John Mulaney trending on Twitter for embracing Dave Chapelle

Can anyone think of a single (famous) comedian who HASN’T embraced him? Maybe Hannah Gadsby?

Hypocrites, all of them.

I think that John's fans wrongly think he is a feminist, LGBTQ+ ally, they can't see he is just another male jerk comedian.

If they're so fucking brave, they should really learn how to take a joke.

He had Chappelle on during his Red Rock show as well. There are rumors that Netflix wanted Chappelle as a surprise guest star for the inevitable Netflix special. The homophobic joke was him picking on some twins in the audience and insinuating they were really a gay couple and not brothers, "not that there's anything wrong with that."

uh oh the cult is angry!

Oh my gods. I’m so sorry this happened. So so sorry.

Dave looks like a monkey that swings from trees in the jungle.

The Trans are so angry, so filled with hate!

What's Mulaney's appeal anyway?

I wouldn't do him.

You aren't a feminist, r2, if you are a gender religionist who believes men can become women and sex being binary is not real science. You are a men's rights activist.

If Transgender women want to be treated like bio women, they better get much thicker skin. These chicks are real China dolls.

The Trans secret is out

Their raisin d’etre

There were homophobic jokes too but, no surprise, everyone on this thread is pretending otherwise.

[quote]most of society wants trans people dead

They're such hyperbolic drama queens 😂

Also, when you have captured all formerly gay rights organizations, all news media, schools, academia, and have the power to get people fired or their books banned because they disagree with you, you are not a powerless minority. You are a tyrant.

R9 I get the feeling that his big fan base were millennial women who thought that he was a " nice guy" . Now I guess he has to rebrand himself after the whole love child thing.

No, we saw your attempt to shift this to "homophobia" when the trans angle wasn't working, r13.

Learn to take a joke, you will be much happier if you aren't constantly projecting hate and fear on random people.

I'm gay R16 and I think I would be much happier if people weren't telling homophobic jokes.

But is anyone seriously surprised that celebrities turn out to be dicks? How many people applauded, hugged and congratulated Smith not 10 minutes after he assaulted Rock?

R15 his appeal has always been that he's handsome and funny. He's gone to rehab, gotten a divorce, and fathered a child out of wedlock. He's still handsome and funny.

I can't forgive Chapelle for claiming that LGBTs are punching down on black comedians for making jokes at the expense of the LGBT Community.

Everyone knows comedians have personas, it's just that his was really extreme. I also saw a lot of people say they were disappointed in him lying about the whole thing, lots of comments from people saying he should have just kept quiet instead of trying to lie his way out of it.

R17 I'm gay too, and I don't think those jokes were "homophobic".

We are not "trans people", fainting at the sight of being misgendered. We don't need special treatment. All gay people have wanted is to be treated like everyone else.

R19 there is no "LGBT" community. There is the trans community and then there are LGB, who are together because we have are attracted to the same sex.

R20 perhaps they expected too much from him and that is why they were disappointed. He is who he is.

I sympathize with people who went to a Mulaney show expecting his act and instead getting Chappelle's act, which they weren't expecting. It's a totally different kind of standup routine. It would be like going to a Brian Regan show in the early 1990s and suddenly having Andrew Dice Clay show up.

There is a very strong correlation between trans identity and a deranged, perverse kind of survivor’s guilt. I don’t think survivor’s guilt is even the right word because they want to project survivor’s guilt onto other people, constantly. “Acknowledge me, or I will kill myself.” I haven’t seen anything like this before and can’t really articulate and explain it. I keep thinking back to Joey Soloway announcing that Trans people are going through a holocaust right now while protesting at Netflix. “I am Trans, and everyone wants me dead. I suffer more than you. Protect Trans kids (by give them puberty blockers and hormones).” It’s the darndest thing.

R20 True. I do appreciate comedians have personas but this isn't pro-wrestling. People look to comedians for a good time, not storylines and controversy.

R21. I would agree that the twin one isn't homophobic per say, though I feel it's kind of a gay thing to point it out and laugh about it. When straight people do it I'm not so keen. Still hilarious though, even if the twins in question were probably confused.

But didn't he once joke that he was jealous of gays because apparently we have it so much better than black people? Not that funny in my opinion.

R10 "if you are a gender religionist who believes men can become women and sex being binary is not real science"

What is your native language? Just curious

The drama queen in OP's link seems a bit delicate. Really, Chappelle just told "joke after joke" about trans people and he was FORCED to sit there and take it? Convenient that he couldn't film or say what the jokes actually were.

We all know the definition of transphobic includes "anything I don't like". It's been used so much it has lost all coherent meaning.

Present a recording of the jokes, or fuck off.

English, r26. Do you speak it?

[quote]per say

"per se"

Sorry R29, you're right. It's too early in the morning.

You know as well as anyone R27 that filming comedy acts is a big no-no. Can't you be sued for that?

R18 Sadly he's much less handsome now that he's not cocaine thin.

R25 yes, he joked about it. You aren't required to like all of a comedian's jokes.

No one has a recording because the phones are locked up before the act starts, because this is a Netflix tour and it's being filmed for a Netflix special.

R13 Because we can take a fucking joke.

R30 I mention this because he said he WOULD have filmed it to blast Chappelle but he couldn't because they made him lock his phone up. (Yes, r33, I read the tweets where he specifically says this). He did not, however, go on to explain any of the jokes Chappelle said or WHY they were transphobic, and I find it very hard to believe that Chappelle's entire set was about trans people, but the person presented it as if it were.

Either tell us exactly what happened or don't, but I'm not going to take someone who says the very hyperbolic "most people want trans people dead" at their word that something is or is not "transphobic".

Personally, I didn't care for Chappelle saying he was going to do gay jokes because gays "punch down" on people like Kevin Hart, and that's unfair to Kevin. It makes all his subsequent gay jokes sound like revenge for what we supposedly did to poor Kevin Hart.

You don't sound like you can take a joke.

[quote] [R19] there is no "LGBT" community.

r21 is a truth and facts denying Q-Anon loon.

[quote] The LGBT community (also known as the LGBTQ+ community, GLBT community, or the gay community) is a loosely defined grouping of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and other queer individuals united by a common culture and social movements. These communities generally celebrate pride, diversity, individuality, and sexuality. LGBT activists and sociologists see LGBT community-building as a counterweight to heterosexism, homophobia, biphobia, transphobia, sexualism, and conformist pressures that exist in the larger society. The term pride or sometimes gay pride expresses the LGBT community's identity and collective strength; pride parades provide both a prime example of the use and a demonstration of the general meaning of the term. The LGBT community is diverse in political affiliation. Not all people who are lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender consider themselves part of the LGBT community.

Dave Chapelle @ John Mulaney OH thread: gonna shoot this off into the great ethereal since i was at the John Mulaney show tonight:

-Yes, Chapelle was there.

-He made one transphobic joke, the joke was one line after one line of setup and it went as followed:

“I mean, it wasn’t a gun, it was a knife! A gun that identifies as a knife?” He then paused, smiled a bit, and moved on quickly.

- The homophobic joke was him saying “maybe you two are gay, I don’t know, nothing wrong with that if that’s the It was laughed at as he was talking about two twins and he was heckling them a bit about not really being twins, I’d say to call it homophobic was a bit of a stretch.

- John Mulaney hugged Chapelle, it likely was a formality thing. Doesn’t indicate his “stance” or anything.

R36. True. Honestly, why does he continue to make jokes about gays/trans or whatever?

Even if the criticisms are unfair it feels like he's just doing it to spite people. Just ignore them. Surely there are lots of other things he could joke about.

R38 thanks for the link to Wikipedia and the pointless ad hominem attack.

I notice how you did not refute what I said - trans are their own community of people who aren't happy with their sex, and gay people are together because we have something in common, sexual attraction. There is no "LGBT" community, and T should never have been added to the acronym.

R39 yeah, that is not transphobic. Nor is it homophobic.

What happened to the "joke after joke" about trans people that delicate flower in the OP was so exhausted over? I'd been led to believe his entire set was about trans people.

Well, then you'll just have to get in a time machine and go back to the late 1960s when trans people were involved in gay pride events and parades, r41, and stomp your widdle feet and scream that they're not allowed to be in the club.

[quote] I think that John's fans wrongly think he is a feminist, LGBTQ+ ally, they can't see he is just another male jerk comedian.

That’s what I can’t understand, why would they even think this? It’s just white male privilige, isn’t it? People simply project positive qualities on attractive white men?

My impression of Mulaney has always been of a deeply troubled and likely closeted man burdened with some kind of trauma (I assume altarboy) with a strong misogynistic undertone.

How does one "punch down" at a rich successful celeb? What a clueless homophobic clod.

R4 quoted a guy who was there, and that guy was all over Twitter defending Mulaney and Chappelle, and even HIS version of the joke sounds like a lame homophobic childish jab, so I'd love to know what was really said. Sounds like Chappelle is still trying to claim his assailant was an angry tranny, and apparently we discovered that when Chappelle sees twin brothers, he assumes they're having the gay sex where the brother goes up into the brother.

If that's your comedic cup of tea, fine, but let's not pretend like Chappelle isn't doing most of his routine out of spite these days.

[quote] True. Honestly, why does he continue to make jokes about gays/trans or whatever? Even if the criticisms are unfair it feels like he's just doing it to spite people. Just ignore them. Surely there are lots of other things he could joke about

For the same reason that Chris Rock beats the Jada Pinkett Smith dead horse into the ground.

Because it gets a reaction.

[quote]Chappelle's entire set

He didn't do a whole set, he did a few minutes as an opener.

Genius r43. You should learn about gay history before you try to weaponize it.

T was not added to the acronym until around 1998.

The transexuals of 1973 are not the "trans" of today, who literally believe they cease becoming the sex they are when they decide they aren't, entirely in their heads, and who need drugs and surgery or they threaten to kill themselves.

The trans of 1973 would have beaten up the trans of today for being such adolescent whinebags.

I also think much of the anger at Dave Chappelle comes because he is a dark-skinned black men making fun of other people, which society doesn’t accept because it still wants black men on the lowest runs of the totem pole. And the Trans mob is almost entirely white.

That’s why all these Trans people on Twitter are soooo disappointed by Mulaney. Because he’s very white and they expect him to be their natural ally based on whiteness.

R49 I'm with you on all counts, except for your use of the word "literally." You must know that detracts from your otherwise informed post.

“I am constantly under attack and others must be censored.” - The American far right, and Transgender people

R46 really, you got from the single trans joke (reported in r39) that he was trying to claim his assailant was an angry tranny? He was making a joke about the knife because it was a fake gun with a knife attached, that is, a gun that thinks it's a knife. It's actually a good point, despite the "one joke" crowd getting their men-sized women's panties twisted over it.

R10 has fuck all clue about Men's Right's Activism lol

Hate MRA's if you wish but hate them for correct reasons lol

[quote] T was not added to the acronym until around 1998.

I didn't say it was. I said nothing about the acronym. We were not talking about the acronym. You're bringing up the acronym as a strawman argument because you have no real counter to what I said.

[quote]The transexuals of 1973 are not the "trans" of today

This is also a strawman argument, trying to claim that trans didn't even exist back then. Besides, you can't even spell "transsexual" so just shut the fuck up.

Why don't you at least stay on topic and just post over and over again that you love Dave Chappelle because he hates the trannies just like you do?

R52 unfortunately also the American far left. The horseshoe theory is real.

R53, if you're too stupid to realize that this

[quote]“I mean, it wasn’t a gun, it was a knife! A gun that identifies as a knife?” He then paused, smiled a bit, and moved on quickly.

was making a reference to trans, then I can't help you.

[quote] I notice how you did not refute what I said - trans are their own community of people ...

Gays have their Gay Community, Lesbians have their Lesbian Community, and the Bisexuals have their Bisexual Community. Being part of the LGBT Community doesn't take that away.

who aren't happy with their sex, and gay people are together because we have something in common, sexual attraction. There is no "LGBT" community, and T should never have been added to the acronym.

The LGBT Community is a civil rights movement which, after the conservative push for Don't Say Gay bills nationwide, is important to note in recent years. It is not a group based on sexual attraction alone.

[quote] [bold] LGBT activists and sociologists see LGBT community-building as a counterweight to heterosexism, homophobia, biphobia, transphobia, sexualism, and conformist pressures that exist in the larger society. [/bold]

Of course, you can choose to identify only as a member of the Gay Community (or LGB) but ...

[quote] [[R19]] there is no "LGBT" community

is plain, stupid right wing trolling.

R55 You're the one who keeps pulling the thread off topic because you were so offended at me stating that there is no LGBT community, because we have no common ground. Get over it, dear.

You're also now claiming I said "trans didn't exist back then" when I said no such thing. I said the trans of today are NOT the transexuals of 1973, which is true. Trans today are not the same thing. Hell, they now say you don't even need gender dysphoria to be trans now. All you need to do is say you are trans.

Modern trans is a modern invention and it's made by hijacking the gay rights movement, which now exists to serve trans.

Sorry, did a bit of a formatting error.

[quote] I notice how you did not refute what I said - trans are their own community of people ...

Gays have their Gay Community, Lesbians have their Lesbian Community, and the Bisexuals have their Bisexual Community. Being part of the LGBT Community doesn't take that away.

[quote] who aren't happy with their sex, and gay people are together because we have something in common, sexual attraction. There is no "LGBT" community, and T should never have been added to the acronym.

The LGBT Community is a civil rights movement which, after the conservative push for Don't Say Gay bills nationwide, is important to note in recent years. It is not a group based on sexual attraction alone.

[quote] [bold] LGBT activists and sociologists see LGBT community-building as a counterweight to heterosexism, homophobia, biphobia, transphobia, sexualism, and conformist pressures that exist in the larger society. [/bold]

Of course, you can choose to identify only as a member of the Gay Community (or LGB) but ...

[quote] [[[R19]]] there is no "LGBT" community

is plain, stupid right wing trolling.

The biggest clue that the anti-trans trolls are just divide-and-conquer trolls is their insistence that there is no LGBT community.

R58/r59 I'm not right wing, despite your attempts to claim I am because you don't like what I said.

The only thing that binds LGB together is that we are same-sex attracted.

It'd be great if we still had gay rights organizations to push back against any anti-gay legislation. But what we have are organizations that now serve trans overwhelmingly - and seemingly switched overnight once gays got the right to marry - yet still continue to use gay men and lesbians as a shield to hide behind (the "Don't say gay" bills also mention gender identity, but you rarely hear that. Ever wonder why?)

No, statements like yours are what divide us.

LGB are same sex attracted. Trans aren't. We are not the same and never should have been brought together.

You know what's funny? The Anti Trans troll being all up in arms about trans and pronouns and yet feels the need to establish his preference of using the term LGB and people better honor his preference, or else. He can't humor others, but he sure as hell expects to be not just humored but respected for his self proclaimed bravery.

R57 oh my god. It is of course making a joke about trans.

What it is not is calling the attacker trans, like you said.

What it is not, is transphobic.

It is making a joke about a gun that thinks it's a knife or vice versa.

You are either purposely being dense or you actually lack brain cells to understand what I clearly said

It takes a special kind of asshole to match attack with a deadly weapon with an anti-trans joke. Making light of being attacked by dragging trans into it? Yeah, sooooo funny *rolling eyes*

LGB = The new "stunning and brave".

R64 I'm not anti-trans, despite your labeling anyone who disagrees with you as such, but nice try.

Secondly, all I said was there was no LGBT community, and I stated why. This sparked the entire thread being derailed because low-information idiots such as yourself can't BEAR to have someone say such things.

You are the ones trying to convince me that I'm wrong. You could simply have ignored the statement. But you have taken over the thread, slinging ad hominem attacks, ignoring what I said about WHY the two communities are different, and you continue to stamp your feet and either seek to bully me off the thread, or shut me up because you don't like the idea.

Who is the troll here? It ain't me.

It also takes a special kind of asshole to equate a Netflix comedy special with the HOLOCAUST

but that is where the Trans are right now.

Omg, unclench and get a sense of humor, R66. Remove that giant stick up your ass.

R66 it was an obvious joke because it was a fake gun that had a large knife attached to it. It wasn't transphobic because trans people don't like their sex and want to live as the opposite sex. They are very much guns with knifes attached to them.

[quote] Secondly, all I said was there was no LGBT community, and I stated why.

And you are proven wrong. The LGBT Community exists. That is a fact. It's a civil rights movement and not a group based on sexual attraction only. Denying facts and the truth is what makes you a right wing loon on the level of flat earthers and creationists.

You can choose to identify as a member of the Gay (or LGB) Community, but DENYING the existence of the LGBT Community is what brands you as a right wing loon, because that's what right wing loons do.

R54 hah, I wish I had time or patience to explain it to you dear. If you don't see the resemblances that's a "you" issue.

[quote]his appeal has always been that he's handsome and funny.

You keep using that word handsome. I do not think it means what you think it means.

R73 lol, again with the Wikipedia article and the personal attacks. Great "logic" there, I can see I'm dealing with a big brain.

I'm sorry you disagree. I don't really care that you do.

Directed to r72 ^

[quote] lol, again with the Wikipedia article and the personal attacks. Great "logic" there, I can see I'm dealing with a big brain.

Still ignoring the facts? Such a pity. Such a shame that others consider you an anti-trans / right wing troll. I'm afraid nothing can be done about that, too. Too bad you care 'bout that.

R74 you think Mulaney isn't handsome? Mmmk.

R77 that's nice, dear. Please, keep talking. I'm very interested in your opinion.

If you have some evidence to prove that Wikipedia is wrong about the existence of the LGBT community, then post it. Otherwise, perhaps you should do what others have already suggested and simply shut up.

R80 that's nice dear. Please, keep talking. I'm very interested in your opinion.

I am not anti-trans but it's getting harder and harder to support them. I want adults to be able to live their authentic lives, but I'm tired of the whining and the desperate need to cast themselves as victims all the fucking time.

For a group who has made historic strides in a short amount of time, you would think they would be proud of the progress they've made. I mean, has any other group been able to get sane adults to put their demographic information and grammar preferences in their email signatures. Rachel Levine is a woman, but Rachel Dolezal can't be black.

This group is so powerful that in certain parts of the country if little Will says he's a girl, the next day his dizzy parents have put the kid in a dress, bought him a bunch of Barbies, changed his name to Wilhelmina and put an "I Love My Trans Child" flag on the front lawn. And all the kid said was "I'm a girl" while tomorrow that same kid will say, "I'm a tree."

If they think they're exhausted, how do they think the people who have to listen to their nonsense feel.

R54 Let's not type "lol," dear. We're not 12.

[quote]Can anyone think of a single (famous) comedian who HASN’T embraced him? Maybe Hannah Gadsby?Hypocrites, all of them.

Hannah Gadsby is a comedian?

LOL at the clown throwing wikipedia articles up as if they prove anything. Typical dumb translunatic.

Hannah Gadsby is the kind of LGB who fervently scream "Protect Trans kids (by give them puberty blockers and hormones)". Of course why would she embrace him.

Close but no cigar, R64. LGB is based in reality, TQ+ is all make believe crap.

There's a LOT of projection going on in r64.

Got a lil sugar in your tank, mister? Then you are NOT A MAN. You are a NON-BINARY! Now BOW to the ideology of QUEER!

So apparently there are hundreds of trans people that went to this event, according to Twitter. At least, this is judging by all the clout-chasers who are now claiming to have been there, each MORE offended than the last about the endless stream of anti-trans jokes coming from Chappelle's mouth when he threw Mulvaney to the ground and grabbed the microphone from him for an interminable full half-hour of transphobia, while they could do nothing but sit there and inwardly scream in horror due to the violence being committed upon them.

And the endless parade of "Oh my god, I'm so sorry this happened to you." responders.

There were actually over a thousand of trans people there in the audience, but the ones that didn't post on Twitter all hung themselves in the oven this morning due to being denied existence and human rights.

Please, light a candle for them.

One of the comments:

[quote] Mocking the powerful is satire. Mocking the powerless is bullying.

The powerless?! Oh, my sides!

The actual clip from r91.

R92 laws certainly aren't being imemented all over the country to restrict the powerful. That's not how reality works.

r92, right. The trans have so much power, they push for Don't say Gay bills through legislation. Oh, wait. That's right wing conservatives. Well, they get math books canceled. Ups, right wing conservatives again.

They have the power to make people like you believe in complete bullshit, R95, and if you don't believe in it, then you're insulted, ostracized, or worse. They're not some harmless helpless minority. Far from it.

Another great comment from r91:

[quote] Too many people say they should be allowed to say anything they want but rather quickly get bent other shape when anyone say things back.

Power comes from many sources. Capturing the Democratic Party, parts of the news media, educational institutions from graduate schools to elementary schools, mainline progressive religious organizations, the entertainment industry, and Twitter is a major source of power.

You're the one with a head full of bullshit, R96.

R98 utter nonsense.

What can even be done with someone who honestly believes that the trans have "captured" the entire educational system? That's delusion bordering on mental illness.

It is hilarious that the right wing declare itself victim of the all mighty minority of choice (LGBT, black people, women, Muslims, etc.) and then getting laws passed to fuck over minorities and then STILL claims the right wing is just an innocent and blameless victim in all of this.

And entire religions!

/boggle

Prove it, R99.

Oh right, you can't prove it. Because no one can prove a thing the transgender cult claims.

R104, The proof is self-evident. Powerful groups don't allow laws to be passed against them all around the country.

When the right wing whines about the trans and the liberals having way too much power on Twitter, it is them complaining "No fair! WE should have all the power and our opposition should have none!".

R105 prove that trans people have actual power. Otherwise you're just full of shit.

Prove they were born in the wrong body first, R108.

Claiming trsns people are powerful rings some really alarming bells.

[quote] Fascist societies rhetorically cast their enemies as "at the same time too strong and too weak". On the one hand, fascists play up the power of certain disfavored elites to encourage in their followers a sense of grievance and humiliation.

Forcing people to pretend a man is a woman and vice versa also rings some really alarming bells.

Is anyone passing laws to force you to do that? Because Republicans are sure as fuck passing anti-trans laws all-over the place.

To r112, not giving children cancer drugs (Lupron, what r112 has been told is a "puberty blocker") is anti trans. I'll defend gay kids and even oblivious straight kids and most importantly prepubescent CHILDREN from both this dumb gender ideology that reinforces stereotypes, AND from horror drugs.

As usual, a lot of disinformation is being shared by the trolls.

Here's some truth for a change. Not that the anti trans troll cares for that.

^I look forward to WaPo’s retraction in 2029.

Ideological bullshit, R114. Fuck off with your cult.

R114 is the same idiot that posts wikipedia articles as proof. He must be 11.

Says the hate-filled cultist at R116.

huh? since when is biology a cult, R118? I guess I was indoctrinated in middle school.

Whereas you probably didn't pay attention in science class, R118, which explains your belief in Traaaans nonsense.

Your hatred of trans people makes you a cultist.

Constantly posting the same thing over and over, complete with catchphrases like "transtapo" and "translunatic," plus the repeated use of "cultist" and "ideological," does not make you sound convincing or smart. It makes you sound like a stupid person who heard two or three soundbites from some lower-tier hate forum and decided to repeat them because you have no thoughts of your own.

Wikipedia has sources that include NYT, Gale Research, WaPo, Oberlin Review, and the Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, among about 100 others. Pick one of those sources and show us that it's wrong. Just one.

Trans are crazy. Why give them the time of day?

I support Dave 1000%. I’m so sick of this PC bullshit. I don’t even care if comedians start saying faggot again. That would be refreshing. Stop coddling morons.

Anyone who says that biological sex is now a spectrum has totally bought into the gender cult's lies and is useless to argue with. It is their religion, and they will throw up pseudoscience and bullshit to try to justify it when challenged.

No matter how many times the trans activist trolls screech about "right wing! Nazi bigots! Anti-trans!" and try to label anyone who disagrees with them as subhuman, it won't work. They only do it because they know the facts aren't on their side.

The people these white knights are defending are twice as likely to vote Republican than the LGB. That is, the trans themselves are more likely to be right wing, to vote against social justice programs, etc. I wonder if the white knights know they're defending conservatives and those who will vote against their their stated interests?

Funny how that works. No wonder the trans try to cloak themselves in the LGBT/LGBTQIA+ acronym and shriek if any studies with results they don't like focus on the T themselves.

When it's "LGBT" and the trans vote is diluted, the political spectrum is divided, which seems odd. But when you break it out jnto LGB and separate the T, you find that LGB are overwhelmingly voting Democratic, and trans are what were skewing the poll.

I don't give a fuck who they vote for. As DL keeps telling me trans are a tiny tiny TINY percentage of the population, so who cares who they vote for. Besides that, I'm not pro-trans, I'm anti-bigot, that means transphobes, Nazis, homophobes etc.

When you break out the nonbinaries - who are more confused or excessively narcissistic LGB than straight - you find out that the nonbinaries were cloaking the trans conservative political leanings as well. Maybe that's why they try to lump nonbinary under the trans umbrella, too. So that number above shifts from majority Democratic to majority Conservative. That's right - trans themselves vote majority Republican.

(Also note how the author of this study bends over backwards trying to find some way to excuse what the results show - she's afraid of the backlash / in denial herself).

For the trans activist trolls who shriek and call everyone who disagrees with the trans gender orthodoxy Nazis, right-wingers, etc. - this is who you are defending. You're defending right wingers.

R124 they do say that word, except it's all nouveau gays saying it. And they also use it as a perjorative, despite pretending they have "reclaimed" the word. It's overwhelmingly used to identify an undesirable class of gays by these allegedly progressive gays themselves.

No, trans still vote DEM 58%. That doesn't make them right-wingers.

And that's even if those numbers are accurate. Does anyone have a link to that poll?

Hi r131, first of all, they are almost twice as likely to vote Republican than Dem, and also in your haste to deny it you neglected the follow-up tweet in r128 as to what happens when you split out the nonbinaries from the true trans. You might want to slow down and actually think for a minute rather than just defending your religion blindly.

I know you don't WANT it to be true. That does not make it so.

R127 you are a trans supporter. You are defending them. You have bought into the gender religion orthodoxy and think anyone is a bigot transphobe who opposes medicalizing, sterilizing, and performing mastectomies on children.

You sought out this thread so you could attack others, name-call, and feel good about yourself because you think you're defending a "marginalized at-risk population" rather than mostly straight adult men with autogynephila and extreme misogynistic tendencies.

You're not a good person, despite what you might pretend to be in order to give yourself an excuse to let your sadistic side loose.

Oh boy, this one thinks he's Lorne Michaels:

not exaggerating but i dont think John Mulaney would have blown up as much online as a stand up comic if it werent for queer people spreading his jokes around and quoting his shit constantly 10 years ago

in 2013 the only people i knew who quoted john mulaney bits were queer. he was basically a meme

around that time comedians were starting to get some backlash for queer/transphobic jokes and people always pointed to JM for "non offensive humor"

JM was kind of a "safe" comedian to watch as a queer person bc, well he was comparitively and it felt like he understood the humor of the queer community and played to it a lot. so yeah he built his audience

and this is a huge fucking spit in the face to the audience HE built himself.

like hugging someone after they tell a transphobic set? mask off. fuck JM im really upset.

also this is an opinion obviously i dont care if you think its wrong but like. seriously i didnt hear abt him in the mainstream media or anything until memes of him made by gay teenagers on tumblr made it to facebook lmfao

Hi r135 welcome to the thread. You might want to read some of it, ANY of it, before posting more of your illiterate screed.

R133 It still doesn't matter. I'm not pro-trans, so as I said I don't give a fuck who they vote for.

R134 Fuck off with your bullshit.1

R136, thanks for the welcome but I'm fine joining the conversation right at this point.

R136, oh, and I just copied and pasted the illiterate screed at R 135. It was actually written by a pro-trans "queer".

Trannies are not victims. They are in power, they are in control. People need to start “punching up” on them.

[quote]No, trans still vote DEM 58%. That doesn't make them right-wingers.

Link.

Happy Pride(tm)

Remember the old days when we would just watch comedians and were able to just not laugh if we thought something wasn't funny, but it didn't ruin our entire lives?

I keep seeing posts on Twitter who are exaggerating to the extreme (like the OP Twitter post) about Chappelle basically going on a transphobic rant instead of one throwaway joke about a gun identifying as a knife 🗡️

Like they're just in auto-screech at this point.

R144, thanks. I didn't even know what he said after having read a few media reports about it. They don't report it.

[quote]Your hatred of trans people makes you a cultist.

Silliest thing I've read all day. And I read men's room walls.

Mulaney pretty much blew up his "rare unproblematic white guy" image when he knocked up a racist, ableist, fatphobic, misogynist, thirsty, desperate pick me while still married and in rehab, so I'm not sure why any of his fans would be surprised.

R147, yeah, that's why these complainers have no ground to stand on.

The fans believe his story that he broke up with his wife in October, r147. I don't understand that because he was on SNL with her at the end of October, and also talked about living with her in interviews after that. They have to know he's lying. There's no accounting for fans, though.

The cheating is the least of it--no one knows what's really happening in someone else's marriage. But having a mean girl like Munn as your sidepiece just blows any notion that you're a genuinely nice, if troubled, person out of the water.

God, what a fucking Frau thread. John Mulaney is a misogynist because he had relationship problems?

Did you post in the wrong thread, R151? Because no one here said any such thing.

[quote]The second he came on stage, I was scared. By the time he was done, I thought I was going to throw up. My sister actually left and had a breakdown.

MARY. Please.

For those of us who grew up with Eddie Murphy's actually homophobic comedy specials, this is RIDICULOUS.

He didn't scare us or make us have a "breakdown"(?).

R152, more like a SJW thread. They're a very judgmental crowd.

^comment above was for R151

There's nothing about SJWs or misogynists in this thread. Why are you trying to make it sound like there is?

I almost thought you were making that up R153 as a joke post.

R156, read the angry rant of a Mulaney fan who thought he was a "safe" comedian at R135.

So, you imported some Twitter user's rant into the thread and now want us all to rant against it? No thank you.

R159 and yet the viewpoint of these relatively few Twitter users get such wide media coverage.

Those tweets were reported in the news?

That viewpoint was reported in the news, R161.

Mulaney has been holding it together, I have the popcorn ready waiting for his coke/whore binge and dumping the baby mama.

So those weren't the tweets reported in the news? They were, as I said, just random tweets from someone with an opinion? Sorry, I simply do not care. I'm not interested in the people who post tweets on DL and demand I become enraged by them.

R164, the news takes the viewpoints of these morons and reports it like it is a majority view.

It’s not just random tweets from one person. It’s the zeitgeist right now in the trans community. Of course we can’t post all their tweets so have to choose one or two to represent their sentiment.

He's trying to get that Disney $$$ so he better keep his nose clean

trans act like such babies.

All jokes must be scanned for six degrees of potential insensitivity!!!

At this point, I suppose we can only tell knock-knock jokes?

No r169, how ableist. Deaf people would be excluded and told they don't matter.

.,.,