FILTH!
Meghan's former SUITS costar reads BRF and others for FILTH in a Tweet
by Anonymous | reply 70 | March 6, 2021 2:06 PM |
But you spent no time with her after that. Her true colors came out after.
by Anonymous | reply 1 | March 5, 2021 5:07 PM |
Damn. The hits are coming hard and fast. The daily mail has been ordered to print an apology for a week on the front page. Lipstick Alley alleged employee has just posted the details of the new batch of paid trolls onto black twitter. So everybody is now reading the thread and archiving the paid posts from the 14 so far paid trolls. And the UK media is getting reamed for repeatedly mentioning Meghan Markle and "car crash".
by Anonymous | reply 2 | March 5, 2021 5:08 PM |
How kind of R1, someone who apparently knows her personally and has vast knowledge of her, to stop by and share with us.
by Anonymous | reply 3 | March 5, 2021 5:09 PM |
If only Meghan had the star power of Jen Anniston on Friends or something. The BRF wouldn't fuck around with her. It's nice to see her costars have her back.
by Anonymous | reply 4 | March 5, 2021 5:13 PM |
I can’t stand the BRF and Meghan. Didn’t she know what she was getting into? Good grief! The Queen should’ve forbidden the marriage, Americans don’t get it.
by Anonymous | reply 5 | March 5, 2021 5:16 PM |
BRF?
by Anonymous | reply 6 | March 5, 2021 5:17 PM |
[quote] Jen Anniston
Oh, dear.
by Anonymous | reply 7 | March 5, 2021 5:18 PM |
How much is Harry paying him to tweet that?
by Anonymous | reply 8 | March 5, 2021 5:20 PM |
R6 new here?
by Anonymous | reply 9 | March 5, 2021 5:23 PM |
Important distinction: this person was a peer - an equal - to her; it would be interesting to hear from the people - make up people, caterers, PA, etc - who worked *under* her on Suits would say.
Working for the BRF is a job and these people who are (potentially) complaining about her are underlings who serve tea and make schedules - not exactly Cromwell and probably mostly not people with real power.
So as opposed that indignant diatribe, maybe something more measured like "I take professionalism in the workplace very seriously and I have never had any reason to believe that Meghan acted inappropriately or in an excessively harsh manner." But that's not what he said.
by Anonymous | reply 10 | March 5, 2021 5:26 PM |
[quote]r5 Didn’t she know what she was getting into?
They may have told her a thing or two, but she obviously didn't believe them.
by Anonymous | reply 11 | March 5, 2021 5:28 PM |
Wow! There's like six tweets from this guy about this. He's really desperate to defend her honor.
by Anonymous | reply 12 | March 5, 2021 5:34 PM |
Piers is not happy...
Piers Morgan
@piersmorgan
Actually, what's 'OBSCENE' is your friend trashing her husband's family on global TV as the Queen's 99-yr-old husband lies in hospital. How dare you attack our Royal Family like this, you jumped-up little twerp.
Quote Tweet Patrick J Adams
@halfadams
· 1h It’s OBSCENE that the Royal Family, who’s newest member is currently GROWING INSIDE OF HER, is promoting and amplifying accusations of “bullying” against a woman who herself was basically forced to flea the UK in order protect her family and her own mental health.
Show this thread
11:46 AM · Mar 5, 2021·TweetDeck
101 Retweets 243 Quote Tweets 1,385 Likes
by Anonymous | reply 13 | March 5, 2021 5:38 PM |
Nobody knows who this man is.
by Anonymous | reply 14 | March 5, 2021 5:42 PM |
She sure brought a lot of class into the family.
by Anonymous | reply 15 | March 5, 2021 5:45 PM |
Who?
by Anonymous | reply 16 | March 5, 2021 5:48 PM |
I believe him because he’s cute.
by Anonymous | reply 17 | March 5, 2021 5:50 PM |
[quote]Important distinction: this person was a peer - an equal - to her; it would be interesting to hear from the people - make up people, caterers, PA, etc - who worked *under* her on Suits would say.
EXACTLY. He was one of the leads on the show. She was a supporting actress and this was her first big role.
If the crew, especially in later seasons before her departure, affirms that she was wonderful, then I'd find his comment more credible.
You don't go around pissing off one of the leads of a show and expect to remain employed...unless you're a "favorite" of the showrunners.
by Anonymous | reply 18 | March 5, 2021 5:50 PM |
Fame? Certainly. Prestige? Yes. But power?
by Anonymous | reply 19 | March 5, 2021 5:52 PM |
"You're a powerful Queen in my eyes! ... have you started casting on your Netflix projects yet?"
by Anonymous | reply 20 | March 5, 2021 5:57 PM |
but yeah, I agree - this nobody actor is desperate for attention & he's hitching his wagon to the Smegs train to get it.
Boy is he going to look like an asshole if some poor middle aged woman who used to serve cookies at BP gives some tearful interview about how the Murder Earrings Duchess mercilessly harangued her out of a job.
by Anonymous | reply 21 | March 5, 2021 6:00 PM |
[...]
by Anonymous | reply 22 | March 5, 2021 6:04 PM |
I'm sorry but even if Megs was as crazy as Joan Crawford she still never slept with underage boys on a pedophile island.
But the Queen loves her favorite Andrew so of course he gets a pass.
by Anonymous | reply 23 | March 5, 2021 6:05 PM |
You just want to be invited to Montecito for the weekend. Kiss ass.
by Anonymous | reply 24 | March 5, 2021 6:09 PM |
I love the way he's decided to dictate to the British people what our constitution should be!
I wonder how Harry feels about all this attack on his family. If he didn't realise he was opening a Pandora's Box, he should by now.
by Anonymous | reply 25 | March 5, 2021 6:17 PM |
[quote]I wonder how Harry feels about all this attack on his family.
If there is anyway it could solely be directed at Wills & Chuck, he'd probably love it. But since any criticism includes Big Liz too, that's got to sting
by Anonymous | reply 26 | March 5, 2021 6:20 PM |
R26, this Adams guy is attacking the royal family as an institution, not as individuals. He's really a clueless fucking idiot. Harry is an adolescent who doesn't understand the repercussions of his tantrums.
This Adams guy is also a hypocritical idiot, like most of Markle's apologists. He attacks the concept of the monarch for being outdated, yet no doubt slobbers over the idea that Markle is a Duchess.
by Anonymous | reply 27 | March 5, 2021 6:26 PM |
[...]
by Anonymous | reply 28 | March 5, 2021 6:28 PM |
[quote] I love the way he's decided to dictate to the British people what our constitution should be!
He’s Canadian, so they’re his Royal family, too.
by Anonymous | reply 29 | March 5, 2021 6:34 PM |
Little Thomas Jr looks to be a growing young boy. Time passes so quickly!
by Anonymous | reply 30 | March 5, 2021 6:37 PM |
And The Queen be like, “C-List Actor say what...?”
by Anonymous | reply 31 | March 5, 2021 6:37 PM |
In that case r29, he's confusing his opinion of how he wants to see the constitution of Canada changed with the situation in the UK. It's still not up to him to decide whether the British people should have the royal family as a central element of our constitution.
Since he's Canadian, I wonder if he knows who the mystery Russian billionaire whose mansion complex they lived in when they were staying in Canada for a few months to pretend that what they always really wanted to do was live in LA.
by Anonymous | reply 32 | March 5, 2021 6:41 PM |
Lol, excuse my gibberish at r32, I was typing fast. Try again:
Since he's Canadian, I wonder if he knows the identity of the mystery Russian billionaire whose mansion complex they lived in when they were staying in Canada for a few months to pretend that they were interested in living in a Commonwealth country when what they always really wanted to do was live in LA.
by Anonymous | reply 33 | March 5, 2021 6:43 PM |
True R5.
by Anonymous | reply 34 | March 5, 2021 6:44 PM |
I have nothing against Meghan and Harry but I think Meghan should keep her mouth shut.
She married a royal and entered a world of luxury and influence. Do some good with that, Meghan. Actions speak louder than words.
by Anonymous | reply 35 | March 5, 2021 6:55 PM |
You got noticed, Patrick! For the first time in years. Awesome!
by Anonymous | reply 36 | March 5, 2021 7:43 PM |
[quote]R26 But since any criticism includes Big Liz too, that's got to sting
I love the moniker [italic]Big Liz.[/italic]
Lord knows she’d run a tight cell block.
by Anonymous | reply 37 | March 5, 2021 8:00 PM |
This little turd is just kissing ass. He wants to be invited to Harry and Meghan’s posh parties. Nothing to see here but a dumb British ginger and two D listers clambering for attention.
by Anonymous | reply 38 | March 5, 2021 8:07 PM |
Andrew and his ugly daughters should be exiled from public sight
by Anonymous | reply 39 | March 5, 2021 8:31 PM |
Trying to grab hold of the tailpipe, isn’t he?
Soon a stiletto will daintily wipe him away.
by Anonymous | reply 40 | March 5, 2021 9:15 PM |
Patrick Adams is married to the daughter of Donald Bellisario, so he probably thinks that he married into royalty (Hollywood royalty!), too. And royals (by marriage) have to stick together!
by Anonymous | reply 41 | March 5, 2021 9:35 PM |
Patrick Adams is REALLY queeny in interviews.....His wife is either stupid or doesn't care....
by Anonymous | reply 42 | March 5, 2021 9:39 PM |
Don't you Fraus that infest every royal thread have a shop girl you can go bully?
by Anonymous | reply 43 | March 5, 2021 9:47 PM |
Sparkles had an affair with this down on his luck d-lister. They are very well matched.
by Anonymous | reply 44 | March 5, 2021 9:57 PM |
That r42 interview reminds me that SUITS was actually quite a good show. The romantic leads (Adams and Markle) were the most conventional part of it... some of the supporting cast was really funny.
And a lot of the clothes were killer.
by Anonymous | reply 45 | March 5, 2021 10:07 PM |
I watched a season or two, but there’s something about many USA shows that makes me lose interest.
by Anonymous | reply 46 | March 5, 2021 10:09 PM |
@r44, if you got laid once in awhile you'd be less concerned with the imaginary affairs of others
by Anonymous | reply 47 | March 5, 2021 10:48 PM |
by Anonymous | reply 48 | March 6, 2021 8:35 AM |
“ It’s OBSCENE that the Royal Family, who’s newest member is currently GROWING INSIDE OF HER” - Mary! And oh dear...
by Anonymous | reply 49 | March 6, 2021 9:27 AM |
The queens been out of it the last five years. Charles is unpopular. Brexits a disaster and propels Scotland to independence. The brf would do better addressing the Andrew-Epstein issue and the corruption of the queen’s consent.
So going after Meghan instead will bring the brf to its knees like with dis death.
by Anonymous | reply 50 | March 6, 2021 9:31 AM |
The courtiers no doubt thought that it was their job to train Meghan in royal ways. 'But ma'am, this is how it's been done for centuries...' Of course she balked at that.
by Anonymous | reply 51 | March 6, 2021 10:34 AM |
R50 How exactly is Meghan "bringing the BRF to its knees"?
Please explain.
by Anonymous | reply 52 | March 6, 2021 11:01 AM |
Resorting to a smear campaign to time it with the Oprah show is just the beginning.
I think no one is in charge at Buckingham Palace.
by Anonymous | reply 53 | March 6, 2021 11:15 AM |
Why doesn't the actor correct his "flea" typo on Twitter?
"...a woman who herself was basically forced to flea the UK in order protect her family and her own mental health. "
by Anonymous | reply 55 | March 6, 2021 11:36 AM |
^^ That's your take away after all he wrote? Well aren't you extra special
by Anonymous | reply 56 | March 6, 2021 11:39 AM |
Well, this is easy to settle. Go to her friends and family, and ask them who she really is. They know the truth. Let's hear from her dad and best friend.
by Anonymous | reply 57 | March 6, 2021 12:12 PM |
^^ These ARE her friends speaking, "dad" was more interested in cashing in and the "best friend" was fucking her husband
by Anonymous | reply 58 | March 6, 2021 12:40 PM |
These are co-workers in one of the most duplicitous and sleaziest industries to exist. Who worked with her for at longest a few months at a time. ACTING.
by Anonymous | reply 59 | March 6, 2021 12:52 PM |
[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]
by Anonymous | reply 60 | March 6, 2021 12:56 PM |
R56 Pipe down, asshole. I appreciated his 8 tweets. It's just too bad that he didn't correct the typo because it has been singled out in every article that has reported his defense of MM and dilutes his message.
by Anonymous | reply 61 | March 6, 2021 1:01 PM |
Where are the Clooneys? David Foster? Serena Williams?
Are they saving their comments until after the interview airs? Perhaps they want to see which way the wind blows before stepping in to defend their good friends...?
by Anonymous | reply 62 | March 6, 2021 1:10 PM |
C-list actress behavior on set is vastly different to new royal duchess behavior in palaces with servants.
by Anonymous | reply 63 | March 6, 2021 1:14 PM |
@ r61, "[R56] Pipe down, asshole. I appreciated his 8 tweets. It's just too bad that he didn't correct the typo because it has been singled out in every article that has reported his defense of MM and dilutes his message. "
People who have nothing interesting to contribute focus on spelling errors, you fat loser
by Anonymous | reply 64 | March 6, 2021 1:29 PM |
Well here's Meghan former BFF of 30 years saying that she's "cold" and "calculating" ... but what does she know, right?
by Anonymous | reply 65 | March 6, 2021 1:36 PM |
^^ That's the "friend" that was sleeping with Meghan's husband. Yeah, she's credible
by Anonymous | reply 66 | March 6, 2021 1:45 PM |
[quote] A crew member defends Markle.
Read that tweet more carefully. She doesn’t say she worked on the Suits set or any set with Markle, just that she worked on another, unrelated production in Toronto at the same time.
by Anonymous | reply 67 | March 6, 2021 1:48 PM |
Uh oh. Everyone's waiting for receipts on the tea-throwing episode in Australia now, the RR are on it. Markle was an asshole to many of the women who worked for and around her. Who is surprised though? It's on her griftin' genes I guess.
by Anonymous | reply 68 | March 6, 2021 1:49 PM |
R64 STFU, you dullard. You must be R65 as well. The high school friend turned against MM because she split from Trevor. It is obvious that the high school friend had a thing for Trevor.
by Anonymous | reply 69 | March 6, 2021 1:57 PM |
A wise man once said, "It's show business, not show friends."
Also, there's no one's take I'd rather hear than Trevor's. Imagine what he must think of all this.
by Anonymous | reply 70 | March 6, 2021 2:06 PM |