Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Are reading glasses really so bad?

I’ll be having cataract surgery and I’m trying to decide whether or not to get a multi-focal lens. Insurance doesn’t cover the extra cost which my doctor says will be $2,800 per eye. (I only need surgery in one eye.). The advantage over a standard lens is that I will have enhanced near-distance vision and probably won’t need reading glasses most of the time. The downside is a slight trade-off in the quality of my distance vision.

I’m thinking I’ve been wearing reading glasses for a long time, and they are a pain in the ass. But Is getting rid of them worth the extra money and less-clear distance vision?

by Anonymousreply 5March 15, 2022 6:56 PM

I don't think so. I have -7.5 vision (which has actually been stable for years now). Have worn contacts since middle school. Never needed to wear readers until a couple years ago. But my near vision got to the point where I REALLY couldn't read expiration dates at the grocery store or small print on documents. So now I have about 30 pairs of readers around the house, in the office, in my car - ranging from -1.0 to -1.5, and ranging from Dollar Tree cheapies to higher quality ones (better construction, higher quality lense). Only need them if wearing my contacts (which I almost always do during the day). The between my eye and lense on my regular glasses is enough.

I've though about Lasik; my optometrist brings it up every visit. But, so far I haven't. The only reason I even consider it is for emergencies. Like what if I'm in a situation and I don't have my glasses and a contact fell out or something.

by Anonymousreply 1March 11, 2022 9:33 PM

I never needed glasses until about 45 when I realized I needed them. I went for years with drugstore "readers" but realized I needed progressively stronger ones. Got prescription reading glasses, then got multiple pairs because they were never where I needed them. That got expensive. Finally at age 60, I bit the bullet and got progressives and wear them everyday. I have a relatively plain face and think the frames give my face some character.

by Anonymousreply 2March 11, 2022 9:52 PM

Best guide I’ve found.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 3March 15, 2022 6:40 PM

Good looking people look good with good eyeglasses

by Anonymousreply 4March 15, 2022 6:49 PM

I think I’m going to get the monofocal. I’m not will to trade quality of distance vision or night vision for better reading vision when I’m already used to reading glasses. Plus, it’s thousands of dollars less cost.

by Anonymousreply 5March 15, 2022 6:56 PM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!