Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry 'planning feature-length movie on royal life for Netflix'

They will reportedly recount their experience of living inside the palace and royal life.

(They never lived in the Palace.)

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 91June 17, 2023 12:47 PM

She spent more time talking about the RF than actually in the RF.

by Anonymousreply 1May 24, 2023 12:15 AM

"There are a lot of nuances from their story that they feel are still missing after the documentary and Harry's book," a source tells Closer magazine.

The source says the couple were "obviously happy" with their paycheque from Netflix for the documentary and are "keen" to work with the streaming giant again.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 2May 24, 2023 12:16 AM

[quote]"There are a lot of nuances from their story that they feel are still missing after the documentary and Harry's book," a source tells Closer magazine.

They are grasping at that, thinking that if people could just see the nuances, then people will rally to their side.

by Anonymousreply 3May 24, 2023 12:18 AM

Whew lordy, site about to go into Primetyme with all this Harkle spam

by Anonymousreply 4May 24, 2023 12:21 AM

I wonder if their strategy is to release BRF-related content for the next few years until their kids are old enough to start making family content (not lowly YouTube videos lol, but like documentaries or something). Because I get the feeling they will need to stay in the public eye to stay afloat. There’s probably no other option.

by Anonymousreply 5May 24, 2023 12:36 AM

They really haven't told their story often enough!

by Anonymousreply 6May 24, 2023 12:49 AM

Tyler Perry can't pay their bills forever!

by Anonymousreply 7May 24, 2023 12:53 AM

Doesn't he have money that could be invested so his family can live on that income? Then they could devote their time to representing some charity that's important to them, even though that kind of work doesn't pay big salaries. That would be a dignified way of life, serving an honorable purpose to benefit some worthy cause. Instead of what they're doing now, hustling for the sake of publicity like a couple of money-grubbing hucksters.

by Anonymousreply 8May 24, 2023 1:26 AM

Their royal trauma dumps could be ported to any number of exciting new technologies. They could do a ChatGPT collab “What if I was the heir?”, or do a televised therapy session in a self-driving car. Perhaps a Discord special where they watch their own Netflix series for some reason. Endless possibilities.

by Anonymousreply 9May 24, 2023 1:47 AM

[quote]Because I get the feeling they will need to stay in the public eye to stay afloat.

Doubtful. I know that's the line from the usual Sussex hater types, because they need to believe that "everybody hates them" and "they're going broke" and such, but there's little chance that Harry has run through all his mother's money AND the podcast money AND the book money. In a few years, maybe, but not at this point.

by Anonymousreply 10May 24, 2023 1:50 AM

[quote] Then they could devote their time to representing some charity that's important to them

They do the Invictus Games and there are a few charity appearances that never get attention, mainly because the tabloids can't exploit it. An awards ceremony where Harry is a surprise guest can be exploited, Meghan showing up in regular clothes to help women open their own small businesses can't.

Someone said on another thread that they needed good PR to tell them to stop complaining so much and release more positive, fun messages, and I'm guessing they finally got that.

by Anonymousreply 11May 24, 2023 1:52 AM

They are miserable and humorless so positive and fun is not possible.

by Anonymousreply 12May 24, 2023 2:00 AM

She's spent more time bitching about the royal family than she ever spent in it.

by Anonymousreply 13May 24, 2023 2:10 AM

It is just amazing how they so boldly rejected the royal life after a very brief stint for a new private independent life. Yet they continue to grift and support their lifestyle from talking about nothing else.

by Anonymousreply 14May 24, 2023 2:14 AM

Of course they are. They aren't nearly as interesting on their own.

by Anonymousreply 15May 24, 2023 2:41 AM

The horse is dead and they are bringing back it's corpse to beat it again

by Anonymousreply 16May 24, 2023 2:47 AM

What we have here is another story by a British tabloid to get all the Harry and Meghan haters riled up. Then it will be proven to be a lie, like many of the other tabloid stories, and it will just stay out there and never addressed, because that is how the tabloids work. Before you get all pissed, wait for an official release by Netflix and not a story trafficking in the Harry and Meghan hate industry.

by Anonymousreply 17May 24, 2023 2:48 AM

R17, we are still waiting for the Spare retractions and corrections.

by Anonymousreply 18May 24, 2023 12:26 PM

Shit, I just saw one of these Sussex hater trolls say Harry hadn't even finished writing Spare yet! What kind of cheap-ass trollbot outfit has been hired for this kind of stuff, and why?

by Anonymousreply 19May 24, 2023 12:29 PM

So far, this is just a rumour. But if it isn't, it shows that Harry and Meghan have realised that for them, there is no "moving on" (as they promised after Oprah, Netflix, Spare . . .) because they have nothing else to sell that anyone will buy.

As poster above pointed out, they never for one moment as a married couple lived in any palace. They lived in the grounds of Kensington Palace in Nottingham Cottage, and then in Frogmore Cottage.

If they use any footage that isn't in the public domain, the Palace can sue for invasion of privacy.

And, given that Harry now faces a 400,000 quid bill for the court case he just lost re demanding judicial review of the Home Office's refusal to let him hire public serving police officers at will, and will likely lose the one he recently filed asking for judicial review of the reasoning the Home Office used in stripping him of his armed police protection in the first place, in their shoes I would think twice about trying on private footage taken inside any royal dwellings without permission.

They're clinging frantically to the royal adjacency that they themselves debased when they left.

There are other rumours circulating that the King is considering turning Harry's ducal title into a life peerage only, thereby ensuring that Harry can't pass on to his descendants any emblem of their once-royal adjacency beyond the farcical titles of his two American kids, who live in an environment in which those titles mean nothing. If the King does so, it means that all Harry's and Meghan's royal posturing ends with Archie and Lili.

Imagine a full-length (90 minutes?) programme of the Sussexes nattering on about royal life.

The mind boggles.

by Anonymousreply 20May 24, 2023 12:59 PM

Is that why she wanted to take all those photos of our place? So she could show what Royal life really looks like?

by Anonymousreply 21May 24, 2023 2:15 PM

For someone who wanted no part of the Royal family ,she's never giving up on trying to catch a ride on their coat tails, is she?

She really is a pain in the ass.

by Anonymousreply 22May 24, 2023 2:41 PM

I’m one of the few people who like them. But enoughs enough. Move on!

by Anonymousreply 23May 24, 2023 3:59 PM

Every time I think I've reached peak disgust...

by Anonymousreply 24May 24, 2023 3:59 PM

Like an ex who can't get over you, even after you've both remarried/repartnered.

Wasn't he supposed to be tapping this "trauma" out of his system? Pathetic.

by Anonymousreply 25May 24, 2023 4:13 PM

Harry lived in the palace didn't he? It didn't say they lived there together. They are very smart. This is when they can rake in the money because all of the haters watch this stuff which just makes them more and more money. In the meantime the reward for the haters is to just have more stuff to spout off about and to be able to call them liars. Win Win for everyone.

by Anonymousreply 26May 24, 2023 4:23 PM

Can they just FUCK OFF already????

by Anonymousreply 27May 24, 2023 4:24 PM

R4 Wrong again.


by Anonymousreply 28May 24, 2023 4:28 PM

Today's report: Harry and Markle Are 'Shocked' by Reaction to NYC Car Chase: 'Absolutely Not Exaggerated'

Suck it, Markles. You lie.

by Anonymousreply 29May 24, 2023 5:32 PM

Their only problem with the monarchy and the Windsor family is that Harry wasn't born before William. Using their royal titles is ridiculous.

by Anonymousreply 30May 25, 2023 12:04 AM

[quote] I know that's the line from the usual Sussex hater types, because they need to believe that "everybody hates them" and "they're going broke" and such, but there's little chance that Harry has run through all his mother's money AND the podcast money AND the book money. In a few years, maybe, but not at this point.

Oh, okay. So they’re just your run of the mill famewhores.

Honestly, I loathe Harry more at this point. What a fucking spoiled whiny man-baby.

by Anonymousreply 31May 25, 2023 12:15 AM

What can there possibly be left to tell? Meghan was miserable, the press didn't like her and having to curtsey to her grandmother in law was hilarious, we know! Harry suffered frostbitten dick, William broke his necklace, and daddy didn't love him enough, WE KNOW! If he carries on at this rate we'll now things as obscure as his thoughts on the wallpaper in the 2nd floor bathroom in the west wing of Clarence House by 2026.

by Anonymousreply 32May 25, 2023 12:26 AM

Keeping my fingers crossed for a The Princess Diaries remake!

by Anonymousreply 33May 25, 2023 12:31 AM

Fuck Netflix. They keep raising the cost of a monthly subscription to underwrite trash like this. And want 8 bucks a month per person if you share your password. Did the fuckers who dole out the money to produce original content read a newspaper or watch the news anytime in the past week?

by Anonymousreply 34May 25, 2023 12:37 AM

I don't subscribe to Netflix, or any other streaming service for that matter.

by Anonymousreply 35May 25, 2023 12:43 AM

SPOILER ALERT: this ends in lamps from IKEA and tears.

by Anonymousreply 36May 25, 2023 1:02 AM

When will they do the Netflix version of Camelot?

by Anonymousreply 37May 25, 2023 1:20 AM

The most desparate two people in hollywood. Uggg ,i am sick of them.

by Anonymousreply 38May 25, 2023 1:56 AM

The more Prince Dim and his wife talk, the more people notice their vapidity. Keep digging, squirrels.

by Anonymousreply 39May 25, 2023 2:23 AM

It'll be a very short film. Markle was in the royal family for 10 minutes.

by Anonymousreply 40May 25, 2023 8:14 AM

Charles was a tampon longer than Meghan was a Royal.

by Anonymousreply 41May 25, 2023 8:36 AM

"I wonder if their strategy is to release BRF-related content for the next few years until their kids are old enough to start making family content..."

It's my theory that Harry has put his foot down about publicizing the kids, as he didn't like growing up in a fishbowl, so that revenue stream may be closed off... as long as they're married.

Seriously, their financial future looks increasingly iffy, they've got nothing to sell except the royal connection, and their lifestyle is VERY expensive. So if they want to keep the money rolling in, they need to get involved in some non-royal drama to keep the public interested. Either move to Botswana and become save-the-elephants warriors, try to go back to royal life for more material, or work up a massive long-running feud with their neighbor Ellen. The last should be easy and convenient.

by Anonymousreply 42May 25, 2023 3:36 PM

It was never on the cards anyway but when the queen said no to the half working royals half Hollywood celebrities lifestyle she really foresaw the future. It'd have led to the Harry and Meghan being double paid by both Netflix and the state to do things like open shopping centres it'd have been ridiculous.

by Anonymousreply 43May 25, 2023 3:53 PM

It’s still ridiculous, R43. The late Queen was prescient.

by Anonymousreply 44May 25, 2023 4:36 PM

Oh good. This again.

by Anonymousreply 45May 25, 2023 4:43 PM

It's Wednesday. Who is Harry suing today?

by Anonymousreply 46May 25, 2023 4:50 PM

DumDum lost one lawsuit, and part of another one, so piled on the invisible car chase, it's been a stellar week.

by Anonymousreply 47May 27, 2023 1:04 PM

r11 There isn't any charity appearance that they do that the media isn't interested in. That is just comple untrue. They release all of this kind of information to the media. All of it- and I don't believe they let the media know they will be at place for a charity function and all the tabloids uniformly said nah not going to cover it not interested which is effectively what you are claiming.

by Anonymousreply 48May 27, 2023 9:27 PM

These two can't fart without it being reported on and they are still thirsty as fuck.

Uvalde, anyone?

It's like watching a train that's sure to crash.

by Anonymousreply 49May 28, 2023 11:46 AM

I would like to know how big an entourage they employ. With Netflix crew, security detail, cooks, maids, chauffeurs, I bet it's more than a regular royal has at his disposal. Social envy set aside, I think it's hilarious that they're fantasizing about private islands on one day and try to play relatable everyday persons the next.

by Anonymousreply 50May 28, 2023 12:01 PM

Now there are divorce rumors but I am not buying it

by Anonymousreply 51May 28, 2023 8:48 PM

I'm totally buying the divorce rumors. I think they've been separated for a while already and will divorce soon. It's been five years of marriage, that's enough. We'll still be "treated" to all the angst, drama, court filings over custody, property, child support, alimony, etc. As well as the interviews, articles, documentaries of their divorce and the inevitable memoirs.

The SouthParkle's cottage industry will carry on.

by Anonymousreply 52May 28, 2023 9:16 PM

Thanks, but I’ll wait for the South Park retelling.

by Anonymousreply 53May 28, 2023 9:34 PM

I think they are encouraging divorce rumors to distract from the embarrassment of their 2 hour sham car chase. But I would think Harry would die before he admitted he chose the wrong wife and Meghan knows her prestige drops when she divorces.

by Anonymousreply 54May 28, 2023 10:26 PM

They backed each other against their own families too hard. Too many "told you so" type comments coming at them if they split. Piers Morgan and all the other people she ghosted will be in seventh heaven. And Bogart, the dog she adopted because Ellen supposedly told her to but who she ditched because he didn't like Harry, what became of him? There's never been any updates.

If Dimbo is spending time at hotels on his own, it's likely to be her idea. He's too ugly, petty and stupid for anyone to tolerate for long. He needs to travel all the way from Montecito to LA to attempt to get his manboobs, double chin and gut in order? Hardly an example of a sustainable lifestyle.

by Anonymousreply 55May 28, 2023 11:07 PM

Compared to them I'm a summer breeze.

by Anonymousreply 56May 29, 2023 2:55 AM

Prince Harry's 'dreams are COLLAPSING' amid legal pressures in the UK | Angela Levin

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 57June 1, 2023 1:44 AM

What does a duchess wear to a deportation?

by Anonymousreply 58June 1, 2023 1:50 AM

Fuck, they’re never going away, are they?

by Anonymousreply 59June 1, 2023 2:11 AM

He won't ever be 'deported'

by Anonymousreply 60June 1, 2023 2:21 AM

A girl can dream, can’t she R60?

by Anonymousreply 61June 1, 2023 2:27 AM

I’m going to assume this story is BS because, well, it’s ludicrous. Nothing about the tweets source comes close to confirming.

by Anonymousreply 62June 1, 2023 2:29 AM

Oh look. More spam generated by a Twitter account singularly dedicated to shitting on the Harkles.

aka Wednesday.

by Anonymousreply 63June 1, 2023 2:33 AM

Apparently after the drug and porn bust at the home Michael Hutchence and Paula Yates shared (where they lived with their baby and her daughters), Hutchence feared not being allowed to tour with INXS in the US if he received a conviction for possessing drugs. Given he'd freely admitted in interviews years before to snorting heroin and taking lots of drugs, as other stars who travelled/travel to the US did/do, it's probably going to take more than just self-admitted drug use for Dimbo to be kicked out.


Even Amy Winehouse was granted a US visa when it was well known that she was an addict.

by Anonymousreply 64June 1, 2023 8:35 AM

R60, no shit you knob

by Anonymousreply 65June 1, 2023 11:19 AM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 66June 1, 2023 11:27 PM

That is pathetic. Now they’re begging people to let them come to their parties?

For three years in the US, they fucked around and I guess now they’ve found out. Hollywood thinks they’re toxic.

Now that the Klan Granny trolls are the only ones who’ll have them, they’re in for a surprise: the $u$$exe$ wouldn’t even think about hanging out with KGTs because there’s nothing in it for them - they’re not important people, can’t get them jobs, and more importantly, they continue to sink the Harkle’s favorability scores by behavior even more idiotic than H&M’s

Too bad, so sad. Maybe Andy Cohen has something for them…

by Anonymousreply 67June 2, 2023 12:11 PM

Two other choices: Sussex Con with the Dumb Squad, and selling shit on the internet.

by Anonymousreply 68June 2, 2023 4:46 PM

What kind of shit, though, R68? It can't be royal.

by Anonymousreply 69June 2, 2023 5:09 PM

I have no idea. An article said Sparkles' blog is shooting for between $15M (Kourtney Kardashian) and $235M (Goop). So stuff nobody really needs.

by Anonymousreply 70June 2, 2023 8:01 PM

She always wears the wrong thing.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 71June 2, 2023 9:53 PM

Stupid story- bulls shit probably about a couple starting to live out a modern version of Edward and Wallis: lives remarkable for nothing more than a connection to the royal family that they have disowned. Not working out any better for them than Wallis and her dumb husband. I have a feeling Harry is just as dumb.

by Anonymousreply 72June 2, 2023 11:01 PM

The Sun.- ROYAL GOOD NEWS. Harry and Meghan to stop making royal-bashing Netflix shows and tell-all books after huge backlash.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 73June 3, 2023 2:53 AM

Princess Kate STUNS in a GOLD ballgown and the Lover's Knot Tiara at Jordan's Royal Wedding:

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 74June 4, 2023 12:15 AM

Being the best-dressed woman in the world, or at least the best-dress internationally famous in the world has got to be a full-time job. With all the long hours of fittings and discussions and hair and makeup and squirming into Spanx involved, I hope she has time to occasionally get a glimpse of the children!

Damn, she looks fabulous.

by Anonymousreply 75June 4, 2023 12:31 AM

Aren't these the two assholes who left the Royal Family because they wanted to live private lives?? Okay, then SHUT THE FUCK UP. Nobody cares about you or anything you have to say.

by Anonymousreply 76June 4, 2023 12:36 AM

Agree that Catherine is running on all cylinders and is at her peak. She does have the luxury of long lead times for most major events, and clever assistants, but damn, she must be a torrid organizer

by Anonymousreply 77June 4, 2023 12:40 AM

Well, something good came from their stans. They've raised $105K for a charity that builds playgrounds in low income areas.

I wonder if Archewell has donated this much collectively over the last year. That would be an awful lot of sandwich trays and Starbucks gift cards. They made it sound like they'd footed the entire cost for the Uvalde playground when the donation was $10K.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 78June 4, 2023 12:42 AM

Archewell should be investigated. Seems like a big grifting tax-exempt slush fund.

by Anonymousreply 79June 4, 2023 1:05 AM

Don't the announcement and pictures suggest it's all Archewell's doing? I searched for where I read about the donation and it was a poster in the Near-catastrophic Part III. Apparently it was only $1000.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 80June 4, 2023 1:39 AM

You bitches are just picking on the Sussex duo. How do you expect Archewell to do more as a charity when Harry and Meggsy only work one hour a week? One hour a week isn't enough to check emails and bully even one staffer.

by Anonymousreply 81June 4, 2023 2:01 AM

I was looking at pictures of the Jordanian royal wedding... and am I the only one who thinks that the bride and groom look like siblings?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 82June 4, 2023 4:57 AM

The groom is cute. Potential cookie smeller?

by Anonymousreply 83June 4, 2023 6:58 AM

Although it’s almost the standard in Western countries these days, the Crown Prince and Princess both seem pretty old traditionally (28 & 29). If Hussein is gay, he might’ve been waiting until he was forced. On the bright side for their forthcoming kids, if you’re rich, there’s probably a much lower risk of issues due to age.

by Anonymousreply 84June 4, 2023 7:49 AM

Do people have a lot of issues getting pregnant at 28 and 29 years old? I thought that was 40-ish when problems with conceiving arose?

by Anonymousreply 85June 4, 2023 8:00 AM

It's old for the region, r85, but they're educated and very pretty. Though from the extremely wealthy class, that girl must be grateful to escape the Saudi Arabian peninsula

by Anonymousreply 86June 4, 2023 8:15 AM

Princess Lilibet turns two today - I wonder if they'll release a new photo?

by Anonymousreply 87June 4, 2023 4:32 PM

Who will play Camilla?

by Anonymousreply 88June 4, 2023 6:30 PM

Sleestak can play any and all of them.

by Anonymousreply 89June 6, 2023 9:57 PM

Given that Netflix is rumoured to be reconsidering airing "Heart of Invictus" and going the way of Spotify in re the Harkles, I doubt it.

The only thing they have to sell is We Hate The Windsors, and they're rapidly running out of road on that one.

Netflix made its money on that revolting "documentary". It should get out whilst the getting's good.

by Anonymousreply 90June 17, 2023 12:17 PM

They're done. Everyone's getting bored of them now that they've spilled the beans. Plus we're aware that they almost never go to the UK anymore so there's no new material or gossip to share. Everything is just going to be a rehash of what they've already said.

Move on, H and Megs. Everyone else has.

by Anonymousreply 91June 17, 2023 12:47 PM
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.


Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!