Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.
Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.
Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.
Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.
That train has long left the station after Merrick Garland's nomination was obstructed a year before Obama left office and then ramming Amy Coney Barrett through a week before a presidential election.
I only want to hear Breyer making these kind of statements if he's sitting on the front porch of his retirement home.
| by Anonymous | reply 3 | April 7, 2021 5:22 PM |
Not a fan of Mitch McConnell, but refusing a hearing to one Supreme Court nominee is a much shorter-term and less wide-ranging action than inflating the court with new justices after 200+ years of their being nine.
I think it would cause a lot of GOP anger, pushback and vengeance. Might not be worth it.
| by Anonymous | reply 1 | April 7, 2021 4:39 PM |
[quote]ramming Amy Coney Barrett through
Do you have a video link? 😜
| by Anonymous | reply 2 | April 7, 2021 4:42 PM |
Ugh, if that miserable creep Clarence Thomas would just die already - we'd be rid of his hack legal opinions & the Widow Ginny would lose her power. Where is COVID when you need it?
| by Anonymous | reply 3 | April 7, 2021 5:22 PM |
Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.
Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!
