Continue your foolishness.
Judge Rules! II - Brad Pitt awarded joint custody of the kids
by Anonymous | reply 26 | July 24, 2021 11:36 PM |
Wait is this after Angie went back to court? The timeline is confusing.
by Anonymous | reply 1 | July 3, 2021 5:34 AM |
R1, they will be going back to court in July 9 but it looks like Angelina has already started a new appeal after this one.
by Anonymous | reply 3 | July 3, 2021 11:37 PM |
What happened with the appeal?
by Anonymous | reply 4 | July 20, 2021 2:03 AM |
OP, this really isn't as interesting as you keep trying to make it. Starting multiple threads or adding scripted responses doesn't change anything. Your energy would be better spent on another topic or maybe another website.
by Anonymous | reply 5 | July 20, 2021 2:12 AM |
R4, a lawyer who watched it said a decision should be made within a day but it’s been almost 2 weeks.
by Anonymous | reply 6 | July 20, 2021 2:30 AM |
Judge rules that judge doesn’t rule.
[quote] Angelina Jolie wins appeal to remove judge from Brad Pitt divorce case
by Anonymous | reply 7 | July 23, 2021 10:19 PM |
He doesnt really want to be burdened with those kids...seriously. 2 weekends a month will suffice...if that.
by Anonymous | reply 8 | July 23, 2021 10:23 PM |
Angie makes too big a deal out of this. If she loses this case she can always send another ship to Africa to pick up a new cargo of kids.
by Anonymous | reply 9 | July 23, 2021 10:33 PM |
Brad: fighter or coward?
by Anonymous | reply 10 | July 23, 2021 10:35 PM |
I think he should give it up. As hard as it may be, the kids are old enough to decide now. Even if she brainwashed them, there’s not much that can be done now.
by Anonymous | reply 11 | July 23, 2021 10:53 PM |
He has far more money than she does - he can keep draining her bank account, if she wants to carry on paying lawyers to continue this farce. She's the one much better served by giving up - if the kids love her best, they'll stay with her after they are 18.
by Anonymous | reply 12 | July 23, 2021 11:22 PM |
Is this about custody or residential parent? She’s the residential parent, the kids live with her, right? And Brad gets every other weekend and a day on the opposite week and certain vacation times etc.? That’s very different than jlint custody where he had an equal say in education, medical care and other stuff. He’s their father, he should never give up on his right to be a dad to his kids.
by Anonymous | reply 14 | July 24, 2021 3:15 PM |
[quote]In its ruling, the appeals court said Judge Ouderkirk did not disclose his business relationships with Pitt's lawyers.
This was the situation where Ouderkirk disclosed the relationships to her first attorneys but the second attorneys claimed they were never told, right?
by Anonymous | reply 15 | July 24, 2021 3:16 PM |
R14, he shouldn’t give up his rights, but he should give up trying to get joint custody. I know someone in the same situation and at these ages the relationship is not repairable IF the kids are against him. It’s futile. This is particularly true if the other parent actively tries to sabotage the relationship. The best he could hope for is that they soften when are adults.
by Anonymous | reply 16 | July 24, 2021 3:54 PM |
It's called Grandparent Rights!
by Anonymous | reply 17 | July 24, 2021 3:56 PM |
As if either of them has anything to do with raising these kids.
by Anonymous | reply 18 | July 24, 2021 3:59 PM |
At this point he's at risk of those kids "softening" toward him at 18 only because their mom doesn't have any money anymore.
by Anonymous | reply 19 | July 24, 2021 4:00 PM |
r15 it would appear so. He was making the proper disclosures up through the end of 2018, which is when Laura Wasser departed as Jolie's counsel. It was 2019 and 2020 that there was a problem - apparently he didn't properly notify her new counsel?
I'd like someone to weigh in on what happens from here. Obvs Pitt will appeal, but what are the chances of the CA Supreme Court taking this up? Also what does it mean for the existing custody ruling, that was recently put in place, does this ruling overturn that automatically. I see Jolie is prancing around Paris with the kids the past few days.
by Anonymous | reply 20 | July 24, 2021 4:09 PM |
r20...As if it even matters. The entire point of a custody battle is leverage for more MONEY.
by Anonymous | reply 21 | July 24, 2021 5:08 PM |
Jesus fucking christ. Will you fucking fraus stop spamming this site already with your brad and angelina shit? You're either pushing 50 or in your 50's already. Grow the fuck up and stop carrying on like teenage twats.
by Anonymous | reply 22 | July 24, 2021 7:13 PM |
Cunt at r22: this is DATALOUNGE, a gay gossip website. Heavily dedicated to gossip and talk about the rich and famous, as well as major entertainment news stories of the day. Pitt and Jolie fall under BOTH categories.
We'll carry on about them as much as we like, in multiple threads, over months and years. Custody battle or not. Or maybe you got lost and took an accidental left turn out of the 10,000th Armie Hammer thread here? I'm sure you can find your way back to that massively important, earth-shaking discussion.
by Anonymous | reply 23 | July 24, 2021 11:27 PM |
R23, gay men don't have cunts. Cunts have cunts.
by Anonymous | reply 24 | July 24, 2021 11:30 PM |
And r22 is a CUNT. Figuratively and literally. Now scoot on back to the Justin Bieber thread before Mommy calls you to dinner.
by Anonymous | reply 25 | July 24, 2021 11:34 PM |
R25. Shut up cunt.
by Anonymous | reply 26 | July 24, 2021 11:36 PM |