The Postman Always Rings Twice - 1981
So carrying on my binge of classic noir movies I have just watched The Postman Always Rings Twice with horny Cora played well by Jessica Lange and unwashed Frank played by Jack Nicholson.
While it wasn't a bad setup it also felt plodding, especially the last 40 minutes, and had a few plot holes. How did they explain the first failed attempt on the husband's life? Why was there no reference to the postman? How did Jack get away with matching the blackmailing clerk into a bank at gunpoint?
After the murder all the tension left the movie and it became a melodramatic will they/won't they? complete with an unappealing Angelica Houston showing her tits for no apparent reason.
SPOILER: They also excised the great twist of him being charged and executed for the wrong murder! And what's with the hokey ending shot of Jack wailing and her bloody hand? Plus the unintentionally funny sight of Cora falling out of the car door.
The sex scenes felt unnecessarily gratuitous, Jack using it as an excuse to get a great grope of the beautiful Lange and put his tongue in her box. Was the 40s version any better?
Offsite Linkby Anonymous | reply 75 | October 2, 2023 4:37 AM
|
So sorry I ever went to see this POS.
by Anonymous | reply 1 | May 9, 2023 2:22 AM
|
"The Postman Always Rings Twice" was directed by Nicholson's friend, Bob Rafelson, one of the key players in the New Hollywood movement of American cinema in the 1960s-70s. New Hollywood directors were influenced largely by the French new wave and Italian neorealism, Japanese samurai films, and Ingmar Bergman. Naturally, with its plodding storyline, gratuitous sex scene, and downbeat ending, TPART became a bigger hit in Europe than in the US.
Offsite Linkby Anonymous | reply 2 | May 9, 2023 3:12 AM
|
🕵 [italic] The Postman Always Comes Twice ......
by Anonymous | reply 3 | May 9, 2023 3:16 AM
|
Why did they cut the framing device of Frank being charged for killing Cora? It was clever
by Anonymous | reply 4 | May 9, 2023 7:08 AM
|
I loved it. The slow and atmospheric feel of it - like real life. I'm a huge fan of French and Swedish films - I guess there have been some others - Italian, some kind of eastern European. I got into them in college in Gainesville Florida where they had a theater called the Hippodrome that showed Euro films all the time.
I know it's a goofy theory but I really think if American filmakers had stuck with that, and the serious Godfather and Dog Day Afternoon type themes, somehow the country would be less gullible. The blockbusters, Star Wars, ET, Marvel... all that shit has dumbed us down imo. Films were more sophisticated in the 1940s for god sake.
Oh well, it is what it is, but I hate Spielberg and Howard a LOT.
by Anonymous | reply 5 | May 9, 2023 7:19 AM
|
Oh I meant to say that I think I remember when the "end" happened -- within a couple of years, both Jaws and Star Wars came out. And thus ended adult films. Just dammit. (I'm sure there were a few ok ones after, but the shock-and-awe a minute experience was the new go to. (and the more action, apparently the more tickets sold in China and India because who needs to understand the dialogue when things are flashing and blowing up (or big fish are stalking teenagers)
by Anonymous | reply 6 | May 9, 2023 7:23 AM
|
Did Lana Turner go flying out the car door in the original too?
by Anonymous | reply 9 | May 9, 2023 8:29 AM
|
The 1940s original is far more superior and involving than the 1980s vile porn version, although Jessica Lange was indeed beyond gorgeous.
by Anonymous | reply 10 | May 9, 2023 10:23 AM
|
R11 not at all, I created the similar thread on Double Indemnity
by Anonymous | reply 12 | May 9, 2023 12:02 PM
|
R12 Don’t mind R11; its DLs resident retard.
Lange is exquisite in this.
by Anonymous | reply 13 | May 10, 2023 8:15 PM
|
Stop posting
Include it all in one thread
by Anonymous | reply 14 | May 10, 2023 8:23 PM
|
R14 include all what in one thread exactly? My other thread about Double Indemnity?
If the previous threads on this movie hadn't been closed I wouldn't have needed to create a new one
by Anonymous | reply 16 | May 10, 2023 9:23 PM
|
R9, does that sound like something they would do to Lana Turner? He’ll, no. In the original, the car crashes, and there’s a shot of her lifeless hand as it falls, dropping a tube of lipstick.
by Anonymous | reply 17 | May 10, 2023 10:25 PM
|
Jack Nicholson's stardom is something I will never understand.
by Anonymous | reply 18 | September 25, 2023 8:38 AM
|
Anyone else feel this movie was too long?
by Anonymous | reply 19 | September 25, 2023 8:45 AM
|
The original movie was so much better.
by Anonymous | reply 20 | September 25, 2023 9:17 AM
|
R18 I think he's kind of, uh, interesting. He seems to have something going on between his ears, unlike most actors. He has to, considering he's so ordinary looking.
by Anonymous | reply 21 | September 25, 2023 3:13 PM
|
"He seems to have something going on between his ears,"
Yea, like "how do I sexually assault any woman I come into contact with and avoid prosecution?"
by Anonymous | reply 22 | September 25, 2023 3:20 PM
|
The original with Turner and Garfield is far sexier despite having no crotch shots. Nicholson looks repulsive in this one.
by Anonymous | reply 23 | September 25, 2023 3:30 PM
|
Yeah I get that some might find him attractive but I felt Jessica's character hadn't traded up much from her unattractive husband by allowing Jack to pummel her pussy. A sexier leading man and script that doesn't leave out key details, plus cutting the crap post-murder scenes would have made it much stronger.
by Anonymous | reply 24 | September 25, 2023 4:17 PM
|
R24 It's hard to feel the heat when the leading man looks like a homeless person. Same token, De Niro in New York New York. Not a homeless person but so repulsively written and performed it makes it impossible to buy into the love story.
by Anonymous | reply 26 | September 25, 2023 7:56 PM
|
When I saw it I thought Lang and Nicholson were really fucking.
by Anonymous | reply 27 | September 25, 2023 8:05 PM
|
When Jack was going down on her, I saw pubic hair. I was like, is this real? 😳
by Anonymous | reply 28 | September 25, 2023 8:25 PM
|
This is sweet. From IMDb:
When auditions for this movie were taking place, director Bob Rafelson wrote the name of the actress he thought should be cast as Cora Papadakis and put it inside a sealed envelope. Several months later, Rafelson gave the letter to Jessica Lange, whose name was inside.
by Anonymous | reply 29 | September 25, 2023 8:28 PM
|
I think the postman ringing twice was that Cora died just when Frank thought they would be happy together.
by Anonymous | reply 30 | September 26, 2023 1:59 AM
|
The original was so much better. Lana Turner was no one's idea of a great actress, but she was perfect for this, bullet bra tits and all. Lange was hopelessly miscast.
by Anonymous | reply 31 | September 26, 2023 2:37 AM
|
Lange was not miscast. You can totally see her as a sexually frustrated housewife stuck in a mismatched marriage and driven to murder. The movie sticks closely to James M. Cain's novel and has more of a European sensibility (and with Sven Nykvist behind the camera!), which translates to American audiences as overly long and ponderous. It's only 123 minutes, but there are scenes that seem to go on forever.
by Anonymous | reply 32 | September 26, 2023 3:33 AM
|
Lange was not bad for the part but Nicholson was either miscast or misdirected or both.
And yes R28, you did see public hair.
by Anonymous | reply 33 | September 26, 2023 6:11 PM
|
The editor of this film, Graeme Clifford, would go on to immediately cast Lange in Frances, which he directed. So it worked out well for her.
by Anonymous | reply 34 | September 27, 2023 7:11 PM
|
[quote]I think the postman ringing twice was that Cora died just when Frank thought they would be happy together.
Justice worked after the second try.
by Anonymous | reply 35 | September 27, 2023 7:16 PM
|
Lange was a dead ringer for Frances Farmer.
by Anonymous | reply 36 | September 27, 2023 9:57 PM
|
Lana Turner did not watch the remake, but said she had seen advertisements and blurbs on television that made her sick: she resented how the studio "turned it into such pornographic trash".
by Anonymous | reply 37 | September 28, 2023 4:02 AM
|
Meryl Streep rejected the part of Cora.
by Anonymous | reply 38 | September 28, 2023 4:03 AM
|
R38, that's what Meryl says, but Jessica had been on Jack Nicholson's mind since she auditioned for "Goin' South."
by Anonymous | reply 39 | September 28, 2023 4:09 AM
|
If you want the true ending, read the fucking book. It's great. The Garfield/Turner version is not true to the end of the book but they are so hot together, all is forgiven.
by Anonymous | reply 40 | September 28, 2023 7:42 AM
|
Another thing the old version is superior at is the production design, the costumes and the cinematography. The newer version has that horrible 80's grainy, washed-out brownish look that makes films look like crap. Lana Turner's white costumes in the '42 version are a triumph.
by Anonymous | reply 41 | September 29, 2023 3:10 AM
|
Even though many considered one of Lana Turner’s best performances, I don’t agree. Lana is one of my all time favorite actresses but I’ve seen many better performances from her during that period in her career, like THE BAD AND THE BEAUTIFUL for example.
by Anonymous | reply 43 | September 29, 2023 3:50 AM
|
As I said before, "The Postman Always Rings Twice" (1981) was an A+ tier production, with Bob Rafelson at the helm; Jack Nicholson leading the cast; Ingmar Bergman's cameraman, Sven Nykvist handling the cinematography; screenplay by David Mamet, based on the James M. Cain novel. But it was a critical flop.
Five months after its US release, another neo-noir erotic thriller outperformed and outclassed it-- "Body Heat," which basically came out of no-where with its neophyte or little-known cast and crew.
by Anonymous | reply 44 | September 29, 2023 4:15 PM
|
I watched this recently with my partner, who’d never seen it. He really disliked it, especially the abrupt ending.
One thing I didn’t get was the scene where Jack’s character goes down to LA to visit Angelica Huston playing a gypsy fortune teller or whatever in a carnival. The scene seemed to have nothing to do with the rest of the movie. Am I missing something?
by Anonymous | reply 45 | September 29, 2023 4:52 PM
|
R44, that was the point where the movie seemed to drag on endlessly. The Jessica character leaves town to visit her mother and Jack goes to LA and carries on with Anjelica Huston. There was no point to this exercise other than to give Jack's real life girlfriend a part.
by Anonymous | reply 46 | September 29, 2023 5:18 PM
|
R45, in the 1946 version, Frank spots a woman in a parking lot. She notices; they flirt; and they’re off for a few weeks together. It’s wonderfully casual, and shows that if he wanted to Frank could leave Cora and never look back. But he doesn’t want that; he wants Cora. It’s fate.
by Anonymous | reply 47 | September 29, 2023 5:55 PM
|
R47 I think the movie would have been stronger if the ending wasn't drawn out, the last part felt aimless. Then the damp squib ending of Cora dying without the framing device that Frank is wrongly charged with her murder.
by Anonymous | reply 48 | September 29, 2023 6:08 PM
|
The whole concept of Jessica Lange being attracted to Jack Nicholson, who looks like a homeless person in this movie, is ridiculous.
by Anonymous | reply 50 | September 29, 2023 7:59 PM
|
The sex is revolting actually.
by Anonymous | reply 51 | September 29, 2023 7:59 PM
|
Lana's specialty was non-pornographic trash.
by Anonymous | reply 52 | September 29, 2023 8:00 PM
|
Yeah Jack is actually what spoils it for me. They needed a sexy actor more on Jessica's par
by Anonymous | reply 53 | September 29, 2023 9:08 PM
|
Early 80s Sam Shepard would have been a much better choice.
Offsite Linkby Anonymous | reply 54 | September 29, 2023 10:08 PM
|
Frances didn't have a "Sam Shepard", unfortunately.
by Anonymous | reply 55 | September 29, 2023 10:15 PM
|
R50, her character was stuck in rural California, married to an old fat Greek slob who smacked her ass around and treated her like his prize possession. Any man who came around would've been a catch compared to her husband. This concept worked for me because, like Bonnie Parker in Bonnie & Clyde, she was bored out of her mind in rural America and got a dangerous kick with the new drifter in town.
by Anonymous | reply 56 | September 30, 2023 12:11 AM
|
Shitty movie. Don’t waste your time.
by Anonymous | reply 57 | September 30, 2023 12:16 AM
|
I hardly remember anything about the Turner Garfield version, but the 1981 Nicholson Lange version used to play on cable a lot when I was a teen in the early 80s. It’s not a shitty movie, but you have to enjoy these actors and their films I think, and it’s worth at least one viewing. After the husband is killed it goes off the rails a bit, and I found it convoluted, when it didn’t have to be that way. If anything, you get to see Lange blossom into this great actress, and the next year she cleaned up with Frances Tootsie and her Oscar win.
by Anonymous | reply 58 | September 30, 2023 12:40 AM
|
[quote]Lana's specialty was non-pornographic trash.
And that's why some of us love Lana, because of glorious trash like "Imitation of Life" and "Madame X."
by Anonymous | reply 59 | September 30, 2023 8:01 AM
|
R41, disagree, I thought it had excellent period atmosphere, the costumes and cinematography (by legend Sven Nykvist) were great. Lana's white costume was striking but didn't suit her character at all - she's supposed to be working-class, not a glamourpuss
by Anonymous | reply 60 | September 30, 2023 8:10 AM
|
R60 the working class can still be glamourous on a budget!
by Anonymous | reply 61 | September 30, 2023 9:15 AM
|
R60, the two films are shot in different genres. The 1946 Postman is a film noir. It's not meant to be "realistic." Lana's Cora IS a bombshell, not just some dame in a restaurant; she's meant to seem impossibly desirable, deceptively sincere and untouchable. The noir style is perfect for the dark, intense novel. It's not a story about people struggling in the 1930s, it's about obsession and death. The 1981 film is a beautifully crafted period drama, but it doesn't suit the material.
by Anonymous | reply 62 | September 30, 2023 9:47 AM
|
It was brave of Frank to give Cora's knickers such a deep sniffing. I doubt penny-pincher Nick stretched to a drum washer..
by Anonymous | reply 63 | September 30, 2023 3:43 PM
|
Well I just finished the 1946 version and found it much more enjoyable than the 1981 update. Clearer in plot, less meandering, fantastic noir qualities and no yucky shagging.
by Anonymous | reply 64 | September 30, 2023 7:22 PM
|
Even better: No yucky Jack Nicholson.
by Anonymous | reply 65 | September 30, 2023 7:28 PM
|
According to Cherly Crane Lana Turner didn't think Garfield was attractive.
by Anonymous | reply 66 | October 1, 2023 5:06 AM
|
Sorry that opinion came from Lana's friend Evie Wynn Johnson.
by Anonymous | reply 67 | October 1, 2023 5:09 AM
|
Her usual makeup man Del Amstrong was drafted so Lana did her own makeup for the film.
by Anonymous | reply 68 | October 1, 2023 5:10 AM
|
The ending of the remake is hokey nonsense complete with Jessica spinning out of the door and Frank pretending to care
by Anonymous | reply 69 | October 1, 2023 10:30 AM
|
R66: She ultimately had an affair with Garfield so she got over that first impression. Certainly, on screen, he exuded sex.
by Anonymous | reply 70 | October 1, 2023 1:32 PM
|
The 1981 version is not "classic film noir."
It is derivative neo-noir that veers from the noir code exemplified by the Lana Turner and John Garfield "Postman" of 1946.
by Anonymous | reply 71 | October 1, 2023 1:53 PM
|
Cameron Mitchell was originally cast with Lana in Postman. He was under contract to the studio at the time (MGM) and was an unknown up-and-comer, but then Garfield became available. The following year he played a smallish supporting role in Cass Timberlane (starring Lana and Spencer Tracy). He didn't really make it until he was in Death Of A Salesman on Broadway.
by Anonymous | reply 72 | October 1, 2023 4:28 PM
|
Cameron Mitchell was just as sexy or even sexier than Garfield. He would have been a good choice for Frank but Garfield was the better actor.
by Anonymous | reply 73 | October 1, 2023 4:55 PM
|
Garfield also just had more weight as an actor, and more star quality. Mitchell was closer in age to Lana by a few years, and they were supposed to be young lovers (in the book), but then Garfield was only in his early 30s.
by Anonymous | reply 74 | October 1, 2023 5:19 PM
|
I’m a John Garfield fan. Thought he was a great actor and there was a rough trade sexiness to him. Shame he died young and not long after his career got going.
by Anonymous | reply 75 | October 2, 2023 4:37 AM
|