Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Sussexes ‘took photographer into Buckingham Palace without late Queen’s permission’

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex have been accused of taking a private photographer into Buckingham Palace without permission during their farewell tour in Britain, after a behind-the-scenes image was broadcast to millions in their new Netflix trailer.

The one-minute-long advert for the Duke and Duchess’s new documentary shows a series of black-and-white photographs, taken at their Frogmore Cottage, their wedding evening reception, and on holidays.

One picture appears to have been taken inside Buckingham Palace, showing them walking out of the garden entrance.

By convention, anyone wishing to film or shoot in the Queen’s home requires permission, with “strict protocol” surrounding imagery in what is considered private quarters.

The Telegraph understands that the presence of the photograph was the subject of a written palace complaint at the time, as aides noted that the couple had not asked permission to shoot inside the Queen’s home.

The Sussexes are not thought to have been made personally aware of the warning.

“It’s fair to say there was surprise to see there was a photographer,” said one source, adding: “In usual circumstances, you need permission to take pictures in that area.”

A second said: “There is very strict protocol about bringing a film crew or photographer. Usually a memo would be sent to the Queen to get approval.”

The photographer was not asked to leave, The Telegraph has confirmed.

One insider said the appearance of a private photographer had been noticed by household staff at the time, as the Sussexes came and went from the palace.

They had travelled to Britain in March 2020 for what became known as their “farewell tour”, including a string of public engagements from a secondary school to the Commonwealth Day Service.

While here, they were followed by photographer Chris Allerton, whose work shooting the Duchess during a private visit to the National Theatre and at an emotional farewell to staff at Buckingham Palace was released and published soon afterwards.

In it, Prince Harry and Meghan walk hand-in-hand towards an exit of Buckingham Palace, where two footmen hold the doors open for them.

The Duchess is wearing a winter coat and distinctive heels, carrying a small handbag that appears identical to an outfit she wore to a Goring Hotel farewell lunch for staff that week.

One source described the presence of an unauthorised photographer as a “genuine violation” of the Queen’s household, saying he was spotted by so many that news “wouldn’t have taken long for it to go round the building”.

They predicted that there could be more images to come in the documentary or printed elsewhere, with the Sussexes also holding events in the the Belgian Suite and 1844 Room, and the offices of staff.

The picture was one of at least a dozen behind-the-scenes shots to be aired in the Netflix trailer.

Others include images of Prince Harry and Meghan kissing in their Frogmore Cottage kitchen during the same week, and what appeared to be the Duchess crying during a phone call with her head in her hand.

“It is certainly stretching the definition of privacy,” said one critic after the trailer was released.

“For a couple who have been privacy-obsessed, in 60 seconds they have shown raw emotion, private places, photos never before seen.

“They’ve blown their own protestations out of the water and detonated their own privacy policy.”

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s lawyer has previously insisted that their challenge of “unlawful violations of privacy” is different from sharing their lives on their own terms.

“[It] doesn’t mean, just because you assert your human rights, that you then become some kind of Trappist monk and take a vow of silence, you’re not allowed to discuss anything,” Jenny Afia said in 2021.

“That’s not how privacy works. Privacy is about the right to own and control what personal information you choose to share with somebody.”

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 25December 5, 2022 12:14 AM

She is such an asshole.

So is he.

by Anonymousreply 1December 2, 2022 9:10 PM

So fucking what. Charles brought a horse into his bedroom at the palace

by Anonymousreply 2December 2, 2022 9:12 PM

^^ irrational Mega-stan.

by Anonymousreply 3December 2, 2022 9:25 PM

[quote] So fucking what. Charles brought a horse into his bedroom at the palace

Did the horse fuck him?

by Anonymousreply 4December 2, 2022 9:31 PM

I wonder if Meghan'll include her photo op in Uvalde where she wanted to take a photographer with her into the school to get some close-ups of blood and guts.

by Anonymousreply 5December 2, 2022 9:34 PM

Can you please post a separate thread.on their toilet schedule considering you think we need to know everything about them? TIA!

by Anonymousreply 6December 2, 2022 9:34 PM

^^ this is from their self-promoting Netflix series because SO MUCH IS AT STAKE.

They won't go away.

by Anonymousreply 7December 2, 2022 9:41 PM

Tacky tacky tacky

by Anonymousreply 8December 2, 2022 9:44 PM

Calling their daughter Lilibet is the tackiest thing they've done. Named her after the very woman they badgered for tiaras, a nicer house, titles etc.

by Anonymousreply 9December 2, 2022 9:47 PM

Oh. Who gives a fuck?

by Anonymousreply 10December 2, 2022 9:50 PM

R10 since you've decided to post in this thread, you do.

by Anonymousreply 11December 2, 2022 10:01 PM

sMEGstans are so fat, stupid and gullible. I'm not sure if they can function as human being. SAD.

by Anonymousreply 12December 2, 2022 10:13 PM

@r4, "Did the horse fuck him? "

No, he married her 🙄

by Anonymousreply 13December 2, 2022 10:32 PM

What I find reprehensible about the Harkles is that Harry literally spent his ENTIRE life in that world. He know all the rules backwards and forwards. There is no confusion or misunderstanding involved, but a wilfull and calculated disrespect and entitlement.

He knew what he was doing and simply decided he didn't care.

by Anonymousreply 14December 2, 2022 10:35 PM

R13 and now she's Queen.

Seethe, Meghun. :-*

by Anonymousreply 15December 2, 2022 10:41 PM

I want to see those two greed-merchant phonies starring in the worst positions in a vérité enactment of "Inhuman Centipede: The Circle of Wrath."

by Anonymousreply 16December 2, 2022 10:49 PM

These two are disgusting, I look forward to their very public undoing...and you know they'll plead for privacy.

by Anonymousreply 17December 2, 2022 11:04 PM

So, while they were going on and on about protecting their own "privacy", they invaded the Queen's privacy in her own house.

Nice.

Scumbags.

by Anonymousreply 18December 2, 2022 11:26 PM

I think it's just that there's something not quite right about Harry. Did he fall onto the floor on his head when he was born, or something?! Or his mom's death, and just the age at which he occurred, really fucked him up? Otherwise I don't understand how he would've decided to upend his life the way he did after marrying Megs, unless the reasons had to do with psychological damage or rebellion.

by Anonymousreply 19December 3, 2022 12:51 AM

They are despicable cunts, and I hope they will never set foot inside any palaces in the UK ever again.

by Anonymousreply 20December 3, 2022 12:59 AM

[quote] They are despicable cunts, and I hope they will never set foot inside any palaces in the UK ever again.

Well, now.

The big, fat NOBODY at R20 has spoken!

Close the gates!!!

R20 has spoken!!!

Bwahahahahaha

by Anonymousreply 21December 3, 2022 1:09 AM

Royalty by its nature is a grift but these two really excel at it. Pair of brats. I hope Charles disowns them.

by Anonymousreply 22December 3, 2022 1:20 AM

I fear the Duke and Duchess of Overseas have shot their wad.

by Anonymousreply 23December 3, 2022 11:37 PM

They want privacy, so they say, but trash everyone else's.

by Anonymousreply 24December 4, 2022 12:11 AM

Cunts

by Anonymousreply 25December 5, 2022 12:14 AM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!