I could have stuck this in a number of threads, but I figured it deserved its own because DL fav Lady C. shares the scoop on what the BRF and foreign royals thought of Harry and Meagan's absence from Philip's memorial service. For years she's been quite chummy with several royals living Britain who are closely related to the BRF, but not members of the BRF, so there is probably a fair bit of truth to what Lady C. has to say and it's really quite entertaining regardless either way.
It all boils down to Meghan is an extreme narcissist.
Shocking.
by Anonymous | reply 1 | April 3, 2022 6:40 AM |
What in the fuck is wrong with you OP for wasting bandwidth on this nonsense?
Get out of here. Shitbag. There are enough threads on this
by Anonymous | reply 2 | April 3, 2022 7:05 AM |
Lady C . makes an excellent observation. Meghan's pathological narcissism and insecurity have destroyed her and her equally stupid husband.
by Anonymous | reply 3 | April 3, 2022 8:56 AM |
đ€Łđ€Łđ
by Anonymous | reply 4 | April 3, 2022 9:10 AM |
Does the Lady show her shriveled noodle?
by Anonymous | reply 5 | April 3, 2022 9:45 AM |
Can you please summarise it so we don't have to listen to the whole tedious video?
by Anonymous | reply 6 | April 3, 2022 6:36 PM |
The "Lady" is man. A little detail that she somehow forgot to mention to her husband of 9 months, Lord Cambell (whom she finagled into marrying her 5 days after meeting). He is a grifter.
by Anonymous | reply 7 | April 3, 2022 6:55 PM |
Harry's a spoiled nitwit and Meghan's a shrill, grasping whore. I'm sure he regrets marrying that fetid bit of offal but he's stuck with her. I don't think we'll be stuck with her much longer; all of the news about them lately has tarnished their "brand" and people seem to be losing interest in the Ginge and Cringe.
by Anonymous | reply 8 | April 3, 2022 7:05 PM |
Whose balls are smaller, Harry's or Will's?
by Anonymous | reply 9 | April 3, 2022 9:25 PM |
Either way r7 their book about Diana turned out to be accurate. Their sources were spot on.
by Anonymous | reply 10 | April 4, 2022 6:59 AM |
Here are the ball size rankings, R9.
3: Harry
2: William
1: Lady Colin Campbell, pre-op
by Anonymous | reply 11 | April 4, 2022 8:20 AM |
"Lady" C is a Brexiteer and a pro-Putin cunt.
No matter how much tea "she" might have on the BRF: Fuck her.
by Anonymous | reply 12 | April 4, 2022 12:23 PM |
Only that Harry hasn't got his balls any more, except when Meghan hands them to him so that he can do some juggling with them in the garden.
by Anonymous | reply 13 | April 4, 2022 12:25 PM |
No one with an IQ above 70 cares about anything that crazy hermaphrodite has do say.
by Anonymous | reply 14 | April 4, 2022 12:53 PM |
Is it the Queen herself who is phoning Lady C???!!!
by Anonymous | reply 15 | April 4, 2022 12:54 PM |
That's what George Ziadie (a.k.a. Lady Colin Campbell) would have you believe. And the half-witted viewers, judging by the comments section under the videos, do seem to believe it.
by Anonymous | reply 16 | April 4, 2022 12:57 PM |
[quote]The family's pre-eminent social position as claimed by Lady Colin Campbell is not borne out by reference works; certainly this notional status had waned by 1969, with only one member, Edward George Ziadie, a dry goods merchant, appearing in that year's Who's Who in Jamaica, detailing the "Careers of Principal Public Men and Women of Jamaica", alongside an advertisement for a real estate company, "Victor Ziadie Realty".
It's always a good time to remember this bitchy passage from the "Ziadie family" Wikipedia page. "A dry goods merchant" - the very idea!
by Anonymous | reply 17 | April 4, 2022 1:01 PM |
Liz needs to have that old freak dealt with.
by Anonymous | reply 18 | April 4, 2022 1:02 PM |
Sheâs essentially Meghan Markle, but with greater intelligence and discipline â-an outsider to Britain who parlayed a fleeting connection with royalty/aristocracy into a career. She guards her Lady C identity as jealously as Meghan does the dukedom of Sussex. Lady C actually has a brain and a lot of initiative, however.
by Anonymous | reply 19 | April 4, 2022 1:02 PM |
[quote] Sheâs essentially Meghan Markle, but with greater intelligence and discipline â-an outsider to Britain who parlayed a fleeting connection with royalty/aristocracy into a career. She guards her Lady C identity as jealously as Meghan does the dukedom of Sussex. Lady C actually has a brain and a lot of initiative, however.
He's a grifter who finagled a 9 month marriage to a "lord" a week after they met and finagled her 9 month marriage into a career as a professional gossip. Megan Markle gave up her acting career to marry Harry. We don't know which woman is more intelligent or disciplined. We do know that "Lady C" is certainly much more intelligent than her fans.
by Anonymous | reply 20 | April 4, 2022 5:45 PM |
Meghan. Is not making her living as an actor. No one will hire her. Sheâs making her living as someone connected to a socially connected personâ-exactly like Lady C. I have no particular use for Lady C but if you compare her level of historical knowledge and ability to express herself to Meghanâs open letters itâs pretty embarrassing for Meghan. The fact that Meghan is much lazier than her is even more indisputable. Lady C has produced several full length booksânot childrenâs books, produces several videos a week, and oversaw the restoration of a castle. Meghan struggles to produce a podcast even with the help of staff and a bunch of celebrity friends.
by Anonymous | reply 21 | April 4, 2022 5:51 PM |
No member of the BRF would talk to this shriveled twatâŠshe knows no one of any consequence, and just yammers shit to try to be relevant, which she is not
by Anonymous | reply 22 | April 4, 2022 6:00 PM |
She's a man!
by Anonymous | reply 23 | April 4, 2022 6:11 PM |
The Queen saying to Harry, "You don't marry showgirls; you fuck them."
by Anonymous | reply 24 | April 4, 2022 6:46 PM |
R24 - I thought Prince Philip made that statement???
by Anonymous | reply 25 | April 4, 2022 6:58 PM |
Lady C is pro Putin, doesn't believe raping children is pedophilia and lied to her former husband about having a penis. I know of a girl who used to attend an elite London dance conservatory with a blueblood that dated a Royal. Lady C like Carole Middleton is laughed at by the bluebloods. They don't tell her squat. Very amusing info about her "son" as well.
by Anonymous | reply 26 | April 4, 2022 7:15 PM |
R7 She is not a âman.â She was born with a genital malformation. Her labia was fused. Her family forced her into being raised male and even forced her to take male hormones. Of course having a male child was preferable. At age 21, she had the easy surgery to correct the malformation.
by Anonymous | reply 27 | April 4, 2022 7:20 PM |
She takes forever to say gossip we already know. Sounds like high school.
by Anonymous | reply 28 | April 4, 2022 7:26 PM |
Meghan's Achilles heel is her lack of discipline. It's why she gets in the room, but everything falls apart. No follow-through. No long game. Imagine where she would be with Kate's discipline.
by Anonymous | reply 29 | April 4, 2022 7:28 PM |
Those two Russian mail order "sons" haven't strangled the ole tranny for his jewels?
by Anonymous | reply 30 | April 4, 2022 7:30 PM |
Meghan is also boring. Lady C has a memorable persona. You may hate it or ridicule it, but you remember it and sometimes pay attention to it.
by Anonymous | reply 31 | April 4, 2022 7:33 PM |
[quote] Meghan. Is not making her living as an actor. No one will hire her. Sheâs making her living as someone connected to a socially connected personâ-exactly like Lady C. I have no particular use for Lady C but if you compare her level of historical knowledge and ability to express herself to Meghanâs open letters itâs pretty embarrassing for Meghan. The fact that Meghan is much lazier than her is even more indisputable. Lady C has produced several full length booksânot childrenâs books, produces several videos a week, and oversaw the restoration of a castle. Meghan struggles to produce a podcast even with the help of staff and a bunch of celebrity friends.
He's a grifter who finagled a 9 month marriage to a "lord" a week after they met and finagled her 9 month marriage into a career as a professional gossip. Megan Markle gave up her acting career to marry Harry. We don't know which woman is more intelligent or disciplined. We do know that "Lady C" is certainly much more intelligent than her fans.
by Anonymous | reply 33 | April 4, 2022 7:53 PM |
Does her pussy stink? If she has one, that is.
by Anonymous | reply 34 | April 4, 2022 8:07 PM |
R9, most likely "Lady" C's.
by Anonymous | reply 35 | April 4, 2022 8:28 PM |
R33, thank you. If some want to believe a fantasy pushed by an obvious grifter than go ahead but others of us prefer to remain reality-based.
And, yes, I'm talking about Lord C.
by Anonymous | reply 36 | April 4, 2022 8:35 PM |
R26 Can you read? She had fused labia at birth. Her parents forced her to take male hormones. When she came of age, she had the surgery that corrected the labia issue, and resumed life as the biological female she had been born.
Blue bloods laugh at everyone . . . Until they end up on thrones.
For someone snooty bluebloods laughed at, I think Carole Middleton is having the last laugh.
by Anonymous | reply 37 | April 4, 2022 8:56 PM |
^That said, I agree with everyone who says Lady C is gull of hot air. No one in the know would talk to her.
She had one good moment, and that was her biography of Diana. It was shrewd, accurate, and its premises borne out later by events.
Then she went back to stupid regurgitation of ridiculous old myths and gossips, particularly in her bio of the Queen Mother.
It got horrible reviews and was laughed off the shelves.
It was quite obvious why Harry skipped the memorial. Ffs, the Home Secretary was there, and Harrybis suing the Home Office for police protection because he doesn't "feel safe" in England without it.
He'd have screwed his legal case, and he knows that most everyone in the Abbey, especially the other royals, view him with massive contempt.
You didn't need Lady C to figure that one out.
She's full of shit.
by Anonymous | reply 38 | April 4, 2022 9:06 PM |
R37 Caitlyn Jenner also claimed to have bottom surgery but later denied it. Ts lie.
by Anonymous | reply 39 | April 4, 2022 9:50 PM |
I donât know what she said in this video, but it doesnât take an âinsiderâ to know that Meghan is one fucked-up broad. Once bitten, twice shy. I had her number from the second she came on the scene as Harryâs fiancĂ©e.
by Anonymous | reply 40 | April 4, 2022 10:09 PM |
LOVE lady C ,she has more connections than the people who bash her will ever have , even in their little hatefilled dreams.
by Anonymous | reply 41 | April 4, 2022 10:41 PM |
R39 She had a fused labia not a penis and testicles.
by Anonymous | reply 42 | April 4, 2022 11:29 PM |
Has River commented yet? Or Nicholas Formica or whatever his name is?
by Anonymous | reply 44 | April 4, 2022 11:40 PM |
mucus secretions from the cervix moistens and macerates the vagina
by Anonymous | reply 45 | April 4, 2022 11:52 PM |
I actually believed this was a operable vagina.
by Anonymous | reply 46 | April 5, 2022 1:40 AM |
R36. What fantasy are you talking about? I said both Meghan and Lady C launched their carers based on brief connections to famous families. You then make the sane point but way Iâm a fantasist. Are you sure you know how to read?
by Anonymous | reply 47 | April 5, 2022 2:16 AM |
Same here r40. The minute I saw her I could tell she was bad news. A look at her social media confirmed it.
by Anonymous | reply 48 | April 5, 2022 4:16 AM |
I was always skeptical an American and an actress could successfully negotiate that way of life but it seemed possible for about a day and a half around the wedding. Her wide-eyed, enthusiastic ignorance and dominance of the engagement interview seemed odd. The guest list was hard to explain. I honestly didn't think she would turn out to be everything she has turned out to be. I guess I should update all my passwords, I'm fairly easily fooled.
by Anonymous | reply 49 | April 5, 2022 12:26 PM |
R40 R48 There was something very off-putting about her in the engagement interview. She came across as calculated and fake as fuck. At the beginning of that interview, I was hyped to see an American girl who made good. Within five minutes, I knew she was going to be trouble.
by Anonymous | reply 50 | April 5, 2022 12:47 PM |
Jamie Lee Curtis has been married to Lord Christopher Guest for a long time. She seems to be doing well. But the aristocracy is not the royal family. Autumn Philips, whilst not an actress, came from a very working-class Canadian family, and she did very well in the BRF, everyone liked her. She's moved on to a wealthy guy and they seem quite happy. The shocking letter from MM's half brother told us everything we needed to know and it all came to pass.
by Anonymous | reply 51 | April 5, 2022 2:00 PM |
Curtis has made a success of it because she rejects the title: "Her father-in-law was a British hereditary peer; when he died on April 8, 1996, her husband succeeded him and became the 5th Baron Haden-Guest. By marriage, she takes on the title Baroness Haden-Guest of Saling in Essex. As the wife of a peer she is styled The Right Honourable The Lady Haden-Guest. Curtis rejects the idea of using this title, saying, "It has nothing to do with me".[52]"
by Anonymous | reply 52 | April 5, 2022 2:19 PM |
The ability to spot people like Meghan comes, unfortunately, from experience. Maybe younger people havenât been fooled, used and dropped by one of them yet.
by Anonymous | reply 53 | April 5, 2022 2:25 PM |
Meghan got in by supporting Harry's view of himself as an ill-done-by victim - alone of all his girlfriends, she grasped what he really wanted: confirmation of his world view. She got in as Harry's weapon against his family. It showed from the moment they were officially engaged, in the stilted interview, the outrageously expensive engagement dress, picking a French design firm to do her wedding gown, her ugly behaviour toward the Cambridges, the Queen's dresser, the secret birth and godparents, the anger at "only" getting Frogmore Cottage, hostility toward the press a year before they finally announced the engagement, the bad treatment of staff . . . Meghan antagonised everyone.
I'm over 70 and have seen quite the handful of royal engagements, marriages, divorces . . . but I have never seen anyone come into the BRF with so clearly an oppositional stance as Meghan Markle. Charles and Diana were a horrible mismatch, Margaret was a doomed woman and Armstrong-Jones a really bad choice, Fergie seemed at least fun at the beginning and eager to please but lacked self-discipline, Anne's marriage had an appealing beginning, so did Edward's . . . the rocks began to show later in the ones that eventually failed.
But none of the married-ins in the group came into the family with their backs up, chips on their shoulders, and the Fuck You attitude that emanated from Meghan.
Anyone with eyes could see in the awful clothes she wore at the photocall, Harry's barely smiling face, the awkward engagement interview, and the $70,000 over the top gown she chose for the Perfume Ad engagement photos (Kate wore a nice white suit that ran about $1,000), that Meghan was just there to get what she could as fast as she could and get out.
No one was surprised at the outcome; shocked maybe, but not surprised.
by Anonymous | reply 54 | April 5, 2022 7:13 PM |
Absolutely r53.
by Anonymous | reply 55 | April 6, 2022 6:53 PM |
One quick Google search told you all you needed to know.
by Anonymous | reply 56 | April 6, 2022 9:58 PM |
[quote] As the wife of a peer she is styled The Right Honourable The Lady Haden-Guest. Curtis rejects the idea of using this title, saying, "It has nothing to do with me"
She has attended the Opening of (British) Parliament, sitting in the Peeresses Gallery and wearing a tiara.
by Anonymous | reply 57 | April 7, 2022 3:24 AM |
R57, she can choose not to use the title but as her husband accepted his, hers is automatic.
I donât know when Jamie attended the opening of Parliament but it had to have been almost 25 years ago because Christopher hasnât been a member since 1999 when most of the hereditary Lords were removed.
by Anonymous | reply 58 | April 7, 2022 3:41 AM |
It was 1998. You can Google pictures of her.
by Anonymous | reply 59 | April 7, 2022 12:14 PM |
R58. Correct. I think it was her last opportunity to attend.
by Anonymous | reply 60 | April 7, 2022 12:15 PM |
Married women in the UK, especially England. wear tiaras (if they own one) to all formal events. That is just the way it is.
The opening of Parliament is a formal daytime event.
by Anonymous | reply 61 | April 7, 2022 12:21 PM |
The irony Iâm not that she was wearing a tiara but that she was at the opening.
by Anonymous | reply 62 | April 7, 2022 12:22 PM |
Is Lady C getting her information from Princess Michael of Kent?
by Anonymous | reply 63 | April 7, 2022 12:26 PM |
R63 - Sounds about right.
by Anonymous | reply 64 | April 7, 2022 1:45 PM |
Nobody from the top-shelf would talk to her, surely.
by Anonymous | reply 65 | April 7, 2022 11:20 PM |
More likely Prince George of Cambridge.
by Anonymous | reply 66 | April 7, 2022 11:30 PM |
WTF
by Anonymous | reply 67 | April 7, 2022 11:30 PM |
[quote] Is Lady C getting her information from Princess Michael of Kent?
She hates Princess Michael.
Nobody in the BRF would ever talk to Lady C. after her books on Diana and the Queen Mum. She is friends with a few of the Queen's Bowes-Lyon cousins and a couple of Prince Philip's godchildren who are related to him through his sisters. They probably give her tidbits here and there.
by Anonymous | reply 68 | April 8, 2022 8:11 AM |
Her megalomania is in full flower in her latest video. She speaks at length of her ancient Jamaican family and the good breeding it instilled in her. There are some useful tips on how to deal with the help as well
by Anonymous | reply 69 | April 10, 2022 7:48 PM |