Breaking: Supreme Court rejects Trump’s request to keep tax returns from the House

So when do we actually see them.

Boy, can that clown drag shit out or what?!

Republicans are gonna be in charge of the House in a month. They're not going to do anything with this.

Yes they are, r3.

They will use this to get Biden’s tax return.

R4, are you serious? You do know Biden already released his returns, right?

^ Um, we've already seen Biden's tax returns 🙄

For R4:

So, Trump is a lying motherfucker, we know this; he's also a treasonous, attempted murderous motherfucker as well. The Republican party doesn't seem to care.

Somehow whoever the "THEY" in real power is (it's not the American people) let him get away with this. So I won't hold my breath on his tax return.

Hunter Biden’s

You are the meanest person ever R8.

Well, at least this gives someone time to leak them to the world.

It would be a shame if we found how tiny it really was!

[quote]So when do we actually see them.

"We" do not see them.

The House Ways and Means Committee sees them.

Enough of our rolling over for these elected miscreants and their appointees, it's high time for a tax revolt on April 15, 2023.

No taxation without representation!

We may not get to see them, but the info they provide will leak eventually and the world will see what a fraud and con artist Trump is.

I'll bet his asshole is puckered right now.

I don't pay taxes. That doesn't make me a criminal - that makes me smart.

I'm shocked Clarence MAGA Thomas didn't throw some last minute fuckery.

What with all the pressure on Thomas and his slag wife, and the recent revelations about Thomas' cohort on the bench, I imagine he and the rest of the right wing judges are being extra careful about what they rule against right now.

Actually, any justices inclined to dissent were probably like, hmm, enjoying the Thanksgiving holiday or writing a dissent for that asshole. I do have clerks, but... Fuck it, it's cranberry and stuffing time!

Didn’t the NYT already write extensively on copies of the tax returns? Not sure how this relates to January 6 committee.

They wrote about the returns in 2020

[quote]We may not get to see them, but the info they provide will leak eventually and the world will see what a fraud and con artist Trump is.

Yeah, this'll be the end of him!

Engoron is fed the fuck up with Trump delays.

I have heard some talk that the Jan 6 committee may move over to the Senate. Not sure how that works.

Can the new “Animal House Majority” (barely), suppress these returns from the public?

Is trump shitting in his pants (again), or is he clicking his heels awaiting his boot-licking maga congress to take over on January 3 and do more of his dirty work?

One set of laws for the wealthy and one for the rabble. This is what a big part of the French Revolution was about equality under the law. The royals were going around raping and pillaging while the average person was being raped and pillaged. Sound familiar?

I don't know, the "new" Republican congress is shifting their loyalty to DeSantis, they might not get in the way of any Trump investigation

....

Barr has had sufficient.

If Trump outs Penjce, and a couple of other Republicans, I'd be fine with that.

@r29, Now, a warning? 🙄

That asshole help create the monster who is Trump

the enemy of my enemy is my friend

I hate Bill “No Barr” Too Low. All he’s done is tried to distance himself from TFG in the hopes that he will not also be indicted, what a fucking joke this country is now!!!! And Barr will get away with it, that’s what is so maddening!

^ take a Klonopin, hun

Color me surprised that they Supreme Court ruled this way since we know Clarence sides with him on principle and 3 others owe him their jobs.

I actually just got high, as you can see, nothing works for me anymore. Sorry, sincerely.

Trying desperately to distract from Hunter Biden's laptop and the investigation that is coming for them.

^ Found the Fox News junky 🙄

Morbidly obese.

Nah. They're too liberal now.

^ Found the Newsmax junky!

R35

I am wondering whether after their Roe decision, the others aren't a bit concerned about overturning anything political they don't like?

R37 R40

Hah r43 I wouldn’t have even notice I have that troll blocked.

[quote]I am wondering whether after their Roe decision, the others aren't a bit concerned about overturning anything political they don't like?

I am no opposed to overturning Supreme Court precedent - I mean, Dred Scott.

What I'm opposed to is the lack of compelling legal argument behind overturning Roe, as well as many other precedents that are built on the same underlying argument as Roe.

It's the willy nilly disregard for law and willingness to make a completely political decision that should trouble everyone.

The USSC is done with Trump, largely because all his legal arguments are bogus. He’s losing every case he puts in front of them but it’s because his arguments are so bogus and weak.

When he’s in stripes I’ll buy Dl a round of bubbly. Except you trump lovers you can drink my piss.

^^^^^^^^^^

And mine. Cheers MAGGOTS!

I guess SCOTUS got their marching papers from the RNC powers that be.

C'MOOOOOON PETTY REVENGE

I can’t recall the Supreme Court ever giving Trump a good decision. It’s a delay tactic for him but it’s also the end of the line for him. Correct me if I am wrong but they never have ruled for him.

They better hand over the tax returns before January...before McCarthy and repubs take over. Always at the last moment...

[quote] The House Ways and Means Committee sees them.

They will 'leak' and then we can let the Republican-led house holding hearings about how they leaked and we'll be like "probably the Repuublicans leaked them so they could have these pointless hearings."

I believe Roberts had to call him out for trashing the Court like he did political opponents at one point?