[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]
She should do it — oh the ecstasy in the UK! Something to talk about for six years to distract attention from the rolling disaster that is brexit.
by Anonymous | reply 1 | October 1, 2023 2:19 PM |
Is this like when she was being "considered" to be the Dior ambassador?
by Anonymous | reply 2 | October 1, 2023 2:22 PM |
I don't even like her, but this is such clear nonsense rumour. Also, her name being "bandied about" doesn't mean she herself is considering running for Senate. Lots of names are bandied about here on DL for all sorts of silly reasons.
by Anonymous | reply 3 | October 1, 2023 2:22 PM |
Well.............. she IS a black woman and Newsom promised that he would appoint a black woman. But..........
by Anonymous | reply 4 | October 1, 2023 2:23 PM |
Isn't she that slut from Suits?
by Anonymous | reply 5 | October 1, 2023 2:26 PM |
r5 That's exactly what Prince Philip said when Harry first introduced her
by Anonymous | reply 6 | October 1, 2023 2:28 PM |
She’s overqualified for the job. Yes, Meghan fucking Markle is more qualified than 99% of those scumbags.
by Anonymous | reply 7 | October 1, 2023 2:32 PM |
She should do it
by Anonymous | reply 8 | October 1, 2023 2:36 PM |
go meg!
by Anonymous | reply 9 | October 1, 2023 2:41 PM |
California deserves her.
by Anonymous | reply 10 | October 1, 2023 2:43 PM |
The greatest social climber since Cinderella.
by Anonymous | reply 11 | October 1, 2023 2:44 PM |
OP, you are a stupid, fucking cunt. A total loser. Stop posting this shit
by Anonymous | reply 12 | October 1, 2023 2:47 PM |
Harry: “will you be away ALOT?”
by Anonymous | reply 13 | October 1, 2023 2:51 PM |
Better her than ancient Barbara Lee.
by Anonymous | reply 14 | October 1, 2023 5:01 PM |
[quote]Isn't she that slut from Suits?
She’s the most ambitious briefcase opener from a dumb game show that is basically “Guess Which Number I am Thinking Of” in the history of the world.
I don’t hate her and think stories like this aren’t started by her, but man she’s gotten a lot of attention for someone who started off as a briefcase girl from the world’s dumbest and most boring game show.
I guess if an evil fascist former game show host can become president, a briefcase girl can be a senator.
by Anonymous | reply 15 | October 1, 2023 5:11 PM |
Manifesting thy name is Meghan. She’s at it again.
And with predictable results: one more embarrassing failure.
by Anonymous | reply 16 | October 1, 2023 5:12 PM |
Please please please let this be true. What fun her campaign will be. They’ve been far too quiet for far too long.
by Anonymous | reply 17 | October 1, 2023 5:18 PM |
It is surprising because it’s completely untrue.
Slow news over at the Daily Fail.
“Will Meagan Markle replace Joe Biden on Dem ticket? Some people think her name might be bandied about!”
“Are Harry & Meagan considering their own ticket in run for White House? Some people are saying it’s possible to think so!”
“Is Meagan thinking of restarting Twitter under her brand? Nobody can say for sure, but many, many people are pondering the thought.”
by Anonymous | reply 18 | October 1, 2023 5:25 PM |
British tabloids are OBSESSED with her. I get the concept of loving to hate someone, but they take the most banal bits of non-news to spin themselves and their audience into such a lather.
by Anonymous | reply 19 | October 1, 2023 5:39 PM |
Well, she would fit right in with all the other sociopaths in congress.
by Anonymous | reply 20 | October 1, 2023 5:52 PM |
[quote]I don't even like her, but this is such clear nonsense rumour.
Agreed. If she were going into politics, she wouldn't be popped into a Senate seat right away with no qualifications.
by Anonymous | reply 21 | October 1, 2023 6:01 PM |
Megan Markle to host Rose Bowl Parade? It could be possible!
by Anonymous | reply 22 | October 1, 2023 6:14 PM |
Regarding Markle, no one would support an inexperienced, unqualified, D-list, lying fucking grifter for the Senate.
by Anonymous | reply 23 | October 1, 2023 7:18 PM |
This makes as much sense as Twitler for POTUS….oh wait….err
by Anonymous | reply 24 | October 1, 2023 7:21 PM |
r19 - I'd correct that to say "the British media are obsessed with the revenue Markle click-bait brings in." It never fails to attract.
by Anonymous | reply 25 | October 1, 2023 9:48 PM |
Get her off of my screen! There I said it!
by Anonymous | reply 26 | October 1, 2023 10:04 PM |
She, and other thirsty cunts, pay for Daily Mail "stories" to stay visible. Werkly reports for two years on Jenny Garner taking her children to church were not exactly organic news, for instance.
by Anonymous | reply 27 | October 1, 2023 10:27 PM |
Why is her lipstick smeared like that, or does she possess a cleft lip?
by Anonymous | reply 28 | October 1, 2023 11:02 PM |
She should run. She would probably be more effective that Feinstein was during her last 10 years
by Anonymous | reply 29 | October 1, 2023 11:07 PM |
R29, she can only spend an hour a week on Archewell. There's no way she'd actually do anything, much less achieve something important.
by Anonymous | reply 30 | October 1, 2023 11:29 PM |
She could give Sinema a run for her money for the title of “Most Vapid Cuntress in Congress.”
by Anonymous | reply 31 | October 2, 2023 12:03 AM |
R10, your red state trailer park deserves Marjorie Taylor Greene
by Anonymous | reply 32 | October 2, 2023 12:07 AM |
R23 probably voted for unqualified grifter Tommy Tuberville
by Anonymous | reply 33 | October 2, 2023 12:08 AM |
Obviously this story was invented by the far right to scare old conservative folks into voting for their candidates.
by Anonymous | reply 34 | October 2, 2023 12:09 AM |
R34 is correct
by Anonymous | reply 35 | October 2, 2023 12:10 AM |
I think Markle's time in the sun is ending. Stories about her in the DM don't get as many responses as they did a few years ago. This story is very silly.
by Anonymous | reply 36 | October 2, 2023 12:11 AM |
The inexperienced, supremely unqualified, D-list, lying fucking grifter Markle has a snowball's chance in hell of coming anywhere near the Senate or any political office for that matter. She would actually have to work.
by Anonymous | reply 37 | October 2, 2023 6:12 AM |
[quote]Deport this skank!
Isn't she American?
by Anonymous | reply 38 | October 2, 2023 6:30 AM |
Just one more MM trial balloon goes down in flames.
A black woman, Laphonza Butler, President of Emily’s List, has been appointed to DiFi’s seat as junior senator from California by Gov Gavin Newsome.
Not to Duchess of (once again) Excess.
by Anonymous | reply 39 | October 2, 2023 12:01 PM |
Bulter is a lesbian too!
by Anonymous | reply 40 | October 2, 2023 1:46 PM |
Isn't there a law against foreign royalty holding political office?
Woudn't the emoluments clause prohibit this?
[quote]Constitution prohibits any person holding a government office from accepting any present, emolument, office, or title from any "King, Prince, or foreign State...
by Anonymous | reply 41 | October 2, 2023 2:06 PM |
There is nothing more right wing than Royalty
by Anonymous | reply 42 | October 3, 2023 12:33 PM |