Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Sharon Stone says she paid Leonardo DiCaprio's 'The Quick and the Dead' salary because the studio didn't want to hire him

In Sharon Stone's new memoir, "The Beauty of Living Twice," the actress recounts the difficult casting of "The Quick and the Dead," revealing that she paid Leonardo DiCaprio's salary because the studio didn't want to hire him.

In the 1995 western, DiCaprio plays a freewheeling character named The Kid who befriends Stone's Ellen after she moves to a rural town in the Old West.

Stone, who was also a coproducer on the film, wrote in her memoir, published Tuesday, that she and the producers auditioned many teens for the role.

"This kid named Leonardo DiCaprio was the only one who nailed the audition, in my opinion: he was the only one who came in and cried, begging his father to love him as he died in the scene," she recalled in the book.

However, Stone said TriStar Pictures, the studio that produced the film, wasn't keen on hiring DiCaprio, who was starting his career and had yet to star in "Titanic" or "Romeo and Juliet."

"'Why an unknown, Sharon, why are you always shooting yourself in the foot?'" Stone said of the studio's reply. "The studio said if I wanted him so much, I could pay him out of my own salary. So I did."

Stone wrote that she also had to fight for the studio to hire Sam Raimi to direct the movie. At the time, she said, the studio thought of Raimi as a "D-movie director" because of his films "The Evil Dead I" and "Army of Darkness," both of which were low-budget, experimental horrors.

In the end, Stone said, she told the studio that Raimi would "would work nearly for free as an enticement," and he was hired.

Later in the book, Stone speaks at greater length about the difficulties actresses face as producers in the movie business.

"Getting a producer credit as an actress is often thought of in my business as a 'vanity deal,' meaning they pay you for the job but shut the f— up and stay out of the way," Stone wrote.

"I won't accept a vanity deal and let them know that upfront. This is illegal, I say, and I like to work within the law. That gets a lot of silence and not a lot of joy on the other end."

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 21April 1, 2021 6:18 AM

JUST MAKE A SHARON STONE THREAD.

JESUS.

We don’t need a new thread for each thing she said.

by Anonymousreply 1March 31, 2021 1:10 AM

Anyone who discovers a hot twink and makes him into a star deserves my respect. She's up there with George Duroy (for having discovered Johan Paulik).

by Anonymousreply 2March 31, 2021 1:13 AM

[quote] However, Stone said TriStar Pictures, the studio that produced the film, wasn't keen on hiring DiCaprio, who was starting his career and had yet to star in "Titanic" or "Romeo and Juliet."

[quote] "'Why an unknown, Sharon, why are you always shooting yourself in the foot?'" Stone said of the studio's reply. "The studio said if I wanted him so much, I could pay him out of my own salary. So I did."

Shows how much the "expert" producers know.

Actors can see the talent in other actors.

Producers can only see $$$$$$$$.

by Anonymousreply 3March 31, 2021 1:14 AM

Did Leo have to visit Sharon’s casting couch? I could see her pegging him.

by Anonymousreply 4March 31, 2021 1:15 AM

I think I heard this before.

by Anonymousreply 5March 31, 2021 1:25 AM

I assume this was a shit movie because I don't remember anything at all. Did Miss Stone mention that her movies are mostly forgettable?

by Anonymousreply 6March 31, 2021 1:41 AM

Westerns don't usually do well, R6.

I can't think of one Western-themed movie that did well in over 20 years.

I think that maybe Clint Eastwood's "Unforgiven" was probably the only one I can think of, and that was in the 1990's.

by Anonymousreply 7March 31, 2021 1:43 AM

True Grit

by Anonymousreply 8March 31, 2021 1:47 AM

I looked up Unforgiven.

It didn't just do well. It did amazingly well:

[quote] Unforgiven grossed over $159 million on a budget of $14.4 million and received widespread critical acclaim, with praise for the acting (particularly from Eastwood and Hackman), directing, editing, themes and cinematography.

But yeah, it was 1992. Almost 30 years ago.

by Anonymousreply 9March 31, 2021 1:50 AM

r9 It also won best picture. A chunk of that gross came after nominations

by Anonymousreply 10March 31, 2021 1:52 AM

The Quick and the Dead, on the other hand...

[quote] The Quick and the Dead was released in the U.S. on February 10, 1995 in 2,158 theaters, earning $6,515,861 in its opening weekend. The film eventually grossed $18,636,537 in at the US box office and was declared to be a box office bomb.

[quote] Writer Simon Moore noted that the film performed modestly in Europe. The movie grossed $28 million outside the United States, which gives a total gross of $46,636,537

Sad!

I didn't realize what an old movie it was, made in 1995. 26 years old!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 11March 31, 2021 1:52 AM

For anyone who comes up with some good examples of Westerns that succeeded: They have to be amazing to get made. So there's few made but those that are tend to be good.

THE QUICK AND THE DEAD is a great watch for anyone who likes movies. Sam Raimi, Hackman, Russell Crowe and DiCaprio.

by Anonymousreply 12March 31, 2021 1:53 AM

Sharon Stone was very much loved internationally.

by Anonymousreply 13March 31, 2021 1:56 AM

I new Leo was going to make it when I saw the Quick and the Dead...He was just really good. Hated Gilbert Grape.

by Anonymousreply 14March 31, 2021 1:59 AM

Same here, R14.

He was good in GG, but I just didn't like his portrayal of the mentally deficient kid. It was annoying.

Although everyone took notice of him in Titanic (1998), I first saw him as a real actor in The Beach (2000).

But he definitely has star quality, and I'm glad that Sharon Stone saw that in him.

by Anonymousreply 15March 31, 2021 2:02 AM

I loved this movie. Leo DiCaprio was really believable as the unclaimed bastard son of the de facto town sheriff, played by Gene Hackman. Tons of interesting characters.

by Anonymousreply 16March 31, 2021 2:18 AM

Stone in Casino was like a revelation after her back-to-back one note performances as vengeance-minded cyphers in the very similar Quick & the Dead and The Specialist. God, she needed a good director to do great work. Too bad she didn’t do more comedies. Even Basic Instinct allowed her sense of humor to shine through.

by Anonymousreply 17April 1, 2021 4:36 AM

Nobody wanted to see Sharon Stone in a western. Unless it was directed by John Waters.

by Anonymousreply 18April 1, 2021 4:52 AM

"Tombstone" was a sleeper hit in 1993. I remember President Clinton giving it a thumbs up.

by Anonymousreply 19April 1, 2021 4:58 AM

DiCaprio seemed to have been one to watch at the time, I mean he had an Oscar nomination for what’s eating Gilbert grape and had co-started with de Niro in This boys life. Can’t think of many actors in his age group who showed much potential and were names in 1995. Who else were they looking at, Jesse Bradford? Jared Leto?

Anyway I always think how sad for the other actors who auditioned to hear a star like stone say in hindsight how ineffective they were. I’d hate to hear an actor I admire say my audition was bad.

by Anonymousreply 20April 1, 2021 4:59 AM

I listened to John Singleton's DVD commentary for his movie "Higher Learning." He said Leo was his first choice to play the troubled Remy but Leo couldn't do it because of his commitment to "The Quick and the Dead." The part ended up going to Michael Rapaport. For anyone who's seen "Higher Learning", I think Leo would have played a perfect nutcase who gets mixed up with Neo-Nazis.

by Anonymousreply 21April 1, 2021 6:18 AM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!