Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Prince William Had ‘Cyber Relationships’ with Lauren Bush and Britney Spears Years Ago

Lmaoooooo at Britney shutting him down.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 49December 6, 2021 8:20 PM

Oh, wow. Years ago, eh? Fascinating, OP. Simply fucking fascinating. Tell Meghan we all wish her well and we look forward to her disintegration. Oh, and tell the cunt her campaign to damage the Monarchy is losing its grip. Just like she's losing her grip on the red haired muppet she married. We want neither of them. We never did.

by Anonymousreply 1December 2, 2021 8:04 PM

Haha I have a feeling the BBC is behind all of this.

And I love it!

The story about Queen Elizabeth kicking out Barack Obama, this story about William getting rejected. It's fucking hilarious!

This belongs in the BBC is coming for the BRF thread.

by Anonymousreply 2December 2, 2021 8:24 PM

I need to see his dick pics!

by Anonymousreply 3December 2, 2021 8:44 PM

BBC is coming for the BRF!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 4December 2, 2021 8:59 PM

R2, what will they reveal next? “OMG the Duchess of Cambridge sleeps with the lights on!”

by Anonymousreply 5December 2, 2021 9:10 PM

Britney actually spoke about this like 20 years ago.

by Anonymousreply 6December 2, 2021 9:13 PM

[quote] what will they reveal next? “OMG the Duchess of Cambridge sleeps with the lights on!”

No, but she does chain smoke and puke up anything she eats.

If we're lucky, they'll catch old HATCHET FACE without any make up on.

That would be delicious!

by Anonymousreply 7December 2, 2021 9:13 PM

We have witnessed the royal penis before R3

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 8December 2, 2021 10:06 PM

R7 is projecting, well, apart from being 400 lbs herself.

by Anonymousreply 9December 2, 2021 10:07 PM

The Meghan fanatics are in a mood today. Very few care about any members of the BRF here, but we care even less about Meghan and her ginger pet.

by Anonymousreply 10December 2, 2021 10:13 PM

It’s a warning shot they have more information on much more current and juicy affairs but they are staying quiet for now. It’s the same as all of the sly references to Mrs Parker Bowles close friend and confidant of the Prince of Wales back in the day . Only difference is Kate would never out Wills as a cheater.

by Anonymousreply 11December 2, 2021 10:24 PM

R11, it's a pathetic warning shot, if so: a "JustJared" post about things that happened decades ago? All of this is clearly coming from a California couple, who are perpetually angry about something, and eager to demonstrate that there's no one that they would not attack or betray.

by Anonymousreply 12December 2, 2021 10:27 PM

[quote] Only difference is Kate would never out Wills as a cheater

Someone did

by Anonymousreply 13December 2, 2021 10:35 PM

R1 Dear I’m sorry to tell you but you are not the Queen, you are no one to not want Meghan or anyone in the royal family. Literally no one.

by Anonymousreply 14December 2, 2021 10:45 PM

The American author of this book knows jack shit about anything to do with the Royal family. He's a 'royal observer for Americans'. None of the British media has ever heard of this guy. Like that fat chick at Buzzfeed who thinks she's a royal authority because "I've been interested in the royal family for years".

by Anonymousreply 15December 2, 2021 10:48 PM

Harry and Meghan must be loving this!

You just know that they're drinking in every delicious drop of gossip about William the Boring.

by Anonymousreply 16December 2, 2021 10:54 PM

This is a good time to remind you that the Duchess of Sussex lets me fuck myself with the heels of her pumps after she wears them the first and only time, and I shall NOT be ignored.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 17December 2, 2021 10:58 PM

R16, of course they are. They are “humanitarians” who care deeply about “kindness.”

by Anonymousreply 18December 2, 2021 11:04 PM

What is Ginger's and the sociopath's end game? They may be one of the causes of the collapse of the BRF, but then their titles mean less than nothing. They have no skills, are not interesting beyond their constant complaining about the press and BRF, and even the fanatic Meghan supporters will eventually get bored. What happens then? Does she run for office? She's cold and unappealing to most, and obviously she has no experience or knowledge (not that this has gotten in anyone's way in the last 6 years). I can't imagine that Meghan would be elected to any political office.

by Anonymousreply 19December 2, 2021 11:30 PM

R19, I don’t think that they have an end game beyond lashing out and hurting people. They were given two huge platforms with Netflix and Spotify and proceeded to do absolutely nothing with them. They had relationships with incredibly wealthy people—the Queen and Charles—and responded by alienating both them and William, who will eventually inherit his father’s fortune. None of that makes any sense.

by Anonymousreply 20December 2, 2021 11:41 PM

I don't think Meghan understands that it's not the newspapers that are making people dislike her, it's things like that statement she released after the verdict. You could feel the slimy narcissistic euphoria pouring off the page. It's legitimately freaky how absolutely delusional she is. And she thinks this is a win, despite the fact that soooooo much dirty laundry came out. Her sister's three baby daddies. Meghan's strange Unabomber writing methods with numbered pages and dangling sentences. The lies to the court. Harry saying "it cant look like we were involved." It's a Jerry Springer show. There's no dignity in this. But she's cackling away...over a privacy issue...for a letter that didn't even contain her private thoughts but was a narrative written for public consumption. I guess I can't blame her for having contempt for authority when she so easily manipulates the rules and truth to outsmart it. But this wasn't the win she thinks and that Jesus on the Mount victory sermon diminished that win even more.

Not that any criticism or public backlash will ever seep into Meghan's mind and make her reconsider her course. I think sudden global fame and the critique that came with it has done a number on her mind and since she was never grounded enough before the fame, she won't ever be truly stable again after it. Poor Harry. Poor kids. She's broken.

by Anonymousreply 21December 3, 2021 6:04 AM

I don't think this is the BBC. I think it's frantic attempts by Meghan's PR to try to deflect that the court case she just won outed her as a perjurer.

The DM, however, there are several articles up about the impact of this case on a free press.

And, it also has to be pointed out that where the royals are concerned, when the atra gets saturated with one, they start on another.

The fact that they had to reach back this far tells you how desperate they are new blood.

by Anonymousreply 22December 3, 2021 10:25 AM

^*arena

by Anonymousreply 23December 3, 2021 10:26 AM

I don't know who Lauren Bush is and poor Britney was always mentally ill, even 20 - 25 years ago.

Someone's really scraping the bottom of the barrel for this bullshit. The Sussexes are losing it, whatever "it" they have left.

What's next? A breathless re-telling of Kate's skirt catching in the wind ten years ago? William making an ass of himself dancing at a party in high school? Kate and Wills getting drunk at a club 15 years ago? William cheating at Monopoly as a child?

by Anonymousreply 24December 3, 2021 10:45 AM

[quote]Britney actually spoke about this like 20 years ago.

I was about to say the same thing! I remember no one believing her at the time. The National Enquirer brought it up several years ago and I can't find their article, but did find a CDL article that mentions is.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 25December 3, 2021 10:50 AM

* mentions IT, not "is"

by Anonymousreply 26December 3, 2021 10:51 AM

This is a story about William, not MM.

by Anonymousreply 27December 3, 2021 11:04 AM

This is a story about William created and placed in the newspapers by MM.

by Anonymousreply 28December 3, 2021 11:11 AM

The story has been around since long before Meghan even met Harry, so stop being stupid, you dumb trolls.

by Anonymousreply 29December 3, 2021 11:12 AM

Of course it's been around for years, r29, and there's a reason it's come out of the blue right now and being put out there again.

She'll just keep failing, it's her destiny. Even when she won this appeal case, she had to admit to lying to the whole world and she had to apologize to the court for it. Everyone knows she's a liar and she's not to be trusted. How's her political career looking now?

by Anonymousreply 30December 3, 2021 11:21 AM

R30, at r27 you said Meghan created the story. She couldn't have, the story has been around for years, long before Meghan started dating Harry.

I wouldn't be calling others liars when you pull shit like this.

by Anonymousreply 31December 3, 2021 11:26 AM

Created the story [italic] to place in the rumors mill again right now [/italic] not that she created the story originally herself, duh.

Pull shit like this? Pull shit like what, you fucking moron? You have to be deeply stupid or you're willfully misunderstanding. Either way - you're some kind of pathetic Marklestan troll. Bleah.

by Anonymousreply 32December 3, 2021 11:39 AM

I don’t think people didn’t believe her. She was still a teen at the time and the biggest pop star in the world. I’m sure teenage William fancied her. Many did. She was very attractive

by Anonymousreply 33December 3, 2021 11:43 AM

I'm a Datalounge regular who has been here since 2005 and all I've ever done on these threads is point out when the tiresome old biddy troll like you lies, r32, so of course you guys start screaming that I love Meghan and also that I must be from LSA. Neither are true. Sorry that hurts what passes for your feelings.

Meghan didn't create the story. It doesn't make sense to say she "created" it again and sent it in to Just Jared. That's not how the word "create" works, and it's doubtful that anyone would think it was worth the effort to get recycled old gossip on Just Jared, of all places.

I eagerly await your accusations that I am a paid PR troll and/or Omid Scobie.

by Anonymousreply 34December 3, 2021 11:46 AM

You're dumber than Scooby doo Scobie and you're not good enough at this to get paid for it.

Someone took the time to put these ancient stories about nothing and Britney and William together and then sent them in to someone. You say it was JustJared? Okay. It doesn't matter what the outlet was, it's just more Markle created (and Sunshine Sachs) content to push her narrative of Sussexes-good/Cambridges - bad. It goes along with her cartoonish Hollywood mentality and lack of understanding of the Monarchy.

It's so brave and righteous of you to defend poor, innocent, middle aged, shopworn Meghan out of the goodness of your heart! Bless you, child.

by Anonymousreply 35December 3, 2021 11:58 AM

[quote]Someone took the time to put these ancient stories about nothing and Britney and William together and then sent them in to someone. You say it was JustJared?

No, I didn't say that.

[quote]It's so brave and righteous of you to defend poor, innocent, middle aged, shopworn Meghan out of the goodness of your heart!

Jesus fucking Christ, lady, seek help. You were wrong that this was gossip that could have been "created" by Meghan Markle. You shouldn't be having an emotional meltdown about it just because you were corrected.

by Anonymousreply 36December 3, 2021 12:04 PM

No, it was created NOW and placed NOW so that it would have an effect NOW.

You shouldn't be having an emotional meltdown about it just because she does this sort of thing. We all know it's ridiculous. We all know she will fail - again - we all know that William will be King and Kate will be Queen Consort and all their children will be princes and princesses. Poor old Megs will always be a lesser royal, never at the top. It was the same for her with trying to be an actress for all those years. The farthest she ever got was a part as second-tier player in a Canadian cable tv show and she was way on the wrong side of 35 already. She did have that job as a suitcase holder on a game show too. That was some stellar thespian work.

Really her best work was committing the crime of perjury and lying so blatantly and outrageously to the court and to everyone in the public. Everyone knows what a big fat liar Megs is now. As well as Meghan just being big and fat in general, of course. Why is she so fat now? Is it stress eating? Being so much older as a mother? And why is her daughter invisible? Is she ashamed of the child? Is she ashamed of Archie? The Tindalls and the Phillips don't have their kids on display but they don't go to extremes to hide them either. What is wrong with the Sussex kids? I suppose it could just be a cash grab. Withhold the children until they get a bigger price for selling those photos, that may be all that's behind it.

She really should do something about that back fat problem. That was so unsightly.

by Anonymousreply 37December 3, 2021 12:30 PM

I think Meghan, her PR and her demented troll farm are so stupid they think if they can take William out, Meghan will be KWEEN!!! A reminder that Meghan was a D list actress from a white and black trash family, who majored in "Communications" at Northwestern aka Showbiz 101 for Social Climbers.

by Anonymousreply 38December 3, 2021 4:34 PM

Meghan WILL be Queen, R38.

You just don't know it yet.

by Anonymousreply 39December 3, 2021 5:16 PM

As an American. I don't give shit about Meghan nor the Royal Family. Both can go to hell. Neither have anything to do with the problems right now in The US. Neither does Britney. We have real issues to worry about not these spoiled rich morons.

by Anonymousreply 40December 3, 2021 6:43 PM

I figure Meghan's psycho fanclub are the same middle-aged obese black women who are obsessed with the Real Housewives.

by Anonymousreply 41December 3, 2021 6:46 PM

R27, it kills you that no one really took the bait about some non-story from 20 years ago about Will and made their way right back to the person who is trying to regurgitate negative stories about Will & Kate to deflect from her own issues.

by Anonymousreply 42December 3, 2021 8:34 PM

The twink doesn't live in Vegas and why would he accompany his bf to a dentist appointment?

by Anonymousreply 43December 3, 2021 8:42 PM

HELP!

We’ve been forced to have an unwanted cyber relationship with this hag.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 44December 3, 2021 8:50 PM

[quote] The twink doesn't live in Vegas and why would he accompany his bf to a dentist appointment?

What twink?

by Anonymousreply 45December 4, 2021 12:15 AM

R45, I think that comment was meant for this thread:

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 46December 4, 2021 2:06 AM

That's because he's not a cheater r11. That would be both Harry and Meghan actually.

by Anonymousreply 47December 5, 2021 6:07 AM

I doubt if William cheats. He affects me as being a very single-minded individual who was probably wounded badly by Charles and Diana's infidelities. Diana used him as a sounding board for her affairs which probably disgusted him. Explains why he would have sought refuge with a solidly upper-middle-class family like the Middletons where the parents stayed married and had good relations with their kids.

People forget Harry was pretty much neglected by Diana - she was totally enamored of her lookalike son William. And they only saw her for half of their school holidays. Otherwise they were always at school and spending half their school holidays with their father and the Queen.

by Anonymousreply 48December 5, 2021 8:27 PM

[quote] This is a story about William created and placed in the newspapers by MM.

So the same newspapers she rails against are willing put stories in their papers for her?

You don't have to like her, but don't be stupid. Stop wasting bandwith with this silly stupidity

by Anonymousreply 49December 6, 2021 8:20 PM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!