Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

'Playboy' makes history with first openly gay cover star, Bretman Rock

Bretman Rock is making history with his appearance on the cover of Playboy magazine's October 2021 digital issue, as the 23-year-old becomes the first openly gay male to secure the coveted spot.

The Hawaii-based Filipino influencer isn't new to the spotlight after making a name for himself on YouTube and the short-form video app Vine, where Rock displayed both his humor and his skill with makeup. And while videos of him applying contour and trying out drag makeup came long before there were other men in makeup gaining notoriety online, Rock continues to break boundaries with his latest cover shoot.

"I'm a @playboy bunny," Rock wrote on Twitter alongside photos of the digital cover where he's wearing the famous bunny suit.

According to Playboy, Rock isn't the first man to rock different parts of the iconic outfit. However, he is only the third to appear on the cover of the men's lifestyle and entertainment magazine, behind the magazine's late founder Hugh Hefner and, in July 2020, Latin pop star Bad Bunny; Rock is the first openly gay man.

"For Playboy to have a male on the cover is a huge deal for the LGBT community, for my brown people community and it’s all so surreal," Rock told the publication. A total 'is this even f***ing happening right now?' type of vibe."

Rock's cover story hasn't yet been released, but a representative for GLAAD, the leading LGBTQ advocacy organization accelerating acceptance and equality, explains why the representation is so important.

"Playboy’s inclusion of Bretman Rock on its cover is a powerful step forward in the ongoing movement towards greater diversity and inclusion in fashion and modeling," Anthony Allen Ramos, GLAAD’s head of talent, said in a statement. "As the first out gay man to cover the magazine, especially during Filipino American History Month, Bretman Rock is continuing to defy gender norms and use his massive social platform to not only break down barriers for LGBTQ inclusion in the industry, but also inspire so many other LGBTQ Filipinos who have been underrepresented in fashion, modeling, and across media."

Still, not everyone is celebrating Rock's cover appearance, as evidenced by the many negative comments — along with the positive — on Playboy's Twitter announcement.

"Playboy has been dead for a while now, folks. Case in point as to why..." one person wrote. Another replied, "There are appropriate magazines for this homie to be featured. You guys have gone left! I’m out Playboy, I’ve been a fan since the early 90s. I’m not anti gay or trans or anything, this is just none sense!"

Others commented on the nature of the magazine, sharing thoughts about how the latest digital cover choice seemingly veers from the publication's intended purpose.

"Now Playboy is Playgay. They will destroy each and every haven of masculinity," someone said. Another wrote, "Couldn’t they just revived Playgirl and had him debut on the cover for that since target audience for Playboy is straight dudes who prob won’t take too kindly to seeing a man on the cover of Playboy."

A spokesperson for PLBY Group, the publication's parent media company, tells Yahoo Life that pushback in the face of progress is expected, noting, "Since posting last Friday, we’ve received a lot of great comments, but far too many offensive ones as well. These are the same kind of comments Playboy received when we put Darine Stern, an African American woman, on the cover in 1971; when we featured transgender model Tula Cossey in 1991; [when we] fought for abortion rights before Roe v Wade and cannabis law reform in the 1970s."

The spokesperson adds that challenging such notions is a part of the magazine's mission.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 106October 6, 2021 3:56 PM

"Standing for freedom and equality is in the DNA of this brand. Today, Playboy is much more than a magazine," a representative continues. "Our digital covers are creative snapshots that drive and reflect the current dialogue around pleasure, sexuality, equality and culture. If a gay man feels sexy in a bunny costume, an iconic symbol of sexiness, why shouldn’t he be able to wear it proudly? Serving as a platform for representation is and will always be what Playboy stands for."

Now, Rock is a part of that change.

by Anonymousreply 1October 4, 2021 11:55 PM

I thought Playboy was for straight guys?

by Anonymousreply 2October 4, 2021 11:56 PM

This queen again.

No surprise that they would use a ladyboy to try to appeal to straight men.

by Anonymousreply 3October 4, 2021 11:57 PM

Put it away.

by Anonymousreply 4October 4, 2021 11:59 PM

NO straight man wants that thing.

by Anonymousreply 5October 4, 2021 11:59 PM

Kill it with fire!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 6October 5, 2021 12:02 AM

Not attractive, not provocative. They'll erode what's left of the brand if they continue down this path.

by Anonymousreply 7October 5, 2021 12:02 AM

Great. Now PLAYGIRL can start showing vag.

by Anonymousreply 8October 5, 2021 12:02 AM

Not this ugly thing again

by Anonymousreply 9October 5, 2021 12:02 AM

Everyone related to this story including the poor Yahoo "writer" are SCRAPING the bottom of the barrel for attention.

by Anonymousreply 10October 5, 2021 12:07 AM

I'm still confused.

Is this aimed towards "straight" men?

Who is the audience for this? Playboy readers?

How odd.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 11October 5, 2021 12:11 AM

Fembot wish fulfillment. Insufferable.

by Anonymousreply 12October 5, 2021 12:12 AM

There are several "nacreous layers of perma cum" in online media where things exist but no-one can explain why or for whom. You can be sure there is no there there. Just a rancid layer of humanity's ejaculate.

by Anonymousreply 13October 5, 2021 12:13 AM

I don't get the point of this.

by Anonymousreply 14October 5, 2021 12:14 AM

That muffled noise you hear is Hugh Hefner spinning in his grave.

by Anonymousreply 15October 5, 2021 12:14 AM

Rofl R13.

I have no idea what you're talking about, but I love what you wrote.

by Anonymousreply 16October 5, 2021 12:15 AM

[quote] The Hawaii-based Filipino influencer

They couldn't find an American?

Even James Charles would sell more articles than this "thing" would.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 17October 5, 2021 12:17 AM

He's no Gloria Steinem, 1963

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 18October 5, 2021 12:17 AM

Why? No one wants to see that besides his mother and whatever drag queens he hangs out with. Guess there’s still hope for Elliott Page

by Anonymousreply 19October 5, 2021 12:17 AM

Playboy went woke and got broke. Good radiane to a once culturally relevant publication. Straight women won't buy this and neither will straight men. So the only group left are gay men.

by Anonymousreply 20October 5, 2021 12:17 AM

I do genuinely pity at the thought of the few remaining elderly heterosexual men that still read Playboy. Smuggling their copy to the bathroom as they have done 12 times a month for the last 40 years, while the wife is distracted screaming at the gardener, only to pull it out of its discreet brown paper bag and seeing this. It must be like the sky falling down down for them.

by Anonymousreply 21October 5, 2021 12:18 AM

How DARE you OP! Its "Playboy" makes HERstory...

by Anonymousreply 22October 5, 2021 12:18 AM

[quote]Who is the audience for this?

I'm not sure you're supposed to ask that question.

by Anonymousreply 23October 5, 2021 12:18 AM

You know this really pissed off Alok.

by Anonymousreply 24October 5, 2021 12:19 AM

This is hot. Or cool. Let the straight men have their women. This is only gonna piss them off.

by Anonymousreply 25October 5, 2021 12:20 AM

Yikes

by Anonymousreply 26October 5, 2021 12:21 AM

Weird how the transesses and crossdressesses and the "I identifies as the other sexsesses" always seem to love being sexually objectified and exploited. Weird. Just weird.

by Anonymousreply 27October 5, 2021 12:25 AM

Fucking gross. Ugh.

by Anonymousreply 28October 5, 2021 12:26 AM

How is this supposed to sell the magazine? What straight man would actually purchase this with this cover?

by Anonymousreply 29October 5, 2021 12:29 AM

Playboy's collapse about to be complete?

by Anonymousreply 30October 5, 2021 12:29 AM

[quote] How is this supposed to sell the magazine? What straight man would actually purchase this with this cover?

Exactly, R29.

And even though most copies will probably be sold online, the truly straight Playboy readers won't pay for it.

It seems to be geared towards closet case and bisexual Playboy readers, which I'm guessing is not a significant number.

I predict this will be a HUGE flop.

by Anonymousreply 31October 5, 2021 12:31 AM

"Bretman Rock" is and oxymoron.

by Anonymousreply 32October 5, 2021 12:31 AM

No one has asked this question yet, but aren't Playboy models usually nude?

So does this mean that the LadyBoy will be showing cock?

by Anonymousreply 33October 5, 2021 12:32 AM

[quote]”Now Playboy is Playgay. They will destroy each and every haven of masculinity," someone said. Another wrote, "Couldn’t they just revived Playgirl and had him debut on the cover for that since target audience for Playboy is straight dudes who prob won’t take too kindly to seeing a man on the cover of Playboy."

[quote]A spokesperson for PLBY Group, the publication's parent media company, tells Yahoo Life that pushback in the face of progress is expected

Alienating your targeted audience is progress?

[quote]These are the same kind of comments Playboy received when we put Darine Stern, an African American woman, on the cover in 1971; when we featured transgender model Tula Cossey in 1991; [when we] fought for abortion rights before Roe v Wade and cannabis law reform in the 1970s."

[quote]The spokesperson adds that challenging such notions is a part of the magazine's mission.

“Darine Stern, an African American woman” is still a woman, Tula Cossey and Bretman Rock are not. If the magazine’s mission has changed then perhaps they should tell their target audience… well, I guess they just did.

***

[quote]So does this mean that the LadyBoy will be showing cock?

Doubtful. There are more pictures in this People article.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 34October 5, 2021 12:39 AM
Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 35October 5, 2021 12:40 AM
Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 36October 5, 2021 12:40 AM

Is that a giant butt plug in r36?

by Anonymousreply 37October 5, 2021 12:47 AM

I don’t get it.

by Anonymousreply 38October 5, 2021 12:51 AM

Those shoes are great if one wants to look like a piano, r36.

by Anonymousreply 39October 5, 2021 12:54 AM

Nimrods, Playboy collapsed years ago. The magazine held on but folded in 2020. This is online bottom feeding on heritage names. There is no COVER, no magazine on sale, nothing to buy. Do try to keep up.

by Anonymousreply 40October 5, 2021 1:02 AM

I think we're into a second generation of online "writers" and "editors" and "publications". None of this is writing. None of this is editing. Or "publishing". it's all some kind of off-putting venal upside down world, circle jerk. Full of non events and people with nothing to contribute to society but attention seeking and collecting hits and brand building. All for nothing.

by Anonymousreply 41October 5, 2021 1:05 AM

[quote]This is online bottom feeding on heritage names. There is no COVER, no magazine on sale, nothing to buy. Do try to keep up.

A quick search of the site shows a subscription is required to see playmates, galleries, videos and full issues of the magazine (1953-2020). The free content is limited to assorted articles and cover models like Bretman Rock.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 42October 5, 2021 1:30 AM

The pictures are very boring, so it doesn’t even have that potentially salvageable excuse of being artistically avant-garde

by Anonymousreply 43October 5, 2021 1:40 AM

I think this is absolutely hilarious.

by Anonymousreply 44October 5, 2021 1:45 AM

This whole brand is dead. Hefner's sons don't know what their doing. If they were smart they would just license the fuck out of the Playboy Bunny image and call it a day. No one gives a shit about Playboy Centerfolds when porn is everywhere on the internet!

by Anonymousreply 45October 5, 2021 1:46 AM

They tried to become a legitimate magazine with serious journalistic articles, but that didn't work.

Playboy couldn't rid itself of the "stink" of the porn industry.

by Anonymousreply 46October 5, 2021 1:47 AM

The end is nigh.

by Anonymousreply 47October 5, 2021 1:48 AM

If Bretman’s sexy spread gets a few hetero guys to make the switch to dick I’m all for it

by Anonymousreply 48October 5, 2021 1:54 AM

[quote]They couldn't find an American?

They did. Bretman Rock is a naturalized US citizen.

by Anonymousreply 49October 5, 2021 4:23 AM

Why? Is Playboy that desperate to be relevant again? This is like putting Elliot Page on the cover of Playgirl. Straight women and gay men are not interested in that shit.

by Anonymousreply 50October 5, 2021 8:27 AM

[quote] Bretman Rock is a naturalized US citizen.

I meant a REAL American.

by Anonymousreply 51October 5, 2021 9:11 AM

Resistance is futile.

by Anonymousreply 52October 5, 2021 9:16 AM

I don't get the drama. We are no longer living in the 1950s. Things have changed. Some guys, who identify as straight, are into femmes and ladyboys. Big whoop.

by Anonymousreply 53October 5, 2021 10:15 AM

There is a very VERY tiny number of men who are tranny chasers. They identify as "straight" but they are not. They are not gay, not straight. They are tranny chasers, their own sexuality. They want men who live as women yet have big cocks. Must have a cock.

by Anonymousreply 54October 5, 2021 10:21 AM

R53 is a femme ladyboy.

by Anonymousreply 55October 5, 2021 10:22 AM

Playboy? How quaint.

by Anonymousreply 56October 5, 2021 10:24 AM

I'm glad society is alienating straight men with this kind of stuff,they deserve it! It's their fault for years there were only sexualized females everywhere and nothing for us gays! Now they know what it feels like to live in a society that doesn't pander to you.

by Anonymousreply 57October 5, 2021 10:48 AM

Gawd, ya'll. Join Fetlife and see how many men are "heteroflexible." I guess they just see it as a little kinky.

by Anonymousreply 58October 5, 2021 10:55 AM

[quote] There is a very VERY tiny number of men who are tranny chasers.

Which is why they are more loyal customers and purchaser of magazines. Just like performers making bank by catering to foot fetishists. They are such tiny markets that they buy stuff that is offered to them instead of just relying on what's free out there for them.

by Anonymousreply 59October 5, 2021 11:02 AM

Great way to shoot their dying brand ever further in the foot.

by Anonymousreply 60October 5, 2021 11:09 AM

It's pretty obvious this is a publicity stunt, but what for? Playboy has nothing to offer any audience now.

by Anonymousreply 61October 5, 2021 11:09 AM

Well, you're wrong, I'm guessing. Whatever is left of an editorial overview on this stinking carcass Playboy is doing this for reasons other than pleasing a couple tranny chasers. Probably just doing it to get hits and remind people that Playboy even exists as a online "magazine". All publicity is good publicity.

by Anonymousreply 62October 5, 2021 11:10 AM

my remark at R62 is for R59. And not the subsequent poster who has the same reaction as I do. Publicity stunt.

by Anonymousreply 63October 5, 2021 11:11 AM

Straights guys have plenty of free straight adult entertainment. The content for fetish enthusiasts is not so vast. It's more likely for fetish lovers to buy stuff than straight people with vanilla taste. Mainstream porn and erotica doesn't sell in a market where there is an abundance of free mainstream porn and erotica available on the internet. Catering to niche markets is more likely to succeed than convincing straight guys that they are supposed to buy sofcore content.

by Anonymousreply 64October 5, 2021 11:19 AM

So Playboy is going to go fetish? Your business theory is a load of baloney. Playboy's brand was never fetish. They won't be able to rebuild based on vanilla fetish either.

by Anonymousreply 65October 5, 2021 11:24 AM

I'm sure a straight guy wants to jack off to THAT.

by Anonymousreply 66October 5, 2021 2:48 PM

I mean let’s be honest, Playboy was irrelevant as a porn mag before even Hugh Hefner died. No one under 50 jerks off to porn magazines anymore, they use the internet.

They put the nail in the coffin when they got rid of nudity years ago. I believe they’ve brought it back.

But they can’t destroy or kill something that’s been pretty much dead forever. It seems like their PR plan is to rebrand and market to a younger audience who will wear their merchandise.

With that said, Hugh swung both ways and I’m sure he’d have picked out a much more handsome gay man to have put on the cover.

This guy is gross and sexless. Absolutely no sex appeal whatsoever.

by Anonymousreply 67October 5, 2021 2:56 PM

Brave and stunning!

by Anonymousreply 68October 5, 2021 2:56 PM

The Playboy issue with Ezra Miller sold well. I guess Playboy went for seconds.

by Anonymousreply 69October 5, 2021 3:10 PM

Once Upon A Time, there was a beautiful Princess, with a dick.

by Anonymousreply 70October 5, 2021 5:03 PM

The cover girl is a philippino so she probably doesn't have much of a dick any way.

It's almost like looking at a female.

by Anonymousreply 71October 5, 2021 6:11 PM

It's not for me!!!

*drops to ground, commences tantrum*

by Anonymousreply 72October 5, 2021 6:19 PM

I still think that if they were going to have a gay person on the cover, it should have been a real American.

Why put an ugly foreigner on their cover?

More WOKE, SJW bullshit.

These corporations really don't get it. That's why they are collapsing.

by Anonymousreply 73October 5, 2021 6:21 PM

Isn't this magazine being marketed to straight men? I don't think that many of them are into ladyboys.

Maybe Jeremy Renner will buy a copy, though.

by Anonymousreply 74October 5, 2021 6:22 PM

Is this magazine still being published? It should just die already. Playboy is so archaic. And a GUY in Playboy bunny costume? That's just plain stupid.

by Anonymousreply 75October 5, 2021 6:26 PM

I guess they should change the name to PlayThem.

by Anonymousreply 76October 5, 2021 6:28 PM

R53 actual straight men are not into other dudes. That is deluded as fuck. Only of they are locked up in prison.

by Anonymousreply 77October 5, 2021 6:30 PM

I don’t mind that they chose a man. And if he breaks a record doing it good for him.

I do think this is for publicity. Reminds me of every June companies brandish rainbow pride but come July erase their queer-friendly image. I looked it up and they appear to have only a few black bunnies and did not have a black playmate of the year until 1990, so it’s strange they boast about it like they have always been trendsetting progressive.

Anyway, I wish the best to Bretman and wellbeing in his future.

by Anonymousreply 78October 5, 2021 11:34 PM

If you are on Instagram and TikTok, you know a lot of straight-identified dudes openly lust for Bretman, which is why Playboy chose him

by Anonymousreply 79October 5, 2021 11:56 PM

Gloria Steinem said the black Playboy bunnies where she worked were called "chocolate bunnies." Ew.

by Anonymousreply 80October 6, 2021 12:01 AM

[quote] If you are on Instagram and TikTok, you know a lot of straight-identified dudes openly lust for Bretman, which is why Playboy chose him

Creepy white guys just love their subservient LadyBoys.

by Anonymousreply 81October 6, 2021 12:03 AM

He even drives Lesbians wild

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 82October 6, 2021 12:08 AM

I thought straight dudes like bland twinks like Canadian super Whitebread cutie William White?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 83October 6, 2021 12:09 AM

R81, most aren’t creepy. A lot of them are smokin hot

by Anonymousreply 84October 6, 2021 12:10 AM

If a straight identified dude does it with a dude, it’s likely Gonna be a cute Asian dude

by Anonymousreply 85October 6, 2021 12:11 AM

And Korean Pretty Boys.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 86October 6, 2021 12:11 AM

[quote] most aren’t creepy. A lot of them are smokin hot

Oh, please.

Oriental guys will sleep with the fattest, ugliest, smelliest and creepiest guys, as long as they're white.

Same goes for the females.

by Anonymousreply 87October 6, 2021 12:12 AM

The magazine folded when Covid hit. The PTB are directing this and those involved in actually doing the work that got the magazine published monthly are not happy. The PTB don't necessarily know how to run this business. Playboy Enterprises exists today solely to sell licensed merchandise.

by Anonymousreply 88October 6, 2021 12:19 AM

Every man on the planet goes limp from this.

by Anonymousreply 89October 6, 2021 1:08 AM

[quote] If you are on Instagram and TikTok, you know a lot of straight-identified dudes openly lust for Bretman, which is why Playboy chose him

Oh my god, get the fuck OUT of here with this bullshit.

by Anonymousreply 90October 6, 2021 1:30 AM

R90 likes being stuck in clueless 1998

by Anonymousreply 91October 6, 2021 1:40 AM

R75 Right? A guy in a playboy bunny suit

Let’s be honest even if straight men were a little curious, they wouldn’t find this guy attractive. Even if they surf Grindr out of curiosity this guy wouldn’t even be someone they’d look at.

by Anonymousreply 92October 6, 2021 2:11 AM

R92 sounds even more clueless

by Anonymousreply 93October 6, 2021 2:21 AM

Would you be talking about Playboy if it wasn't for this? I think that's why they pulled this gimmick.

by Anonymousreply 94October 6, 2021 2:23 AM

Next thing you know they'll put Lourdes Leon on the cover, in flagrante armpit hair.

by Anonymousreply 95October 6, 2021 2:29 AM

I say this as someone who generally likes Bretman because he seems harmless: Why? Playboy is geared towards straight males. Why would they featuring a gay male as the issue's bunny?

by Anonymousreply 96October 6, 2021 5:07 AM

.,.,

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 97October 6, 2021 6:23 AM

He's ugly, and obnoxious. Don't know why this creature keeps getting a push in the industry. His whole "yaas mama werk bitch!!!" Shtick is beyond old.

by Anonymousreply 98October 6, 2021 6:33 AM

R79 lives in an alternate reality. Those guys aren't straight.

by Anonymousreply 99October 6, 2021 8:40 AM

There’s this weird insistence, this weird *forcing*.

I think it really boils down to insecurity about what these people desire. Honey, as long as it’s consenting adults, it’s fine; and there will be other people who are into it.

Forcing it onto the “cover” of a magazine that doesn’t cater to that audience, and insisting that the audience applaud it is pathological. Just enjoy your thing and stop trying to make everyone validate it. It’s so pushy and weird.

by Anonymousreply 100October 6, 2021 9:38 AM

It’s like a form of evangelism.

You wouldn’t go into a synagogue and insist that everyone say The Lord’s Prayer.

by Anonymousreply 101October 6, 2021 9:43 AM

^^ and call it “making history”.

Haha, that’s what makes it really insane.

by Anonymousreply 102October 6, 2021 9:44 AM

i love him

by Anonymousreply 103October 6, 2021 9:57 AM

It's just PR, dolls. People fall for it!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 104October 6, 2021 3:18 PM

The only thing that's missing from this ugly queen's photo, is a pregnant photo shoot.

That would make it absurdity complete!

by Anonymousreply 105October 6, 2021 3:20 PM

Oh, I see. They’re trying to be more inclusive.

by Anonymousreply 106October 6, 2021 3:56 PM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!