Which DL Topic Are You Tired Of?

That British gay boy from that British show on Netflix about the boy teens who fall in love.

No contest: Trans.

Trans

Meghan and Harry

[quote] That British gay boy from that British show on Netflix about the boy teens who fall in love.

?

Where is the Zoo! option?

R4- I found out his name

Sebastian Croft. I have nothing against him but who is the TROLL posting ENDLESS threads about him.

Britshit.

The not-so-stealthy tranny hate threads.

Teenage TV series.

What R1 said.

Meghan and Harry, and it’s not even close.

Right-wing propaganda about trans people

Right-wing propaganda about Harry and Meghan

Pretty much anything about the royals

Joe Locke. Who even is this person?

Thanks, R6.

This one:

[quote]Which DL Topic Are You Tired Of?

Trump. He lives rent free all over DL

I’d like to see a DL moratorium on the topics of trans people and wokeness.

I know people get tired of hearing about Trump, but it gets real fuckin' old to see people shrieking "stop talking about Trump!" on a thread with actual news about the coup attempt or the stealing of classified documents or one of the many lawsuits that's being filed against him.

The guy did crimes and is getting investigated and sued for it, so sometimes, he's in the news.

🤷🏽‍♂️

Constant pitching of shows on NETFLIX.

I sure do miss the days when DL had subject categories, so one didn't have to endlessly scroll through every fucking topic/thread to find ones you might be interested in. That alone would probably cut the number of duplicate topics significantly.

Meghan Markle threads

The entire British royal family

Anything that comes from TikTok

Women's issues

I’m tired of the Let’s Be threads, especially when the first poster says “I’ll start.” Of course you are, because you’re already starting the thread & only did so because you have such a clever, twee comment to make about it, it’s usually the only highlight of the entire thread (if it’s even funny at all).

The Royals, ALL OF THEM. Megan, Harry the dead Queen. Enough already. Take it to the Royal Forums if you still cant stop talking about them. I am sure there are plenty of online Royals only gossip out there, stop pouting this gay board with non-gay Royal Bull Shit. We DON'T CARE.

MJ was a Pedo

The guy died years ago, who cares, it's not breaking news. Let it go already. I am sure it's Fraus who keep posting these.

After 4 years of that fat fuck, I don't want to read about him anymore.

Trump. Every single thread has posts that reference him. It’s inescapable.

The Royal/MM threads. I used to enjoy them, but they’ve become very black and white with a lot of crazies who take that shit way too seriously. They ran the topic to the ground and it’s all very boring now.

Honorable mention to Sebastian Croft threads. I don’t know who he is and never click the threads, but he’s all over this place.

Pete Buttigieg

Trans pro or con. It's only .01% of the population but it's like 30% of the conversation here. Both sides are equally nutty and Troll obsessed.

Draining pasta.

Caftans

Earrings

Agree with R25. Also adding this "Froy" creature to the list. No idea who he is or what he does, but a couple of overweight women seem to be obsessed with him. Sad.

May as well throw this "Shawn Mendes" person on the scrap heap, while we're at it.

I love the "let's be.." threads and the "tasteful friends" threads.

Anything and everything trans. If I never hear about this topic again for the rest of my life, it will still be too soon.

[quote] Muh both sides

R27 No. Pro trans thread do not exist on the DL, and any passing mention of trans gets the usual crazies going.

If the topic has a trans person, no matter how removed from the actual conversation they are, the thread its immediatly derailed by transphobic comments and people that sound very much like deplorables (COUGHrescuechickCOUGH).

So do fuck off with the both sides shit.

Meghan and Harry. Demented Frau havens.

Those Joe Locke and Bash whatever he’s called threads.

R32= See R27.

YOU are the other side Dear. Not everyone is "transphobic" every time they disagree with you. But of course you felt compelled to champion the Trans cause even though no one made a negative comment yet. I pointed out both sides need to shut the fuck up and you were the first loon to have a meltdown.

It is amazing how often Trump shows up in every thread. You can have a thread about how to cook rice and someone will bring up Trump. You can have a thread about hairstyles and you bet your ass someone will be there to complain about Trump. You can talk about a god damned hurricane and someone will make it about Trump.

Will you please let him wither and die?

R34 You could've engaged with the points I made but insted you decide to call me a loon and accused of having a "meltdown". But yeah, both sides, sure.

R34 Interesting post history by the way.

[quote]You can have a thread about hairstyles and you bet your ass someone will be there to complain about Trump. You can talk about a god damned hurricane and someone will make it about Trump.

Well to be fair, he has a freaky comb over transplant. You cant miss it. And he did make a spectacle of himself on TV drawing a black line on a map to push his agenda about where a hurricane was going to hit even though he was totally wrong.

Maybe if he would shut up and go away other people would stop responding to him.

I’m done with anyone who replies as Lizsha.

However, I still savor a well-timed “I like blue.”

Good "Let's be" threads are a definite highlight of DL for me.

The New York Post/Rupert Murdoch SUFFOCATION of the once free and proud Datalounge

I am done with the "corn" jokes.

Are you the scat Troll? WTF?

Race-baiting threads

The British Royals. I’ve had sufficient.

Besides, my husband was the biggest QUEEN of all.

Belinda Carlisle.

Not a topic, per se, but Helen Lawson and Darfur Orphan replies. Funny once.

Agreeing with above, on caftains and earrings.

The breathless threads about teen TV shows or twink influencers give me a lot of secondhand embarrassment. I hate even sharing a website with grown men who are that tasteless and weird.

Any thread that begins with a link to the NYPost

Trump

Let's Be

Monitor/Thought Nazis threads whinging endlessly about posters who don't goose step to their worldview.

Hillary Two-Time Loser Clinton

Tread closed at R2.

As of right now:

Viola Davis threads. We get it sweeties, you dont like Viola Davis or any movies she's in. No need to start 100 threads.

Don't Worry Darling - Way too much discussion of that DOA movie.

BRF

Another for BRF. I can't believe OP left it off the poll. He most be one of the royalist loonies who've taken over since that old bitch Lizzie dropped dead.

Not thread topics but still too present in being off-topic for the threads in which they appear: Vocabulary gatekeeping (of the " [italic] gasp! [/italic] No one has said that since the Franklin Pierce administration" sort), and barstool grammar Nazis (of the " [italic] gasp! [/italic] You shouldn't end a sentence with a preposition" sort). We hotsy-totsies who done got our ejjicashun 'n' degrees in the related fields, and so who arguably know a thing or two about the subject, rarely subscribe to the strictures these posters lay down (or "down which these posters lay," if you prefer).

Madonna

ending questions with prepositions

Of which DL topic are you tired, r56/pedant?

Meagan Markle. I just don’t get the obsession.

being called a pedant

I agree r21, someone really killed the Let's Be threads a few years ago by spamming us with a few of them a day for weeks on end. Also, no one is funny around here anymore, and the few who try to be funny just yell a lot. "Let's Be ketchup which is made with HFCS and why everyone is OBESE and SICK all the time! Because they eat crap! Hahah I'm hilarious!"

I'm surprised anyone still likes those threads.

Let's be bitchy DLers.

I'll start.

[quote]Vocabulary gatekeeping (of the " gasp! No one has said that since the Franklin Pierce administration" sort)

Actually, this is a good point. There are topics I'm tired of, but there are also comments I'm tired of, because it really seems like a bunch of new people showed up, learned one or two memes and then repeated them constantly, thinking it made them fit in. The "oh dears" and complaints about slang and grammar Nazi comments are the worst of these.

Not a fan of the moron who posts nothing but "there's already a thread on this, did you even think to look?" when there is no other thread, or "you like to make up stories." He posts one of those two things all the time, to the point that I think he might be using a script to automatically post on random threads. I imagine he thinks he's the wittiest chap on the board.

*buys R1 a beer*

The Ben Barnes, Henry Cahill, Sam what’s his name from Outlander endless threads and similar others that review in detail the boring lives of these closet cases. Some speculation is of course natural but there are limits. I only hope they come out so, like others in the past, the interest disappears overnight.

scapegoating all things gay male

r34 they usually are homophobic, tho. tired frau extremists posing as lesbians but anti-nutloaf. for them all things lead back to gay men, their sworn enemy... even the religious reich takes a break now and again.

read up on their theories to spot the trolls that all share the same language like the cult they are:

ROYAL FAMILY threads. I think there should just be one at a time, maybe.

There are small bands of posters (5-10) who post incessantly (and I mean many times a day) about one or two topics. The constant, obsessive, multiple posts about anything on the poll list pushes other threads about different topics out of view. It's truly an example of the patients running the asylum. I don't think these are bots because, well, I'm not insane. I think these are just shut-ins with no other human contact other than to yell at delivery people, and are in desperate need of aggressive psychological treatment. This would be truest for obsessives posting hourly about Markle, Trump, Madonna, and Trans.

If you are tired of Trump then get the fuck out of here and go to some conservative gay website.

R70 - And the crazy train rolls in. Did you tip the poor guy delivering your 3 big macs breakfast from McD's? Did you shower today?

[quote]some conservative gay website.

That's what DL feels like these days r70

Anything labeled with "Froy", whoever that is... I've looked up the answer to that before but because the answer was of no interest to me, I've forgotten his name in the interim. Yawn...

And because it's spelled similarly, anything to do with "Fraus", as in terms of them posting here, etc.

The daily Froy bullshit.

The constant anti-Trans, anti-woke threads.

[quote]This would be truest for obsessives posting hourly about Markle, Trump, Madonna, and Trans.

It's a tie, but I voted for Trump. r70, why in the name of dick-all would those of us who are sick to death of Trump go to a conservative gay website? What disordered thinking.

Harry and Meghan, no contest.

That reminds me, yesterday there was a thread on Prince George being a little scamp, and it got deleted for some reason, yet about four Harry & Meghan threads were left untouched. That was weird.

Just block and move on, OP. Did you really find the need to create a thread about this?

Oh well, I guess this is the very definition of 'pointless bitchery'.

"I'm tired of hearing about Trump" = MAGAts and other conservatives trying to change the topic to anything but their dumpster fire god-king.

I'll stop commenting about Trump when he either goes to prison or dies. I'd find either outcome acceptable.

R78, that was either because it was about a kid or the MM haters reported it. As much as they hate Markle, they love the W&K.

That simply is not true, r80. But you console yourself with that limited thinking.

Oh okay, R83, you're probably right. I'm sure people exist with such massive privilege and general shallowness that they can "opt out of" discussing the Hitler of our time. You'd fit right in with the "good Germans" who didn't question the political situation and would rather discuss other things while their country went to hell and people's rights were chipped away until they had no rights at all. That only happens to "those people," and in the words of Cuntess Supreme Barbara Bush, why should you bother your beautiful mind about it?

Also, JKR specific anti-trans threads.

Harry and Meghan/BRF-those cunts all need to fuck off to a frau royal gossip site.

Z-list twink du jour threads. No fucking clue who Froy or Shawn Mendez are and don't care.

We have Murder, She Wrote threads? Betty Bacall? None of this is happening.

OP, where is Royal Family threads?

Right now, nincompoop @ r84, I'm paying more attention to the evil that might become governor of PA, Doug Mastriano. We did get a little good news today about his Democratic opponent, Josh Shapiro, however. You're welcome to watch and read it. That is, if you can remove your cranium from Trump's rectum for a couple of minutes.

[quote]OP, where is Royal Family threads?

All over DL. I think you mean "where are".

R88, if you're politically engaged, why are you mocking political discussion or quelling discussion of current events?

What a weird one you are. And no one under 85 says "nincompoop" with a straight face.

PS: I live in PA.

Because, r90, I am So Fucking Sick of looking at that man's face.

And yes, do go ahead and mock my age while trying to make the case that you're such an evolved member of the citizenry.

The constant pro-trans, pro-woke threads.

The BRF threads will get worse. A popular forum thread was removed to members only viewing this week. It used to get millions of views. The members talk about Datalounge, mumsnet and Quora and using Twitter to direct pro brf traffic to these sites. It got removed because advertisers using Google adsense became aware of all the death threats.

[quote]Z-list twink du jour threads.

New rule: Z-list twink du jour threads must have a shirtless (at least) pic included with the OP or it will be deleted.

R32 In reality all tranny threads are deleted by Muriel because Mediaopolis is in bed with GLAAD, So fuck off ya mental enabling dick fritter.

R92, all one of them?

Gays in... any shit.

DOOL crap.

I think every member of the BRF out to third cousins needs their own thread

Belinda Carlisle

R98 = Kathy Valentine

Soap operas. It's 2022. I don't know a single person who still watches soap operas.

Now you do, r100.

R84 Trump is no longer in office. I hope he gets convicted but 6 years of listening to him and about him is too much. I threw him out of my head the minute he left office, I hated him so much and didn't want to think about him ever again. I think people who bring him up all the time are addicted to getting angry all the time because their lives are boring.

R93, is that how they all came over here from that thread? The BRF used to only be discussed periodically like when something happened. These are definitely hardcore people who seem to think this is a British site for the Royal family. Actually it seems more like a MM hate site these days.

R101, I don't know you, and it's creepy that you think I do.

The MM haters and the loony BRF stans are the same. A venn diagram would show a perfect circle.

We have been invaded by royalists who are largely conservative, racist, and homophobic. On the other hand we've long been inundated with conservative trolls, and a lot of them are probably royalists by default, so it's not all MM loonies but often garden variety Nazi types who came for the MAGA trolling but stayed for the MM hate threads and Lizzie's prolonged decline and death-circle jerk.

I am annoyed by the silly threads about British football player Grealish (btw. a cute guy) where one gsy fetishizing fraulein and few crazy queens are writing about said football player as a voracious bottom with various fellow football players in spite of the fact that said footballer is a completely straight dudebro and there have never been evidence about anything else.

They remind me of equally crazy Charmies that are gay fetishizing two male actors co stars in a gsy romance movie Cmbyn in spite of the fact that one of the actors had wife and kids and harem of mistresses.

R78 If you would use your brain a little you could figure out that the thread about Prince George was deleted cause it was bashing 9 years old kid, while there is no need for such protection of two 40 yo attention whores.

MARY!!!!! r104

[quote] BRF threads will get worse. A popular forum thread was removed to members only viewing this week. It used to get millions of views. The members talk about Datalounge, mumsnet and Quora and using Twitter to direct pro brf traffic to these sites. It got removed because advertisers using Google adsense became aware of all the death threats.

You really couldn't make this up.

[quote] Soap operas. It's 2022. I don't know a single person who still watches soap operas.

I’ve never watched soaps, but I find the existence of these threads wholesome and nostalgic. I like that in 2022 there are still people out there watching them (and folding laundry, like my friend’s mom used to do after school).

Someone named "Froy" apparently. Another named "Joe Locke." And Robert Sepulveda, whoever that is.

I'm always seeing names here discussed breathlessly by their respective obsessives that I never hear in the real world, in normal conversations, or with gay people I know personally. There are many others besides the 3 I mentioned.

[quote] I am annoyed by the silly threads about British football player Grealish (btw. a cute guy) where one fraulein and few crazy queens are writing about said football player as a voracious bottom with various fellow football players in spite of the fact that said footballer is a completely straight dudebro and there have never been evidence about anything else.

Well, R106, it took over a hundred replies for anyone to mention it, and you seem to be the only one with a major problem (at least, so far). Perhaps it's only you who's got a problem? Those threads are tiny, and as you say only a handful of us post and partake (with great fun and enjoyment), so it's hardly spamming behaviour when it's only little thread series all on its own that is easily ignored or skipped over. Compare to the literal dozens of carbon-copy threads started in the same week on month on the topics OP listed--usually without the detail and humour found in ours--about which many posters have complained, here and in other threads. No comparison, mate, is there?

Also? The premise that you find so offensive and beyond the pale is in fact *A JOKE*. It's a meme, a roleplay thread, just silly smutty nonsense that we do for a laugh. Perhaps you don't get it, and that's what upsets you? It's literally nothing to get agitated about. If anything, one could see it as a kind of a satire on those older thread series from years ago, ones about straight athletes or actors who were likewise heavily sexualised or fetishised or turned into cultural tulpas by the general public. Maybe looking at it that way will help you settle down a bit and stop taking it so much to heart.

Not to mention it's a fairly ubiquitous observation we're making about Jack, in any event. Pop over to Twitter, YouTube, tumblr, then type in his name, have a cheeky scan of the top posts. and you'll see posters saying the same sorts of things about Jack--that he's a slut, he flirts too much with everyone, he's an exhibitionist, he relies on his looks and charm to compensate for lack of basic intelligence, etc. There may not be 'evidence' of the compelling sort you seem so desperately to want that will support these views (of which, again, many are in jest), but suffice it to say that a lot of people have noticed certain traits, and people being people, conclusions are jumped to and obvious jibes are made. We ain't the first.

And fyi, if you knew exactly how much obscene dirty surplus money someone like Jack Grealish makes (hint: +£300k a WEEK) and how famous he is, then consider how much privilege that affords him, you'd realise that he doesn't give a fuck what shite some random pedestrian cubebound gays in obscurity might chat about his sexuality, and that he really doesn't require the services of internet white-knights to defend his sexual integrity. He's fine, and I bet if he had a read of our threads on him, he'd laugh and shrug his shoulders.

R106 > r112

I tired how beeg mine pussee is.

I only say beeg enuff (sp?) and like kangaru I did keep Barron Dear in it for nein monthses.

I’m really beginning to despise British posters. They’re insufferable bores. Muriel needs to ban them all.

[quote] Just block and move on, OP.

Funny you should mention this, R79. There's a lot of "missing" posts in this thread for me. I imagine the Markle/Trump/Madonna/Trans -obsessed community if furiously typing away.

Trump Trump Trump. But there seem to be just three accounts fixated on him. Block them and this site suddenly becomes pre-Trump again.

R112 Well, if Grealish makes all that money I will marry him.

But then I would break the balls of anyone who call him a slut.

Not so much thread topics as reply people. The Klan Grannies (i'm sure it's like 4-5 people) who obsess pornographically about trans surgery and black crime and immigrant infestation.

My guess is they're English and they're the ones who think Liz Truss is great.

R116 I've got missing posts too. I'm putting down to the Markle hating loons.

I'll never understand the people who whip themselves up into a fury over Markle, assuming they KNOW just KNOW what she's REALLY thinking. It's weird.

R119 idiot accusing others of being racist anti-transers and then exposes herself/himself as xenophobic piece of shit.

Yeah r121 that shit is seriously crazy.

My God are you fraus at R121 and R123 tiresome. Oh, poor royal Harry and Meghan, how will they survive if some DLers don't love them.

Any topic where the OP links to the fucking New York Post.

[quote]All over DL. I think you mean "where are".

No - where IS the Royal Families threads choice?

R106 Those threads annoy me too! So toe-curlingly cringe. And you're right that it's a straight woman who is doing it. When she talks about things like getting 'Aldi mascara' she gives it away.

No one's expecting to love them, R124, but ppl who get infuriated at them over some rumor that can't possibly every be confirmed are just sad.

I have never had a clue what Designing Women is. Is it a comedy or a drama? A. Dramedy? I love Jean Smart, but I have never heard of any of the others in it. I don’t feel the need to know either.

I often have little clue about the old movies, and I’ve never seen one with the Pepsi saleswoman in it.

R88 Josh Shapiro is hot AF!!! I would get down and suck him dry if I could!

I can't even see r124 but from r128's response I can tell it's one of the megloons displaying why we think they are batshit.

Royal obsessed frau ar R131 shows that she really knows how to make a conclusion on post she "can't read"

Really, where are the Sussexes?

[quote] The constant pro-trans, pro-woke threads.

Link?

That fugly British Netflix twink that some weirdo here is obsessed with.

Also, apparently Betty White and Bea Arthur fought to the death. It must have been a horrific bloody battle considering how often it appears in my feed.

Can we take a moment to APPRECIATE that we’re no longer deluged with Lee Pace, Tom Hiddelston or the Supernatural tv show?!🙏🏻

The Oscar threads. Who didn’t win the award for Best Supporting Frau in a Musical in 1938, and why it’s an outrage. Which long-forgotten thespian won for the wrong performance but didn’t win for the right performance three years later. M and G. I quite like that there are eldergays still alive to pass this knowledge on, but I could be less interested 95% of the time.

Should have had an “other” choice.

The Oh Dear Queens.

Who elected you to be hall monitor of an anonymous gay bitch site? No one is here to discus literature. No one asked for you to correct them. In fact doing so without an invite is quite rude and a bigger faux pas than spelling errors. So please do fuck off and I hope everyone shits in your mouth next time you open it.

[quote]discus

Oh, DEAR…

I like the literature discussions, actually.

I like to learn stuff. Oh, dear me!

the sebastian croft creature. you would think he's the lead of the netflix show he's on with how many threads he has. he has 10 lines max.

If we banned everything that has been nominated on this thread, there would be almost nothing left.

It is so fascinating to me Dataloungers consistently think everything should be according to their own interests, and no other thread should exist if they personally are not interested in it.

"[italic]Chacun à mon goût.[/italic]"

R144 No, I think that there should be fewer threads about some subjects. For example I would be fine with one general Meghan and Harry thread at a time. Just not dozens of them?

The level of hatred for Lauren Bacall has been a surprise.

Okay, I get it, she was kind of a bitch.

You're not have breakfast with the woman.

Laverne and Shirley threads are the worst!

[quote]I like to learn stuff. Oh, dear me!

From the DL ??? OH FUCKING DEAR!

Try city college, Dear.

So basically all of our standard, daily topics? 🤣🤣🤣

R136 Yes! And it does seem DL has finally lost interest in posting tens of thousands of pointless comments about Connor Jessup and his now ex, never thought I would see the day. I do suspect these Twitter/Insta obsessives may have moved on to the half dozen Heartstopper actor threads active at any given time, however...

It does seem we are still periodically afflicted by the idiot who starts the 'Niall Horan is Fat!' threads over and over, more than 15 times now, and who then entirely populates those threads himself.

R150, the "Niall Horan is Fat" threads are the creepiest things I've seen. It is so obvious one person is playing at being a group of people - the use of identical phrases and sentence structure - and then the primary target of these threads (someone who maintains a fan-page for the singer) is so innocuous that the level of hate for her is staggering. So she likes a basic-bitch boys' band and might have a few extra pounds on her frame. You'd think she was pitchforking kittens into a prison-rape-making machine.

[quote] If we banned everything that has been nominated on this thread

R144 Go back and read the thread topic. S L O W L Y. Where do you see the word "ban"?

The author of the Niall Horan Is Fat threads also likes to call everyone Klan Grannies.

The Butterballs Troll is also the Larry Troll/Spaz Troll.

R151 Whoever that clearly ill obsessive-compulsive fool may be, he is living a sad fucking life. Pity he seems compelled to share it with us.

For what it's worth, I exchanged hellos with Niall H in passing at an album release party a few years back -- he weighed probably 165 lb and so was absolutely nothing like 'fat'.

I started the the thread a few weeks ago imploring the idiot(s) who start all the numerous Sebastian Croft/Joe Locke threads to (FOR THE LOVE OF ALL THAT IS HOLY) STOP starting thread after thread about whoever these nobodies are. So those are my votes, along with whoever the fuck "Froy" is. This is not your personal erotica site. Stop foisting these 3 on us!!

[quote] [R144] Go back and read the thread topic. S L O W L Y. Where do you see the word "ban"?

Where do you see that I said you had?

If a topic bothers people that much, why not just scroll past? Not that hard to do.

r158 it would be fine if there was one thread we could scroll past - it's just the repetitiveness and multiple threads that really get to me. Over and over again, new threads started about stupid nobodies that only one or two people really care about.

[quote] Where do you see that I said you had?

R144 R157 Oh. Reading comprehension problems. Never mind.

MADONNA MADONNA MADONNA MADONNA MADONNA MADONNA MADONNA MADONNA MADONNA MADONNA MADONNA MADONNA MADONNA MADONNA

The "good looks" troll or whatever you want to call him.

A number of us have had dealings with Bacall so we can bitch about her all we like.

The posters in threads about Heartstopper actors are predominantly girls, you can see by the conversation they have there, not creepy old gay men.

Guys, no one is talking about banning topics, and we know we can scroll past a thread we don't like. WE KNOW. We're not talking about ***one*** thread on any of these topics. These are topics that should be able to be discussed by the factions who enjoy the, within ONE thread, but instead we are inundated with multiple threads started daily, sometimes 5 or more threads started in one day, all to discuss the same obscure supporting player on a Netflix show that 7 people here even watch. We don't need 5 new threads a day to discuss the latest MM rumors, separate from the three threads about Camilla and the 7 threads about Charles and 5 about the dead Queen and an entire thread just for the Queen's jewelry.

It!s fucking madness! I mean it's literal mental illness. These posters are obsessed and they take over the board when they're on a tear.

And NONE of these topics are gay. None. They're bullshit P.R. news releases about obscure pop culture figures no one else has heard of or they reflect the obsessions of a tiny minority of posters, like the BRF stans.

Stop with the stupid "yOu CaN jUsT sCrOlL pAsT tHrEaDs" comments and stop claiming this thread is calling for censorship.

No more Sydney Sweeney and Zendaya. Or Madonna. Please.

Agreed ^^

R144 I don't think anyone believes that but coming how many threads does one need on brf/Markle? I've always skipped over soap and Broadway threads but when you are having your entire feed taken up with one subject it's disturbing, to say the least.

[quote] No more Sydney Sweeney and Zendaya. Or Madonna.

Madonna would probably be thrilled to be included in a trifecta that includes two 25-year-oldish It girls.

Meghan and Harry hatred threads.

The monarchy - and not just the British monarchy. Though at least the British monarchy is popular. Who cares about the monarchs of those other countries?

[quote]And NONE of these topics are gay. None.

Who are you to define for the rest of us what constitutes a gay topic? And anyway, can't gay people discuss any topic? Why are we limited to "gay topics"?

I do r171. Speaking for myself. I’m sick of the BRF. YMMV.

R173 Thanks, I wasn't actually asking who cares about them, I meant I don't care.. I just answered the question. That's what the thread is about - our opinions.

I concur about any monarchy bullshit. Right now we have 2 active threads with over 100 posts about the stupid Queen of Denmark stripping four grandchildren of titles. The title of the threads is almost word for word, except one actually has the Queen's name and country in it.

Why? Why do we care? And why do we have TWO threads that are virtual duplicates down to the title?

R168, the worst thing about the Markle loons is that they don't just start multiple threads about her, their pathological hatred even infects threads that have nothing to do with her or any member of the British royal family.

Most of the crazies leave the rest of us alone. They don't bring up Ben Barnes or the Heartstopper twinks in random threads. Only the Markle loons do. You could have a thread about anything from birdwatching to the Peloponnessian War and those lunatics would find a way to work a Meghan reference into it.

The "straight down the shitter" troll who always tries

to make those happen can die in a grease fire.

The "Mighty Joe Biden" threads.

Yes the "Mighty Joe" moron needs to go away.

You retarded fraus, instead crying about poor rich royal Harry and Meghan not being admired by every single DLer should better care about Middle eastern refugees bsnnished from their countrirs destroyed to pieces by US troops

stupid shallow star struck fraus dying to suck royal Harry's ginger dick, but he won't let you, cause you are ugly like dogs

At this point, I'm tired not only of BRF/Markle threads, but also of everyone bitching about them. If you just don't give them any more oxygen, they'll die off.

That's ridiculous 'both sides' nonsense, R182, and you know it.

Do you use both side theory about the Middle eastern victims of American oil wars or just when you post pathetic shit about royal bimbos?

Short list: Viola Davis, Madonna, anything beyond "LGB" in the alphabet soup

Shorter list: I'm just over The Datalounge in general. I don't even know why I'm here.

False R182. I've blocked posters and and this shit still keeps popping up.

Easily the most disgusting are the trans troll posts. Pure dehumanization and bigotry.

Wow, even the thread on DL topics you’re sick of has resulted in a bunch Harry and Meghan posts.

R186 sockpuppets…pure and simple.

Another obscurity that the DL obsessives think we care about: "Sebastian Croft."

I know. "Who??!?!?" Never heard of him, but there's a new thread daily it seems.

Whatever the fuck a "Seacow" is.

Timothee…please stop.

I agree about the Seacow stuff. I don’t know if that’s an actual person, but the troll who trolls him and posts pics is super annoying. Also, the person posting anniversaries of old show premieres.

Do we really need a new Ezra Miller thread every day?

I'm definitely tired of the 'woke' complaining in every thread. Whenever I see someone even use that word, it's clear what their agenda is. Same with inserting some complaint about 'trans' into every conversation, which usually has nothing to do with what's being discussed. I could do with less politics, royals, and Harry and Meghan, though.

But I'm always down for the "twink du jour" threads.🤣 I mean, it's DL, we're gay, and celeb gossip is what brought me here (and what the site used to be mostly about. I miss when we used to get really good dish from industry pros). And what I like about DL is that we can say pretty much whatever we want. It's not a crime to have a (reasonable) dissenting opinion....whereas at most other celeb/gay gossip boards, if you don't worship at the alter of the celeb in question, they rip you to shreds. Thank god for DL on that matter. 🤣

But I definitely agree with wishing we could keep topics in one thread only, until full, and then start a new one. We don't need 4 to 5 threads on the same topic and at the same time. It makes me feel scatterbrained when something you want to discuss is all over the place. It's really not that hard to use the search function, and see what's the latest active thread on a topic.

Why are there so many obsessive posts about Andrew Neighbors and Nick Topel? Still don’t know why I should care even after googling them.. His similar name always makes me think of those Topol toothpaste ads from the early 80s with the nasty stains.

Not a topic, but a class of poster: the accusers annoy the absolute fuck out of me. We have the Boris accusers, the Defuckto accusers, the Davida accusers, the anti-trans loon accusers, the pro-trans loon accusers, the “you’re a Republican” accusers, the right wing accusers.

We even have a new, and particularly annoying accuser: the one who accuses those who don't want to read about Trump, or look at his atrocious visage of being Trump fans. Quelle stupide.

But no one is more annoying than the troll who accuses reply 495 of posting the same thing reply 4 posted, as in "reply 495, see reply 4." All you’re doing, you undereducated ninny, is repeating the thing that annoys you, causing us to have to read it a third time.

I'm tired of threads about guys with freaky weight lifter bodies, but I don't really care if I have to skip over them. Also, Tasteful Friends threads don't interest me.

[Quote]I agree about the Seacow stuff. I don’t know if that’s an actual person, but the troll who trolls him and posts pics is super annoying. Also, the person posting anniversaries of old show premieres.

That would be the Seacow posting those show premiere anniversary threads.

The weirdest part of the show anniversaries is that half the time it's some random number. Like the recent thread on Felicity having premiered 24 years ago. First, I get it, no one gives fuck. Not even Keri Russell. But more to the point, why 24? How fucking weird is that?

Why is R112 saying "we" when she writes 75%+ of the posts in the Jack Grealish threads? Can we add multiple personality disorder to the LONG list of mental disorders that she's already diagnosed herself with?

[quote]I'm just over The Datalounge in general. I don't even know why I'm here.

Move it along, toots!

Random, r200? I’d say these anniversary numbers are excruciatingly specific.

Who is Sebastian Croft? I don't have any idea.

Not sure R24 and I don't care. I skip over all the unknown twink threads as well as all the other nonentities from tik tok and IG.

I actually don't skip all those threads, I like some of those guys, but I still don't know who this is.

For the love of God, no more BROS threads. Every queen who sees it starts a new thread to discuss the same things over and over again. Like someone said its like dealing an Alzheimer's patients 😑

R201 stalking is both criminal and a sign of personality-disordered behaviour....js :/

Most of the celebrities discussed on DL are reality or porn stars.

The endless threads in which the OP just posts a link to some random social media slut or pornstar, whether it's on Instagram, OnlyFans or TikTok kill me.

Half the time I think the poster is a marketer and half the time I wonder if they're just a horny idiot who is spreading the gospel of yet another naked bodybuilder dude in his 20s raking in cash from naked idiots online.

No, r210. They are a seacow.

Threads about PooShoes.

R212 must be Poo because no one really starts threads about it as the star. I'm sure it would love it though.