Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Mayor Eric Adams floats idea of New Yorkers housing migrants in ‘private residences’

Any spare rooms at Gracie Mansion?

Mayor Eric Adams now wants to start paying every day New Yorkers to shelter migrants in their own homes – as the Big Apple struggles to find beds for the thousands of asylum seekers still flooding into the city.

In his latest attempt to battle the ongoing migrant crisis, Adams on Monday floated a half baked “private residence” plan, which could possibly see local homeowners getting compensation to put up asylum seekers.

Hizzoner put forward the proposal as he revealed religious leaders had agreed to start housing adult male migrants overnight at 50 places of worship scattered across the five boroughs next month.

“There are residents who are suffering right now because of economic challenges. They have spare rooms. They have locales,” the mayor said, arguing his private residence proposal could put money back in the pockets of taxpayers.

Adams didn’t offer up specifics on how the plan would work – including how much New Yorkers could potentially receive per night to cover the cost of hosting a migrant. A spokesperson also did not respond when asked if the mayor would take in migrants at his home in Brooklyn.

He did say, however, that the city would pay places of worship a nightly rate of about $125 for each asylum seeker – which is cheaper than the $380 it costs to put up a migrant household – including a family with kids or just single adults – in one of its shelter hotels.

If the private residence plan went ahead, it could mean New Yorkers are being paid more to host a migrant than a foster parent is given to raise a child in the Empire State.

The state currently pays a daily allowance of $40 for children aged over 12 years, according to the Office of Children and Family Services.

“It’s cheaper and it’s a good investment for us to go to a family and assist them instead of placing people in large congregate settings or in these emergency hotels,” Adams insisted of his private home plan.

“And then if you are a family member where you are bilingual, you are going to be able to help the bilingual person that’s coming here.”

He added: “We should be recycling our own dollars. We should take this crisis and go to opportunities. That is how we can deal with this.”

Adams acknowledged that City Hall would need to get over a “30 day rule” for his plan to work.

Asked for clarity on the rule, a City Hall spokesperson later cited New York law that requires a guest to be living in a residence for 30 days before they can legally become a tenant.

“We’re trying to navigate all the rules of how to get it done,” he said when pressed for further details. “There are many layers to how someone can use their space. We want to make sure that we follow all the rules and those rules that need to be changed within my power, we will push to do so. If there’s rules that need to be changed on the state level, we’re going to reach out to our state colleagues to do so.”

Some homeowners were quick to rip the mayor’s plan as “nuts” and half-baked given the scarcity of details.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 24June 6, 2023 6:37 PM

(cont.)

“It would be absolute bedlam,” Park Slope resident Zainab Jah told The Post.

Her partner, Tim Naylor, who has owned their townhouse for 24 years, added migrants shouldn’t be getting a “free ride” when many New Yorkers “cannot afford a decent place of their own.”

“Even if it was worth it to homeowners, the city shouldn’t be spending our money on that kind of crap. You have enough New Yorkers who can barely afford to live,” he said.

“Before you know it we’re going to get flooded with even more migrants.”

Tom Harriman, who owns his condo in Park Slope, also weighed in on Adams’ latest migrant proposal, insisting the plan “seems really strange.”

“Who are these people? What are the housing conditions?” the 77-year-old retiree said.

He suggested the mayor was all talk, adding: “It’s all sound bites but you don’t find details.”

NYC Council Republican leader Joe Borelli posted on social media: “What are the goals? When do we stop paying? What is the off-ramp?”

The city is currently bursting at the seams to house 45,900 asylum seekers in the 157 emergency sites set up across the five boroughs.

Roughly 2,200 migrants arrived at city shelters in the last week alone, according to City Hall.

The Adams administration has come under fire of late for the ways in which it’s trying to deal with the crisis – including temporarily housing migrants in elementary school gyms.

The newly announced faith-based plan, which is part of a new two-year partnership with the New York Disaster Interfaith Services, has the capacity to house roughly 1,000 migrants initially.

As part of the program, the city will also open five daytime centers to provide migrant support during the day to allow the faith-based spaces to continue to offer their normal services to New Yorkers.

“Our city has witnessed an unprecedented influx of asylum seekers coming to New York City since last spring,” Pastor Gil Monrose, executive director of the Office of Faith-Based and Community Partnerships, said on Monday.

“I am really grateful that faith leaders are opening their doors to asylum seekers — providing their space as well as the hands of the community to care for them. New York is truly a city of faith.”

by Anonymousreply 1June 5, 2023 11:16 PM

Okay, but we’ll need to know their dick size before we commit.

by Anonymousreply 2June 5, 2023 11:46 PM

He should begin by example.

by Anonymousreply 3June 6, 2023 1:58 AM

Can you imagine?

by Anonymousreply 4June 6, 2023 2:15 AM

we Can have slaves again.

by Anonymousreply 5June 6, 2023 2:50 AM

OPEN BORDERS!

by Anonymousreply 6June 6, 2023 3:05 AM

[quote] Mayor Eric Adams floats idea of New Yorkers housing migrants in ‘private residences’

This was an inevitably. Before too much longer they'll "suggest" requisitioning of properties to accommodate our Central American "guests"..

Luckily for them the Constitution only forbids the forced quartering of soldiers. Not civilian freeloaders.

by Anonymousreply 7June 6, 2023 5:04 AM

Didn't they do this in England with Ukrainians?

by Anonymousreply 8June 6, 2023 5:37 AM

Many Americans are really sick of the burden of all the worlds people coming here with all of their problems. We can’t help fellow Americans who are sick and homeless off the street for fuck sake.

by Anonymousreply 9June 6, 2023 3:09 PM

Hizzoner first. He's got a rat trap somewhere in Brooklyn, doesn't he?

by Anonymousreply 10June 6, 2023 3:19 PM

CBS is rumored to be vacating W 57th Street soon and moving to a new building ion Hudson Yards (where ABC has landed). Maybe they can donate their skyscraper to the city and fill it with migrants ? Not too tough to create studio apartments out of offices.

by Anonymousreply 11June 6, 2023 3:25 PM

NYC's first 'safe drug and sex' vending machine giving out 𝒇𝒓𝒆𝒆 crack pipes, condoms and Narcan is already EMPTY less than 24 hours after it was installed. Also included was a 'safer smoking kit' containing a heavy stem, mouthpiece, pusher, 6 screens, chore filter and lip balm for people wanting to smoke crack

Officials hope to put syringes in the next ones.

By 9am on Tuesday - less than 24 hours after it was first displayed - all of the crackpipes had been taken.

Gone too were the condoms, the COVID-tests and the nicotine-gum. All that was left were a few fentanyl-testing strips.

The machine in Brownsville, Brooklyn, is the first of its kind in the Big Apple. The city's Democrats hailed it as a watershed, public health moment yesterday, calling a press conference to tout their initiative and promise more down the line.

by Anonymousreply 12June 6, 2023 3:29 PM

Wow, r12

by Anonymousreply 13June 6, 2023 4:55 PM

New Yorkers could've elected themselves an actual administrator to run the city (Kathryn Garcia).

They elected this illiterate vegan oaf instead.

by Anonymousreply 14June 6, 2023 5:16 PM

They should start putting them in all the empty rectories and convents. There must be thousands of them in NYC and across the country. We are already paying for them since the churches are still scamming the government of taxes.

by Anonymousreply 15June 6, 2023 5:32 PM

[quote] “It would be absolute bedlam,” Park Slope resident Zainab Jah told The Post. Her partner, Tim Naylor, who has owned their townhouse for 24 years, added migrants shouldn’t be getting a “free ride” when many New Yorkers “cannot afford a decent place of their own.”

A 24 year resident of Park Slope complaining about wealth inequality?! 24 years ago was when the residents of Park Slope eagerly welcomed gentrification of neighboring Fort Greene. What hypocrisy!

by Anonymousreply 16June 6, 2023 5:36 PM

Of course it would be a catastrophe but Adams is a big picture guy. You're giving a stipend to a NY resident who will put in back into the NY economy. He doesn't dwell on the dirty details like the potential for exploitation, on both sides of the transaction, or that placing migrants in personal residences won't allow for proper screening of criminality or gang affiliation.

by Anonymousreply 17June 6, 2023 5:42 PM

[quote] but Adams is a big picture guy.

Which MSNBC clown used that line?

by Anonymousreply 18June 6, 2023 6:01 PM

I agree R 14 - Garcia would have been a much better Mayor. Issues that are not at all addressed by this spitballing soundbite - how is everyone vetted and what about the liability - impossible problems.

Also - it is kind of little known, but if you live in a place for more than (I think) 30 days, either as a sublet or guest in certain types of hotels, you automatically gain a fair amount of tenants rights, and it is very hard for the person on the lease to kick you out. This was the way you could get a rent-controlled SRO set-up if you knew the rules and wanted one. It can also be horribly abused by people on the make. There was a big article in NY Mag last year about a woman who fought for years to get a non-paying sublettor and her daughter out of her West Village apartment.

by Anonymousreply 19June 6, 2023 6:15 PM

Maybe there could be an exchange program? I love sunshine and palm trees!

by Anonymousreply 20June 6, 2023 6:17 PM

This article is crazy:

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 21June 6, 2023 6:17 PM

NYC is full of liberals who believe "No Human is Illegal." Great idea, and I can't wait to see these refugees settled into private homes.

by Anonymousreply 22June 6, 2023 6:21 PM

Young male migrants make such easygoing, helpful citizens. They really take the time to assimilate and always obey the law, even when it is in direct opposition to their culture.

by Anonymousreply 23June 6, 2023 6:36 PM

Just. Say. No.

by Anonymousreply 24June 6, 2023 6:37 PM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!