Sharon Stone in "Casino"
She really was the standout of this film, and it's some of her best work (such as it is). But I'm amazed at how many "serious film people" have never seen Casino. They're all over Goodfellas, Raging Bull, The Departed, etc. But so many people never bothered to see Casino. I figure it's like Tarantino's Jackie Brown. It's a great movie on its own, but only 90% as iconic as its predecessor, so it gets unfairly overshadowed.
Sharon Stone expertly plays a gold-digging casino hustler turned mob wife, who is never fully trusted or trustworthy by the gangsters around here. She yells. She sleeps around. She shoots heroin. But mostly, she just looks good in jewels and furs.
"For Ginger, love costs money."
Offsite Linkby Anonymous | reply 58 | February 6, 2022 4:35 PM
|
Oh Sharon, please go do a bong hit and chill.
by Anonymous | reply 1 | February 5, 2022 1:28 AM
|
And to think Madonna was "considered" for the role of Ginger
šššš²šš
by Anonymous | reply 2 | February 5, 2022 1:30 AM
|
Traci Lords auditioned for the role.
by Anonymous | reply 3 | February 5, 2022 1:31 AM
|
[quote] But mostly, she just looks good in jewels and furs.
I just watched Casino during a long cooking project at my house. I've seen it several times and it's one of the few movies that I own a copy of.
Reason for non-acclaim (Stone & a lot of other contributors to the movie): It's too fucking long and it's a rehash of earlier Scorcese movies. (Even the soundtrack had repeat song: Sympathy for the Devil.)
As I was watching it during this past cooking session, I could pick out actual scenes that could have been cut. The point was made, already.
Sharon looked absolutely beautiful in the first maybe 1/3rd of the movie and horrible in the remaining part with her dried-up Carol Brady wig. Sharon has a good figure, but is a little bit thick in the middle with small chest. You have to dress her accordingly. Some of the outfits were not very flattering to her figure.
by Anonymous | reply 4 | February 5, 2022 1:35 AM
|
I loved Casino and thought Sharon Stone was awesome in it.
by Anonymous | reply 5 | February 5, 2022 2:59 AM
|
It becomes a series of over-the-top showdowns and is too long.
by Anonymous | reply 6 | February 5, 2022 3:04 AM
|
Ooooooh, and look, Robert DeNiro playing.....himself again always. ;)
by Anonymous | reply 7 | February 5, 2022 3:07 AM
|
Sharon has said she was Ginger McKenna when she was in her early 20's, she had her issues with addiction and promiscuity.
by Anonymous | reply 8 | February 5, 2022 3:19 AM
|
I thought she was amazing in this. She was styled brilliantly too.
by Anonymous | reply 9 | February 5, 2022 3:59 AM
|
Looking back on it now, I wish Sharon should've walked away with the Oscar, instead of Sob Sister Sarandon.
by Anonymous | reply 10 | February 5, 2022 4:22 AM
|
[R10] Stone wasn't up against Sarandon for the AA.
Twit.
by Anonymous | reply 12 | February 5, 2022 4:51 AM
|
^Didn't Sarandon win for Dead Man Walking that year?? (With Stone competing as Ginger McKenna?)
Cunt.
by Anonymous | reply 13 | February 5, 2022 4:58 AM
|
SS was nominated for Supporting Actress, not Best.
Huuunn.
by Anonymous | reply 14 | February 5, 2022 5:08 AM
|
even if that's true, I'm still pretty sure you're a cunt.
Wasn't that the year Mira Sorvino "happened"?
by Anonymous | reply 15 | February 5, 2022 5:16 AM
|
R14 quit while you're behind: both Sarandon and Stone were nominated for Best Actress with Sarandon winning for Dead Man Walking.
by Anonymous | reply 16 | February 5, 2022 5:17 AM
|
Thanks OP for dropping that, itās been a while since Iāve seen it with all the Fucks left intact,
Maybe this movie is just too entertaining to be considered āgreat.ā
by Anonymous | reply 18 | February 5, 2022 5:27 AM
|
As others have said, while Sharon Stone nailed the part and looked gorgeous in it, it is way too long and a rehash of other Scorsese movies. Not his best unfortunately.
by Anonymous | reply 19 | February 5, 2022 5:31 AM
|
She was superb. And it was very realistic: my mother screamed at my father in the same way when they were getting divorced.
by Anonymous | reply 21 | February 5, 2022 6:09 AM
|
[quote]SS was nominated for Supporting Actress, not Best.
[quote]Huuunn.
No she wasn't. SS was nominated for Best Actress.
Cuuunnt.
by Anonymous | reply 23 | February 5, 2022 5:25 PM
|
I thought she was good when she sat in the casino looing gorgeous. The minute Sharon opened her mouth it all went downhill for me. Her screechy performance was a combination of simpleton writing and her not having enough know how to make the role more multidimensional. Lorraine Bracco was more nuanced in Goodfellas, and she's extremely limited. For the life of me I do not understand why people consider over the top crying, yelling, red in the face over acting "good."
As had been said, as a movie, Casino is waaaay too long and is only partially successful. I enjoyed De Niro's performance as the Jew, he left some of the usual swagger saved for Italian characters at the door. Everything else is half cooked Goodfellas shit.
by Anonymous | reply 24 | February 5, 2022 6:11 PM
|
[quote]Sharon has a good figure, but is a little bit thick in the middle with small chest.
That's the way normal thin women look. Perhaps you're too used to seeing surgically altered ones.
by Anonymous | reply 25 | February 5, 2022 6:29 PM
|
Another tired variation of a theme ginzo movie by Scorcese. Does he know how to make films about anything else? Oh, I forgot about the leaden and uninvolving Age of Innocence.
by Anonymous | reply 26 | February 5, 2022 6:39 PM
|
Sharon is a true STAH! No amount of (mostly) shitty movies she made can change that fact!
by Anonymous | reply 27 | February 5, 2022 6:58 PM
|
Terrific film. I always felt Michelle Pfeiffer not only would have been better in the role, she might have won an Oscar for it. Though Stone did have a sort of blowsy quality that worked.
by Anonymous | reply 28 | February 5, 2022 7:00 PM
|
[quote] Ooooooh, and look, Robert DeNiro playing.....himself again always
The son of downtown NYC artists who grew up knowing Jackson Pollock but anyway.
by Anonymous | reply 29 | February 5, 2022 7:11 PM
|
[quote] Lorraine Bracco was more nuanced in Goodfellas, and she's extremely limited
I disagree, but ouch!
by Anonymous | reply 30 | February 5, 2022 7:12 PM
|
[quote] She was superb. And it was very realistic: my mother screamed at my father in the same way when they were getting divorced.
The fighting / arguing scenes between Stone and DeNiro were interminable, but very realistic, IMO.
by Anonymous | reply 31 | February 5, 2022 7:13 PM
|
This was a horrible wig / horrible hairstyle
Offsite Linkby Anonymous | reply 32 | February 5, 2022 7:17 PM
|
[quote] The fighting / arguing scenes between Stone and DeNiro were interminable, but very realistic, IMO.
I concur. They are some of the better domestic screaming matches in movies, if you come from a household where people yell.
Also see Husbands and Wives, Shoot The Moon and Ordinary People.
by Anonymous | reply 33 | February 5, 2022 7:22 PM
|
Joe Pesci had an obvious eye lift done shortly before Casino. It was kind of shocking to look at him in Casino.
Also, on rewatch, too much narration (telling, not showing). I enjoyed the Ace / DeNiro narration where he was explaining the chain of checks & balances in the Casino (to avoid rip-offs), etc. However, in general, that type of narration is a cheap device, to be avoided, IMO.
Pesci's narration was unnecessary. At some point, Frank Vincent (Pesci's right hand) started narrating as well. Too much!
For a 3-hour movie, you shouldn't have needed that much narration.
Offsite Linkby Anonymous | reply 34 | February 5, 2022 7:23 PM
|
R32 and yet it continued to live long in the shorty commuter suburb I was raised in well into the early 2000s.
by Anonymous | reply 35 | February 5, 2022 7:23 PM
|
R4- You mean her RATTY KOREAN WIG
by Anonymous | reply 36 | February 5, 2022 7:52 PM
|
Sharon Stone once gifted her dork husband with a private trip to the zoo, and he ended up having a toe bitten off by a komodo dragon or something.
"Mensa member," my ass!
by Anonymous | reply 37 | February 5, 2022 8:39 PM
|
To me, Sharon is able to come off as harder and more mercenary than Michelle Pfeiffer so I thought she was perfect in this role.
by Anonymous | reply 38 | February 5, 2022 8:53 PM
|
Michelle Pfeiffer already played a gangster's moll in "Scarface," and she was bored out of her tits.
Sharon Stone plays a more natural/believable lunatic, because she's already there in her actual life. She doesn't have to act.
by Anonymous | reply 39 | February 5, 2022 8:55 PM
|
[quote]Joe Pesci had an obvious eye lift done shortly before Casino.
R34, Pesci had a full facelift to go with his wig before the filming of Goodfellas.
by Anonymous | reply 41 | February 5, 2022 9:38 PM
|
Itās another well made compelling wise guy film like Goodfellows, and sheās terrific in it. She was great in Basic Instinct too.
by Anonymous | reply 42 | February 5, 2022 9:44 PM
|
Funny Fact: Joe Pesci was once a hairdresser.
Hairdressers aren't funny, but Pesci as a hairdresser is.
by Anonymous | reply 43 | February 5, 2022 9:50 PM
|
I AM CALM!!!!! Sharon was great.
by Anonymous | reply 44 | February 5, 2022 10:16 PM
|
As for as acting talent goes, Rickles wiped the floor with her.
by Anonymous | reply 45 | February 5, 2022 10:31 PM
|
Don Rickles was great in that. He played it just right. Frank Vincent (Phil Leotardo in Sopranos) as well.
by Anonymous | reply 46 | February 5, 2022 10:38 PM
|
SS said in an interview that Scorcese seemed to want her as window dressing, and didn't include her in talks about character, scenes, etc. She begged him to be treated like a professional and he relented, thus we have the performance we're still talking about.
by Anonymous | reply 47 | February 5, 2022 10:45 PM
|
^ Scorcese knew the score, Sharon was LOUSY.
by Anonymous | reply 48 | February 5, 2022 11:07 PM
|
SS is good, but Joe Pesci is a standout in this film.
by Anonymous | reply 49 | February 5, 2022 11:10 PM
|
Sharon Stone was excellent in this, but agree that her speaking voice is lacking. Not a "screeching" voice but tinny and thin. Not as bad as Madonna, but in that vein.
by Anonymous | reply 51 | February 5, 2022 11:25 PM
|
R51 interesting I think just the opposite - Pfeiffer is the better actress but she has a rather whiny, nasal speaking voice she often sounds like she has a cold. Stone has much more commanding and ātrained soundingā speaking voice. I love it personally.
by Anonymous | reply 52 | February 6, 2022 1:20 AM
|
Did we decide if SS should have won the Oscar instead of SS that year?
by Anonymous | reply 54 | February 6, 2022 5:45 AM
|
R47, Scorsese loves beautiful blondes and they visually elevate his films, but they're never excellent in their roles, giving cartoonish or amateurish performances: Cybill Shepherd, Cathy Moriarty, Michelle Pfeiffer, Sharon Stone, Cameron Diaz, Margot Robbie.
Maybe he doesn't direct women well?
by Anonymous | reply 55 | February 6, 2022 10:37 AM
|
I would say the roles arenāt as meaty as the men's. But he tends to make movies about about boys' clubs, told from the point of view of men. And, fwiw, I would not included Pfeiffer and Moriarty on that list. They were terrific. As was Bracco in Goodfellas, of course.
by Anonymous | reply 56 | February 6, 2022 12:10 PM
|
I love Stone in Casino, but the movie's too long and too much of it is a re-tred of earlier, better Scorsese material.
Of the actresses nominated for Best Actress that year, I though that Elisabeth Shue is Leaving Las Vegas gave the strongest performance, but the not nominated Nicole Kidmam really should have won for To Die For. I have no problem with Sarandon winning though.
by Anonymous | reply 57 | February 6, 2022 1:49 PM
|
I love her as the evil robot wife in "Total Recall", the western "The Quick And The Dead" and the remake of "Diabolique".
Offsite Linkby Anonymous | reply 58 | February 6, 2022 4:35 PM
|