Spirit Airlines passenger: is she wearing leggings or not

Even if she is.....that is gross.

I'm not allowed to vote in polls for some reason. I vote NO.

If you watch the video closely you can see the leggings. They come down to the back of her knees and are close to the color of her skin. It's a terrible look - but she is wearing leggings.

Leggings vs. bare ass. One of the great debates of our time!

I have a terrible feeling this just another great big fat person so I decline a visit to Zuck's tracking site to see it.

Forgot to post the pic. You can clearly see the leggings at this point in the video. She looks terrible but she IS wearing leggings.

YouTube version:

Tight shorts?

Did you read any of the posts in the thread R8?

Where is the fabric, R8? Have you never seen a bare ass? Look at the image. Where are the shorts, precious?

Watch the video R10.

Looks like she's wearing flesh-colored control top pantyhose. Are those runs/tears at the back of her knees?

Girl, what were you [not] thinking while getting dressed that morning? Dayam!

A view from the front would’ve cleared this all up! Shame on the videographer.

If she is wearing leggings, how are they all stuck up in her ass like that? Cloth, even a stretchy fabric, would go across the ass cleft, not in it. I was wondering if maybe she was wearing a G-string with the string buried deep in the ass, but the hoo-ha in front covered.

If you have not been to the original thread, please do so now. Be an informed voter.

I love DL.

Agreed, R14, perhaps she was wearing thong swimsuit, with a cover up over top, and the thong got wedged deep, deep inside the crack. Only possible option besides that she was literally stark naked in an airport.

I still think she was stark nekkid in a Florida airport.

She has lighter colored skin on the back of her knees and the soles of her feet. There are no leggings, tights or pants. Anyone who says there are is either joking or needs better glasses.

She is absolutely not wearing leggings, and she is absolutely a pig.

Are the posters claiming she's wearing legging simply contrarians?

They are the same posters who say the looters cannot be assumed to be POC, that the lootings are a harmless letting off of youthful steam, that its justifiable frustration with systemic intergenerational racism, and that there can be zero consequences.

The eyewitness POC woman giving the testimony on the video, knows what she is looking at. NO DRAWERS!

I am a fat chick. if she were wearing ANYTHING (leggings, tights, spanx) tight enough to go up her but crack like that it would be 100 percent obvious because wherever whatever ended would cut into her flesh drastically and like roll up a bit around the edges leaving a thick dark obvious line.

I am starting to suspect none of you have ever worn spanx or short leggings.

Maybe you can dox her and drive her to suicide, fatty

She's wearing leggings. You can see them at the back of her knees.

She is dressed inappropriately for anything outside of her house but she is clothed.

What makes more sense? This woman is wearing flesh-colored leggings that are difficult to discern, or this woman made it to the security line in an American airport without clothes on her lower half?

A lost thong, maybe. Pantyhose or leggings, no.

r24, she's clearly impervious to shame.

It seems trendy right now for young ladies to wear leotard-like clothing that matches their skin-tone.

[quote]I am starting to suspect none of you have ever worn spanx or short leggings.

Or been fat.

No tights, pants or shorts of any kind on that sow. She's donald ducking in that airport. The dark line on the back of her legs is just general darkening/staining that fat black people get.

The more I look at the video, the more convinced I am she is wearing leggings. The line of demarcation is too stark and is the same on both legs.

Survey Says: NO LEGGINGS

She is definitely wearing leggings that end just about the middle of where her calf meets her thigh on the back side of her knee.

Interesting that those who are CERTAIN she's wearing leggings all seem to see the length differently. Below the ankle? Mid-calf? Above the knee?

The bitch is BUCK NAKED. The reason no one is confronting her is because she's presumed insane and ain't no one got time to deal with that while they're trying to make their 79.99 Spirit flight to Fort Lauderdale. Add to that her race, and no one wants to provoke A Incident.

Yeah, R35; airport security ALWAYS allows people to walk/stand around the terminal naked from the waist down . . . 🙄

R35 This. Everyone has a different view of where he leggings stop.

Also R35 Thank you for using the correct BUCK naked rather than butt naked no matter easy it would be to just give in.

I bet her aisle companions enjoyed her fragrance.

Honestly, I could go either way R26.

R36, this is Spirit Airlines we're talking about.

Only trashy people use the expression "throwing hands," dear.

It's funny how people think the wrinkle on the back of her fat legs means she's wearing leggings.

Sista is Winnie the Pooh-ing it!

R36, she is probably wearing some kind of skimpy underwear that barely covers her naughty bits in front and has creeped up on her butt. There are no leggings. As someone said upthread, the people who insist there are leggings can't even agree where they end.

People like this used to be arrested...

People who walk into an airport with no drawers on are still arrested, r46. That's how we know that this woman has leggings on.

There are fraus in that crowd and fucking Karens galore. No way does the fat chick get more than a few feet into that building without any pants on. No way, no how. The Karens/fraus would shut her down right quick. They live for that kind of opportunity.

Like I said, R47, she could be wearing skimpy underwear. She doesn't have to be wearing leggings. Her outfit might be more pulled down in front and maybe doesn't look as trashy as the back.

She could pull that orange stretch thing down to barely cover her ass. That's all she would need to do if some authority challenged her.

I read some of the comments on Instagram. You have a few nuts there that say people around her should have tried to help her. Also, some claim that no one would care if it were a skinny woman. They say people only mocking because her ass be so big.

I'm loving the Miss Cleo narration.

R47 There are no leggings. doofus.

R50 Write like an adult.

Fat sloppy, drippy pussy on that airplane seat. Can we not have a dress code? Again, I am more than willing to pay more money not to fly with shit like that on my flight. I cant afford to fly private but if I could, I would. People are nasty.

All you queens going on about security make me laugh. This isn't Ben Gurion. It's the Spirit counter at Fort Fucking Lauderdale.

Security probably doesn't even respond to calls there.

Leggings or no leggings her ass crack is clearly visible and her butt should be covered. Selena Gomez can carry off that look but this bitch cannot.

R55 I love you for this.

This idea that security or some Karen is going to block this bigass woman at the door is hilarious. Nobody cares. What the fuck are they supposed to do about it anyway, they have a plane to catch.

She’s got a plane to cooch.

R55 and R57. Are you F’ing kidding us?!? Security personnel LIVE to go after, harass, and assault Black women, especially for “crimes” less graphic than this.

The footage is less than a minute long. Who knows how long she actually looked like that before someone told her to pull down the back. Not long, I would guess.

r59 You've not been to an airport in a while.

R59 just hopes this is what's happening.

R62 Hey, hey, hey

I wouldn't be too dismissive of the security angle. I'm pretty sure they have dogs that are specially trained to sniff out crack.

I believe she is wearing assless leggings.

From LL Bean’s “Keep ‘Em Guessing” line.

She needs a pashmina.

Very good, R64.

And all this time I thought that black don’t crack.

r67 You tried

I was just waiting for Greg to show up.

Thank you, R68.

I don’t mind trying and failing.

The woman appears to be docile and unlikely to disrupt the flight. This is preferable over the women who fight in airports or onboard an aircraft. If we have to choose between a woman causing a major disturbance and one with no drawers, I have to go with the latter.

Well, the thread was fun while it lasted.

[quote] I was just waiting for Greg to show up.

Waiting in joyful hope?

[quote] Well, the thread was fun while it lasted.

Okay, I’ll leave, R72.

[quote] A view from the front would’ve cleared this all up! Shame on the videographer.

He tried, but when he saw her volvo he dropped his camera in shock and had to flee

The Daily News had it on their website with the ass crack pixelated.

Crack ho

Remember when we used to argue about the color of that dress? Good times, no butt crack.

I saw her brother in the parking lot.

Someone should take a pic of her from the back, with her ass in all its glory, and show it to her and say "Honey, do you know you look like this?"

When do we get the apologetic video a la "Man isn't real" woman wherein Assless Leggings(?) Lady said "everyone has bad days" and hers just ended up being filmed and shown all over the internet, that she's very sorry and she'll be sure next time to wear a top long enough to cover her ass crack.

8 out of 10 DLers agree: NO LEGGINGS

I can’t believe 20% of the people on this board believe in the leggings fairy

Those are awesome legging, R83. They make you look exactly the way you would if you were naked. Magical.

She's a regular fashion plate!