Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Duchess Meghan Markle visits Uvalde memorial for the school shooting victims

This woman is a saint, she shows up when no one else would, with her Netflix camera crew in tow to help bring awareness to this massacre. God Bless our beautiful Meghan. She is a pillar of strength, class and humility.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 600May 30, 2022 1:27 PM

I have such an urge to kick her in that flat narcissistic ass and hope her toothpick ankles snap in the process!

by Anonymousreply 1May 26, 2022 11:28 PM

That’s very kind. This was a horrible tragedy.

by Anonymousreply 2May 26, 2022 11:29 PM

She looks so thin!

by Anonymousreply 3May 26, 2022 11:29 PM

This is really bad. She’s over. I’ve made excuses for her in the past, thinking she was just a superficial, attention-seeking, childish woman seeking affirmation. But not necessarily a horrible person. I was wrong.

And her dad is hospitalized. But she’s showing up to exploit the deaths of kids.

by Anonymousreply 4May 26, 2022 11:30 PM

Yeah, the Modern-Day Saint of Montecito blesses site of tragedy with her healing presence. Hiw kind indeed!!

by Anonymousreply 5May 26, 2022 11:31 PM

Meanwhile, Kate was nowhere to be found.

by Anonymousreply 6May 26, 2022 11:34 PM

Never one to miss a good photo op with wall-wall media presence in Uvalde

by Anonymousreply 7May 26, 2022 11:34 PM

What a strange young woman. It’s almost like parody.

by Anonymousreply 8May 26, 2022 11:34 PM

Did Matthew Mcconaughey show up yet? He is actually from Uvalde, and the only celebrity who would get a pass, and not look like a fame whore if they showed up. I wonder if in her mind, because she was the first idiot from Hollywood to be there she won the "I care the most" prize.

by Anonymousreply 9May 26, 2022 11:39 PM

R6 Did you expect Kate to just jet on over? Working royal's visits are not impromptu affairs!

by Anonymousreply 10May 26, 2022 11:39 PM

It's sweet that she went to pay her respects.

by Anonymousreply 11May 26, 2022 11:39 PM

Did she leave bananas with inspiring sayings?

by Anonymousreply 12May 26, 2022 11:40 PM

Why would Kate jet over, r10? She's already busy avoiding palace work at home! She must be exhausted, the poor dear.

by Anonymousreply 13May 26, 2022 11:40 PM

[quote] "She looks so thin!"

Amateur!

by Anonymousreply 14May 26, 2022 11:41 PM

Prediction: when she realizes this was a disaster, some ridiculous story that she was in the area for something else will be floated. And the ridiculous story will be flattering to her. Like she was accepting an award for being a great humanitarian, but it’s a secret because she’s helping people who are in the witness protection program.

by Anonymousreply 15May 26, 2022 11:42 PM

She is obscene: utterly shameless and completely disrespectful.

She will be canceled for this. Big. Time.

by Anonymousreply 16May 26, 2022 11:43 PM

I did not think someone more tone deaf in this world existed than Helen Keller.

by Anonymousreply 17May 26, 2022 11:43 PM

She is wearing sneaker, jeans and a baseball cap. And walking with her bodyguard. Why, she is just like us! The people's Duchess!!

by Anonymousreply 18May 26, 2022 11:44 PM

R14 Both amateurs

by Anonymousreply 19May 26, 2022 11:45 PM

I get that she is shameless and abnormal. Taken as a given.

But why this outfit? Are we supposed to believe she was at the grocery store, heard about the shooting and immediately rushed, as she was, to give “aid”? She clearly planned this to the smallest, shallowest detail, and it does not make sense. The mind reels.

by Anonymousreply 20May 26, 2022 11:47 PM

Sunshine Sach's version of damage control. Your estrange father has a major stroke so you lay flowers at the memoria for shooting victims. Why, that will fool everyone!

by Anonymousreply 21May 26, 2022 11:48 PM

Barack Obama posted today that while we are thinking about the dead children in Uvalde, we should all also remember that this is the second anniversary of the George Floyd killing.

by Anonymousreply 22May 26, 2022 11:48 PM

Bitch, please. Nobody invited her grifting ass. She is there only because there are a thousand cameras and she needs attention and praise.

by Anonymousreply 23May 26, 2022 11:48 PM

She's a hoor.

by Anonymousreply 24May 26, 2022 11:50 PM

How utterly charming and chic! Laying flowers at a memorial l dressed like she is on the way home from the gym after a workout. Why don't we do such occassions, Willam?

by Anonymousreply 25May 26, 2022 11:51 PM

You're not Mexican, you know..

by Anonymousreply 26May 26, 2022 11:51 PM

She left the Royal family so she would do "meaningful" and world changing philanthropy. Yet, here she is laying flowers at a memorial. What is wrong with this picture?

by Anonymousreply 27May 26, 2022 11:54 PM

Kate was on her chaise lounge eating bon bons, while enjoying the footage of the all the carnage.

by Anonymousreply 28May 26, 2022 11:54 PM

Whoever wrote that Times article is terrible. They open talking about how the Duchess visited, which is also the headline, and then immediately segue into the actual story, talking about some father grieving. Like there was no point in even mentioning it in the same article. There was no detail, no facts, just the information that she visited, and then the remaining 4/5 of the article is intended to be a tear-jerker talking about the father's sadness, and never mentions Meghan again.

by Anonymousreply 29May 26, 2022 11:56 PM

Are we sure that is her? Where are hips? She seems too thin.

by Anonymousreply 30May 26, 2022 11:57 PM

So fucking pathetic of her bringing her camera crew. Read the room, bitch.

by Anonymousreply 31May 26, 2022 11:57 PM

Really crass. How would anyone think this is acceptable?

by Anonymousreply 32May 26, 2022 11:58 PM

Kate was flicking her clit, watching the footage of the shooting.

by Anonymousreply 33May 26, 2022 11:58 PM

Is this latest despicable act by Meghan vile enough that our resident psycho Meghan defenders won’t even try to deflect from it?

by Anonymousreply 34May 26, 2022 11:58 PM

The worst picture is the one where she's hovering over her camera crew of 6, which have surrounded a child's grave like vultures, instructing them what to do.

by Anonymousreply 35May 26, 2022 11:58 PM

The people’s princess…

by Anonymousreply 36May 26, 2022 11:59 PM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 37May 27, 2022 12:01 AM

A bright new penny at Susnhine Sachs said, "I know how to transform Meghan into the 'American' version of Diana, the USA's People's Princess. Send her to lay a wreath at the shooting victim's site wearing jeans and a good old American baseball hat. And next Tuesday she'll search for landmine's in K-Marts parking lot!"

by Anonymousreply 38May 27, 2022 12:01 AM

Callous. Vulgar. Grifter.

by Anonymousreply 39May 27, 2022 12:02 AM

R34 no one thinks it's despicable except for you Meghan-hating lunatics who obsess over her and her every move. Just admit you secretly want to have sex with her, and move on.

by Anonymousreply 40May 27, 2022 12:02 AM

Megham cares.

by Anonymousreply 41May 27, 2022 12:03 AM

R40 LMFAO!!

by Anonymousreply 42May 27, 2022 12:03 AM

R40 I think it’s bald Will and anorexic Kate who they want to get pegged by..

by Anonymousreply 43May 27, 2022 12:04 AM

Has Lady C commented yet?

by Anonymousreply 44May 27, 2022 12:04 AM

It is hilarious that she's ALWAYS perfectly expensively dressed, coiffed and groomed...but now she shows up in a Walmart outfit trying to convey that she's just "one of the people". What a jerk.

by Anonymousreply 45May 27, 2022 12:04 AM

No, r44. She died last month during a routine cuntectomy.

by Anonymousreply 46May 27, 2022 12:05 AM

R45 You are a salted cracker that was ready to attack Megham for wearing a designer dress to this memorial huh??

by Anonymousreply 47May 27, 2022 12:06 AM

Her ankles are abnormally tiny. They look bizarre.

by Anonymousreply 48May 27, 2022 12:07 AM

Meghan is the Peoples' Princess.

by Anonymousreply 49May 27, 2022 12:07 AM

Thin ankles? That bitch.

by Anonymousreply 50May 27, 2022 12:08 AM

For such private people who want know pres intrusion into their lives, I think it is absolutely shameful that such a private and selfless gesture was filmed! I can't imagine that it was staged

by Anonymousreply 51May 27, 2022 12:08 AM

Meghan: I’m going to Texas so I should dress like a redneck. Damn, if I was still speaking to Samantha, I could borrow some of her clothes.

by Anonymousreply 52May 27, 2022 12:09 AM

Sigh. The Sunshine Sachs intern is at full throttle tonight.

by Anonymousreply 53May 27, 2022 12:09 AM

Kate Middleton is the British equivalent of Eva Braun and Melania Trump.

by Anonymousreply 54May 27, 2022 12:10 AM

R54 you're blabbering now, SS dear. Leave Kate alone. It won't help your employer. She dug herself in big time. Go home

by Anonymousreply 55May 27, 2022 12:13 AM

This seems so forced. She could've gone incognito but no.

by Anonymousreply 56May 27, 2022 12:14 AM

R54 Maybe if they starved themselves for a few weeks.

by Anonymousreply 57May 27, 2022 12:14 AM

Her fat ass squeezed into jeggings, displaying her sagging camel toe for all to see.

Fuck this vulgar cunt and anyone defending her vile actions. Kids are dead you fucking psychos.

by Anonymousreply 58May 27, 2022 12:15 AM

Did anyone bother to ask the poor thing how she is doing?

by Anonymousreply 59May 27, 2022 12:15 AM

I don't care. Do you?

by Anonymousreply 60May 27, 2022 12:15 AM

Wonder how she got there?

by Anonymousreply 61May 27, 2022 12:16 AM

This doesn’t play the way she thinks it does. Yikes.

by Anonymousreply 62May 27, 2022 12:17 AM

R40 Kate stuck it out in the Royal family and does a hell of a lot more charitable work than Meghan does. She also doesn't put herself front and center by making cartoons, appearances on Ellen and tell alls with the press. If you understood the way the BRF worked you would get that. And if that crack about me and those of my ilk "wanting to sleep with Meghan" is your idea of "pointless bitchery" you are on the wrong site for many reasons.

by Anonymousreply 63May 27, 2022 12:17 AM

All the woke brigade are praising her to high heaven for this on twitter, even though its a blatant act of exploitation in order to get good press. She makes me sick.

by Anonymousreply 64May 27, 2022 12:18 AM

R60 that's Meghan who resembles Trump, honey, you're confused again. Narcissistic personality disorder, remember?

by Anonymousreply 65May 27, 2022 12:18 AM

Why are the SS psychos bringing up Kate? That isn't doing Meg any favors when you compare the two.

by Anonymousreply 66May 27, 2022 12:19 AM

R37 LOL do they not realize nobody is even interested in them?

by Anonymousreply 67May 27, 2022 12:20 AM

Omg her toothpick legs.

by Anonymousreply 68May 27, 2022 12:20 AM

Has this made CNN yet?

by Anonymousreply 69May 27, 2022 12:23 AM

This is the valiant effort of the Klan Granny Trolls to try to counteract the fucking MOUNTAIN of scathing criticism that the world has unleashed on that fucking insensirive famewhore using dead children to get herself some PR.

She was photographed conferring with her photo crew before the "private" shot.

You psycho Meghanstans shouldcatop trying.

No one, NO ONE, sane could miss the cruel cold calculation of this bitch COMING IN with her own film crew two days after 19 kids were slaughtered. Their faces were blown off by that AR rifle and their parents are still providing hair and DNA samples to ID their kids' mangled bodies.

But now the story is, OH SHOCK UPON SHOCK! About Meghan Showing Up.

And you shites put up a thread about her fucking photo op for fucking Netflix which wants its pound of flesh for its reality show, and that pound is the dead flesh of murdered children

You fucking Meghan idolaters belong in a zoo.

by Anonymousreply 70May 27, 2022 12:24 AM

[quote] All the woke brigade are praising her to high heaven for this on twitter, even though its a blatant act of exploitation in order to get good press. She makes me sick.

Says you.

The way I see it, the Klan Grannies are having a fit because this makes her look good.

There are two sides to every coin, cunt.

You're just on the WRONG side.

by Anonymousreply 71May 27, 2022 12:25 AM

[quote] Did Matthew Mcconaughey show up yet? He is actually from Uvalde, and the only celebrity who would get a pass, and not look like a fame whore if they showed up

He issued a statement urging gun control Now

by Anonymousreply 72May 27, 2022 12:25 AM

[quote] with her Netflix camera crew in tow to help bring awareness to this massacre

Nowhere in the article does it state a Netflix camera crew was there

by Anonymousreply 73May 27, 2022 12:26 AM

I second that, r70.

You megbots are fucking sick. Have some respect for this tragedy, assholes.

by Anonymousreply 74May 27, 2022 12:28 AM

Vile cunt

by Anonymousreply 75May 27, 2022 12:28 AM

She's a monster.

by Anonymousreply 76May 27, 2022 12:29 AM

You can fly into Uvalde Airport with a a gulfstream no problem. A lot of good ol' boy ranchers keep their jets there. If this flight record is hers, and it does happen to be the only one today from the airport coming from California she spent more time in the air, than on the ground. She is likely at home now trying to get a good spin on this after reading the backlash that is coming out on social media.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 77May 27, 2022 12:30 AM

r71 How on earth does it make her look good?? Just the phrase look good reveals that this performative surface morality and not sincere. There is no need for her so called virtuous act to be anything other than private.

by Anonymousreply 78May 27, 2022 12:30 AM

You can see the Netflix cameras in some photos r73.

A cameraman who was there said MM and her crew first tried to go to the school. They don’t have press credentials and allegedly were told by a Texas Ranger that “this is the site of a massacre. It’s not a fucking celebrity photo op.”

by Anonymousreply 79May 27, 2022 12:30 AM

Guys, this is pretty crazy. Any celebrity doing this- this soon, this publicity hungry, this unconnected to Texas, the community, etc. - is an extremely bad PR move.

Why does she have the worst PR instincts?

by Anonymousreply 80May 27, 2022 12:31 AM

R73 They were photographed arranging the shot with her.

by Anonymousreply 81May 27, 2022 12:31 AM

What r73 said.

Where, r70, is it shown or stated :

[quote] She was photographed conferring with her photo crew before the "private" shot.

If you've got the goods, post it.

by Anonymousreply 82May 27, 2022 12:32 AM

For R9.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 83May 27, 2022 12:32 AM

r76 As are it increasingly seems her enablers like sunshine Sachs and Netflix.

It is terrible that Meghan and Harry obviously tried to screw over and rinse Netflix and spotify , grabbing big cheques but thinking they could do f all work for it BUT as far as I am concerned they deserved to get their fingers burnt.

by Anonymousreply 84May 27, 2022 12:33 AM

Meanwhile, I still can't speak or even swallow on my own. Could you at least call me, Honey? Please.

by Anonymousreply 85May 27, 2022 12:33 AM

I see Kate's p.r. people and the "Men in Gray" are all over this thread.

Any opportunity to bash Meghan, the racist Klan Grannies are there!

by Anonymousreply 86May 27, 2022 12:33 AM

please provide a link that she was tailed by a Netflix camera crew

thanks

by Anonymousreply 87May 27, 2022 12:34 AM

R86 They really should be tying Kate down and force feeding her tacos. Women with eating disorders usually die before they turn 50.

by Anonymousreply 88May 27, 2022 12:35 AM

The photos are easily found on twitter. Go look for them yourselves, you fucking ghouls.

by Anonymousreply 89May 27, 2022 12:35 AM

I call bullshit on the Netflix and the r79 story, until I see credible evidence that supports it.

by Anonymousreply 90May 27, 2022 12:36 AM

[quote] The photos are easily found on twitter. Go look for them yourselves,

If they are easily found, then YOU should provide it - because it is YOU making allegation

by Anonymousreply 91May 27, 2022 12:36 AM

McConaughey has every right to say something R83. That is his home town. Even he didnt dare stroll in for a photo shoot!

by Anonymousreply 92May 27, 2022 12:36 AM

There does seem to be a tv crew with her in some photos but they could just be news outlets filming the memorial

by Anonymousreply 93May 27, 2022 12:37 AM

Right r89, because we all know what a bastion of facts and credibility Twitter is.

What r91 says.

by Anonymousreply 94May 27, 2022 12:38 AM

[quote] McConaughey has every right to say something R83. That is his home town. Even he didnt dare stroll in for a photo shoot!

Oh, well.

His loss.

by Anonymousreply 95May 27, 2022 12:38 AM

McConaughey isn’t a cunt @R92 His statement was thoughtful and timely.

by Anonymousreply 96May 27, 2022 12:39 AM

You're joking, right? She knew all the media in the world are in Uvalde.

by Anonymousreply 97May 27, 2022 12:39 AM

The people defending this as anything other than a stunt are either really stupid or just trolls.

by Anonymousreply 98May 27, 2022 12:40 AM

We ALL, as Americans, have a right to be anywhere, whether it's your home town or not, that isn't prohibited by law or official investigation.

Whether you should be there is another question.

by Anonymousreply 99May 27, 2022 12:40 AM

[quote] McConaughey isn’t a cunt

But ya' are, Blanche. Ya' ARE a cunt!!!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 100May 27, 2022 12:41 AM

I call bullshit on your sycophantic love of MM, r90. I noted it was “alleged”. You may want to look up what that means.

As for photos of the Netflix crew, they are, or earlier, were, on Twitter. No I won’t seek them out because I don’t care whether you believe it or not.

It’s psychotic to travel to a massacre with a camera crew.

by Anonymousreply 101May 27, 2022 12:42 AM

[quote] You're joking, right? She knew all the media in the world are in Uvalde.

so now we have gone from saying

she had her personal TV camera crew with her

to

she knew all the cameras would be there

can you Meghan haters come up with one narrative and stick with it?

by Anonymousreply 102May 27, 2022 12:42 AM

R71, you sad, semi-sensate fuck.

You wouldn't know the right side if it showed up to promote itself at the site of a national tragedy.

That self-absorbed thing flew 1,200 miles, to an active crime scene, to make a show of herself before anybody who should have been there... before the President of the United States.

Send her some flowers, she buried her reputation today. You're just too stupid, too marginalized, to know it. At least you'll have being discredited nothings in common now.

by Anonymousreply 103May 27, 2022 12:43 AM

All can be truth you ignorant megbot.

by Anonymousreply 104May 27, 2022 12:43 AM

I’m a fat cunt but not a vile one, Jane @R100

by Anonymousreply 105May 27, 2022 12:44 AM

r99 Thats good because nobody here has said she legally had no right to be there but did exercise their right to say they feel it is tasteless vulgar and inapproriate that she was.

by Anonymousreply 106May 27, 2022 12:45 AM

The money spent for and the pollution generated by that flight just so she could make a jackass of herself.

by Anonymousreply 107May 27, 2022 12:45 AM

This dumb fucking bitch just cant help putting the wrong foot forward every single time ! No matter what she or Harry do,it just ends up making them look so bad. One could almost believe theres a goddamn curse on them . How can someone fuck up every single time ?

From another thread.

by Anonymousreply 108May 27, 2022 12:45 AM

How fortunate Harry wasn't there. After all, cameras and media attention do bring up his PTSD.

by Anonymousreply 109May 27, 2022 12:46 AM

Could she not generate tears? I'm sure it would have been more effective.

by Anonymousreply 110May 27, 2022 12:47 AM

Honey, I am worried about the Queen. She hasn't been well and now she is liable to die of embarrassment.

by Anonymousreply 111May 27, 2022 12:49 AM

Wasn’t she an actress? @R110

by Anonymousreply 112May 27, 2022 12:49 AM

If you believe anything short of Markle was spotted on The Grassy Knoll, or, she invented anthrax, or she wipes back to front than you're a Markle sycophant.

Meanwhile, her obsessive, unhinged stalkers give her exactly what they themselves say she wants- their attention.

Dwell on that loony-bins. You are providing your object of hate what you claim you hate her for - that she's an attention whore.

"The opposite of love isn't hate. The opposite of love is indifference." Diane Chambers, Cheers sitcom.

by Anonymousreply 113May 27, 2022 12:50 AM

Any tragedy and she will insert herself.

by Anonymousreply 114May 27, 2022 12:51 AM

Depends on your definition of actress.

by Anonymousreply 115May 27, 2022 12:51 AM

If only I could be Camilla's best girlfriend as she and I read the press account of Meghan's humanitarian gesture over some gin and tonics and Dunhills.

by Anonymousreply 116May 27, 2022 12:51 AM

This is the queen’s fault for allowing them to pretend to be royals @R111 She should be tougher on Andrew,, Harry and meg. The queen gets praised for her leadership techniques but she seems to let things fester and not take any action

by Anonymousreply 117May 27, 2022 12:51 AM

Meghan appears to be conferring with her photographer in this photo.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 118May 27, 2022 12:52 AM

R113. We’re just amused by how horrible she is. She has no real power. We don’t need to nip her activities in the bud. People are just obliging her by noticing her. Just not on the way she ways.

by Anonymousreply 119May 27, 2022 12:52 AM

puke...

by Anonymousreply 120May 27, 2022 12:52 AM

Do we have the clothes on Smeg's Mirror yet?

by Anonymousreply 121May 27, 2022 12:52 AM

Love her

by Anonymousreply 122May 27, 2022 12:54 AM

Interesting what DLers are saying about Meghan Markle

is the EXACT SAME THING Prince Charles supporters said about Diana

an opportunist exploiting a situation

If you took out Meghan name and inserted Diana name in all of these comments, the narrative wouldn't change

by Anonymousreply 123May 27, 2022 12:54 AM

It's clickbait, R29.

by Anonymousreply 124May 27, 2022 12:54 AM

If she had done it without the Netflix cameras, it might have been a nice touch.

by Anonymousreply 125May 27, 2022 12:55 AM

R113. The last thing a narcississt like Meghan wants is negative attention. That is why she does these humanitarian photo ops. If she wasn't interested in attentin she would send a large anonymous donation the victim's families from Montecito. And what about "Pointles Bitchery" do you not understand?

by Anonymousreply 126May 27, 2022 12:55 AM

Sparkles is the Dead People's Princess.

by Anonymousreply 127May 27, 2022 12:55 AM

"Hello, this is Her Imperial Highness's Private Secretary. I wish to inform you papparazi scum that The Presence will be laying a $9.99 bunch of petals at the sight of that shootup this afternoon at 2pm SHARP. You cunts better be there, or you're not getting any more exclusives – I mean, anonymous tips. Capeesh?"

by Anonymousreply 128May 27, 2022 12:55 AM

Wilhelm Stekel said that, not a fictional character in a tv sitcom r113.

If you don’t see why appearing a scant 48 hours after a massacre, camera in tow, to insert yourself in a tragedy, is abnormal, there’s no hope for you.

by Anonymousreply 129May 27, 2022 12:56 AM

Diana was an stent in whore too. What’s your point?

by Anonymousreply 130May 27, 2022 12:56 AM

It's quite telling there's been nothing on CNN. I bet media there was disgusted. Half of them choke up during their reporting. Imagine her flying in to need a moment. What an unsalvageable mess.

by Anonymousreply 131May 27, 2022 12:57 AM

Nothing new. Diane Chambers admirer Della has always stoutly defended Markle, starting in the Dangling Tendrils threads

by Anonymousreply 132May 27, 2022 12:58 AM

UVALDE, Texas — Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex, on Thursday visited Uvalde, Texas, where she donated food at a community center hosting a blood drive and laid flowers at a memorial for the victims of the elementary school shooting that killed 21 people, including 19 children.

BuzzFeed News spoke with volunteers at the Herby Ham Activity Center who accepted the duchess's donations. Photographers captured images of Meghan at the memorial site.

According to blood drive volunteers, Meghan, wearing a baseball cap and a black mask, quietly dropped by the community center's kitchen to drop off two "large" bags filled with sandwiches, beverages, and desserts for blood donors.

"I had no idea who she was. She just was carrying on a conversation like her and I knew each other for years," volunteer Gloria Contreras, 40, told BuzzFeed News. "We were just talking about, you know, the situation and what happened what we were doing here. I told her about us giving out water to the people and feeding them."

"I even talked about my personal life, telling her about my son and my family and, you know, coming to Texas because she told me she was from Santa Barbara and I said, 'Well, you need to come to Texas!'" Contreras said. "We were talking about Texas and Uvalde and how it is to be in a small town and how everybody is so kind and warm-hearted and know we know each other and stuff and how the faith is deep-rooted."

A Sussex representative confirmed to BuzzFeed News that the duchess traveled to Uvalde "in a personal capacity as a mother" in order to offer "her condolences and support in person to a community experiencing unimaginable grief."

"She was just really sweet," another volunteer, Georjean Burnell, 46, told BuzzFeed News. "She just kind of walked in with her crew and started putting ice waters in the bucket with us and laying out chips for the people who were needing snacks before and after donating."

"It's funny, we didn't even know it was her until after she left and now we're so sad. I mean, to be honest, we thought she was our neighbor."

by Anonymousreply 133May 27, 2022 12:59 AM

I honestly don’t care if you’re a fan of hers, but showing up with a camera crew is really gross.

by Anonymousreply 134May 27, 2022 12:59 AM

Twitter: She was there to donate blood.

Meanwhile, daddy had a stroke.

by Anonymousreply 135May 27, 2022 12:59 AM

This woman is a vile cockroach.

by Anonymousreply 136May 27, 2022 12:59 AM

R94, that’s the picture at R118. She’s surrounded by cameramen, and she’s clearly conferring with them right in front of the impromptu memorial.

by Anonymousreply 137May 27, 2022 1:01 AM

[quote] I honestly don’t care if you’re a fan of hers, but showing up with a camera crew is really gross.

There is ZERO evidence a camera crew was following her

by Anonymousreply 138May 27, 2022 1:01 AM

[quote] Wilhelm Stekel said that, not a fictional character in a tv sitcom [R113].

Both can be correct, r129. The writers of "Cheers" gave Diane Chambers that line.

I guess they could have had Shelly Long break character, look into the camera and say, "Oh, by the way, that's a quote from William Stekel", but, they didn't.

by Anonymousreply 139May 27, 2022 1:01 AM

OP your introduction was just beautiful. sob

by Anonymousreply 140May 27, 2022 1:02 AM

[quote]"It's funny, we didn't even know it was her until after she left and now we're so sad. I mean, to be honest, we thought she was our neighbor."

Then why did they take a picture, each next to the other, with someone they didn't know who they thought she was our neighbor. Is that what you do in these circumstances?

by Anonymousreply 141May 27, 2022 1:02 AM

I dont know if this photo will satisfy those who are doubting she collobrated with cameramen and photographers.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 142May 27, 2022 1:02 AM

Diana at least adapted causes like AIDS which were a risk at the time. And her landmine walk brought attention to the cause. And Diana my have badmouthed Charles as the future King, but she respected the Queen and understood what a privilege it was to have the Royal platform for worthy causes. And Diana had serious mental health issues in a difficult marriage at a time the instiutio was even more rigid. Meghan is a whiner.

by Anonymousreply 143May 27, 2022 1:02 AM

[quote] doubting she collobrated with cameramen and photographers.

But it still hasn't been confirmed those are her camera people - for all we know she was standing back to let OTHER network crews to do their job

by Anonymousreply 144May 27, 2022 1:03 AM

R138, don't miss the zero evidence at R142.

And do share your thoughts. Was she anonymously handing out sandwiches to hard working journalist?

by Anonymousreply 145May 27, 2022 1:04 AM

This is tasteless and deep down you know this. How many of you defending her would have advised her this was a good idea?

by Anonymousreply 146May 27, 2022 1:04 AM

[quote] Was she anonymously handing out sandwiches to hard working journalist?

No she was standing back to let OTHER PEOPLE do their jobs for the various networks covering the event, so she wouldn't get in THEIR shot.

by Anonymousreply 147May 27, 2022 1:05 AM

R123 Meghan is no Diana.

by Anonymousreply 148May 27, 2022 1:06 AM

Again there is ZERO evidence that is her camera crew - except for that picture that can be explained away in half a dozen ways

There is no concrete proof that was her crew

by Anonymousreply 149May 27, 2022 1:07 AM

Does a single person in the world think she did this because she thought it would benefit the people affected? All the money and pollution expended by this vanity trip could have done some actual good.

by Anonymousreply 150May 27, 2022 1:07 AM

[quote] Meghan is no Diana.

and Camilla will be Queen

by Anonymousreply 151May 27, 2022 1:07 AM

So Meghan showed up100% for altruistic reasons. She knew she wouldn't be photographed or get any publicity. BS. If she wanted to offer support to the families she could have done it privately out of the public eye. Sing again Sunshine Sachs

by Anonymousreply 152May 27, 2022 1:08 AM

Good to know, r139. The next time I say “All that glitters is not gold”, I will claim credit. After all, more people than Shakespeare have uttered this.

by Anonymousreply 153May 27, 2022 1:08 AM

Didn't Meager and Harry want privacy?

by Anonymousreply 154May 27, 2022 1:09 AM

They’re the same.

No genuine concern or respect for others.

by Anonymousreply 155May 27, 2022 1:09 AM

She's hovering over the caneraman, clearly talking to him, directing him. She's NOT standing back. That's not what standing back looks like.

by Anonymousreply 156May 27, 2022 1:09 AM

I feel sorry for the old man, bedridden and voiceless. She's definitely going bedside now. It's her last card to play in this tacky mess.

Fuck, she's stupid.

by Anonymousreply 157May 27, 2022 1:10 AM

R149 “She was just really sweet," another volunteer, Georjean Burnell, 46, told BuzzFeed News. "She just kind of walked in with her crew & started putting ice waters in the bucket with us & laying out chips for the people who were needing snacks before & after donating." Clue: “Crew.””

by Anonymousreply 158May 27, 2022 1:10 AM

R159 she had to, if she waited a few weeks that would be a couple mass shootings too late.

by Anonymousreply 159May 27, 2022 1:11 AM

Why is this topic already crossed out? WTF? We pay to post here. It appears this topic is of interest.

by Anonymousreply 160May 27, 2022 1:11 AM

[quote] She's hovering over the caneraman, clearly talking to him, directing him. She's NOT standing back. That's not what standing back looks

and you heard the conversation? you saw her lips move? you saw her using her fingers to "direct"

I certainly didn't see that in the picture

by Anonymousreply 161May 27, 2022 1:11 AM

I'd say the odds got a lot higher the Brits will forget their manners when she goes up the steps to St. Paul's next week.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 162May 27, 2022 1:14 AM

Anyone praising or supporting her for this incredibly tone deaf and self involved move is clearly blinded by celebrity lust. There are and were thousands of ways she could have made a positive impact in this horrible tragedy, behind the scenes. There is absolutely no reason - at all - for her to be there. None.

by Anonymousreply 163May 27, 2022 1:14 AM

R151 And? I think Camilla will do well as Queen. What has that have to do with “Meghan is no Diana?”

by Anonymousreply 164May 27, 2022 1:14 AM

R149 Right. They just ambled by, asked if they could help, and she amiably allowed them to set the shot up for her.

You fucking hopeless Mehjanstans really are clinically ill.

What there is zero evidence of is your grasp of reality.

Did you see any other celebrities showing up 48 hours later with HD perfect photos in the media?

by Anonymousreply 165May 27, 2022 1:14 AM

[quote] Nothing new. Diane Chambers admirer Della has always stoutly defended Markle, starting in the Dangling Tendrils threads.

The poster you mention, R132, is a Markle bot with questionable discernment. She lauded Meghan’s appearance at the Lion King: Granny Clampett meets too-tight-black-dress with holes in the dress from the strain. Unbelievably supporting the “my wife does voiceover pitches” to the bizarre interaction between Markle and Beyoncé/Jay-Z.

Tasteless.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 166May 27, 2022 1:15 AM

Didn’t she wonder why there were no other celebs using this tragedy to promote themselves? She’s the only one, but she’s probably gloating that she was FIRST.

Didn’t stop to wonder, did she?

by Anonymousreply 167May 27, 2022 1:15 AM

I hope Camilla rolls her eyes at Smeg so she can throw a tantrum and get the fuck out.

by Anonymousreply 168May 27, 2022 1:16 AM

[quote]She looks so thin!

For god’s sake, she’s a breast feeding mom! And she’s personally wet nursing all the poor children of Montecito through this national infant formula shortage!

Can you find no charity for her in your black, shriveled heart??

by Anonymousreply 169May 27, 2022 1:16 AM

r163 Blinded by celebrity lust or an unhealthy attachment to identity politics vices of excusing people because of of one of their characteristics rather than their behaviour and personal choices and character?

by Anonymousreply 170May 27, 2022 1:17 AM

Will she be at Ray Liotta's memorial service?

by Anonymousreply 171May 27, 2022 1:18 AM

[quote] they just ambled by, asked if they could help, and she amiably allowed them to set the shot up for her.

Or maybe these newshounds got wind she was around and ran up the street to get a shot of her in that area.

by Anonymousreply 172May 27, 2022 1:18 AM

R161 As the French say, "Cela ca voit". Literally, that sees itself.

And on casual visual evidence, the earth doesn't look round, either.

Give it up and go back to the gullible hysterics in the Sussex Squad or to Celebitchy.

This is one of the most tasteless, terrible PR mistakes Meghan has ever made. And, given her track record, that's saying quite alot.

by Anonymousreply 173May 27, 2022 1:19 AM

You'll never be me, bitch

by Anonymousreply 174May 27, 2022 1:19 AM

Oh, but how we wish she was, broom broom,

by Anonymousreply 175May 27, 2022 1:20 AM

R161:

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 176May 27, 2022 1:20 AM

Yeah, any time paps hear Meg is around they stop what they are doing to get her photo. Sure.

by Anonymousreply 177May 27, 2022 1:20 AM

R176 just proof that a picture can be explained away a half dozen ways.

[quote] Yeah, any time paps hear Meg is around they stop what they are doing to get her photo. Sure

If you don't believe that - then you don't know how low news gathering had sunk in 2022

by Anonymousreply 178May 27, 2022 1:22 AM

She's wrong for doing this.

by Anonymousreply 179May 27, 2022 1:23 AM

So when do we see the fancy calligraphy message written on the card? Will there be a special sidebar explaining the symbolic meaning of the flowers chosen and the color of the ribbon? Will Merching Meg casually name-check the florist?

by Anonymousreply 180May 27, 2022 1:24 AM

Impulsive bipolar bitch.

by Anonymousreply 181May 27, 2022 1:24 AM

I love that Megham makes the pathetic BRF queens SEETHE!! Keep at it Megham , she is the gift that keeps on giving!

by Anonymousreply 182May 27, 2022 1:25 AM

[quote] Or maybe these newshounds got wind she was around and ran up the street to get a shot of her in that area.

And everyone lined up and posed just-so with a random masked stranger. Totally candid, not posed. So natural!

by Anonymousreply 183May 27, 2022 1:26 AM

R178, I'm impressed how low PR spin will sink, though. Feel dirty when you log off tonight. You are.

by Anonymousreply 184May 27, 2022 1:26 AM

If she really wanted to make an impact, she could have protested at the NRA convention in Houston this week. Not fly over a thousand miles to to drop off flowers, lunch, and allegedly donate blood. We had all the blood drives for this right after it happened when it was an actual emergency, and they were asking for all RH type Os to come on down. Now they are just stockpiling again.

by Anonymousreply 185May 27, 2022 1:27 AM

And I'm not even trending!!!!!!!

by Anonymousreply 186May 27, 2022 1:27 AM

[quote] Feel dirty when you log off tonight. You are.

No I just don't jump to conclusions- try it sometime.

by Anonymousreply 187May 27, 2022 1:28 AM

You're a dirty fool.

by Anonymousreply 188May 27, 2022 1:28 AM

I'm sure the families of the dead children appreciate that, r182. Get help, you're disgusting.

by Anonymousreply 189May 27, 2022 1:29 AM

Stupid is as stupid does.

by Anonymousreply 190May 27, 2022 1:30 AM

Honestly if she did show up with a camera crew, don't you think the Daily Mail & TMZ would report that to rip her to shreds

So far NO ONE has reported that - until someone comes forward to say

"She was with a camera crew" there is ZERO proof she had one.

There is not a single news outlet reporting this, and we all know they would be shouting from the rooftops if she did.

by Anonymousreply 191May 27, 2022 1:32 AM

A Sussex representative confirmed to BuzzFeed News that the duchess traveled to Uvalde "in a personal capacity as a mother" in order to offer "her condolences and support in person to a community experiencing unimaginable grief."

Yes "as a mother." Not milking her last bits of royal celebrity. And it is her being a mother that gives her the special insight to minster to the those in need. And she couldn't have sent over flowers and sandwhiches from Montecito? And she brought her "crew since all mother's need a crew when handing out sandwhiches

Seriously? As a mother?

by Anonymousreply 192May 27, 2022 1:33 AM

R189 Stay mad pathetic dumb cunt , it’s hilarious!

by Anonymousreply 193May 27, 2022 1:33 AM

Someone on DL predicted this would happen yesterday. I thought this was a joke thread until I saw it really happened.

I hate to doubt her motives….but, ummm, I am doubting her motives.

by Anonymousreply 194May 27, 2022 1:33 AM

In what other capacity? She is a nobody.

by Anonymousreply 195May 27, 2022 1:34 AM

I have to give Meghan credit. It was a nice gesture. She's the mother of two, young children. I don't have children, but I cannot imagine having to worry about sending your ten-year-old off to school and having to worry whether the kid will be killed there. And that's what probably went through her mind.

She went with little fanfare. In a moment like this, you have to believe her motives stemmed from sympathy and empathy with the victims. Who among us would not want to do the same?

Give her some credit.

by Anonymousreply 196May 27, 2022 1:35 AM

I despise the woman but I can’t hate on her for going to pay her respects.

by Anonymousreply 197May 27, 2022 1:37 AM

That's sweet but she's a cockroach.

by Anonymousreply 198May 27, 2022 1:37 AM

I will like her in this moment...

by Anonymousreply 199May 27, 2022 1:37 AM

At lest she didn't squat.

by Anonymousreply 200May 27, 2022 1:39 AM

She brought a crew with her. Who bought the fucking sandwiches? Who drove her there? Who was she standing overt while they took a photograph of the Princess Di white roses she laid on the sidewalk? She was hovering over a random paparazzo? She was standing directly over and speaking to a freelance AP photographer?

Do you believe in the Tooth Fairy and the Easter Bunny, too?

by Anonymousreply 201May 27, 2022 1:40 AM

R167, she's not a celebrity, she is a ROYAL!!!

(The BRF really needs to strip them of their titles. They are both truly despicable and amoral.)

by Anonymousreply 202May 27, 2022 1:40 AM

Psycho squad unfuckables believe anything.

by Anonymousreply 203May 27, 2022 1:41 AM

[quote] She brought a crew with her

Then why is NO media outlet reporting that - and they would because it would be a scandal to sell paper

so why is the media silent on this?

by Anonymousreply 204May 27, 2022 1:42 AM

She's a mother, ya'll. She can do anything.

by Anonymousreply 205May 27, 2022 1:42 AM

....and she didn't say...."Does anyone ask how I'm doing?" Being snarky. It was a good gesture. I'll give her that.

by Anonymousreply 206May 27, 2022 1:42 AM

Smeg fans are the new trump supporters.

by Anonymousreply 207May 27, 2022 1:44 AM

So tacky.

by Anonymousreply 208May 27, 2022 1:45 AM

R196 and R197. The point is not that she went to pay her respects. Why did she do it in a way that she knew damn well would be splashed all over the media? And it has been establshed she had a "crew." And was handing out sandwhiches and laying a wreath in person the really most neecessary aide these people needed?

by Anonymousreply 209May 27, 2022 1:46 AM

[quote] [bold] She went with little fanfare. [/bold]

Volunteers at the local community centre confirmed she had a cameraman filming her everywhere she went. Filmed in public so didnt require releases from others who were filmed near her.

by Anonymousreply 210May 27, 2022 1:48 AM

Say she didn't bring a Netflix crew: so, instead only going to drop off the food when she saw how many press cameras were at the memorial at that time, OR going to the memorial but, when she saw cameras pointed at her, asking them to not take her picture because this is a private moment (there's no way it wouldn't have been reported if she had), she did THIS: march right in the middle of a gaggle of press, maskless, with her bodyguard and an assistant tailing her, and slowly posed to a chorus of clicks. Not PR, my ass.

by Anonymousreply 211May 27, 2022 1:50 AM

She must have been tired having been up all night preparing her offering.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 212May 27, 2022 1:55 AM

I can't even imagine the agony she was in, not being able to smile and pose for the nice cameras. Poor dear.

by Anonymousreply 213May 27, 2022 1:55 AM

I told her she needed to put that potato salad in a cooler but she didn't seem interested.

by Anonymousreply 214May 27, 2022 1:55 AM

Sorry a bunch of kids are dead. Choose to be positive!!!

by Anonymousreply 215May 27, 2022 1:56 AM

You are all a bunch of nasty old Queens. Meghan laying a wreath has singlehandly stopped all future gun violence in th USA. Nobody was even talking about the incident or the issue until Meghan and her people showed up in her capacity as "a mother" to shine her special light on the tragedy. She didn't asked to be photographed. If she wasn't, would we even know about this tragedy at all?

by Anonymousreply 216May 27, 2022 1:57 AM

R204, where’s the video footage of her laying the Princess Di flowers? Where’s the video footage of her at the blood donation center, bringing sandwiches and chatting with the ladies she was so sweet with?

Nowhere. Because Netflix owns it and they’re keeping it exclusive for their “docu-series”.

by Anonymousreply 217May 27, 2022 1:58 AM

I’ve no doubt she was devastated by this tragedy because we are all devastated by this tragedy (except for Ted Cruz and the rest of the GOP).

But it’s very odd that she’s there. It’s not like it happened near home. And the timing—days after her dad had a stroke and attention is on if she’ll visit him and days before she attends the Jubly and faces her husband’s family who hates her—is very suspect.

If it turns out she orchestrated media coverage of her trip or if it ends up in the Netflix doc, she will go from being a harmless source of endless amusement for DL to someone who is truly despicable.

by Anonymousreply 218May 27, 2022 2:00 AM

All those cameras, and all we see are the same four photos of her.

How strange.

by Anonymousreply 219May 27, 2022 2:00 AM

"Camilla , listen to this "in her capacity as a mother!!"

"'Mother' certainly describes, Megs, Kate, dear"

"Is 'mother' the American word for duchess, mum?"

by Anonymousreply 220May 27, 2022 2:01 AM

Vieja pendeja.

by Anonymousreply 221May 27, 2022 2:01 AM

On the UK headline of the DM there are around 17,500 messages of pure disgust. Meghan is being dragged by everyone - this was a huge misstep on her part. I think a huge problem Meghan has is that she doesn't seem to get that there is no monarchy in the US and the last thing the community of this small Texas town needs is her presence. This isn't the Queen visiting Aberdeen (?) after a landslide happened killing a school full of children. Even then she didn't show up the day of for fear she'd be in the way.

Bethany Frankel (who I am no fan of) is a fame whore, but she is the only star that goes on these types of humanitarian missions with a Boeing 747 stock full of supplies to disaster areas.

by Anonymousreply 222May 27, 2022 2:03 AM

It seems she may not have employed the duchess title in her conversations with the locals. How thoughtful.

by Anonymousreply 223May 27, 2022 2:03 AM

From a Reddit user who states they are a journalist currrently at the site:

bubblegum_yum_yum · 10 min. ago

[quote]I’m going to be very frank because this situation is extremely real and raw and beyond what words can describe: It’s time for HER to ask EVERYONE HERE if they’re okay! Don’t bring them chips and shitty sandwiches and show up with an entire media crew here for YOU and not for actual media coverage of what is happening! She’s also fucking it up for us actual reporters on the scene. There are such strict protocols and the relationship between the media and officials is predicated on such a fine line that having a fucking unauthorized media crew show up sets every other journalist back! We, as the media, have set boundaries where we respect certain protocols in terms of space, stories, etc. In turn, we’re allowed to document literal history and tell the stories of these children and their beloved lives that were so disgustingly taken from them and their families. Showing up with an invasive celebrity media team impedes the actual media trying to record what is happening and does so much damage to everyone here

by Anonymousreply 224May 27, 2022 2:03 AM

She must be really desperate.

by Anonymousreply 225May 27, 2022 2:07 AM

Now that the public revulsion is clear, Omid Scobie will come forward with a clarification, as always. The Duchess actually understood her father to have died and believed she was visiting a memorial to him and providing sandwiches to the funeral party. Any negative interpretation of her behaviour is spiteful and racist.

by Anonymousreply 226May 27, 2022 2:10 AM

She fucking had buzzfeed correct their story on what she brought to the blood drive. She also made sure the correction listed her as meghan ,the duchess of sussex. Instead of two bags of food, she now brought two large crates.

by Anonymousreply 227May 27, 2022 2:11 AM

Just think of the resources used for this trip and what that money could have been used for: private plane to and from Texas, fuel, security for Meghan. I'm sure she had to coordinate with the local PD to alert them of her presence and security. This is not the time or place. Even the President I'm sure will wait for the actual crime scene to settle down before visiting. I think this will be the end of her. For once Harry was smart or the stars were aligned that he was not there. I feel a power shift in his favor if he wanted to divorce her over this. Yes, I know he won't, but this would be a great time for him to grab his balls and run back to the UK. He can start a new family and Meghan can keep the kids.

by Anonymousreply 228May 27, 2022 2:12 AM

We are proud to announce that Archewell will match all charitable contributions* for the Uvalde community made through our organization.

* 2 cents on the dollar

by Anonymousreply 229May 27, 2022 2:12 AM

She probably also made a substantial financial donation but is far too demure to mention it

by Anonymousreply 230May 27, 2022 2:12 AM

You can't make this shit up. She is a joke.

by Anonymousreply 231May 27, 2022 2:12 AM

Hey, Meghan. People keep dying on and around the Q train! Why don’t you get your flat ass jetted to NYC and plant your tulips right here? Ayyoooo!

by Anonymousreply 232May 27, 2022 2:14 AM

I would have made the trip too, but it didn’t seem that it would spark joy.

by Anonymousreply 233May 27, 2022 2:15 AM

Good point R222. Bethany Frankle has an unquenchable thirst for fame, but she does leverage it to help people in disaster zones on a fairly massive scale. Big difference from a self serving drive by of an unspeakable tragedy.

Wearing the ball cap to be “incognito” instead of her usual glamorous self (see recent polo getup) is clearly an attempt to look anonymous for cameras… which is damn near impossible after either dragging along your own crew or thrusting yourself in front of media on the scene.

by Anonymousreply 234May 27, 2022 2:16 AM

R230, no, she mentioned the sandwiches.

by Anonymousreply 235May 27, 2022 2:16 AM

What is your psychotic obsession with this woman? Every single day there are multiple threads created about her and I just don't understand. If this woman is annoying enough to inspire such seething hatred... wouldn't your lives be better if you just ignored her? That's what I do. I don't think about her at all, but you people certainly obsess over her enough for the rest of the world.

It's also like how you all insist on bringing Donald Trump into every single thread, ones that have nothing to do with him devolve into Donald Trump threads. I don't get that either. I don't obsess over him either the way you all do (because I'm not American). Again, wouldn't your lives be better just ignoring him?

by Anonymousreply 236May 27, 2022 2:17 AM

No, you couldn't make it up, but Meg's antics fit in well with all the other garbage churning around in this washing machine of life.

by Anonymousreply 237May 27, 2022 2:18 AM

Maybe Meghan really IS the Peoples Princess. Knowing how divided and on a razors edge all of the US is, she jumped on a metaphorical landmine all the while knowing that she would receive nothing but hate and disgust. But, ever the humanitarian, she knew the one thing that would unite the right and left, gun lovers and not, would be the absolute revision by her actions. Mission accomplished. The world in united against Meghan in this time of grief.

by Anonymousreply 238May 27, 2022 2:18 AM

Nobody in Uvalde would have a clue who she is. If she announces herself as a Duchess, they probably figured she was related to the Duke of Earl.

by Anonymousreply 239May 27, 2022 2:18 AM

R224 yep, it’s all going to come out quickly. I was a journalist and have been at some gruesome scenes—not on this scale though. If that imbecile tried to grab the spotlight while I was trying to cover a tragedy, I and my colleagues would excoriate her.

by Anonymousreply 240May 27, 2022 2:21 AM

[quote]wouldn’t your lives be better if you just ignored her?

What fun would that be R236?

by Anonymousreply 241May 27, 2022 2:21 AM

R236. Geez. She’s just a horrible woman who is amusing to mock. Do you find a lot of deep meaning elsewhere on this board.? Madonna and Aaron Rogers aren’t cosmically significant either but they are discussed to death here as well. And Aaron Rogers doesn’t try to soient I’m the news multiple times a week.

What is the source of your particular concern for this reprehensible woman?

by Anonymousreply 242May 27, 2022 2:21 AM

Girlfriend had a mask on...until it was time to kneel at the little cross and deliver the Stop & Shop bouquet. Why do you think she took it off?

by Anonymousreply 243May 27, 2022 2:22 AM

She took the mask off for the photos, duh!

by Anonymousreply 244May 27, 2022 2:24 AM

R236 You don’t like the topic? Move on.

by Anonymousreply 245May 27, 2022 2:26 AM

R242, I have no concern for her at all, as I stated if you had bothered to read what I wrote. This board has no deep meaning anywhere, it's shallow, hollow and vacuous. Look, I just don't understand it, that's all. I was simply asking questions as to why multiple threads for a reprehensible woman you all insist on starting multiple times a day.

by Anonymousreply 246May 27, 2022 2:27 AM

Nice try at a pivot, R236, but fail.

Now, with all due respect to your medical training in psychiatry, let's look at this objectively. DL is purely reactionary to their antics. New threads launch when he or she or both of them together manage to fuck it up yet again in a seemingly endless quest to promote themselves for whatever their purpose. They are jokes. They are risible. They are fodder. DL isn't here to create new philosophies of moral purpose. We're crows, they're carrion. Now I know you're here to earn what you are paid in an hour or perhaps your life is so empty and marginal that you can overlook the facts in front of you so this piece of work is actually someone you admire, but then the disorder seems to fall on you, not us. We're just having fun and turning phrases over two fools who can't help themselves. It's not our fault they do it all the time.

by Anonymousreply 247May 27, 2022 2:28 AM

Also, the search function is about as good at searching as she is at PR, so half the time you get multiple threads about a lot of things.

by Anonymousreply 248May 27, 2022 2:29 AM

R222, you are thinking of Aberfan where a slack heap collapsed after heavy rain and buried a school. 144 people mostly children were killed. My dad, then a young man, had to go and help dig out the bodies. He would never speak of it. The Queen was criticised for not visiting sooner I think.

I believe Meghan does things with good intentions but she just goes about them in a thoughtless manner. I think Jane Austen’s words work well for her in that she neither deserves such praise nor such censure. The meaning behind her actions is good but she needs to carry out those actions with a little more thought for how they will affect others. I think she might have dressed a little more respectfully but otherwise I think there is no harm in going to lay flowers.

by Anonymousreply 249May 27, 2022 2:30 AM

Bravo, r247

by Anonymousreply 250May 27, 2022 2:30 AM

R200

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 251May 27, 2022 2:31 AM

R242. I’m aware you claimed not to care about her. (I know how to read.). It’s just clear you must have some special concern for her to complain about people doing to her what they do to every celebrity here.

One of the main reasons she is yakked abut so much here is that she laud s lot of money and puts on a lot of effort to be talked smote.

by Anonymousreply 252May 27, 2022 2:31 AM

"The duchess took the trip in a personal capacity as a mother, to offer her condolences and support in person to a community experiencing unimaginable grief, her spokesperson told People."

She has no other capacity!!! She's really a nobody. William really had her number from the get go.

by Anonymousreply 253May 27, 2022 2:34 AM

Look at the OP's link, R217.

by Anonymousreply 254May 27, 2022 2:35 AM

Still with the duchess bullshit.

by Anonymousreply 255May 27, 2022 2:35 AM

R248, sorry pal, but you are way too naive.

by Anonymousreply 256May 27, 2022 2:35 AM

^^^^Should have been R249

by Anonymousreply 257May 27, 2022 2:36 AM

The people who cape for her are codependents who are in thrall to a Megan type in real life. Their entire being depends on viewing her kind pathology as benign.

Or they’re people just like her.

by Anonymousreply 258May 27, 2022 2:36 AM

They really warmed, and turned up the contrast in those pictures of her. South Texas isnt that lush, green right now at the moment, and she wasn't that dark in the polo pictures.

by Anonymousreply 259May 27, 2022 2:36 AM

R251 Why is she wearing a serene Mona Lisa with her head bowed at a memorial for a violently killed10 year old?

by Anonymousreply 260May 27, 2022 2:38 AM

[quote] The meaning behind her actions is good

Her father, family, in-laws, co-workers, insubordinates, ex-husband, BRF, former friends, celebrities and much of the British and American populace would disagree.

We went to school with Markle (my sister was in her class), and rest assured, the “meaning behind her actions” is NOT good.

She is one of the worst people - if not the VERY worst - we’ve ever encountered.

by Anonymousreply 261May 27, 2022 2:39 AM

Worst of all, she's wearing a black bra under that white t shirt!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 262May 27, 2022 2:44 AM

Didn't make the NYT, didn't make The Washington Post, didn't make CNN.

Fail.

by Anonymousreply 263May 27, 2022 2:45 AM

Someone at Sunshine Sachs described her as "not a good person." That's before she hired them.

by Anonymousreply 264May 27, 2022 2:45 AM

This cunt is banking on the naïveté (stupidity) of people who ascribe good motives to her. Apparently there are many naive (stupid) people out there.

After all, Donald Trump was somehow elected.

by Anonymousreply 265May 27, 2022 2:45 AM

Wow, those extensions.

by Anonymousreply 266May 27, 2022 2:46 AM

Another video that does her no favours.Sorry if already posted by someone else.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 267May 27, 2022 2:46 AM

Sorry that your panties are twisted in a bunch, Della

Not everyone exhibits your sensitivity and compassion.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 268May 27, 2022 2:47 AM

[quote] She went with little fanfare. In a moment like this, you have to believe her motives stemmed from sympathy and empathy

You stans will feel foolish when this footage shows up in an episode of their Netflix reality show. (Because that is why she showed up there.)

by Anonymousreply 269May 27, 2022 2:48 AM

R263, the LA Times wrote about her top-secret anonymous incognito but oh-so-charitable visit.

And then it veered off and talked about some nobody who died or something. How annoying!

by Anonymousreply 270May 27, 2022 2:48 AM

That video. Omg.

by Anonymousreply 271May 27, 2022 2:49 AM

If she had some kind of connection to Texas, this might be somewhat understandable. But she doesn't. If she's so caring, why doesn't she show up at every disaster?

by Anonymousreply 272May 27, 2022 2:50 AM

Let's face it gurls, she is a horrible person and you all know it in your heart of hearts. For those like Lani "who will always have her back because she is bi-racial" or the Lipstick Alley fraus, surely there is another black or mixed race person who deserves your admiration more. I think at this point you are hanging on out of defiance and not sincere affection.

by Anonymousreply 273May 27, 2022 2:52 AM

Before today, I thought Meghan was just a dumb Z list actress. A former yacht whore. A woman who used to have a blowjob video on xvideos dot com. A woman who cheated on Cory Vitiello and married Harry for his cash and connections. A woman who tossed her family and friends aside as she climbed dick after dick to get ahead. Another typical Hollywood vain user and loser.

But now?? Using beautiful children who were brutally gunned down for attention by being the first celebrity to show up?? And this was a planned trip its not like she lives nearby either and could swing by for support. I have no words to describe this. She is scum. Lower than the lowest piece of human garbage. I wouldnt piss on her if she was on fire.

by Anonymousreply 274May 27, 2022 2:53 AM

Looks like she turned up the tanning.

by Anonymousreply 275May 27, 2022 2:53 AM

r232 Why didnt she do this for the shooting in Buffalo of black people? That is something that is being asked on reddit and internet forums?

r225 Deep down she fears irrelevance.In her heart she knows its coming some day and she dreads it even though her ego blocks out the uncomfortable fact.

by Anonymousreply 276May 27, 2022 2:53 AM

R263. That’s the irony. They despise the British tabloids, but they are the only media who give them any regular attention.

by Anonymousreply 277May 27, 2022 2:54 AM

Link doesn’t work r267

by Anonymousreply 278May 27, 2022 2:55 AM

“Between this picture and the video I don’t know how anyone could doubt she was virtue signaling for the photo op and Netflix…”

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 279May 27, 2022 2:55 AM

r278 Just clicked on it again and it works ok for me?

by Anonymousreply 280May 27, 2022 2:56 AM

She did have a "crew" with her if you count the bodyguard, the assistant, and the photographer.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 281May 27, 2022 2:58 AM

I could maybe understand if she had family there or maybe even understand if she was involved with something like the Red Cross and was actually doing something. But just for a photo op? I never understand why people put down all those teddy bears and flowers, it just seems wasteful and a mess somebody has to clean up.

by Anonymousreply 282May 27, 2022 3:00 AM

R22 My view is that many of the people who put down teddy bears and flowers do so to be seeing putting down teddy bears and flowers.

It’s the Diana effect.

by Anonymousreply 283May 27, 2022 3:03 AM

[quote] He can start a new family and Meghan can keep the kids.

Damn, that's cold. What did those kids do to deserve that?

by Anonymousreply 284May 27, 2022 3:04 AM

She's going to spin this as a pap attack.

"I was innocently paying my respects, trying to be private, but then cameras spotted me and wouldn't let me have this private moment. They chase me everywhere! They won't stop until they kill me exactly like they killed Diana!

by Anonymousreply 285May 27, 2022 3:07 AM

This is so craven. It’s a Valerie Cherish-level stunt, but worse, because even Val would know not to use murdered schoolchildren to garner a little press.

by Anonymousreply 286May 27, 2022 3:10 AM

[quote] It’s a Valerie Cherish-level stunt, but worse, because even Val would know not to use murdered schoolchildren to garner a little press

TOTALLY! As you said, even fucking Valerie Cherish (especially season 2 VC) wouldn't do some dumb shit like this. I was think of her when she says "why don't I just jump on a landmine" in her Aunt Sassy voice.

by Anonymousreply 287May 27, 2022 3:14 AM

Michelle Obama would be disgusted.

by Anonymousreply 288May 27, 2022 3:15 AM

There is one thing we can be grateful for. Those surviving children will be so traumatized. At least she wasn't gifting boxes of The Bench.

by Anonymousreply 289May 27, 2022 3:17 AM

And then sending the bill to their parents, r289

by Anonymousreply 290May 27, 2022 3:19 AM

Works for me, r287. Scene opens with a Duchess Baseball Cap squatting in front of a row of wooden crosses for her photo op. Her linty-weaved head bends reverently toward her respectfully sneaker-shod size 11s. A fat man stands in front of the video camera. HRH, black brassiere showing coyly under a boyish white Hanes tee, turns around to supervise the still camera photographer who’s shooting the flowers she’s just put on the ground.

End scene.

by Anonymousreply 291May 27, 2022 3:21 AM

She's a fucking embarrassment.

by Anonymousreply 292May 27, 2022 3:25 AM

R292, she should be embarrassed, but she’s not. She thinks she knocked it out of the park. And so do some others.

Let that cunt come and grandstand on their dead kids, see how they feel about it then.

by Anonymousreply 293May 27, 2022 3:29 AM

She states she was there as “a mother” and as a private citizen.

Why else would she bloody br there? She has no official capacity....so why else would survive come?

She flies thousands of miles away from her OWN children for a photo op to place flowers and take photos with volunteers?

This was clearly PR: Netflix refuses to comment when asked about this shenanigan. But it comes off as exceedingly craven.

And there are posters here saying what a good deed this was? They are as crazy as she is.

by Anonymousreply 294May 27, 2022 3:30 AM

Most mothers are hugging their kids a little tighter and thinking of how awful it would be to lose their children. They're not leaving their kids and flying several miles away for a PR stunt. She is disturbed.

by Anonymousreply 295May 27, 2022 3:31 AM

Meghan needs content for Netflix. As she and Harry never do anything, the cupboard is bare. She probably got the idea after Buffalo and prepared for the next mass shooting.

by Anonymousreply 296May 27, 2022 3:33 AM

If Netflix or any other staff photographer weren't there, why haven'tv her winged PR monkey denied it?

by Anonymousreply 297May 27, 2022 3:36 AM

This girl ain't right.

by Anonymousreply 298May 27, 2022 3:36 AM

They wisely talked her out of wearing Daisy Dukes and high heels.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 299May 27, 2022 3:40 AM

Even the Kardashians wouldn’t sink this low to grab photo ops and show content.

by Anonymousreply 300May 27, 2022 3:42 AM

[quote] no one thinks it's despicable except for you Meghan-hating lunatics who obsess over her and her every move. Just admit you secretly want to have sex with her, and move on.

Why would gay men want to penetrate her smelly flappy clam?

by Anonymousreply 301May 27, 2022 3:43 AM

No one wants to see her in Daisy dukes.

by Anonymousreply 302May 27, 2022 3:46 AM

We're apparently jealous of her "beautiful black Markle pussy".

by Anonymousreply 303May 27, 2022 3:46 AM

"It's funny, we didn't even know it was her until after she left and now we're so sad. I mean, to be honest, we thought she was our neighbor."

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 304May 27, 2022 3:47 AM

I want to see the video of Meghan ambushing the blood donation site with her pallets of food and water.

Guess I’ll have to wait for the Netflix show.

by Anonymousreply 305May 27, 2022 3:48 AM

[quote] "It's funny, we didn't even know it was her until after she left and now we're so sad. I mean, to be honest, we thought she was our neighbor."

They live next door to a pineapple under the sea?

by Anonymousreply 306May 27, 2022 3:49 AM

Did buzzfeed pay these volunteers for comments?

by Anonymousreply 307May 27, 2022 3:50 AM

They thought she was a neighbour because they couldn’t imagine anyone idiot enough to fly thousands of miles to deliver sandwiches. Did she look into a delivery option first?

by Anonymousreply 308May 27, 2022 3:52 AM

Who wants a ham sammich? Getcha ham sammich here.

by Anonymousreply 309May 27, 2022 3:56 AM

R304, you would think the $6,900 Cartier Love Bracelet and Diana’s $23,000 Cartier Tank Watch that Megs was sporting would have tipped them off.

by Anonymousreply 310May 27, 2022 4:05 AM

Were the sandwiches important from California? Eleganza!

by Anonymousreply 311May 27, 2022 4:09 AM

Imported!!!

by Anonymousreply 312May 27, 2022 4:09 AM

When it comes to others, Narckle is cheap. Someone said she sent her crew to Costco for the shit.

by Anonymousreply 313May 27, 2022 4:10 AM

At least there is no evidence so far that she awkwardly clapped to herself.

by Anonymousreply 314May 27, 2022 4:15 AM

[quote] When it comes to others, Narckle is cheap. Someone said she sent her crew to Costco for the shit.

Makes sense. The packs of Doritos did not sound like curated, all-natural, vegan, 100% organic food that she raves about and insists on eating, herself.

Peons donating blood get the cheap stuff, but only the best for Markle (decked out in $50,000 worth of jewelry), who doesn’t even donate blood. But is sure to have her photo taken at the site!

by Anonymousreply 315May 27, 2022 4:16 AM

My family has a ranch out North of Uvalde. There's no Costco, but there is a Walmart, H-E-B (my favorite), and various supermercados!

by Anonymousreply 316May 27, 2022 4:16 AM

Exploiting the devastated and bereaved. So Deplorable Megs!!

by Anonymousreply 317May 27, 2022 4:17 AM

She did her best to contribute, but the blood bank was not interested in blue blood.

by Anonymousreply 318May 27, 2022 4:18 AM

It would be more helpful if she offered to help the families with funeral and medical costs. This community doesn't need her cheap food and flowers.

by Anonymousreply 319May 27, 2022 4:23 AM

But a trophy was reported missing from the school gymnasium after her visit R314.

by Anonymousreply 320May 27, 2022 4:24 AM

The hospitals, and blood banks were asking for people with people Rh- & Rh+ O blood right after the shooting. Everyone donating now is just restocking.

by Anonymousreply 321May 27, 2022 4:27 AM

Has Harry caught up with her? He was, after all, pedaling that bike from Montecito to Uvalde.

by Anonymousreply 322May 27, 2022 4:28 AM

Do you suppose Meghan will be showing up at all future mass shooting sites? As they're so frequent that could get her at least a dozen episodes for Netflix.

by Anonymousreply 323May 27, 2022 4:28 AM

Harry stayed home to feed the chickens.

by Anonymousreply 324May 27, 2022 4:29 AM

Because anonymous mourners show up with a motorcade, a bodyguard and crew to shoo everyone else away from the memorial so they don’t have to chase them down for video releases.

Sometimes movie productions try that in NYC. No, you are a production assistant, not NYPD, and you cannot prevent me from walking into my own residence. GTFO.

I’m sorry for everyone in that town.

by Anonymousreply 325May 27, 2022 4:31 AM

If Dior would have called Smeg for a brand ambassadorship, she would have said "fuck them kids" and turned that plane around.

by Anonymousreply 326May 27, 2022 4:32 AM

Kate did this first when she "stealthy" attended the memorial of a woman killed by a british cop during covid.

by Anonymousreply 327May 27, 2022 4:33 AM

Here's the Kate memorial pap walk.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 328May 27, 2022 4:34 AM

Nope. Not even remotely the same. But you already know that.

by Anonymousreply 329May 27, 2022 4:35 AM

If this wasnt a photo op, she would actually be helping and volunteering like Sean Penn in his life raft after the hurricane, or Angelina in Ukraine and Yemen. Not just drop off a bag of fucking chips and bounce.

by Anonymousreply 330May 27, 2022 4:35 AM

She never called or sent a card after my stroke.

by Anonymousreply 331May 27, 2022 4:36 AM

Cancerous cockroach this creature.

by Anonymousreply 332May 27, 2022 4:37 AM

Are we sure she's not wearing one of those baseball caps with the built-in hair?

by Anonymousreply 333May 27, 2022 4:37 AM

Look at r329 feverishly giving herself WWs. LOL...how sad.

by Anonymousreply 334May 27, 2022 4:40 AM

She'll be pissed they caught her double chin.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 335May 27, 2022 4:41 AM

I enjoy how messy and dramatic Harry and Meghan are typically, because they inflict their drama on the equally-hilarious Royal Family - but this move is both tasteless and so, so stupid. I’m curious whether she tried to get a meeting with Beto.

Della is right, though, the lunatics in these threads who embellish all this over the top nonsense as if MM is Satan need to get a grip.

by Anonymousreply 336May 27, 2022 4:42 AM

What I think you Meg crazies fail to see is that anyone who falls under the umbrella of "celebrity" could be accused of all the things you say about her. They all make their money from being seen and talked about you just choose to spin everything this woman does in the most extreme negativity you can think of.

by Anonymousreply 337May 27, 2022 4:47 AM

R336, it’s not that serious. Until today. This stunt is incredible. I’m still aghast.

But yeah. Usually it’s amusing and I don’t mind the BRF getting trolled. Some people stan for Kate as a sort of reactive reflex (I guess), but I think that’s silly.

by Anonymousreply 338May 27, 2022 4:48 AM

How does she manage to have a double chin and toothpick legs?

by Anonymousreply 339May 27, 2022 4:49 AM

I'm also talking to you r336. You aren't slick opening your post with shade to then try to act like you are one of the sane ones in your comment about Della.

You are full of shit too 338, just as insane as the rest.

by Anonymousreply 340May 27, 2022 4:50 AM

R337, celebrities usually have a talent.

by Anonymousreply 341May 27, 2022 4:51 AM

That was true in the past 341, not so much now.

by Anonymousreply 342May 27, 2022 4:53 AM

No need to scold R336. We know the difference between MM and Satan.

Satan looks good in red and he doesn’t have back fat.

by Anonymousreply 343May 27, 2022 4:56 AM

Ooh, smell r337!

Is there a spreadsheet? Are lawyers being consulted?

by Anonymousreply 344May 27, 2022 4:56 AM

They did her dirty with pic on the bottom right. She truly looks like a square with her flat ass.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 345May 27, 2022 4:58 AM

Lame @343

by Anonymousreply 346May 27, 2022 5:01 AM

Toothpick arms and legs, no boobs, no ass, wide waist and hips. Long ugly hair extensions that dont flatter her face (compared to her cute haircut in Suits). Botched nose job. Capped huge teeth.

What does Harry actually see in her? Its not like he was dazzled by someone with stunning features/proportionate face/body. Her personality as we have seen already in interviews isnt one of a warm loving person either.

by Anonymousreply 347May 27, 2022 5:01 AM

You can also see her back fat through the tee shirt.

by Anonymousreply 348May 27, 2022 5:02 AM

I see that several of the nurses for the geriatric gays here haven't put them to bed yet.

Go to sleeeeep

by Anonymousreply 349May 27, 2022 5:03 AM

Such a class act.

by Anonymousreply 350May 27, 2022 5:04 AM

I think it was just so fast how she got herself out there. Like she couldn't wait to seize the moment.

Hurry, someone book a flight! Get a florist on the line and make sure we have people at the memorial. Gind out wheee volunteers are and then call up a deli and order some sandwiches! What else? Right, let me throw on jeans and a baseball cap so this all looks spur of the moment and heartfelt.

by Anonymousreply 351May 27, 2022 5:07 AM

What a transparently foolish, egocentric, desperate and cynical ploy.

Does she think she brings any value to such an abominable stunt? A second-rate actress with notable greed and ignorance attempts to leap into "maven of humanity and sex/race equity and fashion" role and stumbles, landing at a Texas massacre site and gawking as if she's giving Harry a fetish erection in emulating Diana's flower acres.

God, Stupid cunt. Of course her father is very ill with a stroke, and she's.......

by Anonymousreply 352May 27, 2022 5:07 AM

The posters obsessed with back fat are the same obsessive fraus who come to DL solely to post endlessly about Meghan Markle, there are plenty of real things to criticize her for, no need to be delusional!

by Anonymousreply 353May 27, 2022 5:09 AM

I can't believe the Harkles haven't released a statement on the tragedy yet. The world needs to know their opinion!

by Anonymousreply 354May 27, 2022 5:14 AM

Her deranged fans claim she brings visibility to this tragedy. As if it wasn't already front page news everywhere.

by Anonymousreply 355May 27, 2022 5:15 AM

Are megloons blind as well as dumb? You can clearly see her back fat in that photo above. That ain't no delusion.

by Anonymousreply 356May 27, 2022 5:17 AM

They are speechless, r354.

by Anonymousreply 357May 27, 2022 5:17 AM

But they always say when they're speechless, R357.

by Anonymousreply 358May 27, 2022 5:19 AM

Harry is too busy tapping the night away in the chicken coop.

by Anonymousreply 359May 27, 2022 5:22 AM

Lame. That’s all you got R346? Try harder.

Then, go fuck yourself.

by Anonymousreply 360May 27, 2022 5:27 AM

I can’t believe the fucktards on this thread that are triggered by the mention of her back fat.

She’s got back fat. Get over it,

by Anonymousreply 361May 27, 2022 5:31 AM

[quote] What I think you Meg crazies fail to see is that anyone who falls under the umbrella of "celebrity" could be accused of all the things you say about her. They all make their money from being seen and talked about you just choose to spin everything this woman does in the most extreme negativity you can think of.

The public is not so easily fooled. Meghan Markle’s thirst has been well documented.....as has her relationship with the truth. She has lied. This was documented in a court of law. Also, a head of state has demurely retorted with “Recollections May Vary” in response to her claims. Additionally, Markle’s grifting and false sense of compassion is plain to see for those who have eyes: she has treated her families like sh*t, and then moaned endlessly about the injustices the world has inflicted upon her. It is revolting.

She is not a royal. She is not a celebrity. This recent act of hers to utilize a devastating tragedy for her own purposes is beyond the pale. It is crazy.

Would rethink who the “crazies” are, R337. Look in the mirror.

by Anonymousreply 362May 27, 2022 5:34 AM

Hmm, couldn't she visit her dying father? In a private capacity? As a daughter?

by Anonymousreply 363May 27, 2022 5:41 AM

MM could kill a toddler in broad daylight and her pathetic followers would claim she is only bringing awareness and stamping out the stigma of toddler death. They are trump supporter crazy.

by Anonymousreply 364May 27, 2022 5:43 AM

[quote] MM could kill a toddler in broad daylight and her pathetic followers would claim she is only bringing awareness and stamping out the stigma of toddler death. They are trump supporter crazy.

They really are. The excuses to minimize her heinous behaviour are fascinating. “She’s just like every other celebrity!” “Haters just want to say negative things about her!” “She has good intentions!”

It’s the Trump-level delusion all over again. This time again for a former Z-Lister. Funny that.

Trump and Markle are similar in many ways, so perhaps it is no surprise that the same level of denial and blind devotion is seen in those who support them; despite the vile, self-serving, deleterious acts both Trump and Markle employ.

by Anonymousreply 365May 27, 2022 5:50 AM

Netflix has them by the cuntbone to MAKE CONTENT! They’ve let them know that upfront advance ain’t free, honey. She and her vile husband are both in a manic panic, filming really inappropriate stuff for their reality show. The polo thing was amusing. This is just monstrous. What a soulless creature she must be to crave publicity from the deaths of innocents.

You can picture her getting the idea in her head and come hell or highwater, there was no reasoning with her. She’s ALWAYS right.

by Anonymousreply 366May 27, 2022 6:00 AM

According to the other Harkle thread, the person who insulted Smeg's ankles is now being watched by CIA and on their way to being arrested by black twitter.

Alright, which one of you insulted her ankles?

by Anonymousreply 367May 27, 2022 6:01 AM

Im sure in the months ahead during their nightmares and PTSD flashbacks, the first responders, medics, police, and grieving parents will appreciate that a flat chested nobody in a Hanes tee with Back Fat "comforted" them with sandwiches and bags of chips.

by Anonymousreply 368May 27, 2022 6:02 AM

Me 😔 R367.

I'm dead meat. Datalounge will be shut down because of poor little moi.

by Anonymousreply 369May 27, 2022 6:03 AM

R369 We’re all Spartacus.

by Anonymousreply 370May 27, 2022 6:05 AM

Thank you, R370

by Anonymousreply 371May 27, 2022 6:08 AM

Alright, I'll start a gofundme for your bail and defense, 369. Call me from the clink.

by Anonymousreply 372May 27, 2022 6:11 AM

We will send you positivity messages on bunches of bananas R369.

Be sure to let us know when your Write a Prisoner account is set up.

by Anonymousreply 373May 27, 2022 6:39 AM

Her kids are off limits but she is free to exploit and monetize murdered kids?

Animal.

by Anonymousreply 374May 27, 2022 6:54 AM

Duchess of Attention Whore-Ism?....It is sad that Harry wasn't man enough to just leave the monarchy and move to America on his own (which is what Diana wanted to do but didn't want to be separated from her kids).. I think Harry is Bi like Uncle Edward VIII...

by Anonymousreply 375May 27, 2022 9:46 AM

Time to cancel r113 Della, the cuntess of Datalounge.

by Anonymousreply 376May 27, 2022 10:44 AM

[quote] Netflix has them by the cuntbone to MAKE CONTENT

Yeah, but does she look unwilling? She didn’t look unhappy on that tractor stage, or sashaying around a polo field.

She’s like Br’er Rabbit in the briar patch. It’s her dream in life to have an A-lister’s hulk guarding her, cameras following her every move, people arguing over her. She’s a pig in shit.

by Anonymousreply 377May 27, 2022 11:02 AM

I don’t think I’m obsessed with her, and in the past I think some of the criticism of her has been over the top. I think the DM coverage of her is bullying - whoever she is married to, she is an individual and they are mostly anonymous media giant. It’s not a fair fight. And some of it HAS seemed sort of racist. Or at least classist in a “who does she think she is?” Sort of way.

But I really don’t understand how anyone can defend this. If it’s OK (or even desirable) for her to be there, why isn’t everyone there? Clogging up the streets and making daily routines difficult for grieving residents. Should I be there? Why aren’t you there? Sure, she’s probably not bothering anyone, but that’s only because it’s just her. 99.999999999999% of the world isn’t stupid and self-absorbed enough to show up. Does she think she’s the only American who can afford sandwiches and a flight?

And she and her husband have the nerve to try and make bank with some stupid app that tells you to be cognizant of the environment when you vacation. So I’m supposed to think twice before taking my one vacation, but she can fly a thousand miles to drop off flowers and snacks?

She’s awful. And so, so fucking stupid. I really thought she was a reasonably bright person who had been encouraged to believe that she was much smarter than she is. I was wrong. She is an idiot.

by Anonymousreply 378May 27, 2022 11:06 AM

Della, (R113) I'm trying to understand your rationale, because I get the basic argument that excess and this individual often go hand in hand here, but this time there's factors:

A controversial figure, known for demonstrating concern through efforts that could be argued are ill thought out (bananas, remembrance visits, for example), shows up in the middle of nowhere within three days of a mass shooting, where nineteen children died in terror, presumably shielded as much as they could be by two teachers who died with them. It is established some of them were blown to bits. As of yesterday, the names of all twenty-one murder victims still hadn't been released. The cops haven't released the scene. Serious questions are emerging about the handling of the emergency. The funerals haven't been held. The President hasn't visited yet. The national debate and fury and frustration rages again. Everybody with any decency is feeling strong emotions, again. Even here. There were heaps of appropriate and discreet alternatives to demonstrate a depth of feeling rather than travelling over a thousand miles at this particular moment. Nobody else of note has. Advisors might tell you that. You might listen, depending on your motivation.

So is it surprising a figure popular who attracts attention for many different reasons provokes a strong reaction on DL in these specific circumstances?

You've been here since the 1920s. It really surprises you DL goes hardcore DL in consideration of all these specific circumstances? Muted isn't a word you'd attach to the joint on a good day. There may be excess in some posts, there is definitely a level of revulsion in most posts that surprised me in the evident depth of feeling, but in any event, realistically, talk about hoisted with your own petard, in consideration of all those circumstances. You bewilder me, Della.

I'm not asking you to defend your position, you have. I just think you've really got it wrong on this one, as you often seem to for some odd reason, where this person is involved.

by Anonymousreply 379May 27, 2022 12:32 PM

R353 is carrying enough bacon on her back and sides to bring Dennys back.

by Anonymousreply 380May 27, 2022 12:47 PM

R378: I’m with you. Last week’s polo bitchfest was fun for a while until it got to the point of pure nonsense. She showed up at a polo game overdressed (funny) and nabbed the spotlight during the trophy ceremony (funny and thirsty).

But the harping about wiping lipstick off Harry was just stupid. Made us look petty! And we are petty! But that extra reach for pettiness is beneath us!

This stunt, however, deserves the outrage. It’s the first time I haven’t been merely amused by her antics but actually appalled by them. I’d feel this way if any random celebrity tried to muscle in on a tragedy in this fashion.

Whether she brought a camera crew or not, the kneeling at the memorial markers are so obviously staged. She so obviously knew she was being photographed.

We’re certain to get more details on the background of her visit, but I think the chances that this was not another clumsy grab for the spotlight are razor thin.

Remember this ridiculous pix of Harry and her laying a wreath at some random cemetery after RF said he was no longer part of Remembrance Day ceremony in England?

Why do you think their coms directors keep jumping ship?

by Anonymousreply 381May 27, 2022 12:52 PM

I wonder if Netflix "docu-series" will present all these things as virtuous and impressive (the polo "award ceremony" and kiss; the private-flight condolence trip to Texas; and I shudder to think what they'll get up to at the Jubbly) -- anyway, are Netflix going to try to make her out as an icon of virtue and upper-class style? Will they try to make it neutral so people can make their own judgment? Or just present her as a reality-show nutcase like Kate Gosselin (with whom she shares many characteristics)

by Anonymousreply 382May 27, 2022 12:57 PM

If she was smart she would issue a humble statement: My sympathy and grief for the children, teachers and families of Uvalde drew me there yesterday. I am deeply sorry my visit is being interpreted as about anything other than them. Their suffering and recovery is all that matters.

by Anonymousreply 383May 27, 2022 12:58 PM

Yes, yes, R18, but what did she DO with the baseball cap? Did she give it away to someone who had the sun in their eyes? Was there a camera crew filming her virtue signalling?

by Anonymousreply 384May 27, 2022 1:00 PM

Netflix declined to confirm or deny their crew was there yesterday.

by Anonymousreply 385May 27, 2022 1:37 PM

Does that video circulating confirm that she did a repeat of knelling at the memorial to ensure they got a good shot? Sure seems that way but wonder what the consensus is.

by Anonymousreply 386May 27, 2022 1:54 PM

Yes. she needed two takes. She also removed her black mask before squatting.

by Anonymousreply 387May 27, 2022 1:57 PM

If it's a bad and obvious idea, the odds probably favour it.

by Anonymousreply 388May 27, 2022 2:08 PM

If the “docu-series” is ever actually aired, I’m guessing Netflix will edit this footage out.

by Anonymousreply 389May 27, 2022 2:43 PM

One of the cameramen with her in Texas was also filming her at the Invictus Games.

Anyone still trying to insist that this was all about those kids and not All About Meghan could probably also be persuaded that the sun goes around the earth.

48 hours, she couldn't even wait longer than two days to get her fat arse out there.

And she wore a fucking black bra plainly visible under a white tshirt. Uncombed hair, lingerie visible . . .

Why is this woman ALWAYS calling attention to her fucking brassieres?!

This woman is fuckiing TRASH.

by Anonymousreply 390May 27, 2022 2:59 PM

You can definitely argue the tabloid coverage of her was misogynist and classist, but there’s not much evidence of racism. The tabloids are always relentless against women who marry into the royal family, particularly if the marriage is viewed as a big social leap for the bride. It’s true that there was one headline that can be viewed as appealing to racist sentiments (in the US edition of the DM). I’m pretty sure, however, that , if Meghan were a white woman from Appalachia the DM would have run similar headlines about her background. Catherine was given exactly the same treatment. She was routinely mocked for her perceived determination to marry into the royal family at all costs and for having a flight attendant mother, of all things. The difference is that Catherine accepted that she wasn’t living in an authoritarian state that could sensor any comments that displeased her and let the coverage exhaust itself. No one is particularly interested at this point in commenting on Catherine’s middle class past.

The other injustices Meghan and her defenders liked to cite were merely absurd. One article praises Catherine for eating avocados while another criticises Meghan for eating them. In a free society different commentators are going to criticise one person for something and praise another person for doing the exact same thing. There is no thought police to ensure everybody in Britain has the same opinion on every issue.

by Anonymousreply 391May 27, 2022 3:23 PM

Interesting bit: on twitter people were posting that Beto had gone to give blood. Just after that was posted, Meghan hightailed it to the blood bank having sent a minion to buy a shitload of Fritos at the grocery store as a generous gift for those giving blood. She arrives there - discreetly of course - hoping to get a photo op with Beto. He'd already left. lol And no, she did not donate blood.

by Anonymousreply 392May 27, 2022 3:33 PM

At a time when reality shows comprise a significant amount of entertainment creating the new brand of celebrity, nepotism is more rampant than ever in Hollywood and has infiltrated into fashion modeling, social media can kill careers just as fast as they have begun and win insane wannabe billionaires the presidency, the fools here on datalounge declare MM as the worst of the worst even saying she is Satan.

And you all still can't see how fucked up your brains are.

by Anonymousreply 393May 27, 2022 3:37 PM

Megham wants Beto’s ginormous cock

by Anonymousreply 394May 27, 2022 3:48 PM

I don’t think people are routinely calling her Satan . Meghan is unique, however, among celebrities.. The main difference is that she schemed her way into a public title with the express intention of using it corruptly and unethically. That is true of almost no other celebrity. On top of that, she insulted and lied about the country and family that gave her the title inngood faith. That alone is reason enough for her stupidity and vileness to be a matter of more public comment than usual. However, in addition, she has several disturbing traits that some celebrities exhibit, but that are rarely exhibited in perfect combination by any celebrity.

1. Ste has absolutely mo talent to justify her celebrity. 2. She constantly spouts the most childish and obvious lies. 3. She is really vile to other people. 4. She has the most childish, out-of-date view of celebrity imaginable 5. She insists on being in the news multiple times a week. 6. She insists despite her obvious horribleness that she is some kind of humanitarian.

by Anonymousreply 395May 27, 2022 3:49 PM

Beto wisely avoids celebrity photo ops like the plague.

by Anonymousreply 396May 27, 2022 3:50 PM

The fact that even CNN is too embarrassed to report on the says pretty much everything...

by Anonymousreply 397May 27, 2022 4:02 PM

She looks like she isn’t even royal!

by Anonymousreply 398May 27, 2022 4:08 PM

That's a good title for the reality show -- ALL ABOUT MEGAN (costarring in much smaller type, Prince Whatshisname)

by Anonymousreply 399May 27, 2022 4:16 PM

I haven't had a good opinion of Meghan since her wedding when I decided she's a publicity hound. Countless stories in the DM on how she's the Queen's/Charles's favorite and gets special treatment etc. turned me off even more. There are some hateful blogs about her. Thank God for Dl which ridicules her with witty humor and without out too much racism and right wing politics. Her showing up in this town is disgusting and I'm sure she'll make a comparison to her nemesis Kate. However, some of the speculation is a little over the top. Meghan just showing up to this event i with a body guard and flying private is disgusting enough whether or not she brought a camera crew. If this is confirmed that is another matter. So far major media hasn't highlighted her visit. Even with click bait Yahoo , it was in the entertainment section.

by Anonymousreply 400May 27, 2022 4:29 PM

I agree, R391. I'd also add that the British tabloid press is very similar to Australia's in that they'll rip you to bits to see how you take it. If you whinge about it, they'll gleefully escalate the negative coverage. But if you suck it up and keep smiling, eventually they accept you and often become quite protective of you. It's almost like a test.

They're absolute bullies of course, but it's the nature of the beast. Catherine's made of sterner stuff - and she knows what the Brit press is like - so she weathered the storm. Meghan thought she was the new Diana and expected A-list coverage. That was never going to happen.

by Anonymousreply 401May 27, 2022 4:37 PM

You have to know the Daily Mail is digging on this. Clarifying the jet. Clarifying the camera crew. Clarifying the Twitter video. Does the current Mail content not seem unusually subdued? She is their favourite. I think something's up.

by Anonymousreply 402May 27, 2022 5:01 PM

LOL that slut’s legal team is having the videos and pictures showing her camera crew removed from sites. Cat is out of the bag dumb bitch.

by Anonymousreply 403May 27, 2022 6:21 PM

Save the vid, spread it, too. The camera crew is clearly accompanying her.

Miss Della has been pretty silent for the past hours, btw. I wonder why . . .

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 404May 27, 2022 6:58 PM

This stunt is monstrous. Note that Markle shows up with protection via a bodyguard with guns. Guns. Unbelievable.

What is also unbelievable is that she whined and lamented that she would not “serve her children up on a platter”; yet she has no issue serving the horrific deaths of other children (and adults) up on her own very personal publicity platter.

Given all she’s complained about and thrown out against everyone, this flies in absolute contradiction to her accusations. Her level of hypocrisy is stunning.

The fact that she takes this and turns it into a personal PR opportunity is diabolical. Those who support or excuse this action.....yes Della, that’s you....are delusional and equally complicit.

by Anonymousreply 405May 27, 2022 7:04 PM

Despicable. I hope this stunt will backfire on her MASSIVELY.

by Anonymousreply 406May 27, 2022 7:08 PM

How long did dear Megs stay I town offering her comfort to the stricken town?

by Anonymousreply 407May 27, 2022 7:11 PM

As if this monstrous cunt couldn't get any worse. She is now micromanaging her paid lackeys at Buzzfeed to correct the article about her donating food. The duchass made them clarify that she donated LARGE CRATES of food, not bags. She also made that Ellie flunkie tweet the correction, strongly emphasizing the amount of food the crate can hold, AND a fucking photo of said crate. A FUCKING PHOTO OF THE CRATE. This Buzzfeed cunt has been tweeting about this all day. Because such a thing must be the focus and not some dead kids. The attention must remain on Meg's generosity and not murdered children. This is some next level insanity.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 408May 27, 2022 7:12 PM

R328 Kate did not bring her “crew” to lay flowers. Meghan: “She was just really sweet," another volunteer, Georjean Burnell, 46, told BuzzFeed News. "She just kind of walked in with her crew and started putting ice waters in the bucket with us and laying out chips for the people who were needing snacks before and after donating."

by Anonymousreply 409May 27, 2022 7:17 PM

It would be hilarious if it weren’t so horrific. Whoever said it in Morocco said it best: she’s repugnant.

by Anonymousreply 410May 27, 2022 7:20 PM

The photos were sold to OK! mag. It's also a paid for trend on twitter. She made money on the backs of dead kids. There are no words.

by Anonymousreply 411May 27, 2022 7:21 PM

R328 doing the typical Sussex Squad thing: Disparaging Kate.

Guess what? Kate went there incognito, she was recognised by hardly anyone attending the vigil.

Meghan, on the other hand, takes her camera crew with her and feigns sadness and distress in the most despicable way.

And now stfu and crawl back to LSA or Celebitchy or wherever you came from.

by Anonymousreply 412May 27, 2022 7:24 PM

How does a big fucking nobody like Narkle just walk in to the blood drive and start handling everything?

by Anonymousreply 413May 27, 2022 7:24 PM

Perhaps an intrepid young reporter will investigate this whole ordeal:

1) Did the Eco Warrior fly in a private jet thousands of miles with her “team” for this “opportunity”?

2) How many people did she bring along with her for this “event”?

3) Was Netflix involved?

4) Is it true, others were ushered away from the memorial so as to obtain the perfect pic of Megs...alone?

5) Is it true Markle et al originally wished to visit the site (aka school) of the massacre, but were forbidden?

6) Why did she visit the blood center if not donating blood?

7) Why was it necessary to EXACTLY clarify what all she donated in excruciating detail to the community blood center: going so far as to have news articles recant what they reported?

8) Why were others relating that “she was so nice!” and “ she was so sweet!” at the Community Centre?[bold] These are common refrains in relation to Markle and the PR behind her.[/bold]

9) Is it true that some of her photos of this stunt were haggled (via Markle’s team) to OK Magazine?

An expose on this would be interesting.

Any takers???? Daily Mail? Telegraph??

After the deception pulled by The Harkles at the most recent Santa Barbara polo event*, exposing even more deception of them at the site of a major USA massacre would be something.

by Anonymousreply 414May 27, 2022 7:30 PM

You should tweet this and @ all the royal reporters.

by Anonymousreply 415May 27, 2022 7:36 PM

[quote] Is it true Markle et al originally wished to visit the site (aka school) of the massacre, but were forbidden?

Given her past behavior and that latest despicable stunt of hers I wouldn't put it past her.

by Anonymousreply 416May 27, 2022 7:39 PM

[quote] You should tweet this and @ all the royal reporters.

R415, I’m not on Twitter: or any social media for that matter. [sidenote: is DL considered social media!?]

Anywho, if anyone is on Twitter and so moved, please feel free to share or spread the questions as widely as possible. Would love to have clarity and transparency in regards to the duo and this most recent appearance.

by Anonymousreply 417May 27, 2022 7:40 PM

Her ratty Sally Beauty Supply weave would have been toast had any of the parents been at the memorial to catch her pulling this stunt. This barrel of shit has no shame.

by Anonymousreply 418May 27, 2022 7:48 PM

Found it!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 419May 27, 2022 7:52 PM

This bitch will sue anyone who even remotely looks at her kids yet she feels it's okay to exploit other children?

by Anonymousreply 420May 27, 2022 7:54 PM

But her spawn is ROYAL, R420!

...

by Anonymousreply 421May 27, 2022 7:55 PM

She is sick.

by Anonymousreply 422May 27, 2022 8:01 PM

Hahahahahaha, OMFG, R419

by Anonymousreply 423May 27, 2022 8:03 PM

At first I thought this was just a very broad, silly joke..but nope. With Meghan, you just can't make this *hit up.

by Anonymousreply 424May 27, 2022 8:07 PM

Yeah, I just want to quickly analyse this quote from the Buzzfeed article where they say she went privately and no one recognised her while she was donating crates ypon crates of food:

[quote]"She was just really sweet," another volunteer, Georjean Burnell, 46, told BuzzFeed News. "She just kind of walked in with her [security] crew and started putting ice waters in the bucket with us and laying out chips for the people who were needing snacks before and after donating."

[quote]"It's funny, we didn't even know it was her until after she left and now we're so sad. I mean, to be honest, we thought she was our neighbor."

So. You thought she was your neighbour, Ms Burnell, 46?

That means you're used to your Uvalde neighbours just walking in 'with their crew'? Both statements are from the same quote.

A not very well planned 'spontaneous reactions from local people', don't you find? Busted, and I find this absolutely despicable.

by Anonymousreply 425May 27, 2022 8:14 PM

Born to run

by Anonymousreply 426May 27, 2022 8:16 PM

Her creep fan cunts have infested the other thread now.

"She's publicizing the tragedy, making people aware of it!!!1!"

I'm as much as sick of her as of her obnoxious fangirls, I really am.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 427May 27, 2022 8:19 PM

No wonder she didn't take her hat off. Her weave would have gone with it. And whoever told her to put stuffing in her ass was trolling her. The material flattened with her sad ass and made her look more like a square sponge. And that black bra she uses to remind people that she's supposed to be sexy made her back fat so painfully visible in that NY Post picture.

by Anonymousreply 428May 27, 2022 8:23 PM

Meghan and Harry are both professional exploiters of the dead. That’s a weird career niche.

by Anonymousreply 429May 27, 2022 8:25 PM

She left Haze at home with the staff, staff which are nowhere nearly as good as Palace staff because the Harkles are regarded as a bad employers.

by Anonymousreply 430May 27, 2022 8:32 PM

R425 it's interesting that quote came out immediately, in the first orgasmic PR rush. Reminds me of the 'secret fly-by to the Queen, where the very first printed info was some trash about pensioners on vacation driving by Windsor Castle all waving and taking pics of the casually walking around Harkles. And then nothing mentioned again.

This time, the people supposedly didn't recognize this person who immediately began reorganizing the beverages, and then took selfies with her. I think they call it Setting The Narrative, or at least trying to.

by Anonymousreply 431May 27, 2022 8:34 PM

She is sick.

by Anonymousreply 432May 27, 2022 8:36 PM

I wonder if Harry refused to go with her or if he was excluded on purpose as in not stealing Meghan's thunder (thunder of crap, in this very case).

by Anonymousreply 433May 27, 2022 8:36 PM

Not even Wallis behaved like this.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 434May 27, 2022 8:37 PM

R430, Harry has the permanent Diana shrine to tend. Meghan has to latch on to random dead people for publicity.

by Anonymousreply 435May 27, 2022 8:37 PM

What bothers me the most is that this privileged cunt swoops in for a photo op and Netflix content. For those of you who doubt that, wait for the episode when the video is shown and she talks about how difficult it is for her seeing as she is a mother. Then, use what happened to reinforce the Harkles fears about not having the security they think they deserve.

All week long I have been watching journalists and show hosts, male and female, near tears and trying to hold it together while they report on air.

Meghan Markle is filth.

by Anonymousreply 436May 27, 2022 8:45 PM

Please, oh please use that for any new threads = "Meghan Markle Latches On To Random Dead Kids For Publicity."

"Meghan Markle Latches On To Random Dead Kids For Relevancy."

by Anonymousreply 437May 27, 2022 8:47 PM

Has there been another celeb who did this? Anyone?

by Anonymousreply 438May 27, 2022 8:49 PM

It's just so desperately tacky. Is no one advising this woman?

by Anonymousreply 439May 27, 2022 9:00 PM

None that I can think of R439.

by Anonymousreply 440May 27, 2022 9:35 PM

One of her 'team who was there is Global Galactic CEO Empress of Something or Other, and has had big corporate jobs. So I don't know if the Borderline Cooties are contagious or what, but she agreed it was a great idea.

by Anonymousreply 441May 27, 2022 9:37 PM

Well, yes. Otherwise no one would have known about the massacre. You know you have to have a Z-list, aging actress to bring attention.

by Anonymousreply 442May 27, 2022 9:40 PM

^ Mandana Dayani R441 She is on the circuit. Was at the Met Gala, Santa Barbara polo, celebrity weddings, yada yada yada

by Anonymousreply 443May 27, 2022 9:42 PM

Where is Princess Fire and Music now?

Did she jet back home to edit the footage?

by Anonymousreply 444May 27, 2022 9:46 PM

Has Della responded to R381? I've got her block but I'm curious about her reaction in that context.

by Anonymousreply 445May 27, 2022 9:48 PM

Margo C, yes, I believe angel on earth Sparkles turned right around in her private jet to do tons more savin' the earth.

by Anonymousreply 446May 27, 2022 10:21 PM

Sorry, meant R379.

by Anonymousreply 447May 27, 2022 10:30 PM

Before she driven away she was heard to exclaim, “See you. Wouldn’t want to be you”.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 448May 27, 2022 10:35 PM

Not that I can see R447.

There may be a Cheers marathon on.

by Anonymousreply 449May 27, 2022 10:43 PM

Maybe she came alone cause Harry is finally wising up and realized it could be in bad taste.

by Anonymousreply 450May 27, 2022 11:57 PM

This is the guy who wore a Nazi uniform, my little paki friend.

by Anonymousreply 451May 27, 2022 11:59 PM

This thread has attracted all the quality, high IQ posters on DL!

by Anonymousreply 452May 28, 2022 12:00 AM

Welcome aboard, r452.

by Anonymousreply 453May 28, 2022 12:22 AM

Sorry, I can't stay, r453. I need some comparatively elevated conversation to rejuvenate my brain cells, so I'm going to go find a soaps or scat thread.

by Anonymousreply 454May 28, 2022 12:28 AM

I gather that's supposed to chasten someone, somehow.

Another hope dashed for you.

by Anonymousreply 455May 28, 2022 12:31 AM

We had The Datalounge in the 1920s, R379? Really?

by Anonymousreply 456May 28, 2022 2:12 AM

Holy fucking hell. She's not stopping. That Ellie flunkie from Buzzfeed posted audio from the "director of the Uvalde community center" in which he is defending Meg. He testifies that Meg did not bring photographers with her and that people shouldn't listen to the bad things about her. Oh and how she hugged her children a little harder. I will not post the link because it is way too disgusting.

This fucking cunt is forcing the people of Uvalde to defend her while they just went through a massacre. I seriously need her to fucking crawl back to hell.

by Anonymousreply 457May 28, 2022 5:59 AM

She went to a devastated community and spoke about unfair press stories about herself and her husband.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 458May 28, 2022 6:28 AM

[Quote] If you don’t see why appearing a scant 48 hours after a massacre, camera in tow, to insert yourself in a tragedy, is abnormal, there’s no hope for you.

R129 puts it theeeeee most succinctly.

by Anonymousreply 459May 28, 2022 6:32 AM

I was listenig to the DM podcast and Richard Kay was saying that they are potentially waiting to tie in Harry's book with the release of the reality show which should hopefully be before the end of the year. He felt that this was why Meghan was scrambling to be at all the Polo events. According to him, when they were living in the UK, Meghan felt it beneath Harry to play matches unless it was 1 million or above for "charity".

I feel let down by all the Lady Collin Campbell fans b/c I rely on you for the tea, Anyhow, according to Richard Kay, apparently when Thomas Markle was coming to the UK, he was going to be staying w/ LCC's. She had planned to take him to Ascot and already had a bespoke suit made for him. I think she was going to try to force an interaction. This is important info the LCC queens omitted.

by Anonymousreply 460May 28, 2022 6:39 AM

Seriously who cares about "Lady" C

by Anonymousreply 461May 28, 2022 11:03 AM

So the story has changed then, hasn't it? They did know who she was. I thought the original story was it was all incognito all the time... mistaken for a neighbour? So either that wasn't true or a part was left out - they didn't know who she was, until they did.

by Anonymousreply 462May 28, 2022 11:21 AM

What's really telling is the handling of BuzzFeed. I mean, BuzzFeed. Talk about the dregs. And all her powerful handlers can manage is BuzzFeed.

Christ, stop wasting your money, lady, there's only so much coming in.

by Anonymousreply 463May 28, 2022 11:24 AM

Harry has only to look at Johnny Depp to see what’s in store for him. He should probably take a look at Brad Pitt, too, because he has children with HIS pretty psycho.

Last night I talked to someone who produces reality TV. She hasn’t heard anything from her Netflix contacts about the Markle show. All she knows is a bunch of people were laid off, including the woman she was working on a project with. No scoop about the Royal Reality Show.

by Anonymousreply 464May 28, 2022 11:45 AM

This abominable bitch trying to make it all about herself by telling people at the community center not to believe the stories about her in the press is another low in this entire shitshow.

Seriously, I just can't.

Any person with a sane mind just can't.

by Anonymousreply 465May 28, 2022 11:51 AM

Back Fat Markle, lol.

IMHO, this bitch is off-limits after what she has done.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 466May 28, 2022 12:34 PM

The problem isn’t how she acted when she showed up in Uvalde. The problem is that she showed up in Uvalde.

by Anonymousreply 467May 28, 2022 12:35 PM

R467, AND how she acted. She told people at the community center not to believe the stories about her that are in the media.

I mean, seriously, this vile bitch is going to a community center next to a crime scene and has got nothing better to do but to talk about herself?

by Anonymousreply 468May 28, 2022 12:40 PM

r467. Exactly. Nobody should be turning up to that community unless they have a serious reason to be there. This is just grief tourism and stinks. Just because you can doesn't mean you should.

Maybe H will start flogging disaster trips through his travel agency.

by Anonymousreply 469May 28, 2022 12:40 PM

I can sometimes admire manipulative people but she is too transparent to admire. She has no style.

by Anonymousreply 470May 28, 2022 12:40 PM

The good people of the community center in Uvalde have been MARKLED.

As if they weren’t dealing with enough.

by Anonymousreply 471May 28, 2022 12:41 PM

Whatever Netflix show eventually comes out could be comedy gold. A longer version of Andrew’s interview.

by Anonymousreply 472May 28, 2022 12:43 PM

Tbf, I'm not sure the camera crew she had in tow in Uvalde belongs to Netflix. She might have gone to Uvalde with her personal assistants and her personal photographers. You know she has got a bunch of them at hand, just think of all the pap walks she has been doing.

by Anonymousreply 473May 28, 2022 12:50 PM

R472, sometimes I wonder if Netflix is setting them up... creating car-crash must-see streaming.

by Anonymousreply 474May 28, 2022 12:52 PM

As of late, Miss Della has been conspicuously silent in this thread.

I wonder why.

by Anonymousreply 475May 28, 2022 12:53 PM

OP can't even get her name up correctly. There is no such thing as Duchess Meghan Markle. There is Meghan Markle or Meghan The Duchess of Sussex or the Duchess of Sussex.

There is no such thing as Duchess Meghan anymore than there is such a thing as Duchess Kate or Princess Diana. Only those born to those titles have their first names after the title.

Meanwhile, videos of her leaving with her cameramen, lining up the shot with her camera crew are circulating everywhere despite attempts to scrub them. It's too late.

The sugars and Megaloons are still trying desperately to paint this as solely a humanitarian act. They're making fools of themselves with those photos and videos out there.

Matthew McConaughey is visiting Uvalde today . . . except that he was fucking BORN THERE, it's his hometown, he lives in Austin where his own children are being raised, and he has made public statements about becoming involved in Texas politics, and hasn't brought a film crew with him. Those shots are real pap shots.

He's not private citizen flaunting a foreign royal title who lives 1400 miles away and made sure she was filmed getting there before anyone else.

Cold, calculating bitch.

by Anonymousreply 476May 28, 2022 1:00 PM

Turns out that the pic in R466 was apparently shared by Nacho's wife, HAHAHAHAHAHA.

by Anonymousreply 477May 28, 2022 1:02 PM

Netflix is not the Salvation Army, FFS. It is a corporation , a business with stock holders, not a good will charity. They will set them up, carve them up, mince them to pulp. whatever it takes to make a buck. Set them up to be scorned, laughed at, hell.yes, if that's what it takes. No matter what the amount they gave the dopey duo $$$, they will get it back, no matter what.

They are watching their bottom line, their numbers. If Gervais, Chapelle garner the numbers & the bank, this is what they will promote. Bye to wokey, if it ain't making $$$ anymore. If the Dook & dookess ain't making bank unless they are the laughing stock, they'll put them in clown cars w. red noses, with her backfat in full display. Corporate isn't kind.

by Anonymousreply 478May 28, 2022 1:02 PM

In all fairness, R476, I think the OP was clearly taking the piss here.

by Anonymousreply 479May 28, 2022 1:11 PM

R476. I think OP knew what he was doing.

by Anonymousreply 480May 28, 2022 1:23 PM

She flew over a thousand miles to provide ten to fifteen minutes of help. Then the director has to spend at least that much time explaining and justifying the trip. Doesn’t seem there was much of a time gain, even disregarding the length of the flight I wish the duchess thought more practically.

Or maybe it’s all Beto O’Rourke’s fault. She probably would have spent a week there digging graves etc if he hadn’t rudely pushed her out.

by Anonymousreply 481May 28, 2022 1:30 PM

At this point I honestly believe she is as stupid as her husband.

by Anonymousreply 482May 28, 2022 1:32 PM

They didn't omit any informarion; it wasn't known until after his stroke/cancellation.

by Anonymousreply 483May 28, 2022 1:38 PM

Lady C went on and on in a recent youtube video - she had arranged parties with titled people, trips to the best gentlemen's clubs in the world (two I think), said he was a mahhhvellous person, done so dirty by his narcissist daughter - just like she, Lady C, had been hard done by her narcissist mother, and she wrote a book about it, don't you know... She predicted everything, just as it's happening! don't you know. Yares ago.

I do like her puppies though. But her "questions from viewers" sure are coincidentally perfect for whatever subject she's off on, at the moment. Hmmm.

by Anonymousreply 484May 28, 2022 1:48 PM

anorexia?

by Anonymousreply 485May 28, 2022 1:58 PM

She wouldn’t be caught dead in the company of that many if she didn’t despise his daughter.

by Anonymousreply 486May 28, 2022 2:04 PM

Good article on contrary sussex behaviours.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 487May 28, 2022 2:04 PM

She should hire you, R485. And fire whoever is advising her now. A bout of anorexia might make her sympathetic. Because she has never been significantly overweight and she has gotten a lot of bullying about her appearance that was largely her Ill-fitting clothes, but went too far. And she has the type of build where she can honestly say, “I felt I had to live up to an unrealistic standard.” Because, again she’s never been fat, just has a thick torso.

She’d have to go all the way, though. Nicole Ritchie thin. And no bulimia or drunkenness. Just straight, old school, rich white girl, ballerina-style anorexia. She has to have a disorder of self-deprivation, not self indulgence. That’s the only thing that can save her now!

And then, when she bravely reveals her struggle in order to help others, she can cast a little side eye at Kate. And then what can Kate do?! Kate may or may not have an actual eating disorder, but she’s clearly obsessed with her weight (you can tell just by how she dresses, always to show off slimness). And it’s nobody’s business. But it’s not great role modeling.

Meghan will find a way to blow it, though. She’ll overdo it. Claim she was at death’s door and then it will turn out that she never weighed less than 105 pounds and was on a doctor-supervised fast. They way to play it is to get legitimately too thin and then say that she “flirted” with an ED but then realized she needed to model healthy habits for her children and then talk about how it made her sympathetic to people who struggle with far worse food issues.

Ugh. I might actually feel bad now if she makes herself sick.

by Anonymousreply 488May 28, 2022 2:13 PM

Valerie Cherish from The Comeback has been mentioned. What if throughout the filming process, they crew all pretend to listen to Meghan when she flags footage or says time out, only to find that the editors have created a scathing show making her come even worse than she is in real life. I think the real question is does Meghan have approval of the final cut? If yes, than the show will be boring as hell. If not, it could be fun. As such a control freak, I can't see Meghan giving that up. On the flip side, Meghan will do anything for money, and her popularity was much higher when she did those deals immediately after Megxit. She went through an invisibility phase until Oprah.

by Anonymousreply 489May 28, 2022 2:29 PM

Harry didn't go to Texas with. Meghan because he "didn't feel the time was right" but his wife decided she "must go out there and offer her compassion, her sympathy." Host says Harry knows how these things work. (Neil Sean who reports on royal stuff)

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 490May 28, 2022 2:31 PM

According to Tina Brown's book, Harry is extremely paranoid about his children and his line in the sand with Meghan is that he doesn't want the kids out there for public consumption. I think left to Meghan, she would have been negotiating the cover of People for a million dollar pay day in utero if it were up to her, as many celebs do - they sell the exclusive rights before giving birth. Maybe (and this is a very loose maybe) Harry feels some kind of empathy with kids and even he felt this was a cheap tactic. Whatever his reason, I am glad he didn't go and gave Meghan, intentionally or not, the rope to hang herself which is classic Windsor move.

by Anonymousreply 491May 28, 2022 2:37 PM

[quote]She probably would have spent a week there digging graves etc if he hadn’t rudely pushed her out.

So LOL. Can you imagine? LOL.

by Anonymousreply 492May 28, 2022 2:45 PM

[quote]A bout of anorexia might make her sympathetic.

I don't know anything about anorexic related weight loss but I do know they get extremely thin. This requires a quick fix. Wouldn't it take a lot of time to reach that point?

by Anonymousreply 493May 28, 2022 2:46 PM

R466, I can’t get over the fact that she wore a dress to a picnic, but showed up at a memorial for murder victims in a tee shirt, jeans and a ball cap.

by Anonymousreply 494May 28, 2022 2:57 PM

They pull stunts that try to come off as royal but instead are always cheap, tawdry, immature, classless and cartoonish.

by Anonymousreply 495May 28, 2022 3:37 PM

Since Lady C's latest video, describing the planned visit of Mr. Marple and the positive activities involved, has been mentioned above, here is the link to that video.

She talks at the beginning about plans made for the visit.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 496May 28, 2022 4:01 PM

^^Ugh why? She is a ghoul.

by Anonymousreply 497May 28, 2022 5:11 PM

Anyone else have Mrs Spongebob Back Fats photo from R466? Its been removed :(

by Anonymousreply 498May 28, 2022 7:01 PM

Another unfortunate pic of our dear fatass Duchess scrubbed from the internet.

by Anonymousreply 499May 28, 2022 7:05 PM

Don't be so hard on Tom Junioress. Genes are genes.

by Anonymousreply 500May 28, 2022 7:11 PM

She a broad shouldered gal

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 501May 28, 2022 7:13 PM

Doesn't California regulate billboards?

by Anonymousreply 502May 28, 2022 7:14 PM

Come to daddy!

by Anonymousreply 503May 28, 2022 7:14 PM

Who lives in a Montecito mansion by the sea??(SPONGEBOB BACK FAT!!)

Shallow and vain and narcissistic is she... (SPONGEBOB BACK FAT!!)

If using dead kids for sympathy be something you wish... (SPONGEBOB BACK FAT!!)

Then hop on that plane with your cunt smelling like fish... (SPONGEBOB BACK FAT!!)

by Anonymousreply 504May 28, 2022 7:14 PM

I love you, R501.

by Anonymousreply 505May 28, 2022 7:24 PM

She didn't look that fat during her visit to Texas. Stress eating?

by Anonymousreply 506May 28, 2022 7:27 PM

Is that the photo at R501? If so I am screaming because there is no way another woman posts a photo that unflattering by accident. Has Meghan been stupid enough to piss Nacho's wife off?

R506 she's wide. You need to catch her the way she's been caught at R501 - straight-on shot from the front or back. Sideways she looks much better. She really is built like a board. The shots from the memorial (the ones that got published, anyway) conveniently don't show her from anything but her flattering angles.

by Anonymousreply 507May 28, 2022 7:30 PM

If Haze didn't go with her even he thought the trip was a bad idea and told her so; she will never forgive him - all recorded in the diary kept by Meghz and Doria for the California Divorce, stay tuned.

by Anonymousreply 508May 28, 2022 7:31 PM

Whoa that photo in R501, revenge the dish best served, photoed from the back! How dumb is Rachel? Women can be your best allies in a harsh world. Piss them off & they will help find the wood for the pyre to burn you & your reputation.

by Anonymousreply 509May 28, 2022 7:36 PM

Harry is all tangled up in Meghan and has been from the beginning. But she is no longer the lithe beauty he married and he won't be used to sleeping with women with less than perfect bodies. Part of me does wonder how long it will be before a comely young lady (and he must run into a few) appears who seems to understand him and his pain in a way Meghan just doesn't anymore.

by Anonymousreply 510May 28, 2022 7:43 PM

Will you marry me, R504?

by Anonymousreply 511May 28, 2022 7:44 PM

Well, as a duke he's entitled to at least one mistress.

by Anonymousreply 512May 28, 2022 7:47 PM

R512, Harry probably has got several side pieces by now. He most certainly does not fuck Spongemegh Squarecunt these days.

by Anonymousreply 513May 28, 2022 8:02 PM

I assume the reason Harry didn't go to Texas is because the only time he went to fucking Cowtown to a run-of-the-mill rodeo was in the hopes he could hook up with Biden who showed up the next day in Fort Worth. Biden didn't make time for him so he couldn't look important.

McConaughey's the only other celeb to show up in Uvalde which he did today. But that's different. It's his hometown.

by Anonymousreply 514May 28, 2022 8:03 PM

"I'm good enough, I'm smart enough, and doggone it people like me!”

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 515May 28, 2022 8:37 PM

Balding Harry has made it very clear he's a mental midget with money problems and a crazy wife- I don't think grade A gold diggers are making a beeline for him.

by Anonymousreply 516May 28, 2022 8:50 PM

[quote]Not even Wallis behaved like this.

No, she didn't.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 517May 28, 2022 9:18 PM

What's the position called when you go in from behind? I want to say confronting your failures but not sure my memory is right on that one.

by Anonymousreply 518May 28, 2022 9:41 PM

Here’s a version of the photo which shows more of the IG page and captions, hashtags.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 519May 28, 2022 9:43 PM

^Youch! Megs will be moving heaven & earth to have tha one scrubbed forever!!

by Anonymousreply 520May 28, 2022 9:47 PM

Her back is even wider than her ass. Thomasina, you need to get working on "but she's so much fun and so caring!" stat.

by Anonymousreply 521May 28, 2022 9:49 PM

R520 Delfina has taken it down from her Insta. I wonder if she got a call?

by Anonymousreply 522May 28, 2022 9:51 PM

It was posted on her Instagram stories. Those posts stay up for a limited period of time.

by Anonymousreply 523May 28, 2022 9:58 PM

Is that the young Potato Head child on the right? He too has Tom Markle's back.

by Anonymousreply 524May 28, 2022 9:59 PM

Harry's not draped all over. Isn't he Madly in love with her, completely enchanted. Seems like he is avoiding her in that shot. maybehe got a real glimpse from the back. Are those bulges near the top on each side the all too familiar fat of deback?

by Anonymousreply 525May 28, 2022 10:04 PM

If that kid is Archie R524, it's obvious he's not the redhead La Markle likes to depict him in their official pics like the Christmas Card one presenting the golden child (Lilibet, that is) to the world.

by Anonymousreply 526May 28, 2022 10:07 PM

I'll bet Duchess Doofus is on an at-home IV Diazepam drip today.

by Anonymousreply 527May 28, 2022 10:11 PM

She looks awful. But he looks like every barely employed, balding, cargo shorts wearing trust fund California douchebag I grew up with. Not special, not aristocratic, not particularly British.

What a fall for him.

Now, she would never be a Santa Barbara housewife elite without him, so she is still "winning".

by Anonymousreply 528May 28, 2022 10:11 PM

Fake tan, or not?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 529May 28, 2022 10:13 PM

Pretty obviously bronzer or fake tan.

by Anonymousreply 530May 28, 2022 10:16 PM

Harry has an identical legs spread pose, just waiting for his wifey to return with further instructions. This is not a signal that he wants a divorce. And how frautastic to believe Markle is "our" Meghan.

by Anonymousreply 531May 28, 2022 10:16 PM

She's been wearing a lot of hats lately.

by Anonymousreply 532May 28, 2022 10:22 PM

And?

by Anonymousreply 533May 28, 2022 10:24 PM

She might have lost hair. Hair often gets more voluminous during pregnancy, only to fall out a while after giving birth due to the gradual drop in pregnancy hormones.

If she has another kid, she'll end up looking like Harry aka Friar Tuck.

by Anonymousreply 534May 28, 2022 10:28 PM

And . . .

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 535May 28, 2022 10:29 PM

She might have lost hair? How does that matter when she wears wigs 95% of the time?

by Anonymousreply 536May 28, 2022 10:31 PM

I’ve been reading Delfina’s backstory - absolutely no surprise if there’s no love lost between her and Meghan.

Daughter of one of Argentina’s richest men, gold medal winning high jumper, model, designer and married to Nacho. Four children, the youngest of whom was elbowed aside on the pretend winners’ dais by you-know-who.

by Anonymousreply 537May 28, 2022 10:35 PM

So La Markle sold interviews to Buzzfeed, People AND OK mag? Oh, dear, property taxes must be due.

by Anonymousreply 538May 28, 2022 10:59 PM

I think payments run in the opposite direction.

by Anonymousreply 539May 28, 2022 11:38 PM

LOL, R536, fair point.

by Anonymousreply 540May 28, 2022 11:40 PM

Can they not afford shoes? They both look like idiots running about barefoot.

by Anonymousreply 541May 28, 2022 11:56 PM

R31 What if some Netflix producer came up with the idea? It doesn't make it any less horribke though. I would like to have been a fly on the wall at the conversation between Meghan and Netflix about the shooting and how to spin it. They have no shame.

by Anonymousreply 542May 29, 2022 12:23 AM

She probably got the idea after the Buffalo shooting that it would be a great idea for her to descend on some mass shootings like Mother Theresa and she luckily for her didn't have to wait too long.

by Anonymousreply 543May 29, 2022 12:32 AM

Bringing in sandwiches and chips for a day seems like such an odd gesture. Why not pay for funerals? Grief counselors? It's like she picked the shallowest option available.

by Anonymousreply 544May 29, 2022 1:07 AM

Paying for funerals would have given her fantastic press, but we all know they wouldn't spend a penny, even for dead kids.

The flowers probably cost $10 max.

by Anonymousreply 545May 29, 2022 1:10 AM

SS working overtime. Two exclusive stories from the Sussex camp. One quote is about how William admires Meghan because he sees that she's such a great mom. At least make it believable, assholes.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 546May 29, 2022 1:15 AM

R544, she seems like an alien who is trying to pass as an Earthling. There’s something that “off” about her. The clothes are usually inappropriate, the gestures (like the bags of Doritos) seem pointlessly demeaning. I think that’s what gets under people’s skin. She’s just so strange—but why?

by Anonymousreply 547May 29, 2022 1:15 AM

Perfectly saud, R547. The answer is: because she's a narcissist and they lack human empathy which makes normal people understand how others tick. She views other people and their stories as opportunities, not as real human beings with feelings (feelings she is incapable of).

by Anonymousreply 548May 29, 2022 1:22 AM

Eh, if she was really raised in Hollywood, with a below the line dad and a makeup artist mom, she really would only know the world as using people to make you look good and as stepping stones for the next big break. I don't blame her for that. It's a soulless, desperate town.

by Anonymousreply 549May 29, 2022 1:58 AM

R549 she must have been desperate to be Somebody in Hollywood as her parents were nonentities. And then her career went nowhere. Marrying Harry and getting famous must have been the best revenge. Probably why she headed straight back to LA, thinking she would finally have the A list career she'd hungered for, for years. But no Hollywood bigwigs seem interested. She strictly hangs around with TV people.

by Anonymousreply 550May 29, 2022 2:06 AM

She imagined actually delivering the food somewhere - yeah, blood drive, that's fine.

How do you make a big show of delivering a donation for funerals? Create one of those four-feet by 2-feet checks? The crates - remember they were CRATES! - well, you can make a big show of doing that, and get some selfies with some of the little people.

by Anonymousreply 551May 29, 2022 2:23 AM

Johnny, Elon - don't you even think about it!

by Anonymousreply 552May 29, 2022 2:27 AM

I truly believe megcunt would take selfies with the dead.

by Anonymousreply 553May 29, 2022 2:29 AM

This was her trump holding bible moment. Last week was her Four Seasons presser moment with the tractor stage and trophy.

by Anonymousreply 554May 29, 2022 3:08 AM

People are going on to the wax Meghan Markle and slapping her at the Madame Tussaud's wax museum in London.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 555May 29, 2022 3:38 AM

Ugh. Harry has become so gross. He used to wear nice suits and now he cant even wear a jacket that fits his stomach. At the Diana statue unveiling he kept tugging at his open blazer and giggling.

Now he dresses like literally every other ginger I've met: white tees, long sloppy looking cargo shorts, messy hair, doesnt shave the back of his neck or his beard cleanly. Man boobs. Plus all gingers smell like sour milk. I can guarantee his ass isnt shaved either.

by Anonymousreply 556May 29, 2022 5:04 AM

What a weird shape. I think she's wearing black underwear underneath that Ralph Lauren knockoff.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 557May 29, 2022 5:17 AM

R526 I noticed the same. I think it’s very possible he’s not the red head depicted on that card. Remember when we saw the back of his head while he was with the chickens? His hair was dark with maybe some auburn in there.

by Anonymousreply 558May 29, 2022 5:32 AM

Found the dress.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 559May 29, 2022 5:36 AM

Hmm, looks like maybe a three-masted schooner and a junk-rig.

by Anonymousreply 560May 29, 2022 5:38 AM

Well, as long as she's comfortable, right?

by Anonymousreply 561May 29, 2022 5:40 AM

Christ she really is built like a tank. My uncle was a cattle farmer and I remember him telling me that he could tell if a cow had given birth just by looking at it. Apparently after the first pregnancy most cows get "sprung" (i.e. permanently widened) ribs. I swear to fuck it was pregnancies that did this to Meg. Her torso is so short of room to grow it's like the ribs expanded and now can't go back down or something.

Unfortunately for her she has one of those figures that only looks attractive at a weight that would be absolutely fucking punishing to maintain. She lost almost all of it after Archie, maybe she'll manage it this time as well?

by Anonymousreply 562May 29, 2022 7:56 AM

The dress has sinking ships haha...

by Anonymousreply 563May 29, 2022 8:10 AM

Markle is even more of an asshole than we ever imagined.

by Anonymousreply 564May 29, 2022 8:30 AM

At the end of this video her entire crew can be seen leaving with her.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 565May 29, 2022 8:36 AM

Markle's parents were not "below the line." Her father was a respected lighting guy in the biz who won Emmy awards, so of course she's jealous and hates him. Mommy, who was not a make-up artist, abandoned the family for a hippie cult, but she's black so sometimes useful to trot out.

by Anonymousreply 566May 29, 2022 11:08 AM

What do you think below the line means?

by Anonymousreply 567May 29, 2022 12:11 PM

In the chicken coop photo Archie's natural hair colour looked chestnut brown and kinda wavy. If that is him (with a nanny?) in the above photo it looks much darker and super curly. Hope they got glasses on him to fix the lazy eye before it becomes permanent. Poor kid.

by Anonymousreply 568May 29, 2022 1:45 PM

But the children, what color will they be?

by Anonymousreply 569May 29, 2022 1:50 PM

It's not clear to me if Meghan brought a film crew and photographers on this trip or if some were just chasing after her. Either way this was not a good look and was certainly a PR effort to clean up her image which backfired. Just after this event someone spoke to the Mirror about Meghan reaching out to her father and that William thinks she's a good mother. This smells of desperation. My advice is to her is to lay low and out of sight. Oh, by the way isn't The Mirror one of the tabloids she sued or boycotted?

by Anonymousreply 570May 29, 2022 4:11 PM

I posted somewhere above that I gave her the benefit of the doubt with this. Now, I'm not so sure after reading this, especially when the columnist compares Meghan's visit to her sister's-in-law visit to the memorial to Sarah Everard. The column also mentions a rather chummy relationship between the Sussexes and People Magazine

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 571May 29, 2022 7:09 PM

Yepppppp......

The Sussexes have quite the track record when it comes to ostensibly private moments finding their way into the public realm. In August 2020 they volunteered at a Baby2Baby event in Los Angeles, handing out back-to-school supplies, and took their own photographer to capture them helping out.

Then in November that same year they staged their own DIY Remembrance Day service by laying flowers on two Commonwealth War graves in Los Angeles with a professional snapper in tow.

by Anonymousreply 572May 29, 2022 7:13 PM

The Meg apologists comparing it to the visit by Kate to Sarah Everard's memorial always ignore the fact that this was attended by thousands of women from across London, of which Kate is one. She didn't take a 2k mile round trip to a strange place to intrude.

by Anonymousreply 573May 29, 2022 7:21 PM

She’s gone so far off the deep end at this point that I half expect her to ride in an open carriage through Montecito with the expectation of adoring crowds.

by Anonymousreply 574May 29, 2022 7:22 PM

Markle had her fluffer from BuzzFeed with her, gave out pics and quotes to People and sold the pics to OK mag. In the venal reality TV celeb stakes, Markle's on top! She's absolutely amoral. Odd thing is the fact the world's media has been camped out for days in Uvalde. You would think CNN or MSNBC would try to get an interview with her. Nope. They saw through her publicity stunt too.

by Anonymousreply 575May 29, 2022 7:23 PM

[quote] She didn't take a 2k mile round trip to a strange place to intrude.

The round trip is more like 3k miles.

by Anonymousreply 576May 29, 2022 7:31 PM

She had that Turkish bloke with her, the one with the greyish beard. He has been with her for a while now, also taking pics of her and Harry at the Invictus games.

by Anonymousreply 577May 29, 2022 7:33 PM

Carbon footprint...

by Anonymousreply 578May 29, 2022 7:34 PM

There were many cameras at the memorial. Meghan knew they would be there. 100% she knew. She cannot NOT have known. Her team knew. She knew there would be photos and footage of herself at the memorial, looking concerned in HD, biting her lip in sadness, walking up and down beside the crosses.

It doesn't matter who those cameras belonged to (although I will NOT be surprised if we get proof some of them were there with Meghan's "crew"). What matters is that they were there, that everyone including Meghan knew they would be there, and that within hours of touching down the images and footage were all over the media, including fawning and highly massaged coverage in People and Buzzfeed News.

BonniePrince you must not be following this too closely (I commend you), because the "cozy" relationship with People is long term and well known.

by Anonymousreply 579May 29, 2022 7:36 PM

R579 is exactly right. But the fact that no other media actually USED their footage of her tells me that she had her own photographic resources and then directed the shots where she knew they would be published - to Buzzfeed and People. I doubt these two publications foraged for visuals among the journos present in Uvalde.

by Anonymousreply 580May 29, 2022 7:47 PM

I wonder how Harry interprets the last couple of years. Almost every incident in the last few years has vindicated his brother and his family. But I’m sure that’s not a permissible thought. I wonder how he acknowledges what a curse she has been on his life while maintaining his animosity towards family.

by Anonymousreply 581May 29, 2022 7:47 PM

One way: 114 hours on a push bike. 1424 miles one way.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 582May 29, 2022 7:50 PM

R581. I wonder if Harry is even slightly aware of what a curse he has been to his family.

by Anonymousreply 583May 29, 2022 8:03 PM

R583, he doesn't care as he's a despicable cunt like his wife is.

by Anonymousreply 584May 29, 2022 8:05 PM

^He's fully aware & is gleeful. It was & still is his dimwit goal.

by Anonymousreply 585May 29, 2022 8:06 PM

Every time Markle does some psycho bit of attention whoring, I'm reminded of that video clip of her berating some C list entertainment journalist in Toronto because he wasn't paying attention to her and was looking over her head for somebody more famous to interview.

by Anonymousreply 586May 29, 2022 8:10 PM

OP, better open part deux.

by Anonymousreply 587May 29, 2022 8:14 PM

[quote] Every time Markle does some psycho bit of attention whoring, I'm reminded of that video clip of her berating some C list entertainment journalist in Toronto because he wasn't paying attention to her and was looking over her head for somebody more famous to interview.

Oh my. We MUST see that. Please go fetch it and bring it back for our pleasure. This will be better than the Grand Prix.

by Anonymousreply 588May 29, 2022 10:34 PM

Juicy Smooliet: I was going to buy sandwiches at 2am.

Spongebob Back Fat: I am sympathetic and was just dropping off sandwiches.

Why do all these made up BS stories involve sandwiches??

by Anonymousreply 589May 29, 2022 10:52 PM

How do people like Meghan get fans? Not to mention adoring fans who jump to defend her.

by Anonymousreply 590May 29, 2022 10:56 PM

I figured they're all bots in Sunshine Sucks' troll farm.

by Anonymousreply 591May 29, 2022 10:58 PM

She is so fake. Even in this old clip of her pre-Harry. There is no sense of her being genuinely nice in this interview and even gives the reporter a dirty look at the beginning.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 592May 29, 2022 11:08 PM

I don't see a dirty look, that's her intense, I'm interested look.

by Anonymousreply 593May 29, 2022 11:22 PM

I don't see dirty looks in that video, either. In fact I'm kind of fascinated by the change in demeanor pre-Harry and post-Harry. She is generally in full-on charm offensive mode in the pre-Harry videos (burgers, anyone?), a small time TV actress hustling HARD (no shade for that) but also, even then, not without a touch of awkwardness to her. She just doesn't *quite* pull it off, does she, when she insists she's so happy to be in Ireland and she'll have to come back and oh, Jen Aniston and Colin Farrell were so nice on the Horrible Bosses set? (and how hard must it suck to be as ambitious as she was and have to be answering questions about more famous actors she worked with, rather than herself, in interviews?)

Also mentions in that video that she's in Ireland to receive an honorary award from "Trinity" (College?) - the "Bram Stoker Entertainment Medal." The internet has no info on this Bram Stoker Entertainment Medal (there seem to be Bram Stoker awards for horror fiction writers but that ain't Our Meg), and there is zero chance she has any kind of honourary award from Trinity College and hasn't told everyone about it so I'm assuming this is PR bullshit.

The old footage gets at something I think intrigues people not necessarily about Meghan but about her story. She is a very ordinary person. Pretty, even very pretty back then, but also basic and deeply unexceptional. It's almost a movie plot come to life - utterly average woman meets and marries Prince! - and we're watching it play out. We're watching what REALLY happens when someone like her gets everything they think they want. She is the living, breathing example of 'be careful what you wish for.'

by Anonymousreply 594May 30, 2022 3:17 AM

The Cuntess of Sussex

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 595May 30, 2022 5:38 AM

She is literal violence at R595.

by Anonymousreply 596May 30, 2022 9:24 AM

She's not pretty. Never has been. Her face structure is weird and that nose! *shudders*

by Anonymousreply 597May 30, 2022 11:32 AM

The Guinness video is totally sweet and innocuous!!! She seems fun and unassuming and cute.

... she's actually a great actress.

by Anonymousreply 598May 30, 2022 11:35 AM

LOL @ R595... doesn't that just capture the moment.

by Anonymousreply 599May 30, 2022 11:59 AM

I'll have whatever drugs R598 is on.

by Anonymousreply 600May 30, 2022 1:27 PM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!