So, 1/28 was the (35th) anniversary of the Challenger explosion and 2/1 is the (18th) anniversary of the Columbia disaster. I was a little kid when Challenger happened and a youngish adult when Columbia happened.
This morning, I jumped down one of those weird archival news rabbit holes that can be very tempting on a Sunday morning, and Googled everything I could about the two disasters.
Something I noticed is how comparatively open and forthcoming NASA and crash authorities were about the causes and impacts of the Columbia disaster. Challenger, even to this day, seems shrouded in the kind of paranoid secrecy that (imo) feeds conspiracy theories, tacky jokes, and lurid speculation (which I heard a LOT of in connection with Challenger, at the time, and almost nothing with Columbia).
Do you think this is true, and if so, why? Is it because Challenger happened during the Late Cold War era and the politics were different?