Who Is Generation Jones? A Micro-Generation Between Boomers, Xers
Who Is Generation Jones? Before Generation X came Generation Jones. This is the micro-generation between Baby Boomers and Generation X that was born during the late 1950s and early 1960s. Read on to learn more about this important generation in American life and politics.
Origin of the Term Generation Jones If not for Jonathan Pontell there might not be a Generation Jones. A cultural historian and political consultant, Pontell coined the term around 1999. This was preceded by extensive research, which concluded that a micro-generation existed between Boomers and Xers. Pontell, who was born in 1960, had a primary thesis: While the 1960s may have impacted him and his contemporaries, they were not shaped by the historic events that shaped Baby Boomers. In particular, Vietnam, Woodstock and hippie culture. In other words, Gen-Jones was “wide-eyed” in the 1960s, not “tie-dyed.”
Following a survey of 650 people, Pontell decided upon the name Generation Jones to identify the cohort. It was specifically inspired by the term jonesing, which is an offshoot of “Keeping up with the Joneses.” It essentially means craving or yearning and ultimately honors the desires of people born in the late 1950s and early 1960s who craved a better qualify of life. After all, they came of age and entered adulthood during the mass unemployment of the 1970s and 80s.
In short, Gen-Jonesers jonesed for a better life. They longed for the prosperous days of freedom their elder siblings enjoyed; days before the collapse of American industries.
Eventually, Pontell was featured in a number of news interviews. He also reportedly wrote a book called Generation Jones. In 1999, several newspapers reported that it was being published by Vanguard Press, however, I can’t locate a copy of it anywhere. In April 2014, the Anniston Star, an Alabama newspaper, again reported that Pontell wrote a book called Generation Jones that Random House was publishing. Again, I can’t locate a copy anywhere.
Offsite Linkby Anonymous | reply 51 | February 26, 2021 4:34 PM
|
Materialistic and status-obsessed.
by Anonymous | reply 1 | February 2, 2021 4:43 AM
|
[Quote] Materialistic and status-obsessed.
Just like every generation before and AFTER it.
by Anonymous | reply 2 | February 2, 2021 4:45 AM
|
This again OP? There is no Generation Jones. It's one guys theory and it's not recognized by most mainstream historians. Wiki is not written by historians.
For Example: Obama was born in 1961. That makes him Gen-X, not Jones, not Boomer. Even though the New York Times pushing to rewrite that history.
Yes, I know the internet is flooded with Gen-x starting at 1965 but that just an inaccurate descriptor created by an insurance company that took hold. The guy who first coined the term Gen-X says 1961. That blows the idea of Jones out of the water. The idea that a generation is just "keeping up with the Jones" is ridiculous.
Offsite Linkby Anonymous | reply 3 | February 2, 2021 5:23 AM
|
The previous Xennials, micro generation (late 70's - early 80's) between GenX & Millennials.
by Anonymous | reply 4 | February 2, 2021 5:27 AM
|
Strictly speaking, Boomers were born between 1946 and 1964. So President Obama is a Boomer.
by Anonymous | reply 5 | February 2, 2021 6:57 AM
|
Oh, stop making new generations. It was fine the way it was.
by Anonymous | reply 7 | February 2, 2021 7:38 AM
|
DL is much too obsessed with generations.
by Anonymous | reply 8 | February 2, 2021 7:40 AM
|
Born in 1963 and I do not relate to anything Boomer rekated. I didn't get drafted for the Vietnam war and don't know anyone my age that has. People my age never ever were drafted for anything. Furthermore, I don't relate to 60s hippie generation. No one I grew up with was a hippie!
by Anonymous | reply 10 | February 2, 2021 7:47 AM
|
Re "Generation Jones" --- that's my family you're talking about - 11th generation in U.S. right here.
"I've got a Jones...runnin' through my bones..."
Offsite Linkby Anonymous | reply 11 | February 2, 2021 8:50 AM
|
Does this micro-generation have micro-meat?
by Anonymous | reply 12 | February 2, 2021 9:09 AM
|
I was born in 1961, and have never been able to identify with the Boomers. I was still a kid during the 60s, and Woodstock was something my parents censored from me.
by Anonymous | reply 13 | February 2, 2021 9:15 AM
|
A proportion of my teachers were hippies or hippy adjacent. Even if I was a kid, the 60s and Vietnam had a big impact on me. I don't feel the need for a special generation for me between boomers and x-ers. I don't identify with one generation I pick and choose what I like and dislike from each generation.
by Anonymous | reply 14 | February 2, 2021 9:27 AM
|
[quote] Even if I was a kid, the 60s and Vietnam had a big impact on me.
I was born in the early 60s, and though I was aware of the Vietnam War because it was on the news, it had no impact on me since I was only a child. The only thing I remember from the 60s is Dark Shadows and other TV shows.
by Anonymous | reply 16 | February 2, 2021 11:41 AM
|
Well, you sound like an isolated oblivious child R16.
I went to Jr HS and HS in the 70s and our teachers spoke and taught about Vietnam, about civil rights, about black power, about colonialism, and several were guys who became teachers because it was a way to avoid the draft! And some were veterans.
And Pop culture was all about the 60s and 70s. The 60s weighed huge on the 70s. My baby sitters were sometimes hippies or ex hippies. As a kid we were all into the rock of the 60s as much as the pop of the 70s.
My mom and dad fought about her going to Woodstock.
I knew all the pop culture of the 60s as a kid. I lived in Metropolitan NY area and was curious. My parents talked a lot of politics.
In the 80s I turned into a materialist yuppie for several years but always had the bohemian spirit behind it.
by Anonymous | reply 17 | February 2, 2021 11:49 AM
|
[quote] I went to Jr HS and HS in the 70s and our teachers spoke and taught about Vietnam, about civil rights, about black power, about colonialism, and several were guys who became teachers because it was a way to avoid the draft! And some were veterans.
Then you went to some kind of radical freak school. I went to middle school and high school in the 70s also, and the teachers taught math, English, science, social studies and history. The only thing close to political was an anti-communism course. The schools I attended were integrated (court ordered with bussing), so we didn’t need to be taught civil rights, we were actually living it.
by Anonymous | reply 18 | February 2, 2021 1:57 PM
|
[quote] And Pop culture was all about the 60s and 70s. The 60s weighed huge on the 70s. My baby sitters were sometimes hippies or ex hippies. As a kid we were all into the rock of the 60s as much as the pop of the 70s.
That’s baloney. As kids in the 70s, the 60s and the 50s were regarded as ancient history. The 50s of course had a nostalgia burst with Happy Days and Grease that kids embraced, but the 60s were put behind us. We had long hair and marijuana, but not much else from the 60s.
by Anonymous | reply 19 | February 2, 2021 2:08 PM
|
Lotsa butthurt Jonesers in this thread!
by Anonymous | reply 21 | February 2, 2021 3:03 PM
|
It's posted r3 because it bothers you soooooooo fucking much. Get over it, cunt. It's real, bitch!
by Anonymous | reply 22 | February 2, 2021 7:09 PM
|
This really isn't that hard - STATISTICALLY the Baby Boom lasted from 1946 - 1964; CULTURALLY those of us born in the early 60's are GenX not Boomer.
by Anonymous | reply 23 | February 2, 2021 8:13 PM
|
Statistically maybe but not culturally. Not psychologically.
I have never considered anyone born in the late 50s to mid 60s a real boomer. It's one thing to be taught about cultural, political and social events and upheavals, it's an entirely different matter to live through and experience them in a way that actually affected your life.
by Anonymous | reply 24 | February 2, 2021 10:51 PM
|
Statistically, it's a bunch of horseshit because the birth rate dropped a lot after 1960.
As a child of 63 I've never identified as a Boomer....I grew up in the 70s and early 80s not the 50s and I was an infant/toddler for most of the 60s.
Trying to label any societal group over that huge span of time (46 to 64) is ridiculous. Early Boomers' lives were drastically different from the so called last Boomers of 60-64.
If a big deal is going to be made over the generations, then they should be broken up into groupings that actually make sense.
by Anonymous | reply 25 | February 3, 2021 5:59 AM
|
Most people who say "Okay, Boomer" don't even know what a boomer is and why we are supposed to hate them.
by Anonymous | reply 29 | February 3, 2021 2:25 PM
|
I'm a Xennial (1978), and I honestly do feel like we're our own thing. I recognize a lot of the Gen X cultural touchstones, but I don't know if they mean quite the same thing for me. I do relate to the Millennial culture, but my outlook is much more like Gen X.
by Anonymous | reply 33 | February 3, 2021 3:37 PM
|
I have much older siblings who are definitely Boomers, but I’ve never considered myself part of their generation. Those of us too young to attend Woodstock, get drafted or be part of the counter culture are outsiders to the whole Boomer thing. I’ve been calling people born from the late 50s to mid 60s the Dazed and Confused Generation, but I’ll take Jones if that sticks.
by Anonymous | reply 34 | February 3, 2021 10:39 PM
|
I wonder how the WWII veterans must have felt when they saw how horrible their kids turned out to be in the 1960s. How did patriotic, clean-cut, law-abiding people begat such loathsome freaks as the hippie generation.
by Anonymous | reply 35 | February 3, 2021 10:45 PM
|
DLers are most definitely obsessed with generations.
It seems a good (and obvious) rule of thumb is that for people on the bubble, your birth order likely determines which generation you connect with.
So someone born in 1963 who had older siblings/cousins and grew up with hippies and Vietnam being part of the family dynamic is probably more in tune with Boomers, while someone born that year who was the oldest child and had Gen X siblings and cousins would be more likely to identify with Gen X.
Also fairly safe to say that the parents of the 1963 youngest child were older, lived through the Depression and dad was a WW2 vet, while parents of the 1963 oldest child were much younger and were likely teenagers in the 1950s, which would thus create very different environments at home.
by Anonymous | reply 36 | February 3, 2021 10:48 PM
|
I think R36 is right. The early Boomers were mostly the children of the Greatest Generation.
As the 50s went on, more and more of the Silent Generation (29 to 45) took over as parents so by the time you get to the late 50s/early 60s, most of our parents were those Depression era generation and the early WWII generation. My parents were born in 36 and 38 and most of my peers parents were born in the 30s or very early 40s.
There's a world of difference growing up with parents who had to struggle through the Depression years then the war years as adults versus having parents who were just BORN in those years and were kids through that time frame.
by Anonymous | reply 38 | February 4, 2021 5:40 AM
|
Just as other posters born in the early 60’s have stated, I never related to Boomers. I have always called those born between 1959 and 1964 “in betweener” because we have some characteristics of Boomers and Gen X.
by Anonymous | reply 39 | February 4, 2021 12:09 PM
|
[quote] I have always called those born between 1959 and 1964 “in betweener” because we have some characteristics of Boomers and Gen X.
Can you provide a few examples of characteristics we share with Boomers?
by Anonymous | reply 40 | February 4, 2021 12:15 PM
|
You’re older than me R33 and I refer to myself as Generation X. “Xennial” are for those who want to appear younger than they actually are.
Offsite Linkby Anonymous | reply 41 | February 4, 2021 12:20 PM
|
R3 - I believe there is something to this. I was born in 1962 and really have nothing in common with Boomers whose parents were of The Greatest generation and fought WWII. My parents were very late depression era babies. There definitely is about a four notch between Baby Boomers and Generation X of people who do fit into either category based on the way they were raised and major events they experienced which affected their lives. I do not consider myself a baby boomer and certainly do consider myself Generation X.
by Anonymous | reply 43 | February 4, 2021 4:27 PM
|
Apparently, generation is a state of mind.
Offsite Linkby Anonymous | reply 44 | February 4, 2021 10:24 PM
|
[quote] For Example: Obama was born in 1961. That makes him Gen-X, not Jones, not Boomer.
But according to the current (broken) yardstick for boomers, he’s a boomer.
The end date of 1965 (iirc) for boomers is beyond ridiculous. That’s why people are flogging this “mini-generation.” Obama and I (I was born in 1963) are gen x. We were both latchkey kids. I was a teen when MTV started up. I was a teen when the PC revolution started. Neither one of us were born as a result of GIs coming home from the war and making babies. We were both too young to be teens during the late 60s.
Rather than create some bogus mini gen, more institutions need to accept that the boom was over by 60 and gen x started in 61. (Some already do.)
by Anonymous | reply 47 | February 11, 2021 5:26 PM
|
R36 is spot on.
Aa as side note, for some odd reason his post is blocked out. (I can only see it because others have cited his post). I have no one on ignore.
by Anonymous | reply 49 | February 11, 2021 7:03 PM
|
People born between 1962 and 1965 cannot be Boomers. I just do not see how no matter what expert says what.
by Anonymous | reply 50 | February 11, 2021 7:12 PM
|
[quote]Sign in window of coffee house, rural northern Virginia:
Hippies use side door
Offsite Linkby Anonymous | reply 51 | February 26, 2021 4:34 PM
|