concept of loving to hate someone, but they take the most banal bits of non-news to spin themselves and their audience into such a lather.

by Anonymousreply 19October 1, 2023 5:39 PM

Well, she would fit right in with all the other sociopaths in congress.

by Anonymousreply 20October 1, 2023 5:52 PM

[quote]I don't even like her, but this is such clear nonsense rumour.

Agreed. If she were going into politics, she wouldn't be popped into a Senate seat right away with no qualifications.

by Anonymousreply 21October 1, 2023 6:01 PM

Megan Markle to host Rose Bowl Parade? It could be possible!

by Anonymousreply 22October 1, 2023 6:14 PM

Regarding Markle, no one would support an inexperienced, unqualified, D-list, lying fucking grifter for the Senate.

by Anonymousreply 23October 1, 2023 7:18 PM

This makes as much sense as Twitler for POTUS….oh wait….err

by Anonymousreply 24October 1, 2023 7:21 PM

r19 - I'd correct that to say "the British media are obsessed with the revenue Markle click-bait brings in." It never fails to attract.

by Anonymousreply 25October 1, 2023 9:48 PM

Get her off of my screen! There I said it!

by Anonymousreply 26October 1, 2023 10:04 PM

She, and other thirsty cunts, pay for Daily Mail "stories" to stay visible. Werkly reports for two years on Jenny Garner taking her children to church were not exactly organic news, for instance.

by Anonymousreply 27October 1, 2023 10:27 PM

Why is her lipstick smeared like that, or does she possess a cleft lip?

by Anonymousreply 28October 1, 2023 11:02 PM

She should run. She would probably be more effective that Feinstein was during her last 10 years

by Anonymousreply 29October 1, 2023 11:07 PM

R29, she can only spend an hour a week on Archewell. There's no way she'd actually do anything, much less achieve something important.

by Anonymousreply 30October 1, 2023 11:29 PM

She could give Sinema a run for her money for the title of “Most Vapid Cuntress in Congress.”

by Anonymousreply 31October 2, 2023 12:03 AM

R10, your red state trailer park deserves Marjorie Taylor Greene

by Anonymousreply 32October 2, 2023 12:07 AM

R23 probably voted for unqualified grifter Tommy Tuberville

by Anonymousreply 33October 2, 2023 12:08 AM

Obviously this story was invented by the far right to scare old conservative folks into voting for their candidates.

by Anonymousreply 34October 2, 2023 12:09 AM

R34 is correct

by Anonymousreply 35October 2, 2023 12:10 AM

I think Markle's time in the sun is ending. Stories about her in the DM don't get as many responses as they did a few years ago. This story is very silly.

by Anonymousreply 36October 2, 2023 12:11 AM

The inexperienced, supremely unqualified, D-list, lying fucking grifter Markle has a snowball's chance in hell of coming anywhere near the Senate or any political office for that matter. She would actually have to work.

by Anonymousreply 37October 2, 2023 6:12 AM

[quote]Deport this skank!

Isn't she American?

by Anonymousreply 38October 2, 2023 6:30 AM

Just one more MM trial balloon goes down in flames.

A black woman, Laphonza Butler, President of Emily’s List, has been appointed to DiFi’s seat as junior senator from California by Gov Gavin Newsome.

Not to Duchess of (once again) Excess.

by Anonymousreply 39October 2, 2023 12:01 PM

Bulter is a lesbian too!

by Anonymousreply 40October 2, 2023 1:46 PM

Isn't there a law against foreign royalty holding political office?

Woudn't the emoluments clause prohibit this?

[quote]Constitution prohibits any person holding a government office from accepting any present, emolument, office, or title from any "King, Prince, or foreign State...

by Anonymousreply 41October 2, 2023 2:06 PM

There is nothing more right wing than Royalty

by Anonymousreply 42October 3, 2023 12:33 PM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!