Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Meghan!

What is it about this breath of fresh air that causes so many people who have absolutely nothing to do with her and dont know her at all to form such strong opinions?

by Anonymousreply 60December 23, 2023 1:08 AM

Because there's no there there yet she always is.

by Anonymousreply 1August 23, 2022 7:10 PM

Melanin.

by Anonymousreply 2August 23, 2022 7:13 PM

The sick obsessives ruin it for everyone else who would have lighthearted fun mocking how silly and shallow she and Harry are.

by Anonymousreply 3August 23, 2022 7:16 PM

She’s a real cunt, that’s why.

by Anonymousreply 4August 23, 2022 7:22 PM

She's like Trump. You can't get rid of her and she has all the sincerity of an insect. Like a mosquito buzzing around your head when you're trying to sleep and won't leave you alone. At least she's pretty.

by Anonymousreply 5August 23, 2022 7:40 PM

"Hey! It's me! I'm just excited to be myself and talk [and talk and talk and talk and talk]!"

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 6August 23, 2022 7:40 PM

Oh honey, I'm afraid we do know the real you.

by Anonymousreply 7August 23, 2022 7:44 PM

No, she's no where near as dangerous as Dump.

by Anonymousreply 8August 23, 2022 7:46 PM

No of course she's not dangerous like Trump but she insists on getting herself in the news under any circumstances and you wish she would go away forever.

by Anonymousreply 9August 23, 2022 8:17 PM

Cunting cunt.

by Anonymousreply 10August 23, 2022 8:18 PM

It’s best to stay out of those threads and not respond. Those folks are like Trumpers. Blinded by their racism, entitlement and fear or paid to spread an agenda.

by Anonymousreply 11August 23, 2022 8:52 PM

The only racists here are the Markle supporters, r11.

Everyone else is judging her on the content of her character. Only the Markle supporters judge her by the colour of her skin.

by Anonymousreply 12August 23, 2022 9:15 PM

Nasty piece of work , that bitch....

by Anonymousreply 13August 23, 2022 9:37 PM

I never hear about her R9 except here. What kind of garbage rags are you watching and reading?

by Anonymousreply 14August 23, 2022 9:57 PM

R14 Datalounge. Just like you.

by Anonymousreply 15August 23, 2022 10:21 PM

The only reason she's on DL is due to the royal obsessed frau cows who migrated here R15. God only knows where they get this shit from.

by Anonymousreply 16August 23, 2022 10:56 PM

OP thank goodness you have finally broached this greatly-neglected topic, you pot-stirring racist piece of shit.

by Anonymousreply 17August 23, 2022 10:58 PM

Meg Markle is not pretty absent extensive photoshop and filters.

by Anonymousreply 18August 23, 2022 11:03 PM

She's gossip and a joke, R16. We shoudl ignore her? Of course she's here. Christ, primary threads right now include erudite discussions such as:

Asher Angel - Who's had him?

Circumcision: How do we stop it?

Vintage Beef: Chris Atkins in "A Night in Heaven"

and the vital: why do they rarely have hot men on golden girls?

It isn't fraus. It's visibility.

by Anonymousreply 19August 23, 2022 11:06 PM

If you grew up in upper middle class Southern California you probably knew lots of Meghan Markles of every race, religion, etc. Spoiled little fake do-gooder LA brat Angelina Jolie wannabe who is nice to you if she thinks you can do something for you but will throw you under the bus faster than you can say “fake as fuck”

by Anonymousreply 20August 23, 2022 11:35 PM

As a matter of fact, OP, I have written a book about her, which may answer your question.

by Anonymousreply 21August 23, 2022 11:50 PM

There are many famous cunts in Hollywood just as cunty as Meghan Markle, but she’s the most famous because she married an intellectually challenged royal.

Someone posted a story about how nasty and cunting ZsaZsa Gabor was. The whole time I read it, I was thinking that Meghan behaves the same way.

by Anonymousreply 22August 23, 2022 11:52 PM

Link, r22?

by Anonymousreply 23August 23, 2022 11:54 PM

R14, she was trending on Twitter because of her new podcast. The reactions were mixed, much like we see here.

by Anonymousreply 24August 24, 2022 12:03 AM

The name sounds like 'Eggin'.

It's ugly.

by Anonymousreply 25August 24, 2022 12:09 AM

R23, here ya go. One man’s account.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 26August 24, 2022 12:11 AM

Thanks very much, r26.

by Anonymousreply 27August 24, 2022 12:37 AM

Dear me, Pet, let me think about that for a moment . . .

The 41 year old "breath of fresh air" perjued herself in court so the public wouldn't know she colluded in Scabies' comical book about her, bleats about climate change but lives in an environmental disaster of a home, treats people she doesn't need any longer like garbage, lied about quite a few things on Oprah in order to hurt people who'd put her on the global map, had her pal Omid talking about the wreath she sent at Philip's funeral whilst other people were focused on the lonely, tiny figure of the widow saying goodbye to her husband of 73 years, and recently made her husband look like a castrated eunuch at the UN.

She's married to a man obsessed with destroying his family, and who is currently trying to get the UK taxpayer to shoulder huge financial costs for his "security", as he knows full well that the government can't set a precedent for rich individuals to hire public services for themselves, so that means, if he were to claw that security back . . . the taxpayers would have to pay for it . . . all while he screams about how he's going to fight to his last breath for a more equal world for Lilibet to grow up in . . .

Just not too equal.

Pathologically self-absorbed, obsessed with her own status (she wouldn't even let the title of her "book" on the spine: all the spine said was MEGHAN THE DUCHESS OF SUSSEX - JHC, even War and Peace has the author's name farther down the spine!), still lying about the Proctor & Gamble story that resulted in a letter from Hillary Clinton that her father said she never got and that she can never produce . . .

You know, they called Diana and then Fergie breaths of fresh air. And we know how well those stories ended.

She's a stale 41 year old, not a fresh young ingenue. She's still peddling her delusions of grandeur, she's still telling lies, and she's still acting as if, instead of grabbing the gold ring and ending up far richer and more famous than she would have if the British Royal Family hadn't let her in, she's the world's greatest victim.

Yeah, right, the melanin (what there is of it - you can barely see it unless you look really hard), it's the melanin.

It's not the lies, the grandstanding, the ruthless pursuit of celebrity, the cheap values, the ridiculous clothes that never fit, the posturing, and did we mention the lies? You know, like, to an English court, which drily memorialised her perjury as "at best, an unfortunate lapse of memory . . .")

She's not a breath of fresh air: she's a middle-aged stale golddigger of the sort we've seen a dozen or more times in literature (think Becky Sharp in Vanity Fair) and films.

Did I forget the lies? You know, the 17 verified lies she told on Oprah? Her bottom feeder of a mouthpiece, Omid Scobie?

by Anonymousreply 28August 24, 2022 12:38 AM

R12 for the win.

by Anonymousreply 29August 24, 2022 12:41 AM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 30August 24, 2022 12:47 AM

Meghan flashing her cooch at Serena's husband at the tennis - Ohanian is worth quite a bit more than Harry.

Serena herself posted this photo. Why she's chosen to forget the incident is best known to herself. Maybe she's getting rid of Ohanian, anyway (there have been some serious rumours about that), or maybe she figures that with tennis behind her, she has to carve out a new niche and her pal Meghan can grease the way . . .

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 31August 24, 2022 12:55 AM

The Telegraph. Merciless.

Even the DM and DE are finding it hard to say anything good about it. Only the Squaddies.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 32August 24, 2022 1:01 AM

I don't pay attention to twitter R24.

by Anonymousreply 33August 24, 2022 3:37 AM

Even the usually more restrained TIMES has skewered the podcast. Hilary Rose lays it on the line in her column's heading: "I listened to Megha's podcast so you don't have to".

Except for people who would rather face a firing squad than publicly criticise Meghan!, the rest of the world is jeering at the programmer's maniacal egoism , staggering lack of genuine insight, endless self'referentiality, and obscene fee.

One hopes Spotify is suitably embarrassed.

$18 million for this?! Join the illustrious crowd that includes Meghan's husbands, her father, the Queen, Prince Charles, and Netflix: you've been had.

by Anonymousreply 34August 24, 2022 11:01 AM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 35August 24, 2022 12:29 PM

To the Post Redacted Troll: it won't matter. They'll all link to it, read it, and nothing you can do will change the fact that the "putrid rag" is reporting the truth: Meghan Markle is a farce, and, as with that farce of a book she got to publish because of who she married, her podcast is getting the treatment is deserves . . .

As reported by that putrid rag, with screenshots of the other broadsheets' reviews.

I know it bites, but the DM is only reporting the truth here.

by Anonymousreply 36August 24, 2022 12:44 PM

R36, fyi, the "Post Redacted Troll" is Miss Muriel herself. There are several other British newspaper redacted like that, albeit using different wordings for each paper.

by Anonymousreply 37August 24, 2022 1:30 PM

Muriel does have a strange relationship with the British papers. I mean, nothing in America gets the block. But you get what you pay for.

by Anonymousreply 38August 24, 2022 1:37 PM

[quote] Meghan!

Cunt!

by Anonymousreply 39August 24, 2022 1:38 PM

If Meghan had “hit the ground running” right after they inked the Spotify deal in December 2020 (before the Oprah interview and Philip’s death), she might have had something. She dithered for nearly two years (it doesn’t take very much to make a podcast) and a whole lot happened in that time to erode their public goodwill.

by Anonymousreply 40August 24, 2022 5:24 PM

She would've had the good will of the people if she and Harry hadn't insisted on the fairytale wedding where she was prancing around like a fucking Disney princess with that tacky veil. If they had left the BRF prior to getting married (and if Harry had renounced his place in the line of succession, thereby being entirely 'free' in terms of allegiance), they could've really become a great success in the States.

by Anonymousreply 41August 24, 2022 5:44 PM

Largest bag fumble ever.

by Anonymousreply 42August 24, 2022 6:31 PM

The reviews of the Bower book on Amazon are overwhelmingly positive. It's still selling fantastically well. Bower nailed it.

One must have some sympathy for the Post Redacted Troll, hereinafter, the PRT, vainly trying to hold back the tidal wave of truth about Meghan. It's so easy to thwart: you simply put the link in one post, and the text of your comment on the next.

It never pays to try to stifle free speech. You always end up looking worse than whatever it is your trying to suppress.

by Anonymousreply 43August 25, 2022 10:36 AM

Ffs, R43, see R37.

by Anonymousreply 44August 25, 2022 11:08 AM

^*you're trying to suppress

Before I get Oh, deared.

by Anonymousreply 45August 25, 2022 11:32 AM

I just love it when Meghan's trolls come to a notorious gossip site and ask how we can form such strong opinions on someone we don't know.

Because, as even Martians know, except for Meghan!, DLers know every other celebrity, actor, politician, and artist about whom we also express strong opinions.

Fuck off, troll OP.

Meghan Markle lives to create drama. Don't complain to DL as she succeeds.

by Anonymousreply 46August 25, 2022 2:47 PM

To the Meghan trolls: how can you form such strong, defensive loyalty to someone you don't know? Serious, genuine question.

(I think she's one of the run of the mill worst people on offer right now. Criminal, no. Deplorable, absolutely. It's amusing to discuss and analyse her ham fisted, cluelessly obvious own goals. She is a joke. Her Energizer Bunny determination is making a fool of her. Her ambition was suited to a much smaller scale. Now she's just making an ass of herself. If she weren't married to who she married, I'd have no interest in her. But this lady tried to tame a beast way out of her league. What's [italic] not [/italic] to discuss?

Why do you feel the need to come here, which plainly is no friend to her, and do whatever it is you are trying to do, Meghan trolls? Second serious, genuine question. What exactly are you trying to accomplish? Because it's been a lot of years and, here, you've changed nothing. Why not stick to a site with your own kind?

by Anonymousreply 47August 25, 2022 4:56 PM

Boring. Cannot stand her and her dumb face. Don't care what race she's presenting as today. She clearly uses all things for gain.

by Anonymousreply 48August 25, 2022 5:35 PM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 49August 25, 2022 5:46 PM

^Mr Our Planet is Burning Windsor

by Anonymousreply 50August 25, 2022 5:47 PM

We should all be thankful that Harry has chosen to save the planet AND money by being ferried about in a $60,000 car.

by Anonymousreply 51August 25, 2022 6:28 PM

How do you head out for a polo match and forget your kit?

I’m so glad the DailyMail is holding his stupid ginger feet to the fire.

by Anonymousreply 52August 25, 2022 7:08 PM

[quote] What is it about this breath of fresh air that causes so many people who have absolutely nothing to do with her and dont know her at all to form such strong opinions?

It's unbelievably hypocritical of you to ask this on a gossip forum. Obviously you are here in the first place because you want to talk about celebrities and politicians who have absolutely nothing to do with you and whom you don't know at all.

You're a big phony, OP. We see right through you.

by Anonymousreply 53August 25, 2022 7:13 PM

Her stubborn lawsuit against the Mail will ensure that we have all the petty gossip we can handle, for years to come.

by Anonymousreply 54August 25, 2022 7:21 PM

Can you credit it?! He was on his way to a polo match, but forgot his polo kit.

Harry took Hop-A-Jet out of Santa Barbara - private jets available for hire.

by Anonymousreply 55August 26, 2022 12:48 PM

SS must be DESPERATE as hell ! Staring threads about how " wonderful" the POS megain is.

by Anonymousreply 56August 26, 2022 1:40 PM

r54 If they divorce the gossip will be treasure trove for years.

by Anonymousreply 57December 15, 2023 12:33 AM

You are a fucking cunt, Meghan, I know this is Meghan's account.

by Anonymousreply 58December 15, 2023 12:36 AM

Hooray for a breath of fresh air !

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 59December 15, 2023 1:04 AM

She is an evil cunt, that's why

by Anonymousreply 60December 23, 2023 1:08 AM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!