Buckle up, DL! Tom Bower’s book on Meghan and Harry out next week!

Just saw this on Twitter. Thought it was a fake link but the book was just released for preorder on several UK bookstores, including Amazon.

Weird, though, that there’s no news of its release. Just popped up on UK book sites.

I thought the book was a biography of Meghan, not a book on Harry and .Meghan and their feud with the Windsors.

I think this is a troll fake.

Zzzzzz

Well I'm excited.

It says "Available in 8 days!" (21 July - it's already 13 July in the UK as I type this)

Apparently there was a hashtag "PrinceHarryIsARacist" because Meghan hid her diamonds when she was in Africa, assuming they'd steal. So why not "Meghan is a racist" then? Did Harry have diamonds to hide?

I want a "Free Harry" hashtag to trend. People WOULD be interested in his interviews, articles, books, IF he was telling the story of the hell he's been living and what a complete fuck-up he has been since 2018 or whenever he hooked up with her and ignored his brother's (and likely father's) warnings.

It's your only way out, Haz!!!!!!! Everybody loves a repentent prodigal son!

[quote]R4 Meghan hid her diamonds when she was in Africa, assuming they'd steal.

Don’t all people do that when traveling, anywhere?

A search of the internet brings up not a thing.

No title, let alone one called REVENGE, no mocked up cover, nothing nada zero zilch.

The book is a biography of Meghan. The Suissez/Windsor shit has already been done by Tina Brown, Robert Lacey, Andrew Morron . . .

The Bower book is an in-depth bio of Meghan, just Meghan.

I'm calling bullshit on this with an easily done up mockup of a cover.

Not - one - single - solitary - mention - of - this - assertion - anywhere.

Oh, Lady C and Dylan Howard also did the Meghan Harry book thing.

Bower wouldn't be so stupid as to jump on that tired bandwagon as the last one on the train.

A search of Amazon: no Bower bio on Meghan, no Bpwer book on Meghan and Harry, no pre-order offer . .

You're full ofvshit, OP.

The question is: why? Why ho to all that trouble?

R5, they had a lot of security, plus people expect royals to wear jewels and put on a show.

R3 HAVE A GOD DAMN HEART ATTACK RIGHT NOW, THIS VERY MOMENT YOU READ THIS MESSAGE, YOU GOD DAMN BITCHING WHORE!

It's listed at Amazon.uk as well as Waterstones - for pre-order.

Be sure to go to the UK version of Amazon, R7. It's there for 22 GBP.

Trying the amazon link but it was too long and I cut the last half - may still work ??

Oh hell I screwed up but if you add this part on to the signature in R11 it should pop up

dp/1788705033/ref=sr_1_1?crid=GQ01AY5XT0RN&keywords=revenge+meghan&qid=1657678197&sprefix=revenge+meghan%2Caps%2C144&sr=8-1

Its available through book depisotory

^^ just preordered mine

R13 Sorry but the words "book depository" gives me horrific flashbacks of Dallas, TX in 1963.

I couldn't find it anywhere EXCEPT Waterstones.

Let me put it this way: if it IS legit, then I'm going to be very disappointed.

Like we on DL don't already know just about everything there is to know about what a psycho bitch Meghan is and what spilt vicious mental turd wipe Harry is.

We probably could have written the book if it's just another rehash of recent history.

I was looking for something along the lines of his other biographies, from childhood up. Yeah, we expected some juice from the bullying shit.

But ffs, another rehash of the lies, the Oprah shit, the titles, Megxit .

Ffs.

I'll end up flipping through the pages trying to find something Lacey, Brown, Morton, Lady CC, Dylan Howard., et all., haven't already put out there. Just the way I did with the Brown book, a waste of my proverbial hard-earned.

^Apologies to OP, it does appear to be legit, and I'm disgusted.

Crap it looks like every other dzmn book on them that's come out over the last two years.

It's just promising to be nastier and openly slanted against Meghan as far as he can get away with legally, not the proper, probing bio that was touted.

Even the sub-heading has the same tone as the other books.

Die in a grease fire, Bower. This looks like just another long tabloid article dressed up as a serious book.

The Brown book went easy on Meghan, so I think it's a good time to slam her down. Hopefully this book will do it. (I don't know about the others but didn't they predate some of the more recent shit - like Harry's interview about his meeting with the queen and her not having the right people around her? the photographers they took to request an official photo of the Queen and Lilibet and then them flying off in the middle of the Jubbly, apparently in a snit after the supposed birthday party wasn't attended by... oh you know - lots of shit since earlier books)

And I think the public has turned more against her (and even him, the "bellend" now)

I’m OP—stand down. Now I think this is fake. It’s on Amazon UK and sev other book sites but posters above are correct—there is no mention of it other than the pages on those sites. Very odd! Sorry to let you down, DL.

R16 is the sickest mofo DL has known.

One can preorder from Waterstones.

So, what does the title "Revenge" refer to?

1. Is it the revenge of people Harry's wife screwed over over the years who are now getting their chance to tell the tale? (Might we get the truth of any Northwestern or high school stories?)

2. Is it Harry's revenge against his family? And his brother for being born first?

3. Is it Harry's wife's revenge against the UK for not making her Diana 2.0?

4. Is it from Harry's wife's previous husband or husbands and how they were devalued and discarded?

Or what?

Inquiring minds want to know.

I thought they delayed the release of this book until end of year.

That's what has been posted multiple times here, r23, I wonder what's really going on.

You can buy it from book depository, hope it puts the smackdown on both of the gruesome twosome. They richly deserve it .

Maybe the publisher should wait until H finishes his UN legendary speech. I'm quite certain that will be such a classic that will be talked about for years to come.

You know it is perfectly possible to totally ignore Meghan and Harry and live a happy life, don't you?

R20 Darling, you really need to get out more, or start on anti-psychotics, anyhing to help you reorder your priorities in line with earthly realities.

Vladimir Putin is a sick mofo.

I'm just a garden variety eldergay gossip monger on this ridiculous site.

Get a life, dear.

R16

[quote]You know it is perfectly possible to totally ignore Meghan and Harry and live a happy life, don't you?

NO IT'S NOT. THEY MUST BE PUNISHED.

You know it is perfectly possible to totally ignore Meghan and Harry's threads and live a happy life, don't you?

You know, R30, it's perfectly possible to just scroll on past these threads that seem to upset you so much? This is a GOSSIP board. Look the word up. And these cretins are celebrities, like it or not, they're not exempt from, dare I say it again, gosspi!?

Go find a "your favorite movie from the 1970s" thread and enjoy!

R27 Your post reminds me of an old joke a friend told me who grew up in an immigrant Jewish neighbourhood in Brooklyn 70 years ago:

Two old grannies meet on the street and one is pushing her 6 year old grandson in a stroller.

Gran 1: Six years old and he can't walk?! What's the matter with him?

Gran 2: Walk? Of course he can walk! But, thank God, he doesn't have to!

Can we live happily ignoring Meghan and Harry?

Of course.

But, thank God, we don't have to.

People are claiming to be ordering this right and left. So this is getting confusing.

Hell, the ladies on LSA have probably already ordered the entire first printing.

If this isn't legit, there are going to be lots of screams of scam for money.

I can't take the tension.

You know that you can just post on r/SaintMeghanMarkle and not crosspost everything over here, don't you, r30?

Go away meghan ^^^^^

I have to laugh at people who think Harry and Meghan are these amazing and inspirational humanitarians. I'm not one of those "Meghan is the devil and Harry is insane" types, I find them more funny than anything else. But really, all one has to do is some basic research to see that Meghan is a fame hungry, super ambitious person who is ruthless in using people to her own advantage and dumping them the minute they've served their purpose. And Harry, well he's a mess. I mean the idea that he now sees himself as some kind of mental health expert is comedy gold really.

Lets be real here, Meghan has no real friends, she has alienated both her biological family and her in laws. She dropped her first husband via the mail, she dumped her long-time partner in Toronto for Harry. She dumped all her Toronto friends shortly after she moved to the UK. She dumped all her college friends once she got on suits etc. Harry at least had life long friends prior to meeting Meghan but now he's not on speaking terms with any of them either. I mean there is only so long you can deny that you're the problem not everyone else.

I would have some respect for them if they just told the truth for once and said "yeah, royal life was boring a hell. So we moved to America to make a shit load of money" and stop with this whole "one act of compassion at a time."

R28 hysterical frau interloper.

R37 Meghaloon troll with a dozen sock puppet accounts.

I blocked you, and here you are again. How should that be?

Let's try it again, shall we?

You lot know Bower did a hatchet job on Charles, too, right?

Total hatchet job.

Faded into the mists of time without making a dent in Charles' life. It isn't that it wasn't true: it's that these tabloid style books don't age well.

This, I would guess, going to be the fate of this one, as well (and Harry's, and whoever is next on the line trying to make bank on the Windsors).

It would be wonderful if the book would really fuck Meghan up and ruin her chances at winning the Jean Hersholt Humanitarian Award at the Oscars, but . . .

I dunno, with the exception of a few (and credit where due), Brown's earlier book on Diana, The Diana Chronicles, is an exception.

Morton's book was called, Meghan and the Unmasking of the Monarchy. Who remembers it today? No one.

And, for what it's worth, there is already a treatise out on the Bower book on Amazon:

"Meghan Markle According to Tom Bower: What You Should Know About The New Memoir by Harrison Greg"

Popularity rank on Amazon: #99,403.

I ordered the book on Amazon UK. Pre order shipping to the U.S. on July 21st.

R39 A comment on "Meghan Markle According to Tom Bower: What You Should Know About The New Memoir by Harrison Greg" at Goodreads:

Amazon / Kindle - you should be ashamed for selling this badly written and uninformative document.

It is a con. The title is entirely misleading.

It has nothing to say about the forthcoming book, which is not easily available in the media.

Grammar is appalling, and the content is a rehash of old, mostly sycophantic articles.

It appears to me to be a poorly crafted attempt to cash in on Tom Bower's work.

Don't let Greg Harrison take your money. I'm embarrassed that I fell for this nonsens

That comment is in reference to the FAKE Kindle version mentioned by r41.

We'll see, R39, regarding fading into the mists of time. If this book *is* just a bitchier rehash of all the other books that were already rehashes of the Harry and Meghan x BRF drama, then that seems likely. If he's really got the goods, though, I think it could be a much bigger deal than the Charles book for the simple reason that people have much stronger feelings about the Sussexes than they do about Charles. People - and the tabloids - are thirsty for the Sussexes to have their PR-enabled bubble popped. If he has, for example, gotten one of the bullying victims (or Jessica Mulroney) to talk, and to talk forthrightly and at length, that will be a huge deal in the media. I bet the editor of the Daily Mail feels like he's edging right now.

Here's hoping Bower really has the goods. I am about 50/50 on whether or not he does.

Also why is someone psycho attacking R16 and R20? I feel like it might be the same person who came after me the way normal people come after child molestors when I dared to express that I don't find Meghan physically ugly. There are a couple of people here in, who are technically on the same side I am, that really need to calm the fuck down.

Exactly, R32. Yes, it's totally possible to live a happy life without the Sussex drama. But why would anyone want to? It's some of the funniest celeb fuckery we've had for years. Right up there with peak Angelina and Brad.

She's honestly the most desperate, awkward, embarrassing wannabe the celeb world has ever seen. How they must laugh at her!

I of course wasn't around for the Wallis drama, but this one is the wildest, most outrageously horrible person - bullying little Charlotte, shoving her I think I read, bullying the staff, ludicrous level of turnover, family relations worthy of Lucrezia Borgia - well, ok, maybe not that bad, but if she had unlimited power, who knows? She almost makes Trump seem like a decent old chap. Jesus. Public villains like this only come around every decade or two.

^^^^^yes yes and YES. she is the fool of the century.

If it's on Book Depository then it's genuine. The USA release date must be later than the UK one.

Will the Blackamoor brooch get a mention?

That's normal for these UK releases r48. Now we know to go order off the UK Amazon. That's what I did yesterday.

I'm in New Zealand so we have the same release date as the UK

Confirmed it's coming out next week in UK and later this year in other markets.

^See, they keep referring to it as a "biography of Meghan". I wasn't hallucinating and I wasn't crazy. That's why I was expecting one.

But that's not what it looks like now that it's here. Now it's a rehash of the Windsor Wars.

Maybe he should launch a suit against the Home Office for 24/7 armed protection as he goes on PR interviews foe the book, against Meghan's lunatic fans. Because based on her husband's immediacy in the line of succession and her "fans'" belief that Meghan not Kate should be Queen Consort after Camilla, he is now a prime terrorist target.

I think we won't know for sure until next week, R53. I agree that this has been talked about (including by Tom Bower himself quite recently) as a bio/book focused almost solely on Meghan. Who knows what the inclusion of the senior royals on the cover means? It *could* mean (though I really hope it doesn't) that this IS a rehash of the Windsor Wars. Or it could mean someone in the marketing and promo department at the publishers thought it would sell better without a solo image of Meghan.

The last sentence r54. I really think that's the deal.

How can you do a biography of Meghan without including quite a lot on Harry, the Queen, the Prince of Wales/Camilla and the Cambridges?

And all those people are ten times more famous than Meghan, so it simply makes sense to include them in the title and the cover.

The Times has started the serialization of the book and wow already some juicy shit:

The Queen was apparently told friends "thank god" Meghan wasn't coming to Philip's funeral.

When Meghan edited Vanity Fair, both the paper's editors and palace freaked out at the number of lies it contained and it had to be heavily rewritten. One of VF editors said never again when the prospect of Meghan doing more articles for them was raised.

Meghan frequently SCREAMED and allegedly even threw objects at KP staff!

Staff joked she wanted to fuck Prince William.......

Extract One

R58 OMG I'm DYING laughing through this ... thank you this has made my day!

R58 This makes it appears she was all but willing to fuck the reporter doing her first vanity fair interview in exachange for painting her as a humanitarian with made up stories. I'm also guessing Meghan is deleting Serena Williams from her friends list now....

Another extract is out already...I'm sold on buying this book now!

[quote]Meghan called Kashner: “I thought this could have been an actual friendship. I don’t now think that can happen.”

What a huge loss it must have been for him. Delusional bitch.

[quote]Legal wrangles in London could be easily forgotten in California. Only when the whole royal family descended on the G7 summit hosted by the prime minister in Cornwall on June 12, and Kate was filmed laughing with Jill Biden, could Meghan see the unequal struggle for attention. For the British, the sight of William, Charles and the Queen walking through a garden, and alongside the world’s leaders, represented the monarchy’s enduring strength, and William and Kate represented its future. The Windsors felt reassured by the international accolades. Their future public appearances were carefully scheduled and inserted on to a grid, building up to a climax later that year in New York. Their own royal event was planned to consolidate their status in America.

So basically she was so jealous of Kate they cooked up the NYC tour so they could pretend they mattered on the world stage..lol

Trying to imagine a less interesting subject.

I better buy a copy of this book before Kween Meghan sues to block its release or has Sunshine Sachs use a shell company to buy all of the remaining copies and have them burned.

So, the Vanity fair interviewer told Bower that a flirtatious Meghan had referred him to Serena as a friend, but that when he contacted Serena, she denied being anything more than an aquaintance and gave him an enigmatic quote: “You’ve got to be who you are, Meghan. You can’t hide.” Kashner’s unease grew."

That was in the summer of 2016. By the following winter Serena was throwing a half-a-million dollar baby shower for Meghan in NYC?

It's worth noting some essential context that isn't included in this excerpt: that Serena is, like Meghan, represented by Sunshine Sachs.

She really doesn't have any real friends, does she? That denial from Serena is epic.

This book is just backing up what most people saw in her, and made the red flags raise.

R64 - And, yet . . . here you are.

re Serena's denial of friendship, she was front and centre at the wedding the following May, while, for comparison, Harry's lifelong friend Tom Inskip was barred from the Wedding party.

Well, so far, the tidbits are "juicy" enough, but this is hardly, so far, a biography of Meghan.

The most interesting bits are how Meghan has been lying for years about that UN/P&G "victory", and the Vanity Fair cover article, and that the VF said it would neve work with her again. And, how VF changed the date given for when she started dating Harry, moving it up three months to cover up that she was still with the hot Toronto chef when a better opportunity came along.

I'm somewhat suspicious of Bower knowing that the Queen said, "Thank God Meghan isn't coming," to the funeral, because that would indicate that one or more of the Queen's most trusted aides talked to Bower, which I somehow find difficult to believe.

Also, the bits about Charles being so angry with Harry that he's really done with him, if true, are interesting, because all the rumours were that Charles was a soft touch who was still funding Harry.

But for the most part, the extracts ring true so far as what we've seen and surmised about Meghan.

The dark card in all this, to me, is still Harry, not Meghan. She's a known quantity and very little that Bower can say about her would surprise most of us here.

But Harry's motivation, his pathological will to harm his family, his incessant acting out and (despite his boasts to the contrary), his inability to move on from his childhood . . . to me, those are far more interesting and probably won't get much of a look-see by Bower.

For me, to a certain extent, Meghan is always blocking the view re Harry. He's by far the more interesting parti here. She's the camouflage, and in that sense, I'm tired of her.

Let's face it: she's the easy target. Harry is the harder one to nail accurately. But he's the real engine here.

Clever boy, to attach a woman to act as the lightning rod.

Remember in Absolutely Fabulous where Patsy claims to be close friends with Britt Ekland, Zandra Rhodes and Erin O'Connor? Then later on they either claim to barely know her or not at all? Meghan's highly disputed claim of being Serena's BFF brought back that memory.

Celebrities have (or should have) a lot of experience weeding out psychos and con artists like her. The fact that the British Royal Family initially fell for her bullshit long enough for her to get Harry down the aisle is ironic and quite sad.

R70, they're both assholes, simple as that.

I love that the VF interviewer told Bower that he was "surprised" to walk into Meghan's house in Toronto because "The walls were entirely covered with pictures of herself"

ROTFL!!!

Harry is pretty easy to figure out R70. He's furious that he was not born first, and thus of lesser importance, that he is willing to weaponize his dead mother, his children, and use Meghan all to hurl bombs to hurt his family. Meghan got away with all she did, because Harry co-signed all of it. You can't tell me she wouldn't have towed the line if Harry felt happy, and secure slowly falling down the line of succession. He just happened to find a crazy woman, who was more that happy to go to battle with him. Her reasons, and his are both fame, and jealousy about not being #1. Lucky for us, they are so fucking messy about it.

The mud these two will sling to deflect from the book and smear everyone will be epic. I predict they will resurrect William cheating on Kate rumors, they will probably accuse Charles of cheating on Camilla and also allude to Phillip's philandering. They might throw in some DV just to burn the house down. Of course they won't say a thing about Andrew which I still find odd and makes me rather believe the yachting rumors.

How can Sunshine Sachs possibly be regarded as a premiere agency when they are in bed with this slimy duo?

I’ll bet the next PR blitz will be aimed at Kate being just as bad as Meghan in getting William to marry her, and how she stalked him.

SUNSHINE SUCKS.....YOU HAVE BEEN MARKLED ! Stick a fork in them they are done !

I hope they’ve put in the book about “The Daddy Dearest” letter. I have to hand that one to Meghan, she set one hell of a mouse trap with that, and everyone took the bait. I’m more than happy to tip my hat to that scheme. Well played on her part.

Meghan to Kashner: "Talk to Serena! She's my good friend!"

Serena to Kashner: "What? I barely know that bitch. You tell Meghan I said YOU CAN'T HIDE, GIRL."

Sounds like Kashner spoke to Serena before anyone at Sunshine had a chance to call, and tell her to play along. Some intern dropped the ball, likely not knowing who the fuck Meghan was.

MM was presented with an opportunity of a million lifetimes on a diamond encrusted platinum tray, only to shit all over it on the world stage. That is quite the stellar accomplishment.

I cannot wrap my head around how very, very, very badly she played this.

I'm so glad she did, though, R81, because it is enormously entertaining.

R74 - I disagree. Harry is easy to describe, but not so easy to figure out. I don't buy that it was being born second. Something was wrong with that kid from early childhood. I think it goes back to Diana and the relationship between Harry and Diana has never been given its due because people are too busy buying into the easy stuff about her death, being the spare, yadda yadda yadda.

I think Diana is the key to Harry, not William and not Charles - and certainly not Meghan.

Meghan is an acting out mechanism, nothing more.

But Diana is the real woman in Harry's life: she's got him by the short hairs and he refuses to exorcise her. It's, like, totally Sophoclean.

^Think of Diana as Gertrude, and how much more powerful a motivator she is to that whingeing pain in the arse, Hamlet, than Ophelia ever was or could be.

Chelsy and Cressie are lucky they didn't end up like Ophelia.

Meghan Markle has a huge anus.

[quote]I’m more than happy to tip my hat to that scheme. Well played on her part.

That she came out of that harebrained scheme unscathed was luck more than anything else. If that judge hadn't granted her the Summary Judgement (and he did so in the face of a defendant who made it clear they wanted to defend themselves), she would have been fuuuuuucked by a trial. None of those friends who """spontaneously""" went to People magazine to sing Meghan's praises wanted to be put on the stand, and they were leaking as much all over the place. Even WITH the summary judgement it still came out she lied to the court about her cooperation with Omid Scoobie.

r83 I think he is stuck in immature love of his mother rather than real or realistic love. I think he has her on a pedestal as a saint and blameless victim at some level were as I think William loves his mother warts and all with her flaws known and understood. Ultimately loving someone warts and all without a pedestal of sainthood is much healthier and more truthful/ realistic.

I think that is part of what is going on.

[quote] MM was presented with an opportunity of a million lifetimes on a diamond encrusted platinum tray, only to shit all over it on the world stage.

BLOCK THAT METAPHOR!

I agree with you, R83. It's much deeper than "jealous of big bro who will be king" (although I imagine he is probably a little jealous) and I think it centers on Mummy as well. Harry is probably a born fuck-up, but then he lost his mum at a very bad age (old enough to understand what was happening, not old enough to handle or process it) and since then his entire life appears to have revolved around finding a woman who would help him re-enact his childhood trauma. His finding, marrying and having kids with her will be the mistake and the singular act of his life.

He's ultimately trying to fix something (the loss of his mother) that cannot be fixed (Diana cannot be saved retroactively). On top of that Diana and Charles were both awful, neglectful, selfish, self-obsessed fucking losers as parents and the entire family culture was not equipped to deal with problems like Harry's.

This makes me sound sympathetic - I'm not. He's a grown man and his decision to have children with Meghan Markle was his own. Everything he's done since he was 18 is on him.

There is already an active thread on this.

I think you're too late, r90. You're not going to squelch a thread with that complaint ninety posts into it.

R91 you could start a thread on Meghan about anything and it would have 90 posts on an hour because most of the people who post in them are psychotic.

Regardless, I was just informing everyone as a suggestion because Muriel will start nuking these threads if there are too many.

Im shocked that the faux humanitarian that is Meghan openly mocked the Vanity Fair guys stutter.That is despicable but an indication of what she really is without the fairydust her PR people use to bedazzle people.

R92 It isn't as if some of us haven't tried, but those of us directing others to another thread on the same topic get ignored.

And I believe THIS thread is the one that got opened first.

And fuck that psychotic bullshit. Ffs, the bloody TIMES is running the excerpts! You act as if any interest in one of the biggest celebrity stories in recent years is somehow aberrant, not to mention the fact that such stories are WHY THIS BLOODY SITE EXISTS.

Let us know when the TIMES starts running columns on Sam Heughan or Froylan or Madden or Liza or Vivian Vance.

[quote]Im shocked that the faux humanitarian that is Meghan openly mocked the Vanity Fair guys stutter.

I'm not. She's like Trump, not above making fun of or trying to humiliate people she considers beneath her. Remember when she was being interviewed on the red carpet in Toronto by that inept host? She started rolling her eyes at him and became dismissive. On a red carpet. On live TV. He wasn't good at his job but she was the one who really looked bad,

r95 I vaguely remember that but the big takeaway from that which I recall, unless i am getting mixed up with a different event, is her annoyance that the interviewer was obviously looking around the crowd for a bigger celebrity to interview.

I have it on good authority that Camilla just got “Bower” tattooed on her ass.

To the person calling in the Luftwaffe for a blitz, you have to link the other thread. Der Fuhrer outlined this numerous times.

^^ horse shit. No Official in the thread title,

^^ and I type this with affection.

I have to hand it to you, r98, that was the funniest Mein Fuhrer I've ever seen.

[quote] She's like Trump, not above making fun of or trying to humiliate people she considers beneath her. She's like Trump, not above making fun of or trying to humiliate people she considers beneath her.

Yes, exactly like Trump. More than once he has been filmed mimicking the physical disabilities or racial characteristics of people who have displeased him. It's "funny" don't ya know?

She didn't make fun of his stutter; she said she liked it. This was when she was buttering him up and trying to charm him.

People know when others are paying false compliments r103. Malignant narcs are famous for this. He knew she wasn't sincere and she likely had a tone that made it clear.

Normally people are shitfaced loaded to speak in such an obvious manner, but this crazy bitch does it sober.

[quote]And fuck that psychotic bullshit.

It's not psychotic to ask you guys to not have 10 or more active threads at once, where all you do is repeat yourself, anyway. It's just incomprehensible to me that you think the people asking you to stop deliberately spamming the site are literally psychotic.

[quote] Ffs, the bloody TIMES is running the excerpts! You act as if any interest in one of the biggest celebrity stories in recent years is somehow aberrant, not to mention the fact that such stories are WHY THIS BLOODY SITE EXISTS.

This is a gay gossip site. It started out as one of the "is he gay?" gossip sites. The name is even a pun on "DL" being shorthand for "downlow" back then. That's why the site exists. It doesn't exist for a bunch of straight women to spam the website about one single topic for years on end. There have been countless topics like soaps, LOTR, Kristen Stewart, and others which had all their threads deleted because the spamming got to be too much. If that doesn't happen to you, it's only because you showed up at the end of DL's life, when no one was monitoring the site anymore.

R103. That’s like saying you like someone’s double chin. It’s meant to denigrate the interviewer.

It’s the most incredible (and telling) thing, that MM talked about his stutter - while trying to suck up to him! There are people like that, saying things like “I admire you for not having your nose done” and believing they are paying a compliment. Absolute sociopaths.

R108 correct! She easily could have complimented him on his writing of past VF articles. (In fairness, many she did but it’s more fun for Bower to point out the stuttering comment.)

Love the jab from the VF writer that every book ever written about England was positioned strategically around her apartment, but he doubted she’d ever cracked one of them. Clearly an attempt to remind him to ask her about Harry even though he was told not to by her publicists.

The books were props. We all know Meghan knew nothing about England, Harry or the RF.

I thought Meghan claimed she knew little of British culture and the tabloids were a shock, or something to that effect? I think she also claimed that she didn't know about royal protocols, yet her home was full of British reference books? She's a liar and a fraud.

She had a carefully curated and extremely tasteful and photogenic arrangement of books on display in her kitchen, R111, who said anything about reading them? HRH The DoS is a philanthropist, effector of change, and a bestselling writer, not a reader.

That guy on YT with the deep voice that does commentary on Meg's narcissism, HG Tudor, calls her a "banana-tarian". I think that sums up her philanthropy and humanitarianism.

R113, HG Tudor has begun reviewing the Bower book, commenting on Harry's wife narcissism in the except about the Vanity Fair interview.

Link to part 1.

A little bit more

OK, I give in. I'm buying the bloody book - it's too juicy not to.

Ha ha same, R116. This will be the loss of my carefully preserved royal book virginity but fuck it.

Re: the books in Meg's house: shades of Thomas looking at websites/reading books about England in that arranged photoshoot that Meghan pretended was the reason she had to cut him off.

I think the piles of coffee table books about Britain was Megs & Sunshine Sachs setting the scene of the interview to specifically encourage the interviewer to ask about Harry while preserving technical plausible deniability that they were following Harry' orders not to mention him.

I am officially putting Meghan on my 2023 death-watch list.

Why wait so long, r120?

Narcissism is a powerful ego-defense mechanism and they're less likely than you'd think to commit suicide. They just keep telling themselves that they're never to blame for anything - it's someone else's fault -- or someone else made them do whatever their latest devilment is.

R120, put Harry on it instead. He's more likely to off himself already at this point in the entire story than narcy Megsy ever was and ever will be.

I believe that concern for Harry offing himself is the reason the BRF hasn't come down harder on him.

^^ and ^ Whilst I doubt very much H is at immediate risk, I would guess that his mental state is more vulnerable self-destruction than Meghan's. Meghan is a classic figher/survivor. Her claims of being suicidal given her penchant for lies, corruption, vindictiveness, and, above all, self-regard, were in my view hilarious.

Whilst Harry certainly shares those traits with her, his stem from deep emotional damage, ties to feelings of worthlessness, frustration, despair, and intense conflict.

Meghan isn't conflicted at all: she's always been Centre First or Bust, and she's much tougher and harder.

But Harry's conflict re his family and his country are rather obvious. There isn't any resolution possible here, as he continues to conduct his life solely on acting out those conflicts, instead of moving beyond them (those lawsuits against the UK government re his security status scream those conflicts loud enough to be heard in Outer Space).

I could envisage a point at which, if things go awry enough, Harry's mental state deteriorates dangerously beyond.

His blood family, i.e., the Queen, his father, and his brother, I suspect know that as nothing has seemed to move Harry from his perch of paranoid rage, there isn't much they can do except keep him and Meghan as far from their own families and lives.

It is tragic, and it probably isn't easy at last to accept that there really isn't anything you can do to help or make things better except for continuing to feed the person's dangerously inflated view of what he is owed, coddle him, keep the fingers crossed . . .

Because that's what they did throughout Harry's youth. When he left with Lion Tamer Meghan holding the reins, Harry was doomed.

Whether that leads to early death no one can predict, but if it does, it will most assuredly be Harry, not Meghan, finally breaking the internet with Haxit.

harry will evolve to a polo-country-club drunk sitting at the bar surrounded by sycophants trying to get a bit of his stale royal pixie-dust sprinkled on to them. He'll be an overweight bar-fly saying crazy shit surrounded by yes-men. He'll be there hero of the country club, lol!

Best case scenario R126. Can he even hold it together enough to achieve that? (and I think he'd be happier doing a similar thing in England where at least he has old friends). California is for the birds (and users).

R109 Ok I must play devil's advocate, only because I don't always wholly trust journalists. Suppose Kashner himself had made some little allusion such as "oops haha sorry, I have this little stutter as you may have noticed" and Meghan politely replied, "Oh no, it's charming, I actually like it!" Not saying that was how it went, obviously I have no idea, but it could have, and then gotten twisted into "I like your stutter." We all know that shit happens.

R119 Yeah, the books were just hints. Meghan and her team would have known how Vanity Fair writers write, which is to report on little details and colorful observed bits, heavy description. Even if the subject of Harry had never come up, the writer could have just made a bigger deal of the books.

R128, the interview, though, almost certainly was recorded.

R130 Exactly. If it had gone down a y other way, Kashner wouldn't have been angry enough to share it with Bower. And it is claimed that Graydon Carter said VF would never work with her again.

Like Reirman's, Netflix, Spotify, probably VOGUE, and, of course, the Windsors.

All that's left is the Democrats, and she's already pissed them off with the cold calling private numbers bullshit.

^*Reitman's

Oh god, the Democrats need Meghan Markle like they need Susan Sarandon.

“She is definitely the meanest person I’ve ever met. Just saying," Jean Malek, the third director, posted on Facebook.

I think this really is turning out to be a biography of the real Meghan Markle!

I knew Bower wouldn't disappoint.

These are the shoes she stole. Looks like what Poo Shoes wore at the Bellagio.

She will concoct some health tragedy and blame the book. She will get victim mileage out of this.

She wore stolen shoes to her engagement photo call. She's even worse than we imagined.

Every story reminds us that not one person knew who the fuck MM was before Harry. This alone will enrage her.

The shoes don’t even fit her properly LOL!!

Seriously, they're way too big!

She looks maniacal at the UN today. Harry looks unwell. The room was almost empty for his speech.

There were so few people watching Harry give that speech! and he looked so angry in some screen shots. I've just started watching the Body Language guy live stream - but at about minute 11 at link you can see the mostly empty audience! (18 people in center section and 9 on their phones lol!)

Harry preaching about mental health when he and his wife are both nutcases, you can't make this shit up!

And what's even worse is this wealthy bimbo prince who flies in private jets addressing the UN about global poverty and the environmental crisis.

Wow.

R95 do you have a link to that video??

She was vaguely known in Toronto pre Harry only because she was with Corey the chef. He was the famous one (in Toronto terms, which means she was unknown outside the city). Through Coreys work and connections she had access to the Mulroneys and other “elites” and political heavyweights of Toronto/Canada. Then ultimately ran into Harry at some event. The whole blind date story she cooked up is hilariously ridiculous.

Two incidents that to me showed her true colours were 1) on her wedding day as she was exiting the car outside the church an older gentleman, some sort of valet or aide put out his hand to help her and she literally slapped it away hard. Like a child. 2) at one of the balcony events (trooping the colour perhaps) it was an extremely hot day and one of the soldiers on horseback fainted/fell off his horse. Catherine and everyone else looked horrified and worried. Meghan started laughing as if it was the funniest thing ever.

Another Meghan fashion failure.

Why does Meghan dress poorly? I bet she owns hundreds of mirrors, so why can't she see when her outfit is wrong? They're not usually complete disasters, but there's nearly always something off about every look.

What other pre-2000 celebrity will Meghan meet with next???!!! I can hardly wait to find out!!!

Because. Meghan thinks as long as she’s wearing some Ridiculously expensive piece from a top designer that she looks fab and is the envy of all. The reality of the mirror has nothing to do with it.

Meghan and her mirror!

She can't dress properly because she has no waist, an abundance of backfat, a flat chest and chicken legs. I doubt she even fits into off the rack or ready to wear designer labels properly. There's a photo on the internet somewhere of her in jeans and a top and there's barely any difference between the width of her chest, waist and hips. It's actually quite shocking that she thinks she's so sexy.

Obviously she never looks at other women's bodies and compares herself to them, noticing where she's different. In that red gala gown, her love handles oozed at the waist. What she wore to the NAACP awards worked much better than most things she wears. She should go back to that designer

She wore that jumpsuit to show she had no backfat. Big mistake.

If you blow up the jumpsuit picture, you can see little strings hanging down from the white part. Obviously that white rag was made by a Chinese slave labor child at 5:00 pm on Saturday afternoon when nobody gave a shit about quality. Megs probably picked it up at a seconds store or maybe it’s a napkin from the restaurant they were at.

Is it not a designer jumpsuit? Usually she leaks the name of the designer and the price tag.

I posted on here before that Meghan actually met Harry in May 2016 at the Invictus games that Corey catered. I remember it because Coreys mom was ambushed on her driveway and asked about Meghan. Her reply was something like, "what? They were just here for Mothers Day". She didnt know yet that Corey was dumped for Harry. Nice to see the truth is finally coming out.

I didnt know about her horrible diva and kleptomaniac behaviour at the Reitmans shoots though. Hilarious. Keep the excerpts coming!

Sounds interesting

.....

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Harry would have to give back the advance and there is no way his minder would allow that. Plus, it most certainly has already been spent.

Gatecrashing mourning events, KLASSY!

R162, that sounds like BS. No way they expected Harry would come without her.

That does sound like BS. It's not a show of unity if one of the spouses isn't there.

This was meant to squelch all the rumors about why Harry couldn't make it to Balmoral prior to the announcement of the Queen's death. Was he fighting with Meghan? Was he forbidden a seat on that plane full of princes? Who knows, but we do know he stayed at Balmoral for only about 12 hours. This little walkabout doesn't fool anyone, but it's a reasonable figleaf. Everybody has to be seen to get along until the Queen is buried on the 19th, and then they can go back to ignoring each other until the coronation.

It must be frustrating that so many things keep happening and you just have to pick a point to STOP.

I guess he can keep issuing new editions, like textbook writers do, every six months, while the situation is 'hot' - and then within a year or two, none of us will give a damn about these two grifters but Bower's bank balance will be nice and plumped up for his retirement.

[quote]his little walkabout doesn't fool anyone, but it's a reasonable figleaf. Everybody has to be seen to get along until the Queen is buried on the 19th, and then they can go back to ignoring each other until the coronation.

It's Kate's behaviour toward Meghan that is telling the real story behind the walkabout charade. Both William and Harry have to put on the professional image, the whole world is watching for their every move in the few moments they are together. William is obviously the alpha and is leading anodyne conversation with harry as they approach the throngs of well-wishers. But notice Kate doesn't do more than a trite acknowledgement to Meghan, then not a word between them. While William and Harry have to play to the cameras, Kate, in her silence are telling the world that the draw-bridge is up as far as reconciliation. The mutual walk of the Cambridge's and the Sussex's probably came about with Meghan throwing a fit about being marginalized, and when Harry and Meghan suggested that they would do a solo walk (with US Network tv crew in tow, of course), well William probably lowered the boom and said that he and Kate would accompany, with their full security. It will be interesting to see the seating position for the funeral. Meghan will throw a fit again if she's seated anywhere but with senior Royals. Hope they tell her (and Harry for that matter) to get on a plane home if they don't like it.

Watch how Kate 'doesn't' interact with Meghan through the week to get the real sentiment of the Sussex's standing in Royal circles.