Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Paul Verhoeven: SHARON STONE IS A PATHOLOGICAL LIAR!

Paul Verhoeven, the director of "Basic Instinct," spoke out for the first time since Sharon Stone claimed in her memoir that she was misled about how the movie's famous leg-crossing scene would be filmed.

"My memory is radically different from Sharon's memory," Verhoeven told Variety at the Cannes Film Festival this week while promoting his new movie, "Benedetta."

In Stone's memoir, "The Beauty of Living Twice,"released in March, she said she'd been reluctant to do the scene in which her character, Catherine Tramell, exposes her crotch while crossing her legs during an interrogation.

She wrote that Verhoeven had assured her that her crotch would not be visible on screen. But Stone said that after the movie was finished she was invited to a preview screening and saw that her crotch was indeed visible.

"Her version is impossible," Verhoeven told Variety. "She knew exactly what we were doing. I told her it was based on a story of a woman that I knew when I was a student who did the crossing of her legs without panties regularly at parties. When my friend told her we could see her vagina, she said, 'Of course, that's why I do it.' Then Sharon and I decided to do a similar sequence."

Stone's recollection in the book of seeing the scene made it sound as if she and Verhoeven were not simpatico.

"That was how I saw my vagina-shot for the first time, long after I'd been told, 'We can't see anything - I just need you to remove your panties, as the white is reflecting the light, so we know you have panties on,'" Stone wrote.

She continued: "I went to the projection booth, slapped Paul across the face, left, went to my car, and called my lawyer, Marty Singer."

Insider contacted Stone's rep for comment but didn't get a response.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 26August 20, 2021 10:29 PM

She's been saying the same thing for decades including on the special features of the discs. Why would he speak about this now? I believe him but it's clear she's still uncomfortable talking about this scene so there is no need to rehash it.

by Anonymousreply 1July 9, 2021 6:26 PM

Verhoeven is telling the truth. I worked for his agent during the BASIC INSTINCT period and at the time he said something to the effect that he cast Sharon because, like the character of Catherine, she's a sociopath.

by Anonymousreply 2July 9, 2021 6:28 PM

I believe him, but I have to give Sharon credit for keeping to the same story for so long. She's a smart liar -- she tells the story once, then never wavers or elaborates, always the same lie, that way she won't forget the details.

by Anonymousreply 3July 9, 2021 6:30 PM

Of course she’s lying. What’s the point of not wearing panties if the audience wouldn’t see?

by Anonymousreply 4July 9, 2021 6:31 PM

[R1] He's promoting a movie at the same time her stupid book came out - that's why.

by Anonymousreply 5July 9, 2021 6:31 PM

[R1] And surely he was asked about it by reporters. Verhoeven has never sought publicity for its own sake.

by Anonymousreply 6July 9, 2021 6:32 PM

What a dumb excuse, and frankly, while her claims may have been harmless 20 years ago, her stupid “I didn’t know” claim could now get his career ruined.

If the camera wasn’t going to show her pus then they wouldn’t do the scene in the first place.

by Anonymousreply 7July 9, 2021 6:35 PM

Are we really talking (again) about Sharon Stone's twat?

by Anonymousreply 8July 9, 2021 6:37 PM

Fine, if you must see my cooch, here it is.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 9July 9, 2021 6:38 PM

Someone ask her about her guest appearance on [italic]Silver Spoons[/italic].

by Anonymousreply 10July 9, 2021 6:39 PM

OP: More Sharon Stone hate?...... my goodness...

by Anonymousreply 11July 9, 2021 6:40 PM

". I worked for his agent during the BASIC INSTINCT period and at the time he said something to the effect that he cast Sharon because, like the character of Catherine, she's a sociopath.."

That doesn't make it true necessarily.

by Anonymousreply 12July 9, 2021 6:41 PM

It’s her same story for nearly 30 years and she’s sticking to it. She’s lying, but who cares anymore. I never understood the white reflecting the light and how that’s even possible. If this was true, she’d change them to black to avoid them getting her pussy shot. It’s your greatest character, Sharon. Should’ve just owned up to it.

by Anonymousreply 13July 9, 2021 6:42 PM

I'm glad to see the guy push back.

by Anonymousreply 14July 9, 2021 6:45 PM

“I'm glad to see the guy push back.”

Men lie all the time.

by Anonymousreply 15July 9, 2021 6:50 PM

[R12] I have no reason to doubt Paul Verhoeven and every reason to doubt Sharon Stone.

by Anonymousreply 16July 9, 2021 6:50 PM

Damn, we’re still talkin ‘bout Stone’s cooter, lady hamper, honey baked ham 30 plus years later? She’s got a vagine, she flashed it, give it a rest. That broad is sumpin else.

by Anonymousreply 17July 9, 2021 6:51 PM

Her cooch was the finest snatch in all of Crawford County!

In 1978.

by Anonymousreply 18July 9, 2021 6:56 PM

Yeah her stories often don’t add up. Suffers a debilitating brain bleed/stroke but is twirling onto the Academy Awards stage with Travolts five days later? Reading the teleprompter and sounding fine? Also she acts like she lost her career. Bitch was in a huge number of high profile movies but they all bombed. Cold Creek Manor for Disney, Catwoman for WB, Basic Instinct 2 for Sony Pictures International. Her false narrative myth-building is fascinating.

by Anonymousreply 19August 20, 2021 9:59 PM

[quote]When my friend told her we could see her vagina, she said, 'Of course, that's why I do it.'

I don't know these people (and neither do any of you) so who knows who's lying, but this sure as shit sounds like something some horny straight dude made up vs something an actual woman said irl.

by Anonymousreply 20August 20, 2021 10:06 PM

Sharon is nuts. Everyone in Hollywood knows that, which is why no one except Ryan Murphy wants to cast her in anything anymore.

Does that mean she's lying about this? Absolutely not. But it's hard to take her word for anything without corroboration.

by Anonymousreply 21August 20, 2021 10:09 PM

[quote]R12 at the time he said something to the effect that he cast Sharon because, like the character of Catherine, she's a sociopath.

he leaves out that every conceivable A List female star had turned it down, so he was in a bind.

by Anonymousreply 22August 20, 2021 10:09 PM

I don't know who's lying, but you'd think it would be somewhere in somebody's contract. It's hard to believe none of the studio lawyers would cover their ass

by Anonymousreply 23August 20, 2021 10:09 PM

Stone must be delusional if she thinks anyone believed her bullshit explanation.

by Anonymousreply 24August 20, 2021 10:14 PM

Sharon Stone is an amusing star, occasionally talented actress, was pretty and glamorous for years, and a mythomaniac. I like her for that combination.

by Anonymousreply 25August 20, 2021 10:25 PM

I'm not surprised.

by Anonymousreply 26August 20, 2021 10:29 PM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!