Jill Biden looking basic on cover of Vogue

I LOVE this! She's not an unapproachable glamour-puss; she's an All-American First Lady.

This totally fits her style

She looks great. What more could you want from a First Lady?

OP is a fool.

Why do she hide the tity?

Come on, this isn't Frau Weekly. It's fucking VOGUE! Also, she likes her stockings and high heels so I don't think some glam would have been uncomfortable for her.

That's kind of depressing. The stylists are mostly to blame,or the person who greenlit the final styling, but Leibovitz should have hung up her equipment decades ago. General look aside (and it's really general) the photos are flat and dull. There is no glow or vibe.

She’s a politician’s wife. She wouldn’t want to look glam.

I think she looks beautifully apholstered.

Michelle's cover(s) were tasteful with a nice dash of glam.

She looks better in these photos than she often does day to day; still, I don't care for her taste in clothes and she needs something done with her hair. At least she kept her tits and hoohah put away.

On the other hand, she's a politicians wife and teacher, not a model. There really shouldn't be any expectation for her to be glamorous. Photographing her in ballgowns whilst eating bonbons would be fake AF.

"apholstered"? Oh dear.

Who reads magazines, even Vogue, anymore? Either way, I'm thrilled Biden got a cover and Melania never did.

I don't care, do U?

I think she looks great. She's a real person with a doctorate.

Anna Wintour wanted NOTHING to do with Melania.

Donald wanted nothing to do with Melania.

[quote] Anna Wintour wanted NOTHING to do with Melania.

Neither did we.

OP wants her in pasties and a g-string.

Not hardly r17 Besides, I think Madge has ownership for such "outfits" now.

Not glam, but not a Kardashian or ones of those whores who got kicked out of the White House on Jan 20.

OP = Melania

I am delighted to say I have never seen Jill's nor Kamala's nipples.

I think she looks like a fit and well dressed grandma who happens to be a professional lady. Not glitzy but that would be inappropriate. She has smile lines from real happiness and frown lines from pain. Her hair is dated because she fucking likes it like that and you need to have a backbone to be an effective First Lady.

It's also so wonderful there aren't any photos of her titties or cooter. She could have a purple mohawk and wear Heafty bags and I would STILL say: hey, I'm just glad there are no photos of her with her claw up her gash like Melanoma.

OP knows nothing about politics and branding.

This is totally on point for Jill Biden, who BTW, is 70 years old and looks damn good for 70.

It's perfect. Like her jacket that had "LOVE" on the back instead of "I don't really care do U?" it sends a message: I'M NOT HER!

And thank God for that.

This is a case where the light shines from within and in this photo YOU CAN TELL.

Anyway, if Diana were still with us I imagine she'd look much like this on her cover.

She could pull 70s sexy off quite well when younger.

I think she looks really good -- healthy, happy, natural. So-oooo refreshing after that squinty-eyed, pole-dancing pee pee hooker we had to endure for so long.

This is a great cover for People Magazine, yes. This is not a Vogue worthy cover. That said Vogue hasn't really been up to snuff for some time.

Why is everyone yapping about well at least it's not Melania? Why go to that extreme? Michelle looked great on her cover at r9 and was still dignified and natural, just snazzed up a bit. I stand by my issue with the photography and composition. It's tired and helps in giving off that People Magazine vibe.

Oh, shut up -29-. Nobody cares what you fucking think about it.

Jill Biden looks beautiful. She's the wife of the president of the United states, not a glamour girl.

The first lady is supposed to look stylish chic and timeless, not Hollywood glamorous. The glamour is in the chicness.

And Melania Trump was a pornagraphic whore!

My MAGA sister made some really shitty jokes about Michelle Obama being a man and I said "Yeah, she may be. At least we know Melania isn't since we've all seen her pussy."

That shut her up.

Anna Wintour finally does one good thing

For contrast, DL "fave" Mamie Eisenhower was 58 when this photo was taken. (And yes, people looked much older back then, but still....)

Dr. J is 70

She looks lovely and is dressed in an age-appropriate (and Vogue-appropriate) $2,700 dress by an iconic American fashion house. Nothing "basic" about it.

I'd like to see jill invite Michelle Obama to the white house for an event they can host together.

That would be fun.

[quote] I'd like to see jill invite Michelle Obama to the white house for an event they can host together. That would be fun.

That WOULD be fun! And perhaps Michelle can lend Jill some fashion tips as well.

Come on, this isn't Frau Weekly. It's fucking VOGUE!

I'm absolutely sure of two things:

1) they approached her, not vice-versa.

2) they offered to glam her up more if she wanted, and she said she didn't want that.

It will make one very special couple I know of all the more furious that she made the cover of VOGUE without the cheapo glam treatment favored by certain others who never made it. For that alone I am so grateful to her.

[quote] 2) they offered to glam her up more if she wanted, and she said she didn't want that.

These are good points, r38, and probably true. If Jill had done a super glam cover photo, it would have been so out of character for her. The haters would have a field day. She's a little frumpy, but she's true to herself - which is refreshing.

It could be that she got a lot of heat for daring to wear that black number and high heels, that she wanted to back away from that possibly happening again.

If it were up to Dataloungrs, they'd have her all tarted up like an 80s vixen such as Sheena Easton or Donna Mills, with tons of eyeshadow, mascara, blush, and big hair.

Of course they approached her. Jeeze.

A happy middle =. A DL nightmare.

[quote] If Jill had done a super glam cover photo, it would have been so out of character for her.

Super “glam” in American-speak is Kardashian-JLo-Instagram-Tart-with heaps of makeup, hair extensions, falsies (of all kinds), and revealing clothing.

It’s odd how this is somehow normalized in this country now.

Many other places in the world place a high priority on natural attractiveness.

But here in the good ‘ole, USA, it’s all about superficial appearances enhanced by oodles of plastic surgery and artifice.

Jill looks lovely.

In contrast to the previous administration’s gaggle of females, she is not a joke.

Thankfully.

Fake news....cover made at a carnival!

How about something like this?

I miss the old days when VOGUE had fierce models on their cover.

[quote]I think she looks like a fit and well dressed grandma who happens to be a professional lady. Not glitzy but that would be inappropriate.

The fraus really have taken over here.

[quote]Michelle's cover(s) were tasteful with a nice dash of glam.

Michelle Obama has natural poise and style. Her photo shoots for glossy magazines are always on point and fabulous.

The glamour look just doesn't suit every woman.

The Huckabeast is one of the most disgusting, inbred cunts I've ever had the misfortune of laying my eyes on.

Yeah, Michelle Obama is one of the best.

This is almost as terrible as the one they did for Kamala Harris.

They need to stop exhuming Annie Lebowitz and get someone younger with fresh ideas. Jill Biden could look fierce, fabulous and professional at the same time. This cover just looks like a High school librarian's yearbook photo.

Why was Laura Bush never on the cover of Vogue? Is it because they didn't like her husband?

r34 Mamie would sometimes jazz it up a little and wear a sleeveless, low-cut number to show off her ta-tas.

I like it. She looks down to earth. No, it's not as glamorous as they could've done, but maybe that would've looked fake.

[quote]They need to stop exhuming Annie Lebowitz and get someone younger with fresh ideas.

The old Boomers who are in charge of things aren't going to relinquish power until they're all six feet under.

Laura Bush was on Ladies' Home Journal and People.

Link to Vogue First Lady gallery attached.

She looks lovely. Go shoot your eyes out OP.

Here’s your Republican glamor right here.

[quote] They need to stop exhuming Annie Lebowitz and get someone younger with fresh ideas. Jill Biden could look fierce, fabulous and professional at the same time.

Do you really think a Vogue photographer can force the First Lady of the United States to gussy herself up to look "fierce" and "fabulous" (and who even uses those words any more outside of "RuPaul's Drag Race"???) to satisfy your cheap taste?

No. Just, no.

On a massage table in the bowels of Mar-a-Lago, a certain Someone is fuming in 5 languages.

Yikes what the hell happened to Vogue? Lady's hair and dress are so cute!!

Fuck both Trumps, they're both Trash!

He's a mobster and she's a fucking hooker.

Who gives a damn what either one of them have to say? Fuck both of them all the way to hell.

Unfair!!

Fake news!

The "I teach Sunday School at my local Methodist church circa 1983" dress is an odd choice, but I still like and admire Jill Biden. Smart, low-key and doesn't make a fuss about anything, she's been a good First Lady so far.

I wouldn’t say she looks basic, I would say she looks relatable and authentic. And I appreciate that a lot post Melania.

The dress looks like a banana republic frock, prints can looks cheap. The hair needed more styling for the pic.

I'm thrilled Melanie, the fashion model was denied this honor.

If she had dressed more glamorous the media would start blabbering on about the optics. Democrats, and their partners and families, know going in that they will be held to an insanely high standard by the press. So they have to be more careful about these types of things. Or the next day NYT will have defecated out an article titled "Among Middle Americans, Biden Vogue Cover Raises Concern About Relatability".

That's a great picture of Hillary. She almost looks beautiful there.

The Daily Fail's readers are all trash.

It's the DL paper of record, r72

I like Jill but lets get real here ! The woman has taste for shit . I agree with R29 ,she could have made a tiny bit more effort to look polished. I get her schtick,but it is the cover of Vogue for gods sake.

She looks lovely and approachable.

Her warmth comes through.

OP wants her in scrubs.

[quote] I get her schtick,but it is the cover of Vogue for gods sake.

Yes, R74, the same Vogue that features Kim Kardashian on its covers.

The Daily Mail has the best photos.

The carefully arranged photo with the pen in her mouth is silly.

[quote] I'd like to see jill invite Michelle Obama to the white house for an event they can host together.

Ugh, no. They’re not sorority sisters.

You got me there R77 !

R46 you’ve put her in a shroud and a teased Korean wig?

Not an improvement.

It is nice to finally have a classy first lady in the White House again.

[quote] I'd like to see jill invite Michelle Obama to the white house for an event they can host together.

Well they won't be hosting together but sometime this year Barack and Michelle will have their portraits unveiled at the White House.

She looks classy refreshing after the last one.

She looks classy. Refreshing after the last one.

She always looks like a beachtown drunk.

She looks classy. Refreshing. After the last one.

And you’re an idiot R87.

She didn't just show up in a random frock from her closet. It is a Vogue shoot and she is shown in other clothes, too. The dress is from Oscar de la Renta, made of Italian viscose and lined in silk. Big florals are fairly popular right now.

Almost every first Lady since Jackie Kennedy has worn Oscar de la Renta, including the Slovenian tit model. Jill also wore an Oscar floral dress on election night. Their dresses are in the $1,700-$13,000+ range, so now you can attack her for that reason, too.

I think she looks nice.

She could wear a burlap sack and I'd still love her.

Daily Mail, maybe it's a glowing, friendly article because she isn't a SKANKY FUCKING WHORE like Melania.

I thought for a moment it's Linda Evans.

R87, you forgot to link to your photo, so I did it for you.

You’re welcome!

But but but... Dr. Jill was on the cover of VOGUE, while Melanomania has never. hahahahaha

I am friend of Vogue yes

I like her better in more revealing and glamorous clothes. They really suit her. It doesn’t look trashy like it did on Vairst lady

I would have featured a cleaner hairstyle.

Better than that mail order bride who’s lived in America almost 25 years and can’t speak in English coherently without being a plagiarist.

Michelle did it better

I think she looks lovely. My guess is that she purposely chose those clothes to make a definite point that she is nothing like Melania. It's nice to see a first lady who doesn't look like she should be running a brothel or just working in one.

It would be fun to see Michelle and Jill work on a project together.