The Sound of Freedom douche, Tim Ballard, is ACCUSED!

Dafuq

He looks like a shitty version of Jason Bateman.

He looks like drunk or a meth head.

I’m noticing a pattern…

Of course

What does Jim "Jesus" Caviezel have to say about this?

Is that a pattern called “projection”, R4?

Hot white daddy.

R8: demented asshole.

R2 *shittier

He looks like he could be related to Kirk Cameron.

Let’s be honest, he’s hot as fuck.

R11 I wonder who took Kirk's cherry roughly and drove him to become a rightie asshole.

R9 I’m supposed to jump on bandwagon of accusations when this man accomplished something noble and rescued people? I don’t know if he is guilty yet and neither do you. Also even if true it does not negate the work he did in ending sex trafficking and it’s not even on the same level of sin. I notice that anytime Christians have a huge commercial success in Hollywood, which I also love, comes out with scandal. Yet they cover up cunts like Harvey Weinstein for decades. I hate hypocrisy.

r12 God no, not in the least - gives off an inbred vibe.

Calm your tits, R14. There is no evidence that sleazeball actually did any of those things that Freedumb movie claimed.

American Christians are little more than fascists these days. They are certainly no followers of Jesus Christ.

R9 He hasn’t ended sex trafficking. Will his next movie be about the straight, white, male Christians right here in the USA who have been caught almost weekly abusing children? Those pedos are almost always involved in a church and are conservative Republicans. But Tim and his star, QAnon loon Jim, suggest the child trafficking, grooming and abuse is coming from the left.

It’s an insidious and dangerous ideology that does not make room for gay apologists like you (if you are indeed gay). These are the same right-wing grifters who believe Anderson Cooper eats babies. Jim Caviezel is a wild-eyed nut who thinks people on the left drink the blood of children. They are cons. If they weren’t, you’d see them go after the real child abusers within their own communities. They haven’t ended shit.

^ And Caviezel thinks Trump is the new Moses. Really.

I’d enjoy letting this AWG with hot DILF vibes try to penetrate me with his mere 3 inches. But I don’t think he would enjoy “reciprocation hour”!

Well, now we know where the loon who posted the "This is what a 60 year old bottom's pink hole looks like" thread got the picture.

Too bad there isn't one or two guys among those accusing him. I would have enjoyed the MAGA/christ-fascists' screaming and heads exploding.

My rant at R17 was meant for R14

R14 sounds like de-fat-turd, getting hot over ultra-right crazies who’d rather see his gay, fat gunt hanging from a tree.

Comments from Jim Caviezel?

Groping the breasts of underage trafficking victims

It’s always projection with these guys. Someone check Jim Caviezal’s hard drives.

[quote]Sound of Freedom douche

Is this feminine hygiene product available through Amazon Prime?

Everything men do is for hole.

“Bah bah I’m a straight white man and I can grab pussy whenever I want!”

From the AOL link:

[quote] “Ballard would get ketamine treatments and have a scribe come in with him while he would talk to the dead prophet Nephi and issue forth prophecies about Ballard’s greatness and future as a United States senator, president of the United States and ultimately the Mormon prophet to usher in the second coming of Christ," the lawsuit states.

Angel Studios, you left the good part out of your Sound of Freedom movie! It's a shame, because Jim Caviezel knows how to play deluded and crazy better than almost anyone.

No mention of what he is even being accused of. I am noticing a pattern as well. It's all a tad sus as the kids say nowadays.

If nothing becomes of this then we know who the real "fascists" are.

Honest question....what is it with the progresive hate for this film daring to address child p*rn/trafficking ? I saw the movie and allthough I thought it was somewhat overrated I saw nothing that was conspiracy theorist or blamed politicians or any of that Q anon shit. Neither did the people I watched it with.

The progresive media has to realize they're not exactly doing a bang up job image wise by bitching about this sort of stuff.

And if nothing comes out of this, yeah, they'll continue to bury themsrlves in shit.

R14. The same level of sin? Are you posting from the 14th century? If it were just sin he was accused of, I would applaud him. Sin is is offending god, which is an admirable thing. He’s accused of hurting people, not god.

He didn’t end sex trafficking.

Well there must be SOMETHING to the stories R14, because so far the Mormon Church has EXCOMMUNICATED HIM over this shit, and put out direct statements against him. He's looking at Lawsuits for "trafficking" himself by 5 different women, with more coming on board soon. His LLC's and partners are under investigation too. He's about as hot-white Radioactive as can be right now.

That asshole comic Heather McDonalds was pushing this shitty movie! Hahahaah

[quote]what is it with the progresive hate for this film daring to address child p*rn/trafficking ?

Oh, I dunno, maybe it's the predictable storyline with Hispanics as the villains? The reliance on old tropes? Maybe it's the wooden performances and odd interjections of some conspiracy theory-esque dialogue?

The National Center for Missing and Exploited Children receive more than 50,000 reports per year, and have the budget to investigate a mere fraction. Maybe the money that was put into this film, based on the life of a guy who purports to be a child exploitation expert and activist but is in reality an exploiter of children and women, would have been better spent doing something for these exploited children. But then Jim Cavaziel would have been yet again unemployed, so there is that.

Hispanics as the villains? As an actual hispanic are they NOT protraying a true story? Plus the movie hinted plenty of times at white americans being the biggest clients. I found the film a tad melodramatic but I didnt find the acting wooden and whatever conspiracy theory dialogue went over the heads of everyone I know that saw it.

"but is in reality an exploiter of children and women"

Yet to be proven.

"would have been better spent doing something for these exploited children."

they did plenty.

Weird hill to die on and again, really not a good look.

R37, defending a predator like Tim Ballard is a weird hill to die on. Defending QAnon propaganda starring Jim Caviezel is a weird hill to die on.

If only people like r32 cared as much about all the youth pastors molesting kids as they did about trafficking conspiracies (the vast majority of kids who are molested are molested by someone they know well, they aren't being kidnapped by nefarious "traffickers")

Because it's a bunch of garbage. The people who made this movie are more interested in being worshiped as American die-hard Patriot heroes they could care less and in fact they're using these women and children as a way of propping themselves up if any get helped it has little to do with anything any of these men are doing.

The deplorables of course will continue supporting him fanatically and just say stupid s*** like how odd this all came just after he announced his run for senate and it's only because he's Disturbed the people in power.

Again, not a good look.

[quote]As an actual hispanic

Ballard, Cavaziel, or you?

[quote]are they NOT protraying a true story?

Where did I say they weren't true? Of course you can find examples of Hispanic sex traffickers. Of course they're part of the problem. But when experts look at exploited children, it is not nefarious Hispanics that make up the preponderance of the problem. Go back and re-read my last paragraph in which I report what the experts say: they receive tens of thousands of reports every year but because the vast majority of the perps are either a relative, a clergy or someone who works with kids, no one wants to deal with it, and they certainly won't fund the experts who will deal with it.

But they'll run out, in droves, buying tickets to a movie that focuses on a teeny, tiny portion of the problem, and it just happens(!) to be one that fits with their narrative. As such, it's not a documentary or expose; it's propaganda that's aimed at deplorable's vigilantism with all of the right elements that form a shield. Clearly, if you think Ballard is a conman who exploits these children all over again via film, and now accused of sexual misconduct and fraud, you must be part of the problem, right? Yeah, it's a

[quote]Weird hill to die on.

Indeed, if only Ballard were in this to help children. He's clearly in it for himself (he paid himself over half a million dollars out of his non-profit last year), for fame, to prop himself up (you know, like to run to succeed Mitt Romney in the Senate). Now his problem is he's been found out, and like every other Mormon conman who gets caught, it's always something or someone else to blame.

Mormons are greedy pervs.

R43, agree. I'd add that he's not just in it for the fame and the money, but also to molest women

The sound of sexual harassment.

R4 - male pattern baldness/receding hairline is the most conspicuous pattern I see.

R46 I read the scene Sean Reyes wrote for Sound of Freedom which includes him inserting himself as a Mary Sue type character. It's hilariously bad.

You can read the exploits of David Reyes here.