Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Michelle Obama calls on social media companies to permanently ban Trump

Former first lady Michelle Obama called on social media companies to permanently ban Donald Trump from their platforms in the wake of Wednesday’s attack on the U.S. Capitol by the president’s supporters.

“Now is the time for Silicon Valley companies to stop enabling this monstrous behavior — and go even further than they have already by permanently banning this man from their platforms and putting in place policies to prevent their technology from being used by the nation’s leaders to fuel insurrection,” Obama wrote in her statement.

In response to the riot by thousands of Trump supporters which police said resulted in the deaths of four people, Facebook announced Thursday that it was banning Trump until at least Jan. 20, the end of his presidential term. Twitter has not yet banned Trump, but over the past few months began adding warning labels to his tweets. On Wednesday, as violence raged in Washington, the site removed a handful of tweets posted by the president and blocked him from posting for 12 hours. His last post, at 6:01 p.m. on Wednesday, was a defense of the rioters, which read: “These are the things and events that happen when a sacred landslide election victory is so unceremoniously & viciously stripped away from great patriots who have been badly & unfairly treated for so long. Go home with love & in peace. Remember this day forever!” Twitter has taken it down.

YouTube, which is owned by Google, removed a video Trump had posted Wednesday in which he praised the rioters and continued to make false claims about the 2020 election.

Trump has often bragged that he uses social media to bypass what he calls the “fake news media,” so as to spread his message directly to his supporters. On Twitter, his favorite platform, Trump boasts 88.7 million followers, which makes him the sixth-most-followed user. Former President Barack Obama is first, with 128 million; the other top five, in order, are Justin Bieber, Katy Perry, Rihanna and soccer star Cristiano Ronaldo.

When the platform began adding warning labels to Trump’s tweets, angry conservatives began migrating to Parler, another social media site less likely to flag inaccurate posts by users.

In her statement, Obama also described her horror at watching the mob descend on the Capitol.

“Like all of you, I watched as a gang — organized, violent, and mad they’d lost an election — laid siege to the United States Capitol. They set up gallows. They proudly waved the traitorous flag of the Confederacy through the halls,” Obama said. “They desecrated the center of American government. And once authorities finally gained control of the situation, these rioters and gang members were led out of the building not in handcuffs, but free to carry on with their days."

In speeches earlier on Thursday, President-elect Joe Biden and Vice President-elect Kamala Harris both decried the disparity in the way the pro-Trump mob and Black Lives Matter protesters had been treated in the nation’s capital.

Mrs. Obama, who has been outspoken about her disdain for Trump, said that along with the president, far-right-wing media outlets also bore responsibility for what had transpired on Wednesday.

“The day was a fulfillment of the wishes of an infantile and unpatriotic president who can’t handle the truth of his own failures. And the wreckage lays at the feet of a party and media apparatus that gleefully cheered him on, knowing full well the possibility of consequences like these,” Obama said.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 126January 10, 2021 9:14 AM

I tell a rethug tranny that it needs it’s man face slapped and get my account suspended for months and Trump is allowed to say whatever the fuck he wants, fucking twitter!

by Anonymousreply 1January 8, 2021 5:45 AM

I'm so much prettier and cheerful. And some of you wanted to Joe to pick this sourpuss.

by Anonymousreply 2January 8, 2021 5:45 AM

What a hateful bitch.

by Anonymousreply 3January 8, 2021 5:55 AM

This is why I love Michelle Obama, she doesn't give a fuck! She gets straight to to point, no nonsense at all.

She asking for exactly what needs to done. Trump needs to be banned completely from all social media platforms.

She's a former first lady, and they just might do because she asked for it.

by Anonymousreply 4January 8, 2021 5:55 AM

Trump can use Parler.

by Anonymousreply 5January 8, 2021 5:57 AM

R2, she's 56

by Anonymousreply 6January 8, 2021 5:58 AM

Ask Jack Dorsey and Mark Zuckerberg.

by Anonymousreply 7January 8, 2021 5:58 AM

That go higher shit obviously shouldn't apply to her herself.

#hypocrite

by Anonymousreply 8January 8, 2021 5:58 AM

When they go low, shit all over them.

by Anonymousreply 9January 8, 2021 6:00 AM

R8, you can't possibly be serious, you fucking psycho. Are you fucking kidding me? Were you asleep yesterday, you cunt?

by Anonymousreply 10January 8, 2021 6:00 AM

R3 = DJT.

Aren't you supposed to call her a "nasty woman?"

by Anonymousreply 11January 8, 2021 6:01 AM

[quote]What a hateful bitch.

Do you recognize how repugnant you truly are or are you deranged?

by Anonymousreply 12January 8, 2021 6:03 AM

[quote]Aren't you supposed to call her a "nasty woman?"

I don't think she's nasty, I think she's being hateful.

by Anonymousreply 13January 8, 2021 6:12 AM

R13

You're a heterosexual, aren't you? And a republican?

by Anonymousreply 14January 8, 2021 6:15 AM

she's a lawyer, doesn't she believe in free speech?

by Anonymousreply 15January 8, 2021 6:18 AM

R15 He can go spout his crazy bullshit at the nearest bus stop like every other Loonie.

by Anonymousreply 16January 8, 2021 6:20 AM

R15

Are you genuinely that ignorant or typing from an eastern european troll farm or both?

Social media companies are private entities. You have no right to free speech on their platforms.

Just like if you said stupid shit in my house, I would be legally entitled to throw you out.

by Anonymousreply 17January 8, 2021 6:30 AM

I don't disagree with banning Trump. But if all the mainstream social media platforms like Facebook and Twitter ban Trump and other extremists, alternative platforms will emerge to fill the void and cater to them. And those platforms will be even more vile and less regulated. At least on Twitter or Facebook, the nutjobs get some rebuttals and backlash from sane, rational people. If the nutjobs all migrate to sites just for nutjobs, then there will be even more of an echo chamber and they will never be exposed to anyone with a different point of view. There really is no good solution.

by Anonymousreply 18January 8, 2021 6:34 AM

[quote]I don't think she's nasty, I think she's being hateful.

Trolling, right? If not, you're not normal. Don't ever think you are.

by Anonymousreply 19January 8, 2021 6:36 AM

R18 Those places already exist Rose. They just are not mainstream, which is how it should be.

by Anonymousreply 20January 8, 2021 6:37 AM

R17 You'd be legally entitled to throw anyone out of you house speech or no speech but, not allowing people to express opinions or thoughts we don't like or agree with on social media platforms is different.

by Anonymousreply 21January 8, 2021 6:39 AM

[quote] Those places already exist Rose.

Believe me. I'm quite well aware of that.

by Anonymousreply 22January 8, 2021 6:40 AM

r6 47 is not my age. It's what number president I'll be come say August or so.

by Anonymousreply 23January 8, 2021 6:42 AM

[quote] You'd be legally entitled to throw anyone out of you house speech or no speech but, not allowing people to express opinions or thoughts we don't like or agree with on social media platforms is different.

No, it's not. The First Amendment only protects you from the GOVERNMENT stopping you from speaking. Social media platforms are private businesses. They're not the government. They can ban anybody for any reason they want (as long as it's not discrimination based on a legally protected class like race, sex, etc.). Nobody has a First Amendment right to post on social media.

by Anonymousreply 24January 8, 2021 6:43 AM

R21, accept your limitations. First of all, spreading lies about the election and inciting hate, is tantamount to screaming fire, it is not "free speech" for the fucking president of the US to continually lie which then leads to psychos trying to take down the govt and attempting to arrest MoC. Why are you pretending that what he has been soind isn't dangerous beyond belief?

Second, make him Muslim and saying "we have to take over," would you say that was "free speech"? Muslims get arrested for online "terrorist threats" for the same shit Trump and his followers say.

I agree with the other poster that you must not be American or you're clearly dumb if you still have no clue what "free speech" means in this country.

by Anonymousreply 25January 8, 2021 6:45 AM

soind = doing

by Anonymousreply 26January 8, 2021 6:45 AM

[quote]....alternative platforms will emerge to fill the void and cater to them. And those platforms will be even more vile and less regulated. At least on Twitter or Facebook, the nutjobs get some rebuttals and backlash from sane, rational people.

Yes. This will make it easier for the new FBI anti-racism and domestic terrorism task force to find and permanently 'silence' terrorists.

They tried to kill me yesterday. I am no longer in the mood...

by Anonymousreply 27January 8, 2021 6:48 AM

R21

I need to explain high school level civics to you?!?!

The term 'free speech' refers to citizens having the freedom to express themselves without governmental suppression. It is entirely irrelevant to PRIVATE spaces and platforms. Your speech is not 'free' there, never has been, and never was intended to be.

Holy shit. Assuming you're an american, which I'm skeptical of, damn are you an embarrassment to our public schools.

by Anonymousreply 28January 8, 2021 6:49 AM

Civics?

r28 must be very very old. They haven't taught civics for decades.

by Anonymousreply 29January 8, 2021 6:51 AM

I am so sick of this woman and her Angela Davis tribute act. Shut up, Michelle!

by Anonymousreply 30January 8, 2021 6:52 AM

Wow, she’s wildly unattractive.

by Anonymousreply 31January 8, 2021 6:54 AM

^This.

by Anonymousreply 32January 8, 2021 6:54 AM

They need to treat social media as if it was publishing which it is.

Lie on the internet--get sued for slander/libel. And if you lie, you are permanently banned from all social media with heavy financial penalties if you create a fake account somewhere. The media platforms are legally responsible for maintaining the legality of their content. Otherwise--fines commensurate with their profits.

by Anonymousreply 33January 8, 2021 6:55 AM

R28

I'm in my thirties. I just like the sound of 'civics' class as a term. You know what I meant, of course. I also called Tom Perez a milksop in another thread, but being familiar with early 20th century slang doesn't also mean that I'm a vampire or something.

Or... maybe I am... An ooze vampire...

by Anonymousreply 34January 8, 2021 6:58 AM

R28, R29 He sounds as older than Biden!

by Anonymousreply 35January 8, 2021 7:01 AM

She isn’t wrong. I’ve been saying this for months. Just because he is the president doesn’t mean he is owed a fucking Twitter!

by Anonymousreply 36January 8, 2021 7:02 AM

[quote] Lie on the internet--get sued for slander/libel.

If you lie on the Internet and harm someone's reputation, you CAN get sued for libel.

[quote] The media platforms are legally responsible for maintaining the legality of their content.

That sounds good in theory. But for a platform like Twitter or Facebook, where there are millions or billions of posts every day 24/7, there is no way they can monitor every single post to make sure it's not libelous.

by Anonymousreply 37January 8, 2021 7:03 AM

R35

Would it make you feel like less of an ignorant, knuckle-dragging lowlife if I told you that I was 89 years old?

I'll be 89 for you, champ. Just for today.

by Anonymousreply 38January 8, 2021 7:04 AM

R24 Your home and social media platforms are different which was my point. You can throw anyone out of your home for any reason but there are restrictions on social media platforms as you pointed out.

by Anonymousreply 39January 8, 2021 7:21 AM
Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 40January 8, 2021 7:27 AM

R39

No, in relation to 'free speech', my home and social media platforms are NOT different. They are privately owned spaces in which you are not entitled to any freedom of expression.

You can be thrown out of my home and thrown off of social media platforms for saying anything.

Once the pandemic is under control, go to a public library and ask for help at the reference desk.

by Anonymousreply 41January 8, 2021 7:30 AM

So sick of this woman and her black rage. She and Trump are two sides of the same coin.

by Anonymousreply 42January 8, 2021 7:30 AM

R25, R28 What triggered your response? I was indicating that you can throw anyone out of you home for any reason, no restrictions or explanations needed and that is different from social media platforms and my point had nothing to do with first amendment or free speech. I was indicating that the two things compared were not analogous. I think R25 and R28 should calm down and maybe take a break from social media.

by Anonymousreply 43January 8, 2021 7:35 AM

R42

You're really, reeaaaallllyy embarrassing yourself.

Jesus, try some subtlety.

Is it the day off for our usual rightwing trolls? This... is just pathetic.

Please take a trolling training course and come back when you're better prepared.

by Anonymousreply 44January 8, 2021 7:36 AM

Lol R44 I had exactly the same thought when i read R42's post. That's some unsubtle shit-stirrin' right there. That one's not in a neon-lit warehouse in a Moscow suburb, it's in a hole in the ground with a tarp over it in rural Bulgaria. I'm almost insulted - isn't DL worthy of the top-level trolls?!

by Anonymousreply 45January 8, 2021 7:42 AM

R44 It's possible to dislike both Donald Trump and Michelle Obama, you know. They really are two sides of the same coin - the same stupid, incoherent anger. Both high on their self-righteousness.

Michelle's not gonna like that she is no longer Queen of Black America. Enter Kamala, stage left. At least we won't have to see Michelle's ugly face contorted with rage anymore.

by Anonymousreply 46January 8, 2021 7:49 AM

R46 In “Black America” Michelle is Beyonce, Kamala is whatshername, Kelly? Deal with it fuckwad!

by Anonymousreply 47January 8, 2021 7:53 AM

R45

I know. WTF. It's like we got downgraded on some priority list of forums for the troll farms to target. Like we've been handed off to the 'Child Labor Troll Farm'.

Damn you, Putin! Datalounge deserves better than this shit.

by Anonymousreply 48January 8, 2021 7:53 AM

R15 that's not her point, Twitter/FB are private companies, (believe in) free speech or not, it's up to the company to decide whether Trump or anyone including Obama herself can stay on their platform, just like your neighbors can ask you to leave their property for any reason or no reasons at all, it's their home and they make the rules, they do not owe you an explanation.

by Anonymousreply 49January 8, 2021 7:59 AM

[quote] Your home and social media platforms are different which was my point.

No, they AREN'T different in the eyes of the law, which was my point.

[quote] You can throw anyone out of your home for any reason but there are restrictions on social media platforms as you pointed out.

No, I didn't point that out. My point was that there are NOT restrictions on social media platforms.

by Anonymousreply 50January 8, 2021 8:02 AM

R25 R50 You said they can ban anyone they want as long as it's not discrimination.. There's no as long as regarding your home.

by Anonymousreply 51January 8, 2021 8:07 AM

"Official" social media platforms like Facebook and Twitter pretty much legitimize Trump's rants by letting them go unchecked in the past. Same thing with "official" news media outlets like CNN or Fox News (which, btw., isn't allowed to call itself a news media channel legally).

Once he's banned it signals that he and his message branding are toxic. Going on Parler doesn't matter since all he does there is preaching to the choir. Sure, for a snake oil salesmen that means he can scam his followers out of their money offering them merchandise and all sorts of snake oils for various purposes, but long term he doesn't get new followers, because he doesn't have the mainstream's attention anymore at Parler. And the Parler crowd will either go broke or move on to some new hot shot snake oil salesmen who has still mainstream appeal by being on "official" social media and seen on "official" news media.

by Anonymousreply 52January 8, 2021 8:08 AM

My apologies. It's snake oil salesman.

by Anonymousreply 53January 8, 2021 8:09 AM

[quote] You said they can ban anyone they want as long as it's not discrimination..

Discrimination, as in sex discrimination or race discrimination. If Facebook banned all black people, yes, that could lead to a discrimination lawsuit. But that's not the issue here, and that's not what this thread is about, is it? Trump is a white man. Social media platforms could ban Trump for any reason they want. They wouldn't even have to give a reason.

by Anonymousreply 54January 8, 2021 8:13 AM

R51 oh no some of you got it wrong, non discrimination is their statement/goal/rule, but they have no "legal" obligation to follow that rule, they can ban users for being gay, being black...or simply for posting too many cat photos, it may not look good to the public and they definitely will lose users and advertisers, and they shareholders will have a problem with that, but in theory they definitely can, why do you think clan churches/hate groups can legally exist in the US?

by Anonymousreply 55January 8, 2021 8:18 AM

r54, race is a protected class.

Facebook could, say, ban racists because they are not on-brand for them.

And let's not forget that Paypal and some credit card companies don't allow their services to be used with anything porn or sex related.

You think porn studios or porn consumers have a case for being denied by Paypal?

by Anonymousreply 56January 8, 2021 8:21 AM

You bitches criticizing Michelle Obama are doing it for what reason exactly? Because she is speaking her mind unafraid? What happened at the Capitol was disgusting and Trump fueled the flames of hate with things like "I could shoot a man in the middle of 5th Avenue...". Michelle is a lovely woman and so is Kamala, regardless of race...this isn't some black woman beauty contest, this is our nation and two educated women. Grow up ffs.

Never been with a black woman even in the days I did screw around with women, but I would consider myself lucky if either looked at me. Hell, hard enough being gay...in such a racist shit show world imagine going from gay to interracial. And yes, I am typing from Eastern Europe and I personally agree with Michelle. Enough of this jerk!

by Anonymousreply 57January 8, 2021 8:24 AM

[quote] [R54], race is a protected class.

I know. That's what I said.

[quote] Facebook could, say, ban racists because they are not on-brand for them.

Of course.

[quote] You think porn studios or porn consumers have a case for being denied by Paypal?

No, of course not.

As I said in my posts, you can be banned for any reason you want, as long as it's not discrimination based on a protected class like race or sex. I'm not sure why you're arguing with me when I'm making the same point as you.

by Anonymousreply 58January 8, 2021 8:26 AM

Dems never learn. The more you all are treating Trump like shit the more his supporters will see him as a martyr. I find it very hard to understand what the Democrats have been playing in over the last few years. What you're doing is giving him material to victimize and you're surprised that his fans are invading the Capitol? When are you going to learn?

He had to be ignored as much as possible before he left. On the other hand, in a real democracy, social media bosses do not have to meddle in politics. It is not their place. Whether they own it or not, they make money from the millions of registered accounts. You're just going to create something worse than Trump, but since you never listen and you're persuaded that you know it all....

I give up, I've had enough

by Anonymousreply 59January 8, 2021 8:27 AM

r58, my bad. I apologize.

by Anonymousreply 60January 8, 2021 8:28 AM

R57 A former First Lady should withdraw graciously from the national stage, not give incendiary hate-filled speechrants. Still, her star will now fade that Biden-Harris are in charge.

by Anonymousreply 61January 8, 2021 8:32 AM

R59

"Dems" are about to control the presidency, the senate, and the house of representatives.

If we want advice on how to elect a dangerous, compulsively lying, orange, neo-nazi sociopath to destroy our party, we'll come to you for advice.

Otherwise, you can sit this one out.

by Anonymousreply 62January 8, 2021 8:37 AM

R42 Black rage? Seeing as how BLM protesters/rioters are attacked with rubber bullets and tear gas, whilst Trump rioters are escorted into the Capitol by law enforcement and even taking selfie’s together....I’d say she has a right to be outraged.

by Anonymousreply 63January 8, 2021 8:43 AM

R62 And you are talking like a so called peaceful Dems. Be carefull, next time his supporters will do something worse because of pretentious brainless like you. No wonder why there are millions people voting for Trump. I'm starting to get it now judging by your behavor. I'm an European and the way you are acting here is not better than what he does. You should be asshamed but the entire world knows you won't. Your decline is even predictable now. Good luck with your "we control" it all. You're so stupid I pity you.

by Anonymousreply 64January 8, 2021 8:45 AM

R64 is triggered.

by Anonymousreply 65January 8, 2021 8:48 AM

R65 is 5 years old...

.................Or retarded

by Anonymousreply 66January 8, 2021 8:50 AM

R66 is a fat middle aged frau infiltrating DL pretending to be a gay man.

by Anonymousreply 67January 8, 2021 8:52 AM

R67 Honey, Obesity is all over your country not mine. We know what food is here.

Go eat your disgusting junk food and don't act you know anything about being gay. You are a fck troll here. Nothing else.

by Anonymousreply 68January 8, 2021 8:56 AM

"It's possible to dislike both Donald Trump and Michelle Obama, you know. "

Sure.

"They really are two sides of the same coin - the same stupid, incoherent anger."

Oh, honey. You have the exact opposite of pattern recognition. Are you one of those people who think his wife is a hat, or something else Oliver Sacks would have written a book about?

"Both high on their self-righteousness."

No, that's you. Which is funny because it's based on being an outrage troll.

You know being and actual troll doll is better.

Maybe you should aspire to this:

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 69January 8, 2021 8:56 AM

Bye no life

by Anonymousreply 70January 8, 2021 8:57 AM

R68 I told you to go wash out your pussy. You stink.

by Anonymousreply 71January 8, 2021 9:05 AM

Michelle Obama saying what any sane, rational human would say makes her an angry black woman and an Angela Davis tribute act? In that case maybe what this world needs right now are more angry black women.

Why on earth should she have to take the high road on this one? Trump and his loons committed an act of terror.

by Anonymousreply 72January 8, 2021 9:19 AM

R14 of course it’s a fucking Karen. Can’t you smell her musty old clam?

by Anonymousreply 73January 8, 2021 9:28 AM

Wow, what a face.....

by Anonymousreply 75January 8, 2021 9:38 AM

R74

Have you ever been introduced to the concept of 'false equivalence'?

Let me introduce you.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 76January 8, 2021 9:46 AM

[quote]No wonder why there are millions people voting for Trump. I'm starting to get it now judging by your behavor. I'm an European and the way you are acting here is not better than what he does.

Christ this is getting old. If i had a dollar for every whining snowflake pissing and moaning about 'but the libruls maaaaaade me do it! I was all for love and understanding until a librul wuz mean to me and then I obviously had to go full Trumper! it's all their fault I'm garbage!" I'd be one of those rich elites you say you hate so much.

Nah. Nah, fam. Are you a legally competent adult? Because if the answer is yes you need to accept that your beliefs and values and the actions you take based on those beliefs and values are YOUR responsibility alone. You're doing the exact same thing all those shithead incels do. "But women made us this way! If only they would fuck us we would be the bestest boyfriends ever and stop saying women are dumb whores!"

Fuck off. Also, get a new spin, I've been seeing this from sealioning trolls since 2015 ffs.

by Anonymousreply 77January 8, 2021 10:01 AM

[quote]You should be asshamed but the entire world knows you won't. Your decline is even predictable now. Good luck with your "we control" it all. You're so stupid I pity you.

You're literally whining about someone being insulting and patronizing to the Trumpers by being even more insulting and patronizing yourself. You people just don't do irony, do you?

Be the change you wish to see in the world, little Eurosnowflake.

by Anonymousreply 78January 8, 2021 10:03 AM

R78 that tard isn’t from Europe. It’s an American. They come in here and act like we are too stupid to figure it out. Why the fuck would somebody from Europe give this much of a shit about Trump or any of our politics? It’s a frau cosplaying.

by Anonymousreply 79January 8, 2021 10:27 AM
Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 80January 8, 2021 10:27 AM

She does look good for her age. Black don't crack (and all that).

by Anonymousreply 81January 8, 2021 10:39 AM

[quote] Dems never learn. The more you all are treating Trump like shit the more his supporters will see him as a martyr.

R59 is clearly a troll.

Look, cunt. Nobody cares what Trump or his MAGATS think.

He's done. They're done.

by Anonymousreply 82January 8, 2021 12:34 PM

Censorship of hate speech is necessary for a civil society. Fuck freezepeach.

by Anonymousreply 83January 8, 2021 12:39 PM

[quote] She does look good for her age. Black don't crack (and all that).

Black supremacy is rooted in scientific fact, unlike white supremacy, as every election this century has proven.

by Anonymousreply 84January 8, 2021 12:39 PM

It is way past time to get rid of the First Amendment. If her husband had done so when he had the chance, then Trump would never have become President in the first place. We need a military dictatorship just as long as it's marching in from the left.

by Anonymousreply 85January 8, 2021 12:41 PM

Free speech doesn't allow you to tell "fire!" In a crowded theater, for instance. That's what Dump has been doing for two months

by Anonymousreply 86January 8, 2021 12:44 PM

That's what the GOP has been doing since 1854.

by Anonymousreply 87January 8, 2021 12:45 PM

[quote] Black supremacy is rooted in scientific fact, unlike white supremacy, as every election this century has proven.

Or we could just see each other as equals, and dispense with this "supremacy" crap.

It's the root of much evil.

[quote] We need a military dictatorship just as long as it's marching in from the left.

No we don't.

Nobody ever needs a military dictatorship.

by Anonymousreply 88January 8, 2021 12:46 PM

If I hear one more deplorable flog George Orwell's corpse around, I'm going to call for the formation of a literal Ministry of Truth and the institution of Newspeak just to shut them the fuck up for good!

by Anonymousreply 89January 8, 2021 12:46 PM

[quote] Or we could just see each other as equals, and dispense with this "supremacy" crap. It's the root of much evil.

But it's fucking true, that's the problem. Trump alone is proof that Blacks are superior to whites.

by Anonymousreply 90January 8, 2021 12:47 PM

At least Trump tried to do something about his whiteness by becoming a person of color.

by Anonymousreply 91January 8, 2021 12:50 PM

Please stop, R90.

What you're doing is VERY counter-productive to our nation coming together after four years of chaos and divisiveness.

We're had enough of that crap. And we have much bigger things to worry about right now.

by Anonymousreply 92January 8, 2021 12:52 PM

We are just getting started, collaborator R92.

by Anonymousreply 93January 8, 2021 12:53 PM

Anyone preaching that "you're no better" crap might just as well be a Trump-loving deplorable.

by Anonymousreply 94January 8, 2021 12:53 PM

[quote] We are just getting started, collaborator

[quote] Anyone preaching that "you're no better" crap might just as well be a Trump-loving deplorable.

Sure, Boris.

You're really getting off on seeing our country split down the middle and go down in flames, aren't you?

You'd love nothing more than to see our country fall.

Anyone preaching more violence and hate right now, is not an American. You're a Russian plant, still trying to sow seeds of discord.

Enemies of our country, who need us to be divided and weak.

I see the Russian propaganda is still alive and well on the internet.

by Anonymousreply 95January 8, 2021 12:59 PM

You hate Russia because it is a majority white country. Just admit it.

by Anonymousreply 96January 8, 2021 1:00 PM

[quote]Anyone preaching more violence and hate right now, is not an American. You're a Russian plant, still trying to sow seeds of discord.

Xenophobia! Xenophobia! Force the vote! Force the vote!

by Anonymousreply 97January 8, 2021 1:01 PM

I agree 1 million % with Michelle Obama.

Ban him. I've got a feeling Twitter will ban him at least.

He can knock himself out on Parler and NewsMax.

by Anonymousreply 99January 8, 2021 1:03 PM

[quote]a rethug tranny

The case for gulags gets stronger every damn day.

by Anonymousreply 100January 8, 2021 1:04 PM

R63 Riots by BLM thugs were praised to the skies and described as 'mostly peaceful protests' even as they burned their way through American cities last summer. Meanwhile, Democratic politicians were taking the knee to show their support. The Obamas could have helped put an end to it, but they didn't. Michelle Obama is a disgusting race-obsessed lunatic.

by Anonymousreply 101January 8, 2021 3:50 PM

I eat piles of shit!

by Anonymousreply 103January 8, 2021 4:21 PM

I, too, eat enormous piles of fresh shit!!

by Anonymousreply 104January 8, 2021 4:21 PM

R102 MOTHERFUCKER. The BLM protests were infiltrated by MAGA and Proud TERRORISTS - and we have plenty of pics and video of them inciting and participating in violence - and get this, NO GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS WERE IN HARMS WAY NOR WAS OUR FUCKING CAPITOL UNDER SIEGE.

I wish BLM had driven several cars into that mob on Wednesday the way they had done to them during peaceful protests.

by Anonymousreply 105January 8, 2021 4:46 PM

[quote]That's what the GOP has been doing since 1854.

Really? So you're a supporter of the Confederacy?

by Anonymousreply 106January 8, 2021 5:31 PM

These assholes know that Boogaloo Boys are in custody right now because they killed cops and tried to frame Antifa and BLM for it. They know the protests were infiltrated by cops and alt-right militia types. They don't care. They're going to come to these threads and whine about Michelle Obama being "hateful" and a "cunt." They don't have anything else to do in their lives.

by Anonymousreply 107January 8, 2021 5:35 PM

[quote]You hate Russia because it is a majority white country. Just admit it.

The black supremacist troll also posted this, I guess his lazy ass couldn't use two accounts when he was trying to play both sides.

by Anonymousreply 108January 8, 2021 5:36 PM

The only CUNT is you, R102.

And Trump. And Melania. And Ivanka. And Don Jr. And Bitch McConnell. And Miss Lindz.

You're all a bunch of dirty cunts!

by Anonymousreply 109January 8, 2021 5:43 PM

R84 R85 R90 R92 are trolls, likely the same troll. If anyone is confused about what a troll is or what it does, this is a textbook case. The "black supremacy" troll is 100% a white person, posting here to piss off white people and make us fearful of other races. Please don't fall for this basic level fuckery.

General rule: is a post attempting to incite you to hate a particular group of people? Then take it with some large grains of salt.

by Anonymousreply 110January 8, 2021 9:47 PM

r42 Where is the Black rage in calling for Trump's ban on social media?

Are you saying that because she's Black she shouldn't express her anger about Trump or she will be considered as having "Black rage"?

If she's upset about anything and expresses it she's having "Black rage"?

Or is she someone who is pissed off about Trump and expressing it and you are choosing to label her as having "Black rage" because you are racist?

by Anonymousreply 111January 8, 2021 9:54 PM

[quote]you are choosing to label her as having "Black rage" because you are racist?

DING DING DING!

by Anonymousreply 112January 8, 2021 9:57 PM

She'll get no argument from me. At this point they have all the grounds they need to ban him from their platforms.

by Anonymousreply 113January 8, 2021 10:10 PM

R111 Ooooh, looks like I touched a nerve. A bit sensitive about the mention of 'black rage', are we? Noted.

by Anonymousreply 114January 8, 2021 10:18 PM

R114 I'm white as a ghost but you're clearly a fucking vile, racist piece of shit, so don't try to play winky winky coy, bitch.

by Anonymousreply 115January 8, 2021 10:25 PM

Also white as a ghost. Can also see R114's giant flashing "I'M A RACIST!" sign. Get fucked you inbred. *smiles and waves*

by Anonymousreply 116January 8, 2021 11:19 PM

Ahem.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 117January 9, 2021 12:34 AM

Don't feed the trolls. No attention is the best way to handle them.

by Anonymousreply 118January 9, 2021 1:21 AM

Michelle would beat R102's ass down in 2 seconds flat.

by Anonymousreply 119January 9, 2021 1:32 AM

Yes, she's right, why weren't they led out in handcuffs?

Sorry if there's been an informed answer to that question.

by Anonymousreply 120January 9, 2021 7:54 AM

In other words: Michelle Obama is for censorship.

by Anonymousreply 121January 9, 2021 8:04 AM

[quote]In other words: Michelle Obama is for censorship.

Go away.

by Anonymousreply 122January 9, 2021 8:45 AM

The trolls have nothing left but blatant racism

Of course, we can now see that that was all they really had to begin with

by Anonymousreply 123January 9, 2021 1:25 PM

[quote] Go away.

They must. They are weak minded. So don’t mind them. Just arrest them if they commit a crime.

by Anonymousreply 124January 9, 2021 2:13 PM

Michelle’s hubby is a murderous piece of shit.

by Anonymousreply 125January 9, 2021 2:31 PM

I do not believe the oligarchs of Big Tech have the right to eliminate Trump, or anyone else, from the public square, which is what social media is. If someone incites violence, then he or she can be prosecuted. But it is not for Big Tech (and certainly not a hateful race-obsessed bitch like Michelle Obama) to decide what political opinions are acceptable.

by Anonymousreply 126January 10, 2021 9:14 AM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!