David Eggers is NAKED TO ME!!!

It looks like a painting. I can't masturbate to that.

And I even disabled my AdBlock.

Now THAT is a holebreaking work of staggering genius.

Good for him, but what's with just that one facial expression? Isn't he an actor? He looks like some random chav on the streets of Liverpool.

[quote] Look at that schlong.

And look at his two low hanging Eggers.

Is that rendering generated by AI?

I’m skeptical.

Is all that really in here?

[quote]He looks like some random chav on the streets of Liverpool.

Doubtful. No headhider.

Amazon has one of his movies, Station to Station, and it's listed as "LGBTQ." None of the reviews say whether this means "gay," and I read that his character gets involved with someone named Sarah. Probably more TQ than G. Too bad. A dong like that deserves the kind of attention it could get in a gay story.

Penis looks delicious

Am I missing something? Those are just sketches.

WHO??????

Here's the pinga in the flesh, from some indie movie or short he was in

Nice to see a real cock at R12 instead of a prosthetic

It's what Ben Affleck wishes he'd shown us in Goon Girl.

Damn, very hot

R12 Mmmm

Objects on my screen are larger than they appear.

…appear larger in my ass

At last. After 40 God damned years: there's the beef!

He can slap m y face with that thing!

Well, that's quite the hog! I love his eyes. They're big and sad and sexy.

"The torpedo shape."

He was robbed.

More photos in this thread.

r24 Dong and dog. Doubly irresistible.

[quote] Amazon has one of his movies, Station to Station, and it's listed as "LGBTQ." None of the reviews say whether this means "gay," and I read that his character gets involved with someone named Sarah. Probably more TQ than G. Too bad. A dong like that deserves the kind of attention it could get in a gay story.

Not to worry R8, his character is bisexual (from before the film even starts, it's not a coming out story) and over the course of the film has straight sex, gay sex, and a bisexual foursome with a male sex-worker friend and his clients. It's a pretty straightforward arthouse indie drama, I thought it was pretty good, especially the last stretch and ending, which were pretty profound.

The other characters are a mix of gay, straight, and bi, and all have very different backgrounds and stories going on. The film is kind of about all of them, told through the eyes of the Eggers character. They don't all get as naked as Eggers does, but they spend a lot of time without their clothes!

Nice dick, indeed.

He's handsome in a way that doesn't seem fake or overly coiffed. Nice.

[quote] Doubtful. No headhider.

Oh, dear.

[quote] Is all that really in here?

R7, Check out his interview in Eroticco magazine. Not only is it a great read (he seems smart and serious about acting) the photos give a clear confirmation that, yeah, all that is definitely there.

Love a heavy hanging thick slab of meat.

Who is he?

He has very nice eyes.

Why is he that lavender grey color? Is the unreal complexion supposed to make his dongful nekkidity more palatable to sensitive eyes?

[R31] He's an actor. Not famous, but pretty decent credits.

*lifts caftan*

[quote] Now THAT is a holebreaking work of staggering genius.

That is one BRILLIANT and deeply underrated comment R2. (First thing I noticed was the similarity in names, as well.)

I'm dying. Well done!

R33 that's the artist (Murlin St. Jean's style). He photographs the nude body and renders the models in colors. He's a pretty successful commercial photographer, but his artistic stuff is all about exploring the body, American taboos and hangups with the nude body, and using art to provoke. I've been following him for a while.

His work is amazing if you're into that kind of stuff. It definitely provokes and his journals give you a sense of what he's doing from an artists standpoint. I've been hoping to see a gallery show of his at some point here in NY, because it would be awesome to see all those nude bodies and all that color in a larger more in-your-face way.

David's actually on the "bigger" side for his models, but I guess that's true of David in life, as well. But there are some seriously hot guys in the mix, and women, as well. Murlin's work is very diverse in terms of backgrounds, ages, ethnicity, lifestyles, body shapes, and its all really cool and experimental.

Who got to fluff him for that?

nice weiner

He can probably do it himself, R38.

huge cock on that kid, good for him.

yum.

I see a little Taron realness in this shot

vpl.

He seems rather basic, nothing special. Maybe his penis-enlargement surgery will pay-off.

He seems just fine to me R45, definitely as good or better than a lot of 20-somethings out there.

And believe you me, if penis enlargement surgery could actually make you look like THAT, I'd sign over my house savings IMMEDIATELY. (Of course, if it could make you look like that AND do it on the budget of an aspiring but oft-unemployed actor, I'd probably have to get on a 10-year waiting list with every other man in America!)

Damn, he's just as sexy (maybe more?) wearing clothes! (I feel like I should apologize for the feels I get looking at the two shots from the movie or show where he's being held captive and tortured, but I'm not going to...)

WHERE'S THE BEEF?

R34 I have seen Station to Station. It is way too long (2+ hours and talky talky talky) and a lot of the acting is B-A-D...and some of the dialogue is cringey but it is watchable and lights up in some scenes and I am surprised it is not in the DL canon because (SPOILERS AHEAD, MARY SUE!):

It is the kind of "drifter finds his way to a new town and infiltrates a family" story that Tennessee Williams and William Inge loved.

1) Eggers plays a mostly nice guy—albeit not as nice as he thinks he is—but this is the twist: He is like the Schwarzenegger son Arnold had with the maid. the character was raised in this uber rich media tycoon/succession/Murdoch environment as the son of the maid...He thought his father was missing but his father was Rupert.

2) He has a very big penis and it is part of his character's identity and he knows how to use it and allude to it to get what he wants

3) He identifies as bisexual

He gets scouted by a (is-he-or-isn't-he-a-predator?) older gay guy who has one of the Frat Pad type cam houses in Las Vegas...but to be the house handy man. That is the "family" I mentioned before.

There is all sorts of drama with the various scantily clad boys of the house and the owner is constantly playing head games with the boys and also constantly freaking out about money since OnlyFans etc. has killed the cam house business model.

There's an absolutely awful subplot with a neighbor girl he falls in love with.

It's an indie but he does show off his dick nicely in one scene and he has one great sex scene with another male character...kind of a hate-fuck.

As I said, it is too long, too talky, and some of the acting is terrible. Two of the female characters and one of the males speak in that froggy vocal trill thing that just makes me murderous, but I suppose it is accurate. Eggers is an OK actor and is very cute and looks like Topher Grace with a big cock. The story has some surprises and is watchable, but it is strictly film festival material.

The movie only works with a guy with a big show-er of a dick so I wondered how it was cast...but Eggers is listed as a co-producer so maybe he was attached from its genesis.

[quote]It is the kind of "drifter finds his way to a new town and infiltrates a family" story that Tennessee Williams and William Inge loved.

And Pam Long.

LMAO R50.

I've seen it, too, and I think that's a pretty fair analysis R49. (I too am surprised it hasn't been salivated over/praised/critiqued/torn to shreds here on DL, as we're wont to do, but maybe that's for the best). I'm not as critical of the film since I learned on Wikipedia that it was a first film for the writer/director (same guy), first lead for Eggers (who is in every scene), and was made for some ridiculously small amount of money (something like $23K) during the COVID-19 shutdown in Vegas. With that kind of budget, your pool of talent isn't gonna include Meryl Streep.

It IS talky, and that does seem to be a love it/hate it thing (I'm a big fan of Richard Linklater and Ed Burns, so I'm cool with it), but the length is a valid criticism. My guess is the first-time director wanted to feature everybody as equally as possible and give them each a "big moment" in the film (and, to be fair, I think they all do well with those moments, but it's fair to say they weren't all necessary to the main character's story.) I'm sure the writer and director learned a lot making his first film, which to his credit is fucking AMBITIOUS and pretty good on balance, and given a more conventional budget and casting options, could make some seriously great LGBT cinema in the future. For that reason alone, I'm more fan than critic when it comes to the film.

Coming back to that first thought, I am kind of glad we didn't do our typical DL thing with it. There isn't a lot of gay cinema out there that willing to put put that many gay/bisexual characters (who aren't coming out or self-hating), that much penis, and that much gay/bi sex onscreen unapologetically in a true, well-written, way. It's always low-budget sex comedies that reinforce stereotypes or a "prestige" film where a Hollywood star (usually straight) flashes penis long enough to be called brave (once and only once!) and the gay sex scenes are more implied than depicted. Station to Station is the kind of film I'd like to see more of, that probably only COULD be made by an indie filmmaker during a pandemic with green actors, as Hollywood (even the "indie friendly" studios) and money people would have watered it down at every step. And it probably only could have been made by a first-timer who didn't know what they weren't "supposed" to do or have interests to protect. So I'm showing support, sincerely. And whether it's the filmmaker or Eggers himself, I saw a lot of promise that could do a lot for our LGBT film canon in the years to come IF we don't tear them apart and discourage them from ever doing it again.

And I didn't mind the subplot with the neighbor! She was cute.

R52 $23K? I had no idea and it definitely is an achievement when viewed through that lens. I thought it had a lot of surprises plus I am a perv so I liked seeing the peen. I liked the line where the owner of the boy hut or whatever it was said something like "oh you're rich and have a big cock, cry me a river."

That also makes sense about most of the actors getting their one moment (in lieu of $, something they could use in their reel). I liked how Tom thought he was so right about everyone...and he was wrong. They were a family. Yet the audience still liked him. That only works with a character you are rooting for.

I still don't get why at the end sharing the cab to McCarran with the stranger-girl he put his hand on his crotch. I'm assuming it was a signal to the viewer that he had not really learned anything at all about himself (because that was how he got the owner's attention in the beginning in the gay bar).

Eggers is cute, promising as a leading man, and hung as hell. I've paused and rewound quite a few times.

R49, yes!!! Tennessee Williams and William Inge...such a perfect comparison. I remember thinking during the big argument in the kitchen (and what happened afterward) that it was giving Tennessee Williams, but you're 100% right. The whole film really does. It might have actually worked better as a play, now that I think of it.

R52, think you're right about the writer-director wanting to give everybody an equal "big moment." TBH, I would have cut a couple to get to a perfect runtime (and up the film's acting "average") but the film still works long...just would be better shorter. I also want to see what this filmmaker (and Eggers) will do with the lessons learned from STATION TO STATION, because if they were bold enough to start with something like this, there could be some excellent gay cinema in our future.

[quote] Eggers is cute, promising as a leading man, and hung as hell.

way to bury the lede!

I saw that differently R53, [non-plot significant spoiler ahead], but your interpretation is interesting. To me, it looked like he started to do the same thing and got a positive response, then pulls back (literally) and looks out the window instead of at her, making me think he had learned something.

BUT, I kind of like thinking of it both ways. Like he's learned something but has he really changed? We all like to think we've changed right after the decision, but before we've done the actual work and, well, that's not great, lol. I bought the movie, so I'm gonna go back and rewatch that now. That may have been more interesting than I realized...

-R49

Great big beautiful cock.

mutilated

[quote]And look at his two low hanging Eggers.

😂

Eggers is a German surname.

Is he from the Midwest?

R59, Long Island, NY. His professional acting profiles say he's still based there.

How long till he does porn?

Oh, man, I need to see this guy in something new soon. He didn't go into porn (good for him) but did he go into hiding instead? Hope we don't find out David is now born again and working at a hedge fund on Wall Street. That would be such a waste.

[quote] He seems rather basic, nothing special.

I think that's what makes his big dick that much more special.

He's so unassuming to look at, and then when he drops his pants..... BAM!

There's this beautiful, thick cock staring you in the face.

He's mutilated.

Didn't the 'OMG, He's Naked' blog always specialize in really good fakes?

Whether they did or didn't, he's done several shoots over the years with different photographers and appeared in at least one film frontally nude. The cock's pretty consistently big in all of them (with normal variation). Dude's just blessed.

Pretty wide selection of photos linked below

pretty eyes, too.

He's fucking gorgeous with a full head of hair. Wow. Thanks for sharing those additional pics, [R66]. Just the right amount of working class authenticity and masculine energy for me, with none of that toxic bro bullshit. The dick is just a bonus. Yeah, let's see him in more stuff, pelase.

He's kind of a whore.

Borderline porn star.

Most mainstream actors would never....

Even when he's fully dressed (and cute as hell), that penis can't be contained. Poor guy, lol. I am sure being this blessed is inconvenient at times.

Since it's Instagram at R70, he is obviously "advertising" his cock, because he controls what photos get put on his IG page.

Like I said, he's a WHORE.

He'll never be more than a C-list/D-list actor.

No one can take him seriously.

But hey, there's always OnlyFans.

Who? Is he a fag or what?

He's hot as fuck. Mama likey!

What a weird place to be sex negative/body shame R69 / R71 sure you're on the right site? Posing nude or doing full frontal in films makes you a "whore" and "borderline porn star" now? Tell that to Cooper Koch, Jamie Dornan, and countless others who've posed nude for reputable photographers and done nude scenes in films. He has no requirement to be ashamed of or hide his penis (or where the most modest underwear possible to minimize his dick when out at a music festival) to prove he's not a "whore" or be seen as acceptable to mainstream audiences.

Last time I checked, David's credits include only mainstream work, including a season on a wholesome Amazon college sitcom with Lizzie McGuire's Clayton Snyder, various network show guest or extra appearances, a trippy sci-fi horror film, several commercials, and a lead role in an R-rated film where he *played* a guy who briefly works as an adult entertainer while in Vegas before returning home to face his demons (that's the role he was fully nude in). He's never done soft or hardcore work, never leaked a sex tape, never been photographed with an erection or touching himself (or anyone else). He's never gone near OF over a 10 yearcareer. He's a mainstream actor because, well, he's a mainstream actor. Even the nude that started this thread was with a known, well-regarded experimental artist in NYC who confronts stereotypes about mainstream attractivenss and discomfort with nudity in society.

With Project 2025 calling for (and new laws being proposed in some states) to literally ban nude photos and art as "porn" if they could be considered sexy or sexual, we don't need that mess around here. No one needs to hide having an attractive body (or body part) in 2025, and, for goodness sake, nudity in and of itself is not "porn" ror does it reflect poorly on the morality and virtue of the nude person. Not doing this in 2025.

Those eyes make me swoon. They're limpid pools. But that weapon he's got hanging betwixt his thighs tells me one thing, there is a God.

I'll bet that big ol' thang brings all the boys to his yard.

R69 / R70 , so I guess award-winning actor and respected husband and father Jamie Dornan is a "borderline porn star" and whore who will never amount to much as a mainstream actor or model, then?

Any Google search of "Jamie Dornan nude" will result in dozens of photos (which range from his 20s modeling career to now, with the sexiest of them, the rainbow coloured ones coming well after he was already a successful and famous actor but before his major awards nominations and prestige roles of late, so they obviously didn't hurt a thing in his career) beg to differ...

Please do not defame my new husband David Eggers and his ginormous penis.

I consider his to be one of the most beautiful penises ever appended from a human body.