The impeachment inquiry into Joe Biden was already a disappointment before it started on Thursday. In prepared testimony, two of the three witnesses called by Republicans explicitly said there was not enough evidence to warrant removing President Joe Biden from office. This included Jonathan Turley, the law professor and Fox News contributor, who said, “I do not believe that the evidence currently meets the standard of a high crime and misdemeanor needed for an article of impeachment.”
Republican Lauren Boebert asked Turley “where does selling access to an executive office fall in terms of what justifies an impeachment inquiry and what is deemed an impeachable offense” and got an extended legal discussion, which included multiple references to the U.S. code. “I shouldn’t have asked Turley a question,” she told a staffer, disappointed, as she got up to leave the hearing room. “He was a crappy witness.”
The hearing, which was an effort to lay out the Republican case for connecting Biden with his son Hunter’s sleazy overseas business dealings, started with some promise. The hearing room was full, overflowing with reporters and the full array of perennial hearing attendees. The left wing Congressional Integrity Project sent observers—-one in a mask—-wearing t-shirts emblazoned with the face of committee chair James Comer with the slogan “no evidence” written above his face. Only a few chairs down sat the mother of Ashli Babbitt, the insurrectionist shot dead by Capitol Police on January 6 while trying to break into the House chamber, and conservative media personality Tom Fitton.
Other low-lights included one member referring to a “shitter” in a hearing while another repeatedly used the word “bullshit” in a hearing was unusual. This was likely the first time in the nearly 250-year history of the United States that a member of Congress made a point of order to ask the chair to instruct another member “not to introduce pornography today,” as well.
[...]
[bold] Few Republicans were in the hearing room most of the time. Instead, they wandered in and out, bringing coffee and energy drinks to stay alert as the hours ticked by. The Democratic seats were mostly occupied for the first half of the hearings as Raskin seemed to have a grin constantly appearing on his face throughout the proceedings. In contrast, Comer sat mostly grim-faced [/bold] and spent time peering at his iPhone when not expressing exasperation that Democrat Dan Goldman repeatedly asked for unanimous consent for the same deposition from one of Hunter Biden’s business partners be introduced into evidence again and again and again. By the end of the hearing a visibly peeved Comer agreed yet again in a near empty room “for the seventh time without objection” as Goldman continued to use the deposition to play defense for Biden.
Perhaps the quintessential moment for what the hearing became was when Democrat Jared Moskowitz used his five minutes to deliver a borscht belt style comedy monologue that repeatedly provoked guffaws of laughter from the Democratic side of the hearing room and, at one point, forced Alexandria Ocasio Cortez to cover her mouth because of how much she laughing. Moskowitz began his remarks by saying of the hearing “as a former director of emergency management, I know a disaster when I see one” and proceeded with an array of props and charts.