Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Italy's King Umberto II: Would he have been a Datalounger?

Enrico Montanari's work told how in 1927, when he was a young lieutenant in Turin, he was insistently courted by the then Prince Umberto, who even gave him a silver cigarette lighter bearing the inscription ‘Dimmi di sì!’ (‘ Say yes to me!’). No scandal arose from the hints contained in the biographies of the film-director (and duke) Luchino Visconti concerning – in more or less explicit terms – his relationship with the prince at the time when Umberto was considered one of the most eligible bachelors in Europe's royal families. Yet in 1930 Umberto married Princess Marie José of the Belgian Royal family, with whom he had four sons (including the current claimant to the Italian throne, Vittorio Emanuele). Nevertheless, the fact that the first was born only after four years of the couple's marriage gave rise to much gossip and rumors that the children had been conceived by artificial insemination; it was also said that they were the sons of other fathers, among them the Fascist leader Italo Balbo. Even Count Ciano, Mussolini's son-in-law, wrote in his diary on the occasion of a new pregnancy of Marie José: ‘I was left to understand that the child who will be born is his [Umberto's] without the intervention of doctors or syringes.’ This does not prove that the rumors were true – even if Domenico Bartoli comments on Ciano's assertions: ‘It can be seen that there were grains of truth to the gossip’ – but they do indicate the sort of notoriety which followed Umberto through his life. (Similar rumors circulated about his brother-in-law, Ludwig von Hassen).

Umberto did little to avoid such a reputation. For instance, he spent his wedding-night and his entire honeymoon in Courmayeur not with his wife but with a group of Turin officials and ‘friends’, to whom Umberto presented diamonds in the shape of a ‘U’. Afterwards, when Umberto called on his wife, he always had himself announced and visited her accompanied by someone else. It is not surprising that the Fascist secret police soon began to gather information about the ‘pederasty’ of the heir, either in order to blackmail him or as leverage to control him in the future, as Balbo himself disclosed to the king, in an attempt to safeguard himself from charges which enemies had circulated about his own relationship with Marie José. Furthermore, Umberto and his wife lived apart, except for a mimimun of contact necessary for the sake of appearances; they kept separate apartments, separate beds and separate friends.

Umberto, unlike his Savoy predecessors, was a fervent Catholic. He experienced his sexual transgressions, according to his biographers, as guilt-inducing erotic raptures. For Bartoli, ‘The prince was a true believer and a practicing Catholic almost to the point of fanaticism. Therefore, sensual urges had a satanic origin, yet he was unable to resist them. … Thus the consequences of his sins became a devastating burden. The exact nature of the sins, however, could only be whispered.’

Umberto liked to choose his partners from the military, with a preference for officers – Visconti was an officer at the time of their liaison – rather than common soldiers...

Among his supposed lovers at the time were the handsome French actor Jean Marais (later the companion of Jean Cocteau) and the boxer Primo Carnera, who won the world boxing championship in 1933. In response to questions about why Umberto once wanted to meet him in private, Carnera (quoted in Petacco) simply answered that ‘the prince had received him wearing a swimming costume and asked him to go for a swim with him in the pool. They then spent the afternoon alone together.’ Clearly, bathing costumes are fit for a king – especially when the visitor is endowed with a fine physique.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 14August 27, 2023 5:38 AM

Linky stinky.

by Anonymousreply 1August 24, 2023 5:16 AM

Link works for me.

by Anonymousreply 2August 24, 2023 5:18 AM

Interesting link. Thank you, OP.

by Anonymousreply 3August 24, 2023 12:24 PM

Another link

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 4August 24, 2023 5:51 PM

He was handsome when young. But guilty gay Catholics are way too much to deal with.

by Anonymousreply 5August 24, 2023 7:45 PM

I like the portrait by László of him in full drag.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 6August 24, 2023 8:24 PM

^ Yeah, I would have done him when he was young. I bet he got a lot of tail

by Anonymousreply 7August 24, 2023 8:25 PM

Looked kind of like Stanley Tucci when he got older

by Anonymousreply 8August 24, 2023 8:34 PM

Looks hot here

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 9August 25, 2023 2:50 AM

Someone should do a movie about him

by Anonymousreply 10August 25, 2023 4:53 PM

Datalounge? How common.

I think not.

by Anonymousreply 11August 25, 2023 5:04 PM

All four kings of Italy were ugly. Funny how lands which are home to so many hotties were ruled by such dogs.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 12August 25, 2023 5:28 PM

What a beautiful beard wedding!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 13August 26, 2023 7:36 PM

Bump

by Anonymousreply 14August 27, 2023 5:38 AM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!