Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Jennifer Aniston says ‘there are no more movie stars’ and that she ‘hates social media

Yep.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 43November 20, 2022 5:05 PM

She ain’t dumb.

by Anonymousreply 1November 10, 2022 4:53 AM

Wow, Jen that's so interes... 😴💤

by Anonymousreply 2November 10, 2022 5:07 AM

Actors and actresses (such as Bette Davis) saw themselves above "film stars" such as Joan Crawford.

Film stars saw themselves as better than mere television actors..

Now mostly television actors (using that term quite loosely) are lamenting vanishing number of "film stars".

by Anonymousreply 3November 10, 2022 5:11 AM

A Low, Jennifer... Cute TV show, I think I was on it once 🤔

by Anonymousreply 4November 10, 2022 5:16 AM

No mystieque!

by Anonymousreply 5November 10, 2022 5:18 AM

Isn’t she a TV actress?

by Anonymousreply 6November 10, 2022 5:19 AM

R2 = Angelina.

by Anonymousreply 7November 10, 2022 5:22 AM

^ No, it's me. I guess after 30 years I'm just over the whole Jennifer Anniston thing

by Anonymousreply 8November 10, 2022 5:26 AM

She’s not wrong though. What do we have now, Florence Pugh and Timothee?

Do you want them starring in a remake of “Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf”?

by Anonymousreply 9November 10, 2022 5:27 AM

@r5, "No mystieque! "

Well, I feel sarry for her... Tap, tap, tap, tap, tap, tap, tap...

by Anonymousreply 10November 10, 2022 5:29 AM

Bad as Ms Aniston seems to believe things are, it is only going to get worse.

Just as motion pictures changed acting landscape dominated for ages by live theatre, television did same to films. Thanks to advances in modern technology we now have a whole new world of streaming and other digital media giving rise to yet another outlet for "actors".

There is only but so much legitimate talent to go around. Rest will be jumped up models, those whose best work was on casting couches and others with very little to offer in terms of legitimate acting talent.

by Anonymousreply 11November 10, 2022 5:30 AM

It must be excruciating for her to watch people like the Kardashians have more following and more influence, and a lot richer than her, what they made in a month by posting nothing but stupid selfies on IG is more than her, an A list actress in a year! 😤🤥😒

by Anonymousreply 12November 10, 2022 5:37 AM

So when people say that exact thing on here it’s ok but…?

by Anonymousreply 13November 10, 2022 5:40 AM

"there are no more movie stars"

Certainly not in your house, dear

by Anonymousreply 14November 10, 2022 5:43 AM

^ You tell her, M 😠

by Anonymousreply 15November 10, 2022 5:44 AM

She isn't just a TV actress. She crossed over, "made it" in films. Back when it was hard to.

by Anonymousreply 16November 10, 2022 5:47 AM

Ha! I had him first... Right next to where I keep my Oscar 😏

by Anonymousreply 17November 10, 2022 5:55 AM

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII had him first!

by Anonymousreply 18November 10, 2022 5:56 AM

Well, maybe ONE. Garbo.

by Anonymousreply 19November 10, 2022 5:58 AM

r11

nepobabies fill kids media,

nepo parents having knowledge of the biz are more aggressive on contracts than typical stage parent

untrained kid (which the bulk remain despite claims they've grown up in the industry, so they were exposed) ends up with a major picture deal at a young age that extends into their twenties.. . regardless of what happens in this kid's future or how they feel about it. so, they're on the hook, the studio is on the hook and nobody wins. Rarely are there any true breakouts.

so many directors now (also untrained) getting massive deals based on former celebrity and tends to select former celebrities or those in circles, where casting and associated staff are only formalities (corporate is in it's own zone and can't imagine if a kid is hot today, how they could be cold tommorrow. the nepo crowd are high on their own farts and the rest of the industry is split into various factions but mostly have other side hustles they've given up fighting any of this shit.)

basically, people that appeared in hot product, even if they're shit now, have a higher chance of securing a gig. . . because of that public awareness factor, even if they're utter shit.

Aniston we all know is such a nepobaby that could always fall back on daddy if it didn't work out because she never really had any skills or interests to begin with. She has grown as actress but it's taken her decades, and it's the equivalent of a bag girl become a cashier on her level of growth. It gave her power to move from star to commercial which is really where she made the bulk of her earnings as a celebrity spokesperson and influencer than as a star.

while talent those doors are more narrow than before, if they stay in the industry, they go through what opens. so, they're lucky to have one big break but most still fall into obscurity because they don't have the sociopolitical backing with either legacy or the in-crowd of the moment.. so the security lot lizard that is the third cousin, twice removed of major star has a better chance of securing a gig than the rising nobody.

which everyone knows, in all sectors of the industry in every part of the world (more of a serious issue in smaller nations with competition for public funds and loans for anything from gaming to animation to major film) but have been stuck sitting on their thumbs for the last twenty or so years... kind of like trying to get term limits in congress except the guilds are a joke and there's no way to enforce limits on what is just the culture, the social norms. The people upset the most are the people that can't catch a break and when they do they're happy to play by these norms. Go figure.

by Anonymousreply 20November 10, 2022 6:17 AM

tl;dr r20

by Anonymousreply 21November 10, 2022 6:24 AM

It's R20, The Nepotism Baby Troll. Always starts or pops up in celebrity threads. A really obsessive sick individual. One of DL's worst.

by Anonymousreply 22November 10, 2022 6:31 AM

R20 apparently likes writing posts that make the Doomsday Book look like a raffle ticket.

by Anonymousreply 23November 10, 2022 6:33 AM

r21 that's fine, addess your complaints to dl staff and call to reduce replies to a twelve character maximum.

r22 yes, now people are sick of nepobabies but that's more the 1% how you dare you criticize nyc crowd with tiktoks about how hard it is to live on only 13k a month. .. hollywood nepotism allows one to be trailer trash yet still manage to book gig after gig and become a dynasty family simply because they haven't told anyone where the bodies are buried yet.

r23 I prefer to think of it as the last burnout before psychotropics and psychedelics became commercialized. . . writings which mean nothing now but will be granted visionary status upon my death all because I once had a shit in the same loo as Tom Cruise and the nda doesn't allow me to tell you about the gloryhole.

by Anonymousreply 24November 10, 2022 6:42 AM

^ Geez, you are a chatty one, aren't you? 🙄

by Anonymousreply 25November 10, 2022 6:44 AM

Wow, insanity in a nutshell.

by Anonymousreply 26November 10, 2022 6:45 AM

Night nurse must be late doing her medication rounds again.

by Anonymousreply 27November 10, 2022 6:49 AM

r28 And now she's posing like Kim Kartrashian in this photoshoot.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 28November 10, 2022 7:07 AM

The fuck she do to her face?!

by Anonymousreply 29November 10, 2022 7:14 AM

Yes, we know troll. You've posted the same pic 5 times.

by Anonymousreply 30November 10, 2022 7:16 AM

The irony is that I feel like Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie were really the last big "movie stars". Though Aniston has had a very successful crossover acting career, I wouldn't call her a movie star. I am surprised she hasn't leaned into some disposable thriller series on Netflix like "The Watcher" and cash in a nice pay day. She looked good up until about 50 but she's hit a wall. I've heard she is athletic but a very heavy smoker.

by Anonymousreply 31November 10, 2022 7:24 AM

She can say anything she want with her eyes.

by Anonymousreply 32November 10, 2022 7:26 AM

Thi is the same Aniston who just posed naked for a magazin for no reason ?

by Anonymousreply 33November 10, 2022 7:55 AM

r31 your post is laughable.

She was in a small little tentpole show for Apple TV's called "The Morning Show". Every heard of it? She is paid $2 million per episodes, there have been 20 episodes and a S3 coming out. She's cashed the fuck in and is making more than most actors or actresses because AppleTV was desperate the get a big names for this show.

Funny enough, cheaper "Ted Lasso" has a much bigger impact but Jennifer and Reece will not be denied their money.

by Anonymousreply 34November 10, 2022 7:55 AM

Jesus Christ you are insane. Have you plotted Jen's death by hammer?

by Anonymousreply 35November 10, 2022 8:24 AM

There are movie stars, they’re just a bit shit these days. Struggle to think of more than a couple I actually like. She’s absolutely right back social media. It’s a cancer on humanity.

by Anonymousreply 36November 10, 2022 9:20 AM

[quote] She’s not wrong though. What do we have now, Florence Pugh and Timothee?

People online are using the two of them to refute Aniston’s claims. I’m sorry, but they’re not stars.

by Anonymousreply 37November 10, 2022 9:33 AM

She looks like she had her upper eyelids done. She’s right hollywood is dead and now we have reality trash.

by Anonymousreply 38November 10, 2022 9:35 AM

How would Aniston know anything about being a movie star. She never was one.

by Anonymousreply 39November 10, 2022 10:43 AM

r28 what happened to her breasts, so flat and sad looking.

Jen has always had Kim-K style photo shoots. She used her body to get ahead.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 40November 20, 2022 4:10 PM

I see the future with CGI "actors". Real actors will still do theater. I was watching some show that relies heavily on CGI and you couldn't tell the cgi from real actors. Pores, stubble and other imperfections were all there.

by Anonymousreply 41November 20, 2022 4:15 PM

It’s hard for her that is a secondary star to Kim Kardashian or Zendaya. But old fruit always gets tossed into the trash.

by Anonymousreply 42November 20, 2022 4:15 PM

Jen is right. On both points. I couldn't agree more.

by Anonymousreply 43November 20, 2022 5:05 PM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!