Tom Holland is the new face of Prada

Looks great to me.

I'm so sick of hearing about this boring little nothing.

Well, he only made $10mm for Spider-man No Way Home compared to Maguire's $15mm for his third Spidey movie PLUS Maguire also got 7.5%.

Holland is making pennies compared to other big name Marvel actors, so he needs to be pushing merch.

Hemsworth made $15mm for the last Thor (Hemsworth's third solo) and will get $20mm for the next one.

He is simply too small to pull of these clothes. I’m short myself so I’m not hating… but you can’t pull off big baggy clothes like these and not look childish.

R3 He probably is getting a percentage of the box office.

$10 million isn’t coins.

And Maguire was far more prolific in the role. It was a different time and era. He was the first massive superhero movie.

Yes already a thread, dumbass

Christopher Reeves says “WHAT!”

On some talk show they said he was 5'7".

Yes. He’s very short and it’s obvious.

[quote] Yes. He’s very short and it’s obvious.

As he should be, especially in the MCU. Spider-Man is usually depicted as shorter than most other superheroes.

[quote] I'm so sick of hearing about this boring little nothing

Oh please. He’s good looking, has a KILLER body, and is charming and effective in his role. There’s about a hundred other celebrities more qualified than him in the ‘boring little nothing’ pagent.

R7 yeah, the one you made after seeing this one. Like you continuously do to threads here, Dumbass.

The second photo is pitiful

He's welcome to sit on my face.

Remember back in the day the days of the covers of GQ magazine, male calendar models and male strippers had to be actually gorgeous and handsome in the face!?!

Jake + Tom = Prada couple?

He's cute and looks nice. No complaints. I find his simple boy next door wholesomeness refreshing.

He isn’t good looking at all R11. Standards have fallen so fucking low.

People need to get a life instead of getting triggered by magazine cover models.

He looks great.

He’s sexy enough to me.

Prada looks like shit and is overpriced even by Prada standards. $2000 for a pair of nylon pants is unreal.

He's better looking than Tobey who is unattractive and Andrew who is dorky. He also actually looked like a teenager thus more appropriate for the role of Peter Parker as opposed to the other two who like grad students.

R23 disagree

Even as a kid, I always thought Tobey was ugly and looked 10 years older than his character which he was. James Franco was better looking as Harry. Andrew Garfield was cute but nothing special and he also looked too old to be in high school.

He should be the face of the inside of a paper bag. I want to say to his fan girls what Homer Simpson once sarcastically said to a rice cake: "Hello? Taste? Where are you?!"

R25 James Franco was SUPPOSED to be better looking as Harry. It’s literally part of his character in the film

Tom is conventionally attractive. I'm confused as to why people are saying he's ugly or unworthy of being famous. He just doesn't look like a cartoon character with tons of plastic surgery and pumped up on steroids. He looks more like he belongs in an 80s teen film set in Chicago.

Exactly, R27. Harry was supposed to be handsome, smart, rich--to seemingly have it all. Yet he was miserable.

I feel like like a1970's parent trying to understand their kids' crushes (Leif Garrett, Mark Hamill, David Cassidy), when they were spoiled by the likes of Montgomery Clift, Ricky Nelson, and Tab Hunter.

I came of age in the 1990's--an era where JFK Jr, Denzel Washington, and an array of male supermodels reigned supreme. To go from that to a short man with no lips and the body of a 12-year-old boy is depressing. However, I do recognize tastes change and Tom Holland is the modern day ideal for some inexplicable reason.

Still, the popularity of Jacob Elordi gives me hope that brighter days are ahead! He's hope and change wrapped up in 6'5" and190 lbs of pure sexiness.

^ at your age, there's no brighter days ahead...

Spiderman is famous; Tom Holland isn't famous. But good on him for maximizing his time in the spotlight.

I think he needs to do something with his career and show range. I think he tried with those two films-one called Cherry- but they didn't land at all. Will uncharted be it? It might be a hit but I dont think it looks great. Zendeya's career seems more focussed on longevity.

While his attempts at showing his range tend to crash and burn, an action/adventure movie starring him and Mark Wahlberg is almost guaranteed to be a money printing machine...especially since it will be released in "Dumpuary" (February..the Special Olympics of the box office...when even a bad film can beat its equally inferior competitors if it has more stars).

I was just about to say Uncharted may do fine but it’s because it has Wahlberg too

Which begs the question…WHY?

OP moonface Ewwdwin M. from Brooklyn what do you know about fashion? You use paper plates and buy all of your XXXXXL shirts at Ross dress for less.