Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Willy Wonky (1971) or Charlie & the Chocolate Factory (2005)

What is your preference?

by Anonymousreply 43December 21, 2020 10:48 AM

This should've been a poll.

by Anonymousreply 1December 20, 2020 12:09 AM

The original, minus the horrible songs.

by Anonymousreply 2December 20, 2020 12:10 AM

Willy Wonka, of course. The Johnny Depp version was a hot mess.

by Anonymousreply 3December 20, 2020 12:12 AM

Wonky, OP?

Is that the Andy Cohen version?

by Anonymousreply 4December 20, 2020 12:18 AM

R4 that's Walleyed Wanker and His chocolate factory

by Anonymousreply 5December 20, 2020 12:22 AM

1971

by Anonymousreply 6December 20, 2020 12:27 AM

R2 The original had at least one great song -- Pure Imagination

by Anonymousreply 7December 20, 2020 12:29 AM

Veruca's song was pretty great, too. You TWERP!

by Anonymousreply 8December 20, 2020 12:33 AM

1971 by far. I WILL say, that the boat ride in the remake really gave viewers an idea of just how vast and cavernous the factory is. And the Augustus Gloop scenario was absolutely disgusting, and right on track with the book. It was excellent.

But beyond that...the remake is garbage.

by Anonymousreply 9December 20, 2020 12:39 AM

Which one generated more income for Roald?

by Anonymousreply 10December 20, 2020 12:52 AM

The original is fun and Gene Wilder is wonderful. The remake is a piece of shit, as remakes tend to be. A Michael Jackson-like Willie Wonka? Oh my God.

by Anonymousreply 11December 20, 2020 12:57 AM

You would have to strap me to a chair to watch the Johnny Depp one.

by Anonymousreply 12December 20, 2020 12:58 AM

The1971 was pure joy for young kids with imagination. Loved it. Didn't bother with the remake.

by Anonymousreply 13December 20, 2020 1:22 AM

Just saw a clip. Johnny Depp is awful. The Charlie kids was a better actor.

Gene Wilder was perfection by comparison.

by Anonymousreply 14December 20, 2020 1:29 AM

Hated both, but loved the book.

by Anonymousreply 15December 20, 2020 1:37 AM

Perhaps trying to shore up his reputation (Roald Dahl was an anti-semite and an all-around prick) Roald Dahl's worshipful wife Felicity Crosland came out with the revelation that Charlie was supposed to be a BLACK child, but Dahl's publishers were against the idea. I think that is just utter horseshit. I don't think Roald Dahl even knew people of color existed, much less have one as the central character in one of his books. But illustrations of the Oompa Loompas in the first editions of "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory" DID depict them as looking like African American pygmies. As one critic stated "Despite what Felicity Dahl implied, Roald Dahl never considered any black roles for his famous story that were not right out of the Sambo tradition, British imperialism, or slavery."

by Anonymousreply 16December 20, 2020 2:25 AM

Willy Wonka, by far

by Anonymousreply 17December 20, 2020 2:32 AM

What was the point of the remake?? It sucked

by Anonymousreply 18December 20, 2020 2:41 AM

1971 version.

by Anonymousreply 19December 20, 2020 2:44 AM

Don't forget the Christian Borle Broadway version.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 20December 20, 2020 2:51 AM

Has anyone actually watched the animated version with Tom and Jerry.

by Anonymousreply 21December 20, 2020 2:54 AM

?

by Anonymousreply 22December 20, 2020 2:54 AM

1971, of course - despite my mom having thrown a full-out bitch fit uproar with me during the middle of the film, and dragging me out of the theater; one of those 'you're not appreciative enough of all that I do for you' fits which she occasionally indulged in the years leading up to her main psychotic break into schizophrenia (1976). In 1971 when Wonka was released to the theaters, I was just shy of seven years old. I didn't see the second half of that film until sometime later in the 70s, when it aired on television.

by Anonymousreply 23December 20, 2020 3:42 AM

R5 that ride through the fudge tunnel was terrifying.

by Anonymousreply 24December 20, 2020 3:43 AM

I miss the days when kids' movies looked like gay acid trips created by middle-aged Jewish men.

by Anonymousreply 25December 20, 2020 3:52 AM

R23 That sucks. I can relate as my mom was nuts, too. Hope your life is better now.

by Anonymousreply 26December 20, 2020 7:50 AM

QUE ?

by Anonymousreply 27December 20, 2020 7:51 AM

1971. The remake is an abomination. Ugly, joyless and Johnny Depp just playing another variation on his "I'm-so-eccentric-with-an-accent" performance. The actor, though, who played the Oompa Loompas was the only fun part of the film.

by Anonymousreply 28December 20, 2020 8:01 AM

The original hands down. The re-make is crap. Tum Burton lost his mojo in the 21st century - has been hack.

by Anonymousreply 29December 20, 2020 8:14 AM

1971. The Burton version had some good things, but Johnny Depp's performance killed it.

by Anonymousreply 30December 20, 2020 10:16 AM

According to Johnny Depp he channelled Michael Jackson for this role. Another reason to despise the Burton version.

by Anonymousreply 31December 20, 2020 11:51 AM

Had he channeled Reggie Jackson he might have improved it. Depp sucked.

by Anonymousreply 32December 20, 2020 2:54 PM

I actually like Depp's performance. There are all sorts of sly bits that I think are marvelous. I also like that the songs use the actual words from the book.

What I hate about the second version is the stupid added backstory with Wonka's father.

by Anonymousreply 33December 20, 2020 3:06 PM

[quote] that ride through the fudge tunnel was terrifying.

Been there.

by Anonymousreply 34December 20, 2020 4:04 PM

[quote]The original hands down. The re-make is crap. Tum Burton lost his mojo in the 21st century - has been hack.

Burton's early films still hold up. [italic]Pee-Wee's Big Adventure, Beetlejuice[/italic], and [italic]Ed Wood[/italic] are his best films.

by Anonymousreply 35December 21, 2020 2:54 AM

Burton's earlier films are certainly fare superior. Never got PeeWee but I love Beetlejuice, Edward Scissorhands & Ed Wood. What a comedown Burton has had.

by Anonymousreply 36December 21, 2020 8:08 AM

I liked the blonde boy of Charlie then the dirty blonde one, but he turn out cute when he gotten older. Freddie Highmore.

by Anonymousreply 37December 21, 2020 9:30 AM

Book #1

Gene Wilder as Wonka #2

Johnny Depp as Wonka #3

by Anonymousreply 38December 21, 2020 9:36 AM

Op must be joking. The Gene Wilder one, no question! For whatever reason, Burtons' films went from quirky and charmingly strange to just plain repulsive in recent years. The Alice in wonderland movie is another execrable example.

by Anonymousreply 39December 21, 2020 9:49 AM

Has anyone else read the sequel that Dahl wrote? It picks up the story right from where the first book ends. I thought it was awful.

by Anonymousreply 40December 21, 2020 9:49 AM

To be fair R16, I know I read that little titbit about how Charlie was meant to be a black child originally (and he was told to change it) back in the late 90s. The story changed a lot from how it was first envisaged to the final draft. There were many more children (ten?) in the original story, and I don't think Charlie was meant to stand out particularly in the first draft as being any better than the others. The Oompa-loompas were originally African pygmies too.

There were apparently at least six children in the story until very late (the girl who was removed last was a teacher's pet who was - it seems - crushed into powder when she tried to destroy the machine that made a certain sweet that gave children fake symptoms of illness so that they could get out of school).

Re: which movie is better, without a doubt the 70s one. On rewatching it recently as an adult now, I appreciated a lot of the adult humour that makes it a much better all round family movie. I did like that the remake included the squirrel scene, but other than that it was pretty awful.

by Anonymousreply 41December 21, 2020 10:14 AM

^Sorry, R16, you did mention the original Oompa-loompas, and I still for some reason got on a roll and repeated what you said. Apologies.

by Anonymousreply 42December 21, 2020 10:16 AM

The Oompa-loompas in the 1971 film still give me the creeps. And only more so when one if their own was elected President.

by Anonymousreply 43December 21, 2020 10:48 AM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!