Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Revisiting "Querelle"

Last night, thanks to the Criterion Channel, I watched "Querelle," a movie I hadn't seen in the 40 years since it was released ('82 in Europe, '83 here). I don't remember much about my initial theater viewing. It was in Dallas, perhaps at Highland Park Village or Northpark I & II; it wasn't the Inwood.

I was enamored by the art direction and aura of the film. I remember going in expecting much more gay erotica than what "Querelle" delivers. I dozed in a few spots and thought Jeanne Moreau got in the way and when onscreen, stopped the film cold. It was in German (I expected French) with English subtitles, and remember vividly one of them: "I give you only my ass." At the time I thought Brad Davis was OK; time has mellowed that as last night I found him hotter than hell, which of course the sociopath is meant to be.

But last night, I felt the film was even more of a chore to watch. It moves at a snail's pace, though kudos to Fassbinder for creating a mostly linear arc from Genet's from the hip (though poetic) storytelling. I found Moreau even more aggravating, hated Franco Nero, was jarred by the Genet quotations, and rolled my eyes as Querelle and the brother fought as a passion play progressed. Querelle getting fucked by NoNo was a highlight.

In short, I didn't think this was a very good film at all. Everyone acts as if they are zombies, and who knows what happens after Seblon and Querelle run away, offscreen, into a dark and foreboding place. This morning I read Vincent Canby's contemporary review of the film (linked; hopefully there isn't a paywall for archival items). He called it "a mess," and I have the same feelings. Do you? Is this a landmark of queer cinema, or just a Meyer-like exploitation of the supposedly shocking view of homosexuality in the 1980s?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 7June 10, 2023 11:44 PM

[quote]I dozed in a few spots

Maybe you dreamed you saw it.

by Anonymousreply 1June 10, 2023 11:20 PM

Good one r1!

by Anonymousreply 2June 10, 2023 11:26 PM

I agree, it is almost unwatchable. Pretty to look at, but the plot frames homosexuality as deviant and violent, so it’s just another trashy hit piece against gay men, like most media featuring gay characters from that time period.

by Anonymousreply 3June 10, 2023 11:31 PM

Genet is just so weird.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 4June 10, 2023 11:39 PM

Needed more anal. And kissing.

by Anonymousreply 5June 10, 2023 11:42 PM

I knew it sucked 40 years ago.

by Anonymousreply 6June 10, 2023 11:42 PM

I dozed off in a few parts of your review, OP.

by Anonymousreply 7June 10, 2023 11:44 PM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!