Catherine Duchess of Cambridge admits she is broody again

She wants to be 100% certain Meghan never gets anywhere near the Crown.

r1 Many brits share her feelings!!

Hey I'd be bouncing on Big Willy's cock all day if I were her.

Wow, she's a regular hillbilly.

I thought only poor people had so many kids. But I guess when you marry trash, that's what happens.

William is just using her as a brood mare.

Kate’s are 100% homegrown, too.

Not bought. No slipping faux baby bump for Kate.

[quote] William is just using her as a brood mare.

Well they both have horse faces, so it works out quite well for them.

r3 Snap me too!!

Sorry, Waitey Katie.

But becoming barefoot and pregnant once again, isn't going to keep William at home.

He'll still be having fun with his mistress, Rose Hanbury.

r5 How did you figure that out when she has made the suggestion herself? She does have moral agency of her own.

R6 if a bump had fallen out she would have reacted differently. And come on, to have cheek and lip fillers to look pregnant is a bit much.

Three makes a lot of sense, because whenever it's been just two (Elizabeth and Margaret, William and Harry) the younger has no one to talk with and feels very lost and alone and left out.

But more than three children would be a burden on the state. It means lifelong security arrangements as long as his father is either heir to the throne or king, and it likely means they will need another royal palace and staff when they're older.

Hell, maybe she'll drop a litter next time.

Catherine looks great there.

[quote]if a bump had fallen out she would have reacted differently. And come on, to have cheek and lip fillers to look pregnant is a bit much.

You're expecting logic and reason from a Meghan hater?

r12 Not true Edward and Anne don't have lifetime state security but only security when they are working. Harry has none.

R12 & R16 Assuming things don't change....down the road the only members of the family that would get round the clock security would be King William, Queen Catherine and Prince George. Charlotte and Louis would only get it when on royal duties.

Oh barf.

Also, Surviving Angel, get a hobby.

Whiile I'd find it pretty amusing if Kate had another baby, I tend to think she and William are done with babymaking. They'll be Prince and Princess of Wales in the foreseeable future, and, judging by Charles' looks, King and Queen not too long after that. They'll be busy enough without another toddler in tow.

r19 I still think there is a decent chance the Queen will live longer then her mother so could be here until at least 2028.

r18 It took me just as much time to write my brief OP starting the thread as it did you to type your sad trolling post. So by the same token of your malicious logic you need to get a hobby and a job too.

Don’t put words in my mouth. I don’t hate her R15. I dislike her deceptive ways.

Ew. I like Kate but this is tmi. Then she goes down a slide. Is she Fergie now? Christ. I prefer my royals like the Queen or Camilla or Anne, friendly but with a dignified reserve.

[quote] Catherine Duchess of Cambridge admits she is broody again

Broody, as in BROOD MARE.

Kate's not having another baby--if she were, she wouldn't talk about it. A nice way to grab a headline or two and look relatable, though.

She seems like a great mom. Loving, interested, and very fun.

Joey P.

Maybe if the Duchess cut her Secondary School hair

and tried to move forward with her life, such as it is...

as one does when one makes a bad marriage

She's just trolling Harry and Meghan. Imagining the screaming and plate-smashing at chez Harkle is probably just as entertaining for her as it is to the rest of us.

Speaking of, R29, have the cops been called 'roubd to Monteshittio lately?

[quote] But more than three children would be a burden on the state.

LOL! Please. Don't be ridic.

Personally, I like big families. There should be more big families and fewer idiots having babies.

R4 Meghan, is that you?

“Broody”? I can feel the mug-cradling from here.

R28 Darling, she's living a great life and don't worry about it moving on . . . Princess of Wales and Queen of Great Britain and NI, etc. VERY nice prospects.

Such as it is . . . Paid travel to foreign climes. Gorgeous homes, gorgeous clothes, lovely children - say did you miss the new IPSOS poll showing Kate has passed her husband as the second most popular royal in the country?

Even in America, she's twice as popular as Meghan.

Must be the hair.

I’m just saying…

R9 Sweetie I know it bites that even Americans like Kate so much more than you, er, I mean Meghan.

You can sling that mud from now till Kingdome Come.

It won't make a difference here or to the brilliant future of Kate & Co.

Suck it up, dear.

She just needs a vacation from her grueling “work.”

Kate's pr budget must be through the roof. I love how try hard it makes her seem. Paying people to praise her on gossip sites and troll Meghan. The brf has hit a new low.

Who’s laying the eggs? Baroness Broodmare…

A new low is Harry needing to be seen with a York sister so that her royal dust will rub off on him.

R9 = jealous Meghan

Will does not want another kid.

Kate...you have enough to do with visits to charities, schools and ribbon cuttings. No more rug rats.

Plenty of parents, especially mothers, get nostalgic around babies. That doesn't mean they're gonna run out and have another.

Sorry but I just cringe hearing Kate directly address this matter in public. The Queen would never have done that.

The Queen has made numerous terrible decisions recently, as well as over the years. Kate will actually be a better Queen overall.

Meghan is living her best life!

Looking like that??

I feel bad for Kate. Her life must be misery. She has to go out almost every day and put on goofy, fake smiles in front of a bunch of weird strangers. And for what? She will have to work until she dies.

Kate's ugly, pan faced sister was so much smarter. She's free to do what she wants, when she wants. And she'll never have to work.

R48 Meghan, nobody buys your bullshit. And do something about your hair. And can't your good friend Oprah give you a free subscription to Weight Watchers?

She's fat. It makes her face even uglier.

Kate is not going to carry another baby to full term at the age of 40.

Not a fan of any of these people, well, except for Anne, and "fan" is a bit strong. Anyway, my fat, horribly out of shape sister in law just dropped her third crotch dropping and she's 42. (Yes, I do think it is a band-aid baby, but I digress.) Kate looks quite fit, I doubt it would be hard for her to pop one out. Not that I'm an expert to put it mildly. Also, she gets that morning sickness excuse to use to get out of things again. They might plan a "surprise" for when the queen finally pops her clogs to cheer up the masses. Everyone LOVES a new baby (except me) right?

When will this cunt admit her eating disorder?

Kate looks so much better when she’s pregnant. Softer.

Of course she could achieve the same effect by just gaining 15 pounds.

Ooohhhh look at all the Kate Haters invading from CB and probably like Bouzy bring paid to trash her on a notoriously Ee See Through Meghan site.

You reek of rage and envy. Your perjuring grifter's polla can't even beat Kate's in Meghan's own country, let alone Kate's.

Go tell Kaiser and Sunshine Sachs that if they can't even persuade Meghan's own countrymen to like their client, maybe they should reassess the client.

Yeah, photos of Jate today standing between Queen Margrethe and Crown Princess Mary at Christianborg Palace, looking better than both women in that stunning Catherine Walker coat...

You poor sods. No one has to be paid to praise that.

Meghan would have sold all you trolls, her mother, her kids, and her hope of Heaven to stand there in Kate's place.

Eat it, trolls. We see you.

And, blocking everyvdingle one of the Kate Hate posts is highly instructive. As well as freshen the air in the room.

ugh the royals have definitely fallen a few notches.

imagine that’s your life….

[quote]She just needs a vacation from her grueling “work.”

I don't know what your vacations are like, R37, but I'm guessing throwing up all day every day until you have to be hospitalized isn't high on your bucket list. Having a baby is a heroic pastime for women with hyperemisis gravidarum. It actually killed Charlotte Bronte.

Meghan could all too well imagine it. Imagine her shock when she found put that it was actually Kate who was going to live the life Meghan was imagining . . . Diana 2.0, the grand homes, the grand jewels from the Queen's collection, the adoring public, the cowed sister in law . . .

Ooopsie!

R51 What planet are you living on?

Women over 40 carry babies to full term every day, espe daily of they've already done so successfully. Line, you know, three times? In their thirties?

Christ, my sister had a second baby at 41 at full term, no miracles, no infertility treatments, no c-sections.

They used to call 40' something babies the. Change of life surprise baby. Where did you get the idea that none of those babies were full term?

R56, let me guess: Those complaining about "the Meghan haters" are the very ones who call Catherine a dumb cunt, an anorexic whore, a lazy bitch, etc

Am I right?

Meghan should sue Backgrid. She looks like a cackling crone, and she is so clearly overacting for the camera that it's pathetic.

And no one looking at that photo of Meghan and her Look At My Long Straight White Girl Hair! has any business talking about Kate's.

Jesus, you can tell Meghan is using the hair to hide how fat her face is.

Megs latest wig is the extra shiny Barbie Princezz model.

If you look at the pictures in the Mail you see the one thing that drives me nuts about Kate and William... they often look unconfident in photographs. Look at the picture of Kate, Mary and the Queen. Kate holds her hands in what we call the fig leaf position, as if shielding the groin. It's considered in body language a mark of insecurity. William often does this too. It's a mystery to me why they would feel uncomfortable with anything they're doing at this point (other than reading the newspapers in the morning.) The Danish royals either clasp their hands at waist level or stand tall and confident with hands at sides. The Queen doesn't do it, Princess Anne doesn't do it... Kate and William do...

The other thing that drives me nuts is William's failure to button his jackets.

nobody cares about the ache in this woman's ovaries.

R28- she can't cut the hair.

Her face shape requires longer lengths.

Broody? How exhausting.

"I can't use Covid as an excuse anymore so how can I take a nine month vacation?"

Can we once and for all get it right. Your title , Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge. This is NOT her title. She is The Duchess of Cambridge. Putting the name first is not some poncy extra way of elevating them. It means they have been dumped for another one. It instantly tells you they are divorced. The wife of the Prince of Wales is The Princess of Wales. Camilla is the current Princess of Wales. She chose to call herself Duchess of Cornwall using one of Prince Charles’ many other titles fearing public outcry at the time using the same title as Diana although she is entitled to it. If Charles divorces Camilla she become Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall. The Princess of Wales became Diana, Princess of Wales. Divorced. The Duchess of Argyle became Margret Duchess of Argyle. Divorced. If the husband dies they become Dowager. Immediately telling you they are widowed. Dowager Duchess. Widowed. Our current Queen’s mother’s title was Queen Elizabeth.. When George VI died she became Dowager Queen of England. Hence the famous picture of three Queens in mourning. Queen Mary (mother of dead king) Queen Elizabeth (wife of dead king) ) Queen Elizabeth ( Daughter of dead Queen and current Monarch) . To avoid confusion the Queen’ mother asked to be known as Queen Mother, not an official title, because she was still Queen Elizabeth. The Duchess of Sussex is not Megan. Duchess of Sussex. She is The Duchess of Sussex. If they divorce she becomes Megan Duchess of Sussex. The people of Sussex are calling for the titles to be removed. They do fuck all for the folk of Sussex. Meghan can then still call herself Princess Harry because she is married to Prince Harry. This tells us she is not of the royal family or she would be Princess Meghan, daughter of a ruling Monarch. As in Princess Anne. Daughter of. Ruling Monarch. Princess Michael of Kent is not called Michael. Her name is Marie Astrid or some shit. The title tells you she is married to Prince Michael. No, I don’t give a shit about any of them but don’t invent titles because you think it sounds grander putting the name first. [R69] you’re right she just wants another year of not working.

R69 we're Americans. We don't give a fuck about all that made up title bullshit.

We did away with that a few centuries ago.

[quote]Having a baby is a heroic pastime for women with hyperemisis gravidarum.

You're laying it on a bit thick here.

How soon before she’s swollen with William’s seed again?

Have the Cambridges had the same nanny/nannies for their children through the years?

I wonder how many nannies the Sussexes have gone through already.

Reese Witherspoon was rumored to be a nightmare and nanny agencies didn't want to work with her. I wonder if Meghan has dethroned Reese as the worst to work for.

R70, the American embrace of disdaining anything not American is so impressive. Supersizing, the Second Amendment, vaccine rates. And today gun deaths overtook car crashes as the leading cause of trauma deaths. It's easy to see where the confidence comes from.

lol, r34 and true.

What r34 wrote.

The DoC v. the DoS rumble exists only in their Stans over-invested, wobbly neurons.

Kate is It. The One. Frau-A-Saurus Apex. She's the moon ignoring a barking dog.

The reality of Kate's position is as the wife of the Duke of Cambridge, who will one day be King of the United Kingdom and the Commonwealth realms.

That's why this whole Kate v. Meghan thing is ridiculous on its face.

And no Markle Stans, I'm not referring to Markle as the dog in my metaphor. Given, however, where us humans have brought ourselves, we'd be complimented to be compared to dogs.

Kate is boringly, thrillingly perfect in her role. William is lucky she chose him. He's lucky she waited for him.

No human being, however, should have more than 3 children.

ooops, I meant to write in my r75 post - lol, r40 and true.

Agreed, Della. There is no competition. One is doing her job as expected, the other has left for the life she prefers.

But which one lives life in wallowing in a purpetual bitchfest and litigation and which one does not, R77?

I was trying to be a good sport, R77. ;)

Gotcha R77. Sorry.

Considering that this thread is about the UK, the audacity of this statement is stunning:

[quote] [R70], the American embrace of disdaining anything not American is so impressive

Well, R81, I wrote it and I am not American and since I pay membership and it's accepted the "it's a U.S. board" argument sounds pretty feeble to me. I just tire of that reflexive "we're Americans so we don't care." Being American is really no better than being from any other country on earth. I did poke you all in the eye with the stats but DL seems to love whatabout so I didn't violate any norms. With all due respect, a little humble wouldn't come amiss.

Isn't she almost 40?

[quote]Having a baby is a heroic pastime for women with hyperemisis gravidarum

No, having a baby is a hobby. PERIOD

My friend had her 1st baby at 45. No one has babies at 21 anymore.

R83, what has Lilibet got to do with it?

Of all the major “projects” I’ve taken on in life, having a (first, only) baby at 41 was the only one that was easier than I anticipated. But then I’m from good peasant stock, and I don’t pride myself on being frail and weak.

Not downplaying Kate’s real medical issues, however. But some women milk that pregnancy thing for all it’s worth.

R85 check back with us in 20 years after the baby has various disorders and conditions needing surgery due to old DNA.

R86 mixed race women have more youthful genes than peasant stock mixed with German DNA living on a dreary damp moldy island.

And Kate comes with the benefit of very stable, still married parents and her siblings have fallen in step as well. The sister left behind her gun-waving antics with aristos and sensibly settled down with the son of a Jewish billionaire. Kate's brother, while an idiot with his attempts to be an "entrepreneur" is harmless and has never caused PR problems.

Truth r48. Pippa and Kate Middleton are both useless, but at least Pippa is useless on her husband’s dime, not the taxpayers.

Whenever anybody makes a point of claiming someone is Jewish on this board, as good Presbyterian, my spidey sense goes up.

The Matthews family are not Jewish.

It cracks me up that the BRF is using dumb cunt Kate for breeding, just like a farm animal.

She's fucking pathetic.

For r93

MOO!

I don’t dislike Kate, but it’s a pity she’s held out as some sort of role model. She’s not terribly accomplished in her own right.

Jamaican twitter is going off. The Daily Heil printed a story that called the Windrush deportees Criminals. It looked bad that a plane full of Windrush Britians flight was rescheduled so as not to disrupt the Cambridges tour. So the Daily Heil which is the BRF go to tabloid decides to infer that they are criminals. That is more acceptable to their disgusting readers. The Cambridges are getting slaughtered on Twitter.

R96, who holds her out as a role model?

Yeah, what r98 asks.

R65 - So why are you here?

R89 - The finding actually was that the gene that "shaves years off your life" gene is present amongst blacks and whites. You're more likely to have it if you're black, but not guaranteed to have it either way.

And it hasn't got the remotest connection to fertility, ability to gestate and deliver a baby, or looks.

"As of 2020, Hispanics Life Expectancy was 78.8 years, followed by Non Hispanic Whites at 77.6 years and Non Hispanic blacks at 71.8 Years"

Given the life spans of father's grandmother, mother, and father, all of whom were alabaster skinned Anglos, they must have had the gene, too.

And since Meghan is mixed race, she may just as likely have missed out on that gene thanks to her mother being stupid enough to marry a white man.

Kate was being light. She has no fucking intention of having another baby with the shadow of the throne lengthening over her and William every day.

Meanwhile, can we talk about the fucking Catherine Walker coat, and the unmissable Three Queen's Message in that photo?

Meghan Markle never looked as good as either of these two women do right here in her fucking life.

People who post here hold Kate Middleton up as some goddess when she hasn’t really accomplished Jack shit. She’s spent most of her life waiting at William’s beck and call like some useless concubine.

R97 - They were CONVICTED criminals. The fact that they've been living in the UK all their lives does not remotely indicate that they aren't criminals. They have been tried and convicted.

Go crawl back under that rock you slid out from under.

R96 Diana's only accomplishment was looking good in clothes, Fergie...well eating? Meghan a bad actress and terrible poet? What do you want?

God, I hate Twitter. Almost as much as I hate people who take obscure Twitter seriously.

R104 - Oh, you forgot about Diana shaking the hand of an AIDS patient to help destigmatise the disease and its connection to the gay community?

I wasn't mad about the gel, but she did ten+ years representing the nation quite well, and that WAS her job.

Their accomplishment is how well they serve the monarchy and the country. They aren't supposed to have also become doctors, scientists, astronauts, and great artists.

Not one of the BRF wives who married into the family are that accomplished. Diana, Sophie. Not even Meghan. But she did have a career as an actress, even if it was on a mediocre tv show. Kate has done even less than that.

It's certainly true that Kate is no Meghan.

R73 - Yes. Nanny Maria, a native of Spain, came on when George was born and is still with the Cambridges.

She is from the Spanish city of Palencia , was already forty or so when she came on staff after George was born.

Kate is a nothing burger with a tampon attached to it.

^^Seethe, poor jealous ting

Hilary Mantel put it best in her essay on Middleton.

Put Kate the BROOD MARE out back in the stable, with our chickens!

You’ve posted that essay before, haven’t you, R112? It’s ugly and misogynistic, and made me lose respect for Mantel.

It's so funny that some of you call Suits a mediocre show. It actually had better ratings for their first 3 seasons than Mad Men did. Mad Men didn't really pick up viewers until it's 5th season. And that's despite Mad Men winning emmy's for their first season.

It also had more viewers than The Sopranos did their first season.

You can say what you want about it, but it made ton of money for the network. It lasted 9 seasons. They had good ratings until she left. Suits made more money for their network than Mad Men did. And it cost 1/10th of what Mad Men cost to produce.

you may not like it, but it's the truth. A lot of you are complete strangers with the truth

R111 I would only want her expense accounts. Y’all can worship this bitch all day long for all I care.

I wonder which audience advertisers would prefer? Mad Men or Suits? Hmmmm..... what would the truth be about that?

[quote]It's so funny that some of you call Suits a mediocre show. It actually had better ratings for their first 3 seasons than Mad Men did.

Is Kate on "Suits"?

R118, sometimes they try a gentler, roundabout approach, instead of the usual Klan Grannies, cunts and deathwishes.

[quote]I wonder which audience advertisers would prefer? Mad Men or Suits? Hmmmm..... what would the truth be about that?

The advertisers would prefer their ads run during Suits. And if you weren't so stupid, you would know that. Suits actually has a younger demographic than Mad Men.

That would be the truth you dumb fuck. Like I said, you and the truth are complete strangers.

[quote]Is Kate on "Suits"?

No, Kate's never had a job.

R115, Mad Men, famously, was a prestige show that made no money for AMC. It always had low ratings. The Walking Dead paid for Mad Men.

I'll F&F you before I block you, vermin. So pathetically easy to rattle. Which comes next from you, Klan Granny or cunt?

So predictable.

The Cambridges seem to have running joke about her fondness for babies.. Not long ago they were at some community health facility (or something similar) where Catherine held the receptionist's baby. William joked "Oh, no she's going to get broody on me.". You can fault her for a lot of things, but she genuinely seems to enjoy the company of children. Doesn't seem forced at all.

Is Kate trolling for attention? She knows joking about being broody will make headlines, which is normally not something she does. Curious…

R114 - Mantel was crucified for that shallow, tasteless, cruel article, and more than a few people pointed out that Mantel, an ugly woman, was displaying not a particularly veiled resentment of a woman whose fame was based on a distinctly feminine modality.

In the event, Kate has had the last laugh on Mantel. proving herself to be steely, savvy, disciplined, and avoiding the mistakes of her starry dead mother in law and sister in law who was supposedly going to "blow her out of the water".

The reality was that as William's wife and as a representative of the monarchy, Kate's job wasn't to set the world on fire, but to figure out how to have a family, carve out a niche in an extremely difficult environment with little to no privacy, a press always waiting to jump on missteps.

Kate has managed to be herself on her own quiet terms and grown steadily into the role. She's earned the respect of the Queen, the press, and the public.

She blew past Waity Katy, Mantel, Meghan Markle, etc. She's a canny survivor.

Barbie dolls don't handle what Kate has handled so successfully.

Strong women do.

R125 - Oh, yeah, really, hon? Because we all know that if she hadn't said that, there wouldn't have been a single photographer out there in Copenhagen. Oh, it's just so curious! Who would even know that the second most popular royal in Britain was around if she didn't troll for attention?

Try a little harder, Meghan.

[quote] She blew past Waity Katy, Mantel, Meghan Markle, etc. She's a canny survivor. Barbie dolls don't handle what Kate has handled so successfully. Strong women do.

Agree, R126.

The ones who repetitiously bleat that Kate is a Frau-a-Sarus, fail to recognize the strength in the tightrope act Catherine has managed to perfect. During the BRF’s woes, she has managed to shine despite the family being in treacherous waters. And god forbid, she is not royal born! Merely a commoner!

She is akin to an Olympic, expert, figure skater: she makes it look so easy and effortless, when in reality, it is exceedingly difficult.

We know this from observing her American sister-in-law who failed royaling, yet had the background to “hit the ground running”. What a mess Meghan has made of it all.

And to say that Meghan and Kate should not be compared, well, tell that to Meghan. The woman is obsessed with outshining, outperforming and obliterating her sister-in-law. It’s bizarre and pathological. Birthdays, events, public appearances are carefully “curated” by Meghan to coincide or conflict with Catherine’s situations. Even today after being MIA for over 100 days, Meghan released photos of herself via her fave pap outlet - Backgrid - during Catherine’s first foreign event since the pandemic.

[quote]The ones who repetitiously bleat that Kate is a Frau-a-Sarus, fail to recognize the strength in the tightrope act Catherine has managed to perfect.

You're so funny. I bet you believe all of that. no matter what Kate does, the British press give her good press so they can slam Meghan and Harry.

The British press NEVER, EVER miss a chance to slam M & H

Now, I would guess R115 is Meghan, or someone associated with Suits. Who else would have those numbers at their fingertips?

Until Patrick J. Adams left r115 and broke up the Mike/Harvey duo. Also, Gina left too, you remember, the long time head of the firm? There were several comments on the TV Guide online site at the time with people saying how glad they were Meghan was gone because they couldn't stand her and her character.

Making a point of calling Kate "Catherine" is a dead giveaway of mug-cradling stans.

Mantel is a genius and I thought her article was straightforward about things the British press and the royal family likes to try and pussyfoot around.

[quote] Kate has had the last laugh on Mantel

Right, she’s made the cover of the Daily Mail day after day for her coats and her hairdo while Mantel has only written brilliant literature…

R133 Mantel is a successful writer. The DM is who the DM is, and there really isn't any way it won't talk about the clothes the women wear.

But as continues to be the case, you want to ignore the fact that anyone who married William was constrained to discretion, awareness that it was the husband, not her, who mattered, and that her job was to back him up, found the next tranche of the dynasty, and find a way to carve a reasonable path forward in an unremitting and highly critical glare.

She was smart to move slowly, and it's telling that people forget what else she did in the headlines, like the Holocaust survivor photos, the Early Childhood project, and the Hold Still photograph book, which she helped edit and that ended a best seller whose proceeds were split between the National Portrait Gallery and a mental health charity.

You will note that the loud-mouthed feminist in CA is clinging to that archaic title with her fingernails. She wrote a book! And we know how that went

If you and Nantel want to argue against having a monarchy at all, that's fine.

But assuming that Kate isn't shrewd, savvy, and without a thought in her mind or that she isn't doing a job at all is just specious.

It isn't her coats that have put her at the top of the royal popularity polls. It's her ability to demonstrate that she understands that it's not about her, it6about what she represents.

If you and Mantel think it's no indication of either brains or self-agency that the great-granddaughter of a coal miner whose mother was born in a council house is succeeding in this role, hey, there's no point in further discussion.

Kate knows who she is, and she who she isn't. That Mantel and you disdain her for how skillfully she has navigated this mine-field filled terrain whilst having three children in the public eye, tells us more about you two than about Kate.

Catherine, rhymes with “human womb”.

[quote] You're so funny. I bet you believe all of that. no matter what Kate does, the British press give her good press so they can slam Meghan and Harry. The British press NEVER, EVER miss a chance to slam M & H

Bwahahahahahah. No, you are the humorous one, R129. Wrapped in delusions blaming “the press” for the malignant actions of Meghan and Harry.

It’s obvious something is seriously wrong with the duo when they manage to alienate everyone: her family, his family, Hollywood (even Brad Pitt disses them), friends (Ninaki, Tyler Perry, The McPhee-Fosters - the latest details involved inappropriate behaviour with them), work colleagues (Gina Crowne, Oprah), Senators (invading their privacy), the United Nations, Netflix, Spotify, former employees (reports of bullying staff, fleeing nannies, threatened assistants, etc.)

The writing is on the wall with The Harkles.

Oh but, LeT’s BlAmE ThE PrEsS who “can slam them”!

Bwahahahahahah. If you believe that, there’s a nice piece of coastal property in Arizona for sale with your name on it.

I guess we knew that the Harkles/McPhee Foster collaboration wouldn't last. Let me guess, Markle was inappropriately hanging all over Hazza's 'father' Foster, am I right?

Comparing an an anorectic dunce like Kate to a two-time winner of the Booker Prize... you BRF fansters are lunatics.

[quote] That Mantel and you disdain her for how skillfully she has navigated this mine-field filled terrain whilst having three children in the public eye, tells us more about you two than about Kate.

I suggest rereading Mantel’s article if you think the focus of her disdain is Kate, instead of a public that clamors for and rewards a whip-thin and silent head of hair as a cultural figurehead. Kate as image is what she critiques, not Kate as full person, who used to be picked over by the tabloids whenever the machine allowed her to emerge, before the tabloids found a new whipping girl in Meghan.

"You're so funny. I bet you believe all of that. no matter what Kate does, the British press give her good press so they can slam Meghan and Harry. The British press NEVER, EVER miss a chance to slam M & H"

Typical Megaloon rewrite of history. Kate and her family were mercilessly mocked and skewered in the UK press until quite some time.

Meghan was welcomed with enthusiasm with the UK public and most of the press. She was antagonistic to the UK press before they were even engaged.

And everywhere she has gone, she has blown initial goodwill. The Fosters don't hang with her any longer, neither do the Clooneys, Spotify is pissed off at them and so is Netflix, or both of them would have denied the stories.

They keep attacking, making fools of themselves, they lied about the family on television, she perjured herself in court papers, and there's Harry, now suing Her Majesty's government in an attempt to wring more out of the country he abandoned.

The reason Harry and Meghan press has deteriorated down the crapper because of how detestably they have handled themselves.

The reason Kate and William press has soared is because of how they handled themselves.

And no one, ever, has gotten the sort of press meted out to Sarah Ferguson. And she, too, earned it with a big mouth, lack of discretion, and stupidity.

Meghan and Harry are reaping what they sowed by an oppositional stance that they were cultivating the moment they got engaged.

R139, people understood Mantel the first time. She was not simply discussing Kate’s “image.” She criticized her as a person, in unpleasant, specific physical detail. That is why R112 posted the essay; he/she took it as an attack on Kate.

R139 - And I'll state once again that this is exactly the misogyny exhibited: the public isn't hysterical about how thin Kate is, YOU are. Or her hair: YOU are.

And she hasn't been silent - you just haven't been listening.

As "image" she represents exactly what she is: the wife of a future King who cannot engage in political discourse, shoot her mouth off, appear to take partisan sides. But she has spoken frequently on the importance of mutual support, early childhood issues, mental health, and the importance of remembering Holocaust survivors and victims.

She also showed up at the Sarah Everard memorial, making a point without saying a word. What the fuck did you and Mantel think she should be doing? Getting fat? Unkempt hair? To prove she's, what?!

She goes where the Foreign Office sends her, behaves with dignity and grace, and there you and Mantel are, bawling about how she's utterly silent (she isn't), boils down to her hair and figure, and ignore the obvious: her image is exactly what her job is: support, patronage, and an understanding of where she fits in.

By the way, when she released those Holocaust photos (oh, yes, let's forget her actually quite good skills as a photographer which is how she got involved in the HOLD STILL: Britain Under Covid book), Meghan Markle's good friend, Jessica Mulroney, posted a Twitter comment disparaging the photos and saying they didn't "do" anything. As a Jew herself, the backlash was so extensive that the Tweet had to come down and her husband had to come forward and lamely insist that no criticism of the portraits was actually intended. Right.

But Mulroney's criticism isn't so far from what you and Mantel are suggesting: But what does she actually DO?

That article was how long ago? And here you are, insisting that Kate's only image is of a silent, thin, glossy-haired empty vessel.

Instead of a woman demonstrating that she understands what her fucking job is, is doing it gracefully, raising three children, initiating projects like the HOLD STILL book, the Holocaust memorial photos, the Five Under Five project, the mental health issues . . .

To you, no matter WHAT Kate does, she'll still be what Mantel said about her years ago. There really isn't ANYTHING she can do short of inciting a revolt that will persuade you that, actually, her image isn't just her figure and hair.

Because you won't even acknowledge that some time has elapsed since that article and its sneering misogyny, and, amazingly, so has Kate's public persona.

Because you WANT to keep her in the space she occupied in that article.

You keep bringing it up, and for you, no time has gone by since it appeared, and you've ignored Kate's increasing presence on the public stage, and her projects and charities, as her children are getting old enough to allow it.

Senior monarchy figures are under huge constraints and walking through a minefield in which people like you and Mantel and the DM and the MIRROR and The SUN are watching every expression, every word, every gesture.

Diana's hair, beauty, and clothes were also the focus of most of her press in the early years. It wasn't until after Harry was born that Diana began, also, to be somewhat more.

I remember when Harry was born, and the press surrounded the hospital as she left (looking, frankly, as if she wanted to throw that baby at them), one journalist commented, "She seemed to be as she emerged the absolute ideal of young motherhood."

Thanks, I'm sure.

Kate is neither stupid, nor empty-headed, nor silent. And, yeah, she looks great in her clothes and her hair is very pretty.

R101 I was actually joking but you turned it into a whole racist screed.

Meghan is the smart one.

She can see the writing on the wall.

Once the Queen is dead, the royal family will come under intense pressure. The British public might very well demand that the BRF be abolished.

All of Kate's "loyalty" will mean nothing. She will be a "Queen without a kingdom." She and William will be private citizens, having to find actual jobs to support themselves.

Meanwhile, Harry and Meghan have a head start, having established businesses and non-profits that are already up and running.

Then William and Kate will come groveling to Harry and Meghan for help.

That will be fucking DELICIOUS to watch.

R143 - Irony doesn't always travel well in print.

And my response may have fit into the "Never mind . . ." category but it was hardly racist. I only put up the actual information, as there does happen to be some genetic evidence on that score. Ironically, I only found that out because of your post. Perhaps you didn't know it, either. Now, you do.

If you put something like that without indicating it's ironic, you have to expect that sort of response.

Otherwise, apologies, but it isn't the first time that no indication of jest or irony has gotten a serious response.

R145 or, just a thought, you take this BRF stuff way more seriously than it really should be, and it clouds your perceptions.

She is laying eggs?

So at R144 we jump straight from British public might to Kate and William will need real jobs and then have to beg certain others for advice.

You don't earn much for a living, do you?

Why doesn't Kate go to Harry for help if she's feeling broody? He can make her feel upbeat again.

Harry has a bigger dick than William.

This thread needs to make better us of F&F, doesn't it?

Absolutely, R151.

The Kate-stans and Klan Grannies need to be FF'ed into oblivion!

R141 You are a dunce as well. I posted Hilary's brilliant essay - if you thought it was misogynistic, you are the Grand Poobah of the Empire of Dunces. There is no use to discuss what Hilary's concerns were re Kate with someone bereft of the firing of supratentorial neurons.

Need we say again a two-time Booker Prize winner. But obviously far beyond your pay grade.

[quote] Meanwhile, Harry and Meghan have a head start, having established businesses and non-profits that are already up and running. Then William and Kate will come groveling to Harry and Meghan for help. That will be fucking DELICIOUS to watch.

You cannot be serious, R144. This is a joke, no?

Haz has recently filed more lawsuits: The Home Office aka his Grandmother’s government and the Daily Mail because they both reported HE LIED. Haz seems to be upset when the truth is printed, and it doesn’t shine favorably upon him. Otherwise, he and Princess Pinocchio LOVE to have misrepresentations put out among the populace. Omid Scobies’ hagiography, Finding Freedom, their claim that HMTQ was happy about Lili’s name: “recollections may vary”, and ah, yes, the fact that they LIED to a court of law. Yes, it’s all documented. They are liars.

They are complete jokes. Witness their recent statement about the invasion in Ukraine. They are private citizens. What the hell business do they have releasing geopolitical blather? Or accepting NAACP awards when Duke Dolt strolls around with Nazi armbands and their SS (Sunshine Sachs) has arranged for them to pay for an award to a sycophant....so they can further stroll on a Z-level red carpet.

They are truly a parody come to life. Unbelievable.

There is a sadness about Hilary Mantel. But back to Kate, I like her but not her look on the outing with Princess Mary. It's too LONG: long hair, long body, long coat. Her proportions were off. Mary's were just right.

[quote] But back to Kate, I like her but not her look on the outing with Princess Mary. It's too LONG: long hair, long body, long coat. Her proportions were off Mary’s were just right.

Oh, you can’t mean Mary’s facial proportions. They were way off. Too much filler for Fat Face. And shiny.

Give me long hair and slim coat dress any day with Natural Proportions.

Shorter hair and Artifice, Shiny Face only add to a more unnatural and masculine look.

Kate seems like such a wonderful mother.

Catherine posed for a nice picture with Margarethe and Mary, as well as with 7 or 8 of the Danish security personnel who assisted her on the trip (seethe, Harry). She was understated and beautifully dressed, in tune with her hosts.

Kate has lots of help being a mother.

Didn't William just lecture people with the last few years to stop having so many children?

r156, it's easy to appear that way when you're a loaded royal with a staff of servants tasked with doing the heavy lifting of parenting for you.

Correction: r157, it's easy to appear that way when you're a loaded royal with a staff of servants tasked with doing the heavy lifting of parenting for you.

[quote] I guess we knew that the Harkles/McPhee Foster collaboration wouldn't last. Let me guess, Markle was inappropriately hanging all over Hazza's 'father' Foster, am I right?

Yes you are. But it’s an easy guess. Did I say EASY? Let’s spell out the EASY:

David and Katherine McPhee/Foster apparently found Markle’s behavior inappropriate in regards to David. The McPhee/Fosters brought this to the duo’s attention. Haz - being the fellow he is - merely laughed off her actions and ONCE AGAIN put the blame for her inappropriate behavior squarely on someone else: David. According to Haz, Meghan cannot help it if she is so attractive (aside, 🤢) and David is known for his predilection for younger women!

Apparently this set the McPhee/Fosters right off the pair. Attempts at reconciliation by The Harkles included putting out PR that David was “the Dad Harry never had” (can you say, ageism?), or Haz texting them after Lili’s birth to announce she would be a perfect marriage match for their son (what?!)

This has branded The Harkles as gross and supposedly their former friends have been “creeped and weirded out” by them. Spreading this amongst many in musical Hollywood.

Ghastly behavior by the duo is nothing new. Recall Megs - freshly post-partum - flying to the US Open to see Serena Williams play? An opportune photo caught the moment her legs were akimbo enticing Alex Ohanian, Serena’s hubby. Most of those photos have been scrubbed, but a mag posted the photo below which shows the shot of Megs w/o Alex in the frame.

The following, then, should follow like clockwork. This is a copy of a post from reddit that was responding to Meghan Markle being inappropriate with David Foster:

[quote] Expect more of these stories to trickle out over the next weeks/months. My source in Hollywood will kill me if I name names, but that Meghan is looking hard for a richer man is a well-known thing among the “elites”. She’s apparently hurling herself at every rich man she can get close to, including a famous athlete or two, to try to improve her financial situation and tie down the next ex-Mr. Markle.

[quote] Ranks are starting to close even more tightly against the both of them because men are sick of her transparent attempts to nail them down and girlfriends, boyfriends, and wives are even more sick of it. They are moving from being shadow banned from events to more openly being ostracized. The Hollywood A List isn’t politely omitting anymore. They are outright saying” We don’t want you here.” And they’re saying it to and about HER

[quote] Kate seems like such a wonderful mother.

Wrong.

She's a cunt.

Hope you cheer up, Kate!

[quote]Until Patrick J. Adams left [R115] and broke up the Mike/Harvey duo. Also, Gina left too, you remember, the long time head of the firm? There were several comments on the TV Guide online site at the time with people saying how glad they were Meghan was gone because they couldn't stand her and her character. —But you already knew that.

They only left after Meghan left. Gina got her own spin off show. Patrick decided to leave when Meghan was leaving. You may not like that, but it's the truth. And just like i said, YOU AND THE TRUTH ARE COMPLETE STRANGERS. The ratings went down after she left.

And since you mentioned Patrick Adams, he called the royal family's treatment of Meghan, "obscene, shameless and bankrupt of decency". He was right. charles gave his own Mother Covid, after gleefully rubbing his hands over what things of hers he wanted when she died. Which homes he wanted, and who was going to get what and even what his coronation plans were. Truly disgusting and just obscenely greedy.

The facts are that this was a successful show that made a lot of money for the network.

^ You are mentally ill. We may be bitches, but you are totally fucking obsessive-compulsive looney tunes no hope nuts.

Loser.

I found the Mantel essay to have a wandering point and be largely an exercise in the promotion of herself and her [then] latest work. I was quite surprised when she told us what the point was at the end. Being a Booker Prizewinner doesn't mean you can write a good essay.

That said, she was criticising the "universal gaze" directed at Kate (and by extension Diana) more than the actual woman, and saying it makes them into nothing more than graven images that people can project onto. THAT said, it was easy to see that she was far more sympathetic to Diana's "imperfect image" than to Kate's "perfect" one (which she describes in such disapproving terms), so it's unsurprising Kate took offence. The sequence where Mantel was at Buckingham Palace and gawped at the Queen to the point where HM got defensive suggests Mantel is a very peculiar person.

Get some sleep, Meghan. R50

Oh, dear r165 is going to have to eat his words. How embarrassing for you.

Gina's spinoff was announced on February 22, 2017. It had been discussed for a year and a half prior to the announcement r165. You really have egg all over you face dear.

We need Kate to have 25 future kids. Her vagina needs to crown more till its as big as the throne.

Kids are a huge responsability.

You can't just look at a small kid, find him cute and decide you want kids.

You can if you have a retinue of highly trained servants, R172.

What was Meg trying to accomplish by opening her legs and flashing Serena's husband? Does she seriously think she's so irresistible that a quick peek of her sagging camel toe between her stick legs will ensnare any man alive? Harry is too fucking stupid to realize that he should be offended and embarrassed by her behavior.

I suspect Megs would like nothing more than to be the center of some scandal where she's able to entice some billionaire away from his wife. Endless media coverage for years like Brad/Angie/Jen and she could further play the victim crying about how she's being portrayed as the aggressor when she just has no control over how enticing she is.

Harry would of course sue for Alienation of Affection.

Wow, even in a thread about Duchess of Doolittle Meghan takes center stage. She has free rent in you trolls’ heads, doesn’t she?

[quote] She has free rent in you trolls’ heads, doesn’t she?

Western society hasn’t seen such a grifting, lying, narcissistic, bullying, duplicitous, fat, evil woman in a while.

She’s weighty (backfat) meat for discussion.

She keeps on entertaining.

Thanks for proving me right r177.

[quote]Didn't William just lecture people with the last few years to stop having so many children?

Do you really think William would run around telling people how to live their best lives?

William has three children and an expense account to provide for them. And tons of household staff to raise them. He should just stop talking just like Harry should.

William said nothing of the sort. There's nothing for him to stop talking about with respect to how many children people should have. That's politics and policy.

William understands the difference.

They have announced they stand with the people of Ukraine.

You can imagine how that's going over.

Someone needs to teach them the difference between show and tell. If they did they might make a difference rather than prompting a laugh.

It's actually a very political statement. But I guess when you're not using your titles....

Here's how it can be done within bounds.

She doesn't seem to be brooding over anything - at several recent events she was smiling a lot.

Getting nostalgic when you see a cute baby doesn't mean you're going to run out and have another. Plenty of parents feel that momentary tug when they see a cute baby.

R185 - “broody” and “brooding” are not the same thing.

R185, broody means that she wants more crotchfruit.

What's the story on the bust ups with Karen from Smash and her grandfather?

What a strange person you are r178.

I like Hilary Mantel's books but have you seen her? She's ugly as shit and looks like a gnome. That has to affect her views on attractive women.

Homely women often tear down attractive women. See how Meghan treats Kate.

Women like Meghan who earn their own money often tear down women like Kate who have never been employed and are dependent on their husband for every penny.

Klan Granny is used a lot on twitter since Christopher Bousy said it was a great nickname.

Bouzy not Bousy.

What's so amusing about these folks like an admitted "Sussex Squad" member posted at r195 is that they hold themselves up as examples of impervious stupidity just by creating their own echo chamber.

It's another "Q" type of universe populated by girls of bad shapes, off sizes, and splotchiness in complexion regardless of race or form who, despite low achievements or no accomplishments and unattractive faces, dream that they could bag a Prince at their unmarriageable stations or ages. It's a fucking cottage industry. Markle could become the new woke and biracial Barbara Cartland fulfilling her husband's mother's step-mother's romance novelist mother! (Whew! I hope I got the relationship right)

This is the most relatable Kate has ever been to DL with her declaration. Gurls, what she is saying in no uncertain terms is that she wants to be bred by Will, for his thick cock to blow a huge royal load balls deep in her snatch. That's all I want too. I want Wills spunk in my mussy. Kate is horny. That's so hot to tell people you want to be bred. I think I might say I am "feeling broody" when I am out and about.

Meghan is the shadow, Kate is the sun.

It's hilarious that a reaction common as dirt amongst Mums wistfully noting that they'll never have a really little one in their arms again should get a thread opened on DL, assumptions that it means that a 40 year old mother of three for whom a greatly extended public schedule is necessary is planning to have a 4th in the middle of all this . . .

The royals like film stars are the world's greatest Rorshach tests: projection screens onto which everone projects something different.

A casual throwaway remark that as noted is common and totally anodyne, from a public figure on a visit to a foreign country to explore early childhood issues . . . and DL is on it like a terrier down a rathole.

You couldn't make it up.

The anti MM trolls like to try and gaslight her defenders, accusing them of being crazy and deluded when the opposite is true.

We're not anti-MM, we're anti-you, moron.

r196 Step Grandmother. Barbara Cartland died in 2000 aged 98. Raine Spencer her step mother died in 2016 in her eighties.

Gaslighting r201. That’s why you’re resorting to name calling. You’re a cornered rat.

LOL... yes, by the likes of you, R203. Your ignorant fantasies are boundless.

Every ridiculous response you make to my posts proves me right r204. I thank you.

Oh, the I'm rubber and you're glue variant. Well, viruses mutate.

Here's what's gonna happen, hon. We're going to F&F you on this thread until the desired effect kicks in. So get your licks in now, you're about to be come even less relevant than you already are.

You have a good day. And don't forget your hairnet when you to your job.

R73- Reese Witherspoon has actually NEVER had nannies. Google it.

So at the height of her career Reese had no nannies and schleeped her three kids at various ages, infants, toddlers, pre-schoolers, to work with her and solely cared for them on movies sets herself? Just handed them to a nearby P.A. when she needed to step on camera? LOL. GMAFB.

^^^^*schlepped*

Because that’s what you do r207. And you are proud of it. It’s so sad, the obsession with bullying those who don’t follow your lead. Good luck with the rest of your life. Wow.

R210 is meant for r206, sorry. Not that it matters as I have blocked them.

R193 seems oblivious to the fact that outside of her seven years on Suits, that Meghan lived entirely off of men. Neither Meghan, nor her mother for that matter, have any type of long-term established work history. Catherine had a job too moron. Sounds like you're jealous that she comes from significant wealth.

I’m glad both Harry & Meghan and William & Kate spoke out for Ukraine, every bit helps.

Today at football (UK), the teams were wearing Ukrainian flag colors. Remains to be seen what will happen with Abramovich's Chelsea. He transferred ownership to the trustees today for fear Chelsea would be bankrupted.

I like Reese and appreciate the empire she’s built, but there’s no fucking way she didn’t have Nannie’s.

The UK tabloids are harming the brf. This is trending. Both articles can be found as of now on the website. It blatantly shows the invisible contract at work.

It's laughable for anyone to expect anything but derision of those two by the Mail. They're perpetually in court. Duh.

The Royal Family is not harmed by the tabloids. The only person more unpopular than those two in the last poll was Prince Andrew. They're an international joke now.

Every gig Megs had was handed to her by a man.

Yeah, Reese had nannies. And huge NDAs. She was cruel to those nannies (hence the huge NDAs).

But here is one tip, she collected their personal cell phones at the beginning of the day and did not return them until they were walking out the door at night.*

Meg did nothing in those "working actress" years but spend her money on self promotion. Oh. and searching for her next meal ticket.

[quote] What's so amusing about these folks like an admitted "Sussex Squad" member posted at [R195] is that they hold themselves up as examples of impervious stupidity just by creating their own echo chamber.

[quote] [bold]It's another "Q" type of universe populated by girls of bad shapes, off sizes, and splotchiness in complexion regardless of race or form who, despite low achievements or no accomplishments and unattractive faces, dream that they could bag a Prince at their unmarriageable stations or ages. [/bold]It's a fucking cottage industry. Markle could become the new woke and biracial Barbara Cartland fulfilling her husband's mother's step-mother's romance novelist mother!

In order to deny, ignore, or accept all the malignant behaviour exhibited by Haz and Megs, the people who support them are of the Q cult mindset. You’ve identified them well, R196. Women of a certain (poor) stature and standing. Some people of colour who buy into Meghan’s sudden interest in POC (after years of surrounding herself with non-POC, straightening her “ethnic” hair, and changing her features to those of Caucasians), and certain gay men in the manner of Omid Scobie.

A rather non-discerning - or some might call, delusional - group.

R217 The contract is you don't make personal statements using your titles to make what you say important.

The Harkles emblazoned their fucking ducal titles on the statement.

Kate and William only signed their initials to make it clear they weren't speaking for the monarchym

If the Sussexes wanted to be treated like the Cambridges, perhaps they should have BEHAVED MORE LIKE THE CAMBRIDGES.

You catch more flies with honey than vinegar, dear.

Remember the Oprah interview?

R313 you diminish yourself and your posts when you allow your hatred of Meghan to cause you to try to diminish her achievements to nothing.

It's like how the trans shriek about JK Rowling now "her writing isn't even any good, and she's racist and right wing and a Nazi! She's an awful, untalented person!" because she dared go against their gender dogma (and completely untrue, as she is a liberal feminist, her causes and the money she raises and donates to do good works, etc.)

That's how you know it's an emotional reaction. You look at Meghan and see a grifting avaricious gold digger, when if you were actually being reasonable you'd admit she has done some good, and is trying to do more good through Archewell and the various initiatives underway. She even donated the $$ compensation she got from the Mail on Sunday for charity.

But to you, every decision she makes, every thing she has done or will do is done from a place of greed or malice. Just like the trans see JK Rowling now. Her good works are ACTUALLY to enrich herself or to spread evil in some way! The money she's donated, why hasn't she donated it ALL, if she's so good?? etc. Etc.

Addendum to my post at r225: just say you hate her and don't try to find some justification for it, because the emotional reaction you have to her is not logical or justified. I know you probably consider yourself a good person and so you don't want to admit you despise her at a visceral level that is disconnected from anything she's actually done, but that is what it looks like every time you post something like you do in your posts about the Sussexes.

Just admit it and stop trying to justify your hatred, it's transparently obvious what you are really thinking.

R313 seems to be posting in the future.

R226, seriously, why are you so invested in fighting her corner? That's a lot of words for one person. I'm asking from genuine curiosity.

Over 200 likes on a post calling out Meghan obsessives by their given name of KLAN GRANNIES!

200 likes in a world of 7 billion people. How will the British royal family withstand his groundswell?

Whores like R230 swore that the name Klan Grannies would never go beyond DL because it wasn't funny or catchy enough. But since Christopher Bouzy okayed it all the pro MM people are using it!

None of this is going to make the Harkles more popular or likable. They've been reduced to purchasing awards for themselves and grainy pap photos that no one but TMZ posted. This NAACP stunt is beyond sad. No red carpet, no audience, walking out from behind a screen with H looking miserable and henpecked. I'd feel sorry for them if they weren't such horrible people. Their small Q-cult is even more pathetic. You know Megsy hates that these psychos are her fan base.

LOL! Someone just called her "this bitch and her handbag!"

R232 is a known Qanon member, like most Klan Grannies. Check out all the conspiracies the silly bitch believes in - 'buying awards' for instance.

1,175 likes! Sorry, little KGT.

All the Klan Grannies can manage are weak names like Harkles, Sparkle, Megsy, Ginge etc. None of them have caught on.

So just like Harry and Meghan then r236.

If you watch the sad video of the Harkles accepting their award, turn up the volume and you will hear Smeg queef when she's talking about CA being her home state.

R225 Since her primary achievements seem to have been attempting to publicly destroy the family that put her on the map, for which aim she told a packet of porkies, perjured herself in sworn court papers, regularly as clockwork tries to upstage other members of that family, and that her little bits of "doing some good" are vastly overrated, only get PR because of her title, just the way her only decent acting job was obtained because of who she married, and that reports of her dismal treatment of people have followed her everywhere since she grabbed the gold matrimonial ring . . .

I'd say that her glaring self-regard and intense unlikability, hypocrisy, and hard-arsed opportunism far outweigh her bits of philanthropic grandstanding - for which only the title she married gets her any scope.

Did we forget that absolutely dreadful book she wrote? The one that flopped so badly and whose spine, instead of being imprinted as usual with the title of the book and the author's name to the side, only has MEGHAN, THE DUCHESS OF SUSSEX taking up the whole spine in huge letters?

She's a horrible person. And she and her husband having thrown their toys out of the pram and flounced out and put the boot into his grieving 95 year old Gran whilst her husband was dying, living in a $14 million house that they bought from one if those horrible Russian oligarchs, are still trying to get people who will never live like that to shell out more money for them even though they don't live in the UK, he stands no more chance of being King than you do, and have spent the last two years trashing the family who were stupid enough to let her in.

She's never in her life been about anything but herself. Her bits of "good work" are window dressing.

The only person you're fooling is yourself.

Wow, R239, what an obsessed little Meghan fangirl you are! Keeping up with everything she does, all these years after she's left the BRF. You're a monomaniac.

All these two years? Hardly eternity, though I admit it feels like it.

Just remember, use your F&F every day.

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Daddy was photographed today taking me to an ACTUAL pizza parlour.

I bet Kate is only claiming she's broody to terrify Harry he's going down to No. 7 - or No. 8 if she has twins.

R245 - Nah, that's who Kate really is.

And she has miserable first trimesters, And she's 40, And Louis is finally almost four.

Another Cambridge baby is neither desired nor expected. Kate has never made a secret of how much she loves children, though, and her charitable causes bear that out. Sports and kids are her bailiwicks within the BRF.

They might adopt a baby though the baby wouldn't be in the line of succession.

That's never going to happen.

R248 What planet did you arrive from yesterday?

The only point to Kate having another child would be to push Harry and his offspring one notch farther back.

She doesn't need another kid and the likelihood of her adopting one is so off the wall it borders lunacy.

She's got the 3 children she said she always wanted. Her husband is teetering on the edge of Prince of Walesdom, and the next one up is pushing into his mid-70s and a surprise from Mother Nature can't be ruled out.

They are as likely to adopt a kid as I am to be selected as the next 007.

lol, r250 and so true.

Kate must be looking forward to turning 50, when people will finally stop speculating about the state of her womb and start wondering about when her kids are going to get married.

Kate doesn’t eat second-hand clothes, and she won’t have a second-hand kid!

What?

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

I wonder if George smelled the cookies?