Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Taron Egerton and Jonathan Bailey in COCK

The jokes are writing themselves

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 25October 13, 2021 4:28 AM

Taron's been in cock many times

by Anonymousreply 1September 24, 2021 4:46 AM

This thread will leave me COCKeyed.

by Anonymousreply 2September 24, 2021 4:53 AM

As a straight man, this role will be a huge challenge!

by Anonymousreply 3September 24, 2021 5:04 AM

Close your eyes and think of Elton.

by Anonymousreply 4September 24, 2021 5:05 AM

Taron is meh to me, but Jonathan Bailey, hubba hubba!

by Anonymousreply 5September 24, 2021 5:21 AM

I hear it's a classic two-hander.

by Anonymousreply 6September 24, 2021 5:21 AM

Are there discounts for groups?

by Anonymousreply 7September 24, 2021 5:24 AM

They mean "rooster", right?

by Anonymousreply 8September 24, 2021 6:46 AM

Do they show it?

by Anonymousreply 9September 24, 2021 6:54 AM

R1 But how many times has cock been in Taron?

by Anonymousreply 10September 24, 2021 7:05 AM

Jonathan Bailey was terrific as the groom who's "Not Getting Married Today" in "Company", alongside fellow hottie Richard Fleeshman

by Anonymousreply 11September 24, 2021 7:23 AM

"We had one goal with this production:

To make the gays' heads ESPLODE!"

by Anonymousreply 12September 24, 2021 7:30 AM

This is a bit on the nose.

by Anonymousreply 13September 24, 2021 7:37 AM

I saw COCK with Ben Whishaw. It wasn’t very good.

by Anonymousreply 14September 24, 2021 9:16 AM

Do they show any? If not, hard pass.

by Anonymousreply 15September 24, 2021 10:38 AM

[quote] Cock follows a gay couple whose relationship is called into question when John takes a break from his boyfriend. While on a break, John meets the girl of his dreams, and must decide what path to take sexually.

Sounds vaguely familiar.

by Anonymousreply 16September 24, 2021 11:20 AM

Read my mind r16, I came here to do a Michael Barbaro joke.

by Anonymousreply 17September 24, 2021 12:36 PM

I wonder if Jonathan will get a piece of that

by Anonymousreply 18September 25, 2021 12:51 AM

The whole inspiration for this (shit) play (I saw it in Melbourne once) is that a straight guy was confused at all these men saying they were gay after being in long term relationships with women. So he was like, well what about the flip side of that. Clearly knows nothing about what its like to me a man attracted to other men. It tends goes 'one way' for a reason. Well, many reasons, but you know what im saying.

On the one hand anything queer and not 'homonorative' is very in now - shitting on gay men is acceptable. But on the other, surely this should be cancelled as it was written by a straight white man, who clearly has no idea about the experiences of gay men?? Or could he just say he was 'open'/ not '100% straight' if the woke social media queers got it in their minds to cancel him a la Andre Aicman. I remember when the book came out as a teenager, and all the interviews he gave was basically asking him how as a 'straight man' he was able to write a gay love story (even though its not). He was very clear he was 'straight' then, but by the time the movie came out, the cultural landscape had changed so much, he basically had to say he wasn't straight.

by Anonymousreply 19October 13, 2021 3:55 AM

[quote] I saw COCK with Ben Whishaw

A rag of flesh hanging from a rag of flesh.

by Anonymousreply 20October 13, 2021 3:57 AM

[Quote] shitting on gay men is acceptable.

Not only gay me.

by Anonymousreply 21October 13, 2021 3:58 AM

It's not a shit play. It's a great play, you dolt, R19. Your woke analysis is a tedious queer analysis that strips away the play's meaning in a drearily simplistic way.

by Anonymousreply 22October 13, 2021 4:01 AM

Yes, you stripped it away in a simplistically dreary way!

by Anonymousreply 23October 13, 2021 4:03 AM

I really don’t understand the meaning of the play? A straight guy wrote a “what if the tables turned” scenario he thought was witty but because he’s straight, he’s ignorant that men have left men for women all along.

R19 Right it’s borderline homophobic perspective to write such a play. I didn’t find “Call Me By Your Name” homophobic but it was totally out of touch with gay men and being gay and the experience.

by Anonymousreply 24October 13, 2021 4:26 AM

Such a stupid misreading.

by Anonymousreply 25October 13, 2021 4:28 AM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!