Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s Netflix Docuseries Being Tapped for an Emmy Nomination

Damn. Look at her busting out the top of her dress and straining the seams..

That's from the evening Harry reneged on his appearance at a memorial concert as Captain of the Royal Marines so he could attend the Lion King premiere to corner Bob Iger on the red carpet and publicly coerce him into casting Meghan in the upcoming elephant movie.

They will lose. The Emmy nominating committee may nominate them, although it's highly doubtful since their stupid reality show contained so many lies. However, the Emmy voters cannot stand these two and will not vote for them. .

Get ‘em’ Meg. You and the Royal Capper are doing big things. Lying ass cunts, don’t ever bring your stankin asses back to NYC.

THIS WILL BE THEIR CORNATION! Imagine them on the red carpet? Will they talk to Laverne Cox? Will Oprah and Gayle ride with them in the limo? This is GOLD.

Klan Granny thread. OP, it's been so nice without all these types of threads cluttering DL. Why did you have to go and do this?

Truth in a documentary isn’t a requirement for an Emmy nomination? Interesting.

Jealous, haters?

Oh, I think so.

Assuming the nominating committee actually watches the series, won't they notice how staged it is? Like receiving some critical text from William while they're being interviewed or the manufactured paparazzi chase fleeing from a lone cyclist.

R6 don’t worry, the Spam Mammies will be here soon to defend their Queen.

R10 is another one blocked. Another klan granny gone. Yay.

R11 has a fruitful life

R11 is dead to me!

R6 The Windsors are attention seeking liars.

Much more fruitful without klan grannies cluttering up my DL.

[QUOTE]Windsors are attention seeking

Yes, that's where their adage "Never complain, never explain." comes from.

The article reeks of what their publicists hope for, not what's happening.

As usual.

The Emmys better not be held on any of either of Harry's rugrats' birthdays!

[quote] The Emmys better not be held on any of either of Harry's rugrats' birthdays!

Don't worry.

NOTHING will stop me from getting my Emmy!

Marie Claire exists to help Meghan manifest.

[quote]The article reeks of what their publicists hope for, not what's happening.

[quote]Marie Claire exists to help Meghan manifest.

YES R17 and R20. That's exactly what she does. She shoots her rockets of desire into The Vortex via these puff pieces. Then she spends her days acting "as if" she already has what she wants (delusions of grandeur). She's playing 5-D chess lol

Hope she finds a better gown than the one she wore to the Awards ceremony in Manhattan last month.

I wonder if they can afford to buy a Golden Globe?

[quote] I wonder if they can afford to buy a Golden Globe?

Can William the Terrible and Waity Katie afford one?

“Waity Katie”? Is that the best that you can do? She will be the next Queen and that just kills you doesn't it, R24?

How are the Clown Car Couple doing, R24?

[quote] “Waity Katie”? Is that the best that you can do? She will be the next Queen and that just kills you doesn't it, R24?

Don't hold your breath.

Rose Hanbury may still get the job.

Never say never.

R23 It is possible.

R1- R300

Poor R29.

Old Granny suffering from dementia.

These grannies take affront at anything less than worshipful of Willy and Kate. As if any of us Americans give a shit about her being queen. We are mocking you, dear.

And they rise to the bait every time.

No, R31, you do it to hide your shame at backing a couple of lying grifters like the Sussexes. However the deflection isn’t working, is it?

Isn’t it time for your weekly shop at CVS?

[quote]The article reeks of what their publicists hope for, not what's happening. As usual.

Prince Harry has 'LOST all sense of perspective!' | Phil Dampier

Do they award acting Emmys to realty show stars? Meghan's a lock, if they do. Harry, not so much.

Can't wait to see her outfit!

You know, in all the ranking about the Harkles, why don't we ever discuss how bad of an actress she is.

I just caught a bit of Suits. She is horrible. How did she get the part, let alone get to remain such a major character for the majority of the show. It's good they've turned to docudramas and Oprah interviews because acting is not something she should ever have done.

I now understand why her public appearances are so contrived and phony seeming. She can't act her way out of a paper bag.

OP: It could happen? Yes, and I could become the queen of Romania.

It hasn't happened yet. Regarding H&M, it's all speculation. Regarding me, well, maybe.

R37 😂 Is she really that bad? I’ve never actually seen her anything.

Well, if they are nominated, they'll have to be brought in the back entrance to avoid them being triggered by all the paps. We all know how private they are.

[quote][R37] 😂 Is she really that bad? I’ve never actually seen her anything.

In suits, she's horrible.

She's so bad that you'd think that the role she was hired to portray was a bad actress in some fictional bad movie.

It's mindboggling that she got cast in the first place compared to the other actors in the show.

Prince Harry sends you daft klan grannies his regards from his 21st century home.

He looks to be enjoying himself without the Mrs.

If they are Emmy nominated, E will be there to show Meghan and H departing in the limo. Hell, we'll probably see her getting dressed and styled.

Why would Netflix campaign for them when they’ve shitcanned them?

[quote]Prince Harry sends you daft klan grannies his regards from his 21st century home.

Why is it that hating the Harkles MUST be a race issue, rather than his being a moron and her being entitled and insufferable?

Seriously, their absurd douchey behavior couple with their whining about being royals is more than enough to hate them without race coming into the equation.

There is plenty to hate about the Harkles just for their being them.

Okay, Emmy. Get ready for a near catastrophic car chase.

Because, if you hate them, you will undoubtedly antagonize Black people and many liberals, who will conclude you are racist.

One would think after The Cut interview a lot of people who were supporters have changed their opinions on the Sussexes, They have less staying power than Donald Trump unfortunately, because Trump is dangerous while the Sussexes are entertaining.

Clowns dress the part.😂

R48 If you "hate" people you don't know based on what the media tells you. There's a name for you hon.

DERANGED. [more deranged; most deranged] : unable to think or act in a normal or logical way especially because of severe mental illness : crazy or insane.

"if you hate them, you will undoubtedly antagonize Black people and many liberals"

That may have been true at the time of the wedding, but I don't think it's true now!

I think the public now believes that Meg is a basic bitch and Harry has gone from Hot to Hot Mess, they are unpopular and not because of racial issues. And I'm doing all my hating on Harry these days, Meg is just your basic SoCal bitch, while anyone who's read Harry's book knows he's a psychological toxic waste dump. Which makes him much more interesting than her...

[quote]Which makes him much more interesting than her...

Nothing makes him interesting.

Entertaining - sure. But, there's insufficient substance to generate interest.

Actually, R53, to someone who takes an interest in psychology, particularly abnormal psychology, Harry *can* be interesting!

I read his awful book, and although I'm as fond as anyone of playing Armchair Psychologist, I have no clue what the fuck is wrong with him, he's such a mess. I mean PTSD and a low IQ worsened by long-term substance abuse, plus... what? He's so irrational and indifferent to killing people that seriously, does he have one of the personality disorders that features a "clinical lack of empathy"? Seriously, he put out that book intending it to make him look good, and that's what I think of him after reading it.

Harold is some kind of borderline/narcissist with a scoop of Famous Disease.

That's why R53 and her fellow loons been interested/obsessed with him for years.

R54 it's never off is it Tiny.

R48 Shouldn't you be waving a flag at the Miami courthouse?

[quote]I think the public now believes that Meg is a basic bitch and Harry has gone from Hot to Hot Mess, they are unpopular and not because of racial issues.

You must be in the UK because no one here in the "public" hears about these two unless it's daytime tv watching frauen.

[quote]Actually, [R53], to someone who takes an interest in psychology, particularly abnormal psychology, Harry *can* be interesting!

While I concede the point that it *could* make someone interesting, in this case Harry himself is just your garden variety, entitled, immature spoiled brat with a low IQ who with both mommy and daddy issues who has been erroneously led to believe his entire life that he's special.

His inane, contradictory, and hypocritical testimony validates what we've all come to believe about him in the various Harkle threads (sans the true klan grannies who used to come here).

R60 they are still here, doll.

R54 reminds me of that rich kid (killed someone with his car), where the court determined he shouldn't be subjected to normal consequences, due to suffering from "affluenza". Thought at the time it was a bs term, made up on the fly, just to excuse that particular privileged little prick, but maybe there's something to it. Shouldn't be used to excuse crimes and bad behavior of course -- however, suppose it's not far fetched the wealthy/ privileged develop a distinct type of apathy/ victim complex, deserving of it's own category.

It would explain why he has complaints regular people find obnoxious. It's something few would understand because it's a lifestyle most people don't experience. Like the bedroom complaint, or their housing arrangement after marriage -- just not something regular people can fathom complaining about because it comes across as ridiculous when coming from someone that's lived such a privileged lifestyle. A lot like when we had to listen to the wealthy celebrities complain about covid restrictions, all while doing so from the comfort of their luxurious mansions.

It tells us how fucked up America is though, when you don't even have to be liked to be "famous". I put them in the same category as the Kardashians, where no one seems to like them, yet they are everywhere and highly successful. They are untouchable for some reason.

R62 Thanks for your profound vision, now back to lunch Tiny

[quote]...or their housing arrangement after marriage

This bit really really annoyed me since neither of the Sussex pair mentioned that William and Kate, along with baby George lived in the exact same "Nottingham Cottage" after they were married.

Other previous residents were the Duke and Duchess of Gloucester, and Diana's sister Jane Fellowes and her husband Robert.

But, of course, not good enough for the Dim Prince and his wife.

"no one over 18 stone seems to like them"

Fixed for R63

Rather hilariously Marie Claire doesn't have Harry and Meghan in either of their top documentaries of 2022 or 2023 lists

^Cuz it was self-serving and boring as shit.

R68 Cuz there was no rocky road !

KGT has a weight fixation, I am assuming it stems from Mommy. Poor dear.

KGT is like the crazies who use to post in Markle threads about surrogency and/or non=existent children. It's juvenile nuttiness and nowwhere near pointless bitchery.

Nowhere near pointless butchery?

These deluded douchenozzles couldn’t find their ass, let alone pointless butchery, if you handed them a map.

It would be nice if the competition was somewhere close to the level we expect but these hosers fail every time they type.

^ Sure Klan

He just likes to pointlessly "butcher" deranged royalass fat fraus . Much the way R72 butchers her chicken.

Time for some new material, R73. It has been for quite some time.

they've run out of gas and by now no-one's paying attention to them, R75

they have been total failures, here and elsewhere

like the objects of their delusional obsession

Netflix CANCELS Heart of Invictus! GOOD JOB, HARRY!

Understandably, R77, as it had gone from “Heart of Invictus” to “Outfits on Meghan”

It’s not about wounded vets any more. More like what a famewhore’s wearing.

R1 She's pretty and you're an idiot. I think Markle is a tone deaf cunt but you're complaining just for the sake of it.

It's not true that the Invictus project has been cancelled. Stop dragging shitty frau garbage in here.

The question I am seeing asked on line is exactly how much money did Mrs. Harry spend on outfits (clothes & jewelry) that she wore at the recent games in The Hague.

And were the bills for said outfits sent to and paid by the Invictus Organization?

And is it true that after complaints, Mrs. Harry reimbursed Invictus?

[quote]The question I am seeing asked on line

Why? I'm not seeing that. Are you feverishly scouring for it on royal sites? Hasn't popped up on my any feeds of mine.

r82 Twitter, Reddit, Instagram

Oh, sites I don't pay attention to due to fake news and trollery.

Yet you troll and pass on fake new here r84

What news have I faked, dear? I've been here since 1995. When did you start trolling?

Normally if an actor has any talent or any presence on the screen even in a C list basic cable series like Suits, their work and personality would have jumped off the screen to get offers of more prestigious gigs. Check out Meghan's IMDB page. She was getting nothing and reaching the end of her acting career.

As R80 knows full (assuming it can read) the Invictus Games have not been cancelled, but as the article says, the Harkles Netflix show about them, featuring the Duchess’s numerous expensive outfits, has been cancelled. Next flux is skint - they don’t have money to waste.

We might respect your arguments more if you weren’t dishonest - trashing sources you disagree with after lying about what they don’t say.

[quote] Check out Meghan's IMDB page. She was getting nothing and reaching the end of her acting career

Because she was working on Suits at the time, dumbass!!

Was she supposed to be working on 5 different shows at the same time, Granny?

The point would be that she had nothing in the hopper AFTER Suits. Unusual after being on a long-running series that she wasn't able to book anything.

Next flux = Netflix in R89

What does “cancelled” mean? Is it just that Netflix won’t be streaming it in autumn 2023? Does Archewell own the intellectual property? Or does Netflix? I’m assuming that the project is finished. The games have ended and the editing and post should have been finished already.

Perhaps they’re trying to shop it around to other streamers or cable channels.

It doesn’t make sense. And I won’t believe it until a reputable industry source reports it.

She did work on other things while Suits was on hiatus. If you want to watch some truly awful acting, Dater’s Handbook, a Hallmark movie. You win a prize if you can tolerate more than 20 minutes. It’s so bad.

Dude, you put on a fucking Hallmark movie just to hate on her acting???

Thst's crazy. I mean, really seriously crazy.

When revealing the fact that Markle was only No.6 on the Call Sheet of a cheap basic cable show, Tina Brown pinned her to the butterfly board as a moth. Death's Head Moth.

And it's time for the klan grannies to come out.

R96 is Lipstick Alley down for maintenance?

R94. I think you are the crazy one.

Wall Street Journal announced that Spotify has dumped Meghan's podcast for a "lack of productivity" and they'll be forfeiting a giant chunk of the $20 M advance they got. Here comes another tell-all book.

That’s all that you have left, isn’t it, R96? I almost feel sorry for you, at persistently following the clown car duo.

But not quite.

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

^ Harkles get BUPKIS; their "empire" is getting washed away like a sandcastle:

No r94, I wanted to see an example of her acting that wasn’t just YouTube clips and wasn’t interested in watching a tv series that was mostly about other people. It was a stupid movie but a couple of the other actors were good, natural, and that highlighted how stiff and artificial she was. When you mostly watch top rated shows with talented actors, it’s easy to forget that there’s a whole world of mediocrity out there.

I only watched the first Suits but Rachel Zane was bitchy and egotistical so it was obviously not a stretch. I gather that continued throughout the show but that she was supposed to be sexy and occasionally vulnerable, too. Bad actress.

With Spotify getting cancelled - and humiliating them by pointing out how unproductive Meghan is - her cartoon show on Netflix cancelled and rumors rife that Harry's Invictus reality show is going to be dumped by Netflix, they appear to have hit a dead end.

I always wondered what their endgame actually was. Could they become billionaires a la Kim Kardashian for gossiping and merching? Looks like it hasn't worked out.

Lillibucks will be going into modeling soon, just watch.