Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

The owner of a South Dakota hotel said she was banning Native people

The Black Hills of South Dakota have been inhabited by Indigenous people for thousands of years, but last month the owner of a hotel in Rapid City, located on the eastern edge of the mountain range, said Native people were no longer welcome.

After a Native American man was arrested in connection to a shooting that took place at the Grand Gateway Hotel on March 19, the owner, Connie Uhre, said on Facebook that she'd be banning Natives altogether from the hotel and the adjoining Cheers Sports Bar.

"We will no longer allow any Native American on property," Uhre wrote in a comment that was shared, and condemned, by the mayor of Rapid City, Steve Allender. Uhre also wrote that ranchers and travelers, presumably non-Native ones, would receive a special rate of $59 a night.

In an email chain obtained by South Dakota Public Broadcasting, Uhre wrote: "The problem is we do not know the nice ones from the bad Natives."'

Local tribal leaders moved quickly, and on March 26 they hit the hotel with a trespassing notice, citing a 1868 US treaty with the Sioux.

"It was shocking, but not too much surprising, because we kind of live with this here in South Dakota," Harold Frazier, chairman of the Cheyenne River Sioux and a signer of the notice, told Insider. "But to really see it so blatantly, it was really concerning."

Uhre and the Grand Gateway Hotel did not respond to Insider's requests for comment. Nick Uhre, Connie's son and the manager of the hotel, also did not respond, but told SDPB he did not support his mother's statements and that "Natives are welcome at the Grand Gateway Hotel, always have been, always will."

Uhre's comment about banning Native people sparked swift and widespread outrage in Rapid City.

NDN Collective, an Indigenous-led organization, filed a lawsuit on March 23 against the Uhres, the hotel, and the Retsel Corporation, which lists Connie Uhre as its president, accusing them of "explicit racial discrimination."

The lawsuit said Sunny Red Bear, who is listed as a plaintiff, and another Native woman tried to rent a room at the Grand Gateway Hotel on March 21, a day or so after Uhre's comments, and were refused. An employee told them that the hotel was not renting rooms to people with "local" identifications, according to the lawsuit.

"As a direct result of Connie Uhre's decision, announced on social media, to exclude Native Americans from her businesses, Ms. Red Bear was discriminated against in violation of federal law," the lawsuit said.

NDN Collective sent its own representatives to the hotel to try to rent rooms on March 22 and they too were denied, according to the lawsuit.

Days after the lawsuit was filed, Sioux leaders hit the hotel with the trespass notice.

"You are hereby notified that the Great Sioux Nation has made an investigation, and evidence shows that you are in trespass," the notice said. Protesters gathered at the hotel the day it was delivered and a large "Eviction Notice" was hung over the hotel sign.

Frazier said that he and other tribal leaders moved quickly because it was important "to get our people protected." The notice was also signed by Crow Creek Sioux chairman, Peter Lengkeek; Oglala Lakota Sioux president, Kevin Killer; Rosebud Sioux president, Scott Herman; and Standing Rock Sioux chairwoman, Janet Alkire.

The notice said the hotel was in violation of the Treaty of Fort Laramie, also called the Sioux Treaty of 1868, which established that the land of the Black Hills belonged to the Sioux. When gold was found in the area a few years later, the US broke the treaty by allowing white settlers to move there, an action the Supreme Court deemed illegal in 1980.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 52April 24, 2022 8:40 PM

The treaty articles cited in the notice state that non-Natives cannot pass through the treaty lands "without the consent of the Indians." It also states "if bad men among the whites" commit any wrongdoing against a Native person they would be reported to the federal government "to be arrested and punished according to the laws of the United States."

Leaders of the Great Sioux Nation consider the treaty valid. Frazier said that there was never an agreement by both parties to dissolve the treaty, so "it's still a legal binding document." He cited Article 6 of the Constitution, which establishes laws and treaties of the US as the supreme law of the land.

US courts have also repeatedly acknowledged the validity of Indian treaties, according to James Meggesto, an attorney who specializes in Native American law and a member of the Onondaga Nation. He cited the 1980 Supreme Court decision on the Black Hills, the Eastern Indian land claims, and, most recently, the 2020 Supreme Court decision in McGirt v. Oklahoma, which held that much of eastern Oklahoma is Native land.

"A treaty is the supreme law of the land whether it was made five years ago or hundreds of years ago," Meggesto said of the courts' reasoning for upholding Indian treaties.

The issue is not a question of whether or not the treaties are valid, but how they can be remedied or enforced. In the case of the hotel being accused of trespassing, it's unlikely the federal government even has a process in place to enforce the treaty, even if it is valid.

Still, Meggesto said "highlighting the treaty is a good way of demonstrating, 'let's not forget this is all Indian land.'"

"We may not have a remedy to eject everybody from the territory guaranteed in those treaties, but there's still an obligation to make sure that the health and welfare of the people there, including people who are the victims of this blatant racial discrimination, are taken care of," he said.

It's unclear what will ultimately happen to the hotel. At the time of writing it was listed as "temporarily closed" on Google and was not accepting any reservations online before May 16. The tribal leaders said they plan to pressure Rapid City to revoke the hotel's business license and that the tribes are considering a boycott of all of Rapid City.

Frazier said they'll continue to explore options, but that it's not the first time Natives have been in this position.

"We've been through it before," he said. "This is just a bump in the road. We just go over that bump and keep moving and stay positive. We can't let this destroy us."

by Anonymousreply 1April 17, 2022 12:43 AM

[quote] The notice said the hotel was in violation of the Treaty of Fort Laramie, also called the Sioux Treaty of 1868, which established that the land of the Black Hills belonged to the Sioux.

The fact that a treaty from 1868 has to be cited for fair treatment in 2022, shows just how backwards this country has become.

by Anonymousreply 2April 17, 2022 12:44 AM

Wow, what a good businesswoman /sarcasm

by Anonymousreply 3April 17, 2022 12:53 AM

They need to start a ban on freeper Karen cunts

by Anonymousreply 4April 17, 2022 12:55 AM

So if a white person kills someone near there will they ban all white people?

by Anonymousreply 5April 17, 2022 12:57 AM

If you don't look like one of the four guys on Mount Rushmore, you ain't staying at her Motel 6.

by Anonymousreply 6April 17, 2022 1:04 AM

#TeamNatives

by Anonymousreply 7April 17, 2022 1:16 AM

Technically it's not the Indians' land either, since they didn't have the concept of land ownership.

R2 what do you think everything is built on? Water use agreements from the 1800s are still causing California trouble in 2022.

by Anonymousreply 8April 17, 2022 1:24 AM

#NativesTeam

by Anonymousreply 9April 17, 2022 1:26 AM

[quote] Native American

First Nations!

by Anonymousreply 10April 17, 2022 1:27 AM

Connie Uhre of Rabid Shitty

by Anonymousreply 11April 17, 2022 1:28 AM

Scalp the bitch.

by Anonymousreply 12April 17, 2022 1:28 AM

Based old woman!

by Anonymousreply 13April 17, 2022 1:30 AM

Which natives owned the land. Many tribes fought over the land enslaving the losers. I live next to a reserve and it is scary. People and politicians take their side no matter what. There isn't room for two owners. Natives must remain on their reserves and live by hunting not welfare

by Anonymousreply 14April 17, 2022 1:31 AM

[quote]So if a white person kills someone near there will they ban all white people?

Of course not. A white person can shoot, stab, rape someone or several and you don't see assholes gather in a thread to talk about how they're all savages. You don't see law enforcement push for surveillance. Even Jan 6th didn't get the reaction from LE that the protests after Floyd was killed did. I saw douchebag US attorneys calling for Trump to use the Insurrection Act for those protests but not a peep out of those same white fascist dickheads to use it when we had an actual insurrection BY Trump.

by Anonymousreply 15April 17, 2022 2:18 AM

Donald Trump unleashed this shit, and now there's no putting it back in the bottle.

Fuck him to HELL!

by Anonymousreply 16April 17, 2022 2:19 AM

Persons supplying service have the right to refuse service.

by Anonymousreply 17April 17, 2022 2:26 AM

[quote] Persons supplying service have the right to refuse service.

And other persons who don't like that refusal, have the right to punch her in her ugly, MAGAT, Deplorable face.

Donald Trump gave us all permission.

by Anonymousreply 18April 17, 2022 2:29 AM

Yes, let's attack an old woman with violence, that will show her!

by Anonymousreply 19April 17, 2022 2:32 AM

[quote] Yes, let's attack an old woman with violence, that will show her!

Live by the sword, die by the sword.

If the old cunt wants to act like a cunt, then she will get what she deserves.

by Anonymousreply 20April 17, 2022 2:39 AM

[quote]Persons supplying service have the right to refuse service.

Oh, really? Then why don't MAGAts fuck off when they're told to wear a mask when they enter a business? They throw a hissy fit about "ma[sic] rights." The same assholes who use that line about refusing service are entitled pricks who think every business is supposed to coddle their spoiled asses.

by Anonymousreply 21April 17, 2022 2:41 AM

Withdrawing service has nothing to do with swords, R20.

by Anonymousreply 22April 17, 2022 2:46 AM

R20 she's not attacking people with swords, she's being racist.

If you honestly think attacking a woman physically is appropriate because she's racist and afraid, well... talk is cheap on the Internet, and it's kinda sad you think that way.

Also note that the "an eye for an eye" shit is old testament nonsense, which was trashed with the new covenant.

by Anonymousreply 23April 17, 2022 2:46 AM

R20 = Rebel Without A Cause.

by Anonymousreply 24April 17, 2022 2:48 AM

South Dakota Republicans have found their next candidate for governor.

by Anonymousreply 25April 17, 2022 2:48 AM

[quote] Donald Trump unleashed this shit

No he didn’t, Mary!

by Anonymousreply 26April 17, 2022 2:49 AM

R8 Comes from a long line of white slave owners. Her people don't consider blacks "human" either. They are considered a mud race.

by Anonymousreply 27April 17, 2022 2:53 AM

R27 Your post is a totally is appropriate and not at all ridiculously hyperbolic and overdramatic response to a fairly tepid, factual comment.

by Anonymousreply 28April 17, 2022 2:55 AM

R15 white criminals are a minority. Most blacks for example have committed violent crime so you avoid them. Native Indians are a lot like blacks. Civilization does not come naturally to all peoples.

by Anonymousreply 29April 17, 2022 8:07 PM

[quote] Native Indians are a lot like blacks. Civilization does not come naturally to all peoples.

If that were true, blacks and natives would be running society today.

But white people are running it because of their brutality towards other races.

They enslaved blacks, treated them like animals, bought and sold them, raped them, killed them, and abused them for centuries.

White people also nearly exterminated natives through murder, rape, theft of their land, and extermination of their language.

Don't ever say that blacks and natives aren't civilized, because white people are literally spawned from the devil, in how they treated other races.

"Civilization does not come naturally," indeed.

by Anonymousreply 30April 17, 2022 8:42 PM

[quote][R15] white criminals are a minority. Most blacks for example have committed violent crime so you avoid them. Native Indians are a lot like blacks. Civilization does not come naturally to all peoples.

God, you're tiresome.

by Anonymousreply 31April 17, 2022 8:45 PM

It only took losing a democratic election for thousands of white people to go feral and attempt to murder elected officials.

It takes literally destroying nations, killing thousands of their people, pillaging and plundering, for those non-white people to get angry, so why don't you go fuck yourself with your white supremacist crap.

by Anonymousreply 32April 17, 2022 8:49 PM

Of all the personality defects, racism is the most exhausting

by Anonymousreply 33April 17, 2022 9:00 PM

[quote] Of all the personality defects, racism is the most exhausting

Racism is the worst sin of the holy Ten Commandments.

by Anonymousreply 34April 17, 2022 9:46 PM

[quote]Persons supplying service have the right to refuse service.

Umm, no.

[quote]42 U.S.C. §2000a (a)All persons shall be entitled to the full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, and accommodations of any place of public accommodation, as defined in this section, without discrimination on the ground of race, color, religion, or national origin.

[quote]42 U.S.C. §2000a(b) Each of the following establishments is a place of public accommodation within this title if its operations affect commerce, or if discrimination or segregation by it is supported by State action: (1) any inn, hotel, motel, or other establishment which provides lodging to transient guests

by Anonymousreply 35April 17, 2022 10:01 PM

Well thats unconstitutional so good luck with that. The Feds are about to shut down her entire business.

by Anonymousreply 36April 17, 2022 10:02 PM

R33 racism is inevitable. It's part of the structure of universe like gravity. We are all racist. It's dangerous to pretend racism can be eliminated. We need to plan immigration ,policing , etc with racism in mind. History shows that race is how humans mainly fragment and fight when resources are scarce.

by Anonymousreply 37April 18, 2022 1:00 AM

You have very low standards, R37.

Not surprising.

by Anonymousreply 38April 18, 2022 3:57 AM

[quote]They enslaved blacks, treated them like animals, bought and sold them, raped them, killed them, and abused them for centuries.

Actually, BLACK Africans and Muslim Arabs enslaved the blacks FIRST before selling them to white Europeans.

by Anonymousreply 39April 18, 2022 4:46 AM

[quote]racism is inevitable.

Because of people like you.

[quote]It's part of the structure of universe like gravity.

Don't use fact-based science to justify one's choice to be hateful and ignorant.

These two little girls are exposed to assholes, that's why they end up changing. If they never encountered most humans, they wouldn't know what hate was:

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 40April 18, 2022 2:51 PM

R40 racism is group dynamics. Individuals of different races can fall in love. Anyway, we must defend our land against the threat

by Anonymousreply 41April 18, 2022 10:21 PM

[quote]Anyway, we must defend our land against the threat

This isn't your land. You will die like every other human. This planet doesn't belong to you nor does anything on it based on your epidermis.

by Anonymousreply 42April 19, 2022 4:47 AM

R39 That is an inconvenient fact. LOL.

by Anonymousreply 43April 19, 2022 9:50 AM

[quote]Natives must remain on their reserves and live by hunting not welfare

Wtf are they supposed to hunt on places like the 4 Corners Reservation, which isn't even the native land of most of the tribes on it and is mostly desert scrub? The government put them on the worst land and promised them rations, but now you think they can survive on it the old fashioned way, with no buffalo to hunt?

by Anonymousreply 44April 23, 2022 3:31 AM

Well, I see the Stormfronters are on here again...

by Anonymousreply 45April 23, 2022 3:34 AM

It's a privately-held business - they have the right to refuse service to anyone, for any reason.

Go to court, lose, and piss off. Yes, your land was stolen. Your ancestors lost it, and it isn't yours anymore.

by Anonymousreply 46April 23, 2022 3:35 AM

[quote] The same assholes who use that line about refusing service are entitled pricks who think every business is supposed to coddle their spoiled asses.

Are you saying these Native people have 'spoiled asses'?

by Anonymousreply 47April 23, 2022 3:43 AM

[quote]Your ancestors lost it, and it isn't yours anymore.

Nor does it belong specifically to you, so STFU. It's funny to me when white trash with no actual accomplishments attempt to claim things belong to them or attempt to hop onto the accomplishments of others like inventions/innovations they had nothing to do with.

You don't get to decide who does and doesn't belong on THIS land if you want to play that fucking game.

by Anonymousreply 48April 23, 2022 4:07 AM

[quote] [R15] white criminals are a minority. Most blacks for example have committed violent crime so you avoid them. Native Indians are a lot like blacks. Civilization does not come naturally to all peoples.

Are you just incredibly stupid or are you intentionally posting bullshit white supremacist propaganda? Your remarks about "civilization" are obviously projection.

Violent Crime is mostly intraracial, not interracial. Whites victimize whites and blacks victimize blacks.

80+ percent of white violent crime victims are victimized by fellow whites.

Less than 1% of black people commit violent crimes.

Regardless of race, most people are not violent criminals.

58% of the US prison population is white.

Arrests and convictions are not the same thing as crimes committed.

[quote] One of the most exaggerated statistics was about the number of white people killed by other white people. Trump’s tweet claimed the number was 16 percent, while the FBI’s data shows it is 82 percent. The tweet also asserted that 81 percent of whites are killed by black people; the FBI number is 15 percent. As the Post concluded, “Trump cast blacks as the primary killers of whites, but the exact opposite is true. By overwhelming percentages, whites tend to kill other whites. Similarly, blacks tend to kill other blacks. These trends have been observed for decades.”

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 49April 23, 2022 4:17 AM

R48 Reality check, dumbass. I'm not the one making a claim of ownership on the land. Kindly find the nearest dumpster fire and fuck off.

by Anonymousreply 50April 23, 2022 4:36 AM

In the Indian days land changed hands every few years. Lots of slaves and torture. Whites formed nations to suppress tribal warfare bring civilization. Ownership of territory is determined by might. The indians were exterminated long ago. We would not exist if not for the incredible courage if our English ancestors. Pretending that the indians still own the land is pretty dangerous for whites living near reserves because the indians take this literally and are as dangerous as blacks . Races must be kept separate. The races are not equal. Only your own race counts.

by Anonymousreply 51April 24, 2022 7:26 PM

R51 Agree than ownership is determined by might - the rest of your spew is racist horseshit. The biological differences between the "races" is trivial. We are one species, and genetic diversity is important for any species to survive.

by Anonymousreply 52April 24, 2022 8:40 PM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!