Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Prince William Slaps Camilla In The Face

Prince William especially has made it clear that the newly-appointed Queen Consort will never fill the role of his late mother, Princess Diana.

In her new book, Camilla: From Outcast to Queen Consort, Levin revealed that the Prince of Wales was very direct when it came to his children’s relationship with Camilla. “William has made it clear that Camilla is the wife of his father, but not a step-grandmother to his children,” the royal author said, adding that William and Kate Middleton’s three children know they have “two grandfathers but only one grandmother."

Talk about a slap in the face

by Anonymousreply 382January 10, 2023 2:16 AM

Slap her Willona!

by Anonymousreply 1October 7, 2022 9:50 PM
Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 2October 7, 2022 9:52 PM

At last people are speaking out.

by Anonymousreply 3October 7, 2022 10:06 PM

Damn, it's been a long time since there was something about William that made me like him a bit. Nice of him to remember who how vile this woman was to him and his brother, by acting like a common whore, and his mother.

by Anonymousreply 4October 7, 2022 10:16 PM

I still like Camilla more than most members of that family.

by Anonymousreply 5October 7, 2022 10:50 PM

I don’t like Camilla, but feel the displeasure heaped on her is simply a way to avoid criticizing Daddy Deadbeat Charles.

She’s now the country’s whipping boy/horse.

by Anonymousreply 6October 7, 2022 11:58 PM

She's a whore, darlin'.

by Anonymousreply 7October 8, 2022 2:23 AM

It is hilarious when one thinks of what the previous generations of Royals of the British Empire have done.

by Anonymousreply 8October 8, 2022 2:28 AM

William is as dumb as his brother….Her Majesty is his children’s step-grandmother. He might not want her to have anything to do with them but she still is their step-grandmother as long as she is married to His Majesty Charles III

by Anonymousreply 9October 8, 2022 2:31 AM

I was hoping this thread title was literal!

William seems like a good father. He’s wise to keep the cunt who gaslighted his mother at a distance.

by Anonymousreply 10October 8, 2022 2:37 AM

[quote]R8 It is hilarious when one thinks of what the previous generations of Royals of the British Empire have done.

But there was deniability in earlier cases. The public wasn’t privy to palace secrets back then, pre investigative reporting, recording devices, and social media. The dirt on rulers remained rumors, not facts… like the known fact that Charles wants to be Camilla’s tampon.

by Anonymousreply 11October 8, 2022 2:43 AM

What an idiotic article. We have seen lots of pictures of all three Wales children interacting very affectionately with Camilla

by Anonymousreply 12October 8, 2022 2:44 AM

Those kids probably see the Middletons a lot. The Middletons are young (compared to C&C). I can understand not wanting to treat Camilla like a grandma or step-grandma.

I don't know how people can stand having step-parents, frankly. Kudos to those who did a good job at raising a child not his/her own. But you mostly hear bad stories.

AFAIC, if my parents divorced and my dad got remarried, I'd call her "my dad's wife."

by Anonymousreply 13October 8, 2022 2:45 AM

Camilla is grandpa's 'beard'. That is a galpal who helps hide a gay man's sexuality.

by Anonymousreply 14October 8, 2022 2:54 AM

Poor Camilla, always the second horse in the race, never the winner. But I give you this she sure knows how to trot in front of her subjects.

by Anonymousreply 15October 8, 2022 3:13 AM

They are obviously playing nice with each other . The long game again.

by Anonymousreply 16October 8, 2022 3:33 AM

Can't blame William, really. The truth of how they gas lighted Diana, is probably much worse than what the public knows.

by Anonymousreply 17October 8, 2022 3:38 AM

She's still their queen.

They all must bow or curtsy to her--literally. Every time they see her.

by Anonymousreply 18October 8, 2022 3:41 AM

Filthy bootlickers. #JustSayNo

by Anonymousreply 19October 8, 2022 3:43 AM

The worse part is Camella team gaslighting worked, on the general public of the UK and now they all think she's just a tough old down to earth broad. I guess the quiet rebrading of her image paid off. But she's nothing of the sort. Prince William knows the real Camella.

by Anonymousreply 20October 8, 2022 3:43 AM

I love Camilla. She is one of the smartest members of that family and has no fucks to give. She played the long game and won.

by Anonymousreply 21October 8, 2022 3:44 AM

Doubtful that Camilla cares. She has her own children and grandchildren

by Anonymousreply 22October 8, 2022 3:44 AM

And horses that fuck her.

by Anonymousreply 23October 8, 2022 3:45 AM

Wills needs to get over it.

Camilla has been exceedingly graceful and dignified since she married Charles. Which can not be said for many other members of that family.

by Anonymousreply 24October 8, 2022 3:46 AM

That old mare is a wild one. Best stand back, you never know when she's going to kick.

by Anonymousreply 25October 8, 2022 3:47 AM

Will doesn't need to get over shit. IT WAS HIS MOTHER. You dont "get over it" to please some horse faced gold digger going after your father. Grief is a life long process. He's entitled to feel the way he wants for the rest of his life. She can get over it. And so can her boot licking worshipers.

by Anonymousreply 26October 8, 2022 3:50 AM

Harry was smart to get out and avoid all the drama.

Without Harry as the whipping boy, the "fab four" can tear each other apart!

by Anonymousreply 27October 8, 2022 3:54 AM

The Dianafraus are a bitter bunch.

by Anonymousreply 28October 8, 2022 3:54 AM

Camilla didn't play any "long game". Charles spent millions on publicists to improve her image, and his. How embarrassing to always be known as the Tampon Queen.

by Anonymousreply 29October 8, 2022 4:09 AM

R24 Get over what? His children are seen interacting with Camilla in a positive way. The children just don’t call her “grandmother.” She isn’t their grandmother. You don’t like facts?

by Anonymousreply 30October 8, 2022 4:12 AM

I still dont get what Charles saw in her. He could have had any woman in the country and he went for the horse? Woman probably throwing themselves at him all the time when he was younger. Camella was an ugly Frau even then.

by Anonymousreply 31October 8, 2022 4:12 AM

The Diana loons need to get real. Camilla is Queen.

by Anonymousreply 32October 8, 2022 4:13 AM

Queen Consort. Barely.

by Anonymousreply 33October 8, 2022 4:14 AM

[quote] The Diana loons need to get real. Camilla is Queen.

So William is a "Dianaloon?"

Because he started this.

by Anonymousreply 34October 8, 2022 4:15 AM

[quote] One thing Prince Harry and Prince William have in common these days? They have to bow to their step-mother, Queen Consort Camilla. And they're not alone. Sources tell Page Six that everyone in the royal family will be expected to bow to Camilla.

[quote]“The personal impact is likely the protocol changes that roll into action almost immediately," the source says. “The family will now have to bow or curtsy to King Charles and Queen [Consort] Camilla.”

[quote] Meanwhile, Majesty managing editor Joe Little tells the outlet, “It would be the protocol to bow to the new king and Queen. Whether that happened under such circumstances [on Thursday or Friday morning] is debatable, but any time the royal family meets the new king and queen, the done thing would be to bow or curtsy to them.”

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 35October 8, 2022 4:20 AM

Disgusting.

by Anonymousreply 36October 8, 2022 4:24 AM

ENOUGH BRF THREADS!

by Anonymousreply 37October 8, 2022 4:26 AM

Camilla did anal on the first date. I guess that's what passes as Queen these days.

by Anonymousreply 38October 8, 2022 4:27 AM

Fuck that, I would not bow to my father's whore.

by Anonymousreply 39October 8, 2022 4:29 AM

Ewww R38, just picturing that I threw up in my mouth.🤮🤮🤮

by Anonymousreply 40October 8, 2022 4:30 AM

r36, either you believe in the entire system of royalty or you do not. This is not like Cathpolic doctrine where you can pick and choose.

if there is a king (and there is), his wife is the queen. Protocol demands the Prince and Princess of Wales must bow & curtsy to the queen every time they are invited into her presence. So William and Kate must bow & curtsy to Camilla.

If they didn't, they would then be announcing their own titles were meaningless.

by Anonymousreply 41October 8, 2022 4:30 AM

Kick her in the cunt bone, Wills!

by Anonymousreply 42October 8, 2022 4:33 AM

R40, sorry but I'll bet she wipes back to front as well.

by Anonymousreply 43October 8, 2022 4:34 AM

Again I say fuck that. Protocol is just something people made up over time. It's subject to change like anything else. Just lime man world leaders do not bow to the king.

by Anonymousreply 44October 8, 2022 4:35 AM

[quote]If they didn't, they would then be announcing their own titles were meaningless.

That does not make sense at all. First of all, Catholics are NOT entitled to pick and chose. Yet they all do it but it's technically against catholic doctrine. That does not mean they are less religious because they are breaking with some tradition. The Monarchy is the same way, it's just tradition. If the priced didn't bow to the queen, he would still be the Prince. That's the bottom line. The Monarchy would not be destroyed over such silly traditions.

by Anonymousreply 45October 8, 2022 4:38 AM

Boo Hoo Hoo!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 46October 8, 2022 4:39 AM

Wow, the Klan Grannies are short circuiting.

They're so used to hating Meghan that now they have no idea who to support, if Meghan's not the villain.

by Anonymousreply 47October 8, 2022 4:41 AM

Camilla the Queen of Consorting

by Anonymousreply 48October 8, 2022 4:54 AM

R46 is just jealous because no one will be shedding a tear or shock like that for Camilla when it's her turn to be shipped off to the glue factory.

by Anonymousreply 49October 8, 2022 4:59 AM

Camilla cheapens the monarchy. Perhaps irretrievably.

by Anonymousreply 50October 8, 2022 5:01 AM

All the bowing nonsense is lame. William should start a new protocol. When Camilla enters a room he should stand at attention, draw his right leg back and kick her right in the cuntbone while his children stomp on her gnarly toes 🙂

by Anonymousreply 51October 8, 2022 5:03 AM

O well, if Amanda Levin said then it must be true. You Camilla haters really need to get a freaking life. You're pathetic.

by Anonymousreply 52October 8, 2022 5:04 AM

^ Ooh, tell us all about your wonderful life. Go on, make me jealous

by Anonymousreply 53October 8, 2022 5:06 AM

Camilla is the new Meghan.

by Anonymousreply 54October 8, 2022 5:20 AM

^ Nope, Camilla is actually the very old and tired Meghan

by Anonymousreply 55October 8, 2022 5:24 AM

I was going to say, Camillia wishes she was Meghan. Youth and Hollywood style looks are something that are in very short supply in that royal relationship.

by Anonymousreply 56October 8, 2022 5:27 AM

Camilla was passed around more than a cheap box of sale chocolates at Marks and Spencer. Hard pass on her.

by Anonymousreply 57October 8, 2022 5:28 AM

I meant in the sense Camilla is the new royal figure everyone gets to dump on. With Meghan in the U.S., the People and the press need a new punching bag.

And boy does Camilla look punched! She’s awful.

by Anonymousreply 58October 8, 2022 5:31 AM

Isn't this about the 3rd or 4th time she's been up for most hated in the last 40 years or so?

by Anonymousreply 59October 8, 2022 5:35 AM

Markle has neither youth nor Hollywood-style looks.

by Anonymousreply 60October 8, 2022 5:36 AM

Yeah, the PR campaign that she and Charles have been on for 20 years is going to fall by the waist side now that they are both going to be in the spotlight. But deserving so as they will both yield a lot of power. Even if she does not have official power, her influence of Charles is intoxicating as her tampon to him.

by Anonymousreply 61October 8, 2022 5:37 AM

I find it hilarious that every article I've read says Queen Consort Camilla. Charles said when they married, she wouldn't be titled queen- and was a liar. He bullied his mother until she finally broke down.

Biggest scandal since Wallis was unfairly denied the HRH. That had legal precident.

by Anonymousreply 62October 8, 2022 5:38 AM

When William becomes King (which will hopefully be very soon) he can have Camilla locked away in a room in some castle.

by Anonymousreply 63October 8, 2022 5:39 AM

[quote]Markle has neither youth nor Hollywood-style looks.

Oh Camella, sorry I took the limelight away from you. Sorry you never got the attention you wanted when you were my age, I would have thought an old grizzled broad such as yourself would be above that by now. You got the family jewels, bot literally and figurative, what else do you want greedy bitch?

by Anonymousreply 64October 8, 2022 5:41 AM

[Quote]Queen Consort. Barely.

R33, sweetie, the wife of a king is always "queen consort." That's the job title, and the queen consort is called "Queen Name." Anyone with any intelligence (not you) knows she is not a queen regnant as was Queen Elizabeth II.

by Anonymousreply 65October 8, 2022 5:41 AM

If William becomes King and she's still alive, will she have to bow to him instead?

by Anonymousreply 66October 8, 2022 5:42 AM

‘Fall by the waist side’?

AH, HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!

by Anonymousreply 67October 8, 2022 5:42 AM

R64 Did you suddenly stop your medication? Are you waiting for Medicaid authorization?

by Anonymousreply 68October 8, 2022 5:44 AM

Precident?

Camella?

AH, HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!

by Anonymousreply 69October 8, 2022 5:45 AM

R65, thanks doll. I'm quite aware. I've never heard QETQM referred to as Queen Consort. She was always just Queen Elizabeth. And the reason I said barely, is because Charles himself said Camilla would not be queen when they married. A lie, as we see now.

by Anonymousreply 70October 8, 2022 6:11 AM

Camilla is a whore!

by Anonymousreply 71October 8, 2022 7:22 AM

Let William and Charles fight it out.

With all of this fuckery going on with the BRF after the death of QE2, the monarchy doesn't have much time left.

by Anonymousreply 72October 8, 2022 3:20 PM

^ Camilla is the "Queen" of whores... You may bow down and kiss her skanky ass 😉

by Anonymousreply 73October 8, 2022 3:44 PM

Camila the chicken.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 74October 8, 2022 4:37 PM

I like Camilla because she knew Harry's wedding would be a boring mess so she avoided it in a very ballsy way . "I have prior engagements."

by Anonymousreply 75October 8, 2022 4:41 PM

Fake. Camilla and William get along fine. You frauen get that these stories are made up to sell to gullible idiots like you?

by Anonymousreply 76October 8, 2022 4:41 PM

It’s hysterical that King Tampon claims to serve the People, yet lied to them about never making his whore a queen.

by Anonymousreply 77October 8, 2022 4:44 PM

[quote] I like Camilla because she knew Harry's wedding would be a boring mess so she avoided it in a very ballsy way . "I have prior engagements."

I doubt this is the scenario. I think she didn't feel welcome, to the extreme. Otherwise, she would have attended, as Charles' wife.

by Anonymousreply 78October 8, 2022 4:48 PM

@r76, " Camilla and William get along fine"

Why? Camilla contributed to the destruction of both his parent's marriage and his mother. Why would he even give daddy's skank the time of day. William seems like a pretentious snot, so he might as well practice on Camilla

by Anonymousreply 79October 8, 2022 4:49 PM

It's unfortunate for Camilla that "whore" and "horse" sound so similar.

by Anonymousreply 80October 8, 2022 4:50 PM

Yeah, she was probably privately disinvited.

As for Will saying she isn't grandmother to his kids, that could kdcas easily be seen as a polite clarification rather than an insult.

by Anonymousreply 81October 8, 2022 4:51 PM

Camilla was at Harry’s wedding . She and Catherine were exchanging knowing stares while that cartoonish Reverend was yapping away.

by Anonymousreply 82October 8, 2022 5:13 PM

[quote]r82 Camilla was at Harry’s wedding . She and Catherine were exchanging knowing stares while that cartoonish Reverend was yapping away.

Might white of ‘em, too.

by Anonymousreply 83October 8, 2022 5:33 PM

You're right, R82, Camilla was at the wedding.

by Anonymousreply 84October 8, 2022 5:34 PM

[Quote]Markle has neither youth nor Hollywood-style looks.

Well, she's younger than Camilla and not old and she was an actress in Hwood.

Care for a saucer of milk, fat jealous cow?

by Anonymousreply 85October 8, 2022 6:01 PM

^ 😂 👍

by Anonymousreply 86October 8, 2022 6:16 PM

R85, Camilla has spent her life being rich and doing what and whom she liked, and now she's Queen of Great Britain and the Commonwealth. She's rich beyond the dreams of avarice, has a marriage that works, is largely beloved, and gets to spend her spare time playing in the royal jewel vault.

She isn't jealous of Meg, it's the other way around.

by Anonymousreply 87October 8, 2022 6:53 PM

The knowing stares...

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 88October 8, 2022 6:58 PM

Meg is ugly: she needs skin treatment for her large pores and uneven surface as well as her orange coloring. She’s playing in Trump territory.

And her figure. Oof. Don’t get us started.

Her fashion sense is appalling.

The fact that she was some attractive, well-known figure prior to her leech attachment to the BRF is just more of her publicity gaslighting.

“[bold] She’s repugnant”.

by Anonymousreply 89October 8, 2022 7:01 PM

@r87 Is Megs in the room with us now? Did you check under the bed? 😳

by Anonymousreply 90October 8, 2022 7:16 PM

Silly equivalent, but if a queen has "ladies in waiting", what is the king's equivalent?

"Gentlemen of the bedchamber" or "Groom of the Stool"?

by Anonymousreply 91October 8, 2022 7:18 PM

I don't think Meg's fashion sense is bad. But I can't get around the shitty personality.

by Anonymousreply 92October 8, 2022 7:18 PM

Who wore it better? 😂

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 93October 8, 2022 7:20 PM

Like you've got room to talk on THAT front, Meghan!

Seriously, fuck off. You've got a useless husband to support.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 94October 8, 2022 7:23 PM

We can do this all day!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 95October 8, 2022 7:24 PM

Diana always wore if better, of course, even if the colors are fucking hideous.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 96October 8, 2022 7:25 PM

"This old hag may have beat my mother-in-law, but she is no match for "straight out of Compton"

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 97October 8, 2022 7:25 PM

Seriously, where's that big-ass photo collage that someone made, of Meg copying dozens of Diana's outfits?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 98October 8, 2022 7:28 PM

Eazy-Tea is a cunt.

by Anonymousreply 99October 8, 2022 7:28 PM

"That's right, Camilla, I like Harry's little black girl better than you, so suck it, horse face"

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 100October 8, 2022 7:30 PM

Some of those Diana / Meghan outfits don’t even look that similar except for the color. EG, the red outfits look different.

by Anonymousreply 101October 8, 2022 7:36 PM

Camilla posing with one of her natural children...

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 102October 8, 2022 7:38 PM

OP, I ought to smack YOU. I clicked expected to see a picture of William actually hitting Charles' wife but you meant a figurative slap in the face.

by Anonymousreply 103October 8, 2022 7:41 PM

Here's Camilla with her brother before he fell and killed himself in a drunken stupor

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 104October 8, 2022 7:43 PM

"I'm crying because this old skank wreaks of booze and cigarettes"

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 105October 8, 2022 7:46 PM

[quote] Megz, Posting from her $16 million mansion....

....that looks like a dated Olive Garden restaurant and has 16 bathrooms with outdated plumbing. That Harry is supposed to fix.

Yuck.

by Anonymousreply 106October 8, 2022 7:49 PM

"Quick, someone hand me a bucket of water. There's only one way to deal with Camilla"

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 107October 8, 2022 7:59 PM

Queen Camilla, scaring the horses wherever she goes...

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 108October 8, 2022 8:07 PM

Suck it up, Camilla haters. She's WON. She's the wife of King Charles III. She's the Queen Consort. She is, despite the hysterical attempts to prove otherwise, well liked in the Royal family. And by the Meghan isn't good enough to smell her shit. So keep on bleating about how terrible she if that makes life more exciting for you. But fact is that she has WON. And she feels just fine.

by Anonymousreply 109October 9, 2022 12:21 AM

Is the Camilla Hate Troll the same as the Joanne Woodward is a Homewrecker Troll??

by Anonymousreply 110October 9, 2022 12:31 AM

Regardless of William's sour feelings because of Diana, treating Camilla as his father's wife, and not his mother or his children's grandmother seems completely fair to me.

I had two stepmothers thanks to my father marrying early and often, and I always hated the expectation that I was supposed to pretend they were my mother. Best case, I might consider them friends and confidantes. Worst case, I'd view them as semi-authority figures, at least for as long as I was underage. But they were never my mother, and they were barely family.

I think many step-parent/child relationships would be less fraught and more positive if everyone involved understood and respected the actual relationship (of an authority figure with the bioparents making the important decisions) rather than trying to force a parent/child role. There would probably be less hostility between the step-parent and other bioparent if that were the expectation.

by Anonymousreply 111October 9, 2022 1:08 AM

Another DL troll crafts a headline that has nowt to do with the truth and never did.

Camilla never tried or intended to try to play stepmother to Charles' kids or step-grandmother to William's kids. She was far too savvy for that and had a horde of grandchildren of her own.

If you read down the article you'll see what Levin's book says about Camilla's relationship with William and his children. There's no slap. There IS NO SLAP. It's all cool and all good.

There was no slap, everyone understood everyone else, and no one felt William's feelings were anything but understandable.

I fail to see why the Daily Mail gets censored here, but DLers who act like the Daily Mail don't.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 112October 9, 2022 1:14 AM

And, besides, Grannie Cammie protected me from that harridan my Uncle Harry married.

So don't badmouth her.

by Anonymousreply 113October 9, 2022 1:34 AM

Camillia has her own grandkids, right? So what does she care?

by Anonymousreply 114October 9, 2022 1:46 AM

What is the parliamentary procedure to strip her title of Queen Consort? Is the entire country stuck with calling her that?

by Anonymousreply 115October 9, 2022 2:59 AM

[quote]Prince William Slaps Camilla In The Face

He slapped her so hard...she slipped her bridle and bolted for the barn!

by Anonymousreply 116October 9, 2022 3:13 AM

@r115, Parliament usually just uses a sugar cube and carrot stick to get rid of unwanted nags

by Anonymousreply 117October 9, 2022 3:15 AM

[quote] What is the parliamentary procedure to strip her title of Queen Consort?

Why do you ask? Do you think that's going to happen? You Camilla haters are truly cuckoo.

by Anonymousreply 118October 9, 2022 3:33 AM

William actually did an interview with this author about his relationship with Camilla? Doubt it. If he did, then he shouldn't have a problem with the book from Harry coming out next year.

by Anonymousreply 119October 9, 2022 3:54 AM

She didn't win shit, not even at Ascot 🐎🐎🐎

by Anonymousreply 120October 9, 2022 3:57 AM

^ I do believe she won the look alike contest with the winner

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 121October 9, 2022 4:09 AM

"Oh, hello, Camilla, you're looking well today"

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 122October 9, 2022 4:14 AM

If Camilla was aware of the stuff said about her on the I-Hate-Camilla threads on Datalounge she'd laugh her ass off, especially at the male horse jokes.

by Anonymousreply 123October 9, 2022 4:44 AM

Question for the obsessive haters of Queen Camilla on this and other threads: you’re largely American, why do you care?

by Anonymousreply 124October 9, 2022 4:55 AM

"If Camilla was aware of the stuff said about her on the I-Hate-Camilla threads on Datalounge she'd laugh her ass off"

Yeah, but it would be one of those smoker's coughy laughs where she's about to hack up a lung and you end up thinking the bitch is going to drop dead right in front of you. Then what do you do? Awkward 😳

by Anonymousreply 125October 9, 2022 5:07 AM

[quote] Yeah, but it would be one of those smoker's coughy laughs where she's about to hack up a lung and you end up thinking the bitch is going to drop dead right in front of you. Then what do you do? Awkward

I guess you're trying to funny. But you're not, you poor, sad thing.

by Anonymousreply 126October 9, 2022 5:29 AM

^ You're a British Frau, born without a sense of humor or opposing thumbs

by Anonymousreply 127October 9, 2022 5:39 AM

^ But, they've got tits that hang down to their knees

by Anonymousreply 128October 9, 2022 5:42 AM

[quote]Suck it up, Camilla haters. She's WON.

She was in the news yesterday for wearing a velour onesie, so clearly you and I have different definitions of "winning."

by Anonymousreply 129October 9, 2022 6:22 AM

The irony in all this is that thanks to Meghan's and Harry's stupidity, William these days has a.much better relationship with his father and stepmother than ever before. And a far better one than he now has with his brother and sister-in-law.

Nice try, OP.

These days, the Waleses.and the King and Queen are a inited front in defence of the Crown and against a common enemy.

Harry couldn't have done more to pull them together if he'd set out to do so.

OP, like her idols, is incapable of reading a room and still thinks it's 1997.

by Anonymousreply 130October 9, 2022 11:51 AM

Camilla doesn't seem the type to care about being any sort of grandmother figure to his brats. She got what she wanted.

by Anonymousreply 131October 9, 2022 12:17 PM

Interesting that she has her pile where she lives & Chaz. has his. It's not like their respective pads are tiny & they'd be bumping into each other left, right & center...If it is 'The Love of the Century', how come they don't live together?

by Anonymousreply 132October 9, 2022 1:12 PM

ENOUGH

by Anonymousreply 133October 9, 2022 1:57 PM

[quote]R132 If it is 'The Love of the Century,’ how come they don't live together?

Because someone who has servants follow him bearing his own personal toilet seat needs a lot of space… plus she would probably throw herself from the nearest parapet if she had to put up with his bullshit 24/7.

by Anonymousreply 134October 9, 2022 4:30 PM

From everything I've read, Camilla is pretty much a nice woman. William relates to her as the nice woman who married his father, and his children relate to her as the nice woman who married their grandpa.

It's not entirely clear how Harry relates to her. He once famously praised her to the press for making his father happy, but there are rumors that he resents her as the woman who famously made his mother unhappy.

by Anonymousreply 135October 9, 2022 5:09 PM

“Made his mother unhappy”?

Understatement of the year.

by Anonymousreply 136October 9, 2022 5:58 PM

Can Hazy just let poor Diana Rest In Peace? She had so little in her short life. Some of her own making. some from life giving her some real shots.

All this shite as they drag her out of her grave. Ghouls, the 2 of them. How pathetic to build your image on death porn. Looking at you Meghan & your cosplay of Diana..Yuck & yuck!

by Anonymousreply 137October 9, 2022 6:26 PM

[quote] She was in the news yesterday for wearing a velour onesie, so clearly you and I have different definitions of "winning."

I'm sure it concerns Camilla not at all that she was "in the news" for "wearing a velour onesie." She's married to the man she loves. She's Queen consort. She has everything she wants. She won.

by Anonymousreply 138October 9, 2022 7:47 PM

[bold]#ForNow

by Anonymousreply 139October 9, 2022 8:55 PM

R138 i know, really?!

Camilla won the whole shooting match. The man, the crown, the wealth, the jewels. She'll be left a rich woman if he dies first, and if he doesn't, she'll live the way very few humans on this planet can imagine.

This thread is absurd. Camilla has never ever tried to supplant Diana with her sons or grandchildren.

She's managed a quite decent relationship with William, and as his children have no living memory of Diana, there isn't a problem there. They have the Middletons as blood grandparents, two Aunts and an Uncle with the Middletons, and three young cousins. That's not including their other cousins on their father's side.

Another thread based on hot air.

The only thing real tragedy is the isolated Sussex kids, who will never know this kind of extended family comfort.

by Anonymousreply 140October 9, 2022 9:23 PM

No he didn’t- nice try OP.

by Anonymousreply 141October 9, 2022 9:34 PM

He dug a pair of spurs in her haunches.

by Anonymousreply 142October 9, 2022 10:10 PM

It's very cute that the Cambridge kids appear to be close to their second cousins, particularly the Phillips and Tindall daughters. George at one point had a raging crush on his imperious-looking cousin Savannah, who is reported to have taken great pleasure in bossing him around.

In Victoria's day, of course, she would have expected them to marry.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 143October 9, 2022 10:41 PM

Hush, Georgie.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 144October 9, 2022 10:43 PM

[quote]R140 Camilla won the whole shooting match. The man, the crown, the wealth, the jewels. She'll be left a rich woman if he dies first, and if he doesn't, she'll live the way very few humans on this planet can imagine.

Personally, it’s hard fir me to imagine someone enjoying life [italic]when they look like a dog, [/italic] but if she’s actually happy, I guess Camilla proves it can be done (?)

by Anonymousreply 145October 10, 2022 12:16 AM

Which shows how little you know, R145. But I’m sure that being a “former model” has equipped you to deal with these existential issues on a much more profound level than the rest of us.

by Anonymousreply 146October 10, 2022 12:49 AM

BUMP

by Anonymousreply 147October 10, 2022 2:35 AM

Wow, the HORSEMILLA CUNT eaters are out in force on this thread starting with R9. The hideous creature is already 75, so hopefully will get some disease like cancer and croak soon. Her cunt eating worshippers also deserve a long and painful death!

by Anonymousreply 148October 10, 2022 2:50 AM

Orderlies, please attend to r148, and bring a straitjacket. That is all.

by Anonymousreply 149October 10, 2022 2:51 AM

Queen Consort, lol. She's an ugly whore. Can't change that.

by Anonymousreply 150October 10, 2022 3:03 AM

R70, Charles could not have declared that.

by Anonymousreply 151October 10, 2022 3:05 AM

Sassy little George had a crush on a girl? Or did he just wanna play with her Barbies

by Anonymousreply 152October 10, 2022 3:07 AM

[quote]I like Camilla because she knew Harry's wedding would be a boring mess so she avoided it in a very ballsy way . "I have prior engagements."

That's called rude an tacky. She brings the Monarchy down with stunts like that. She's no better than what she thinks of the same people she publicly snubbed.

by Anonymousreply 153October 10, 2022 3:27 AM

Camilla was there- she was saddled up in pink for the occasion.

by Anonymousreply 154October 10, 2022 3:30 AM

[quote]R146 I’m sure that being a “former model” has equipped you to deal with these existential issues on a much more profound level than the rest of us, r145

You know, the thing I should give Camilla a break about is I keep forgetting that by Brit standards, she’s about an 8.

[quote]Does “former model” = “current whore”?

[italic]Goddamn you![/italic] It was Former Model, now Former Whore!

by Anonymousreply 155October 10, 2022 3:31 AM

R155 don’t assume that everybody who disagrees with you is British. It’s a very American thing to do.

by Anonymousreply 156October 10, 2022 3:38 AM

[quote] That's called rude an tacky. She brings the Monarchy down with stunts like that. She's no better than what she thinks of the same people she publicly snubbed.

Relinquish the strangling grip on your pearls, Mary. If you had bothered to read the rest of the thread, you'd have seen that that claim she begged off Harry's wedding is false. She absolutely WAS at Harry's wedding, and there are photos upthread of her presence there.

by Anonymousreply 157October 10, 2022 3:46 AM

[quote] Meg is ugly: she needs skin treatment for her large pores and uneven surface as well as her orange coloring. She’s playing in Trump territory. And her figure. Oof. Don’t get us started.

As opposed to Camilla with saggy jowls, dry winkled skin like crepe paper, body of a suburban house Frau and frumpy fashion style knock offs of much younger women's style. Oh, but Meg's skin pores? Really?

by Anonymousreply 158October 10, 2022 3:48 AM

[quote] As opposed to Camilla with saggy jowls, dry winkled skin like crepe paper, body of a suburban house Frau and frumpy fashion style knock offs of much younger women's style. Oh, but Meg's skin pores? Really?

Oh fuck off, you crazy cunt. Suck it up! Camilla is Queen. Nothing you can do to change that.

by Anonymousreply 159October 10, 2022 3:52 AM

Why is Camilla Queen Consort, but Philip was only Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh and never King Consort? Seems like a double standard.

by Anonymousreply 160October 10, 2022 3:53 AM

My Mom thought her name was Carmela Bowels.

by Anonymousreply 161October 10, 2022 3:54 AM

[quote]Camilla won the whole shooting match. The man, the crown, the wealth, the jewels.

And a complementary horse wreath.

by Anonymousreply 162October 10, 2022 3:54 AM

Go on. Argue all you want about this. We'll get over it.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 163October 10, 2022 3:56 AM

Camilla Parker Bowles Syndrome = When your stomach turns just at the sight of her.

by Anonymousreply 164October 10, 2022 3:57 AM

Oh no. Anyway more Gin please footman. Actually just leave the bottle.

by Anonymousreply 165October 10, 2022 4:07 AM

Camilla never had any intention of taking Diana's place.

The only thing she ever really wanted was Charles.

by Anonymousreply 166October 10, 2022 4:31 AM

Charles and Camilla have both been seen comfortably spending time with each others grandchildren.

by Anonymousreply 167October 10, 2022 4:33 AM

[quote]Camilla never had any intention of taking Diana's place. The only thing she ever really wanted was Charles.

Which is exactly the same thing the wives of Henry VIII said.

by Anonymousreply 168October 10, 2022 4:36 AM

R168 pretty sure only the first two (at max) wanted Henry.

by Anonymousreply 169October 10, 2022 4:38 AM

Now that she's rich, can someone buy the whore decent foundation garments? Charles is lucky he can suck her nipples and eat her pussy at the same time, but the rest of us don't want to see that!

by Anonymousreply 170October 10, 2022 4:48 AM

Oh, come on. Only wanted Charles. There’s a lot of swag that comes along w/Charles. She might appear jolly about her role, but she must’ve wanted it.

by Anonymousreply 171October 10, 2022 4:50 AM

Do you think even as we type, r171, she's down in the bowels of the palace draping herself with all the former Queen's jewels?

"This tiara is now mine! And this necklace is now mine! It's all MINE!"

by Anonymousreply 172October 10, 2022 4:56 AM

YOU FUCK OFF, R159!! Your obsession with an old shriveled up CUNT only shows that your must be as hideous as she is!!

by Anonymousreply 173October 10, 2022 5:07 AM

r63 Been there, done that.

-Eleanor of Aquitaine

by Anonymousreply 174October 10, 2022 6:01 AM

[quote]r170 Charles is lucky he can suck her nipples and eat her pussy at the same time, but the rest of us don't want to see that!

THANK YOU, Valerie!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 175October 10, 2022 6:27 AM

Diana has been dead for 25 years - some of you might consider letting go.

And if your best contribution to the subject is randomly throwing around the word “cunt”, then we can all see that you’re barking mad as well as having lost the argument.

by Anonymousreply 176October 10, 2022 6:46 AM

There’s no statute of limitations on being an accessory to MURDER, r176

by Anonymousreply 177October 10, 2022 7:25 AM

As I said, barking mad, R177.

by Anonymousreply 178October 10, 2022 9:29 AM

This thread is Exhibit A on how DL has been invaded by humorless scolds who have changed the whole board for the worse. I made one snarky comment about Camilla wearing velour, and it was not only taken seriously, but I was angrily informed that Camilla has "won." Won what, I don't know, but I'm assuming it's some lame "won at life" frau thing.

by Anonymousreply 179October 10, 2022 9:49 AM

[quote] Why is Camilla Queen Consort, but Philip was only Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh and never King Consort?

Because the title 'King' is held on a higher level than the title 'Queen', even if the reigning Monarch is the Queen. Just another old out of date sexist Royal tradition.

by Anonymousreply 180October 10, 2022 9:59 AM

I’d love it if some member of the public flung some tampons at Charles during a walk about…with the string flying free like a party streamer

by Anonymousreply 181October 10, 2022 10:18 AM

[quote]Diana has been dead for 25 years - some of you might consider letting go.

Yes, get over your mother dying a tragic death while you are still a young child. How dare you hold on to that for 25 years. Its not like she was the most important person in your life and get birth to you. Move on, kiss the new queens ass and never mention your mom's name again. - Camilla Loons.

by Anonymousreply 182October 10, 2022 12:11 PM

If Princess Diana was alive today she would still be younger and better looking than Camilla by more than 15 year. I bet Camilla would still be trying to rip off her look. Horse of another color.

by Anonymousreply 183October 10, 2022 12:13 PM

[quote]Camilla won the whole shooting match. The man, the crown, the wealth, the jewels. She'll be left a rich woman if he dies first, and if he doesn't, she'll live the way very few humans on this planet can imagine.

Wow, this comment reveals the psyche of the brf slags. I notice they use "won" often as if daily life should be a competition to gain riches and jewels. Not just be happy and comfortable and live your best life but grasping and "winning".

Very Trumpian. No wonder they are all seem to be homophobic, conservative cunts.

by Anonymousreply 184October 10, 2022 12:36 PM

If Diana were still alive I picture her having the mature elegance of her good friend Liz Tilberis.

by Anonymousreply 185October 10, 2022 12:38 PM

Actually the "conservative cunts" are the tut-tutting Granny fraus who hiss "whore!" and wail on about "their mother died a tragic death while they were still young children" (the new "WON'T SOMEBODY THINK OF THE CHILDREN?!")

And as one can see above, the about of vitriol they spew demonstrates they are quite unhinged.

by Anonymousreply 186October 10, 2022 12:49 PM

A (UK) Queen as monarch will never have a husband titled "King."

Just as in a deck of playing cards, a King will always rank higher than a Queen. And what Queen would put not only herself but her nation's rule under a non-blood royal?

It is why Queen Elizabeth I never married; back then her husband would have been given the title "King," and thus given rule over England....and her.

But DL's humorous imaginary machinations of Princess Charlotte notwithstanding, it is unlikely the UK will see a reigning Queen again this century.

by Anonymousreply 187October 10, 2022 3:27 PM

R182 Hi Harry / Meghan McCain / Kanye

by Anonymousreply 188October 10, 2022 7:17 PM

I don't care for Meg- love Harry, but I doubt they have any interest in DL.

by Anonymousreply 189October 10, 2022 7:24 PM

R182, some of us do have events that we'll never get over, events that, for good or ill, made us who we are.

But by Harry's age, we've learned that nobody is interested in hearing us whine about those events.

by Anonymousreply 190October 10, 2022 10:00 PM

[quote]r190 By Harry's age, we've learned that nobody is interested in hearing us whine about those events.

So why does Diana’s death still get so much press, decades after her death?

You’re an idiot.

by Anonymousreply 191October 10, 2022 10:09 PM

Harry is far from the only person in the world who lost a beloved parent at a young age.

by Anonymousreply 192October 10, 2022 10:20 PM

Diana's death is one thing, R191, hearing Harry whine about it is another. Are YOU interested in hearing a grown man with kids of his own whine about losing his mother?

Of course not! Nobody is, outside of men's support groups, and even there everyone is far more interested in talking about their own tragedies than listening.

by Anonymousreply 193October 10, 2022 10:24 PM

Do they let klan grannies into men’s support groups, r193? How would you know what’s welcome or discussed there?

by Anonymousreply 194October 10, 2022 11:46 PM

[quote] Your obsession with an old shriveled up CUNT only shows that your must be as hideous as she is!!

Eat shit, you pathetic troll. Your obsession with a very rich, contented woman only shows that you are a very sad cunt with a lot of time on your hands.

by Anonymousreply 195October 11, 2022 12:37 AM

Honey, no matter how rich that hag has a face like a dog's ass.

by Anonymousreply 196October 11, 2022 3:02 AM

[quote] Honey, no matter how rich that hag has a face like a dog's ass.

Sweetie, get a freaking life. You have my pity.

by Anonymousreply 197October 11, 2022 3:16 AM

I need a life, while you are stalking this thread?

by Anonymousreply 198October 11, 2022 3:19 AM

I think we all agree that if Camilla goes quietly, the monarchy can remain.

If she will not, well…

by Anonymousreply 199October 11, 2022 3:52 AM

LOL! R195, You deserve to have that creatures cane shoved up your ass, coming out of your gutter filled mouth!

by Anonymousreply 200October 11, 2022 4:39 AM

Let us handle this. We KNOW people.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 201October 11, 2022 5:34 AM

There isn’t a big difference between monarchies and organized crime. Both groups gained power and riches through the enforced bloodshed of others.

by Anonymousreply 202October 11, 2022 6:03 AM

That photo of those two at R201 is creepy as hell. No one should dress children that age up like they're adults. They look like two 40 year old dwarves. There is appropriate formal attire for children that age. William's kids will grow up hating him and Kate for stealing their childhood from them. And sadly they'll grow into adults just as incompetent at raising kids as the rest of the Royal Family is. They lost the only one who knew how to raise a child when Diana died. Harry has his mother's sensibilities, and William has his father's.

by Anonymousreply 203October 11, 2022 12:01 PM

She may have the title but she'll never be thought of as Queen. She'll always be a grizzled interloper, unattractive even by English standards. It's a emperor's new horse blanket type of situation

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 204October 11, 2022 12:56 PM

R203, they were at their grandmother’s funeral—a grandmother who was the sovereign. Not sure how you expected them to dress.

by Anonymousreply 205October 11, 2022 1:00 PM

[quote]he'll never be thought of as Queen. She'll always be a grizzled interloper, unattractive even by English standards.

Is that even possible?

by Anonymousreply 206October 11, 2022 1:20 PM

[quote]Diana's death is one thing, [R191], hearing Harry whine about it is another. Are YOU interested in hearing a grown man with kids

You sound like a real Cunt. Men have feelings and I think any man who speaks lovingly of his mother is a gift, ESPECIALLY in front of his kids. You apparently embrace the toxic masculinity model and want men to be cold and detached so they can commit more crimes in society trying to fill that emptiness.

by Anonymousreply 207October 11, 2022 1:25 PM

This whole family is creepy as hell. The only thing creepier is the weirdos who worship them, bowing and scraping for "their Majesties" on a frigging Datalounge thread. ENOUGH.

by Anonymousreply 208October 11, 2022 2:15 PM

Yet here you are, r208.

As for how the kids are dressed, not everyone raises American slobs who don’t know what an iron is, and have never seen shoe polish.

by Anonymousreply 209October 11, 2022 2:31 PM

Royalists aren't dataloungers, they're conservative interlopers who come here to troll.

by Anonymousreply 210October 11, 2022 2:48 PM

I disagree r210. It’s true a lot of fraus started reading DL thanks to the Dangling Tendrils threads. However, this site always had great information on royal families, historical knowledge, knowledge on RF jewelry, etc., predating MM by years. Those were interesting threads.

by Anonymousreply 211October 11, 2022 2:59 PM

[quote]William's kids will grow up hating him and Kate for stealing their childhood from them.

Well, what should they do? Take them to Thorpe Park or something? Ha ha ha ha ha!

by Anonymousreply 212October 11, 2022 3:04 PM

Camilla;s biggest crime is that she is a blowsy, plain older woman who doesn't care about glamour or fashion.

If she were a stylish, beautiful, elegant older woman like Carmen Dell'Orefice, the anti-Camilla sentiment would have been minuscule from the start - she would have become the most popular member of the Royal family, And those posters who rage against her as "Horsey" or a "homewrecking cunt" would be SWOONING with delight at the thought of her becoming Queen Consort. And for all her qualities, Diana would be pretty much forgotten.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 213October 11, 2022 3:11 PM

Besides Diana, was anyone in the family stylish? Princess Michael is all I can think of.

by Anonymousreply 214October 11, 2022 3:55 PM

[quote]is just jealous because no one will be shedding a tear or shock like that for Camilla when it's her turn to be shipped off to the glue factory.

The British are very stupid. They'll do as their told, they'll cry when she dies and they'll line up to see her and say nice things about her.

For 3 decades, she was the most famous whore in the world

by Anonymousreply 215October 11, 2022 4:20 PM

[quote]Camilla;s biggest crime is that she is a blowsy, plain older woman who doesn't care about glamour or fashion.

You're kidding right? She's done nothing for the past twenty five years or so than care about fashion and how she looks. She had plastic surgery and it still takes ten people to make her appear presentable.

She was hideous until Charles spent millions on her. And even with all that money spent on her, she still looks terrible

And this old cunt used to make fun of Diana for caring about her appearance

by Anonymousreply 216October 11, 2022 4:24 PM

[quote]As for how the kids are dressed, not everyone raises American slobs who don’t know what an iron is, and have never seen shoe polish.

R208 said nothing about how the kids were dressed. Although they don't dress them well. The two eldest look like chavy trash. The youngest is okay, but he has his own problems

by Anonymousreply 217October 11, 2022 4:29 PM

[quote]Eat shit, you pathetic troll. Your obsession with a very rich, contented woman only shows that you are a very sad cunt with a lot of time on your hands.

She's so content that she has to live apart from her husband. She's so content that she has to have a full staff to make her half way presentable. She's so content that she has to have her ex-husband around all the time. She's so content she's had to hide her hideous children from the public. She's so content that she had to banish all her current husband's best friends. He has no friends now. Just rich hangers on. She's so content that she has no friends. She's so content that she'll spend her last days being a mother to a petulant, man baby

by Anonymousreply 218October 11, 2022 4:37 PM

[quote] Not sure how you expected them to dress.

Age appropriately. Not dressed up like they're about to attend a board meeting. I thought I made it crystal clear.

by Anonymousreply 219October 11, 2022 4:49 PM

Diana is clearly the patron saint of mentally-ill women. The stars aligned in her case (beautiful young outsider versus Camilla: unapologetic, unprepossessing older woman) to make her a sympathetic figure who could sneak past normal people's ability to sniff out disordered behaviour.

Other mentally-ill people (women?), as seen on this thread, all wish that they had the Diana magic so that their poor misunderstood selves could be just as beloved as she was.

by Anonymousreply 220October 11, 2022 4:51 PM

"Age appropriately. Not dressed up like they're about to attend a board meeting."

How the hell would you dress children for "the funeral of the century"? Would you put a prince and princess attending the funeral of a monarch into black board shorts and flip-flops?

by Anonymousreply 221October 11, 2022 5:00 PM

"Diana is clearly the patron saint of mentally-ill women."

And femme gays who think they've been used and abused by every top they've ever had.

Like Marilyn Monroe, they're attracted by the mental instability, the blame placed on everyone but Marilyn/Diana/self, and the sheer drama of it all.

by Anonymousreply 222October 11, 2022 5:03 PM

The anti Diana/Camilla lovers hate Diana because she they identify with Camiila, since they too are unattractive to put it charitably and nobody gives a shit about them. The very opposite of Diana.

by Anonymousreply 223October 11, 2022 6:00 PM

^ And Diana lovers think that, by associating themselves with the cause of the leggy blonde, people will forget that they are often rather homely themselves. It's like the fat girl at school who thinks that having an attractive friend gives her "status". Diana lovers are so superficial!

by Anonymousreply 224October 11, 2022 6:06 PM

Does this have to be a Diana versus Camilla thing?

I have a perspective that both have/had great qualities, and like all humans have/had their challenges.

Both are/were connected to Charles, and it appears he is somewhat stabilised by Camilla’s current presence.

That’s a good thing for a British king who has been somewhat unsteady as the Prince of Wales.

Diana has been deceased for a quarter of a decade. May she rest in peace; and it would be great to provide some peace for those who think it necessary to condemn either Diana or Camilla.

by Anonymousreply 225October 11, 2022 6:15 PM

I totally agree, R225, which is totally compatible (as any halfway competent reader will perceive) from my post at R224, which was about Diana's partisans and did not touch on Diana's own personality.

by Anonymousreply 226October 11, 2022 6:22 PM

Of course it doesn't have to be a Diana-vs-Camilla thing! But like any obsessed internet loon, the Diana trolls like to yell that anyone who foesnt hate the same way they do loves or worships whatever it is they hate.

In Trollese, "worship" means "fails to hate as much as I do.

by Anonymousreply 227October 11, 2022 6:54 PM

Camilla has played the harlot long enough at the taxpayers’ expense. Forty years is a more than ample run.

She must take her ill gotten gains and go away to some low place, opening a brothel where she may continue to service Charles if that’s what they both want. But it must be away from public view.

To keep rubbing The People’s face in the shady and illicit roots of this sham “marriage” (and, by extension, the weather-beaten folds of Camilla’s vadge) is unconscionable. Ill advised. The People will not stand for it, nor should they.

Everyone knows this.

by Anonymousreply 228October 11, 2022 7:35 PM

[quote]R135 Camilla is pretty much a nice woman.

Oh, very nice. Fucking a married man with small children and causing his wife to throw herself down the stairs.

by Anonymousreply 229October 11, 2022 8:24 PM

Camilla threw Diana down the stairs? I never knew that.

Did she then cackle like a she-devil and hurl her champagne glass into the roaring fire?

by Anonymousreply 230October 11, 2022 8:59 PM

After seeing what Camilla has to put up with during the recent funeral, it made me like her even more. With or without Camilla, Saint Diana & Chuck *never* would've remained married, so she isn't really responsible for breaking up that horrible marriage. And we know now that Diana was no picnic in her own right. I'm baffled by the people who write comments on their Instagram account about "after what you did to Poor Diana..." - good lord, get over it!

That being said, I'll bet Camilla acts very much like a gatekeeper for cranky, petulant Chuck & I could see where his kids would resent that. You'd think William would take a longer view - if Camilla wasn't around, he and Kate would have to deal with him and that would be no fun, but probably she does Chuck's emotional dirty work with all the members of the family, not just his kids, and that makes her a lightening rod for controversy, even if she doesn't really deserve it.

by Anonymousreply 231October 11, 2022 9:13 PM

[quote] The only thing creepier is the weirdos who worship them, bowing and scraping for "their Majesties" on a frigging Datalounge thread. ENOUGH.

No, the only thing creepier are the weirdos like you who hate them, jabbering and yammering about how ugly and evil they are on DOZENS of fucking Datalounge threads. ENOUGH YOU PATHETIC TROLLS.

by Anonymousreply 232October 11, 2022 11:06 PM

Click the photo for inspiration

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 233October 11, 2022 11:07 PM

Why is Queen Cammie’s color bone deformed?

by Anonymousreply 234October 11, 2022 11:15 PM

collarbone Effen spellcheck

by Anonymousreply 235October 11, 2022 11:16 PM

R234 Because Diana grabbed it as they wrestled before Camilla hurled her down the stairs.

by Anonymousreply 236October 11, 2022 11:23 PM

For the record Diana threw herself down the stairs because she was having some kind of mental breakdown. Poor girl was very mentally ill.

by Anonymousreply 237October 12, 2022 12:13 AM

Wonder why. Cheating husband who only married you for your hymen, and his image?

by Anonymousreply 238October 12, 2022 12:56 AM

[quote]Wonder why. Cheating husband who only married you for your hymen, and his image?

Diana was a hot mess before she ever met Charles. Being a Royal didn't help her sad mental state but it sure didn't create it.

by Anonymousreply 239October 12, 2022 1:16 AM

Why? Did she grab him?..

by Anonymousreply 240October 12, 2022 1:20 AM

So, does all this make Camilla the sluttiest (female) whore to ever wear an English crown?

Sad last days for the monarchy.

by Anonymousreply 241October 12, 2022 1:34 AM

R237 that was Diana’s version. Other versions had her tripping on the bottom step and landing at the feet of the Queen. Or of the Queen Mother, depending on who repeated it. It was around this time that she attempted suicide. By trying to cut her wrists. With a potato peeler.

Believe what you want but it doesn’t make her any less dead,

by Anonymousreply 242October 12, 2022 1:39 AM

OMG read some history. Camilla is small spuds. Sluts..Anne Boleyn, Catherine Howard. Hell, even Victoria. Albert moaned about her being relentless in her sexual demands. Hell, she had about 20 kids.

by Anonymousreply 243October 12, 2022 1:47 AM

On May 6,2023 she will be crowned alongside her husband at Westminster Abbey. I’m sure the priceless Crown Jewels will make up for any perceived lack of looks…

by Anonymousreply 244October 12, 2022 2:18 AM

No, she'll still be an ugly bitch and the jewels will go back to the vault.

by Anonymousreply 245October 12, 2022 2:25 AM

r216: Thank you. You've made my point splendidly.

by Anonymousreply 246October 12, 2022 2:27 AM

[quote] It was around this time that she attempted suicide. By trying to cut her wrists. With a potato peeler.

I heard it was a lemon slicer. Boy, she was crazy.

by Anonymousreply 247October 12, 2022 3:09 AM

Honey, you spend a weekend at Sandringham. You'd be looking for a Draino chaser.

by Anonymousreply 248October 12, 2022 3:20 AM

[quote] Honey, you spend a weekend at Sandringham. You'd be looking for a Draino chaser.

Sweetie, I doubt you've ever been there so how would you know? Talking about things you know nothing about is VERY ignorant.

by Anonymousreply 249October 12, 2022 4:31 AM

You'd be surprised, dear.

by Anonymousreply 250October 12, 2022 4:38 AM

Diana married Charles when she was 19 or 20 and she was fucked up long before then. Perhaps with a loving husband and an understanding, supportive in-law family she would have been all right but I doubt it. Camilla is a good wife for Charles, much better than Diana ever was for him. William is a realist and a pragmatist. He's made his peace with Camilla as far as that goes. No, she will never be "Granny Diana" to his children, nor should she be.

If there is any doubt about William's feelings one of his first acts as King will be to restore Diana's HRH and there will be an end to it. In the meanwhile, he will treat his father's second wife with dignity and respect, as he should. Diana's been dead for 25 years. People have to move on.

by Anonymousreply 251October 12, 2022 4:50 AM

What about Camilla? Her husband was fucking Anne. Sounds normal to me.

by Anonymousreply 252October 12, 2022 4:58 AM

"So, does all this make Camilla the sluttiest (female) whore to ever wear an English crown?"

Well, I searched Bing Images for "sluttiest queen of England", and what came up was a million pictures of Elizabeth II and this "slutty Queen" costume!

But yeah. The correct answer is probably Katherine Howard, poor girl.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 253October 12, 2022 5:22 AM

I was a witch.

by Anonymousreply 254October 12, 2022 6:17 AM

[quote] Camilla;s biggest crime is that she is a blowsy, plain older woman who doesn't care about glamour or fashion. If she were a stylish, beautiful, elegant older woman like Carmen Dell'Orefice, the anti-Camilla sentiment would have been minuscule from the start.

Except Camilla is ugly to the bone. Cant work with that. Plus she doesn't take care of herself much either. Her skin is like dried up leather.

by Anonymousreply 255October 12, 2022 10:31 AM

[quote]Diana married Charles when she was 19 or 20 and she was fucked up long before then.

For Christ sake, she was only 19, how much is "long before that" could she be? You Camilla apologist are really a piece of work. I bet Camilla would not be so composed in her marriage is another woman 15 years her senior did the same thing trying to steal Charles away from her. Guarantee she would be a really tacky and vindictive cunt about it.

by Anonymousreply 256October 12, 2022 10:36 AM

[quote]Diana's been dead for 25 years. People have to move on.

So has 99% of the Monarchy. lets just shut it down and move on. Who cares about old history of uber wealthy kings and queens anyway, ancient history. It's 2022, you have a parliament, prime minister, let it go already and move on. It's been 1,200 years! People have to move on.

by Anonymousreply 257October 12, 2022 10:41 AM

r255: Thank you for another post confirming my thesis. The loathing of Camiila is all about her (lack of) fashion sense and to a slightly lesser extent ,her age. A beautiful fashionable older woman would not inspire such vitriol......instead there would even be a certain amount of admiration.

by Anonymousreply 258October 12, 2022 5:27 PM

R257 Americans with a country about to be plunged into civil war advising Brits what to do.

by Anonymousreply 259October 12, 2022 7:05 PM

SLAP HER FACE! Viciously!!!

by Anonymousreply 260October 12, 2022 7:12 PM

Americans always know best, even when they don’t.

by Anonymousreply 261October 12, 2022 8:03 PM

R261 As an American who lived most of my life in Europe, the Ugly American stereotype has never been shaken off: part of it is cultural cringe. They feel inferior and so have to scream louder.

I just watched a documentary about Althorp with Earl Spencer. He looks like absolute hell and he was younger than Diana. Diana's sisters also look like hell so I'm thinking Diana would have too.

by Anonymousreply 262October 12, 2022 11:25 PM

Right, so you base your argument on peoples’ looks, R262. Living most of your life in Europe hasn’t made you any less American has it?

by Anonymousreply 263October 12, 2022 11:34 PM

R263 sugar, as a gay man judging people on their looks is a given. Go back to The Mary Sue.

by Anonymousreply 264October 12, 2022 11:36 PM

Earl Spencer and his surviving sisters Lady Jane Fellowes and Lady Sarah McCorquodale have no role in the government or sovereignty of the UK so I’m not sure what your point is, R262?

Do you know?

by Anonymousreply 265October 12, 2022 11:38 PM

Another well thought out, succinctly expressed and highly qualified American opinion, R264. Well done!

by Anonymousreply 266October 12, 2022 11:39 PM

Diana would have kept her looks. Maybe she would've gone a little overboard with plastic surgery like so many celebrity women of her generation, but she would not have aged naturally like some forgotten, weathered-looking gentry in the hinterlands like her siblings. She was a vain woman in the public eye, and seeking revenge through "living well" while Charles and Camilla predictably aged into their dreadful older selves. She would inevitably have to choose between her ass and her face, and even though I think she'd choose her ass and keep a fit and trim build at the expense of youthful facial fat, I still think she would have aged into a (still) photogenic woman with a mature and serene beauty.

by Anonymousreply 267October 12, 2022 11:45 PM

Nope. Diana was an English Rose who had lost most of her dew. She was beginning to look leathery and hard even at 36. If she'd lived to age 50, all of that famous beauty would have been gone. Given her endless need for tabloid theatrics, she might not be much more respected than Fergie. The press and public were turning on her in that last summer of 1997. Her death made her a saint, but she sure wasn't living like one.

by Anonymousreply 268October 13, 2022 2:17 AM

Diana a few months before her death. A handsome woman, but not the stunner she was in her 20s.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 269October 13, 2022 2:20 AM

I think Diana would have aged wonderfully! Partly because she seems to have been far more looks-conscious than her siblings, partly because she would have forked out for the best plastic surgery, partly because Nature had given her looks that could have changed from "English Rose" to "Aquiline Elegance" as she matured.

Of course there was a chance she would have gone nuts with plastic surgery or drunk her looks away like Harry's doing now, but I think she'd have done a much better job of aging that her family. With her model's figure, elegant bone structure, and beautiful coloring (maintained by any means necessary), she'd have looked as fabulous as a fifty or sixty year old woman can look.

by Anonymousreply 270October 13, 2022 3:37 AM

Diana COULD have, but given her mental issues and serious vanity, there's no way she wouldn't have gone the plastic surgery route. She was also a sun-worshipper, and that ages you fast. She'd have gotten the hard look all former English roses do--Kate Winslet is a perfect example of the same process. Handsome women but not exquisite as in youth.

People have heard so much hagiography about Diana that they forget she was a divisive figure in the mid-90s and involved in a fair share of scandals. If she hadn't found a way to clean up her personal life and focus on her charitable efforts, her reputation would have suffered greatly in her 40s, especially if she'd succumbed to the instant highs of social media. And once you're no longer gorgeous, the public gives you far less leeway.

by Anonymousreply 271October 13, 2022 3:41 AM

[quote] If she were a stylish, beautiful, elegant older woman like Carmen Dell'Orefice,

Charles could have had his pick of women like that, and yet insanely he did not consult you. Didnt he realize his job was to find a wife who could be some sort of fabulous gay icon to you personally?

by Anonymousreply 272October 13, 2022 3:45 AM

Diana’s mother was a pretty indicator how how she may have turned out. Mind you Frances was hitting the bottle at this stage but still was attractive for a woman of her age (mid sixties here).

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 273October 13, 2022 3:46 AM

[quote] You'd be looking for a Draino chaser.

Oh, [italic]dear.[/italic]

by Anonymousreply 274October 13, 2022 3:47 AM

Age progression photo of Diana.

Compared to Henry the 8th (VIII), this is very mild.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 275October 13, 2022 3:49 AM

Better pic

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 276October 13, 2022 3:50 AM

Yes, Diana's mother looked good for an older woman, but Diana would probably have looked better. Take the mother, and add a fabulously chic outfit instead of something Hycainth Bucket would wear, add a little plastic surgery, subtract a few dress sizes, and add that mysterious quality of being photogenic.

Yes, Diana would have looked harder over forty, but that isn't a huge handicap to a woman who's trying to look stylish and elegant rather than girlish. And Diana's style was never about girlishness.

by Anonymousreply 277October 13, 2022 4:07 AM

Of course, the HORSEMILLA cunt eaters like to put it out there that Diana would not have aged well, when as we all know, the opposite is much more likely. Not to mention, that you simply cant get more hideous than HORSEMILLA, except maybe her cunt eating loons.

by Anonymousreply 278October 13, 2022 4:13 AM

R275 older Diana looks just like Chris Evert.

by Anonymousreply 279October 13, 2022 4:20 AM

Why, hello R278! Did the nurse undo your restraints for exercise time?

by Anonymousreply 280October 13, 2022 4:23 AM

No matter, she would always have looked better than 🐎- she did at 20, 30 and had she been alive today as well.

by Anonymousreply 281October 13, 2022 4:24 AM

The Camilla is a Whore Troll IS the Joanne Woodward is the Homewrecker Troll.

by Anonymousreply 282October 13, 2022 4:25 AM

But she’s not alive today, R281. She died in 1997.

And you’re still not over it.

by Anonymousreply 283October 13, 2022 4:26 AM

The Camilla is a Whore troll was cheated on in 7th grade and has never, ever gotten over it.

by Anonymousreply 284October 13, 2022 4:29 AM

Would YOU get over it is Camilla stole your boyfriend in 7th grade?? I think not.

That weather-beaten cunt’s been pulling the same old trick from Day One.

by Anonymousreply 285October 13, 2022 4:43 AM

Oh R285 I almost feel embarrassed for you based on your juvenile output along with random use of “weather-beaten cunt”.

Almost, but not quite - you’re a deluded halfwit.

by Anonymousreply 286October 13, 2022 4:53 AM

[quote]r286 random use of “weather-beaten cunt”.

RANDOM?? What state do you THINK it’s in?!

by Anonymousreply 287October 13, 2022 4:56 AM

This thread is kinda useless without the video of William slapping Camilla in the face.

by Anonymousreply 288October 13, 2022 4:56 AM

Or the weather-beaten cunt.

by Anonymousreply 289October 13, 2022 5:14 AM

I'll never forget reading that Camilla didn't change her knickers between horseback riding during the day, and going out at night. The stench?

by Anonymousreply 290October 13, 2022 5:20 AM

Have your carers tried Librium, R290?

by Anonymousreply 291October 13, 2022 5:30 AM

It’s a legitimate horror.

by Anonymousreply 292October 13, 2022 6:56 AM

r272: You do realize I was creating a hypothetical scenario where a beautiful mistress would not have received the vilification dowdy Camilla has? Do try to keep up.

by Anonymousreply 293October 13, 2022 1:34 PM

As an eldergay and devoted Diana fan during her life, I can assure you her death was a great career move. She was turning into a Eurotrash embarrassment starring in Voici. She chased the media and the paps as much as they chased her. She had turned into a desperate attention whore. Had she not died, there would have been an endless stream of successively less attractive and rich lovers she would parade on the Riviera.

by Anonymousreply 294October 13, 2022 4:08 PM

That’s one path. Or she might have remarried, had more children, aligned herself with a high profile charity, and wintered in Malibu. We really don’t know.

The only surety is she’d never have forgiven King Tampon and his weather-beaten old cunt whore within her own lifetime. And who could?

by Anonymousreply 295October 13, 2022 5:22 PM

There’s “weather-beaten” again. You need a new adjective R295.

by Anonymousreply 296October 13, 2022 5:26 PM

Di wanted to marry the doctor, who was not trash. I really don't think she would've had a 2nd batch of children. The RF probably would have paid her to not create half-siblings of William & Harry.

by Anonymousreply 297October 13, 2022 5:27 PM

[quote]r297 The RF probably would have paid her to not create half-siblings of William & Harry.

At which point she would have promptly told them to take their money and go fuck themselves in the weather-beaten old whore cunt.

by Anonymousreply 298October 13, 2022 5:31 PM

[quote]r296 There’s “weather-beaten” again. You need a new adjective

Like “dangling tendrils“?

by Anonymousreply 299October 13, 2022 5:32 PM

Obviously Diana would marry money (not Dodi), but I don't think she would have more kids. 2 are plenty, especially when one will be King.

by Anonymousreply 300October 13, 2022 5:40 PM

Diana’s death helped Charles rehab his image over the years.

Camila can become queen consort and be accepted as such because Diana is dead, if she were alive things would be much more complicated.

by Anonymousreply 301October 13, 2022 8:20 PM

Well, that and millions of pounds spent on publicists.

by Anonymousreply 302October 13, 2022 9:04 PM

Tina Brown said in her Diana biography that Diana's relationship with Charles was warming in the last months of her life. She was beginning to understand that Camilla really was his one true love. Probably, getting out of the Palace and being a truly free woman was good for her. It's possible Dodi Fayed would have been her final farewell to cafe society, and she'd have focused on her charitable work and eventually found a soulmate of her own.

That said, even if relations between Charles and Diana had warmed considerably, he never could have married Camilla with Diana still living. He'd have had to be content with being a divorced, single monarch.

by Anonymousreply 303October 13, 2022 9:47 PM

R294, you may have been a Diana fan during her life, but very doubtful. I suspect you are now actually one of the crazed anti Diana dumbfucks!

by Anonymousreply 304October 14, 2022 2:51 AM

R304 = crazed anti-Camilla dumbfuck

by Anonymousreply 305October 14, 2022 3:31 AM

R303 That is why I stepped in so to speak.

by Anonymousreply 306October 14, 2022 11:38 AM

[quote]Americans with a country about to be plunged into civil war advising Brits what to do.

Happy Brexit Day! Brits are so cleaver disengaging from the EU. Enjoy your return the the dark ages.

by Anonymousreply 307October 14, 2022 11:59 AM

Im guessing that since the prince is 40, he doesnt need a replacement mommy at this point in his life

by Anonymousreply 308October 14, 2022 12:03 PM

R304 I adored Diana, she was a Star. But since her death, too much has come out: her stalking of Oliver Hoare and Will Carling, how she used William as her confidant, how she used Richard Kay as her mouthpiece, how she used the paparazzi to get attention. She was a sad person but her sadness was mostly of her own making. She had borderline personality disorder but rather than regularly seeing a qualified psychiatrist who might have helped her, she turned to psychics, fortune tellers, astrologers.

by Anonymousreply 309October 14, 2022 3:10 PM

Well, the family teenage Diana was pressured to marry into was highly dishonest and dysfunctional. In the end, the fact that she got out at all is remarkable.

by Anonymousreply 310October 14, 2022 5:32 PM

R310 she never got out. She was famous - like Harry is - because she married into the royal family. If she had married James Gilbey or any of her other lovers, no one would know who she is.

by Anonymousreply 311October 14, 2022 7:29 PM

I agree with Tina Brown, that if Diana had married one of the other aristos in her set she'd never have been as extraordinary--pain made her interesting--but she would have been content.

However, I think Diana would have had to go through one, maybe two bad marriages before finally growing up and finding her balance. But that's true of many people.

by Anonymousreply 312October 14, 2022 10:59 PM

Love how they snuck in “Queen CONSORT Camilla”. It was said that she’d never be called Queen anything, but now Charles’s team has pulled a slick one.

by Anonymousreply 313October 14, 2022 11:35 PM

R307 - Amazingly, the lights are still on in Britain. The place is overrun with migrants who can't wait to get out of France, and refuse to file for asylum there, and speaking of the Dark Ages . . . did you happen to notice the role Britain played in support for Ukraine as the Vlad the Invader brought the Dark Ages in there?

Did you happen to notice the election results in France last May, or in Italy two weeks ago? Did you happen to notice how Germany is in Vlad's and Erdogan's pocket?

Yessirree that EU is just the Alpha and Omega of human society!

by Anonymousreply 314October 14, 2022 11:55 PM

R313, I think they're using that title because Elizabeth will be THE Queen for the next few generations.

by Anonymousreply 315October 15, 2022 12:04 AM

R312 Diana would never have learned anything of the kind. She was still making all the same mistakes she made in her marriage: scheming, manipulating, lying, putting out one face to charm and another once she nailed her mark . . . that woman was in her thirties when she stalked Oliver Hoare and called him 200 times in a couple of days before legal threats finally made her stop and she had to issue a public apology.

Her narcissism and border issue were rooted in childhood and character. She never once assumed the remotest responsibility for anything that went wrong. It was always someone else's fault.

At 37, after ten years of marriage and two children she had learnt absolutely nothing.

Any woman of 37 who allowed Mohammed Fayed to use her and his son so she could look like a desired woman and have someplace luxurious to spend the summer, hadn't learned a thing. No woman who'd learnt anything would have let Dodi Fayed within an inch of her.

She handled Hasnat Khan badly, too.

She only got away with being pushy, demanding, endlessly needy, and dishonest because she was young and beautiful and haloed with royal tinsel.

Maybe in her forties she'd have settled for some sixty year old divorced billionaire . . . that is, if he hadn't already snagged someone 10 y ears younger than she, like, say, her niece, Lady Kitty Spencer.

Diana was an idiot. Her younger son is an idiot. Her younger son's wife is an idiot.

by Anonymousreply 316October 15, 2022 12:05 AM

A nice thing about Diana is she didn’t have a weather-beaten old whore cunt. Like some people.

by Anonymousreply 317October 15, 2022 12:09 AM

“Weather-beaten cunt”? R317 I keep telling you - you need to invest in a thesaurus.

by Anonymousreply 318October 15, 2022 1:11 AM

R316 that's all true. The fact that Diana was exploiting and allowing herself to be exploited by grifter Mohammed Al Fayed is beneath contempt. Dodi who was an idiot, had a fiancee but pretended he was in a relationship with Diana to get publicity for his Daddy.

by Anonymousreply 319October 15, 2022 1:25 AM

[quote] A nice thing about Diana is she didn’t have a weather-beaten old whore cunt

She sure did! She had a weather beaten YOUNG cunt. Girl couldn't keep her legs closed. She was a neurotic, mentally unstable slut.

by Anonymousreply 320October 15, 2022 2:15 AM

^Who stalked & tormented married men & their wives.

by Anonymousreply 321October 15, 2022 2:17 AM

What a surprise, 316 hates Diana, Harry and Meghan,NOT! I have always known that the the deranged, Diana & Meghan hating pieces of HORSESHIT were one in the same!!

by Anonymousreply 322October 15, 2022 2:48 AM

I don't know much about Di's years between 1992 and her death. Just summaries of the Andrew Morton book, the Martin Bashir interview, her attending the Met Gala with Liz Tilberis (the Great, RIP) and auctioning off many of her dresses for charity.

The late Paula Yates told a story that Di had told her that when PY and Michael Hutchence were on the cover of the UK tabloids, Di felt it gave her a break. But Paula told a lot of tales that weren't exactly true.

So what is the best source for finding out about how Di's life was, 92-97, and how it was covered by the UK press? Especially the Mail, considering her rship with Richard Kay?

In Australia when she died, a tabloid called Woman's Day had to pulp an upcoming issue featuring Di and Dodi on the cover, and rush out a Di memorial edition.

by Anonymousreply 323October 15, 2022 4:51 AM

Al Fayed put up the tackiest, most godawful "tribute" to Diana and Dodi in Harrods. Just appalling. Al Fayed tried to claim Di was pregnant which wasn't true, like he claimed Prince Philip had Diana killed. Al Fayed was a Trumpesque figure, a liar desperate for publicity and status who thankfully has disappeared.

by Anonymousreply 324October 15, 2022 5:05 AM

The best book about Diana is "Diana In Search of Herself: Portrait of a Troubled Princess" by Sally Bedell Smith. It's a very well written well researched, unbiased account of her life, not the usual tabloid trash.

by Anonymousreply 325October 15, 2022 5:07 AM

Thanks, r325

by Anonymousreply 326October 15, 2022 5:18 AM

R309 = Camilla's PR manager working over time Boris style.

"Im a Democrat but."... =" I adored Diana, she was a Star. But....."

by Anonymousreply 327October 15, 2022 9:15 AM

[quote] But since her death, too much has come out: her stalking of Oliver Hoare and Will Carling, how she used William as her confidant, how she used Richard Kay as her mouthpiece, how she used the paparazzi to get attention. She was a sad person but her sadness was mostly of her own making. She had borderline personality disorder but rather than regularly seeing a qualified psychiatrist who might have helped her, she turned to psychics, fortune tellers, astrologers.

All of that is rumor, for fucks sake, don't you have any common sense to filter things you read in gossip papers? You know she was "borderline" yet you admit yourself she's never been even seen a psychiatrist? But you know it true? Based on what? Provide a link to that diagnosis if you are so sure. I call BS on your facts or what you "know" to be true.

FYI professionals refrain from diagnosing people in the media they have not met in person for a reason. It's all a guess work based on filtered content.

by Anonymousreply 328October 15, 2022 9:22 AM

William, of all people, likely understood what a "complex" person his mother was; I'm guessing his relationship with Cam has more to do with present circumstances (Cam being a gatekeeper for his father? Whispering in Chuck's easily influenced ear rather than listening to William?) rather than some old grudge involving his mother. And it can't be that bad - Kate seems to like Camilla & I doubt she'd do anything against Will. He's probably like "thank god you're talking to her so I don't have to! But do find out what the old codger is up to. I don't want to have to read about it in the Telegraph"

by Anonymousreply 329October 15, 2022 10:55 AM

The Bedell Smith book about Diana is excellent. She doesn't whitewash Diana's mental issues and bad behaviour or her early obsess8with marrying Charles and bring Princess of Wales. But the author doesn't have an axe to grind and presents Diana, warts and all, honestly but humanely.

by Anonymousreply 330October 15, 2022 11:25 AM

Parker-Bowles' short, torrid affair with Anne predated his marriage to Camilla. He fucked every woman in their circle, all of whom were curious about his alleged expertise in the sack.

And Charles having had an affair with Diana's sister, Sarah, didn't seem to stop Diana from eagerly picking that giant sapphire out from the tray of rings from Garrard's when Charles invited her to do so, did it?

by Anonymousreply 331October 15, 2022 11:31 AM

Diana was smart to pick the big-ass sapphire, sapphires became her signature gemstone and she got given some great jewels!

Nobody ever looked better in great big sapphires, either, nobody else had her sapphire-blue eyes.

by Anonymousreply 332October 15, 2022 11:50 AM

Actually, there are a few "professionals" on DL who HAVE weighed in on the issues so glaringly displayed by the players in this saga. And some of us actually KNOW some professionals who have weighed in on it.

And Diana was in counselling for some time. But it didn't help, any more than it seems to have helped her younger son, who, by this own public statements, has experienced either three or seven or five years of therapy depending on which year's admission he made.

Harry Windsor, who went on television and stated that now that his (25 years' dead) mother has "finished helping to set my brother up [sic] is now helping me", I think has given us all enough to go on regarding his maturity and mental health. He's fucking 38 years old, a married father of two, and he's still enmeshed in his obsession with his dead mother.

Diana's long-chronicled habit of historical rewrite, and her stalking of Oliver Hoare, are on the public record.

They aren't rumours. The "rewrite" is evident in how she looked back on her wedding when things went south and she described feeling like the "lamb to the slaughter" forgetting that the people around her getting her ready for the Big Day, described her driving a tricycle up and down the corridor tooting the horn and singing joyously, "I'm marrying the Prince of Wales tomorrow! I'm marrying the Prince of Wales tomorrow!" and exhibiting nothing but ecstatic triumphalism.

Oliver Hoare, who passed away in 2018 of cancer, was one of the world's leading art dealers in Islamic art. He had a brief affair with Diana whilst married (one of the several married men Diana indulged herself with). Here is an excerpt on the "nuisance phone calls" that you claim are nothing but rumours:

"It was January 13, 1994 and this was the log of calls made to the home of art dealer Oliver Hoare and his wife Diane de Waldner de Freundstein.

Starting the year before, the couple began receiving nuisance phone calls. Sometimes they were greeted with silence, while on another instance, de Waldner de Freundstein picked up the phone to hear someone screaming abuse at her.

" . . . So, by January 1994, she had had enough. According to reports, she called the police who placed a tracker on the phone. (Oliver was an Islamic art dealer and some have claimed that she feared that terrorist forces were behind this oral assault.)

The authorities soon realised the calls were coming from one of the most famous homes in the world — Kensington Palace. Their investigation also revealed that the 300-odd calls had also come from pay phones in Kensington and Notting Hill, the home of Lady Sarah McCorquodale and, most damningly, the mobile phone belonging to none other than Diana, Princess of Wales."

You might want to do some research before posting, because you absolutely cannot BEAR the thought that people you worship might actually have done some very nasty things that would shake your worldview.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 333October 15, 2022 12:41 PM

Maybe in her forties she'd have settled for some sixty year old divorced billionaire . . . that is, if he hadn't already snagged someone 10 y ears younger than she, like, say, her niece, Lady Kitty Spencer.

R324 - which is worse, the Diana tribute statue at Harrod's or the Michael Jackson statue he installed al Fayed installed at Craven Cottage?

by Anonymousreply 334October 15, 2022 1:06 PM

I forgot to block quote and add at r334 that Teddy Forstmann, the NY billionaire, was interested in Diana after her divorce. He was about 20 years older and she wasn't interested at the time. But who knows if she had lived. The prospect of unfettered access to unbelievable wealth, homes on both sides of the Atlantic, and the freedom to do anything she pleased may have been too enticing. And she could have easily continued and expanded her charity work and recovered her image.

by Anonymousreply 335October 15, 2022 1:16 PM

Except marrying a billionaire doesn't give a gal the freedom to do anything she pleases, it gives her the freedom to do anything the billionaire pleases.

Remember that, Dataloungers, the next time a billionaire wants to marry you.

by Anonymousreply 336October 15, 2022 1:32 PM

[quote]r333 Actually, there are a few "professionals" on DL who HAVE weighed in on the issues so glaringly displayed by the players in this saga. And some of us actually KNOW some professionals who have weighed in on it.

True. Wasn’t it a gynecologist here who first diagnosed Camilla’s weather-beaten old whore cunt?

Or perhaps it was just a casual observer.

by Anonymousreply 337October 15, 2022 1:52 PM

R316, I see your points. However, one could possibly assume that a Diana who wasn't exposed to the glare of worldwide fame at 19 might have developed in a less twisted way. A lot of us our messes in our early 20s but get over it and go on to lead stable lives, since we do our growing out of the spotlight.

by Anonymousreply 338October 15, 2022 3:04 PM

Sarah Spencer, who also suffered from an eating disorder and set her cap for Charles (only to blow it all by giving a disastrous interview about the relationship . . . hmmm) eventually married a wealthy gentleman farmer and calmed down wonderfully. She is a good template for what might have happened to Diana.

That said, Sarah was also far more intelligent than Diana. She had something like 8 O-levels, but never went to university because her family didn't see it as worthwhile to educate girls who were just going to get married anyway. The Spencer girls were of the last generation of posh English girls subjected to that bullshit.

by Anonymousreply 339October 15, 2022 3:06 PM

R338 You missed the essential point: Diana's issues were already well developed by the time she married Charles. It was those issues that made her handle her marriage so badly and marry a man she knew had had an affair with her sister and who had made it clear he wasn't terribly in love with her.

The fact is, very few people really change.

She was incapable of a healthy relationship because of her vast need for endless affirmation, adoration, and proof that she was the centre of the Universe.

That's how Fayed treated her.

No one can "develop" without reaching the root of the problem.

Charles is capable of domestic content? Whatever his other flaws.

And, frankly, I think Charles was a better father than he's given credit for, and that Diana for all her public tactile shit, was a worse mother than she's given credit for being.

And in re that endless performative tactile shit, remind you of anyone?

Poor deluded Harry.

by Anonymousreply 340October 15, 2022 3:18 PM

The past can still hang over a person's life, despite the current situation or circumstances.

by Anonymousreply 341October 15, 2022 3:31 PM

Whatever flaws Diana may have had, they pale in comparison to Charles...if he were a commoner, he'd have to pay for pussy. He's only been able to womanize because of his titles. He's ugly af, spoiled and not too mentally stable himself.

by Anonymousreply 342October 15, 2022 4:34 PM

[quote] Whatever flaws Diana may have had, they pale in comparison to Charles..

Nope. She behaved very badly, was paranoid, used the press to further her own aims, fucked around with impunity. She was a mess. Your hated of Charles suggests you're not too mentally stable yourself.

by Anonymousreply 343October 15, 2022 8:37 PM

I once worked for a professor of psychiatry (who has since died, so sue him) who was a pal of the psychiatrist Diana went to in London. There were both pals of Otto Kernberg. He told me she'd been diagnosed with borderline personality disorder (this was years after her death). However, BPDs respond poorly to therapy and she lost patience with her therapist and started running to astrologers and refused to follow any advice he gave her.

Other gossip tidbit from Paulina Kernberg (who is now dead, so sue her). When she evaluated Elian Gonzalez, the kid who was fought over by both the Cuban government and the Miami Cubans, she recommended that he be given back to his father in Cuba as the Miami cousins were all batshit crazy (maybe not the term she used..).

by Anonymousreply 344October 15, 2022 10:24 PM

[quote]Your hated of Charles suggests you're not too mentally stable yourself.

Who said that they hated Charles? I don't care for him, but I don't hate him. I think your hatred of Meghan and Harry is quite obvious. And Harry's mother of course.

Another tiresome royal keeper. You know everything that they are doing. You can tell everything that they are thinking just by watching them arch an eyebrow or wearing a certain outfit and you've got them pegged. LOL.

And it's hatRed of, not hated of. LOL. In your rush to attack those who disagree with you or to prove your point, your spelling is a bit off, dear. But hate away.

by Anonymousreply 345October 15, 2022 11:36 PM

If you need to focus on a typographical error, you have lost the argument.

by Anonymousreply 346October 15, 2022 11:49 PM

There's no argument...just from you. Hate away, it's giving me a few chuckles in between eyerolls, r346...

by Anonymousreply 347October 16, 2022 12:02 AM

At least Diana didn’t declare to the world she wanted to be her adulterous lover’s TAMPON!

by Anonymousreply 348October 16, 2022 12:09 AM

You have me confused with someone else, r346. I have never claimed to hate anyone. I merely asserted it’s silly to argue about a typographical error.

by Anonymousreply 349October 16, 2022 1:02 AM

[quote] Who said that they hated Charles? I don't care for him, but I don't hate him. I think your hatred of Meghan and Harry is quite obvious. And Harry's mother of course.

The Royals are of little interest to me, although I do on occasion post something on these crazy anti-Camilla, anti-Charles threads. I believe you said this about him: ".if he were a commoner, he'd have to pay for pussy. He's only been able to womanize because of his titles. He's ugly af, spoiled and not too mentally stable himself" which strongly indicates that you are afflicted with an irrational hatred of him. You are unwell, dear. Get some help.

by Anonymousreply 350October 16, 2022 1:04 AM

Charles never claimed he wanted to be a tampon. He stated with his bad luck, he would end up as something like a tampon, r348.

by Anonymousreply 351October 16, 2022 1:05 AM

Oh, look! Someone, R288, actually noticed the title of this thread is bullshit!!!!!!!

R288 for the win.

by Anonymousreply 352October 16, 2022 1:16 AM

[quote] Someone, [R288], actually noticed the title of this thread is bullshit!!!!!!!

I think anyone with a brain knew the title is bullshit. Somebody just decided to make note of it. I mean, how could anyone in their right mind believe William "slapped" Camilla in any way, shape or form?

by Anonymousreply 353October 16, 2022 1:35 AM

R350 aren’t you done with the gaslighting yet? We know exactly what you meant. Now you’re behaving like a cornered rat. Defensive and hostile. Are you even a gay man? Are you a frau from one of those royal websites? You people are like roaches over here.

by Anonymousreply 354October 16, 2022 2:28 AM

[quote]Nope. She behaved very badly, was paranoid, used the press to further her own aims, fucked around with impunity. She was a mess.

Oh for fucks sake, even if you dont know all the salacious history written about her by other people after she was dead, you only need one minute of viewing time to see what Prick Charles is as the new king. Douche bag cant even be bothered to move an item on his desk by himself, give a nasty stare to his minions as to why they didn't do it for him. And that was just the nasty behavior he thought nothing of on camera. Imagine what he's like when the camera lights are off.

I am pretty sure seeking out a naive barely legal young woman to breed your future heirs to the thrown knowing you do NOT love her with the intent to cheat on her ASAP qualifies as "behaving badly" and fucking around. Not to mention selfish, manipulative, disrespectful and fraught with entitlement and sense of impunity.

by Anonymousreply 355October 16, 2022 3:16 AM

FUCK OFF R340/343!! You think you are some expert on Diana's problem and better than everyone else. Well guess what , YOU'RE NOT!!! Get back to eating out CUNTMILAS shriveled up twat!

by Anonymousreply 356October 16, 2022 3:40 AM

^^ the accepted term is “weather-beaten”

by Anonymousreply 357October 16, 2022 3:41 AM

R340 thinks cherry picking opinions and quotes from strangers which are NOT facts somehow mean anything. They prove nothing except that he's an idiot with a butt plug up his ass jacking off to how he love/hates Princess Diana.

by Anonymousreply 358October 16, 2022 3:48 AM

The Cuntmila Troll aka The Joanne Woodward is a Homewrecker Troll is off its meds.

by Anonymousreply 359October 16, 2022 4:19 AM

R354, R355 and R356 is an unhinged troll who is mentally ill and needs to be committed to a secure mental facility for a long, long time. How pitiable. The poor, poor imbecile.

by Anonymousreply 360October 16, 2022 4:42 AM

Agree, the fixation on Camilla’s lady parts is off the dial.

by Anonymousreply 361October 16, 2022 5:05 AM

Well, once Charles and Camilla started the whole “I want to be your tampon” business, it’s all one can see when you look at her.

by Anonymousreply 362October 16, 2022 5:32 AM

I believe in a free press, but the News of the World deserved to be driven out of business for hacking people’s phones.

by Anonymousreply 363October 16, 2022 6:41 AM

He didn’t say that though, r362.

by Anonymousreply 364October 16, 2022 7:05 AM

If Charles and Camilla really wanted to be altruistic, they’d develop or endorse a line of tampons, with the money going to charity.

by Anonymousreply 365October 16, 2022 8:14 AM

R364, it was close enough and a cringe worthy conversation for adults.

by Anonymousreply 366October 16, 2022 8:26 AM

No, it wasn’t close enough.

by Anonymousreply 367October 16, 2022 8:40 AM

R362, I just see ugly.

by Anonymousreply 368October 16, 2022 12:57 PM

[quote]r365 If Charles and Camilla really wanted to be altruistic, they’d develop or endorse a line of tampons, with the money going to charity.

[bold]The Camilla Crammer[/bold] ©️

by Anonymousreply 369October 16, 2022 4:23 PM

So funnnnneeeeeeee!

by Anonymousreply 370October 16, 2022 5:51 PM

After fucking Rose Cholmondeley, William's glass house should stop blaming Camilla for his parents' failed marriage.

by Anonymousreply 371October 16, 2022 8:23 PM

Anyone who believes William had an affair with Rose is too stupid to take seriously.

by Anonymousreply 372October 17, 2022 12:29 AM

R372 this is how Meghan Markle spends her time. Trolling the DL.

by Anonymousreply 373October 17, 2022 1:29 AM

He did slap Camilla. I saw it.

by Anonymousreply 374October 17, 2022 3:36 AM

Rose would do anal and peg. I believe it.

by Anonymousreply 375October 17, 2022 4:06 AM

Well done on being able to spell “Cholmondeley”, R371! Most of the Sewage Squad don’t even exist attempt it.

It’s still all based on a drunken lie by Giles Corey, since recanted, but you get a gold star for spelling obscure English aristocratic names.

Now how to pronounce it, R371?

by Anonymousreply 376October 17, 2022 4:23 AM

For most of us, ATM stands for “automated teller machine,” but to Rose Cholomondeley it means something entirely different.

And for anyone tempted to judge her, keep in mind pregnancy must be avoided at all costs.

by Anonymousreply 377October 17, 2022 11:16 AM

I'm sure she's expert. Her hubby is gay!

by Anonymousreply 378October 17, 2022 1:15 PM

Last night I dreamt I went to Chomondeley again…

by Anonymousreply 379October 17, 2022 2:29 PM

How is Camilla today?

by Anonymousreply 380January 9, 2023 11:22 PM

Brilliant, Daphne @ r379!

by Anonymousreply 381January 10, 2023 1:46 AM

She's a beard.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 382January 10, 2023 2:16 AM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!