Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Justice Thomas on SCOTUS decisions: People need to "live with outcomes we don’t agree with"

Fat dumb fuck.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 53May 9, 2022 5:49 PM

Listen to this Immortan Joe sounding motherfucker

by Anonymousreply 1May 7, 2022 11:39 PM

Funny, Clarence, you and your fat cunt wife didn't live with an outcome you didn't like, and decided to support an insurrection.

by Anonymousreply 2May 7, 2022 11:41 PM

Do not, my friends, become addicted to justice....

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 3May 7, 2022 11:41 PM

All I can think of is pubic hairs on a Coke bottle when I see his face.

by Anonymousreply 4May 7, 2022 11:42 PM

R2, your observation makes me think it likely that his statement is a dog whistle to the 1/6 insurrectionists - who are also being "forced" to live with an outcome they don't agree with - that this ruling is a form of revenge.

by Anonymousreply 5May 7, 2022 11:44 PM

R5, what are you talking about. He’s on their side. How is this revenge on them?

by Anonymousreply 6May 7, 2022 11:53 PM

Like election results.

by Anonymousreply 7May 7, 2022 11:55 PM

I'm thinking a form of revenge on the "libs"....inflicting Biden on Magats. Petty people....

by Anonymousreply 8May 7, 2022 11:55 PM

R7, like no prayer in public schools, desegregation, abortion, and a myriad of other decisions conservatives didn't like at the time.

On this point, Thomas is right. Our system works because people agree to abide by SCOTUS decisions even if they don't like them.

by Anonymousreply 9May 7, 2022 11:59 PM

His face is pure evil. He always twists the truth to make himself the hero of the story. Socio.

by Anonymousreply 10May 8, 2022 12:00 AM

Kind of like how his whore didn't like the outcome of the election, and supported an insurrection. According to him, she should just learn to live with it. . Fuck him. Fuck her.

by Anonymousreply 11May 8, 2022 12:06 AM

He’s a disgusting pig. Always has been.

by Anonymousreply 12May 8, 2022 12:09 AM

Forgive me…I didn’t know he was making public appearances. This whole time, I’m thinking he’s still in a hospital, hooked up to a ventilator.

by Anonymousreply 13May 8, 2022 12:11 AM

The US can outlaw abortion and join Uganda, The Congo, The Dominican Republic and Egypt, among a few other third world shitbox nations who are the only ones with abortion being illegal. Way to go USA!

by Anonymousreply 14May 8, 2022 12:14 AM

I'm already living with an outcome I didn't like: Clarence Thomas' bullshit about "lynching of uppity blacks" that made a fool out of poor Anita Hill (when we all knew you were lying) and got your useless ass onto the Supreme Court.

by Anonymousreply 15May 8, 2022 12:25 AM

He’s so fucking ugly. Can’t stand seeing his face.

by Anonymousreply 16May 8, 2022 12:29 AM

Clarence Thomas getting past Senate hearings, for those who remember, was an outcome many didn’t like. (He got past the Senate and ended up on SCOTUS.

by Anonymousreply 17May 8, 2022 12:29 AM

I wonder if the Clarence Thomas/Anita Hill thing happened today, would the outcome be the same?

by Anonymousreply 18May 8, 2022 12:32 AM

From today's MoDo column

[quote] Clarence Thomas, another of the justices wanting to turn America into Saudi Arabia. (Saudi Arabia at least allows abortions if the woman’s physical or mental health is at risk.) Thomas — married to the off-the-wall right-wing activist Ginni — got on the court with the help of Republican senators who smeared Anita Hill as a pervy liar when they knew all along that Thomas was the pervy liar. The senators claimed Thomas could not possibly have been talking about porn in the office, as Hill said, [bold]even though they knew from his D.C. video store visits that he was indeed a connoisseur of so-called “freak-of-nature” porn, especially the movies of Bad Mama Jama, a porn star so sadly obese she could barely move.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 19May 8, 2022 12:34 AM

Man, is he absolutely repulsive looking.

by Anonymousreply 20May 8, 2022 12:35 AM

Honey brewski Kavanaugh with gambling debt and rape accusation passed, so yeah, Thomas would have passed.

by Anonymousreply 21May 8, 2022 12:35 AM

like Joe Biden winning the election for President.

by Anonymousreply 22May 8, 2022 12:41 AM

I thought he was on death's doorstep, hooked up to a vent. Someone REALLY should have sent Anita Hill in that hospital room with a nice, extra large pillow.

by Anonymousreply 23May 8, 2022 12:42 AM

He's pissing on our shoes because he knows he and his traitor wife can't be touched.

by Anonymousreply 24May 8, 2022 12:45 AM

Like Dred Scott.

by Anonymousreply 25May 8, 2022 1:02 AM

Didn't there used to be laws against interracial marriage? Let's bring that back.

by Anonymousreply 26May 8, 2022 1:09 AM

Remember when the asshole mainstream media helped Thomas and the rest of the dc elites bully Anita Hill?

by Anonymousreply 27May 8, 2022 1:18 AM

IMO, Anita Hill was a lot more clear on her memories and timelines than Blasey Ford, who couldn't even keep her hair outside of her glasses.

by Anonymousreply 28May 8, 2022 1:23 AM

Clarence Thomas has always been for sale. One of these rich bitches should have bought his vote. You know it's unthinkable that he's never paid for an abortion.

by Anonymousreply 29May 8, 2022 1:34 AM

The radical Catholic US Supreme Court is going to terrorize us for a very long time with decisions we won’t like. Suck it up buttercups says the esteemed Justice.

by Anonymousreply 30May 8, 2022 2:04 AM

Thomas was the leaker. Count on it.

by Anonymousreply 31May 8, 2022 2:13 AM

Dead eyes. Psycho shit cunt.

by Anonymousreply 32May 8, 2022 2:34 AM

[Quote] IMO, Anita Hill was a lot more clear on her memories and timelines than Blasey Ford, who couldn't even keep her hair outside of her glasses.

Ford survived a rape attempt. Give her a break

by Anonymousreply 33May 8, 2022 2:52 AM

What's with his eyes? Does Medusa know?

by Anonymousreply 34May 8, 2022 3:24 AM

He really does have a face that not even a mother would love.

by Anonymousreply 35May 8, 2022 4:03 AM

Fuck him and fuck his nutcase John Bircher wife. Couple of fucking right wing whackos.

by Anonymousreply 36May 8, 2022 4:06 AM

The basis Alito is using to overturn Roe can also be used to repudiate Loving v Virginia. Thomas concurs because he’s a stupid asshole. You’d think a black guy who’s married to a horrific white succubus would think twice before undermining his own house of cards.

by Anonymousreply 37May 8, 2022 4:13 AM

Anita Hill was 100% telling the truth. Thomas never should've been put on the Supreme Court. He is vile, and an absolute moron.

by Anonymousreply 38May 8, 2022 4:28 AM

Unlike his cunting wife. Fucking Uncle Tom

by Anonymousreply 39May 8, 2022 9:47 AM

They should make it illegal for men to get vasectomies.

by Anonymousreply 40May 8, 2022 12:32 PM

No man would go to a picket line for that.

by Anonymousreply 41May 8, 2022 12:33 PM

I hadn't really thought about it as a shout out to the insurrectionists, but yeah, I can see this as a "fuck you" to the current administration, though Clarence's entire career could be described as a "fuck you" to his enemies - real or perceived - rather than any kind of judicial philosophy.

Here's the irony of this: when all those revelations about Ginni came out, apologists like George Will try to make the argument that she doesn't represent his views. Shit like this demonstrates that they are two peas in a pod (or pigs in shit, if you will).

Clarence no doubt fancies himself as some sort of demigod that can inflict his will on the population, but this ruling & his insistence on further kicking the hornets nest they've stirred up is going to enrage the public in ways I don't think they anticipate. And I don't mean vigilante justice against Clarence & she-beast - I mean strengthen the political will to change the face of the court

by Anonymousreply 42May 8, 2022 3:23 PM

We need to add about 10 more justices to the court to dilute the stranglehold of the far right loonies.

by Anonymousreply 43May 8, 2022 3:27 PM

We need to have term limits. This lifetime appointment bullshit was invented in the 18th Century when people were lucky if they even lived to age 60. If the founders could've known how much lifespans would increase, it's likely they never would've made the lifetime appointment rule.

by Anonymousreply 44May 8, 2022 4:26 PM

Another originalist, good luck....

by Anonymousreply 45May 8, 2022 5:14 PM

r45 it makes sense to have term limits

by Anonymousreply 46May 8, 2022 5:16 PM

Guess then if the Supreme Court changes the Constitutional amendment on slavery he should live with it!

by Anonymousreply 47May 8, 2022 5:29 PM

R47, that would be funny if it wasn't pitiful.

The Supreme Court can't change the Constitution or any of its amendments. That would defeat the purpose of the Court: to interpret the Constitution.

by Anonymousreply 48May 9, 2022 12:38 AM

Clarence Thomas is a big part of Bidens legacy. I’m still annoyed with him for insisting he had nothing to apologize to Anita for during the pirimary. He eventually changed his tune and she more or less told him to stuff it.

by Anonymousreply 49May 9, 2022 1:03 AM

Ah, R48, but the original purpose of the Court was decidedly NOT to interpret the Constitution. They gave themselves that power in a famous court case called "Marlbury v. Madison." This power is called "judicial review." Read about it!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 50May 9, 2022 5:32 PM

He means "don't get upset by people who lie and cheat to impose their will on you, take away your rights, and turn the country into an oligarchical theocracy."

What's happening is making me so angry. Stop obsessing on the courts decisions, the corrupt politicians but on the fact that the Republican party is one of totally lying, corrupt, assholes who take pleasure in "owning the libs" and watching "liberals heads explode."

They don't give a fuck about equality, integrity, true democracy, or human rights, they will stop at nothing to impose their cruel idiocy on the majority. They represent a minority, not a country where every vote counts because if they did, their cheating would not have given us W Bush or Trump. Even more normal Republicans look the other way while their stupid elected officials cheat to win. Makes me sick.

by Anonymousreply 51May 9, 2022 5:45 PM

By "cheat to win" the whole Supreme Court debacle while Obama was still in office, directed by the cruel, evil machinations of Satan Mitch McConnell to corrupt the court to represent an evil minority has never truly been addressed. Rush in that Handmaids Tale lady in two weeks, refuse to seat a judge in 10 months, the current Supreme Court is illegitimate. It's a crime.

by Anonymousreply 52May 9, 2022 5:48 PM

They didn't resign themselves to Plessy v Ferguson; they kept working for half a century and overturned it. Not that Brown v School Board can't also be overturned ...

by Anonymousreply 53May 9, 2022 5:49 PM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!