Smeg & Harry Humiliated

She’s fine. She sends her regards.

She doesn’t look humiliated to me, Piers.

i can't see anything you see, OP, but she always has a hand on him, which is interesting.

"She suddenly looks older and shorter and shorter." And wider and wider.

Put down the rose coloured glasses and you shal see.

Actually, she looks happy to me, and I love her coat and hat. Her constant clutching of Harry's hand does probably indicate she's scared, but I don't think she's miserable.

Harry also looks quite happy, and except for the weird patchy balding he looks quite handsome.

I think they're glad now not to have to sit next to William and Kate, who don't like them (with good reason). Sitting with Beatrice and Eugenie, the cousins he likes best, probably makes him really happy.

As for the others:

*this is one of the first times I've ever seen Charles look really like an old man. He's hunched over as he walks in and looks his age.

*I agree Anne looks the best--great hat and outfit. I love Kate's dress but not so much her hat.

*Peter Phillips looks like he's getting stouter, as does Sophie Wessex. They are both showing their age.

*Zara Tindall's fascinator is ten years out of date

*Mike Tindall has clearly had another major nose job. The last one straightened his nose out from the rugby injuries, but this one looks like it's made his nose much smaller

*Louise Windsor dresses like a little girl which looks silly given that she's 18 now

We’re they not sat with the Yorks because they are adjacent to one another in the line of succession?

She doesn't look happy to me. She looks as if she is cursing under her breath when she is walking with Harry.

Look, if we all pat you on the head and say yes, yes, they're miserable, they will be slitting their wrists first thing in the morning, will you shut up about them?

At least they could have put them on the aisle.

"Humiliated" = Total knockout

Fool 😂

R9- I really wouldn't gaf.

[quote] At least they could have put them on the aisle.

Why? They are not important.

Would you be willing to take a course in learning how to recognize rhetorical questions, r12?

Oh okay.

They ARE important. They are the focus of the article and this thread. Harry is the son of the next King and the brother of the one after that, “working” or not.

I do not care about the petty fucking problems of the rich and privileged anymore than they care about us. People are going homeless and hungry in this country and the republicans and the wealthy are making that happen. I also don't gaf about AH and JD. Two rich, narcissistic, spoiled twats who will never have to worry about their children being homeless. I if they all slit their damn throats the world would be a much nicer place.

What country is "this country", R17? We're not the mind-readers you think we are.

I don't see what you see, granny OP.

You old hags are fucking batshit crazy with hate.

R18- The one they live in now, but people are suffering everywhere. These two selfish privileged people who were given every fucking privilege available but bitched at having to smile a few hours a week disgust me. Scamming the very charities they brag about helping, business deals with oligarchs, whinnying like the two spoiled, ungrateful little shits that they are instead of using their privilege to help those in need? As I said, I don't gaf if they die.

R20- Whining.

Harry’s bald spot is getting bigger

Why do people keep bringing up his bald spot? Baldness runs in the family. No big surprise there.

He should have taken propecia

R23- I think because of his red hair it just really stands out. He would look much better if he just shaved the rest of his hair off, imo.

[quote]They ARE important. They are the focus of the article and this thread.

What would that possibly have to with where they are placed in St. Paul's cathedral. "Oh, if they're the focus of an article in the Daily Mail and a thread on a gay gossip forum, absolutely put them on the aisle!"

No, they are absolutely NOT important to the BRF. Harry is no longer a working royal (through his own insistence), and he is no longer in the direct line of succession, given William's three children who are all before him in the line of succession and who will have children one day who will also be before him.

R26- Not only are they not important, they are barely tolerated.

Fuck you.

This is what Meghan never seems to figure out. Once William had his own children, Harry ceased to be important to anyone except the tabloid press (who only cares about him because he's Diana's son). George will inherit the throne, and Charlotte and Louis are his back-ups. From the perspective of the BRF, Harry is irrelevant.

That photo of Sophie Wessex in the car is revealing. What a tough bitch (though she throws a nice smile when she is knowingly on camera). No wonder the Queen likes her. Saved her son from homosexuality, theatre, and a failed private personal and professional life. Working royals again. I fear it is too late for Harry and Meghan to take that prodigal son path.

Harry will be as important as all of Charles' siblings combined as the future exclusive sibling of the future Prince of Wales.

Right behind Georgie, Charlotte and Louie

So goes Betty, so goes the Wessexes...

Charlotte looks like she would cut a bitch. H&M had best not piss her off.

Zara and Mike took one for the team by standing on the steps so Harry & his wife could get some pictures taken.

Harry's wife perpetual big teeth smile is ridiculous. No wonder she didn't have much of a career. She doesn't know how to behave in new situations.

Love the seating arrangements in the church. Seated the gruesome twosome behind the Duke and Duchess of Gloucester. Dutiful. And not ones who Harry's wife can expect to be photographed so no need to hang over their shoulders.

Louise looked good. Very slender and I liked her dress.

Great care was taken with logistics to make absolutely sure there were no photos or videos of Harry and his wife with the senior royals.

Some of the posters over on the LSA MMUO thread do not believe that the California kids were even brought to the UK. Witnesses at the airport claim their parents got off the plane with no kiddies in sight.

Glad to see Princess Alexandra arrive at the Church. She appeared to go in a side door with her brother and she seemed unsteady on her feet. Looked lovely in a dark blue ensemble. So nice to see her there. She is a favorite of mine.

LOL…you know someone is reaching when they proclaim Anne as “elegant” and “regal”.

[quote]Some of the posters over on the LSA MMUO thread do not believe that the California kids were even brought to the UK. Witnesses at the airport claim their parents got off the plane with no kiddies in sight.

It must be exhausting to make up conspiracies for every tiny little thing that happens in the world.

[quote]What a tough bitch (though she throws a nice smile when she is knowingly on camera). No wonder the Queen likes her. Saved her son from homosexuality

Imagine posting this on a gay board with the name "eldergay69," and expecting people to take it seriously.

Harry and the missus look dejected and rejected.

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

I do think Meghan and Harry were probably treated poorly prior to Megxit. They probably did what they had to do. They handled it poorly, which makes them unsympathetic.

[Quote]I also don't gaf about AH and JD.

I understand people have still got issues with Armie Hammer, but what did Judi Dench do to you, R17?

R1 Can you tell me what evil act or felony these two committed? I'm not a fan of any royal but the hate for them many years out is just bizarre.

I'm kind of surprised Prince Andrew is running free given all his Ghislaine Maxwell trials.

Kate needs to invest in a good bra.

Re picture at R39

Note another place where someone took one for the team

Here (and in one other place) it was Sarah Chatto and her family who were positioned close to Harry & his wife.

Jesus fucking christ, some of you ass sucking royal fangirls are way too vested. Who the fuck knows who any of these people are beyond old Lizzie and her offspring? The Gloucesters??? Some of you have to be stereotypical Victorian spinsters.

Harry and Megs may not be important, but the facts are that they are THERE and we’re not, so we all sound like idiots, while they all drink tea with other royals with their pinky fingers up in the air.

LMAO.

I admit that I am a little confused by the gloating over them not being in the line of succession or not being near the front of the procession, when they chose, of their own free will, to not be royalty. You act as if they were kicked out. However, I also see you also act as if they are traitors to the crown for choosing to leave. It doesn't make much sense.

Yikes!!!!!!!!!!!

R38- Wow. That IS very telling.

As they exited St Pauls the crowd went wild!

Megs looks gorgeous.

I don’t get it. They aren’t working royals, by their own choice. Why would they be front and center?

R26, it is not true that Harry is no longer in the direct line of succession. He is sixth, and ranks high enough that The Queen had to approve his marriage.

I would like to remind all of the posters who like to harp on the current unpopularity of the Sussexes that public opinion shifts and they will continue to a part of the family for decades to come. If memory serves correctly, The Queen herself was highly unpopular after her seemingly cold reaction to Diana’s death and many royal experts believe if Tony Blair had not stepped in a insisted that The Queen address the public there would have been irreparable damage done to the institution of the monarchy as a whole.

They weathered that storm and it is entirely possible that with time the Sussexes may well rebound.

The most rabid watchers know why they hate the couple; it’s glaringly obvious, R47.

One of the most unstable in this thread accuses them of giving up their excessive privilege because they didn’t want to smile and work a few hours a week.

Now…according to these same lunatics, the Sussexes are lazy for wanting to make their own way and NOT feed at the welfare trough like the rest of the BRF in exchange for a few hours a week.

It doesn’t make sense.

R45 Yet you're here Gran?

R48- Idk what they expected after the British people bestowed so much good faith and good wishes upon them, expensive wedding, only to then be falsely accused of being racists and then fleeing after only two years.

The Independent UK had a poll where Harry and Meghan were voted most popular royals.

R51- Meghan looks dirty and insane.

I know why they hate them, r54. It's just that I don't understand how they don't notice their own constant, contradictory claims about the Sussexes.

Camilla comes to mind, R53. Time heals all.

If Princess Michael of Kent (who has publicly referred to The Queen as less royal than herself) can be invited without issue, H&M will always have a place if the want one within the BRF.

R57- Yes those loud boo's prove how popular they are. 😂.

Stone the Dolt and his Wog Harlot!

I would love to hear you explain how the poll was rigged or faked, r61. Do tell.

R59- I have consistently disliked them from the very beginning of their ridiculous, abusive, spoiled, ungrateful behavior

[quote]Wog

Another normal day on Datalounge, I see.

Well do tell why the gov poll shows them to be only above Andrew in popularly? And another one.

You said the Independent poll was wrong. I asked you to prove it. If you can't, you can't. Just admit it.

Most Americans DGAF about this.

Personally, I enjoy the hair, makeup and wardrobes.

The bitchy gossip is a tad fun, but after a while, it becomes either tedious or crosses the line.

It’s just silly.

Honestly?

None of these people should be living like this. It’s kinda gross. The wealth is obscene. But the Brits eat this shit up and it’s obviously the bread and butter of the British Media and Press.

I like the Queen, because she’s been in all of our lives since we were born, but that’s it. There’s really no other reason.

Diana was the best thing that came out of that whole thing, because at least she was nuts, but likeable and vulnerable, which made people relate. Her death made her an icon for the ages, and that’s it.

The rest of them are all pretty boring in comparison.

Diana was the star of that family, and in many ways, still is.

Here is R42 on a gossip site, unable to understand how people are gossiping.

You prove me wrong. They are unlikable. They were booed. Jfc.

[quote] Louise Windsor dresses like a little girl which looks silly given that she's 18 now

Yesterday, all the comments on DM were complaining that she was dressing like a 70-year old lady. So she can't win.

Don't start crying, r70. I know it's embarrassing that you made a claim that you can't back up, but this is an anonymous forum. Only you know that you made that mistake.

More booing

Meg really is gorge, with her refrigerator silhouette and wired mic sticking out of her coat. Timeless.

Are you kidding R55? While I don't give two shits about royals, you slavering fangirls and rabid Markle haters are hilarious. You constantly make up shit about them that is quite contradictory. You breathlessly claim to know the inner thoughts of complete strangers.

Like I said, batshit.

R75- Then why are you on this thread?

The poll at R57 was a poll of Independent readers only, not representative of the country as a whole.

R74- And the back fat!

R76 If you read my comment then you know why. Reading comprehension problems?

The Markles will never have a working place in the BRF as long as William is there. So in other words, enjoy the back pew smack in the middle.

I posted on the "official Jubilee watching thread" but my husband and I were outside St. Paul's today and I can confirm Harry and Meghan were heartily booed, particularly on their way out. I think the bells saved them from much more embarrassing TV coverage because they bells tuned a lot of it out. But you can tell looking at the images that Harry was VERY uncomfortable when they arrived in the church. Added to that, they were the only royals who didn't turn back to wave at the crowd at the top of the stairs.

I'll be honest I am not really a fan of their, but it was bloody awkward. What really does make it worse for them is the fact that this was London of all places which is probably much more pro-Sussex than anywhere else in the country.

R65 Since you are the only ole Kween left who still uses the antediluvian quote function you out your prisspot self everytime. Go into the light Duchess.

R76, you said the same thing r75 did, in your reply at r17. Why are you yelling at someone for saying what you have also said? Why would you have posted over 20 times in this thread if you don't care, like you claimed at r17?

R79- oh dear! Someone is in a snit because her skanky girl is very much unliked. 😂

OP, dear fageaux, your tiara is plastic.

Right, R84?! That dirty-looking, skanky wog! Tee hee! Hang her, amirite?

R83- Ignoring the unhinged skank Stan.

R47, SDASTFU.

They're lying about needing security because no one dislikes them that much and no one would bother them.

They're also loathed by everyone throughout the country and people show up at the Jubilee specifically to boo them.

Why do you think R83 is a "skank stan"? Nothing in his comment led me to think that.

I think R6 was spot on; I loved that green silk jacket Anne was wearing - that was really one of her best looks & highlighted how what handsome woman she is. Sophie looked better yesterday in that tailored suit. She didn't look quite so matronly. Zara always looks nice, in spite of the peter pan color & puffy sleeves, accentuating her broad shoulders. Peter looks like he's spending his post-COVID freedom at the pub.

As far as the topic at hand, Megs always has that pasted on smile, so it's hard to say, but given the way Harry maneuvered himself behind his brother at the Phillip's funeral, you couldn't help but notice that he was so far back that he'd have to take out about 10 people to get in the same shot as Chuck & Wills

R84 is why everyone thinks the marklestans are batshit. If someone DOESN'T make childish "backfat" or "she's ugly" comments then that person must LOVE her.

Unhinged and psychotic children.

Had they been any further back they would have been on the grounds of Frogmore.

R92- Yes you are but we are forced to tolerate you anyway.

This is Harry and Meghan leaving St. Paul's ... their faces say it all.

It’s amazing how obsessed the Brits are with the wife of the spare. Hilarious, actually.

I think he was game for it R91, but couldn't make a move because the guards had him blocked. He appeared agitated to learn that he had to climb over four people to get to his seat, and Meg was stroking his back to soothe. And then upon exit, they were the last or near last in the procession. The paper said Charles "looked away" as they passed.

R96 Particularly hilarious coming from someone who has made over a dozen posts on this thread.....

You might try that again R94. I'm not the one making shit up about complete strangers.

They have made 2, r98. If we're at the point of the thread where the trolls start making stuff up about the posters, then I guess the thread is officially dead.

Well, HBD to Lili-Bet, or whatever the tyke’s name is.

She got to meet great grandma, and play with a bunch of kooky and fancy hats, undoubtedly.

Hope Archie’s having a ball as well.

R99- Bad day, huh? 😂

R99- Ignore. Buh bye

It is amazing R96 and that they also know who this Michael of Kent and Zara are.

My day is fine, thanks.

R95- She looks as if she is going to cry. No plastered on, over exaggerated smile as usual.

The video of Harry walking down the steps shows that he is the best hung of the lot. Or perhaps he has California (International Male) underwear??

LOL @ OP, you poor dear. You are dreaming up some pretty dramatic interpretations from rather generic photos. What must your sad little life be like, I wonder?

R108- I would imagine much healthier than your delusional one.

Lmao, someone here is shading us for bitching about H&M and yet they're also on this thread and won't stop posting... I don't know, I don't know...

R110- Scabies?

No, R110, they’re probably calling out the hypocritical cunts making up stories about pictures we all can see.

R109 and R110 are the reasons they be crazy. They insist that ONE and only ONE person thinks they are idiots. Yes, people who DON"T watch royals and loathe Meghan are the delusional ones. Right......

R110 is very disturbed.

So…it’s not the racism, R113? The racism leveled against Meghan in this very thread? That you and your lot have ignored because you possibly agree with it?

No, that’s not it, right? Of course not.

Yeah, I used the trolldar and there's two of you. R114 has posted 13 times so far.

Because a biracial female just can't be a mean, hideous piece of absolute shit, right? Fucking idiots

Give it up, Scobie + intern, you can't win. Your duchess is boooooooed.

What are you blathering about R115? I wrote that but didn't mention race nor have I ever mentioned it.

I think Meghan's belt should have been wider. It's hard to pull off skinny belts. Also, the belt was too long and extended the horizontal line across the middle (with the excess length extending out past the waist).

If you don't watch royals, why are you on this thread, snd so passionately? Are you... paid?

R119- Ignore!

And R116? I've been here since 1995 and wasn't aware that there a limit on comments.

Ignore them. They just want to derail the thread. Odious cunts.

R121 are you? I'm not interested in them. It's you fucking crazy cows that amuse me. I don't know who half of these assholes are. I just find it amusing that you dissect every photo, every glance, smirk and fashion these people display.

[quote]I used the trolldar

I also used the trolldar, and found a thread about Ketamine that you started that explains this whole entire mess of a thread.

I would say this wasn't a very happy visit for those two, lol. You could almost feel the freeze from your screen

I used the trolldar? Trolling from a foreign country?

The hooker sashay!

No idea, r128. I was just trying to make fun of them a little. It reminded me of a scene on "Breaking Bad" where Skyler was pretending to be stupid, and called her accounting software "the Quicken."

R129- Always enter vagina first! 😂

Watching the clips back, the boos were far more noticeable on their way out of St. Paul. Lucky for them the bells made it harder to distinguish the difference between the boos and the cheers.

R129- Her vagina is always one step ahead of the rest of her. 😂

R129 she's swishing her arse like she's one of those Deal or no Deal strumpets... Oh wait...

She either contoured the hell out of that nose or she's had it done again. You can tell she's been starving herself from the look of those laugh lines by her mouth. Her neck is also showing her age. That collar is doing her no favors.

The flap across the back was a terrible choice. Nothing to be done at this point about her thick waist.

She was either nervous, scared, or upset. It is not like her to miss a chance to wave at cameras/audiences.

Also, that coat drowned her. She's too short for that style. Add the wide-brimmed hat and the white colour and you get one tense swarthy face swimming in a pool of ghostly wideness. Bad look overall.

R126 it was also lecturing DL on misogyny and being cruel towards women while claiming to not be a woman. I smell frau and hypocrite since she is surely cruel and misogynistic to the object of her vitriol.

R135- Her mother looks good for her age, or did. I haven't seen a photo of her in over a year. It doesn't look as if MM will be that lucky. She already looks much older than her 41 years.

Even the filler cant help/hide the new laugh lines.

She looks positively miserable in this photo, R139. Fixed smile but not her usual - you can see the strain here. Her eyes are not smiling.

The coat is incredibly wrinkly around her rectangular frame. She can make even a classic Dior look cheap.

More of OP's charming threads.

Ketamine therapy I siffer from tgerapy-resistant major depressive disorder. Recently I heard that ketamine therapy is supposed to be near miraculous in the treatment of resistant MDD. Has anyone here tried it? What about electric shocks? Any good? This is my last hope.

The Charisma of Jeffrey Dahmer I just watched the famous interview with Jeffrey Dahmer. Not only is he attractive and charismatic - he is also well-spoken, oddly relatable and even endearing. It's easy to write him off as a psychopath because we need the people who do monstrous things to be monsters. But what if he was what he looks like - a normal man who did unspeakable things? Isn't that even scarier?

She does look a bit bloated. She should go home, rip that shit off for some pjs and eat everything in the fridge.

Wow, R142, what a stalker you are! Creep, just like your favourite hussy.

The Desolation of Smeg

[quote]swarthy face

This kind of comment makes me think the OP doesn't even care about the Sussexes, and is simply using this topic as a vehicle for all the rancid stuff they want to say.

R141- She refuses to dress for her body type. She dresses as if she has the body type of Catherine- long, lean, thin. She had all of the best help available to her. Idk what she sees when she looks in a mirror, but it isn't reality.

LOL, I'm a stalker? Didn't you admit to using "the" trolldar? You are hilarious, hypocritical and psycho. Dahmer is charismatic and you need ketamine?

OP is a piece of filth.

Swarthy is its code for non-white.

Yes, a famous psychopath is charismatic and I have depression. Your point?

This is the best Meg has looked in a long, long time.

Have the dreadful duo flounced back to CA after being roundly booted? Can't wait to hear the Scabies spin on that.

You all constantly post things you claim you've found out about us by using the ignore function. You always claim to know our true identities, and frequently attempt to dox us.

That's why you don't get to cry when someone uses trolldar on you.

R152- Oh, imagine the drama on that flight home, 😂

I am not a Meghan fan. Having said that..

I think she looked good. I liked her outfit. Her makeup glowed. There is an air of desperation around them though. At least they broke the ice. Or they hope they did. Now we will see if Meghan whines or complains about how she was treated,

Has anyone else wondered if Harry might be bi-polar?

Charles looks worse in every event. He seems sad/mad and Camilla isn't even trying to cheer him. He almost looks a little drugged. Is Harry the cause? Andrew the cause? Is the Queens health the cause? Something is just not right with Charles. He didn't even laugh at the Bishops joke. He smirked.

R155 well the rumour going around is that the Queen has congestive heart failure which would suggest she isn't long for this world.

[quote] It’s amazing how obsessed the Brits are with the wife of the spare.

Harry is no longer the spare.

I'm not sure Lilibeth got to meet great gan, pretty sure a birthday party for a one year old wasn't high on Queenie's list. There is some question whether the spawn are even in London.

Ian't she required to end the jubilee by extinguishing the jubilee flame?

R155- Yes he does look bad. Unhappy, worried, idk. Both just seem to have checked out or something. Maybe he is worried and anxious about losing his mother? He hasn't seemed the same since Prince Philip died, tbh.

What is a scabies? These crazy bitches have their coded language like Qanon.

What can one do about puppet lines, when one is to the max with fillers?

My point was that if you find a serial killer charismatic you have some, er, major issues. You are also combative, angry and, yes, hypocritical.

[quote]Charles looks worse in every event.

He just sort of looks like a tired old man, but I guess think of it this way: you're finally getting the job you've waited for your entire life, but now you're in your 70s & slowing (way) down, it's on you to follow a *very* popular figure and keep the institution afloat while streamlining it for your son so he can keep it going when you're gone (which may be soon), making changes puts you at odds with almost everyone & your other troubled son is writing some poisonous book that might undo all the work you've done to rehabilitate your current wife's image. Your father just died in the past year & your mother is not far behind him.

I can see why he'd look weary

I thought a true enemy suggested the white coat which REALLY mead her look like a frig. the Only thing missing was harry trying to open it up & look for a cold beer inside. As Mom alsyas told my sister..Wear White Look Fat. And I'd especially with no waist, no neck & skinny legs. Bad move. the best ,but still unflattering & awful.

R162- Future plastic surgery victim? Do you think she will be?

R165: " Only thing missing was harry trying to open it up & look for a cold beer inside."

🤣🤣🤣🤣

I'm sorry but, what, R65? ESL?

[quote]which REALLY mead her look like a frig

It's "fridge," please. Not "frig." Don't ever say "frig" like this again, I beg of you.

The word at r65 is a racist slur, r168.

[quote] which REALLY mead her look like a frig.

???

Why fridge? Was sponge worn out?

Because of the cold insides.

R 65 here, sorry typing on my phone & was losing service & between DL spell check & mine, loads of Whoopsie's

The sleeves are too tight.

Does this woman own a mirror?

Is there no surgery that would cut away some kind of waist for Meg?

What's ironic is that the same ensemble would have looked AMAZING on Kate.

Even this trollop when she chose to wear clothes, wore well tailored outfits.

Not sure why you guys obsess over her looks. Harry is smitten and that's all that matters but why do you care so much?

Poosey!

OP's article compares Our Duchess to Jackie Kennedy.

More precisely, she is the modern iteration of the Duchess of Windsor.

Beauty, intelligence, style, exile.

At this point Harry looks more shell-shocked and bored than smitten.

R181 bahaha, thanks for the laugh! Poise!!!

R182- Harry looks disgusted.

Because she’s a swarthy, dirty-looking, skanky wog of a biracial woman, R179!

I will say that Charles’ lucked out getting daughter-in-laws that have rictus grins and deep lines around the mouth.

Sadly, the thick modeled one didn’t bother to replicate the weight loss secrets of her later mother-in-law and current sister-in-law.

Watch out R181, you said beauty. These fat royal watching hags live and breathe believing, and trying to make everyone else believe, that this Meghan gal is the ugliest, fattest thing to ever walk the earth.

You are her white knight, R186. How beautiful 😍

Now do you see how silly you sound at R187 OP? I am no white knight for merely saying you desperately want to make her out to be something she is not. How old are you? You come across as a very young frau especially with all the emojis.

Meg is as thin as she was on the day she was married. Some would say thinner.

R67 And, goodness knows, polls are always accurate!!!

Damn, wrong thread. LOL.

I can't get over the hooker walk up the stairs.

I will try hard, though.

R189- Yes, the blind.

The skank stroll must mean Netflix cameras were across the street

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Were William and Harry ever near each each in public?

Do people in the UK actually care so much about a seating chart R195? Bizarre.

It's fun - and useful - to work out who's who, r197.

They're all inbred and interchangeable R198. Most are ugly too.

Lots of claims being made the Harkles were cheered and videos released of them being booed were altered. The booing supposedly occurred when Boris Johnson arrived and the audio of that was edited into the Harry and Meghan videos.

Lol, no r200, it's quite obviously not the same booing. The clips don't even sound the same. Harry and Meghan are arrogant traitors who shat all over their family and the British people, yet present themselves as the true modern royals whom the people love. We don't like them, we boo them.

BP announced that Netflix was not accredited fior the Jubbly, and would be run off if they showed up.

re alleged doctored boos: Sunshine Sachs is in full crisis management mode, is all you need to know.

Why would you cheer or boo anyone in the family R201 but please do post these clips that you claim are nonsense. How would you know as they were not posted.

Caption this photo.

I'll go first with the unimaginative ..."the cat that ate the canary".

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

[quote] Lady Sarah Chatto may be a wonderful person, but she showed up AGAIN with no make-up and no eyebrows - not a good look.

She has absolutely no royal functions other than to do something like this every once in a great while to honor her aunt.

I am sure she does not care, so why should you? Just because someone's dead mother was famous does not mean she has to please you for the rest of her life.

Both Harry & his wife look uncomfortable. Outside, the Tindall’s are having none of it, smile and wait, as Harry & Meghan walk down the steps to boos.

On the way in, Prince Charles blew a kiss to Kate.

R204

I just don’t understand the hatred for this woman. She hasn’t murdered anyone, stolen, abused a child. Very bewildering. But carry on…..

Biting the hand that has fed you, given you fame, welcome & the position you always felt you deserved. Painted people as racist, when you have fled from you AA race your whole life.

The Daily Mail. You expect us to take a DM video of them seriously? Lol.

Does Camilla carry candy in her handbag?

So, that look on both their faces was because? They smelled a wet one Harry had just released & were embarrassed?

R211- Not one drop of gratitude or loyalty in either of them.

R210 No, she just lied about Britain's Head of State, tried to undermine the family that put her on the global map, perjured herself in court about colluding with the authors of that ridiculous book that trashed the family, and ,more recently, used children murdered only 48 hours earlier to get herself a photo op with her own photo crew on hand. She put the boot into a 95 year old woman who had been extraordinarily welcoming and generous to her, whilst the old lady was, literally, attending her dying husband.

Next to the latter, her recent behaviour at the polo grounds where she collided in a photo op that made it look like her husband's team had one when it hadn't . . . Seems a bit tame.

But you get the picture.

She's shallow, vicious, unlikable, and totally inauthentic.

She and her husband planned to defraud the UK taxpayers from the beginning.

And she treats underlings like dirt.

^*colluded (not collided)

Nevertheless, R211, the hatred is out of proportion to her supposed "crimes". She's not a serial killer and you don't know her personally. She's just a flawed human, like you, who married someone with a shit family. It happens all over the world every day. The frauen here daily proclaiming their hate are seriously disturbed individuals lashing out and they are also staggeringly hypocritical and contradictory.

R216- Excellent summation of this hideous excuse for a human being.

^ Omid, watch out if you get a Pinocchio to go with all the rest of your weird plastic surgery it will be tragic. Back up now, for your own sake.

R220- I thought I smelled the odor of melted flesh.

r47 How have they chosen not to be royalty when they won't give up their titles, cold call US senators using royal titles and have not asked to be removed from the line of succession?? Giving it up means fully including all of the vestiges.

r53 Direct line of succession is first heir Charles, second heir, William, third heir George Just as Anne is not in the direct line of succession neither is Harry. Yes he's high up in the order of succession but not the direct line. Your permission to marry point is neither here or there in terms of changing the technical and legal meaning of the direct line of succession.

r53 Why then if he wants to make his own way did Prince Harry complain about his Dad cutting off his money on Oprah? You are also arguing against the facts too.

Above post r224 meant for r54

If Harry and Meghan had been offered the chance to appear on the balcony yesterday they would have taken it and their defenders would have to find another way to rationalise it and make things try to fit and make sense.

R47 What doesn’t make sense, is Harry and Meghan coming to the US to escape, and then attempting to duplicate royal duties here.

If you look through the church photos, Harry doesnt look too thrilled at his wife's conversations. He has a bigger smile when talking to family. But I guess he has heard all her stories about yachts, Suits, and evil daddy already.

Any inside gossip on Megs' behaviour behind the scenes these days?

After all these years and all that's happened, Meghan still hasn't learnt how to behave at these events and is grinning her head off instead of looking dignified.

Scanning through the pictures from the Remembrance Day - why does M have that rictus grin on her face when people around her look solemn?

She really doesn't get it.

Perhaps that's why she didn't succeed much more in her career.

More photos from the church

It's the same insincere frozen smile no matter the occasion.

I think they look pretty happy and Relaxed unlike the rest of them that look pretty miserable. Do the English expect people to look miserable because that is what makes them look dignified?

R218 - Oh, god, save us from deluded Meganstans.

They aren't "supposed" crimes, and they weren't a "shit" family. She was panting to get into the shit family so she could finally get the global fame she hungered for all her life but couldn't get on her own merits.

And, "like you"?!

Sweetie, for my sins I am responsible, but never have I treated a soon to be widow so cruelly, gone on national television and told verifiable lies, perjured myself in court to hide my role in a book that trashed the family I thought should have treated me as if I were a future Queen, instead of the wife of the 6th in line, and used dead children as a photo op.

Those things happened, dear. Your refusal to acknowledge them by using the word "supposed" and "shit family" tells us exactly who you are.

She wanted to be a global celebrity, she is. Opinions gather around her.

Your position seems to be that absent murder, no celebrity should be disliked or held accountable for disgusting behaviour.

By their fruits ye shall know them.

[quote] Does Camilla carry candy in her handbag?

No: only dolls.

"Meghan, who was such a nice kid and then someone put her name in lights and turned her into a lush... she took the red pills..."

[quote] why does M have that rictus grin on her face when people around her look solemn?

Joker venom.

R233 Is there any chance you are on the spectrum? You appear to be unable to read facial expressions.

.......

[Caption this photo}

"They made us sit next to Jack since no one else wants in on his Portugal retirement condo scheme"

These two losers are actually buying upvotes and comments on the DM site. They get dumber as the days go by.

Were there any foreign royals there? They probably wouldn't have spoken to Megain and Harry anyway.

Yes, poor, dear miserably Kate, smiling away as she sports the Queen's pearl and diamond earrings . . .

Whatever is making Kate miserable, please, sir, I'd like some.

Does anyone think H&M will divorce soon? I do. He will never accept any blame, but this is probably the first time he has realized the damage he had done and that there is no going back to the position he once held in his family and with the public. Idk, just thinking.

Has Meghan called Oprah yet for an Interview Part Deux or will she wait until she's back in Montecito? After all, in England Meg's phone is probably tapped.

No, I don't think 'H&M will divorce soon.' They were sporting microphones to record for their reality show FFS -- how does that seem like evidence of relationship fracturing?

As far as I know, the only thing she’s done wrong is open her window to show her smug mug. That’s extremely mild.

But it comes hot on the heels of the fake polo show and the most egregious thing she’s ever done — the Uvalde Show. I think if you defend THAT debacle, you’re as vile as she is.

They will pour their rage into Harry's book R244.

R247- Do you know that cunts like you add layers of the dislike we feel onto her? I know you are getting paid to defend this filth, but you only make people hate her more. Good job.

R243 No. He's allowed himself to be cornered. He cant go home again. And without Meghan, he loses what anchors him to life outside the BRF. He'll have to double down.

In for a penny, in for a pound.

The real question is, will his bitterness infect the marriage.

And would she leave him because of that. I think even Meghan after this is beginning to realise that the value of that title is diminishing and that what she needs is money.

Harry Thunder face. The look on Lady Sarah's face.. I wonder what he said.

IMO, Harry is weak-minded and is not having these "realizations" that people think he is having.

R223, the definition of direct line of succession, per the agreement of 2013, pertains to the heirs of the body of QEII. The indirect line begins at the Queen’s nephew, the Viscount Severn followed my Sarah Chatto.

I don’t make the rules and neither do you.

R250- Geez! Harry looking like a spoiled man-child and Markle looking demonic. What a waste of flesh those two are.

"Meghan, we are INSIDE the church you can let go of my hand now..."

I misspoke at R252, the first indirect heir is the Earl Snowden.

R254- My God, how can he stand that?

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

r252 I think you are confusing direct line and straight line .The 2013 act is mainly just an update to allow females born thereafter to have an equal first claim to the throne as males because Prince William was due to be a father but sex of child was unknown.

I think she was the only one who was wearing gloves. I don't see anyone else wearing or holding gloves.

What did Harry expect? Seriously. He looks as if he has been betrayed or something! Is it even possible that he is too stupid or maybe mentally ill to realize how much damage his behavior has caused TRF? Has he forgotten the disgraceful way they acted at Prince Phillip's funeral? How utterly disrespectful?

r260 Perhaps just too spoilt to grasp consequences?

R261- That must it but I didn't think it possible to be that spoiled until now.

Question: why did Megz put the gloves on after she sat down?

So sick of these fucking stupid frau threads on a gossip site for gay men. Why don't you grannies fuck off to Tattle Life? They let you be racist there and even let you use the word 'cunt' to describe all the women you hate, and the threads move much faster than they do here.

'Harry’s bald spot is getting bigger'

Nowhere near as big as William's though, which covers his entire head.

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

R266- Yes, his expressions were very telling. Embarrassment, dread, disgust, then to extreme anger.

Outside the church, Catherine was holding a pair of gloves next to her clutch, but I don't recall seeing any pictures with gloves on.

There was not one single other couple there who held hands or touched each other inside or outside the church. They're in an arrested state of development. I do think some of the hand on the back gestures were to soothe the cranky baby, but I believe most the physical contact is about exerting power and dominance over him. She's the one initiating the hand holding and she clutches on dearly. Outside of this event, I've seen several photos and videos where she pulls him in her direction away from others when he's clearly mid-conversation. She's even wiped his face as a mother would a toddler.

I don't think I've see such a pronounced side eye as Lady Sarah's at r250. Her iris is all the way to the corner of her eye!

r268 What do you think was going through Lady Sarah Chattos mind?

I feel sorry for Charles. He's at the age when 99% of Brits are retired and now he has to gear up for the biggest job of his life instead of kicking back and taking it easy. The job of king is far more age appropriate for William who's in his prime yet he has to take a back seat for another two decades. What a fucked up inistitution.

FUCK OFF SURVIVING KLAN GRANNY

^Why do I have to walk next to the toxic duo? Didn't I suffer enough with my own parents, FFS?

r243 I geniunely find it difficult to decide.I think its possible, indeed likely , their relationship is bad and worsening.It could be a very unhappy marriage but out of stubborness they stay together for a little while yet?

She thinks she’s at the Miss America pageant. Did she put Vaseline on her teeth, too?

Please don't let Harry near the other senior royals as I don't want the repeat of the Nepalese royal family. The raging jealousy in his eyes is very terrifying and I know he could destroy the BRF.

At least Andrew had the good sense to pretend to have Covid. He’s probably having a good jolly at home, breathing a sigh of relief that he didn’t have to deal with the booing and stern looks.

R273- Personally, I have always believed that they made more of a business deal then a real marriage by mutual agreement. That being said, going there was the worst decision they could have made, imo. They must have the dusting of royalty for their brand (whatever the hell that is at this point) Their downgrade, so to speak, in TRF was on public display for all to see, whereas had they not gone there people would only still be guessing about their royal status with in the family. They blew it. Totally and forever. No BS Sunshine Sachs fake PR media lies about conversations with TRF over Zoom or whatever will fly now. People know better because we all saw it with our own eyes. They were not wanted there.

Oh my goodness, enlarge the photo at r266 at take a look at the lady between Meghan's right shoulder and the vicar. Either she's suffered from a stroke or her mouth is pursed and twisted in disgust.

Hard to say, SA/R269. Such a weird picture because there are three seemingly incongruous facial expressions/emotions. Harry's anger, Meghan's beatific smile, and what looked at first as confusion or disbelief on Lady Sarah's part. I didn't notice how severe Sarah's side eye is until I enlarged the picture. It was more than WTF on her face. I think Harry may have acted out more than the picture let's on, maybe voiced his irritation or made an unkind comment.

I think it's hard to say whats going on through her mind because Sarah is known to be a very kind and lovely person. Folks like that tend to be less critical or try to give the benefit of the doubt. She doesn't have much contact with Harry so all of the stories about him may have come to make sense or hit her there in the church. "Ah, so this is what everyone has been talking about." mixed in with some disgust? As another poster mentioned she's a favorite of the Queen, who was a second mother to her while Margaret was traipsing the world and having flings. She would have been hurt on HM's behalf.

All conjecture, of course.

I’m picturing Doria at home: “They’re all going to laugh at you!”

R279- Dirty pillows!

I don’t know how anyone can see this trip as a triumph for the Sussexes. But some do. I don’t know how anyone can see Meghan’s trip to Uvalde as altruism, but some do.

R278- They look like demented toddlers.

That look in Harry's eyes in that shot with Lady Chatto, whew, such hatred. Thank God he is in Monteshitto,. Long may Friar Harry Tuck reign in his kingdom there. If he did meet with Charles, I don't think it went is way at all. The boos were totally a shock. Loved how Zara read the crowd & made sure they descended all on their very own. Smart girl, she knew what was coming.The as*s licking press can skew it all they want. The more they deny it, the more negative stuff will come out.

if they were smart they would leave now, say one of the kids is sick.

R283- COVID can be quite convenient.

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Hey Harkles, when play stupid games, you win stupid prizes.

Angry and bitter, party of two.

Looking at that photo of Harry it is very easy to believe that he can be a very violent person. I'm just saying. That isn't in anyway normal for an adult, royally spoiled or not.

Anne wore gloves.

[quote]Harry and Meghan are arrogant traitors who shat all over their family and the British people

That's pathetic.

As to the altered video claims, there are dozens of videos taken straight from the live stream that do not have booing, and plenty of royal reporters who said they didn't hear booing, either. The person here who claims to have been at the Jubilee and heard booing was also saying they didn't care that much one way or the other, but they were, in actuality, all over the Meghan and Harry threads, posting constant insults and slurs about them.

The problem is, you cannot trust anything the haters say. They lie all the time, fake photos, post inaccurate videos which, when called on it, they claim were simply funny fan vids. This makes it easy for people on Twitter to say that the video of the boos was altered. It's believable, because it's happened before.

[quote]These two losers are actually buying upvotes and comments on the DM site.

This is all just some kind of collaborative hate fiction for you ladies, isn't it? Even if it were true, you'd never know about it.

How likely do you think it would be for them to sue the Daily Mail, win, and then turn around and pay them for good PR by "buying upvotes?" The Mail wouldn't ever agree to any such thing, not after losing the lawsuit.

Sure, Jan. The photos are fake, the videos are doctored, we are making all of this up just to malign the saintly H&M!

My god all that protocol: you sit here, you wear this, you follow... You're just clowns.

The repugnant English class system survives.

Chuck, Willie and Georgie will have a dreadful accident together, and I'll be Queen.

They're being treated far better than I ever was.

The Prodigal Son and his grifter off-sider returned because their sources of income are fast dwindling. And they are finally starting to realize that they are a couple of juvenile delusionals with absolutely nothing to offer. So it was the better part of wisdom to show up, down their bitter brew of humiliation - boos, exclusion, ostracism - and acknowledge in their subdued behavior that yes, the Queen was absolutely spot on and they were absolutely wrong. A couple of tarts, who are happy to debase themselves, for future possible gain. And their chugging down that brew of humiliation means that gain may now be forthcoming. Somewhat.

All respect to the Queen and her advisers. Well played, Ma'am! Very well played!

Erratum R295 advisOrs

The photos here aren't faked, it's just that you're saying that they show Meghan about to cry in humiliation, but they don't.

And go out to Twitter yourself. Everyone else is right, there are tons of videos without a single boo heard. There are royal reporters who were there who never heard a boo.

[quote]Yes, a famous psychopath is charismatic and I have depression. Your point?

I'm not the person who said this, although you'll surely claim that I am, but for me, it points to why you're doing this. That Ketamine thread is fucking overflowing with your serious mental illness issues. You're angry at everything and everyone -- by your own words -- and it all comes out here, in these threads. Screaming, lying, making shit up, pestering people day in and day out, calling names, accusing people of random shit, being racist, pretending to be a gay guy who wants to fuck serial killers, you do it all because you think that demeaning others shows you're superior and in control, but you're not.

It's the reason you're always claiming that you're being targeted by Meghan's PR. You feel worthless and lonely, and pretending like someone famous cares about you personally makes you feel better. You think you're hurting her and Harry personally, but the truth is that they don't know you exist, and if they did know, they wouldn't care, because this whole board is a cesspool, largely because of people like you.

You want the same people that you call names over here to go over to your stupid self-pity Ketamine thread and help you out. Pathetic.

I actually thought Meghan looked really good, the color and overall style suited her and the situation as well as anything could have. She and Harry both looked miserable, but if they want to return for the Queen’s funeral, they had to show up to honor her while she’s still alive.

Zara, Bea and Eugenie had obviously done some pre-event strategizing, they were friendly but not overly so. Seating Meghan next to Sarah Chatto was a masterful move. Sarah is very close to the Queen and Charles, yet isn’t entangled in the firm so she can be seen as somewhat neutral.

Sarah Chatto is very pretty but, as a poster above noted, her lack of eyebrows is rather unsettling. Some face powder and lip gloss would work wonders. She has a lovely figure still and her outfit was perfect.

Speaking of which, Sophie Wessex has got FAT. She’s got the body of a hospital cafeteria cashier. The pink sparkly dress did her no favors. I wonder if she is a holy terror as a mother? Louise always seem more comfortable with her dad.

The Duke of Kent looks like he has one foot in the grave, as does his younger brother and sister-in-law.

Charles did not look good. He seems to be shrinking into a non-entity as all eyes gravitate towards William and Kate. The kiss he blew to Kate was very sweet.

Where are they staying while in London? Are they being housed in the Tower of London as a bit of a laugh?

My money is on them making a quick-stop at Frog Cottage to gather their things (and possibly children) and then just driving straight to the airport, after all those boos.

Markle looks like a fucking refrigerator in that ill-fitting, ugly coat.

It's not about a "class system" idiot at r292. It's about not trying to make yourself the centre of attention and showing respect for the people - two things that Meghan Markle has no fucking clue about.

[quote]The job of king is far more age appropriate for William who's in his prime yet he has to take a back seat for another two decades. What a fucked up inistitution.

Once he gets the job, likely within a year, I'm guessing he last 6-10 years at best. He's not in the best of health and as others have aptly noted, things seem to be unraveling for Harry & it's only a matter of time before Chuck has to pick up the pieces for him in some way -and that's in addition to all the post QEII changes he'll have to make to streamline the monarchy & hold off the critics. If Camilla's health fails for some reason, he won't last 6 months after she's gone. It seems kind of tragic when you think about it, but I guess that's just the way things go.

That would make Will & Kate's kids teens/young teens and they'll all be very attractive, so a group of young people following Charles will seem like a breath of fresh air. So I don't think Wills will be an old man when he takes over, which is why he's really stepped up his game in recent years.

Yeah…the continuum of the BRF will be based on the attractiveness of children.

I guess we forget the Windsors have a season of irresistible bloom before they lapse into faded glory. Prince Edward and the late THE Princess Margaret, Countess Snowden are shining examples of this.

Let’s just hope the kids don’t have any developmental delays that become obvious as they grow or, even worse…have intolerable personas that don’t adapt well to public service. Not holding my breath but miracles do occur.

R207, Oh, puhleeze. The comment is about her not as a "royal" but as a woman appearing in public, a very, very large public.

Sarah no doubt spent more than five minutes choosing her outfit. Did she bother looking in the mirror? Sure, she's "fresh-faced," and more's the pity.

I cannot abide women who are deliberately plain and unattractive.

R305, One thing seems in the future of George and Louis: their father's nose. Both have his childhood pinched-in area that presages adult elongation.

Maybe Louis the brunette will at least escape the baldness gene!

R304, Don't count those royal chickens. Charles not only has excellent longevity genes; he also has a lifetime of keeping physically fit.

William might very well be in his mid-50s before his own coronation.

I heard booing as they left the church. Also heard cheers.

It also depends where in an audience/crowd you are. I’ve been part of a booing crowd, and when I saw footage of the event, the audio only recorded cheering. A cynical person might conclude that “friendly” individuals might be placed near reporters to cheer loudly and drown out the sound of a group 20 feet away.

No one was planted so they could record fake cheers. No one knew ahead of time that a group of people were going to go to the trouble to attend the Jubilee just to boo Meghan and Harry.

The Queen was reportedly very upset after meeting Lilibet, and took to her bed.

Of course they were booed. Loudly. The only proof anyone needs is to look at the expressions on their face. That reveals the truth.

For those doubting the booing, CTV News in Canada has stated they were booed. Also there is an NBC News clip of them coming down the stairs and you can definitely hear booing. Some cheers as well, it was certainly mixed.

It’s PR 101, for fucks sake. If your client is making a public appearance, you make sure the cameras see the fans clamoring for an autograph, the fans holding up signs, cheering, etc. You get photos of them interacting sweetly with the adoring public. And you don’t focus on protestors or hecklers.

But okay, it’s some kind of conspiracy.

[quote]If your client is making a public appearance, you make sure the cameras see the fans clamoring for an autograph, the fans holding up signs, cheering, etc.

At the Jubilee?!

Markle as usual had the same degree of pasted on smile throughout, and Henry looked angry and out of his head, also as usual. The cold shoulders and booing were icing on the cake.

Catherine might live to see four monarchs on the throne: EIizabeth, Charles, Wm, and maybe even, with Kate's being a widow, her son as King George.

(So might many others see, but only she would also have been Queen!)

Harry should have married almost anyone else.

R312 is right. Their faces reflected what they heard.

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

R311 - There is quite enough to mock with the Sussexes without posts like these making fun of children's looks - any children.

I wonder if being booed will cause anything close to an understanding of their behavior’s consequences? Or will they just double down on their feelings of bad treatment? Harry lived long in the warm bath of public adoration, so it must have stung.

So, how does everyone think H&M are feeling right now? Any lasting lessons learned? Lasting damage?

Nothing learned, more revenge to come.

R326, and I’m here to watch for it!

I'm still amazed that after all they've done, they were allowed to attend the jubilee. Henry VIII knew how to deal with treacherous relatives.

I have the vile bitch on ignore, but has anyone heard from the Klan Granny Troll? Should someone do a wellness check?

R328 I was thinking the same thing last night. They're lucky the Tower of London is a museum now.

Sabrina’s mom, Crystol is posting on DL.

Glad to see she finds time between concussions.

The incessant blinking of H & M. They KNOW.

Lessons learned? No no no no. They're victims, remember? I'm sure we'll soon hear the latest update about their vurtuous victimhood. Just you wait.

Given the angry face on Harry in St Paul's, his bitchy remarks about the Queen needing his protection and refusing to say whether he missed his father and brother shortly after visiting the Queen, where I suspect he was informed of the plans, I doubt anything stuck.

Harry and Meghan are the kind of people who have never, ever, taken responsibility for their own mistakes. He's been coddled by courtiers who cleaned up his messes, she's never once doubted herself or her behaviour.

These are mental issues that events do not penetrate.

Virtuous *^

^If anything, these events cemented their sense of victimisation.

That's fine. It's time the BRF stopped trying to pacify them, protected itself from them by any means necessary, and let them stew in their own juices. Appeasement never works. It only encourages more aggression.

I think the next hearing on Harry's case re his security at the High Court is early next week, Monday or Tuesday? If the High Court agrees with the Home Office, I predict Harry really will give up on Britain, using that as an excuse. Either way, it will drag on as the Home Office digs its heels in.

After the court hearing, Bowers' book is going to be their next rough patch.

If Bowers addresses the bullying allegations, we'll need three more threads to cover it the screaming headlines.

If anything could be more humiliating than the booing, being kept off the balcony, the seating in St Paul's, the exclusion from the huge star studded Buck House concert party tonight has to be it.

Even the other second tier royals like the Yorks are there.

The message is clear.

Harry doing his worst in that memoir will look like the surest of sour grapes.

Having seen his petulant expressions, I'm sure he will seek petty revenge in either a post-Jubilee interview or a bitchy rewriting of his upcoming memoir and I am totally here for it.

R329 Maybe we should ask her if she's ok.

Whether they were invited to the luncheon or concert or not, it would not be a good look for them to be voluntarily enjoying entertainment while Thomas Markle is partially paralyzed and unable to speak in a San Diego hospital. Their presence at Trouping or the church service under such circumstances wouldn't be questioned. If they showed their faces at the concert (which I believe they were invited to) and her father died or worsens soon after? Oh, my, the outrage would be off the charts.

(govt officials including Priti Patel - didn't she criticize Harry's request for security

R340 Markle, Sr., has been home from hospital for at least a week, being cared for by his two other children.

They were not invited to the Guildhall to prevent them from trying to get a photo op with William, Kate, Charles, and Camilla.

And, because of the many politicos there. Pritte Patel is the Home Secretary, and it is the Home Office Harry is suing to get the British taxpayer to pay for his extravagant security "needs".

There was no way they would have allowed the Harkles at that reception. This entire visit was structured to keep the Sussexes from being able to monetise their connection to the BRF, especially its star players, by getting photo ops with them.

And that's also why they weren't at the concert.

They were told before they came that the price of getting their daughter to meet Great Gran and get even a private photo of that, was that they were to keep a low profile and not try to overshadow what is likely the Queen's last great celebration of her reign.

They needed the invite, the acknowledgement that they were still part of the family. But I don't think they quite expected the glaring, Yes, but the B-List side of the family trumpeted to the world, let alone the booing at the cathedral.

^*Pritti (not Pritte) Patel

The Royals said no to Kim Karadashian begging for tickets.

I didn't know that Thomas is home from the hospital. He could still go any day

[quote]And, because of the many politicos there. Pritte Patel is the Home Secretary, and it is the Home Office Harry is suing to get the British taxpayer to pay for his extravagant security "needs".

Yep, I was going to get into this, decided to leave it out and forgot to edit out that last sentence fragment. The reception was "free range," with people milling about and on a live feed. I could absolutely see Harry thinking it would be a good idea to corner Patel and personally plead his case, much as he did Iger at the Lion King premier to hustle work for his wife.

With structured seating and security at the concert, it would have been easier to keep the brothers separated.

r341 What would the name be for a 75th jubilee as there was a 25th jubilee in 1977?

R345 diamond jubilee

r346 I thought diamond jubilee was 60 years ie the 2012 one?

[quote]I'm still amazed that after all they've done, they were allowed to attend the jubilee. Henry VIII knew how to deal with treacherous relatives.

[quote] I was thinking the same thing last night. They're lucky the Tower of London is a museum now.

I know you don't care because you're having fun with your hate, but this is not normal. Normal people don't see the relatively boring Harry and Meghan and wish death on them.

Where were they booed?

Were they at the Saturday concert?

OMG!!! Michelle Obama zoomed in to congratulate the Queen. And Michelle is no longer on speaking terms with sMEGs either.

It's like a kick in the cunt bone to sMEGs!

They were cheering for Cersei, I think I heard the church bells ringing!

They were roundly booed both entering and leaving St Paul's.

No they weren't at the concert.

And they didn't "decline". Megh as n would have sold her soul to be part of that shindig last night.

Has anyone actually officially stated the Queen met Lilibet in person in England?

[quote] OMG!!! Michelle Obama zoomed in to congratulate the Queen.

I vanted to vish da Queen a Happy Jupilee too but I vas told she doesn't go on Chaturbate or xHamster.

Harry is done. The big funeral will be his final visit, not his father's coronation. Because, from the looks of things, not his father nor his brother said word one, not even in greeting, to Harry.

And there were no Archie and Lilibet there, or there would have been a snap or two at the airport. The children will not further interact with their royal cousins.

Hope you like California, Harry.

I didn't see any black ones.

R356, Harry will get an invitation to his father's and brother's coronations because he is family and their son/brother. These are not personal invitations, they are politeness/protocol invitations. His presence will be as limited as his presence at the jubilee.

R358 After this weekend, I wonder if he will bother to attend? It doesn’t seem good for his mental health to join public family events, reduced to a second tier hanger-on.

Are they back to Monteshito already?

[quote]reduced to a second tier hanger-on.

Reduced by his very own direct hand. Will he ever acknowledge this?

^No. Radical self-entitlement that goes back to his problems with his mother is the hallmark of both Harry and his wife. And hers goes back to how her father raised Meghan.

These early imprints are nearly impossible to dislodge.

I wonder if Charles and the Queen are quietly negotiating financial arrangements for the kids to bring about something of a cessation of hostilities.

I suppose we'll find out when Harry's memoir come out.

I don't believe it was put back just so he could include some tinsel from the Jubilee.

If he trashes the family again, we'll know he got nothing, doesn't care any longer, and it's all over, anyway.

If it's much milder than the public Hope's, I would venture that he's been assured of a place in his father's will if he behaves, or his children will.

R361, he's an adult and doesn't owe you or anyone else an explanation.

1) I think the poster meant would Harry ever acknowledge it to himself, and 2) this is a gossip site.

I can't help but wonder if this is going to end with a call to the Sta. Barbara County sheriff's office if their internal security can't handle what might be coming around the bend.

[QUOTE] At least Andrew had the good sense to pretend to have Covid. He’s probably having a good jolly at home, breathing a sigh of relief that he didn’t have to deal with the booing and stern looks

Andrew is the only senior royal who's going to be enjoying a normal retirement. Charles, William, Kate and their kids will be in shackles until their 90s.

I've been saying this since just after Ginger Megs marriage that Megs is going to end up killing both her kids. They are props in her on-going drama. She has little feeling for them, just as Doria had little feeling for her.

[quote]The incessant blinking of H & M. They KNOW.

They know that they're hated? Yes, obviously. That's why they asked for extra security, which enraged every one of you, as you insisted that they didn't need the security. If I recall, several of us said it was far more likely that you simply didn't want them to have security, in hopes that something bad would happen. As these threads progress, that gets proven true time and again.

[Quote]That's why they asked for extra security,

In that case, Meghan rolling down the bullet proof window was a resolute act of bravery so that the paps (or assassins) lining the street could get that perfect shot of the sixth in line and his beloved...

Oh how the salty Markle stan tears flow.

Weren't there reports that Haz and Meg met with Charles and Camilla at Clarence House? At any rate, it seems that the senior royals went above and beyond to ensure there were no possible public photo opportunities with them that the Harkles could leverage for their Netflix show.

There's no 'reports except for feverish frau extrapolation.

R368, AMEN. Some of these old cunts on here need to be watched as they seem dangerous. They froth and seethe in rage and it seems to be getting worse. Of course they need security because I wouldn't be surprised if these lunatic megaloons didn't hop a flight from the UK to stalk them in CA.

The rage here is way over the top. If they expended this much energy into hating the right people the world might be a slightly better place.

Do we know if H/M have friends? At one point they were hobnobbing with some A listers—Oprah, Clooney, Elton, Williams sisters—but never see them pictured with anyone other than Nacho, the polo guy. Don’t see them with non-celeb friends, either.

So you 'see the Markles in a non-celeb setting then?

How likely is it that people avoided Mrs. & Mrs. Markle at the church service partly out of concern that they were wearing wires?

She was really swinging her fat booty walking up the church stairs.

R367 I really think that's off the wall.

Not least as those kids are her only real negotiating cards on a split.

r368 Dear oh dear major extrapolation and big leap there from people hating how they have behaved to people wanting to kill them. Virtually no one who hates them has any plans or wish to kill them . You are drawing up the wrong dots with those silly accusations and requests. Lots of people on here hate Mitch McConnell or Ellen DeGeneres etc but nobody has tried to kill them have they?

I think it’s very possible Meghan is a good mother. I have a family member who is a holy terror to everyone who crosses her path, but is completely devoted to her child and her pets. She has her reasons for being fucked up (abused and neglected as a child)

Cutting your kids off from almost all sides of their family is hardly the sign of a good mother, r380, especially when one side is as unique as it is. She's probably charming with her kids, but the choices she's making for her kids are atrocious.

I agree it would be better to have some kind of relationship with the extended family. But it’s possible Harry truly thinks the royal family is a toxic environment. Whether that’s objectively true, who knows. But he could think he’s doing the kids a favor.

Any toxicity comes from Harry himself - everyone else in that family is just fine with it. Harry and his wife and kids could easily visit a couple of times a year so that the kids have some time with their great-grandma grandpa, uncle and cousins and enjoy their personal family and national heritage.

Meghan has also cut herself and her kids off from their grandfather, for which there is no excuse. Those kids have two living grandfathers and don't know either of them.

Exactly what r383 said. Charles is busy, but not THAT busy. He would have made time to see the Sussex grandchildren, if Harry had asked. There would have been ample security for them, and I’m sure he would have moved mountains to make a personal visit happen. He’s a big softie.

They’re withholding the children as some sort of leverage, and it’s foul.

The one picture they needed was with gran-gran and apparently they didn't get it.

Do we have confirmation on what they were invited to? I imagine they were invited to the party Saturday night but didn’t attend. Do we have any inside intel?

Someone remind the moron that so far, death threats and in fact one police action based on a public knife threat against Camila Tominey for criticising Meghan have come from Meghan's psycho fans.

Harry asserted that he was a prime "terrorist target", demanding that he be given information by MI5 that even his fuckinf father and brother get.

Harry's "security" issues are just another aspect of his obsession with being as important as his brother - who, by the way, is a far higher grade terrorist target than the now irrelevant Sussexes.

His bloody wife rolled down a bullet proof window to get a photo OP of herself smiling at crowds.

Read some of the shirts posted about the Queen, the Cornwalls, and Wiiliam and Kate by the Sussex Squad and those mental cases on Celebitchy.

Then come talk to us about Harry's security issues.

^* that even his father and brother don't get

shit, not shirts

The cuckoo who thinks we're all out to kill Meghan made death threats against me in my other thread. I think that's called projection? When you think others would act the way you would.

r385, you're new here?

[quote]Cutting your kids off from almost all sides of their family is hardly the sign of a good mother

You guys are constantly demanding the BRF cut Harry off completely, punish him, refuse to speak to him, isolate him, and humiliate him. Just look at the title of this thread. Then you turn around and say that Harry's two children not being in constant contact with their grandfather and great-grandmother is abuse, and proves that Harry and Meghan are terrible parents who shouldn't be allowed to cut off contact with their family like that.

R391 don't twist our words. Harry should be treated coldly for what he did, INCLUDED preventing his children from seeing their relatives. He and his wife acted badly and very hurtfully. Do you expect them to be praised for that? Your comments make no sense.

Oh Dear! Someone seems to be missing...

Megaloons like R391 live in an alternate reality. Sad.

I've noticed that people who like and support Meghan and Harry tend to be like them - narcissistic, immature, superficial and mean. They don't like obligations and consequences and get mad when their celebrity avatars get to face any.

There's nobidy 'missing on the 2nd balcony appearance. It was announced that the heirs would be the feature. George looked very smart and not so shy, Charlotte of course was never shy, and Louis was quieted down. Her Maj was beautiful in green. Lovely pageant, and I guess the weekend is over, besides the drinking,?

Have there been any pics of Lilibet?

R397 Nary a one except for that first one they released as their Christmas greeting, but taken when she was just a couple of months old.

R398, it would be nice if they released one of her with the Queen.

Oh STFU R391. If you think your family is toxic you do indeed cut off access to your children. It's not child abuse, it's protecting your children.

The BRF was intent on not allowing the Sussexes to use the BRF to commercialise further their "brand". If a photo was taken of Lilibet with the Queen, in the Queen's home, then the photographer would have been the Queen's, and the photo will belong to the Queen, and if it exists, I'm sure the Queen will release it at some point.

But the point of this exercise was to stop the Sussexes from doing what they've been doing since they flouned out: marketing themselves via the monarchy. The monarchy can't afford to be cheapened in that way.

So, this time, the Sussexes were blocked from using the Queen, the Cambridges, Charles, Windsor, etc., to use to market themselves or to provide content to Netflix.

It there's a photo, it will be at the Queen's discretion when it appears.

I agree r391, which is why I don't know why people have a problem with Meghan cutting off her abusive father and half-sister.

Apologies, r402 was for r400. I'm r391 and was replying to their comment to me.

There's no problem with Markle cutting off her father, same way she and Dim shouldn't have a problem with a boot in their flat behinds from the BRF. That's the way it goes.

r400: I've read your posts and we agree on everything. I'm also R368. You misread what I wrote at r391. Save your "STFU" for people who deserve it next time.

I was replying to the person R391 quoted. Hate doing this on a mobile.

Anyway, the megaloons are the worst hypocrites.

Of course Lady C. has something to say.

^This cunt and her PR minions. I have gone from tolerating her to loathing.

R408, I can't stand him either!

When did Thomas Markle become abusive? Before or after he paid Meg's way through Northwestern?

Don't know don't care. The Markles are all liars.

R410 - You beat me to it. God, that man spoiled her to death, to the detriment of his two other children. He treated her like gold, busted his arse to send her to nice schools and get out of Northwestern debt-free, and she had nothing but nice things to say about him . . . until she started dating royalty.

He sent that letter to the press when he saw himself defamed by the PEOPLE Magazine "friends" who left out the harsher language Meghan had used in it toward him.

The DM was stupid and printed more than the allowable 33% of the letter, but ffs, he was within his rights to defend himself from the slanted hagiography in that ridiculous article.

He should have gotten a lawyer then.

It’s pretty clear Thomas Markle is very “off.” It’s not a stretch to assume Meghan has her reasons for cutting him off.

Doesn’t mean she isn’t also an asshole.

^So, Meghan's lying is genetic? Not her fault. Its that genetic pain Harry knows so well. I am so grateful he is there to help he with this. Truly what a match made in heaven.

The Markles are two peas in a pod.

She looks fine. It's the royals that look pissy.

She "looks like" she had a half gallon of bronze spackle placed upon the fillers.

R416 Yes,we could tell from the boos the Sussexes got compared to the roaring cheers the royals got, who looks "pissy" to the public.

I'll have whatever you and the other delusional Meghanstans are having.

Anyone who has had a narc parent or relative knows that those two kids aren't being treated well at home. Thank goodness they have nannies so they will get some affection in their lives.

'Narc has about as much gravity as 'iconic these days. And a nannie is no guarantee of quality.

Yes, R393,that little shit, Louis.

Oops, there he is...

Poor Louis really is a little retarded. He even smacked Kate in the mouth.

R423 = an idiot who thinks referencing a 4-year-old child is a snappy retort.

R421, if by "little shit" you mean Harry, of course he wasn't there. Little Louis was though, looking very cute and being well-behaved during the big moment, along with his brother and sister, mum and dad, grandad and step-granny and, of course, his great-grandma, who obviously loves him very much. She must get such delight from being able to spend these precious years with him.

If he’s slow, he’s slow, R424. There’s no crime in that if it’s true and this is a gossip site. If you don’t like it, leave.

I think Louis will provide more fodder in the coming days and will ultimately outshine “Dim”.

Nobody can outdim Dim. He's a treasure that way.

Kate openly supported her brothers issues with depression. In fact Harry & William did a video with her about MI issues. If Louis is challenged, it will not be swept under the rug. Eugenie wore garments showing her back surgery scar. Lady Louse's eye issues weren't swept under the rug. There is no longer a need to pretend Royals don't have issues. If Louis has issues it will be a win/win for them as they publicly embrace it. However he appeared to be a tired, overstimulated 4year old in a grown up situation for too long. As a doting uncle & with many cousins, I've seen this before. I can't tell you how many times I pulled a cousins hair. Hell, even Grealish gets a good hair pull now & then. Time will tell.

Louis doesn't have "issues" but there are many people jealous people here who do.

Louis will grow up fine, but I would not want to be the person to tell him he ISN'T the spare.

I picture him defiling Gan-Gan's grave when he is created the Duke of Liverpool.

Liverpool is out as there’s already an Earl, R430.

Oh, and if Georgie is going to be heir presumptive, why not create Charlotte a Marquess? Henry VIII made Anne Boleyn the Marquess of Pembroke shortly before their marriage, the first English woman made a peer in her own right.

And I suggested Liverpool because it is on the list of ugly and unlivable places in England.

Just postulating...

If Anne is dead by the time William inherits the throne, the new King can name Charlotte Princess Royal.

The Princess Royal title is given to the eldest daughter of the sovereign.

Boy, does Harry ever look miserable leaving Britain. He looks lost in thought. Deep down, I think he knows that he badly screwed up but he'll never admit it when he's still with Meghan.

Just move on, Harry. After the two books about your royal life and your Netflix royal related reality series are done, move on man!

99% of Brits would rather live by the ocean in sunny Montecito than beneath the Heathrow flight path in Windsor, and that 99% includes William and Kate. Meghan and Harry are living the dream.

I thought he was on the phone in that DM photo, trying to do damage control before he even got on the plane

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

I think Harry and Meghan are on the right track in wanting to set up their own “thing” in California.

But they are going about it all wrong.

The BRF is inherently very dysfunctional. One kid gets the keys to the kingdom, the other is fucked over. That has to do a number on anyone.

The problem is Harry and Megs expect to be given everything. If they were willing to sacrifice and work, it might be very different.

They could do great, grass-roots work in affordable housing, for example. Santa Barbara County is begging for activism in this area. But it’s not glamorous and it’s probably tedious. So, they’re not interested.,

[quote] Harry’s bald spot is getting bigger

r22 It's called Trichotillomania. It's gotten worse since he has been married.

^I've never read about Harry/tricho anywhere, and know that untrue rumors are regularly dumped here, so where is the proof? He's naturally almost BALD, shining like the North Star in St. Paul's.

Well how can they advocate for affordable housing when they live in a Russian-mobster-subsidized tacky McMansion with 14 bathrooms?

They don’t want to walk the walk. Buy an old, historic property (or whatever passes as such in meathead California.) Sponsor scholarships at local preschools and universities. Start a reading / book program. Sponsor an exhibit at the Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History.

One problem among many is Meghan likely doesn’t feel at ease among the Santa Barbara old money crowd. She’s really only comfortable among other Instagram skanks.

Harry’s no genius either. He really needed to marry someone who would prop him up— not someone as tacky and vacuous as himself.

So, here we are.

If Charles weren’t so clueless and focused on his tampon, he could have assessed Harry’s needs and guided him.

One wonders how much the family tried to introduce “suitable” mates to Harry. Not much, I’m guessing.

The BRF seems an odd combination of very formal and stifling ways of life coupled with wildly indifferent parenting.

Those things don’t go together.

[quote] Harry’s no genius either. He really needed to marry someone who would prop him up— not someone as tacky and vacuous as himself. So, here we are.

It's like having two bottoms and no top.

Or, like a top and a vagina…aka W&K.

[quote]If he’s slow, he’s slow, [R424]. There’s no crime in that if it’s true and this is a gossip site. If you don’t like it, leave.

Oh, there you are with another snappy retort R426. I doubt that little Louis is "slow", but I have no doubt that you are.

I’ve yet to slap my mother across the face (talk less of in public) nor do I exhibit sensory issues like Louis.

Again, no big deal if he’s special needs. Why are you so angry about the possibility of a royal child with a delay? Is he any less deserving of love or proper discipline, R447?

Bless your heart R448.

You’d be out of your depth in a mud puddle.

How snappy of you, R448.

So the issue is that Louis is showing signs of the ‘tism?

No wonder William doesn’t want anymore kids with Kate.

I thought they'd be stuck with each other, but now I'm wondering if perhaps Meghan will start considering cutting her losses and getting a settlement before the money's completely gone. Harry might not do as well in the will as she originally thought.

Oops…meant R449

There are some sad people on here who take great joy in slagging off a four year old child for being a four year old.

That says more about you than anything.

So, 4 years old is the cut-off? And, 1 & 3 are fair game?

It’s amazing how the sensitivity is switched on/off depending on which person’s kid is the target.

Says more about you than anything.

I thought H & M would attend the concert and the pageant. One measly church service was their only public outing. Of course, they were purposely photographed in a window at the Trooping but I'm not counting that as a public event. I also believe that they wanted the Archbishop of Canterbury to christen Lili but he conveniently caught Covid so their plans were dashed.

[quote]Oops…meant [R449]

Don't you worry R452. You'll get the hang of this internet stuff eventually. No shame in being slow.

Stans spouting off on a child do the Markles no favors. They are MADT that their idols have been revealed as horribly soggy losers.

R454 - you barely sound like an adult yourself. NO child is fair game, whatever their age. Why am I surprised that I have to tell you that.

Amazing that you say that, R458, but this is your first comment to such an effect in this thread. That is full of questionable comments related to children.

Funny.

No one slagged off Louis and you know it; untwist your panties. He exhibited shitty behavior: his age doesn’t excuse him from that. He’s school age and if he were to behave that way to another child during school, it would be a problem. Unless you feel it should be ignored because of his background?

On top of it, he doesn’t seem to respect his mother’s authority and is poorly disciplined. That’s (again) not slagging off: it’s taking notice of live behavior and speaking up about it. Are you one of those people that says “They’re too young to do X” only for them to go from holy terror of a child to monster of an adult?

This is a gossip site with pointless bitchery as a tagline where ‘Patsy Ramsey, Formerly of Boulder, CO’ routinely is used to sign posts. Grow thicker skin or leave.

R459 = Roxane Gay and she is getting tired of reminding everyone that this is a gossip site with pointless bitchery. She’s exhausted.

Either they're trying to take all the attention or they're snubbing. Which is it? They're not wanted at any of the events. Why aren't they at any of the events? Which is it? Hate who you want, but pick a lane. The British press is fucked. They've set up a game, that can't possibly be won.

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

The kid has a title, just not HRH.

This automatically changes should her grandfather ascend to the throne.

I found that whole spiel from Meghan more than a little disingenuous, especially since I’m sure it was explained to her about Charlotte and Louis only having titles at birth because the Patents were changed. And, they were changed because their father is the heir’s heir. I mean…come on, girl.

The skin color comments…yeah, who wouldn’t be curious but if it was curiosity with malicious undertones (which the Sussexes claim is the case), I get their umbrage.

If anything they were probably joking around that she would cancel out the ginger gene. We have a few red heads in my family, and when they had kids, we would always joke about the potential kids having red hair or not.

R464, of course. But these two will take any opportunity to pull out their favorite card.

There's footage of William acting up on the balcony when he was 4.

I think there's footage of EVERY recent royal being a kid while on the balcony if you look for it.

Actually, it was the other kid, and it was a total lie. And they both were born with titles, just not HRHs. Meghan knew they would get HRHs the minute the Queen died, but conveniently ignored that and insinuated that they didn't get them at birth because of how dark they might be.

It was a blatant lie and intentionally defamatory.

Harry knew perfectly well that his 7th and 8th in line kids would have to wait for their HRHs. The Cambridge kids got theirs because they were the direct line of succession.

And Harry sat there and let his wife smear his family in the ugliest way with what he knew was a malignant falsehood.

"Four year old Louis has no excuse for his behavior and should be held accountable!"

Also:

"How dare you criticize the behavior of a 41 yr old woman?!"

Some of these people are insane.

R449 wrote: "Bless your heart.

You’d be out of your depth in a mud puddle. Stealing this! 🤣

R448- He is just a paid troll from Marlkes vicious troll farm. They work from India, I believe. Some shit hole country. The living conditions probably make them bitter.

R466, Louis's behavior might very well be "being a Windsor kid," but it is not "being a kid" in general.

There is simply no reason to assert that it is normal 4-year-old behavior to (and I'm not going to list yet again; there's complete video linked in this thread) treat one's mother as Louis did. Or girl relative. Or a public event where one can look at one's well-behaved siblings to mimic.

Plus, the disrespect wasn't only action; it comprised also Louis's negative reaction to his mother's (extremely mild) attempts at discipline (actually, coddling rather than discipline).

Oh, but then he ended his gig with a big hug, resting his head on Mum.

Is this what he's observed: disrespect; a nasty shutting up; all "made better" with a hug?

Sorry, wrong thread.

Glad to see you post your delusions expected of four year olds, r471. Keep it up, so we can laugh at you more!

Meghan and Harry got the last laugh by releasing a photo of Diana's only blue-eyed grandchild.

Lol r471, Louis' behaviour was exactly normal for a four-year-old kid. And, considering that he was on the world stage, surrounded by tens of thousands of people, with all that loud noise around him, he managed to wave and sing and stand still at all the right moments, was up or outside the home at unusual times, he actually did very well.

Pity the mothers you know, r475.

Well if she had to sit behind that horse next to Prince Charles, I could see how that's humiliating.

Tell us about the mothers with four-year-old kids whom you know, r476.

Louis the Tard isn't just the average 4-year-old though. He's had a sense of gravitas instilled in him since he could talk, or should have had, but clearly isn't bright enough to understand.

Eugenie's one-year-old could have been excused for throwing a tantrum, but was impeccably behaved. How is autistic Louis going to cope with school? Better get him a private tutor.

Beatrice’s stepson was also there without incident.

You must have missed Bayatress wrestling with him.

R440, you don't get it. Mrs. & Mrs. Markle don't give a damn about issues or other people.

They treat people like shit, use people and events for their gain (or at least try, they ultimately fail at everything), and are blatantly and in neon lights hypocritical.

Michelle Obama no longer chitchats with sMEGs, that is a social humiliation!

Michelle's people went to People to set the record straight that she barely knows her.

Anyone with children has had those moments of dealing with a tempestuous child. It is a part of life. I think it all made people like and respect Kate even more.

Indeed r486. The eldergays on DL who haven't been near a small child in decades and certainly haven't parented one are completely unaware that to the vast majority of the population, Louis' extremely typical behaviour for a tired, over-stimulated and fractious four year old actually makes Kate and William seem like average, normal people dealing with the average, normal life experiences that most people go through.

The Meghan Loons are out tonight, I see!

Louis the Tard

Middle-aged Charlotte

Gay, surly George

They still outrank you and always will, Smeggy. ^^

The Megaloons always cry racism but don't mind insulting children and making death threats. Hypocrites forever.

^*its Meghan's lunatic "fans" who routinely issue death threats. Just ask Brotish journalists. You can start with Camila Tominey.

Meghan's trolls have been threatening DL and LSA posters for years.

You wouldn't be the troll who once said on DL that Orinxess Charlotte would be a whore by ths time she was 15. With her legs open to all comers?

Twitter post from a Meghan Maniac this weekend: "Prince Louis is autistic. Speeadvthe word."

You people are clinical cases. You need help badly.

R491 Apologies, I misread your post.

Just reverse the pronouns from you to they.

R492

Yeah, I was a little surprised, as you were agreeing with me 🙂

R487- Old saying in the South- Kids don't come out of the oven already done. If they did they would not need parents to raise them.

R471 - Wrong planet, too.

R325, MM spent that flight home furiously gaslighting Harry! HM, Charles, and William must be the villains, not either or both of themselves with their behaviors, interviews, statements, accusations, and general narcissism and paranoia.

The Sussexes are draws now as exotic zoo animals are---curiosities but essentially inconsequential. "Guess who I saw at Barnes and Noble?!"

Meghan can Blog, Harry can Podcast, but so what? She did that pre-Harry, and he has nothing of import to say.

I don't understand her at all. She wanted to bag a Royal Prince of the Realm, and then proceeded to essentially de-Royal and de-Realm him! It would've killed them to stay home, be loyal, and visit hospitals and schools?

Well, maybe the entire situation just comes down to the Time Immemorial inherent conflict between two brothers, and the no less commonplace coolness between sisters-in-law. Add in parental issues and a required curtsy or three, and Katy, bar the door!

You mean, aside from those of my 20 cousins and my own, back in the day?

Do you think 4-year-olds are a 21st Century invention?

R498 was to r478.

sMEGs always self-humiliates and those who adore her are not different. I feel bad for Li-LOO-Bot to have sMEGs as a mom.

Netflix needs to smarten up and do an exposé documentary on the Sussexes. They would get a bigger audience.

^^^I'm thinking of cancelling my Netflix membership until they dump them.

'sMEGs always self-humiliates and those who adore her are not different. I feel bad for Li-LOO-Bot to have sMEGs as a mom'

What kind of mangled crap is this? Are you suffering from early onset dementia?

[quote]sMEGs always self-humiliates and those who adore her are not different.

True dat. The biggest self-own, IMO, were the Michelle Obama lies and the subsequent disclaimer from the Obama camp. That shit was on par with Melania plagiarising Michelle's speech.

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

^ Sorry for the double post.

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

^ Holy shit, what the hell is wrong with DL today?

Poster is dim.

^ Yeah, & I expect to be royally reamed while wearing the crown of state by Johnny, the Queen's guard in his kilt. Live in Windsor Castle, have y own jet, & be 20 years younger, 4 inches taller, with a butt & 6 pack to die for..

What I & harry need to realize: The whole rhyme is "if wishes were fishes, and cattle were kings, the world would be full of wonderful things."

Harry put down the pipe. sober up & see life as you have created it. You're a grown-a*s man, FFS!

Weird, he wasn't demanding an apology when he was taking those millions from daddy and the taxpayers, nor when he was giving Oprah interviews calling his family racists and abusers... Funny that.

These morons live in a universe of their own. A vile, contorted, narcissistic universe where everything is upside down and the Mad Hatter is king.

KLAN WHORES

Judging by the massive size of William's cock at 4:30 during the Wales visit, this is the real reason Haz is so angry and jealous

^^^from that video I take it the Louis is still in the oubliette.

He does look big.

They never brought the children with them last week

William's nickname at Eton was allegedly "Big Willy"

Who exactly is that weird, random tweeter, r520?

Does anyone know how pap photos work with regards to children? Meaning if Harry brought his kids would others be allowed to photograph them getting off the plane etc or no because he doesnt want them photographed?? Some companies will take photos but blur out kids faces.

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

A Harry meme.

Soon after this was put out, Harry had his photographer post random photos of Harry with wounded vets at IG.

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Typical sussex PR. They squeeze every last drop from one event for as long as they can. Just last year, we were still reading stories on wedding guests and how they agonized on what hat to wear to the sussex wedding. Tomorrow it will be about the fucking face painting.

^Where are that child's legs?!

R523, celebs in the UK usually have agreements with pap companies regarding their children - for example, Kate Moss's daughter's face was always blurred while Jordan's kiddies were fair game. Idk what's the deal with "foreign" celebs like H&M though. I believe all royals are in a different category where only preapproved photos are permitted.

Heaven forbid they would buy something that would appeal to a 1 year old rather than Meghan's taste.