"When we talk to God, we call it 'prayer': when he talks to us, we call it 'schizophrenia'" RD Laing
This approach to aberrant (for the sake of argument) mental issues isn't that new.
Some of the shift has to do with a loosening in other areas of social norms; Laing's quote is from the 1960s.
". . . Taking the expressed feelings of the individual patient or client as valid descriptions of personal experience rather than simply as symptoms of mental illness, Laing regarded schizophrenia as a theory not a fact. Though associated in the public mind with the anti-psychiatry movement, he rejected the label. Politically, he was regarded as a thinker of the New Left. . . ."
And there you have it.
I thought it an interesting observation until I met the sister of a friend who had exhibited attachment issues and other signs of schizophrenia when still an infant. I had known that the friend had an institutionalised sister, but did not meet her till she was about 22, released for a few days to spend a bank holiday weekend with the family.
Five minutes in her presence, and I knew Laing was full of shit. Some aberrant landscapes really are, the labels may need refining as research uncovers more, and I wouldn't wish poor Erica's fate on my worst enemy. Joy, attachment, curiosity, learning, et al, were all closed to this young woman.
The urge to escape the knowledge that one is "damaged" or out of sync with the rest of society is quite understandable.
I'm not sure what the answer is, except to find some sensible middle ground between the denial of reality and demonisation, and to recognise that some "aberrations" are far more extreme than other.
And, as an eldergay, I have always to remind myself of what history's aberrant judgement has meant for us.